|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Obesity has been increasing in prevalence worldwide and the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes are either overweight or obese. Diabetes management in this population has been difficult since a number of antidiabetes agents are associated with weight gain. The effects of various antidiabetes agents and antiobesity agents on glycemic control and body weight will be reviewed. Briefly, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin are associated with weight gain, whereas metformin and amylin analogs are weight neutral or associated with modest weight loss. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors are weight neutral, whereas glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs are associated with weight loss. The effect of orlistat and sibutramine in type 2 diabetes is also evaluated. The treatment of diabetes should not only focus on glycemic control as its sole intention, but it should factor in the effect of these various agents on weight, as well, since obesity aggravates insulin resistance, beta cell failure, and cardiovascular risk.
Obesity has been increasing in prevalence worldwide and is strongly associated with the development of type 2 diabetes . Both obesity and diabetes are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality primarily from cardiovascular disease. Currently, about 86% of patients with type 2 diabetes are either overweight or obese . Obesity, particularly intra-abdominal obesity, induces insulin resistance in muscle and liver that leads to glucose intolerance . Consequently, insulin resistance has long been targeted for diabetes control. Additionally, progressive loss of pancreatic beta cell function hallmarks the central defect in diabetes and is related to loss of incretin stimulation, amylin production, and the effects of glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity . Hence, medical treatment of diabetes has collectively targeted these various pathophysiological mechanisms.
Intensive lifestyle modification with diet and exercise to achieve weight loss of at least 5–10% has been shown to improve glycemic control with improvements in insulin sensitivity and beta cell function . Intensive glucose lowering of HbA1c levels to less than 7% is associated with significant reduction in microvascular complications . However, as has been shown in a number of prospective trials including the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), intensive glucose control is associated with a median weight gain of 3–3.5kg. A more recent example of this effect is illustrated by the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial which compared standard therapy (HbA1c 7–7.9%) with intensive glucose control (<6%) in over 10,000 subjects . More patients in the intensive group had significant weight gain of >10kg (28% versus 14%). For every 1% decrease in HbA1c, there was a corresponding weight gain of about 2kg . Thus, the effect of antidiabetes agents on weight and obesity status is an important consideration when treating patients with diabetes since obesity, itself, aggravates insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk.
A number of medications including sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin are associated with weight gain particularly when used in combination, whereas metformin and amylin analogs are weight neutral or associated with modest weight loss. DPP4-inhibitors are weight neutral whereas GLP-1 analogs are associated with weight loss (Figure 1). The effect of various antidiabetes medication classes on glycemic control and weight will be reviewed here. Based on a practice-based approach, a therapeutic strategy that balances weight and glucose control for obese type 2 diabetic patients will be presented in Figure 2 that is distinct from the conventional glucose lowering approach .
The sulfonylureas (SUs) have been extensively used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and are associated with weight gain. SUs stimulate pancreatic betacells directly to secrete insulin independent of glucose concentrations. SUs, when used as monotherapy, are expected to decrease HbA1c by 1-2% [10, 11]. In UKPDS, 3,867 newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to intensive treatment with sulfonylurea (chlorpropamide 100–500mg or glibenclamide 2.5–20mg), insulin, or conventional dietary management . The median HbA1c of 7.0% in the intensive group was significantly lower compared with the conventional treatment (7.9%) over the 10-year study period. However, patients on the intensive treatment group had greater weight gain (mean 2.9kg; P < .001) than the conventional group. Patients on glibenclamide gained 1.7kg more than the conventional group whereas those on insulin gained 4.0kg more.
To determine the effects of SU when combined with metformin, Garber et al. conducted a multicenter, double-blind study in which 486 type 2 diabetes patients (mean HbA1c ~8.7%) were randomized to glyburide/metformin therapy (1.25/250mg), glyburide (2.5mg), or metformin (500mg) monotherapy with titration to maximum doses for 16 weeks . There was greater reduction in HbA1c (−2.27%) in the glyburide/metformin group compared with both glyburide (−1.90%) and metformin (−1.53%) monotherapy (P = .0003). Patients on glyburide/metformin treatment had a weight increase of 1.6kg compared with 2.0kg in the glyburide group (P = NS). In contrast, patients on metformin had a weight loss of 1.1kg. Thus, the combination of SU with metformin results in superior glycemic control with less weight gain than SU monotherapy.
Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) reduce hyperglycemia primarily by improving insulin sensitivity in adipose, skeletal muscle, and liver tissues. These compounds may also have some favorable effects to preserve beta cell function and prevent diabetes development in patients at high risk [13, 14]. TZDs are used as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or SUs in type 2 diabetes. In the Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events (PROactive) Study, 5,238 patients (mean HbA1c ~7.8%) were randomized to pioglitazone 15mg to 45mg (n = 2,605) or placebo (n = 2,633) in addition to their antidiabetes agents. Following the 34.5-month study period, the pioglitazone group achieved a reduction in HbA1c of 0.8% compared with 0.3% in the placebo group despite the addition of more antidiabetes agents in the placebo group . There was an associated weight gain of 3.6kg in the pioglitazone group as compared to a 0.4kg weight loss in the placebo group. Despite weight gain, pioglitazone improved some secondary cardiovascular outcomes with regard to composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke with multiple effects of lowering cholesterol and blood pressure.
The Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT) was done to evaluate rosiglitazone monotherapy on glycemic control compared with metformin or glyburide monotherapy. Patients (mean HbA1c ~7.4%) were randomized to receive maximum daily doses of rosiglitazone 8mg (n = 1,456), glyburide 15mg (n = 1,441), or metformin 2g (n = 1,454). At 4 years, 40% of patients in the rosiglitazone group had HbA1c <7%, as compared with 36% in the metformin group and 26% in the glyburide group . Weight gain was a major consistent finding with the use of TZDs. Over a period of 5 years, treatment with rosiglitazone resulted in an average weight gain of 4.8kg versus 1.6kg in the glyburide group whereas patients on metformin had a decrease in weight (−2.9kg). The weight gain associated with TZDs was postulated to be due to an increase in subcutaneous fat as a result of fat redistribution from visceral adipose tissues, which is related to major improvements in insulin sensitivity in hepatic and peripheral tissues .
The use of TZDs and metformin as an insulin-sensitizing strategy as compared to an insulin-providing strategy with SUs and insulin employed in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease enrolled in the BARI 2D trial had a greater likelihood of achieving glycemic control with HbA1c <7% (insulin-sensitizing 55% versus insulin-providing 40%). Insulin-sensitizing therapy also was associated with less weight gain and hypoglycemia compared with the insulin-providing therapy .
The combination of TZDs with incretin agonists discussed below balances both glycemic and weight control. The addition of exenatide 10μg twice daily to rosiglitazone 4mg twice daily resulted in weight loss of 1.2kg compared with weight gain of 1.5kg with rosiglitazone monotherapy. There was also a greater reduction in HbA1c in the combination therapy group (−1.3%versus − 1%; P < .05) .
By way of progressive loss of beta cell function, the majority of patients with diabetes will require insulin therapy to achieve glycemic control. Early initiation of multiple daily insulin injections allowed rapid achievement of glucose control and improvement in beta cell function . This effect was sustained for up to two years after discontinuation of insulin . Early intensive glucose control had been repeatedly shown to improve microvascular outcomes, however, at the expense of significant weight gain and hypoglycemia . Weight gain from insulin use is related to its effect to increase body fat and lean mass through reductions in glycosuria, anabolic effects on adipose tissue, as well as to appetite-enhancing effects . However, the type of basal insulin used may have different effects on weight. Rosenstock et al. compared the efficacy of insulin analogs detemir and glargine when added to oral glucose-lowering agents in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes subjects with baseline HbA1c of 8.6% in a 52-week, open-label treat-to-target trial . Treatment with insulin detemir (n = 291) and glargine (n = 291) resulted in a comparable decrease in HbA1c from 8.6 to 7.2 and 7.1%, respectively. However, there were modest reductions in weight gain seen with determir versus glargine (+3.0kgversus + 3.9kg, P = .01). Holman et al. conducted an open-label multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of basal insulin, prandial insulin, and biphasic insulin in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled (mean HbA1~8.5%) on oral hypoglycemic agents . Patients randomized to prandial insulin (n = 239) had a greater weight gain of 6.4 ± 0.5kg compared with patients on biphasic insulin (n = 235) with weight gain of 5.7 ± 0.5kg and basal insulin (n=234) of 3.6 ± 0.5kg. Clearly, the weight gain associated with insulin is a major drawback for treating diabetes. Further studies examining the effects of antiobesity drugs and GLP-1 agonists to combat insulin-induced weight gain are needed.
