|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
3-(2′-Deoxy-β-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)pyrimido-[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one (M1dG) is the major adduct derived from the reaction of DNA with the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde and the DNA peroxidation product base propenal. M1dG is mutagenic in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells, inducing base-pair substitutions (M1dG → A and M1dG → T) and frameshift mutations. Y-family polymerases may contribute to the mutations induced by M1dG in vivo. Previous reports described the bypass of M1dG by DNA polymerases η and Dpo4. The present experiments were conducted to evaluate bypass of M1dG by the human Y-family DNA polymerases κ, ι, and Rev1. M1dG was incorporated into template-primers containing either dC or dT residues 5′ to the adduct, and the template-primers were subjected to in vitro replication by the individual DNA polymerases. Steady-state kinetic analysis of single nucleotide incorporation indicates that dCMP is most frequently inserted by hPol κ opposite the adduct in both sequence contexts, followed by dTMP and dGMP. dCMP and dTMP were most frequently inserted by hPol ι, and only dCMP was inserted by Rev1. hPol κ extended template-primers in the order M1dG:dC > M1dG:dG > M1dG:dT ~ M1dG:dA, but neither hPol ι nor Rev1 extended M1dG-containing template-primers. Liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry analysis of the products of hPol κ-catalyzed extension verified this preference in the 3′-GXC-5′ template sequence but revealed the generation of a series of complex products in which dAMP is incorporated opposite M1dG in the 3′-GXT-5′ template sequence. The results indicate that DNA hPol κ or the combined action of hPol ι or Rev1 and hPol κ bypass M1dG residues in DNA and generate products that are consistent with some of the mutations induced by M1dG in mammalian cells.
Endogenous DNA damage is a key event contributing to human diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration (1−3). Lipid peroxidation and DNA peroxidation are major sources of endogenous DNA damage (4,5). M1dG1 (3-(2′-deoxy-β-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)pyrimido-[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one) is a member of a unique class of endogenous DNA adducts that are derived from electrophiles generated by both lipid peroxidation and DNA peroxidation (Figure (Figure1)1) (6,7). In this regard, DNA peroxidation appears to be a particularly important source of M1dG (8). M1dG adducts have been detected routinely in healthy humans at levels of ~1−4 adducts per 108 nucleotides (9−12). Structural studies reveal that when placed in duplex DNA, opposite to dC, M1dG undergoes hydrolytic ring opening to N2-(3-oxo-1-propenyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine (N2-OPdG) (Figure (Figure1)1) (13,14). Both M1dG and OPdG are mutagenic in bacteria (Escherichia coli) and mammalian cells (COS-7), but the mutation frequency induced by M1dG is higher than N2-OPdG (15,16). The types of mutations induced by M1dG in site-specific mutagenesis experiments include base pair substitutions (M1dG → A ~ T > C), frameshifts, and untargeted mutations (15,16). The polymerases responsible for M1dG mutagenesis have not been unequivocally identified in mammalian cells, but the error-prone DNA polymerase V plays an important role in E. coli(15).
In the past decade, a specialized class of DNA polymerases called Y-family polymerases has been discovered in both prokaryotic, archaeal, and eukaryotic organisms (17−19). These polymerases are capable of bypassing a large variety of DNA lesions with low efficiency and fidelity (20,21). Humans express five translesion DNA polymerases, four belonging to the Y-family, Pol η, Pol ι, Pol κ, and Rev1 (18,22), and one B-family member, Pol ζ (23).
Recent studies show that both hPol η and Dpo4 (an archeal homologue of hPol κ) perform translesion DNA synthesis on templates containing M1dG. Replication is error-prone and results in the insertion of dAMP opposite the adduct or insertion of dNMP opposite the 5′-template base to generate a one-base deletion (24,25). The insertion of dAMP opposite M1dG leads to the occurrence of M1dG → dT transversions in the second round of replication. Previous studies establish that M1dG induces both transition and transversion mutations at similar frequencies in COS-7 cells so it is possible that multiple translesion polymerases are responsible for its mutation spectrum (16). Thus, in the present study we investigated the ability of hPol κ, hPol ι, and Rev1 to perform translesion DNA synthesis on a template-primer containing a single M1dG adduct. Our results indicate that all three polymerases are able to insert dNMPs opposite M1dG but that Rev1 and hPol ι are more efficient than hPol κ at inserting dCMP opposite the lesion. In contrast, and as reported earlier for related exocyclic DNA adducts (26−28), hPol κ is able to extend past M1dG whereas hPol ι and Rev1 are not. The results of the experiments suggest Pol ι, Rev1, and Pol κ may cooperate in bypassing M1dG residues and may introduce mutations that are observed in cellular mutagenesis experiments.
