|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Thymocyte selection-associated HMG box factor (TOX) is a DNA-binding factor required for development of CD4 T cells, natural killer T cells, and T regulatory cells. Here we document that both NK cell development and lymphoid tissue organogenesis are inhibited in the absence of TOX. We find that development of lymphoid tissue inducer cells, a rare subset of specialized cells that plays an integral role in lymphoid tissue organogenesis, requires TOX. Tox is highly upregulated in immature NK cells in the bone marrow, consistent with the loss of mature NK cells in the absence of this nuclear protein. Thus, multiple cell lineages in the immune system share a TOX-dependent step for development.
The immune system is comprised of primary lymphoid organs, including thymus and bone marrow, which support the complex developmental programs necessary for differentiation of precursor cells into distinct immune mediators, and secondary lymphoid organs, including spleen, lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, which focus antigens and promote cellular interactions needed for the initiation of the adaptive immune response as well as the subsequent generation of effector functions.
The development of lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, the latter consisting of lymph node-like structures localized on the small intestine, occurs during embryogenesis through a complex series of interactions between hematopoietic and stromal cells involving both soluble and membrane bound mediators1. Cell-bound lymphotoxin (LT) α1β2 interacting with LTβ receptor is important for this process2, such that ablation of lymphotoxin α (LTα) results in complete lack of lymph nodes, Peyer’s patches as well as disorganized B and T cell areas in the spleen3. In addition, mice deficient in the chemokine CXCL13 or its receptor CXCR5 exhibit a defect in Peyer’s patches and have compromised lymph node formation4. Absence of interleukin 7 (IL-7) signaling through deletion of IL-7 receptor (IL-7R, CD127) also inhibits secondary lymphoid tissue organogenesis, although to variable levels5-7.
Key to the development of lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches is a distinct subset of cells called lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells, which have been identified in both mice and humans8, 9. LTi cells are hematopoietic non-T cells (and thus express CD45 but lack T cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements or expression of CD3) that nonetheless express cell surface CD4 in mice, while CD4 expression is heterogeneous in humans8-10. LTi cells also express CD127, CXCR5, and LTα, consistent with the disruption of lymphoid tissue development in gene knockouts encoding these molecules8, 11, 12.
During fetal development, LTi cells concentrate as clusters in the lymph node anlagen8, 10, 13. Transfer of fetal CD45+CD3−CD4+ cells into mice with severe defects in lymphoid tissue formation rescues these defects11, 12. IL-7 can promote de novo differentiation and proliferation of LTi cells from bone marrow in adult mice, indicating that some precursors are retained after birth14. Indeed, LTi-like cells can be found in several lymphoid tissues in the adult mouse, including the thymus, spleen and gut. Adult and fetal LTi cells share most cell surface markers14 as well as a similar transcriptome15, and adult LTi cells can promote development of VCAM1+ intestinal lymphoid tissue when transferred into CXCR5-deficient mice14, 15. However, whether adult LTi cells can support true lymph node organogenesis remains to be formally demonstrated. Adult LTi cells play other roles in the immune system, including production of inflammatory cytokines interleukin 17 (IL-17) and interleukin 22 (IL-22)16 regulation of the autoimmune regulator Aire expression by medullary thymic epithelial cells17, 18 and organization of B and T cells areas in secondary lymphoid organs18.
Differentiation of LTi cells is known to be dependent on several nuclear factors, such as Ikaros19, the E-protein inhibitor Id220, 21 and a splice variant of the Retinoid-Related Orphan Receptor γ (RORγ(t))10. Consequently, gene knockouts of these factors result in loss of LTi cells and the absence of peripheral lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches10, 20-22. Interestingly, gene knockouts of two of these transcriptional regulators also affect the differentiation of natural killer (NK) cells. Thus, mice deficient in Ikaros or Id2 lack NK cells19-21, as well as lymph nodes, suggesting the possibility of a common development pathway between these distinct cell types.
