LytM was originally identified and proposed to be responsible for the residual autolytic activity in an autolysis-defective
lyt− mutant strain of
S. aureus (
Ramadurai & Jayaswal, 1997). It has subsequently been shown that the expression of
lytM is negatively regulated by RAT, a regulator of autolysis of the
S. aureus cells (
Ingavale et al., 2003). In proteomic and transcriptomic analysis, the level of LytM has been shown to be elevated 2–3 fold in derivative
S. aureus strains with increased vancomycin resistance compared to its level in the parent
S. aureus strain with lower level of vancomycin resistance (
Mongodin et al., 2003;
Pieper et al., 2006). It has also been shown by electrophoretic mobility shift and DNase protection assays that the expression of
lytM in
S. aureus is regulated by the essential two-component regulatory system WalK/WalR (YycG/YycF) (
Dubrac & Msadek, 2004;
Dubrac et al., 2007). The response regulator WalR activates the expression of nine genes involved in staphylococcal cell wall degradation. Conditions that depleted WalR in
S. aureus cells led to significant reduction in the levels of cell wall hydrolytic enzymes including a 36 kDa hydrolytic enzyme that was speculated by the authors to be LytM (
Dubrac et al., 2007).
The results of this study, however, suggest that LytM which is an early to mid exponential phase protein is not responsible for the 36 kDa lytic activity band present in the
lyt− mutant strain of
S. aureus. This conclusion is based on the fact that there was no decrease in the intensity of 36 kDa lytic band subsequent to the deletion of
lytM gene from
S. aureus cells. In addition, the lytic activity present in the
lyt− mutant strain of
S. aureus could not be abolished after the deletion of
lytM gene in this autolysis resistant strain. Our findings are further supported by the observations with LytM protein and its lytic activity during the course of its crystal structure determination (
Odintsov et al., 2004). The authors demonstrated LytM to be a Zn
++-dependent two domain metalloprotease (
Odintsov et al., 2004). The N-terminal domain of LytM (45–98) makes very limited contact with the LytM C-domain (
Odintsov et al., 2004). The LytM C-domain (99–316) comprises two ordered regions located up- and down-stream of a disordered (147–182) region. The authors detected no lytic activity in assays using pentaglycine as substrate with the full length LytM or a truncated LytM that lacked the N-terminal and the upstream ordered region (
Odintsov et al., 2004). However, truncated LytM (185–316) or a trypsin product of LytM (180–316) that only contained the downstream ordered region demonstrated activity in these assays (
Odintsov et al., 2004). The crystal structure of this active fragment of LytM
185–316 has since been determined (
Firczuk et al., 2005).
The abundance of LytM in the form of a 36 kDa protein in vancomycin resistant
S. aureus (
Pieper et al., 2006) suggests some role for this protein in resistance against vancomycin and probably other cell wall inhibitors. This speculation is supported by observation in this study where the lack of a functional LytM led to induced lysis of staphylococcal cells in the presence of oxacillin. However, the expression of
lytM was not impacted by exposure to cell wall inhibitors either in this study or in a prior study (
Utaida et al., 2003).
Several
S. aureus mutants are described in the literature with dramatically reduced rates of autolysis. Similar to
lyt− mutant, a mutation in the
atl gene in
S. aureus abolished most of the lytic bands except for a 36 kDa autolysin band and few minor bands of smaller sizes (
Foster, 1995). It is still to be ascertained what gene or genes have been inactivated in
lyt− S. aureus strain subsequent to transposon insertion that led to reduced autolysis of the mutant cells. On the other hand, the
atl gene is well characterized, encodes a 137 kDa protein, and it has been proposed that most autolysins in
S. aureus are the processed products of ATL protein (
Foster, 1995;
Sugai et al., 1997). In another study, suppression of the expression of a putative
S. aureus glycoprotease led to dramatically reduced autolysis of
S. aureus cells. However, there was no change in the expression levels of any of the known autolysin regulators or autolysins including LytM in these autolysis-resistant cells with reduced level of the glycoprotease (
Zheng et al., 2007). Expression level of
lytM and and other major autolytic enzymes was also not suppressed in transcriptomic analysis of an autolysis-deficient methicillin-resistant strain of
S. aureus (
Renzoni et al., 2006).
In summary, the findings of this study suggest that LytM is an insignificant player in terms of autolysins in
S. aureus and is not responsible for the 36 kDa lytic protein many investigators have proposed to be due to this protein. There are several genes like
lytN and
aaa (
Gill et al., 2005;
Heilmann et al., 2005) that are postulated to be peptidoglycan hydrolases and encode proteins of approximately 36 kDa that might be responsible for the pronounced lytic activity band of this size that is typically visualized in zymographic analysis of staphylococcal autolysins. Based on the findings of this study, it is thus proposed that the LytM protein be investigated in
S. aureus beyond its role as an autolysin.