PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of f1000bioLatest ContentReportsReportsReports
 
F1000 Biol Rep. 2010; 2: 46.
Published online 2010 June 23. doi:  10.3410/B2-46
PMCID: PMC2950034

De novo prions

Abstract

Prions are responsible for a heterogeneous group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases. They occur in three forms - sporadic, genetic, or acquired - and involve non-covalent post-translational modifications of the cellular prion protein (PrPC). Prions (PrPSc) are characterized by their infectious properties and intrinsic ability to act as a template, converting the normal, physiological PrPC into the pathological form, PrPSc. The ‘protein-only’ hypothesis, postulated by Stanley B Prusiner, implies that the generation of de novo prions is possible. Exciting recent work, in vivo and in vitro, has further strengthened this postulate.

Introduction and context

Prions, proteinaceous infectious particles, or PrPSc, are responsible for a heterogeneous group of fatal neurodegenerative diseases [1]. Prion diseases manifest as sporadic, genetic, or acquired disorders, involving non-covalent, post-translational modifications of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC, where the superscript C stands for cellular) into PrPSc (where the superscript Sc stands for scrapie, the prion disease that affects sheep) [2]. Prions are characterized by their infectious properties and by the intrinsic ability of their secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures to act as a template and convert the normal physiological PrPC into the pathological, disease-causing form, PrPSc [3].

Major recent advances

In vitro support for de novo prions

The ‘protein-only’ hypothesis for prion propagation implies that it should be possible to generate prions in vitro from highly purified recombinant PrP (recPrP). Several attempts have been made to confirm this hypothesis, but the resulting prions had little or no infectivity, as well as minimal or no protease digestion resistance - two elements necessary to prove the ‘protein-only’ hypothesis [4,5]. In recent years, the most striking work supporting the ‘protein-only’ postulate has shown that pure recPrP can be converted in vitro into a structural form similar to prions [6-9]. When PrPSc is treated with proteinase K (PK) and further processed, the N-terminal region is removed, resulting in a PK-resistant core with an apparent molecular mass of 27-30 kDa, called PrP27-30 [10]. Legname et al. [6] produced truncated recombinant mouse PrP (MoPrP), corresponding to PrP27-30, and then converted this into amyloid fibrils. Amyloid fibrils were intracerebrally inoculated into transgenic (Tg) mice over-expressing the N-terminally truncated form of MoPrP, MoPrP(89-231). These mice, called Tg9949, express MoPrP(89-231) at levels 16 times higher than the normal PrPC expressed in wild-type mice [11]. These inoculated fibrils caused neurological defects between 380 and 660 days post-inoculation (DPI), depending on the biochemical protocol applied [6]. Brain homogenates of mice inoculated with the amyloid preparations exhibited the PK-resistant form of PrPSc. Serial transmission of these brain homogenates caused disease in transgenic and wild-type mice. Thus, the synthetic prions generated using truncated recombinant MoPrP demonstrated that PrP is necessary and sufficient for infectivity [6]. This seminal work has further contributed to our understanding of the biochemical and biophysical characteristics of prions, indicating the existence of an inverse correlation between the stability and infectivity of prion isolates [8]. Colby and colleagues [9] took this work a step further; they produced an array of PrP amyloids with different conformational stabilities and found that the inverse relationship between stability and incubation time was still valid. The most stable prion strains exhibited the longest incubation times, whereas more labile amyloids revealed shorter incubation times [9]. More recently, Colby and colleagues [12] isolated protease-sensitive synthetic prion (sPrPSc). Often, PrPSc is protease-resistant but sPrPSc has been isolated in humans and other animals. Colby et al. reported that sPrPSc was generated in vitro during polymerization of recPrP into amyloid fibers. In 22 independent experiments, recPrP amyloid preparations, but not recPrP monomers or oligomers, transmitted disease to Tg9949 mice (n = 164). In addition, they inoculated three synthetic prion isolates into Tg4053 mice that overexpress full-length MoPrP. Tg4053 mice are not prone to developing spontaneous neurological dysfunction [13]. The resulting synthetic prion isolates caused disease in 600-750 DPI in Tg4053 mice, which exhibited sPrPSc. These novel synthetic prions demonstrate that conformational changes in wild-type PrP can produce prions composed exclusively of sPrPSc [12].

More recently, Makarava et al. [14] showed additional experimental evidence that synthetic prions can be generated when amyloid fibrils produced from full-length recombinant Syrian hamster (SHa) PrP were intracerebrally inoculated in SHa animals.