Development of NK cells has been shown to be dependent on the expression of interleukin 15 receptor (IL-15R)23 and a downstream IL-15-regulated transcription factor E4BP4 (NFIL3)24, 25. However, the block in NK cell development observed in IL-15R-deficient or E4BP4-deficient mice occurs at an earlier stage than that seen in Id2-deficient mice21, 24. Overexpression of E4BP4 resulted in increased expression of Id2 in hematopoietic progenitor cells, suggesting that expression of Id2 could be directly regulated by E4BP424. Indeed, reconstitution of E4BP4-deficient mice with ectopically expressed Id2 rescues the development of NK cells, indicating that in this context E4BP4 functions primarily as an Id2 inducer. Whether development of secondary lymphoid tissue is also inhibited in E4BP4-deficient mice was not addressed yet. Thus, whether Id2 is similarly regulated during LTi development remains unclear.
In the current study we demonstrate that an additional nuclear protein, TOX (thymocyte selection-associated HMG box factor), plays a dual role in development of the NK and LTi lineages. The Tox gene was initially identified based on its upregulation during thymocyte differentiation and is expressed during specific stages of T cell development in the thymus26. TOX-deficient mice have a severe block at a transitional stage of positive selection in the thymus, leading to loss of the CD4 T lymphocyte lineage27. As shown here, TOX is also expressed in LTi cells and at specific stages in the development of NK cells. Consistent with this, Tox−/− mice have few LTi cells leading to failure of lymph node organogenesis and a drastic reduction in the frequency and size of Peyer’s patches. In addition, we demonstrate a cell intrinsic defect in the ability of Tox−/− hematopoietic cells to differentiate into NK cells. These data add another common link between the LTi and NK cell lineages and reveal TOX as a key player in multiple aspects of immune system development.
Tox−/− mice have a defect in the development of CD4 T lineage cells27. In addition, all peripheral lymph nodes, including mesenteric lymph nodes, were absent in Tox−/− mice (Fig. 1a). This phenotype was independent of the role of TOX in T cell development, as lymph nodes structures were present in mice with a conditional T cell deletion of Tox, while the T cell defect phenotype was recapitulated (Supplementary Fig. 1 and J.K., unpublished observations).
Peyer’s patches could be identified in the small intestine of some, but not all, Tox−/− mice. However, even when present, Peyer’s patches were drastically reduced in both size and frequency (Fig. 1b,c). Histological analysis of the remaining Peyer’s patches in Tox−/− mice demonstrated the presence of lymphocytes in these structures (Fig. 1d) and their organization in distinct B and T cells areas (Fig. 1e). However, some reduction in the density of T cells was noted (Fig. 1e, low magnification), likely due to the T lymphopenia in animals that lack TOX27. These results suggested that while the development of Peyer’s patches was severely compromised in the absence of TOX, remaining structures could still be colonized by Tox−/− lymphocytes.
To address if the loss of secondary lymphoid organs was caused by the abnormal complement of lymphocytes in Tox−/− mice, we generated bone marrow chimeras. Lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches were present in all wild-type chimeric mice, whether reconstituted with Tox−/− (n=6) or Tox+/− (n=5) donor bone marrow cells. Moreover, like their Tox+/− counterparts, Tox−/− cells colonized both lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, arguing against a severe migration defect in cells that lack TOX (Fig. 2a,b). In addition, a T cell intrinsic block in thymic positive selection27 was evident in wild-type mice reconstituted with Tox−/− bone marrow, because reduced numbers of CD4 T cells were found in lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches in these chimeric mice (Fig. 2a,b). In contrast, Tox−/− mice reconstituted with wild-type bone marrow were still devoid of lymph nodes and we could not detect any Peyer’s patches in these mice (n=8, data not shown).
