PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Curr Opin Pharmacol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 5.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2950121
NIHMSID: NIHMS40508

Adenosine as a neuromodulator in neurological diseases

Abstract

Adenosine is a modulator of brain function uniquely positioned to integrate excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission. The past few years brought a wealth of new data fostering our understanding how the adenosine system is involved in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases. Thus, dysregulation of the adenosine system is implicated in epileptogenesis and cell therapies have been developed to locally augment adenosine in an approach to prevent seizures. While activation of inhibitory adenosine A1 receptors is beneficial in epilepsy, chronic pain and cerebral ischemia, inhibition of facilitatory A2A receptors has profound neuroprotective effects, which are currently exploited in clinical trials in Parkinson’s disease. A new era of adenosine-based therapies has begun, with the prospect to cover a wide range of neurological diseases.

Introduction

The purine ribonucleoside adenosine controls many brain functions in physiological and pathophysiological conditions via activation of high-affinity A1 or A2A, low-affinity A2B, or low-abundance A3 adenosine receptors (ARs) [1,2]. Coupling of the receptors to either inhibitory (A1, A3) or stimulatory (A2A, A2B) G-proteins and differential spatial distribution within the brain [1] allow a high degree of complexity in the effects of adenosine and permit the modulation of other neurotransmitter or modulator systems [3]. Due to these multifaceted properties of adenosine, an adenosine-based pharmacopoeia has been established for a variety of conditions [2]. This review covers literature from the past two years, focusing on selected newer trends on the role of adenosine in neurological disease and translation of recent research findings into adenosine-based therapies.

Adenosine: an upstream-regulator of neurotransmission

Inhibitory neuromodulation by adenosine is largely mediated by activation of A1Rs that are coupled to inhibitory Gi or Go containing G-proteins [1,2]. The consequences of A1R activation are stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, activation of inwardly rectifying K+ channels, inhibition of Ca2+ channels and activation of phospholipase C. As a net result, the release of various neurotransmitters, in particular glutamate, dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine, is inhibited. Accordingly, preclinical studies have demonstrated that activation of A1Rs has profound antiepileptic [4] and neuroprotective [5] functions.

The highest expression of A2ARs is found in striatal neurons, which are involved in the control of motor function and habit formation [6]. Inhibitors of the A2AR have profound neuroprotective functions [5] and prevent apoptosis [7]. Recent findings indicate that synaptic activation of A2ARs can subsequently downregulate A1Rs or its responses [8]. An additional layer of complexity in adenosine receptor function is created by heteromerization with each other (e.g. A1/A2A heteromers) or with other neurotransmitter receptors (e.g. A2A/D2 heteromers) [9]. Thus, adenosine, by its capability to activate receptors with opposing functions (A1 versus A2), is uniquely positioned as an upstream regulator for the fine-tuning and integration of excitatory and inhibitory functions within the CNS.

Astrocytic regulation of synaptic adenosine

Recent findings indicate that synaptic levels of adenosine are largely regulated by astrocytes [1014]. The elegant experiments from Phil Haydon’s group have documented that – under physiological conditions – the major source of synaptic adenosine is derived from astrocytic vesicular release of ATP, followed by extracellular degradation to adenosine via a cascade of ectonucleotidases [15••]. Using transgenic mice with a defective astrocytic vesicular release system for ATP, the authors demonstrated a reduction of the tonic suppression of neuronal networks [15••]. Intracellularly, adenosine is rapidly metabolized by phosphorylation to AMP via adenosine kinase (ADK), the key enzyme of adenosine metabolism [16], which, in adult brain, is predominantly expressed in astrocytes [13]. Thus, ADK is ideally located to control the astrocyte-based adenosine cycle (Fig. 1) by driving the influx of adenosine into the cell via bi-directional nucleoside transporters [16].

Figure 1
The adenosine cycle

Adenosine and neurological disease

Given the complex nature and ubiquitous distribution of the adenosine system, any imbalance is expected to lead to neurological disease. The following sections describe recent findings on the role of the adenosine system in neurological diseases (Table 1).

