PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of casrepmedCase Reports in Medicine
 
Case Rep Med. 2010; 2010: 765389.
Published online 2010 September 19. doi:  10.1155/2010/765389
PMCID: PMC2945678

Conservative Management of Segmental Infarction of the Greater Omentum: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Abstract

Segmental omental infarction (SOI) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain. Depending on the site of infarction, it mimics conditions like appendicitis, cholecystitis, and diverticulitis. Before the widespread use of Computed Tomography (CT), the diagnosis was usually made intraoperatively. SOI produces characteristic radiological appearances on CT scan; hence, correct diagnosis using this form of imaging may prevent unnecessary surgery. We present the case of a young woman who was treated conservatively after accurate radiological diagnosis.

1. Introduction

Segmental infarction of the greater omentum was described over 100 years ago [1]; however, the aetiology is still unknown [2, 3]. Most patients present with right-sided abdominal pain (90%), and males are more frequently affected (ratio 2 : 1) [3, 4]. It has been postulated that the right side of the omentum is more susceptible to infarction due to its greater length and mobility [5]. Other authors have attributed its occurrence to a different embryonic origin of the right side of the omentum with congenitally anomalous fragile blood vessels [6, 7]. This condition occurs mainly in people in their fourth and fifth decades [8], and a significant proportion of cases have also been described in the paediatric population (15%) [9].

2. Case Presentation

A 20-year-old woman without significant previous medical history presented with a one-week history of acute right-upper quadrant (RUQ) pain and no other gastrointestinal symptoms. Examination revealed focal tenderness in the RUQ with mild peritonism. Murphy's sign was negative. She was apyrexial; pregnancy test was negative; routine blood investigations revealed a raised white cell count of 13.6 × 103/ml and a C-reactive protein (CRP) of 88 mg/dl. Other blood tests and erect chest radiograph were unremarkable. Microscopic haematuria was also noted on urinalysis. An unenhanced CT scan was subsequently performed and demonstrated a focal region of heterogenous increased fat density involving the right omentum between the hepatic flexure and anterior abdominal wall (Figure 1). No other abnormalities were found, and based on these CT findings, a diagnosis of SOI was made. The patient was closely observed and managed conservatively with analgesia. Her abdominal pain gradually resolved, and she was discharged three days after hospitalisation.

Figure 1
Unenhanced CT images (a) coronal, (b) axial, (c) sagittal show a focal area of hyperattenuating omental fat stranding (arrows).

3. Discussion

The incidence of SOI is estimated to be around 0.1% of all laparotomies performed for acute abdomen [4]. Various predisposing factors have been implicated including obesity, trauma, recent abdominal surgery, postprandial vascular congestion, sudden increase in intraabdominal pressure, and hypercoagulability [8, 1012]. Table 1 shows the classification of segmental infarction of the greater omentum.

Table 1
Classification of omental infarction [2, 8, 13].

Clinical findings for SOI tend to be nonspecific. Patients are constitutionally well and present with acute or subacute abdominal pain; gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhoea are uncommon [5, 12]. Temperature is usually normal or slightly raised; there is localised tenderness with varying degree of guarding on the right side of the abdomen [13]. The white blood cell count and CRP may be elevated [8]. Therefore, omental infarction is difficult to be distinguished clinically from common surgical ailments such as appendicitis and cholecystitis.

Correct radiological diagnosis is important to establish the most appropriate treatment plan for the patient. Ultrasound scan (USS) or computed tomography can be used to make a reliable diagnosis. Typical CT findings of omental infarction include a well-circumscribed ovoid area of heterogenous fat stranding with hyperattenuating streaks located within the omentum between the rectus abdominis and colon [8, 11]. Typical features found on ultrasound scan include a moderately hyperechoic noncompressible lesion at the site of maximal tenderness [5]. In the past, diagnosis of SOI was rarely made preoperatively. The routine use of CT and USS in the assessment of acute abdominal pain coupled with improved awareness of this condition may account for the increasing number of cases being identified [11, 14].

Omental infarction can either be managed conservatively or surgically, and there are controversies about the correct treatment modality. Some authors recommend surgical intervention because it leads to a shorter hospitalisation period and a more rapid improvement of the patients' pain [1519]. Also, there is less risk of rare complications including abscess formation, adhesions, and sepsis [11, 20, 21].

Others argue that unnecessary operations should be avoided because this disease usually runs a self-limited course [3, 18, 2123]. Using PubMed, a review of the English literature regarding conservative management of SOI was performed for the period from 1990 to 2010. Twenty-one relevant articles with a total of 64 patients were identified. All patients underwent USS and/or CT to confirm the diagnosis of SOI. The patient details for these studies are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2
Summary of patient demographics.