Lack of lymph node in Tox−/− mice could also be due to the inability of TOX-deficient cells to maintain lymph node primordia. For example, both aly/aly and Il2rγ−/−Rag2−/− mice have defects in lymph node formation, however, the former lack lymph nodes due to absence of lymphotoxin signaling during embryogenesis, while the latter exhibit a defect in the maintenance of the anlage due to the absence of mature lymphocytes required for crosstalk with these structures during the post-natal period28. Transfer of wild-type lymphocytes to neonates rescues lymph nodes in Il2rγ−/−Rag2−/− mice28, although the mechanism is unclear29. To address this possibility, total lymph node cells derived from wild-type mice were injected into Tox−/− mice within 24 h of birth. Donor wild-type T cells were detected in the spleen of Tox−/− host animals 4 weeks post-injection, and at similar frequency to those found in Tox+/− control host animals (Fig. 2c). However, we failed to detect lymph nodes in Tox−/− hosts (Supplementary Fig. 2). Thus, we conclude that the absence of lymph nodes and loss of Peyer’s patches in Tox−/− mice was likely caused by a defect in the generation of the primordia in the absence of TOX, rather than due to the abnormal cellular environment these mice.
Development of lymph nodes occurs during fetal development in both mice and humans and is dependent on CD4+ (in mice) LTi cells. LTi cells home to specific areas in the mesentery during embryogenesis and, through interaction with mesenchymal cells, initiate organogenesis of rudimentary lymph node structures. We asked if LTi cells were present in Tox−/− mice. Despite the fact that lymph node organogenesis is an embryonic process, LTi cells are still detected in the spleen of neonatal animals15, 30, 31 (Fig. 3a). However, in the absence of TOX, the frequency and absolute numbers of LTi cells was reduced over 10-fold (Fig. 3a-c). We also looked for the presence of fetal LTi cells in day E18 small intestines. Consistent with observations in neonatal spleens, fetal LTi cells were significantly reduced, and in many cases undetectable, in the absence of TOX (Fig. 3d,e). Similar results were obtained from E18 fetal spleen, even when CD4 was not used as a marker (data not shown).
We next asked whether Tox was normally expressed in populations of LTi cells. To facilitate isolation of LTi, we used splenocytes from RAG1-deficient mice, which lack T and B cells, to minimize contamination from these lymphocyte subsets. We isolated CD45+CD11c−CD3−B220−CD4+CD127+ splenic LTi cells, previously reported to be functionally indistinguishable from embryonic LTi cells30, and used them for gene expression analysis. These cells express Id2 (Fig. 3f) and Rorc (encoding RORγ(t)) (Fig. 3g), identifying them as LTi cells10, 21. Tox mRNA was detected in this subset (Fig. 3h), consistent with a cell intrinsic defect in LTi cell development in the absence of TOX. Fetal LTi cells also expressed Rorc (Fig. 3i) and Tox (Fig.3j). Together, these data indicate that the absence of lymph nodes is likely due to a cell-intrinsic defect in the production of LTi cells in Tox−/− mice.
Because RORγ(t) plays a role in the thymus as well as in LTi development10, 22, similar to TOX, we considered the possibility that RORγ(t) expression might be influenced by TOX. However, we did not observe any change in the expression of RORγ(t) in Tox−/− thymocytes compared to their wild-type counterparts by protein intracellular staining (Supplementary Fig. 3a). This is consistent with the fact that mice deficient in RORγ(t) do not phenocopy Tox−/− mice in terms of the T cell developmental defect22. In addition, we assessed Rorc gene expression in RorcGFP knock-in reporter mice10 and found similar Rorc gene expression in thymocytes from TOX-deficient and TOX- expressing cells (Supplementary Fig. 3b).
Because LTi and NK cells share many commonalities in their development program, including dependence on Ikaros and Id2 factors, we investigated whether NK cells development was dependent on TOX. In the bone marrow, approximately 15% of lineage-negative (Lin−) cells are mature NK cells (mNK) expressing the interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2R)β chain (CD122) and DX5 cell surface markers (Fig. 4a, top). In the absence of TOX, the frequency of these cells was reduced approximately 50-fold compared to the wild-type (Fig.4a, top). To eliminate the possibility that expression of CD122 was influenced by TOX, we additionally used NK1.1 and DX5 or NKp46 and CD122 to stain Lin− cells in the bone marrow (Fig. 4a, bottom and data not shown) and spleen (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Similar results were obtained when using these various staining strategies (Fig.4a and Supplementary Fig. 4a,b).