Metformin is an insulin sensitizing agent that serves as the first line agent in treatment of type 2 diabetes and acts by decreasing hepatic glucose production and enhances peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin. It has been shown to significantly delay the progression of impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Study. This study was conducted to evaluate metformin in the prevention or delaying of the progression of type 2 diabetes in high-risk patients . Patients who had impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance test, were overweight and had a sedentary lifestyle were randomized to receive metformin 850mg twice daily (n = 1,073), lifestyle-modification (goal of 7% weight loss and 150 minutes of physical activity per week) program (n = 1,079), or placebo (n = 1,082) with a mean followup of 2.8 years. There was a 58% reduction in incidence of diabetes in the lifestyle-intervention group and 31% reduction in the metformin group. Patients in the metformin group had a greater weight loss of 2.1kg compared to placebo but less compared with the lifestyle-intervention group of 5.6kg.
Monotherapy with metformin reduced the HbA1c up to 1.5% . DeFronzo et al. conducted a two-parallel-group, double-blind study to determine the efficacy of metformin in moderately obese patients with diabetes uncontrolled with diet or diet plus glyburide. In the first protocol (n = 289), patients (mean HbA1c ~8.3) were randomized to metformin (n = 143) or placebo (n = 146) after an eight-week hypocaloric dietary phase. The addition of metformin resulted in the reduction of HbA1c by 1.4% versus 0.4% in the placebo group at 29 weeks. The metformin group experienced weight loss of 0.6kg whereas the placebo group had a weight reduction of 1.1kg (P = NS). In the second protocol (n = 632), the patients (mean HbA1c ~8.7%) were started or continued on glyburide for five weeks. They were then randomized to glyburide (n = 209), metformin (n = 210), and metformin-glyburide (n = 213). Patients given metformin-glyburide achieved a greater reduction in HbA1c of 1.7% compared with 0.4% with metformin alone. There was a weight loss of 3.8kg in the metformin group compared with a weight gain of 0.4kg in the metformin-glyburide group.
In a double-blind, open-label study, metformin-glibenclamide combination was compared with metformin-rosiglitazone in 318 type 2 diabetes patients uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy (mean HbA1c ~8.5%) . Patients randomized to metformin-glibenclamide (n = 160) had a greater reduction in Hba1c of 1.5% compared with metformin-rosiglitazone (n=158) with a reduction in Hba1c of 1.1% at 24 weeks. There was a greater weight gain with the metformin-glibenclamide group compared with the metformin-rosiglitazone group (+3.0kg versus +1.4kg). There is a general consensus that metformin is the treatment of choice in obese type 2 diabetes patients as it has been shown to be either weight neutral or even result in modest weight loss. However, combination with SUs or TZDs may result in weight gain whereas the combination with GLP-1 analogs may enhance weight loss.