Full-length recombinant hPol κ and hPol ι were purchased from Enzymax (Lexington, KY). T4 polynucleotide kinase and E. coli uracil DNA glycosylase were obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). [γ-32P]ATP was purchased from Perkin-Elmer. Core hPol κ (aa 19−526) and full-length Rev1 proteins were prepared as described previously (29,30).
The M1dG-containing oligonucleotides were synthesized by a postsynthetic modification strategy as described previously and purified by HPLC (19). The unmodified oligonucleotides (HPLC-purified) were purchased from integrated DNA technologies (Coralville, IA). The sequences of the oligonucleotides are shown in Table Table11.
The 18-mer primer oligonucleotide was 5′-phosphorylated with T4 polynucleotide kinase in the presence of 250 μCi of [γ32-P]ATP (>6000 Ci/mmol), 50 mM Na-MOPS buffer (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM DTT for 1 h at 37 °C. The 23-mer templates containing either dG or M1dG were annealed with radioactively labeled 18-mer primers (1:1 molar ratio) and heated to 95 °C for 3 min, followed by slow cooling overnight.
Primer extension and individual nucleotide insertion reactions for M1dG-containing substrates were conducted at 37 °C in 20 μL of buffered solutions containing 50 mM Na-MOPS (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 10 μg of BSA, 10% glycerol (v/v), 50 nM primer-template complexes, and 500 μM dNTP mix (all four dNTPs) or 500 μM individual dNTPs (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, or dTTP). Polymerases were added to the following final concentation: 5 nM of hPol κ, hPol ι, or hRev1. Corresponding unmodified primer/template complexes were extended as controls, and the reaction conditions for the unmodified DNA substrates were the same as those for the modified templates. The reactions were quenched after preselected time intervals (0−120 min) by the addition of 6 μL of stop solution (10 mM EDTA, 95% formamide (v/v), 0.03% bromophenol blue (w/v), 0.03% xylene cyanol (w/v)) to a 4 μL aliquot of the sample. Reaction products were separated by gel electrophoresis (20% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea) at a constant voltage (2500 V) for 3 h. The radioactive products were then visualized using a phosphorImager and quantified using Quantity One software.
Steady-state kinetic reactions were performed for both unadducted or single M1dG adducted substrates in the presence of 50 mM Na-MOPS buffer (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 μg/mL BSA, 5% glycerol (v/v), 50 nM annealed 5′-end-labeled primer-template, 5 nM hPol κ, hPol ι, or Rev1, and varying concentrations of individual dNTPs (0−800 μM). Samples were incubated at 37 °C for different time periods. Reactions were terminated by addition of 36 μL of 95% formamide (w/v), 10 mM EDTA, 0.03% bromophenol blue (w/v), and 0.03% xylene cyanol (v/v) and heated at 95 °C for 2 min to ensure reaction quenching. Products were separated on 20% polyacrylamide (w/v)/7 M urea gels by electrophoresis at a constant voltage (2500 V) for 3 h. Radioactive products were then visualized using a phosphorImager, and the bands corresponding to single nucleotide-extended primer were quantified using Quantity One software. For the determination of steady-state kinetic values, graphs of product formation versus dNTP concentration were plotted using nonlinear regression analysis (one-site hyperbolic fits in GraphPad Prism).
Pre-steady-state experiments were performed using a KinTek RQF-3 model chemical quench-flow apparatus (KinTek Corp., Austin, TX) with 50 mM Na-MOPS (pH 7.5) buffer in the drive syringes. The rapid quench reactions were carried out at 37 °C in the presence of 50 mM MOPS (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10 μg/mL BSA, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 50 nM annealed 5′-end-labeled primer-template, 25 nM hPol κ, and 1 mM dCTP. Polymerase catalysis was stopped at different time points by the addition of 500 mM EDTA (pH 9.0). Substrate and product DNA were separated by electrophoresis on a 20% polyacrylamide (w/v)/7 M urea gel. Results obtained under single-turnover conditions were fit to the equation
where A is the product formed in the first extension event, kobs is the rate constant defining polymerization under the conditions used for the experiment being analyzed, and t is time.