Within the Lin− CD122+ bone marrow cell population, these same markers can also be used to identify NK cell developmental stages21, 32, 33, including NK1.1−DX5− precursors (NKp), NK1.1+DX5− immature cells (iNK) and NK1.1+DX5+ mature NK cells (mNK). While both the NKp and iNK subsets were still present (with a trend towards a decrease in iNK), the mNK subpopulation was severely depleted in the absence of TOX (Fig. 4a,b). The inhibition of NK cell development was also apparent in the spleens of Tox−/− mice (Fig. 4c), where there was approximately a 40-fold decrease in frequency and absolute numbers of NK cells (Fig. 4d).
To determine if the inhibition of NK cell development could be due to a cell-intrinsic defect, we purified NK cell developmental subsets from the bone marrow and spleen of wild-type mice and analyzed the expression of Tox . Splenic B cells, which do not express TOX nor are developmentally affected by loss of TOX 27, were used as a biological negative control. Low amounts of Tox mRNA were detected in both bone marrow NKp and splenic NK subsets (Fig. 4e), while both iNK and mNK from bone marrow highly expressed Tox (Fig. 4e). The upregulation of Tox in iNK and mNK stages is consistent with the observed block in NK cell development in the absence of TOX (Fig. 4a,b). The fact that Tox is further downregulated in splenic compared to bone marrow mNK cells, may be an indication of continued maturation of these cells or additional micro-environmental or cell subset differences.
We isolated a small number of mature bone marrow NK cells from Tox−/− mice and assessed if they expressed Id2, an essential gene for the development of the NK cell lineage that is expressed subsequent to the NKp stage21. Interestingly, Tox−/− bone marrow mNK cells expressed less Id2 than their wild-type counterparts (Fig.4f). This suggests that either induction or maintenance of Id2 expression is influenced by TOX or that the NK cell lineage development block in Tox−/− mice occurs prior to full upregulation of the Id2 gene.
As shown above (Fig. 4c), some mature NK cells can be detected in the spleens of Tox−/− mice. To determine if these remaining NK cells were functional, we performed a cytolytic assay for NK activity in vivo, taking advantage of the fact that NK cells but not CD8+ T cells would kill otherwise syngeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I negative targets34. Thus, control or Tox−/− mice were injected with a differentially CFSE-labeled mix of wild-type and β2 microglobulin-deficient target cells, and the ratio of recovered target cells from the spleen was analyzed 16 hours later. Specific killing of the β2 microglobulin-deficient target cells by Tox−/− hosts was reduced by approximately two-thirds when compared to the killing activity of Tox+/− control hosts (Fig. 4g). This is consistent with the severe loss of mature NK cells from TOX-deficient mice. However, these data also suggest that NK cells that escape the developmental block maintain at least some effector function even in the absence of TOX.
To further study the cell-intrinsic role of TOX in developing NK cells, we made use of a stromal cell-free cell culture system that can support NK cells development from hematopoietic progenitor cells35. In this two-step system, a cytokine cocktail induces CD122+ NKp cells after 6-day of culture, which further develop into NK1.1+ DX5+ mNK cells upon 6 days of culture with IL-1535. Purified Tox+/−, but not Tox−/−, bone marrow Lin− Sca-1+cKit+ (LSK) produced NK cells in these cultures (Fig. 5a). These results recapitulated the in vivo phenotype of Tox−/− mice.
Both Tox+/− and Tox−/− bone marrow precursor cells produced progeny with similar expression of CD122 (Fig. 5b), arguing against a defect in differentiation or proliferation in Tox−/− progenitor cells in the primary culture. To further test the proliferative capacity of Tox−/− progenitors, we mixed highly purified phenotypically-marked wild-type and Tox−/− LSK cells at a ratio of 1:1 and analyzed their expansion after the 6 days of culture (Fig.5c). Tox−/− cells underwent greater expansion than wild-type cells in these cultures, arguing against an initial proliferative defect in the absence of TOX. Together, these data are consistent with a requirement for TOX subsequent to the progenitor stage of NK cell development in the bone marrow, and are also consistent with the peak of Tox expression in iNK cells.