Fifty-four patients underwent successful conservative management with no ensuing complications. However, 10 patients (15.6%) had subsequent laparoscopic resection of the infarcted omentum having failed conservative management. The reasons for failed initial conservative treatment were severe intractable pain and worsening of symptoms. The postoperative recovery of these patients was uneventful. The results from the above table demonstrate that non-operative treatment of omental infarction has been achieved in several series with successful outcomes provided that an accurate radiological diagnosis is obtained and the patient's condition remains stable. Moreover, with conservative management, most patients become symptom-free within two weeks [2, 5, 31].

Surgical exploration of the abdomen is mandatory in patients with unclear radiological findings or if the patient's clinical condition deteriorates [3]. If surgical intervention is required, then laparoscopic exploration should be considered as it can be both diagnostic and therapeutic and are associated with low morbidity [10, 20, 37, 38]. Of note, up to half of cases of omental infarction is associated with free serosanguineous peritoneal fluid [7, 9, 13]. The presence of this fluid and normal intraabdominal viscera should encourage further exploration and closer inspection of the omentum during laparoscopy [39].

4. Conclusion

Segmental omental infarction is a benign rare cause of acute abdomen, and hence it is seldom considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. It mimicks symptoms that often leads to misdiagnosis of appendicitis, cholecystitis, or diverticulitis [14]. The use of cross-sectional imaging allows us to obtain typical, well-recognisable, and reliable imaging features to diagnose this entity and hence avoid unnecessary surgery. Moreover, complications of conservative management tend to be rare. The main disadvantages of conservative management are longer hospitalization and the increased use of analgesics [22]. The standard treatment modality for omental infarction has not been fully established to date; however, most cases diagnosed radiologically have been followedup by surgical intervention [2]. We believe a conservative treatment approach is justified in the majority of patients affected by SOI after thorough imaging evaluation and the exclusion of other significant intraabdominal pathologies.

Conflicts of Interests

Author declare no conflict of interests.

