Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2940321

Transnuclear mice with pre-defined T Cell Receptor specificities against Toxoplasma gondii obtained via SCNT


Mice transgenic for rearranged antigen-specific T cell receptors (TCR) are essential tools to study T cell development and function. Such TCRs are usually isolated from the relevant T cells after long-term culture, often following repeated antigen stimulation, which unavoidably skews the T cell population used. Random genomic integration of the TCR α- and β-chain and expression from non-endogenous promoters represent additional drawbacks of transgenics. Using epigenetic reprogramming via somatic cell nuclear transfer, we demonstrate that T cells with pre-defined specificities against Toxoplasma gondii can be used to generate mouse models that express the TCR from their endogenous loci, without experimentally introduced genetic modification. The relative ease and speed with which such transnuclear models can be obtained holds promise for the construction of other disease models.

The resolution of an infectious disease requires careful orchestration of innate and adaptive immunity. B and T cells specific for infectious agents are not easily obtained in abundant and pure form, yet their availability is crucial in defining their activation requirements and protective properties, either as a single clone or as an ensemble of different specificities. During the peak of an immune response as many as 30% of all CD8+ T cells may be pathogen-specific (1, 2). For viral pathogens such as vaccinia virus or mouse herpes virus-68, several dozen antigens may be recognized by CD8+ and CD4+ T cells (35). Existing T cell receptor transgenic mouse models have all been constructed from T cell clones or hybridomas selected for survival and response to antigens in vitro. Whether these transgenic mouse models accurately reflect the affinities and activation requirements of lymphocytes triggered during a physiological response to an infection is not known.

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) allows the generation of ES cells and mice from any somatic cell through epigenetic reprogramming without the introduction of genetic modifications (68). The specificity of T or B cell receptors (TCR or BCR) is determined by site-specific recombination of their V, D and J gene segments. Consequently, when SCNT is applied to lymphocytes of known specificity, these genetic V(D)J rearrangements are transferred to the SCNT-embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and the mice derived from them, while epigenetic marks are reset (Fig. 1A). Natural Killer T cells (NKT) carrying an invariant TCR, as well as T and B cells of unknown specificity, have been used as donor cells for SCNT, demonstrating that mice can be cloned from such cells and that their rearranged TCR- or Ig-loci can be transmitted through the germline (912).

Fig. 1
SCNT of pre-defined T cells

Here we apply this approach to create new mouse model by using effector CD8+ T cells specific for Toxoplasma gondii, isolated at the height of resolving an acute infection. We focused on these cells because protective immunity against this protozoan critically depends on interferon (IFN)-γ produced by CD8+ T cells (13, 14). We had identified two naturally processed epitopes, Ld-Tg-Rop7161–169 (R7) and Ld-Tg-Gra4107–115 (G4), restricted by the major histocompatibility complex antigen (MHC-I) H-2Ld and recognized by CD8+ T cells (15). Using a similar approach, a screen for epitopes recognized by H-2Kb or H-2Db let to the identification of one epitope restricted by H-2b, Kb-Tg-tgd05759–66 (T57) a protein of unknown function, likely to be secreted (16). One additional H-2d epitope, Ld-Tg-Gra6215–224, was identified in parallel (17). However, there has been no mouse model that provides access to naïve antigen-inexperienced T. gondii-specific T cells.

We used CD8+ T cells specific for R7, G4, and T57 on the BL/6 × Balb/c F1 (B6CF1) background as donor cells for SCNT, a procedure that is more efficient for donor nuclei of mixed background (6). We used Trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases, to improve nuclear reprogramming (Fig. 1B). We generated SCNT-blastocysts with an overall efficiency of 7.2% per pseudo-pronucleus (PPN) in all three conditions, and obtained ESCs when using TSA treatment for 6h (4 ESC lines) or 10h (1 ESC line), but none in the absence of TSA. As a control, fertilized blastocysts on the B6CF1 background yielded 47 ESCs per 48 blastocysts (fig. S1A). When CD8+ T cells from a pure Balb/c background were used as donor cells, we derived 2 SCNT-ESC lines with similar efficiency (fig. S1B), but only after 10h TSA treatment, confirming reports that TSA indeed facilitates cloning of inbred mice (7, 18).

We generated chimeric mice using the five SCNT-ESC lines from the B6CF1 background, all of which showed pronounced populations of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in the absence of infection with T. gondii (Fig. 1C). Chimeric mice derived from the two SCNT-ESC lines on the Balb/c background also yielded CD8+ T cells of correct specificity (fig. S1C). We thus cloned T cells of desired specificity in seven out of seven cases, a rate that depends on both TSA treatment and the ability to obtain donor cells of sufficient purity. We refer to these animals as transnuclear (TN) mice because such mice, generated via SCNT of T cells (or B cells) with pre-selected specificity, represent a new type of mouse model.