We also considered the possibility that Tox−/− bone marrow progenitors had undergone irreversible lineage commitment prior to isolation, possibly as a result of altered cellular niches. However, in vitro NK cell development was restored upon retroviral-mediated expression of TOX in Tox−/− progenitors (Fig. 6a). In addition, TOX expression boosted the NK cell output from Tox+/− LSK cells, when compared to Tox+/− LSK cells infected with a control recombinant virus expressing the H-2Kb MHC molecule. This may suggest either that TOX is limiting in TOX heterozygous knockout mice or that sustained or increased TOX expression can promote the NK cell fate.
The E protein activity inhibitor Id2, like TOX, is required for both LTi and NK cell development20, 21, 36. In addition, the basic leucine zipper transcription factor E4BP4, which is also required for NK cell development, is upregulated, directly or indirectly, as a consequence of IL-15-mediated signaling and is an upstream regulator of Id224. Because mNK cells isolated from Tox−/− bone marrow had decreased expression of Id2 (Fig. 4f) we tested if expression of Id2 could compensate for loss of TOX, as it does for loss of E4BP424. Expression of Id2 was not able to rescue NK cell development from Tox−/− bone marrow progenitors (Fig. 6b). However, Id2 expression was able to efficiently inhibit the modest level of B cell production in these cultures, as expected due to the requirement for E protein activity during B cell development37 (Fig. 6c). These data demonstrate that the requirement for TOX in NK cell development cannot be solely attributed to control of Id2, and may indicate the presence of an additional regulatory pathway required for the development of both NK and LTi cell subsets.
We have demonstrated an essential role for TOX in the formation of peripheral lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches. The development of secondary lymphoid tissue is a complex process, involving both mesenchymal and hematopoietic cells. In the case of Peyer’s patch development, two cell types of hematopoietic origin, the LTi cells and the CD4−CD11c+ cells (the latter distinct from splenic dendritic cells)38 are involved. Whether these CD11c+ cells also play a role in lymph node development is not known. Here we show that in the absence of TOX LTi cells are severely depleted both from fetal and neonatal animals. In addition, both fetal and adult LTi cells normally express Tox. Thus, these results suggest that a defect in LTi cells production in the absence of TOX leads to the failure of normal secondary lymphoid tissue development. We have also shown that TOX is required for the development of NK cells. TOX is thus the third nuclear factor described to play a role in the development of both cell lineages, along with Ikaros and Id2.
TOX and Id2 deletion results in strikingly similar phenotypes regarding NK cell and secondary lymphoid tissue development. In terms of the latter, both TOX and Id2 appear to regulate a developmental stage subsequent to pNK differentiation21. However, some Peyer’s patch structures, albeit scarcer and smaller than normal, can be detected in the absence of TOX, while Id2−/− mice lack Peyer’s patches completely20, 21. Whether this difference relates to detection sensitivities or a true difference in the ‘leakiness’ of the two phenotypes remains to be determined.
Differences exist between embryonic development of Peyer’s patches and lymph nodes, including earlier embryonic development and reliance on TRANCE signaling for the latter39, 40, while loss of IL-7R leads primarily to absence of Peyer’s patches41, 42. A narrowed developmental window or a particularly stringent requirement for a full complement of LTi cells in lymph node development could explain the complete loss of these structures in Tox−/− mice, compared to presence of some small Peyer’s patches in these animals.
Despite the lack of lymph nodes, a small number of LTi-like cells can be identified in adult Tox−/− mice (J.K., unpublished observations). Adult LTi-like cells have other functions in the immune system, including production of IL-17 and IL-22, development of Aire+ epithelial cells in the thymic medulla and maintenance and organization of secondary lymphoid organs16-18. It will thus be of interest to determine if lack of TOX also impacts these functions.
