PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of f1000bioLatest ContentReportsReportsReports
 
F1000 Biol Rep. 2009; 1: 79.
Published online 2009 October 29. doi:  10.3410/B1-79
PMCID: PMC2948278

Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) proteins as drug targets for the treatment of cancer

Abstract

Three companies, Genentech, Aegera Therapeutics/Human Genome Sciences, and Novartis, have commenced phase 1 clinical trials of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) antagonist ‘Smac mimetic’ compounds for the treatment of cancer. These trials represent the culmination of a line of research that commenced with analysis of how insect viruses stop host cells from killing themselves and led to the discovery of a family of proteins that regulate development in insects and signalling by tumour necrosis factor superfamily members in mammals, which prompted development of drugs that mimic natural IAP-binding proteins to promote cell death.

Introduction and context

Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins were identified by Lois Miller and colleagues [1] in a screen for baculoviral genes that could prevent apoptosis of insect cells infected with a virus in which the caspase-inhibitory gene p35 was mutated. Analysis of the sequence of this IAP showed that it bore two domains, termed baculoviral IAP repeats (BIRs), and a carboxy-terminal RING domain. In mammals, four proteins that have one or more BIR domains and a carboxy-terminal RING domain have been identified, namely cellular IAP 1 (cIAP1)/BIRC2, cIAP2/BIRC3, X-linked IAP protein (XIAP)/BIRC4, and melanoma IAP protein (ML-IAP)/BIRC7 [2] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1) and cIAP2 have three baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat (BIR) domains

Increased expression of these IAPs has been observed in many types of cancer. For example, the locus encompassing cIAP1 and cIAP2 is amplified in hepatocellular carcinomas, high levels of XIAP have been reported in cervical cancers, and ML-IAP levels are high in melanoma. In addition, cIAP2 is involved in translocations seen in MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue) lymphomas. Associations such as these suggest that IAPs might be oncogenic, and if so, targeting them pharmaceutically might be therapeutic [3].

Clues to the identification of natural IAP antagonists came from studying IAPs in Drosophila, which has two BIR-containing proteins with carboxy-terminal RING domains: Drosophila IAP protein 1 (DIAP1) and DIAP2 [4]. Deletion of DIAP1 leads to massive inappropriate cell death during development, resulting in embryonal lethality. Mutations in DIAP1 also enhanced cell death caused by overexpression of the small pro-apoptotic protein Reaper [5]. Subsequently, it was shown that Reaper and proteins encoded by three closely linked genes, grim, hid, and sickle, bound directly to the second BIR of DIAP1 and blocked its anti-apoptotic function [6].

Mammalian IAP-binding proteins were identified by mass spectrometric analysis of proteins co-immunoprecipitating with IAPs from cell lysates [7,8]. These mitochondrial proteins, including Smac/Diablo and HtrA2/Omi, bore processed amino-termini similar to the amino-termini of Reaper, Grim, HID, and Sickle [9]. Crystallisation of a Smac-BIR3 of XIAP complex [10] showed that the key interaction was between the four conserved amino-terminal amino acids of the IAP-binding protein with a hydrophobic pocket on the surface of the BIR.

Peptido-mimetic IAP-antagonist compounds (IACs) that resemble the amino-termini of the IAP-binding proteins have been designed to allow pharmacological antagonism of IAPs. Experiments using these compounds have revealed that they cause apoptosis by modifying tumour necrosis factor (TNF) signalling pathways [11-14].

Despite its name, TNF is only very rarely able to cause cell death on its own and must be combined with inhibitors of transcription or translation, such as actinomycin D or cycloheximide. This implied activity of certain ‘survival’ genes prevented death of cells treated with TNF alone. Observations that cells lacking the nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-κB) component p65/RelA were susceptible to TNF alone suggested that the survival genes were driven by NF-κB [15].

Major recent advances

The first connection between IAPs and TNF signalling pathways came with the identification of cIAP1 and cIAP2 in a complex with TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) and TRAF2 that bound to the cytoplasmic domain of TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2) [16]. Subsequently, it was shown that BIR1 of cIAP1 allows it to bind to the TRAFs [17,18].

More recently, it was found that mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) mutant for cIAP1 could be killed by TNF alone, just like p65/RelA mutant MEFs [12]. This, and experiments in which TNF activation of NF-κB was studied in cells depleted of cIAP1, cIAP2, or both [19,20], revealed that cIAPs are needed for TNF to activate p65/RelA NF-κB.

Remarkably, addition of an IAC to cells causes cIAP1 to be ubiquitylated and degraded in under half an hour [11-14] (Figure 2). In some cells, XIAP also disappears, but it usually takes longer and might sometimes be due to cleavage by caspases rather than by the proteasome. By depleting cells of cIAP1 and cIAP2, IACs have cast a new light on what these IAPs actually do.