Table 1
Possible adenosine-based therapeutic strategies for neurological diseases

Epilepsy

Adenosine is an endogenous anticonvulsant [17]. The past few years have brought new insights in our understanding that dysfunction of astrocyte-mediated gliotransmission [12], and in particular dysfunction of the adenosine system [16,18] can cause seizures [17], or augment the spread of kainic acid- or traumatic brain injury- induced seizures and associated neuronal cell loss [18,19]. The adenosine system is critically involved in regulating proliferation and hypertrophy of astrocytes leading to astrogliosis [20], a hallmark of epilepsy. Consequently, changes in the homeostasis of the astrocyte-based adenosine cycle are to be expected in epileptic brain. Thus, upregulation of the astrocyte-based enzyme ADK has been identified as a consequence of astrogliosis, leading to a reduced tone of the endogenous anticonvulsant adenosine [16]. During epileptogenesis, upregulation of ADK coincides with the emergence of spontaneous chronic seizures [16]. Likewise, high neuronal expression of ADK in the immature mouse brain [13] may explain increased susceptibility to hypoglycemia-induced seizures in the immature brain [21]. The hypothesis that upregulated ADK might be a culprit of epileptogenesis is further supported by transgenic mice overexpressing ADK in brain; these animals display reduced seizure thresholds and spontaneous seizures [22•]. These findings suggest, that local restoration of the inhibitory adenosine tone should prevent seizures. Indeed, intraventricular implants of cells engineered to release adenosine, prevent seizures in a rat model of epilepsy [4]. More recently, it was demonstrated that intrahippocampal implants of ADK deficient stem cell derived neural precursors suppress kindling epileptogenesis [23•]. These findings suggest, that focal augmentation of the adenosine system has the potential not only to suppress seizures, but also to prevent epileptogenesis. Thus, adenosine-augmenting cell and gene therapies might lead to improved treatment options for patients suffering from intractable epilepsy [24].

Cerebral ischemia

A rapid increase in adenosine as an acute response to cerebral ischemia [25,26••] likely represents an endogenous neuroprotective mechanism, which might be involved in the initial phase of ischemic preconditioning leading to a cerebroprotective state known as ischaemic tolerance [27]. This is a complex phenomenon, in which reprogramming of the genome [28] and astrocytes appear to play key roles [29]. Recently, the astrocytic enzyme ADK was shown to be downregulated within a time frame of 3 hours following middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in the mouse [30]. As expected, downregulation of ADK led to a marked increase in ambient adenosine, which might be a mechanistic cue for the acute endogenous protective response of the brain to injury [30]. Indeed, ADK expression levels appear to play a key role in regulating neuronal vulnerability. Transgenic mice overexpressing ADK are characterized by increased susceptibility to MCAO-induced cell death [31]. Conversely, transplantation of ADK-deficient neural or glial progenitor cells into the striatum of mice one week prior to MCAO, led to a striking reduction of the injured brain volume [32]. These findings indicate that susceptibility to ischemia-induced cell death is tightly balanced by the tone of ambient adenosine.

Chronic pain

Adenosine has complex effects on pain and can either be pro- or antinociceptive depending on the site of application or the receptor(s) involved [33]. Most attention has been devoted to pain pathways involving the A1R, which dominates in mediating the antinociceptive effects of adenosine, as has been documented in animal models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain [33]. Apart from direct administration of adenosine or A1 agonists, ADK inhibitors have been considered for the treatment of chronic pain [34]. More recently, antagonism of A2ARs has been suggested as a novel strategy for the management of chronic pain [35]. Thus, the A2A selective antagonist SCH 58261 produced antinociception in two acute thermal pain tests [36]. Following intraplanar formalin injection, A2AR knockout mice displayed reduced biting and flinching responses [37]. These findings suggest that the A2AR has significant potential as a novel target for pain control.

Parkinson’s disease

Due to its high abundance in striatopallidal neurons, the adenosine A2AR has emerged as the prime non-dopaminergic target in the search for improved therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease (PD) [38•]. Most importantly, A2ARs can form functional heteromeric complexes with dopamine D2Rs and A1Rs, and thus have the capability to integrate and fine-tune neurotransmission in the basal ganglia [9,39,40]. Due to reciprocal antagonistic interactions between A2A and D2Rs, the blockade of the adenosine A2AR in striatopallidal neurons leads to a reduction of the postsynaptic effects of dopamine deficiency and thus to an amelioration of the motor deficits in PD [40]. In addition, antagonism of the A2AR has direct neuroprotective effects, with the potential to slow down disease progression [38•]. Consequently, A2A antagonists have been developed for clinical trials in PD. The A2A antagonist KW-6002 has shown potential in phase IIb and III clinical trials in patients in an advanced stage of PD [2]. The initial clinical results are promising and illustrate a translational drug discovery approach, which is based on the discovery of A2A/D2 interactions.