Control and M1dG-containing 18-mer templates were primed with 13-mer sequences containing uracil. Human Pol κ (core enzyme, 19−526) (5 μM) was preincubated with primer-template DNA (10 μM), and the reaction was initiated by addition of dNTP (1 mM each) and MgCl2 (10 mM) in a final volume of 200 μL. Reactions were allowed to proceed at 37 °C for 5 h in the presence of 50 mM Na-MOPS (pH 7.5) buffer, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg/mL BSA, and 5% glycerol (v/v). The reaction was terminated by extraction of the remaining dNTPs using a size-exclusion chromatography column (Bio-Spin 6 chromatography column; Bio-Rad). Concentrated stocks of Na-MOPS (pH 7.5), DTT, and EDTA were added to restore the concentrations to 50, 5, and 1 mM, respectively. Later, E. coli uracil DNA glycosylase (20 units) was added, and the solution was incubated at 37 °C overnight to hydrolyze the uracil residue on the extended primer. The reaction mixture was then heated at 95 °C for 1 h in the presence of 0.25 M piperidine, followed by removal of the solvent by centrifugation under vacuum. The dried sample was resuspended in 100 μL of H2O for MS analysis. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on a Waters Aquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) connected to a Finnigan LTQ mass spectrometer operating in the ESI negative ion mode, as described previously (31,32). An estimate for the amount of each product in the reaction mixture was made by integrating the area of the corresponding peak in a selected ion trace for the ion of interest.
Primer extension studies were performed in order to investigate the ability of hPol κ to synthesize DNA from templates containing a single M1dG lesion. Templates containing M1dG at the 19th position from the 3′ end of the template were annealed to 32P-labeled 18-mer primers. The results of in vitro synthesis from M1dG-containing templates are shown in two different sequence contexts, one containing dC and the other containing dT immediately 5′ to the M1dG residue (Figure (Figure2).2). Similar results were obtained in both sequence contexts. The extent of synthesis was reduced by the presence of M1dG in the template, so that product lengths were shorter at each time point when synthesis was catalyzed from M1dG-containing templates as compared to controls. The shorter bands can result from incomplete extension or deletions. In the present case, the principal source is incomplete extension (see below).
To investigate hPol κ’s ability to insert each nucleotide opposite the lesion, experiments were conducted in which control or M1dG-modified templates were incubated with the enzyme and single dNTPs (Figure (Figure3).3). All four dNTPs were incorporated in control and M1dG-containing DNA in both sequence contexts. Differences were observed in the migration of some of the products between unadducted and adducted templates as a result of the incorporation of different numbers of dNTPs.
The results in Figure Figure33 suggested that hPol κ’s nucleotide insertion efficiency is different opposite M1dG as opposed to dG. Consequently, steady-state kinetic reactions were performed in order to quantify the single nucleotide preference of hPol κ during insertion opposite M1dG in both sequence contexts (Table (Table2).2). The specificity constant (kcat/Km) provides a measure of the catalytic efficiency for each dNTP insertion reaction and allows comparisons to be made between dNTP insertion events. Kinetic analysis of the hPol κ-catalyzed insertion of dCMP opposite dG yielded Km and kcat values comparable to those reported previously (33). The insertion of dCMP opposite M1dG was the most favored reaction for the 3′-GXC-5′ template and was 33-fold less efficient than insertion of dCMP opposite dG (Table (Table2).2). A similar result was obtained using the 3′-GXT-5′ template, in which incorporation of dCMP opposite M1dG was 25-fold less efficient than incorporation of dCMP opposite dG. hPol κ inserted dTMP, dGMP, and dAMP opposite the M1dG lesion 5-, 7.5-, and 15-fold less efficiently than dCMP incorporation opposite the lesion in the 3′-GXC-5′ context. Similar catalytic efficiencies were observed with the 3′-GXT-5′ template although the incorporation of dGMP was slightly greater than the incorporation of dTMP. As observed with the 3′-GXC-5′ template, incorporation of dAMP was slowest. These results suggest that hPol κ preferentially incorporates dCMP opposite M1dG in vitro in both sequence contexts and that other dNMPs are incorporated at somewhat reduced rates.