Figure 2.
Inhibitor of apoptosis antagonist compounds (IACs) trigger dimerization-dependent autoubiquitylation and degradation of inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs)

TNF alone can kill cIAP1 mutant MEFs and MEFs pretreated with IACs but does not kill XIAP mutant MEFs [12]. This suggests that, in the TNF-triggered death pathway, the targets of IACs are the cIAPs rather than XIAP, and because XIAP is the only IAP that directly inhibits caspase activity [21], it means that IACs do not kill purely by relieving caspase inhibition. Even so, antagonism of XIAP might be important for blocking other death pathways as cIAP-selective antagonists are less potent in promoting apoptosis than pan-selective compounds [22], and sensitisation to other death receptor ligands might require inhibition of XIAP in certain types of cells [23].

Cell lines that are killed by IACs produce autocrine TNF, and blocking TNF receptors prevents the cells from dying. But IACs also sensitise cells to the addition of death receptor ligands such as TNF, Fas ligand, or TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). This implies that one of the normal functions of cIAPs is to prevent or reduce activation of caspase 8 in response to death ligands (Figure 3).

Figure 3.
Signalling in response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is regulated by inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs)

MEFs treated with IACs, or those in which genes for cIAP1 or TRAF2 are deleted, have constitutively elevated levels of NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) [11,12], and activation of the downstream non-canonical NF-κB pathway, evidenced by low levels of NF-κB2/p100 relative to its product NF-κB2/p52 (Figure 4). Activation of this transcription factor pathway might explain the autocrine production of TNF in some cell types. The activation of NIK when cIAPs are depleted suggests that a normal role for cIAPs and TRAFs is to channel NF-κB signalling toward the p65/RelA pathway and away from the NIK-activated pathway. For example, when cIAP1 is genetically deleted, phosphorylation and activation of p65/RelA in response to TNF are greatly reduced and delayed, whereas NIK levels are elevated, even in the absence of cytokine stimulation (Figure 4).

Figure 4.
In the absence of tumour necrosis factor (TNF), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1) constitutively suppresses nuclear factor-kappa-B (NF-κB)-inducing kinase (NIK) abundance

So how is TNF able to activate E3 activity of cIAP1 and cIAP2? Like XIAP, cIAP1 and cIAP2 bear carboxy-terminal RING domains, which allow them to act as ubiquitin ligases [24]. IAPs can hetero- and homo-dimerise via their RINGs, which seems to activate them, allowing them to associate with an E2 and leading to their auto-ubiquitylation and degradation by the proteasome [25] (Figure 2). Although it is clear that binding of an IAC to the BIR of an IAP results in activation of its RING, exactly how they do so it not known as the three-dimensional structure of a whole IAP has not yet been determined.

Mutation of residues at the very end of a cIAP1’s RING greatly increases its half-life, but these mutants lose anti-apoptotic activity. This suggests that cIAP1 must dimerise at their RINGs in order to activate, and then they ubiquitylate themselves and other associated proteins, such as receptor-interacting serine/threonine kinase 1 (RIPK1) [19,20,26,27], caspases [28], or Smac/Diablo [18]. It is possible that, when cells are exposed to IACs, the IAPs autoubiquitylate and destroy themselves, so they are no longer able to ubiquitylate their physiological targets. This prevents p65/RelA from being activated, while NIK is stabilised, causing processing and activation of p100/NF-κB2 signalling and autocrine production of TNF.

When IACs were given to mice bearing xenograft tumours, the malignant cells were killed, apparently without stimulation of a TNF cytokine storm causing severe side effects [11,13]. This was encouragement enough to commence phase I trials in humans, but as yet, no results from Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA, USA), Aegera Therapeutics Inc. (Montreal, QC, Canada)/Human Genome Sciences (Rockville, MD, USA), or Novartis (Basel, Switzerland) have been reported.

Future directions

Many puzzles remain to be solved in the lab: How does binding of an IAC to the BIR lead to activation of the E3 ligase? What are the direct substrates of IAP E3 activity [RIPK1, RIPK2, Smac/Diablo, ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1), and caspases are among the reported substrates] [26,29-32]? Are these proteins modified by K48, K63, or linear linked ubiquitin? When cIAPs are doing their ‘day job’ of reducing NIK levels, do they have to be activated by a BIR-binding protein, and if so, what is it? What is the effect of deletion of both cIAP1 and cIAP2? What are the differences between cIAP1 and cIAP2, and what is the role of the caspase recruitment domains and ubiquitin-associated domains in these proteins? We will have to wait and see, just as we will for the clinical trials, which will reveal whether IACs will be therapeutically useful, either as a single agent or in combination with TRAIL or conventional chemotherapy.