Alzheimer’s disease

Epidemiological studies indicate that caffeine consumption is inversely correlated with the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1]. In line with these observations, long-term caffeine treatment in AD transgenic mice resulted in improved reference and working memory, and in reduced brain β-amyloid production [41]. Likewise, caffeine and selective A2AR antagonists prevented β-amyloid induced cognitive deficits in mice [42]. The potential of adenosine-based therapies for AD is just emerging and – in contrast to PD – has not yet been translated into clinical trials.

Huntington’s disease

Similar to its role and therapeutic potential in PD and AD, the A2AR has gained recent interest in the pathophysiology of Huntington’s disease (HD) [43]. Since A2ARs stimulate glutamate outflow and inflammatory gliosis, it is of interest to note that A2ARs are mainly localized on those neurons, which degenerate early in HD; consequently, changes in A2AR expression and signalling have been reported in models of HD, leading to the concept that the aberrant A2AR phenotype may represent a novel biomarker for HD [44]. This conclusion is supported by findings in a mouse model of HD, demonstrating a transient increase in A2AR density and A2AR-dependent cAMP production at early presymptomatic ages, i.e. well before the onset of symptoms [45]. These findings suggest that modulation of A2ARs might be an interesting therapeutic strategy for HD.

Schizophrenia

Currently, schizophrenia is best explained by the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses of schizophrenia. However, each hypothesis alone can only incompletely explain the complex pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The newly proposed adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia [46•] might constitute a critical link between the two hypotheses.

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia is largely based on effects of dopamine receptor antagonists and agonists to suppress and to promote psychotic symptoms, respectively. Thus, the efficacy of many antipsychotics correlates with their ability to block dopamine D2Rs [47,48]. In addition, increased dopamine turnover, and enhanced amphetamine-induced dopamine-release have been documented in schizophrenia patients [46•]. These findings are compatible with a deficiency in adenosine, which can enhance dopamine release due to the inhibitory effect of A1Rs on dopamine release [1], and potentiate amphetamine-induced locomotion and dopamine release as suggested by effects of A1R antagonists [39]. Interactions between A2ARs and D2Rs allow further opportunity for mutual modulation between the adenosine and dopamine systems. These mechanisms could provide a rationale for an antipsychotic-like profile of adenosine receptor agonists.

According to the glutamate hypothesis, reduced N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) function may contribute to the cognitive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia [49]. NMDAR blockade can give rise to behavioral dysfunction and psychotic-like behavior, while co-agonists of the NMDAR, such as D-serine and glycine, improve cognition and negative symptoms in schizophrenia [49]. Similarly, disruption of the glycine transporter 1 has promnesic and antipsychotic potential [50]. Adenosine inhibits glutamate release and the post-synaptic action of excitatory neurotransmitters upon neuronal hyperpolarization via A1Rs [1]. Thus, in animal models of schizophrenia, AR agonists were effective against behavioral as well as neurophysiological effects induced by NMDAR antagonists, thus indicating their potential antipsychotic efficacy in humans [46•].

Conclusions

The examples outlined above in a variety of neurological disorders indicate that adenosine concentrations need to be under tight control. Any increases or decreases in ambient adenosine above or below certain thresholds is expected to lead to characteristic pathologies via an imbalance of adenosine receptor mediated secondary effects. Due to interactions with glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission, adenosine can be regarded as a “master regulator” to integrate and fine-tune various neurotransmitter systems in the brain (Fig. 2). ADK and astrocytes as the key regulators of synaptic adenosine have therefore important upstream functions. Thus, therapeutic modulation of ADK has great promise for future treatment strategies for the wide range of pathologies discussed here (Table 1). To further promote ADK-based therapies, a detailed understanding how the enzyme is regulated in vivo is urgently needed.