NK cell development is highly dependent on IL-15 signaling and thus on expression of the IL-15 receptor23. However, the in vitro development of CD122+ NKp from TOX-deficient hematopoietic precursors demonstrates that the inhibition of NK cell development in the absence of TOX is not caused by failure to express CD122. In the thymus, TOX expression is dependent on TCR-mediated activation of calcineurin43. It has been argued that expression of E4BP4, and thus Id2, is downstream of IL-15 signaling24. Whether TOX is similarly regulated in this cell context remains to be determined.
Id2 is also upregulated following positive selection in the thymus, and TOX expression precedes Id2 expression during thymocyte progression through transitional stages of development (J.K., unpublished observations). However, Id2−/− mice do not display the defect in T cell development seen in mice that lack TOX, although compensatory effects by the related factor Id3 cannot be ruled out36. Although Tox−/− bone marrow NK cells expressed lower levels of Id2 mRNA, we found that ectopic expression of Id2 was not able to rescue NK cell development in the absence of TOX, as had been observed for the NK lineage factor E4BP424. While the exact relationship between TOX and Id2, if any, remains to be further elucidated, it is clear that the role of TOX in NK cell development is not solely as an upstream regulator of Id2.
The NK and LTi lineages have some interesting commonalities, although the exact developmental relationship between these cell types is still unclear. It is known for over a decade that neonatal CD45+CD4+CD3− mesenteric lymph nodes cells cultured in limiting dilution conditions in the presence of IL-2 and stromal cells produce NK1.1+ colonies with cytolytic activity8. This result is particularly interesting in relation to recent data characterizing NK-like and LTi-like cells in the gut. So-called LTi-like Lin− CD4+CD127+CD3− cells can be found in the spleen and intestinal lamina propria in mice, and these cells produce IL-17 and IL-22 and express RORγ(t)16, 44. Similarly, there is a CD127+ subset of LTi-like cells that can give rise to an IL-15-independent but RORγ(t)- and Id2-dependent NKp46+CD3− population found in the gut that also produces IL-2245-47. Cell subsets with similar properties are also found in human9, 48.
We have observed that some NKp46+CD3−RORγ(t)+ cells can still be found in the small intestine of Tox−/− mice (data not shown), consistent with data showing that these cells are distinct from both LTi cells and the major NK cell lineage9, 46-48. However, given the abnormal lymphocyte environment in the Tox−/− mice, which could influence the expansion of these cells, comparative quantification with normal animals is problematic, and earlier progenitor cell populations have not been well defined. Thus, we cannot formally rule out a role for TOX in the development of these distinct NK-like cell subsets. While the exact relationships between LTi and NK cell subpopulations and their precursors awaits additional clarification, the addition of TOX to the small list of known transcriptional regulators of LTi and NK cell lineages provides a new tool to address these issues.
TOX seems to play a non-redundant function in three aspects of development of the immune system- CD4 T cell development, NK cell development and LTi development. Somewhat analogous to the pattern of TOX expression during positive selection of thymocytes, expression of the Tox gene in the NK lineage is transiently upregulated during a key developmental transition. Indeed, the highest expression of TOX is predictive of the observed developmental block. In thymocytes, Tox is highly expressed by CD4+8lo thymocytes and is required for their development26, 27; in the bone marrow, Tox is highly expressed in iNK cells and is required for their continued development. Whether a similar pulse of expression can also be observed during a specific stage of LTi development in the fetus is thus of interest.
In sum, our data reveal TOX as an essential regulator of the development of multiple facets of the adaptive immune system, and add another commonality to the developmental pathways of NK cells and LTi cells.
All mice were bred at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or The Scripps Research Institute and kept under specific pathogen-free conditions. Experiments were conducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of animals and with approved animal protocols from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center or The Scripps Research Institute. Production of Tox−/− mice has been described previously27 and mice used in these experiments were on a mixed C57BL/6J and 129S6/SvEv genetic background. Toxfl/fl conditional knockout mice were produced similarly with the exception that following gene targeting and subsequent transient Cre expression, CMTI-1 mouse ES cells were selected for elimination of the selectable marker cassettes but maintenance of floxed exon 1. Unless stated otherwise, studies included Tox+/− littermates as experimental controls. Wild-type mice used were either C57BL/6J or B6.SJL-Ptprca (CD45.1+) mice, or Tox+/+ littermates. B6.129P2(Cg)-Rorctm2Litt/J (RorcGFP knock-in reporter mice)10, 49 were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory.
