Aspirin, NSAIDs, and COX-2 Selective Inhibitors
Beginning in the 1980s and 1990s, several case-control studies, followed by prospective cohort studies, consistently associated aspirin use with a lower risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma.
284–299 Clinical observations and case series studies, later corroborated by the results of randomized control trials, also demonstrated that NSAIDs such as sulindac and the COX-2 selective inhibitor celecoxib reduced the adenomatous polyp burden among patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.
300–307 Subsequently, 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of aspirin provided compelling evidence that aspirin directly inhibits sporadic carcinogenesis; each trial demonstrated that short-term aspirin use reduces the risk of adenoma recurrence in patients with a prior history of colorectal neoplasia.
151, 308–310 A recent meta-analysis of these trials found that aspirin users had pooled risk ratio of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72–0.96) for any adenoma and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.57–0.90) for advanced adenomas.
311 Although 2 large trials, the PHS and the Women’s Health Study, failed to confirm that aspirin protects against colorectal cancer,
312, 313 these findings could reflect the low doses of aspirin used or insufficient duration of treatment or follow-up. In support of this explanation, the NHS and HPFS,
314, 315 as well as a secondary analysis of data from 2 other randomized trials, found that long-term use of higher doses of aspirin protect against colorectal cancer.
316 A dose-dependent relationship is also apparent based on findings from a separate analyses of NHS participants which showed that higher doses of aspirin, especially among women with
UGT1A6 polymorphisms that impair aspirin metabolism, were inversely associated with adenoma formation.
317, 318 This finding was also observed in other cohorts.
319
Three recent randomized trials showed that the COX-2 selective inhibitors celecoxib and rofecoxib prevented adenoma recurrence among patients with a prior history of adenoma.
320–322 In the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) trial, adenoma recurrence was reduced by 33%–45% in patients that received 3 years of treatment with celecoxib.
322 Unfortunately, the APC trial identified a dose-dependent, 3-fold higher risk of cardiovascular events, which was also observed in a study of rofecoxib.
323–326 This subsequently led to the withdrawal of rofecoxib from the market. However, a recent pooled analysis of 6 randomized control trials of celecoxib in patients with non-arthritis indications found that celecoxib (400 mg twice each day) was not associated with increased cardiovascular risk among patients with low baseline risk of cardiovascular disease.
327 Moreover, in the APC trial, a planned 5-year efficacy analysis found that a previous history of atherosclerotic heart disease was the only risk factor that significantly interacted with celecoxib use in the association with cardiovascular events.
328 Taken together, this data indicate that celecoxib is relatively safe for individuals that are at low risk for cardiovascular disorders. Unfortunately, many risk factors for colorectal cancer (e.g. body mass index, physical inactivity) overlap with those of cardiovascular disease.
329
Although there have been many observational studies supporting a role for non-aspirin, non-COX-2 selective, NSAIDs in colorectal cancer prevention,
271, 284–287, 289–291, 296–299, 330–346 randomized trial data are limited. The NSAID sulindac has been shown to reduce polyp burden in patients with FAP.
301, 303 For sporadic adenoma, data are limited to a trial of patients with a history of adenoma that examined the effects of a combination of sulindac and the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor difluoromethylornitine (DFMO), compared with those of placebo. This combination was selected because of the ability of these reagents to synergistically reduce levels of colonic polyamines (e.g., putrescine, spermidine, and spermine), which are believed to be pro-carcinogenic. DFMO inhibits polyamine synthesis,
347 whereas sulindac is believed to increase polyamine acetylation and export. In this small trial, the combination of DFMO and sulindac reduced the risk of recurrent adenoma by 70%. Although there were concerns about potential adverse effects of DFMO on hearing, there was no significant difference reported in hearing changes or audiogram results from patients given DFMO compared to those given placebo.
348 However, as observed in patients given COX-2–selective NSAIDs, there appeared to be a higher incidence of cardiovascular toxicity among patients with a high baseline risk of cardiovascular events that were given sulindac.
349 Because the trial was not designed to examine sulindac and DFMO separately, it is uncertain if either agent used alone is an effective chemopreventive.