Pramlintide is an injectable synthetic analog of amylin which is a naturally occurring neuroendocrine hormone co-secreted with insulin by pancreatic beta cells in response to food intake. Pramlintide slows gastric emptying , attenuates postprandial glucagon secretion , enhances satiety, and reduces food intake . In a 52-week, double-blind, multicenter trial, 656 patients (mean HbA1c ~9.1%) were randomized to subcutaneous injections of either placebo or pramlintide (60μg TID, 90μg BID, or 120μg BID) in addition to their existing insulin regimen (alone or in combination with sulfonylureas and/or metformin) . Treatment with pramlintide 120μg BID produced a significant reduction in HbA1c of 0.68% at week 26 which was sustained at week 52. This effect was accompanied by a mean weight loss of 1.4kg compared with a weight gain of 0.7kg in the placebo group (P < .05). The addition of mealtime pramlintide 120μg (n = 57) was compared with rapid-acting insulin analogs (n = 56) in addition to basal insulin in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (n = 113; mean HbA1c ~ 8.2%) in a 24-week, randomized, open-label parallel-group, multicenter study . Mealtime pramlintide and rapid-acting insulin analog (RAIA) resulted in a reduction of Hba1c of 1.1% versus 1.3% (P = .46), respectively. Pramlintide was weight neutral whereas RAIA use was associated with a weight gain of 4.7±0.7kg.
The efficacy of pramlintide was evaluated in obese, nondiabetic subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study . Four hundred and eleven obese subjects (BMI ~37.5) were randomized to receive pramlintide (120, 240, and 360μg BID and TID) or placebo. Pramlintide at doses of 120μg TID and 360μg BID achieved weight loss of 3.2 ± 1.2 and 3.3 ± 1.1kg, respectively, at 4 months. After completion of the 4-month study, 260 subjects continued to participate in the single-blind extension for 8 months. There was a progressive reduction in weight of 6.1 ± 2.1 and 7.2 ± 2.3kg, respectively, at 12 months. In addition, 40 and 43% of patients treated with pramlintide 120μg BID and 360μg TID compared with 12% of patients in the placebo group achieved a reduction of >10% of baseline weight. These data are encouraging in that weight control is possible with the use of amylin analogs in patients inadequately controlled on insulin therapy.
GLP-1 analogs (exenatide and ligraglutide) are the latest medications used to treat diabetes and have favorable effects on both glycemic and weight control. In diabetes and obesity, the GLP-1 response to an oral glucose load is blunted contributing toward impaired insulin secretion and prandial hyperglycemia . GLP-1 enhances insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner, accounting for about 50–70% of the insulin secreted in response to oral glucose , and suppresses glucagon secretion . Weight loss from GLP-1 analogs results from the effects of hormone to promote satiety and slow gastric emptying [36, 37]. Further, animal studies have shown beneficial effect of GLP-1 hormone on beta cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis . These effects are of particular significance given that beta-cell failure occurs prior to the onset of diabetes.
Exenatide has a 53% homology to human GLP-1. It is available subcutaneously and due to a short half-life of 2–4 hours, it is administered twice daily and at least 60 minutes before meals. In a 30-week triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 336 patients inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin (mean HbA1c ~8.2%) were randomized to receive 5μg exenatide or placebo twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 5 or 10μg exenatide or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks . Exenatide 5μg and 10μg resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1c (−0.40% and −0.78%, resp.) compared with placebo (+0.085%). Moreover, there was a dose-dependent reduction in body weight. Patients on exenatide 10μg had a weight loss of 2.8kg compared with 1.6kg on exenatide 5μg. In an uncontrolled open-label extension of the prior 30-week study, 150 patients opted to continue exenatide treatment for another 52 weeks for a total of 82 weeks . Exenatide was associated with a reduction in HbA1c of 1.0 ± 0.1% and with weight loss of 3.0 ± 0.6kg at 30 weeks, effects were sustained at the end of 82 weeks with a final HbA1c reduction of 1.3 ± 0.1% and weight loss of 5.3 ± 0.8kg.