Transient-state kinetic analysis was used to further assess the catalytic properties of hPol κ in bypassing the M1dG lesion. Template-primers (50 nM) were combined with 25 nM hPol κ and then mixed with an excess of dCTP. The reaction was quenched after different reaction times. The time course of dCMP incorporation in experiments with an unadducted template displayed typical burst kinetics and indicated that 100% of the enzyme molecules were bound to template/primer in a productive manner when dCTP was added to the reaction mixture (Figure (Figure4).4). The observed rate (kobs) in the control reaction was very similar to the maximum forward rate of polymerization (kpol) reported elsewhere (29). dCMP incorporation from adducted templates was significantly inhibited compared to the unadducted templates. The amplitude of product formation decreased roughly 90%, and the observed rate constant for dCMP insertion opposite M1dG decreased 43-fold (Figure (Figure4).4). Thus, the transient-state kinetic results are consistent with results obtained in the steady-state kinetic experiments, demonstrating M1dG significantly reduces the efficiency of replication by hPol κ.
A key determinant of the outcome of replication is the rate at which primers containing different dNMPs opposite M1dG are extended. We performed next-base extension studies by using primers containing different dNMPs opposite either dG or M1dG in the template strand. Only template-primers containing the 3′-GXC-5′ sequence were used for these studies; the various template-primers containing different primer termini were incubated with hPol κ and dGTP (Table (Table3).3). As expected, dGMP incorporation was most efficient when the primer terminus contained dC opposite dG in the template. The rates of extension of a mismatched dN primer-dG template were significantly reduced. The rates of extension of primer-templates containing various dNMPs opposite M1dG were also significantly reduced compared to the extension of the dC primer-dG template. However, the rate of extension of the dC primer-M1dG template was greater than the rates of extension of the other mismatched dN:M1dG primer-template termini. In order to probe for the potential for extension of slipped mispairs at the primer-template termini, the rates of extension of dG:dG and dG:M1dG by incorporation of dTMP were determined. The rates were comparable to those measured for the incorporation of dGMP from either primer-template. The rate of extension of dG:M1dG was somewhat greater than dG:dG. Thus, mispairing may contribute to the production of the incomplete extension products observed in Figure Figure22.
The primer extension experiments described above for hPol κ were also conducted with hPol ι and Rev1 (ratio of template-primer:enzyme of 10:1). The results revealed that both hPol ι and Rev1 inserted dNMPs opposite M1dG but did not extend beyond the insertion site (Figure (Figure5).5). The identity of the deoxynucleotides inserted was probed with single nucleotide incorporation experiments (Tables (Tables44 and and5).5). hPol ι inserted dCMP or dTMP opposite M1dG most efficiently. Steady-state kinetic analysis (Table (Table4)4) indicated that hPol ι inserted dCMP opposite M1dG approximately 7-fold or 21-fold less efficiently than opposite dG: kcat/Km values for dCMP incorporation opposite M1dG were 0.1 and 0.08 μM−1 min−1 in the 3′-GXC-5′ and 3′-GXT-5′ template sequence contexts, respectively. The insertion of dCMP opposite M1dG by Rev1 was about half as efficient as the insertion of dCMP opposite dG (Table (Table55).
Hpol κ full-length extension products with an unmodified DNA substrate were analyzed by LC-MS in order to establish the level of background misinsertion events detected by this method. Deoxyuridine was placed in the penultimate position of the primer, which enabled uracil DNA glycosylase to be used to remove the 5′ end of the primer. The oligonucleotide products were analyzed by LC-MS/MS as described elsewhere (31,32). Two major product ions were identified in the spectra (Figure (Figure6).6). Both represented accurate copying of the template strand. The first (m/z = 1087, M1 − 2H) was determined to be correct insertion of dCTP opposite dG, followed by accurate full-length extension. The second ion (m/z = 930, M2 − 2H) was identified as an accurate copying event that terminates one base short of the 5′-terminus of the template DNA.