Recipient mice (CD45.1+ wild-type or CD45.2+ Tox−/−) were lethally irradiated (10 Gy) to deplete hematopoietic cells. Donor wild-type (CD45.1+) or Tox−/− (CD45.2+) Lin− bone marrow cells, enriched for hematopoietic progenitors by magnetic bead depletion (StemCell Technologies), were injected intravenously and chimeras were analyzed 6–8 weeks later.
Neonatal mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 4×106 total lymph node cells from CD45.1+ wild-type mice. After 4 weeks, chimerism was analyzed by the presence of donor T cells in the spleen. Presence of lymph nodes was performed by visual inspection.
Adult mice were given by intravenous injection (tail vein), a 1:1 mix of CFSElo-labeled wild-type and CFSEhi-labeled β2 microglobulin-deficient concanavalin A-activated (48 hr) spleen cell blasts as targets. Exact ratios of the two target populations was determined by flow cytometry of the mixed cells prior to injection. Ratios of CFSE-labeled cells were analyzed in the spleens of host animals by flow cytometry 16 hours post-injection. The percentage of specific lysis was determined by the following formulas: ratio = (percentage of CFSEhi/percentage of CFSElo); percentage of specific lysis = [1– (ratio post-injection/ratio pre-injection) × 100].
All antibodies were purchased from eBioscience or BD Biosciences and staining was performed as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Flow cytometry was performed as described previously43.
Mice were injected with a solution of 1% Chicago Sky Blue (Sigma) and analyzed 5 days later for dye uptake by peripheral lymph nodes. For visualization of Peyer’s patches, small intestines were submerged in a 7% solution of acetic acid in PBS for 5 minutes.
Serial 5 μm frozen sections from small intestines were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, DAPI to visualize nucleated cells (data not shown), or immunostained for expression of B220 and CD3ε and analyzed on Leica TCS SP spectral confocal microscope with white light laser and CytoView Software (Infinicyte, LLC).
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using the standard curve method, where samples were normalized based on Gapdh expression, and analyzed using SDS 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems). Primers for real-time RT-PCR were purchased from QIAGEN, except for Rorc 5′-CCGCTGAGAGGGCTTCAC and 5′-TGCAGGAGTAGGCCACATTACA.
Hematopoietic progenitor cells were isolated from total bone marrow, either by enrichment using magnetic bead-based negative selection with the mouse hematopoietic progenitor enrichment kit (StemCell Technologies) or by FACS sorting for LSK cells. Cells were cultured in a previously described two-step system35, where the first culture contained 20 ng/ml of IL-6, 0.5 ng/ml of IL-7, 50 ng/ml of SCF and 5 ng/ml of Flt3-L in complete RPMI for 6 days with a media change at day 3. Cells were then cultured in 20 ng/ml of IL-15 for an additional 6 days, before analysis for NK cell lineage markers.
Recombinant retroviruses encoding H-2Kb, TOX or Id2 (in the Mig-R1 vector, which contains an IRES-GFP cassette) were produced from transfected Plat-E packaging cells50 and used to infect hematopoietic progenitor cells. Cells were incubated with supernatant containing virus for 3 days in the initial cytokine cocktail described above. At day 3, cells were washed and continued culturing, also as described above.
The probability (P) associated with a Student’s t-Test using a two-tailed distribution of equal variance is shown in some Figures.
We thank K. Wawrowsky for expert assistance with confocal microscopy, P. Lin for cell sorting, A. Kadavallore for technical assistance, and A. Seksenyan for critical reading of this manuscript. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI054977 to J.K.).
Contributions P.A. and B.D. performed the experiments. P.A. and J.K. devised the experimental design, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.