There have been many proposed mechanisms by which aspirin, NSAIDs, and COX-2 selective inhibitors reduce risk of colorectal neoplasia (). However, perhaps the most compelling hypothesis is related to the ability of these agents to inhibit COX-2. A specific role for COX-2 in colorectal neoplasia is supported by several lines of evidence: 1) disruption of
COX-2 inhibits development of polyps in mice with a mutation in
APC; 350 2) host expression of COX-2, but not COX-1, is required for survival of mouse tumor xenografts;
351 3) COX-2, but not COX-1, is progressively overexpressed in human colorectal adenomas and cancers;
352, 353 4)
COX-2 expression is highly upregulated, even in morphologically normal mucosa of
APC
min mice and humans with colorectal cancer.
354 We recently showed in a large cohort of men and women that regular aspirin use reduced the risk of colorectal cancers that overexpress COX-2 but not the risk of colorectal cancers with weak or absent expression of COX-2.
355 These data indicate that aspirin likely affects the formation of adenomas and cancer by inhibiting COX-2. Similarly, a secondary analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin found that genetic variations in
COX-2 can modify the effect of aspirin treatment on risk of recurrent adenoma.
356 Nonetheless, aspirin and NSAIDs have other potential anti-cancer mechanisms that are unrelated to cyclooxygenase, including inhibition of nuclear factor-κB,
357 induction of apoptosis by activation of p38 kinase,
358 and catabolism of polyamines, as previously discussed.
359
The preceding body of evidence was considered by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in reaching a consensus statement regarding aspirin and NSAIDs for the prevention of colorectal cancer. The USPSTF concluded that overall, harms outweighed the benefits of aspirin and NSAID use for the prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic adults who are at average risk for colorectal cancer.
360 For COX-2-selective agents and NSAIDs, concerns about potential cardiovascular events are particularly limiting, as well as the risk of gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding.
361 Although aspirin appears to have a more favorable cardiovascular profile,
362–364 hemorrhagic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding remain a concern, especially with long-term use.
315 The USPSTF did advocate further investigation into optimizing the risk-benefit profile of aspirin for the purpose of cancer prevention.
365 A recent international consensus panel reached a similar conclusion, advocating that additional research be conducted into the use of aspirin in high-risk populations for which benefits might outweigh the harms.
366
Such a subgroup would likely include individuals with established colorectal cancer that have undergone a resection for curative intent. Although such patients generally enjoy a favorable prognosis compared to patients diagnosed with unresectable disease, they remain at high risk of recurrence and death from the disease. Thus, we recently examined, among 1,279 patients with established Stage I, II, III colorectal cancers enrolled in the NHS and HPFS, whether aspirin use can influence prognosis. We found that use of aspirin after diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival from the disease. Compared with non-users, participants who regularly used aspirin after diagnosis had a 29% reduction in colorectal-cancer specific mortality and a 21% reduction of overall mortality. Regular aspirin use after diagnosis was associated with a particularly low risk of colorectal-cancer specific mortality among participants in whom primary tumors overexpressed COX-2. Therefore, aspirin might influence the biology of established colorectal tumors, in addition to preventing their occurrence. Moreover, COX-2 or related markers might be used to determine which patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer are most likely to respond to anti-COX-2 directed therapies.
367 A study performed in women with colorectal cancer also supports an effect of NSAIDs on survival.
368 Nonetheless, randomized trials are needed to confirm these results before routine clinical recommendations can be implemented.
In summary, aspirin and COX-2 selective inhibitors reduce the risk of colorectal neoplasia. Presently, their routine use is not recommended for prevention of colorectal cancer in the general population due to concern about their associated toxicities. However, there are specific populations in which the potential benefit associated with their use may outweigh the risks.
Post-Menopausal Hormones
Differences in sex hormones might account for the fact that the ratio of women to men with colorectal cancer is lower before age 50–54 years (i.e. for premenopausal women) than after (i.e. for postmenopausal women).
369, 370 This observation stimulated research into whether postmenopausal hormones reduce risk of colorectal cancer. Estrogens have been proposed to alter bile acid composition, modulate colonic transit,
371 and decrease production of mitogenic insulin-like growth factor-1.
372 Colorectal epithelium expresses estrogen receptors, which might be modulated by age-related promoter hypermethylation.
373 Colon cancers also express estrogen receptor-β, which might modulate the effect of exogenous estrogens on tumor growth. With a few exceptions,
374–376 most prospective studies show an inverse association between use of postmenopausal hormones and risk of colorectal cancer.
239, 377–393 Similarly, most studies have also shown an inverse association between postmenopausal hormone use and risk of colorectal adenoma.