Castilla and colleagues generated infectious scrapie prions [15] using the protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) in vitro system [16]. PMCA is a procedure involving cyclic amplification of PrP misfolding that allows rapid conversion of large excess PrPC into a protease-resistant, prion-like form in the presence of low quantities of PrPSc template [16]. In the experiment of Castilla et al., 263K-infected (SHa-adapted scrapie form of prion) SHa brain homogenates were subjected to 20 PMCA cycles in the presence of PrPC. Although no molecules of the original scrapie brain homogenate were present in samples, biochemical and structural properties of the in vitro-amplified samples still revealed the same features of 263K prions. In particular, the amplified sample was PK-resistant, highly insoluble in non-denaturant detergent (such as 10% sarkosyl), and enriched in β-sheet content. The PK-resistant-inoculated animals died at around 170 DPI showing the typical signs of scrapie. To verify the PK-resistant in vitro-generated stability over time, serial transmissions were carried out; animals inoculated with this material exhibited neurological dysfunction and died after a mean of 136.5 DPI.

To investigate the mechanism of prion formation, Deleault et al. [17] conducted a series of experiments using the PMCA in vitro system in the presence of co-purified lipids and polyanions. They generated PrPSc de novo from the simple combination of PrPC, co-purified lipids, and simple polyanions [17,18], although some questions were raised of whether generation of de novo prions from standard PMCA methodology might be due to cross-contamination from existing prions [4].

The PMCA in vitro system has also been used to propagate prion strains [19-21]. Numerous PMCA amplifications were carried out using, as a seed, different mouse-adapted (RML [Rocky Mountain Laboratory], ME7, 139A and 79A), human (vCJD [variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease]), bovine (301C), SHa (263K), and cervid (CWD [chronic wasting disease]) prion strains. Biochemical analyses - PK digestion, glycosylation ratio, and electrophoresis mobility - of end products revealed the same strain features as the original seeds, suggesting that strains are dependent on the properties of PrPSc [19-21]. PMCA was also employed with prions from various species in combination with transgenic mice to study, and even overcome, the prion species barrier [19,21]. De novo in vitro generation of PrPSc from PrPC and poly(A)RNA using the PMCA system has opened up new ways to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the spontaneous misfolding of the PrP and its propagation. To convert de novo PrPC from healthy SHa and mouse brain homogenates into its infectious isoform, Barria and colleagues [4] modified the PMCA conditions, increasing the number of PMCA cycles. Animals inoculated with this PK-resistant PrP showed abnormalities after an average incubation period of 112.6 days and revealed spongiform degeneration, astroglyosis, and PrP accumulation. Even more recently, Wang et al. [22] employed PMCA under standard conditions (cycles) and produced prions from bacterially expressed recombinant MoPrP(23-230) in the presence of the synthetic anionic phospholipid 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylglycerol and RNA (as a polyanion). These prions were protease-resistant. When injected into wild-type mice, this new aggregated and pathogenic PrP isoform induced neurological signs after about 130 DPI, with the terminal phase occurring around 150 DPI [22]. Nevertheless, upon second passage the newly discovered prion isolate did not lead to abbreviation or stabilization of incubation times in mice, casting doubts about the identification of novel synthetic prions.

In vivo de novo prions

The existence of human genetic prion diseases, in which patients with mutations in the open-reading frame of the human PrP gene, PRNP (PRioN Protein), spontaneously develop prion disease (transmissible in most forms), strongly supports the ‘protein-only’ hypothesis [23,24]. Additionally, many transgenic mice with mutations homologous to human prion diseases also develop spontaneous disease that is often transmissible [25]. Transgenic mice carrying mutations and over-expressing PrP mutants spontaneously develop neurological symptoms similar to those of prion disorders, but their brain homogenates are infectious only for mice carrying the same mutation, and not for wild-type mice [5,26,27]. Therefore, it has been argued in the prion field as to whether this represents true de novo prion generation, or merely an acceleration of disease [28].