Figure 2
Adenosine kinase – the key regulator to fine-tune neurotransmission

Acknowledgments

The work of the author was supported by grant R01 NS047622-01 from the NIH, by the Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation and by the Epilepsy Research Foundation through the generous support of Arlene & Arnold Goldstein Family Foundation.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted

• as of special interest

• • of outstanding interest

1. Fredholm BB, Chen JF, Cunha RA, Svenningsson P, Vaugeois JM. Adenosine and brain function. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;63:191–270. [PubMed]
2. Jacobson KA, Gao ZG. Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:247–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Cunha-Reis D, Fontinha BM, Ribeiro JA, Sebastiao AM. Tonic adenosine A1 and A2A receptor activation is required for the excitatory action of VIP on synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of the hippocampus. Neuropharmacol. 2007;52:313–320. [PubMed]
4. Boison D. Adenosine-based cell therapy approaches for pharmacoresistant epilepsies. Neurodegener Dis. 2007;4:28–33. [PubMed]
5. Cunha RA. Neuroprotection by adenosine in the brain: from A1 receptor activation to A2A receptor blockade. Purinergic Signaling. 2005;1:111–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ. The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:464–476. [PubMed]
7. Silva CG, Porciuncula LO, Canas PM, Oliveira CR, Cunha RA. Blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors prevents staurosporine-induced apoptosis of rat hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2007 [PubMed]
8. Ciruela F, Casado V, Rodrigues RJ, Lujan R, Burgueno J, Canals M, Borycz J, Rebola N, Goldberg SR, Mallol J, et al. Presynaptic control of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission by adenosine A1-A2A receptor heteromers. J Neurosci. 2006;26:2080–2087. [PubMed]
9. Fuxe K, Ferre S, Genedani S, Franco R, Agnati LF. Adenosine receptor-dopamine receptor interactions in the basal ganglia and their relevance for brain function. Physiol Behav. 2007 [PubMed]
10. Martin ED, Fernandez M, Perea G, Pascual O, Haydon PG, Araque A, Cena V. Adenosine released by astrocytes contributes to hypoxia-induced modulation of synaptic transmission. Glia. 2007;55:36–45. [PubMed]
11. Halassa MM, Fellin T, Takano H, Dong JH, Haydon PG. Synaptic islands defined by the territory of a single astrocyte. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6473–6477. [PubMed]
12. Halassa MM, Fellin T, Haydon PG. The tripartite synapse: roles for gliotransmission in health and disease. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13:54–63. [PubMed]
13. Studer FE, Fedele DE, Marowsky A, Schwerdel C, Wernli K, Vogt K, Fritschy J-M, Boison D. Shift of adenosine kinase expression from neurons to astrocytes during postnatal development suggests dual functionality of the enzyme. Neuroscience. 2006;142:125–137. [PubMed]
14. Haydon PG, Carmignoto G. Astrocyte control of synaptic transmission and neurovascular coupling. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:1009–1031. [PubMed]
15••. Pascual O, Casper KB, Kubera C, Zhang J, Revilla-Sanchez R, Sul JY, Takano H, Moss SJ, McCarthy K, Haydon PG. Astrocytic purinergic signaling coordinates synaptic networks. Science. 2005;310:113–116. By generating inducible transgenic mice that express a dominant-negative SNARE domain selectively in astrocytes, the vesicular release of neurotransmitters was selectively blocked in astrocytes. Using these animals it was demonstrated for the first time that adenosine-mediated tonic suppression of synaptic transmission was dependent on astrocytic vesicular release of ATP. These studies demonstrated that astrocytes are crucially involved in regulating and fine-tuning synaptic strength and plasticity. [PubMed]
16. Boison D. Adenosine kinase, epilepsy and stroke: mechanisms and therapies. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2006;27:652–658. [PubMed]
17. Boison D. Adenosine and epilepsy: from therapeutic rationale to new therapeutic strategies. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:25–36. [PubMed]