Acknowledgements

The author is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and a Center Grant from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

Abbreviations

ASK1
apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1
BIR
baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat
cIAP
cellular inhibitor of apoptosis
DIAP
Drosophila inhibitor of apoptosis
HID
head involution defective
HtrA2
high temperature requirement A2
IAC
inhibitor of apoptosis antagonist compound
IAP
inhibitor of apoptosis
MALT
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblast
ML-IAP
melanoma inhibitor or apoptosis
NF-κB
nuclear factor-kappa-B
NIK
nuclear factor-kappa-B-inducing kinase
RIPK1
receptor (TNFRSF)-interacting serine-threonine kinase 1
Smac
second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase
TNF
tumour necrosis factor
TNFR
TNF receptor
TNFRSF
TNFR superfamily
TRAF
TNFR-associated factor
TRAIL
TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand
XIAP
X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis

Notes

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found at: http://www.F1000.com/Reports/Biology/content/1/79

Notes

Competing interests

The author is on the Scientific Advisory Board of TetraLogic Pharmaceuticals (Malvern, PA, USA).

References

1. Crook NE, Clem RJ, Miller LK. An apoptosis inhibiting baculovirus gene with a zinc finger like motif. J Virol. 1993;67:2168–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Salvesen GS, Duckett CS. IAP proteins: blocking the road to death’s door. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002;3:401–10. doi: 10.1038/nrm830. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. LaCasse EC, Mahoney DJ, Cheung HH, Plenchette S, Baird S, Korneluk RG. IAP-targeted therapies for cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:6252–75. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.302. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Hay BA, Wassarman DA, Rubin GM. Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell. 1995;83:1253–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90150-7. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. White K, Grether ME, Abrams JM, Young L, Farrell K, Steller H. Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila. Science. 1994;264:677–83. doi: 10.1126/science.8171319. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Vucic D, Kaiser WJ, Harvey AJ, Miller LK. Inhibition of reaper-induced apoptosis by interaction with inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:10183–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10183. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Silke J, Connolly LM, Reid GE, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ, Vaux DL. Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell. 2000;102:43–53. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00009-X. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6.0 Must Read
Evaluated by Alun M Davies 03 Dec 2001
8. Du CY, Fang M, Li YC, Li L, Wang XD. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell. 2000;102:33–42. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00008-8. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6 Must Read
Evaluated by Alun M Davies 03 Dec 2001
9. Silke J, Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Vaux DL. Sequence as well as functional similarity for DIABLO/Smac and Grim, Reaper and Hid? Cell Death Differ. 2000;7:1275. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400790. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Wu G, Chai JJ, Suber TL, Wu JW, Du CY, Wang XD, Shi YG. Structural basis of IAP recognition by Smac/DIABLO. Nature. 2000;408:1008–12. doi: 10.1038/35050012. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Varfolomeev E, Blankenship JW, Wayson SM, Fedorova AV, Kayagaki N, Garg P, Zobel K, Dynek JN, Elliott LO, Wallweber HJ, Flygare JA, Fairbrother WJ, Deshayes K, Dixit VM, Vucic D. IAP antagonists induce autoubiquitination of c-IAPs, NF-kappaB activation, and TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis. Cell. 2007;131:669–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 4.8 Must Read
Evaluated by David Wallach 21 Dec 2007, Shiv Pillai 26 Feb 2008
12. Vince JE, Wong WW, Khan N, Feltham R, Chau D, Ahmed AU, Benetatos CA, Chunduru SK, Condon SM, McKinlay M, Brink R, Leverkus M, Tergaonkar V, Schneider P, Callus BA, Koentgen F, Vaux DL, Silke J. IAP antagonists target cIAP1 to induce TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis. Cell. 2007;131:682–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.037. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 3.0 Recommended
Evaluated by David Wallach 21 Dec 2007
13. Gaither A, Porter D, Yao Y, Borawski J, Yang G, Donovan J, Sage D, Slisz J, Tran M, Straub C, Ramsey T, Iourgenko V, Huang A, Chen Y, Schlegel R, Labow M, Fawell S, Sellers WR, Zawel L. A Smac mimetic rescue screen reveals roles for inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11493–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5173. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Petersen SL, Wang L, Yalcin-Chin A, Li L, Peyton M, Minna J, Harran P, Wang X. Autocrine TNFalpha signaling renders human cancer cells susceptible to Smac-mimetic-induced apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2007;12:445–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.029. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Wang CY, Mayo MW, Baldwin AS. TNF- and cancer therapy-induced apoptosis: potentiation by inhibition of NF-kappaB. Science. 1996;274:784–7. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.784. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Rothe M, Pan MG, Henzel WJ, Ayres TM, Goeddel DV. The TNFR2-TRAF signaling complex contains two novel proteins related to baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. Cell. 1995;83:1243–52. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90149-3. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Varfolomeev E, Wayson SM, Dixit VM, Fairbrother WJ, Vucic D. The inhibitor of apoptosis protein fusion c-IAP2.MALT1 stimulates NF-kappaB activation independently of TRAF1 AND TRAF2. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29022–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605116200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