Recently, Sigurdson and coworkers [29] developed a transgenic mouse over-expressing two novel mutations in the MoPrP gene, Prnp; these change two amino acids into those normally present in the elk PrP primary sequence that confer a rigid structure to the β2-α2 loop in the protein. Although they created this transgenic mouse to study the role of the rigid-loop structure, surprisingly they found that these mice, called transgenic rigid loop (RL)-PrP mice, developed spontaneous prion disease at variable time points, with a 50% incidence by 364 DPI. Sick RL-PrP mice showed ataxia, weight loss, lethargy, kyphosis, and hind limb paralysis, while their brains showed PrP deposits in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare of the hippocampus, within the corpus callosum, and in the cingulum. Due to a transmission barrier, RL-PrP mice inoculated with wild-type prion strains exhibited prolonged incubation time before developing prion disease. Therefore, the authors did not attempt to transmit transgenic RL-PrP prions directly to wild-type mice; rather, they stabilized the prion isolate from RL-PrP mice by passaging it in mice over-expressing wild-type PrP, called Tga20 mice [30]. Tga20 mice inoculated with brain homogenates from sick RL-PrP mice developed neurologic signs by 481 DPI. Serial passages into Tga20 mice of brain homogenates from RL-PrP-infected Tga20 mice caused similar symptoms with a shorter incubation period. Moreover, both PK resistance and conformational stability increased after each passage. After serial passaging in Tga20 mice, these de novo generated prions were transmissible to wild-type mice [29]. This is the first time that prions generated spontaneously in mice models are able to infect mice carrying a wild-type sequence.

Future directions

In order to define a prion, one needs to fulfill four criteria: transmissibility into recipient animals, neuropathological features (e.g., gliosis, vacuolation, immunopositive PrP deposits) [31], biochemical features, such as PK resistance [32], and stability (defined by resistance to denaturation with chaotropic agents, such as guadinium HCl) [33]. The strain of a prion is determined by these characteristics. Now, we can design synthetic prions with defined biophysical characteristics and predict their infectivity [9]. A major frontier in prion research is to determine the precise structural properties of the prion at the molecular level, such as differences in secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures among different strains that confer defined prion strain characteristics.

Acknowledgments

MDG was funded by the Michael J Homer Family fund and the National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA) K23 AG021989 and R01-AG031189. GL has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement number 222887 - the PRIORITY project.

Abbreviations

DPI
days post-inoculation
MoPrP
mouse PrP
PK
proteinase K
PMCA
protein misfolding cyclic amplification
PrP
prion protein
PrPC
‘cellular’ PrP or normal form of PrP
PrPSc
‘scrapie’ PrP or pathological form of PrP
recPrP
recombinant PrP
RL
rigid loop
SHa
Syrian hamster
sPrPSc
sensitive PrPSc
Tg
transgenic

Notes

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at: http://f1000.com/reports/b/2/46