18. Fedele DE, Li T, Lan JQ, Fredholm BB, Boison D. Adenosine A1 receptors are crucial in keeping an epileptic focus localized. Exp Neurol. 2006;200:184–190. [PubMed]
19. Kochanek PM, Vagni VA, Janesko KL, Washington CB, Crumrine PK, Garman RH, Jenkins LW, Clark RS, Homanics GE, Dixon CE, et al. Adenosine A1 receptor knockout mice develop lethal status epilepticus after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:565–575. [PubMed]
20. Dare E, Schulte G, Karovic O, Hammarberg C, Fredholm BB. Modulation of glial cell functions by adenosine receptors. Physiol Behav. 2007 [PubMed]
21. Abdelmalik PA, Shannon P, Yiu A, Liang P, Adamchik Y, Weisspapir M, Samoilova M, Burnham WM, Carlen PL. Hypoglycemic seizures during transient hypoglycemia exacerbate hippocampal dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis. 2007;26:646–660. [PubMed]
22•. Fedele DE, Gouder N, Güttinger M, Gabernet L, Scheurer L, Rulicke T, Crestani F, Boison D. Astrogliosis in epilepsy leads to overexpression of adenosine kinase resulting in seizure aggravation. Brain. 2005;128:2383–2395. This is a demonstration that transgenic overexpression of adenosine kinase in brain alters seizure susceptibility. Upregulated ADK was associated with a reduced tone of the endogenous anticonvulsant adenosine and with spontaneous seizures and lowered seizure thresholds. [PubMed]
23•. Li T, Steinbeck JA, Lusardi T, Koch P, Lan JQ, Wilz A, Segschneider M, Simon RP, Brustle O, Boison D. Suppression of kindling epileptogenesis by adenosine releasing stem cell-derived brain implants. Brain. 2007;130:1276–1288. Embryonic stem cells engineered to release adenosine by biallelic disruption of the adenosine kinase gene were differentiated into neural precursor cells and transplanted into the infrahippocampal cleft of rats prior to the onset of kindling. Animals with adenosine releasing intrahippocampal implants were characterized with a significant suppression of kindling development. This is the first study to demonstrate an antiepileptogenic potential of adenosine. [PubMed]
24. Boison D. Cell and gene therapies for refractory epilepsy. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2007;5:115–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Frenguelli BG, Wigmore G, Llaudet E, Dale N. Temporal and mechanistic dissociation of ATP and adenosine release during ischaemia in the mammalian hippocampus. J Neurochem. 2007;101:1400–1413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26••. Pearson T, Damian K, Lynas RE, Frenguelli BG. Sustained elevation of extracellular adenosine and activation of A(1) receptors underlie the post-ischaemic inhibition of neuronal function in rat hippocampus in vitro. J Neurochem. 2006;97:1357–1368. This study combined electrophysiology with synchronized online detection of adenosine using microelectrode biosensors for adenosine. Using this ingenious approach, the authors convincingly demonstrate a link between the post-ischemic rise in adenosine and inhibition of neurotransmission. [PubMed]
27. Gidday JM. Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:437–448. [PubMed]
28. Stenzel-Poore MP, Stevens SL, King JS, Simon RP. Preconditioning reprograms the response to ischemic injury and primes the emergence of unique endogenous neuroprotective phenotypes: a speculative synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:680–685. [PubMed]
29. Trendelenburg G, Dirnagl U. Neuroprotective role of astrocytes in cerebral ischemia: focus on ischemic preconditioning. Glia. 2005;50:307–320. [PubMed]
30. Pignataro G, Maysami S, Studer FE, Wilz A, Simon RP, Boison D. Downregulation of hippocampal adenosine kinase after focal ischemia as potential endogenous neuroprotective mechanism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 [PubMed]
31. Pignataro G, Simon RP, Boison D. Transgenic overexpression of adenosine kinase aggravates cell death in ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1–5. [PubMed]
32. Pignataro G, Studer FE, Wilz A, Simon RP, Boison D. Neuroprotection in ischemic mouse brain induced by stem cell-derived brain implants. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:919–927. [PubMed]
33. Sawynok J. Adenosine and ATP receptors. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007:309–328. [PubMed]