18. Samuel T, Welsh K, Lober T, Togo SH, Zapata JM, Reed JC. Distinct BIR domains of cIAP1 mediate binding to and ubiquitination of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2 and second mitochondrial activator of caspases. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:1080–90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509381200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Mahoney DJ, Cheung HH, Mrad RL, Plenchette S, Simard C, Enwere E, Arora V, Mak TW, Lacasse EC, Waring J, Korneluk RG. Both cIAP1 and cIAP2 regulate TNFalpha-mediated NF-kappaB activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11778–83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711122105. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 3.0 Recommended
Evaluated by Kristina Vuori 25 Sep 2008
20. Varfolomeev E, Goncharov T, Fedorova AV, Dynek JN, Zobel K, Deshayes K, Fairbrother WJ, Vucic D. c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 are critical mediators of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha)-induced NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24295–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800128200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Eckelman BP, Salvesen GS, Scott FL. Human inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: why XIAP is the black sheep of the family. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:988–94. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400795. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Ndubaku C, Varfolomeev E, Wang L, Zobel K, Lau K, Elliott LO, Maurer B, Fedorova AV, Dynek JN, Koehler M, Hymowitz SG, Tsui V, Deshayes K, Fairbrother WJ, Flygare JA, Vucic D. Antagonism of c-IAP and XIAP proteins is required for efficient induction of cell death by small-molecule IAP antagonists. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:557–66. doi: 10.1021/cb900083m. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
23. Jost PJ, Grabow S, Gray D, McKenzie MD, Nachbur U, Huang DC, Bouillet P, Thomas HE, Borner C, Silke J, Strasser A, Kaufmann T. XIAP discriminates between type I and type II FAS-induced apoptosis. Nature. 2009;460:1035–9. doi: 10.1038/nature08229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6.0 Must Read
Evaluated by Andreas Villunger 16 Sep 2009
24. Silke J, Kratina T, Chu D, Ekert PG, Day CL, Pakusch M, Huang DC, Vaux DL. Determination of cell survival by RING-mediated regulation of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein abundance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16182–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502828102. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
25. Mace PD, Linke K, Feltham R, Schumacher FR, Smith CA, Vaux DL, Silke J, Day CL. Structures of the cIAP2 RING domain reveal conformational changes associated with ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) recruitment. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:31633–40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804753200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Bertrand MJ, Milutinovic S, Dickson KM, Ho WC, Boudreault A, Durkin J, Gillard JW, Jaquith JB, Morris SJ, Barker PA. cIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2008;30:689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.014. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 6.0 Must Read
Evaluated by Hao Wu 01 Oct 2008
27. Wang L, Du F, Wang X. TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell. 2008;133:693–703. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.036. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Huang HK, Joazeiro CAP, Bonfoco E, Kamada S, Leverson JD, Hunter T. The inhibitor of apoptosis, cIAP2, functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes in vitro monoubiquitination of caspases 3 and 7. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26661–4. [PubMed]
29. Bertrand MJ, Doiron K, Labbe K, Korneluk RG, Barker PA, Saleh M. Cellular inhibitors of apoptosis cIAP1 and cIAP2 are required for innate immunity signaling by the pattern recognition receptors NOD1 and NOD2. Immunity. 2009;30:789–801. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.011. [PubMed] [Cross Ref] F1000 Factor 3.0 Recommended
Evaluated by Neal Silverman 12 June 2009
30. Choi YE, Butterworth M, Malladi S, Duckett CS, Cohen GM, Bratton SB. The E3 ubiquitin ligase cIAP1 binds and ubiquitinates caspase-3 and -7 via unique mechanisms at distinct steps in their processing. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:12772–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807550200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Hu S, Yang X. Cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 and 2 are ubiquitin ligases for the apoptosis inducer Smac/DIABLO. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:10055–60. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207197200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
32. Zhao Y, Conze DB, Hanover JA, Ashwell JD. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 signaling induces selective c-IAP1-dependent ASK1 ubiquitination and terminates mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:7777–82. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609146200. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Gyrd-Hansen M, Darding M, Miasari M, Santoro MM, Zender L, Xue W, Tenev T, da Fonseca PC, Zvelebil M, Bujnicki JM, Lowe S, Silke J, Meier P. IAPs contain an evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin-binding domain that regulates NF-kappaB as well as cell survival and oncogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1309–17. doi: 10.1038/ncb1789. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from F1000 Biology Reports are provided here courtesy of Faculty of 1000 Ltd