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science. 1982;216:136–44. doi: 10.1126/science.6801762. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:13363–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Supattapone S. Prion protein conversion in vitro. J Mol Med. 2004;82:348–56. doi: 10.1007/s00109-004-0534-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Barria MA, Mukherjee A, Gonzalez-Romero D, Morales R, Soto C. De novo generation of infectious prions in vitro produces a new disease phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000421. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000421. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Hsiao KK, Groth D, Scott M, Yang SL, Serban H, Rapp D, Foster D, Torchia M, Dearmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Serial transmission in rodents of neurodegeneration from transgenic mice expressing mutant prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:9126–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.19.9126. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Legname G, Baskakov IV, Nguyen HO, Riesner D, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Synthetic mammalian prions. Science. 2004;305:673–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1100195. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 9.0 Exceptional
Evaluated by Joachim Messing 06 Aug 2004
7. Legname G, Nguyen HO, Baskakov IV, Cohen FE, Dearmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Strain-specified characteristics of mouse synthetic prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2168–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409079102. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Legname G, Nguyen HO, Peretz D, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Continuum of prion protein structures enciphers a multitude of prion isolate-specified phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:19105–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608970103. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Colby DW, Giles K, Legname G, Wille H, Baskakov IV, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Design and construction of diverse mammalian prion strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:20417–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910350106. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Prusiner SB, Groth DF, Bolton DC, Kent SB, Hood LE. Purification and structural studies of a major scrapie prion protein. Cell. 1984;38:127–34. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90533-6. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Supattapone S, Muramoto T, Legname G, Mehlhorn I, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB, Scott MR. Identification of two prion protein regions that modify scrapie incubation time. J Virol. 2001;75:1408–13. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.3.1408-1413.2001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
12. Colby DW, Wain R, Baskakov IV, Legname G, Palmer CG, Nguyen HO, Lemus A, Cohen FE, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Protease-sensitive synthetic prions. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000736. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000736. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Telling GC, Haga T, Torchia M, Tremblay P, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Interactions between wild-type and mutant prion proteins modulate neurodegeneration in transgenic mice. Genes Dev. 1996;10:1736–50. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.14.1736. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Bocharova O, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:177–87. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Castilla J, Saá P, Hetz C, Soto C. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell. 2005;121:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 8.2 Exceptional
Evaluated by David P Wolfer 03 May 2005, Matthias Maiwald 06 Jun 2005, Joe Heitman 11 Aug 2005
16. Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature. 2001;411:810–3. doi: 10.1038/35081095. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Deleault NR, Geoghegan JC, Nishina K, Kascsak R, Williamson RA, Supattapone S. Protease-resistant prion protein amplification reconstituted with partially purified substrates and synthetic polyanions. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:26873–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503973200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Deleault NR, Harris BT, Rees JR, Supattapone S. Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9741–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702662104. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Castilla J, Morales R, Saá P, Barria M, Gambetti P, Soto C. Cell-free propagation of prion strains. EMBO J. 2008;27:2557–66. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.181. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Castilla J, Gonzalez-Romero D, Saá P, Morales R, De Castro J, Soto C. Crossing the species barrier by PrP(Sc) replication in vitro generates unique infectious prions. Cell. 2008;134:757–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.030. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 3.2 Recommended
Evaluated by Jose Valpuesta 16 Oct 2008, Art Horwich 20 Oct 2008
21. Green KM, Castilla J, Seward TS, Napier DL, Jewell JE, Soto C, Telling GC. Accelerated high fidelity prion amplification within and across prion species barriers. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4:e1000139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Wang F, Wang X, Yuan CG, Ma J. Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science. 2010;327:1132–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1183748. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6.0 Must Read
Evaluated by David Lynn 13 Apr 2010
23. Kong Q, Surewicz WK, Petersen RB, Zou W, Chen SG, Gambetti P. Inherited prion diseases. In: Prusiner SB, editor. Prion Biology and Diseases. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2004. pp. 673–775.
24. Mead S. Prion disease genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:273–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201544. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Telling GC. Transgenic mouse models of prion diseases. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;459:249–63. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-234-2_17. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Dossena S, Imeri L, Mangieri M, Garofoli A, Ferrari L, Senatore A, Restelli E, Balducci C, Fiordaliso F, Salio M, Bianchi S, Fioriti L, Morbin M, Pincherle A, Marcon G, Villani F, Carli M, Tagliavini F, Forloni G, Chiesa R. Mutant prion protein expression causes motor and memory deficits and abnormal sleep patterns in a transgenic mouse model. Neuron. 2008;60:598–609. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.008. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Jackson WS, Borkowski AW, Faas H, Steele AD, King OD, Watson N, Jasanoff A, Lindquist S. Spontaneous generation of prion infectivity in fatal familial insomnia knockin mice. Neuron. 2009;63:438–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.026. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Nazor KE, Kuhn F, Seward T, Green M, Zwald D, Pürro M, Schmid J, Biffiger K, Power AM, Oesch B, Raeber AJ, Telling GC. Immunodetection of disease-associated mutant PrP, which accelerates disease in GSS transgenic mice. EMBO J. 2005;24:2472–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600717. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
29. Sigurdson CJ, Nilsson KP, Hornemann S, Heikenwalder M, Manco G, Schwarz P, Ott D, Rülicke T, Liberski PP, Julius C, Falsig J, Stitz L, Wüthrich K, Aguzzi A. De novo generation of a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by mouse transgenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:304–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810680105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 9.0 Exceptional
Evaluated by Samuel Gandy 04 Feb 2009
30. Fischer M, Rülicke T, Raeber A, Sailer A, Moser M, Oesch B, Brandner S, Aguzzi A, Weissmann C. Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie. EMBO J. 1996;15:1255–64. [PubMed]
31. Kretzschmar HA, Ironside JW, DeArmond SJ, Tateishi J. Diagnostic criteria for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:913–20. [PubMed]
32. Prusiner SB. Prions. Sci Am. 1984;251:50–9. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1084-50. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Peretz D, Williamson RA, Legname G, Matsunaga Y, Vergara J, Burton DR, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB, Scott MR. A change in the conformation of prions accompanies the emergence of a new prion strain. Neuron. 2002;34:921–32. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00726-2. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from F1000 Biology Reports are provided here courtesy of Faculty of 1000 Ltd