34. McGaraughty S, Jarvis MF. Purinergic control of neuropathic pain. Drug Dev Res. 2006;67:376–388.
35. Ferre S, Diamond I, Goldberg SR, Yao L, Hourani SM, Huang ZL, Urade Y, Kitchen I. Adenosine A(2A) receptors in ventral striatum, hypothalamus and nociceptive circuitry: Implications for drug addiction, sleep and pain. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Godfrey L, Yan L, Clarke GD, Ledent C, Kitchen I, Hourani SM. Modulation of paracetamol antinociception by caffeine and by selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonists in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;531:80–86. [PubMed]
37. Hussey MJ, Clarke GD, Ledent C, Hourani SM, Kitchen I. Reduced response to the formalin test and lowered spinal NMDA glutamate receptor binding in adenosine A2A receptor knockout mice. Pain. 2007;129:287–294. [PubMed]
38•. Schwarzschild MA, Agnati L, Fuxe K, Chen JF, Morelli M. Targeting adenosine A2A receptors in Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2006;29:647–654. The authors review the neurochemical rationale for developing A2A receptor based anti-Parkinsonian drugs and provide an up-to-date overview of the clinical potential of A2AR antagonists. [PubMed]
39. Schiffmann SN, Fisone G, Moresco R, Cunha RA, Ferre S. Adenosine A(2A) receptors and basal ganglia physiology. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Fuxe K, Marcellino D, Genedani S, Agnati L. Adenosine A(2A) receptors, dopamine D(2) receptors and their interactions in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2007 [PubMed]
41. Arendash GW, Schleif W, Rezai-Zadeh K, Jackson EK, Zacharia LC, Cracchiolo JR, Shippy D, Tan J. Caffeine protects Alzheimer’s mice against cognitive impairment and reduces brain beta-amyloid production. Neurosci. 2006;142:941–952. [PubMed]
42. Dall’Igna OP, Fett P, Gomes MW, Souza DO, Cunha RA, Lara DR. Caffeine and adenosine A(2a) receptor antagonists prevent beta-amyloid (25–35)-induced cognitive deficits in mice. Exp Neurol. 2007;203:241–245. [PubMed]
43. Popoli P, Blum D, Martire A, Ledent C, Ceruti S, Abbracchio MP. Functions, dysfunctions and possible therapeutic relevance of adenosine A2A receptors in Huntington’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2007;81:331–348. [PubMed]
44. Maglione V, Cannella M, Martino T, De Blasi A, Frati L, Squitieri F. The platelet maximum number of A2A-receptor binding sites (Bmax) linearly correlates with age at onset and CAG repeat expansion in Huntington’s disease patients with predominant chorea. Neurosci Lett. 2006;393:27–30. [PubMed]
45. Tarditi A, Camurri A, Varani K, Borea PA, Woodman B, Bates G, Cattaneo E, Abbracchio MP. Early and transient alteration of adenosine A2A receptor signaling in a mouse model of Huntington disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23:44–53. [PubMed]
46•. Lara DR, Dall’Igna OP, Ghisolfi ES, Brunstein MG. Involvement of adenosine in the neurobiology of schizophrenia and its therapeutic implications. Prog Neuropsychopharm Biol Psych. 2006;30:617–629. This extensive and concise review is the first and only article propagating the “adenosine hypothesis of schizophrenia”. The authors provide compelling evidence for their hypothesis based on the concept that adenosine, via activation of A1 and A2ARs, is uniquely positioned to influence glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission. [PubMed]
47. Seeman P. Targeting the dopamine D2 receptor in schizophrenia. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2006;10:515–531. [PubMed]
48. Seeman P, Schwarz J, Chen JF, Szechtman H, Perreault M, McKnight GS, Roder JC, Quirion R, Boksa P, Srivastava LK, et al. Psychosis pathways converge via D2 high dopamine receptors. Synapse. 2006;60:319–346. [PubMed]
49. Ross CA, Margolis RL, Reading SA, Pletnikov M, Coyle JT. Neurobiology of schizophrenia. Neuron. 2006;52:139–153. [PubMed]
50. Yee BK, Balic E, Singer P, Schwerdel C, Grampp T, Gabernet L, Knuesel I, Benke D, Feldon J, Mohler H, et al. Disruption of glycine transporter 1 restricted to forebrain neurons is associated with a pro-cognitive and anti-psychotic phenotypic profile. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3169–3181. [PubMed]