Parallel reactions were conducted with templates containing M1dG in the 3′-GXC-5′ or 3′GXT-5′ sequence. The molecular ions of the major products of replication past M1dG in the 3′-GXC-5′ (A, B, and C) and 3′-GXT-5′ (D, E, and F) contexts, as well as the identities of the products and their relative abundances are shown in Figure Figure7.7. The major products in both contexts resulted from insertion of dCMP opposite the M1dG residue, as anticipated from the results of the single nucleotide insertion experiments. In the 3′-GXC-5′ context, other products resulted from insertion of dAMP or dTMP opposite M1dG and a one-base deletion in which dGMP was inserted opposite the template dC immediately 5′ to M1dG. Interestingly, some products appeared to result from insertion of TGG or ACG opposite the template, XC, which potentially led to misinsertion and a one-base addition. In the 3′-GXT-5′ context, the only products resulted from dCMP or dAMP insertion. A small amount of a one-base deletion product was observed in which dAMP was inserted opposite template dT, immediately 5′ to M1dG, but the major products resulting from dAMP incorporation also displayed mispaired sequences beyond the initial insertion point. Some truncated extension products were observed in both sequence contexts regardless of the identity of the base inserted opposite M1dG.
The present results demonstrate that hPol κ, hPol ι, and Rev1 are able to insert deoxynucleotides opposite M1dG and that hPol κ is able to extend template-primers containing deoxynucleotides opposite the lesion. All three enzymes preferentially inserted dCMP opposite M1dG but the efficiency of insertion of dCMP by Rev1 and hPol ι was approximately 15- and 4-fold higher than the insertion of dCMP by hPol κ, respectively. hPol ι inserted dTMP 13−16-fold less efficiently than dCMP (depending on sequence context) and inserted purine deoxynucleosides very poorly. In contrast, hPol κ inserted dTMP, dGMP, and dAMP at comparable rates, which are 5−10-fold lower than the rate of incorporation of dCMP. Single nucleotide incorporation experiments indicate that hPol κ extended template-primers containing dC opposite M1dG approximately 10-fold more efficiently than template-primers containing other deoxynucleotides opposite the adduct when it is contained in the 3′-GXC-5′ sequence. The product of the rates of hPol κ-catalyzed insertion of dCMP opposite M1dG and one-base extension past dC-M1dG was 400-fold lower than the product of the same rates for hPol κ acting on unmodified template-primers (1/0.03 × 0.08). So although hPol κ is capable of bypassing M1dG lesions, it is much less efficient than when it is acting on unmodified templates.
LC/MS analyses of the products of hPol κ-catalyzed extension of template-primers containing M1dG indicate that dCMP was incorporated opposite the lesion in 50% of the products, regardless of whether the sequence of the template was 3′-GXC-5′ or 3′-GXT-5′. The remaining products arose from roughly equal incorporation of dTMP or dAMP opposite M1dG in the 3′-GXC-5′ context or exclusively dAMP in the 3′GXT-5′ context. Analysis of bypass products captures the outcome of both insertion and extensions so some differences from the results of individual insertion and extension experiments are anticipated. For example, bypass product analysis in the 3′-GXT-5′ sequence context revealed that insertion of dAMP opposite the lesion accounted for one-half of the products, a finding that would not have been predicted from the results of the single nucleotide insertion experiments alone. Because a dT residue was positioned 5′ to the lesion, slippage or misalignment might have occurred to enable lesion bypass to generate deletion products. Such deletion products were detected by mass spectrometry and were expected based on detection of truncated products from 32P-labeled template-primers by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Figure (Figure2).2). However, it is noteworthy that most of the truncated oligonucleotide products were incomplete extension products rather than nucleotide deletion products.
The present results are reminiscent of the results of hPol κ and hPol ι bypass of the exocyclic adducts propanodeoxyguanosine (PdG), γ-hydroxy-PdG, and the alkyl-substituted γ-hydroxy-PdG adducts derived from reaction of 4-hydroxynonenal with dG (26−28). In all cases, hPol ι incorporated dCMP opposite the lesion nearly as efficiently as it incorporated dCMP opposite dG, but hPol ι did not extend past the lesion. Human Pol ι also incorporates dTMP opposite the exocyclic lesions but less efficiently than dCMP. Human Pol κ inserted dCMP opposite the exocyclic lesions less efficiently than hPol ι did, but hPol κ was able to extend template-primers containing dNMPs opposite the adducts. These observations led to the hypothesis that hPol ι and hPol κ collaborate to effect bypass such that hPol ι catalyzes insertion and hPol κ catalyzes extension (26). A similar hypothesis could be advanced to include Rev1, along with hPol ι and hPol κ, on the basis of the present experiments, although multiple factors will affect bypass at the replication fork (e.g., the amounts of the various bypass polymerases in a cell, relative catalytic activities, and their propensity for interaction with ancillary replication machinery, such as PCNA).