394–398 Based on data from the NHS, postmenopausal hormone use was associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (multivariate RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50–0.83) and large colorectal adenoma (≥ 1cm in diameter) (multivariate RR, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.55–0.99).
399 These results were confirmed in a 2 separate meta-analyses of epidemiological studies.
400, 401
These observational results were subsequently confirmed in the WHI estrogen plus progestin randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted among nearly 17,000 post-menopausal women. In that trial, after a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up, estrogen and progestin were associated with a 37% reduction in colorectal cancer risk, comparable with the results from prospective, observational studies. However, these results were tempered by a finding that colorectal cancers in women who were given estrogen plus progestin were diagnosed at a more advanced stage than those of patients that received placebo.
402 In contrast, the WHI estrogen-alone trial did not show any benefit for colorectal cancer.
403 This is in agreement with most observational studies that have also shown an inverse association between colorectal cancer and the combination of estrogen plus progestin, but not for estrogen-alone.
388, 404, 405 Of note, one recent study did observe that long duration estrogen-alone therapy but not estrogen plus progestin is associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer.
406
In summary, although postmenopausal hormone therapy appears to be associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer, it remains unclear which preparations of estrogen-alone or estrogen plus progestin are optimal. Moreover, because postmenopausal hormones increase the risk of breast cancer and cardiovascular events,
402 the associated balance of risks and benefits do not support a recommendation of use of postmenopausal hormones as a means of preventing colorectal cancer.
407
The Overall Potential of Primary Prevention
Based on the dietary, lifestyle, and medication risk factors we have outlined, there is substantial potential for primary prevention of colorectal cancer through modification of several environmental influences. For dietary factors, although controversy exists regarding the role of specific nutritional elements, consideration of the dietary pattern as a whole might be useful for formulating recommendations. For example, several studies have shown that high intake of red and processed meats, high-fat dairy products, highly refined grains and starches, and sugars are related to a higher risk of colon cancer. Thus, replacing these factors with poultry, fish and plant sources as the primary source of protein; mono-unsaturated, and poly-unsaturated fats as the primary source of fat; and unrefined grains, legumes and fruits as the primary source of carbohydrates is likely to lower risk of colorectal cancer. This benefit is likely to be sustained irrespective of whether the independent benefit of each component or their precise anti-cancer mechanisms is established. Although the role for many supplements, including vitamin D, folate, and B6, remains largely uncertain, calcium supplementation is likely at least modestly beneficial, particularly in those with low intake of dietary calcium. Vitamin D intakes of 1000–2000 IU/day might improve overall health status and possibly lower risk of colorectal cancer.
For lifestyle factors, there is compelling evidence that avoidance of smoking and heavy alcohol use, prevention of weight gain, and the maintenance of a reasonable level of physical activity can each have a positive influence on risk of colorectal cancer. In addition, there is strong evidence that medications such as aspirin and NSAIDs are effective chemopreventive drugs. Certain preparations of postmenopausal hormones might also be associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer. Although none of these agents are recommended for widespread primary prevention due to their side effect profile, they provide proof-of-principle of the potential to translate epidemiological findings into clinically efficacious chemopreventive drug interventions.
Taken together, modification of multiple diet and lifestyle factors is likely to have a substantial overall impact on risk of colorectal cancer. In a previous study of the HPFS, as many as 70% of the overall burden of colon cancers in the U.S. population could be prevented through moderate changes in diet and lifestyle.
408 Using population-based projections, a separate study reached similar conclusions, albeit with more modest estimates of benefit.
409 To further integrate the combined effect of modifiable risk factors, we recently developed a comprehensive model of colon cancer incidence that accounted for changes in the influence of risk factors throughout the lifespan. We found that women with profiles of modifiable lifestyle factors that were “high risk” had a nearly 4-fold higher risk of colon cancer compared with women with “low-risk” profiles ().
410 Although endoscopic screening could reduce cancer incidence among these high-risk women, their risk remained significantly higher than women whose lifestyle behaviors placed them in the moderate- or low-risk categories (). Thus, primary prevention of colorectal cancer through lifestyle changes is an important complement to colorectal cancer screening in reducing colon cancer incidence. Moreover, because many diet and lifestyle risk factors for colorectal cancer overlap with other chronic illnesses, including cardiovascular disease, further research into these risk factors would have benefits beyond prevention of colorectal cancer.