References

1. Bush P. A case of haemorrhage into the greater omentum. The Lancet. 1896;147(3779):p. 286.
2. Stella DL, Schelleman TG. Segmental infarction of the omenturn secondary to torsion: ultrasound and computed tomography diagnosis. Australasian Radiology. 2000;44(2):212–215. [PubMed]
3. Paroz A, Halkic N, Pezzetta E, Martinet O. Idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum: a rare cause of acute abdomen. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2003;7(6):805–808. [PubMed]
4. Lardies JM, Abente FC, Napolitano A, Sarotto L, Ferraina P. Primary segmental infarction of the greater omentum: a rare cause of RLQ syndrome: laparoscopic resection. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2001;11(1):60–62. [PubMed]
5. Puylaert JBCM. Right-sided segmental infarction of the omentum: clinical, US, and CT findings. Radiology. 1992;185(1):169–172. [PubMed]
6. Epstein LI, Lempke RE. Primary idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum: case report and collective review of the literature. Annals of Surgery. 1968;167(3):437–443. [PubMed]
7. Tolenaar PL, Bast TJ. Idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum. British Journal of Surgery. 1987;74(12):p. 1182. [PubMed]
8. Cianci R, Filippone A, Basilico R, Storto ML. Idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum diagnosed by unenhanced multidetector-row CT and treated successfully by laparoscopy. Emergency Radiology. 2008;15(1):51–56. [PubMed]
9. Crofoot DD. Spontaneous segmental infarction of the greater omentum. American Journal of Surgery. 1980;139(2):262–264. [PubMed]
10. Ho CL, Devriendt H. Idiopathic segmental infarction of right sided greater omentum. Case report and review of the literature. Acta Chirurgica Belgica. 2004;104(4):459–461. [PubMed]
11. Rao A, Remer EM, Phelan M, Hatem SF. Segmental omental infarction. Emergency Radiology. 2007;14(3):195–197. [PubMed]
12. Sakellaris G, Stathopoulos E, Kafousi M, Arbiros J, Bitsori M, Charissis G. Primary idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum: two cases of acute abdomen in childhood. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2004;39(8):1264–1266. [PubMed]
13. Battaglia L, Belli F, Vannelli A, et al. Simultaneous idiopathic segmental infarction of the great omentum and acute appendicitis: a rare association. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2008;3(1, article 30) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JBCM. Epiploic appendagitis and omental infarction: pitfalls and look-alikes. Abdominal Imaging. 2002;27(1):20–28. [PubMed]
15. Varjavandi V, Lessin M, Kooros K, Fusunyan R, McCauley R, Gilchrist B. Omental infarction: risk factors in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2003;38(2):233–235. [PubMed]
16. Kerem M, Bedirli A, Mentes BB, Sakrak O, Pala I, Oguz M. Torsion of the greater omentum: preoperative computed tomographic diagnosis and therapeutic laparoscopy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2005;9(4):494–496. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Sánchez J, Rosado R, Ramírez D, Medina P, Mezquita S, Gallardo A. Torsion of the greater omentum: treatment by laparoscopy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2002;12(6):443–445. [PubMed]
18. Bachar GN, Shafir G, Postnikov V, Belenky A, Benjaminov O. Sonographic diagnosis of right segmental omental infarction. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2005;33(2):76–79. [PubMed]
19. Itenberg E, Mariadason J, Khersonsky J, Wallack M. Modern management of omental torsion and omental infarction: a surgeon’s perspective. Journal of surgical education. 2010;67(1):44–47. [PubMed]
20. Goti F, Hollmann R, Stieger R, Lange J. Idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum successfully treated by laparoscopy: report of case. Surgery Today. 2000;30(5):451–453. [PubMed]
21. Goh BK, Koong H-N. Non-operative management of idiopathic segmental infarction of the greater omentum successfully diagnosed by computed tomography. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2006;21(10):1638–1639. [PubMed]
22. Nubi A, McBride W, Stringel G. Primary omental infarct: conservative vs operative management in the era of ultrasound, computerized tomography, and laparoscopy. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009;44(5):953–956. [PubMed]
23. Park TU, Oh JH, Chang IT, et al. Omental infarction: case series and review of the literature. Journal of Emergency Medicine. In press. [PubMed]
24. Pilleul F, Bonifacio A, Atri M. CT appearance of primary omental torsion: description of a new finding. The Journal of Radiology. 2003
25. Fragoso AC, Pereira JM, Estevão-Costa J. Nonoperative management of omental infarction: a case report in a child. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2006;41(10):1777–1779. [PubMed]
26. Coulier B. Segmental omental infarction in childhood: a typical case diagnosed by CT allowing successful conservative treatment. Pediatric Radiology. 2006;36(2):141–143. [PubMed]
27. Abadir JS, Cohen AJ, Wilson SE. Accurate diagnosis of infarction of omentum and appendices epiploicae by computed tomography. American Surgeon. 2004;70(10):854–857. [PubMed]
28. Coulier B, Van Hoof M. Intraperitoneal fat focal infarction of the lesser omentum: case report. Abdominal Imaging. 2004;29(4):498–501. [PubMed]
29. Xavier S, John P. Torsion of the greater omentum with inguinal hernia. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;22(5):194–196. [PubMed]
30. Mcclure MJ, Khalili K, Sarrazin J, Hanbidge A. Radiological features of epiploic appendagitis and segmental omental infarction. Clinical Radiology. 2001;56(10):819–827. [PubMed]
31. Van Breda Vriesman AC, Lohle PNM, Coerkamp EG, Puylaert JBCM. Infarction of omentum and epiploic appendage: diagnosis, epidemiology and natural history. European Radiology. 1999;9(9):1886–1892. [PubMed]
32. Karak PK, Millmond SH, Neumann D, Yamase HT, Ramsby G. Omental infarction: report of three cases and review of the literature. Abdominal Imaging. 1998;23(1):96–98. [PubMed]
33. Puylaert JBCM. Right-sided segmental infarction of the omentum: clinical, US, and CT findings. Radiology. 1992;185(1):169–172. [PubMed]
34. Singh AK, Alhilali LM, Gervais DA, Mueller PR. Omental infarct: an unusual CT appearance after superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Emergency Radiology. 2004;10(5):276–278. [PubMed]
35. Myers MT, Grisoni ER, Sivit CJ. Segmental omental infarction in a 9-year-old girl. Emergency Radiology. 1997;4(2):112–114.
36. Garant M, Taourel P, Fried GM, Bret PM. Thickening of the transverse colon associated with torsion of the greater omentum. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1995;165(5):p. 1309. [PubMed]
37. Steyaert H, Valla J-S. Laparoscopic approach to primary infarction of the greater omentum. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy. 1997;7(2):97–98. [PubMed]
38. Kavalakat AJ, Varghese CJ. Laparoscopic management of an uncommon cause of right lower quadrant pain: a case report. Cases Journal. 2008;1, article 164 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Sasmal PK, Tantia O, Patle N, Khanna S. Omental torsion and infarction: a diagnostic dilemma and its laparoscopic management. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A. 2010;20(3):225–229. [PubMed]

Articles from Case Reports in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Limited