A significant difference exists in the hPol κ-catalyzed extension of template-primers containing dC opposite M1dG as compared to γ-hydroxy-PdG. hPol κ catalyzes extension of the dC:M1dG mismatch approximately 12.5-fold less efficiently than it catalyzed the extension of a dC:dG match (Table (Table3).3). In contrast, hPol κ catalyzes extension of the dC:γ-hydroxy-PdG mismatch 3.3-fold more efficiently than it catalyzes extension of a dC:dG match (26). This dramatic difference in extension kinetics is proposed to be due to the relative propensities of M1dG and γ-hydroxy-PdG to ring-open in the active site of a polymerase. Both adducts ring-open in duplex DNA when placed opposite dC residues (13,34); neither adduct ring-opens when placed opposite dT residues in duplex DNA. M1dG opens to 2-(3-oxopropenyl)-dG whereas γ-hydroxy-PdG opens to 2-(3-oxopropyl)-dG (Figure (Figure8).8). Both ring-opened adducts lie in the minor groove and do not prevent Watson−Crick base pairing between the adducted dG and the dC opposite it. Thus, the ring-opened adducts are more easily bypassed and are less miscoding than the ring-closed adducts. The high efficiency of Pol κ-catalyzed extension of template-primers containing dC opposite γ-hydroxy-PdG has been proposed to reflect extension of the hydrogen-bonded dC:2-(3-oxopropyl)-dG base pair (26). Support for this hypothesis is provided by the observation that hPol κ is very inefficient at extending template-primers containing dC:PdG termini (27). In contrast to γ-hydroxy-PdG, PdG is chemically stable in duplex DNA and does not ring-open.
The prior results of extension of dC:γ-hydroxy-PdG-containing template-primers by hPol κ imply that the dC:2-(3-oxopropyl)-dG base pair binds to hPol κ or that ring opening occurs in the active site. The low efficiency of extension of dC:M1dG-containing template-primers by hPol κ suggests that the adduct remains ring-closed, both in solution and in the hPol κ active site. The latter conclusion is consistent with recent work from our laboratory, which reported the structure of a template-primer containing a dC-M1dG terminus bound in the active site of the archeal Y-family polymerase, Dpo4 (25). The M1dG adduct was present in the Dpo4 active site in the ring-closed form, and the dC residue was rotated out of the active site and lay in the minor groove. Although this configuration is not productive from the standpoint of extension, its existence implies that a dC:2-(3-oxopropenyl)-dG base pair does not form or is not stable in the active site of a Y-family polymerase. In fact, it may also provide insights into why the extension of dC:M1dG template-primers is so slow, because the dC residue must rotate to a position where its 3′-hydroxyl group can attack the α-phosphoryl group of an incoming dNTP.
The present results, taken with prior studies of hPol η, provide a comprehensive picture of bypass of M1dG lesions by Y-family DNA polymerases. The kinetics of insertion and extension by hPol η, hPol κ, hPol ι, and Rev1, as well as the identity of the products formed, have been determined for M1dG residues contained in the same template-primer sequence. To a first approximation, it appears that hPol η is responsible for incorporation of dAMP opposite M1dG while Rev1, hPol ι, and hPol κ are responsible for incorporation of dCMP and dTMP. Both hPol η and hPol κ introduce frameshift mutations at the site of the adduct. These events correlate to the spectrum of mutations induced by M1dG on a shuttle vector replicated in COS-7 monkey kidney cells (16). Mutations were induced at a frequency of 2%, and M1dG → T predominated over M1dG → A; frameshifts occurred but only when the lesion was located in a reiterated sequence context. We propose that M1dG → T mutations are introduced by hPol η and M1dG → A mutations are introduced by a combination of hPol ι and hPol κ. Frameshift mutations can be introduced by either hPol η or hPol κ. Interestingly, nontargeted mutations were observed at sites near but past the lesion site (16). This type of nontargeted mutation is observed with hPol κ but not hPol η (Figure (Figure6).6). It will interesting to evaluate the importance of individual Y-family polymerases in M1dG bypass in intact cells to determine if the results of in vitro experiments can be extrapolated to more complex cellular systems.
National Institutes of Health, United States
†This work was supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health [R37 CA087819 (L.J.M.), K99 GM084460 (R.L.E.), R01 ES10375 (F.P.G.), and P30 ES000267 (F.P.G., L.J.M.)].