The long-term efficacy of exenatide was assessed in an open-ended, open-label clinical trial in which patients from three placebo-controlled trials and their open-label extensions were enrolled for 3 years. A total of 217 patients completed the study . The reduction in HbA1c from baseline to week 12 (−1.1 ± 0.1%) was sustained up to 3 years (−1.0 ± 0.1%). There was progressive reduction in body weight from baseline (−5.3 ± 0.4kg at 3 years from −1.6 ± 0.2kg at week 12). In addition to weight reduction, there was also a reduction in total body fat mass and truncal fat mass compared to the use of glargine . The use of exenatide (10μg BID with a 4-week 5μg dose initiation) in addition to decreased calorie intake in nondiabetic obese subjects (n = 152) resulted in weight loss of 5.1 ± 0.5kg from baseline versus 1.6 ± 0.5kg with placebo at the end of a 24-week randomized study .
Liraglutide is more recently approved by FDA (January 2010) to be used as a once-daily subcutaneous injection for type 2 diabetes. In contrast to exenatide, liraglutide has a 97% homology to native human GLP-1 and has a longer half-life of 13 hours due to the presence of a fatty moiety allowing it to bind to albumin rendering it resistant to degradation by the DPP-4 enzyme . Garber et al. conducted a 52-week double-blind, double-dummy, active-control, parallel-group study wherein 746 patients with early type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c 8.2%) were randomized to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2mg or 1.8mg) or oral glimepiride 8mg . Liraglutides 1.2mg and 1.8mg were associated with a reduction in HbA1c of 0.84% and 1.14%, respectively, compared with 0.51% with glimepiride. There was a dose-dependent reduction in body weight with 1.2 and 1.8mg liraglutides (−1.85kg and −2.26kg, resp.).
The addition of liraglutide with metformin and TZDs was studied in a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects (n = 533) were randomized to once-daily liraglutide (1.2mg or 1.8mg) or placebo in addition to metformin (1g BID) and rosiglitazone (4mg BID) . The addition of liraglutide resulted in a mean reduction of HbA1c of 1.5% for both the 1.2 and 1.8mg liraglutide doses with a dose-dependent weight loss of 1-2kg. In a 26-week, multinational, parallel-group trial, liraglutide was compared to glargine in addition to metformin and sulfonylurea . Five-hundred-eighty-one patients were randomized (2:1:2) to liraglutide 1.8mg (n=232), placebo (n=115), and open-label insulin glargine (n = 234) in addition to metformin (1g BID) and glimepiride (4mg once daily). There was a greater reduction in HbA1c with liraglutide compared with insulin glargine (−1.33% versus −1.09%). Liraglutide 1.8mg resulted in a mean weight loss of 1.8kg from baseline compared with 0.42kg in the placebo group. Patients on insulin glargine gained 1.6kg. In addition, waist circumference decreased significantly in the liraglutide group (−1.50cm) whereas patients on insulin glargine had an increase in waist circumference (+0.89cm).
Buse et al. compared the efficacy of liraglutide 1.8mg once daily with exenatide 10μg twice daily in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group multinational study . Patients (n = 464) randomized to liraglutide (n = 233) had a greater reduction in HbA1c than to exenatide (−1.12% versus −0.79%, resp.) and more patients achieved HbA1c value of <7% with the liraglutide group (54% versus 43%). Both groups achieved weight loss (−3.24kg versus −2.87kg; P = NS). The efficacy of liraglutide (1.2mg, 1.8mg, 2.4mg, or 3.0mg) was assessed in obese nondiabetic individuals in a 20-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label orlistat comparator . Individuals in the liraglutide group significantly lost more weight compared to placebo at all doses (P < .003) and orlistat group (P = .003 for liraglutide 2.4mg and P < .001 for liraglutide 3mg). Mean weight loss with liraglutide at different doses ranged from an average of 4.8–7.2kg compared with 2.8kg with placebo and 4.1kg with orlistat. About 76% of individuals (n = 70) on liraglutide 3.0mg lost >5% of their weight compared with 30% (n = 29) with placebo or 44% (n = 42) with orlistat. Liraglutide decreased the prevalence of prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance) by 84–96% with 1.8 to 3mg per day.
Sitagliptin, saxagliptin, and vildagliptin are DPP-4 inhibitors that inhibit the degradation of endogenous GLP-1. These are available as oral agents. Sitagliptin and saxagliptin are FDA approved for monotherapy and use with metformin for type 2 diabetes. Vildagliptin is approved for use in Europe. Aschner et al. evaluated the efficacy of sitagliptin as monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study . A total of 741 patients with baseline HbA1c 8.0% were randomized to sitagliptin 100mg or 200mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks. Sitagliptin at doses of 100 or 200mg had a significant reduction in HbA1c of 0.69 and 0.94%, respectively, with no significant change in body weight.
In another double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in which 1091 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c 8.8%) were randomized to sitaglipin 100mg/metformin 1000mg (S100/M1000 group), sitagliptin 100mg/metformin 2000mg (S100/M2000 group), metformin 1000mg (M1000 group), metformin 2000mg (M2000 group), sitagliptin 100mg (S100 group), or placebo . All treatment groups achieved a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline compared with placebo and respective monotherapies at 24 weeks (P < .001). Patients in the S100/M2000 group had a reduction in Hba1c of 2.07%, S100/M1000 group with a reduction of 1.57%, M2000 group with a reduction of 1.30%, M1000 group with a reduction of 0.99%, and S100 group with reduction of 0.83%. There were significant reductions in body weight from baseline (−0.6 to 1.3kg) in all groups, except in the sitagliptin group with no change in weight. Thus, as opposed to using SUs with metformin that may promote weight gain and run the risk of hypoglycemia, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors with metformin would be expected to result in less weight gain without the risk of hypoglycemia.
Similar to the effects of sitagliptin, saxagliptin at doses of 2.4, 5, and 10mg, in addition to metformin, also similarly produced a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (−0.59 to 0.69%) with no significant change in weight .
At present, there are only two antiobesity agents approved for long-term use by the FDA. These agents may be used with lifestyle modification and metformin. Orlistat and sibutramine have been studied in type 2 diabetes populations which will be briefly reviewed here.
Orlistat is a lipase inhibitor that inhibits the absorption of dietary fat in the gastrointestinal tract by approximately 30% at dosage of 120mg three times daily in combination with a mildly hypocaloric diet . Xenical in the Prevention of Diabetes in Obese Subjects (XENDOS) Study, a 4-year double-blind, prospective study, was conducted to determine the long-term effect of orlistat in reducing progression to type 2 diabetes . Obese patients (n = 3,305; BMI ~37kg/m2) with normal (79%) or impaired (21%) glucose tolerance were randomized to lifestyle changes plus either orlistat 120mg or placebo, three times daily. Patients treated with orlistat achieved significantly greater weight loss (5.8kg) compared to placebo (3.0kg). More patients in the orlistat group achieved a weight loss of ≥10% compared to the placebo group (26% versus 15.6%). There was also a greater reduction in incidence of type 2 diabetes with the orlistat group versus the control group of 6.2% versus 9.0% corresponding to a risk reduction of 37.3%.
Several studies were also conducted to determine the effect of orlistat in patients with type 2 DM. Jacob et al. conducted a multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c ~8.5%; BMI ~37kg/m2) on either metformin, sulfonylurea, and/or insulin were randomized to treatment with orlistat 120mg three times daily (n = 1279) or placebo (n = 1271) . Patients treated with orlistat had a statistically significant greater decrease in body weight (−3.8kg) than placebo-treated patients (−1.4kg) and a larger decrease in HbA1c compared with placebo (−0.74% versus −0.31%). In addition, patients with minimal weight loss (<1% of baseline body weight) were also found to have a significant improvement in glycemic control with orlistat (HbA1c −0.29%) compared with placebo (± 0.14%) suggesting that improvement of glycemic control associated with orlistat may be independent of weight loss. The greater reduction in weight loss and improvement in glycemic control with orlistat has also been shown consistently in combination with metformin and sulfonylureas [56, 57] or insulin  in individual studies. In a 52-week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study in which type 2 diabetes patients (n = 220) treated with metformin alone or in combination with sulfonylurea were randomized to orlistat versus placebo . Orlistat-treated patients achieved greater reduction in weight (5%) versus placebo (1.8%) as well as greater reduction in HbA1c (−1.1% versus −0.2%). These were also accompanied by greater improvements in beta cell function and insulin resistance. Thus, treatment with orlistat may counteract the weight gain effects associated with SUs and insulin and is currently available over the counter.
Sibutramine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. It acts by decreasing food intake by reducing appetite and increasing satiety . In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 348 obese patients (BMI~35kg/m2) were randomized to sibutramine 15mg daily or placebo . The sibutramine-treated group had greater weight loss compared to placebo (8.1kg versus 5.1kg). More patients on the sibutramine group lost more than 5% (62% versus 41%) and 10% (40% versus 19%) of their baseline weight compared to placebo. Aronne et al. conducted a study to evaluate the effects of coadministration of pramlintide with sibutramine or phentermine in a 25-week multicenter trial . Overweight or obese, nondiabetic subjects (n = 244) were randomized to pramlintide (120μg TID), pramlintide (120μg TID) + oral sibutramine (10mg once daily), or pramlintide (120μg TID) + phentermine (37.5mg once daily). Subjects who received combination treatment achieved greater weight loss (−11.3kg) compared with pramlintide alone (−3.6kg) or placebo (−2.1kg).
McNulty et al. conducted a 12-month, prospective, double-blind study in which 195 subjects with type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c ~ 9.5%; BMI ~ 36kg/m2) treated with metformin were randomized to sibutramine 15 or 20mg daily or placebo . There was significant weight loss in the sibutramine group with both 15mg (−5.5 ± 0.6kg) and 20mg (−8.0 ± 0.9kg) doses compared to placebo (−0.2 ± 0.5kg) with no significant change in HbA1c. However, in subjects who lost more than 10% of their body weight, there was a significant decrease in HbA1c averaging 1.2%. Gokcel et al. evaluated the efficacy of sibutramine in combination with oral hypoglycemic agents in obese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c ~9.9%; BMI ~38kg/m2) . Sixty patients were randomized to sibutramine 10mg twice daily or placebo. Sibutramine induced a greater mean reduction in weight than placebo (−9.61kg versus −0.91kg). HbA1c reduced significantly at 6 months by 2.73% in the sibutramine group compared with 0.53% in the placebo group. A recent randomized control trial of sibutramine compared with placebo on cardiovascular effects in obese patients has shown an increase in risk for myocardial infarction, however this increase wasn't noted in patients with diabetes . Careful consideration for risk versus benefit is needed for the use of sibutramine for weight loss in diabetes.
In recent years, an increasing number of antidiabetes agents, which have varying effects on glycemic control and weight, have become available. The treatment of diabetes should not only focus on glycemic control as its sole intention, but it should factor in the effect of these various agents on weight as well, since obesity aggravates insulin resistance, beta cell failure, and cardiovascular risk. SUs, TZDs, and insulin, when used alone or in combination, are usually associated with modest weight gain, whereas metformin and amylin analogues are weight neutral or result in weight loss. DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral whereas GLP-1 analogues are associated with weight loss. Therefore, in contrast to the conventional glycemic control strategy that results in significant weight gain, we propose that aggressive weight loss with lifestyle modification and metformin remain the foremost strategy followed by the use of incretin analogs. If glycemic control remains inadequate, the addition of low-dose TZDs would be a reasonable approach followed by the addition of basal insulin as necessary. Alternatively, the use of antiobesity agents such as orlistat, phentermine, or sibutramine has been shown to prevent or delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in obese patients and minimize the weight gain associated with SUs and insulin. These strategies should help balance glycemic and weight control in patients with obesity and diabetes.
The authors are grateful to Dr. Charles Faiman for his thoughtful comments and editorial assistance with this paper.