To test for germline transmission and to establish TN mouse lines, chimeric mice with T57 T cells (H-2b restricted) were backcrossed onto the MHC-matched BL/6 background. Offspring with agouti coat color indicated germline-transmission (fig. S1D). Chimeric mice with H-2d restricted T cells (G4 and R7) were backcrossed onto the MHC-matched Balb/c background and offspring with white coat color indicated germline transmission (fig. S1D). All litters from transmitting males were analyzed either by PCR or flow cytometry to identify offspring carrying the corresponding TCR (fig. S1E–G). We secured germline transmission of the respective TCRs in five out of five SCNT-ESC lines derived from the B6CF1 background. No germline transmission was achieved for the two SCNT-ES cell lines from the Balb/c background. The resulting animals represented three different TCR specificities (T57, G4, and R7), restricted by two different MHC-I alleles (H-2Ld and H-2Kb).

We next identified the genomic TCR rearrangements from the TN mice on the B6CF1 background (Fig. 2A, fig. S2A–B) by RACE-PCR. Examination of the cDNA sequences obtained showed that the three SCNT-ESC lines specific for R7 were different from each other. A comparison of their amino acid sequences revealed no obvious pattern of the complementary determining region 3 (CDR3) that would explain their shared specificity (fig. S2C).

Fig. 2
TCR sequence and comparison of TN T cells with wildtype and transgenic mice

To characterize TN mice, we compared splenocytes from the T57 line with B6CF1 wildtype mice and a widely used TCR transgenic line also restricted by H-2Kb, OT-I, specific for a chicken ovalbumin-derived peptide (SIINFEKL) (19). A comparison of T cells (CD3+) and B cells (B220+) showed that the TN line had a relative increase in the CD3+ population (35.6% for TN versus 12.8% for B6CF1 wildtype) and that this population consisted mainly of CD8+ T cells (91.3% for TN versus 43.1% for wildtype, Fig. 2B). A skewing in the CD8+ population was also apparent in the OT-I line (84.8%), but without a relative increase in CD3+ cells (17.7%). The majority of CD8+ TN cells were CD44low CD62L+, indicative of a naïve phenotype (64.1% for T57 versus 69.6% for wildtype). We also compared the TN line G4 to the transgenic line 2C (Fig. 2C). The alloreactive 2C line was derived from a Balb/b mouse (H-2b) injected with H-2d cells (H-2b anti H-2d). Its response against the QL9 peptide is particularly well characterized (2022). Similar patterns were observed for the two TN lines G4 and T57. TN mice expressing only a single copy of a pre-rearranged endogenous β-chain had no major changes in T cell subsets, whereas TN mice expressing a single copy of a pre-rearranged endogenous α-chain had an increase in CD3+ CD4 CD8 cells in the spleen (fig. S3A–B). Finally, we found that T cell development in TN mice T57 and G4 in all aspects examined resembles that of B6CF1 wildtype mice, and of some transgenic lines (fig. S4A–D, fig. S5A–B).

Because TN CD8+ T cells were generated from freshly isolated effector CD8+ T cells, we hypothesized that TN T cells may have MHC binding characteristics distinct from conventional TCR transgenic mice. In a MHC-I-tetramer dissociation assay, the TN CD8+ T cells of H-2Ld haplotype dissociated faster from their cognate peptide-MHC-I complex than did transgenic 2C cells (Fig. 3A). The observed differences in dissociation rate of the H-2Ld T cells are not due to differences in peptide-MHC interactions, since the peptides QL9, G4, and R7 stabilized H-2Ld in transporter of antigen processing (TAP)-deficient cells equally well (Fig. 3B). Although we are aware of the limitations of tetramer dissociation as a surrogate parameter for TCR affinity (23), we consider it possible that the average T. gondii-specific H-2Ld-restricted TCR may well be of lower affinity than the highly selected 2C. A comparison of TN T57 with transgenic OT-I cells showed similar dissociation rates (Fig. 3C). We examined the ability of TN CD8+ T cells to produce IFN-γ upon stimulation with peptide-loaded antigen-presenting cells in vitro. TN T cells secreted IFN-γ only when stimulated with the corresponding peptide (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3
TN T cell function in vitro

To assess the extent to which the presence of only the TCR α- or β-chain suffices to yield TCRs of specificity similar to that of the TN αβ pair, we analyzed mice that carry only the TN α- or only the TN β-chain of T57 or G4 (fig. S6A). There was no increase in tetramer-positive T cells in mice carrying the TN β-chain or α-chain only.

We next compared the in vivo response of wildtype BL/6 and TN CD8+ T cells to an infection with T. gondii (Fig. 4A–B, fig. S6B–E). In wildtype mice, we detect T57 tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells mainly between day 9 to 15 post infection, with a maximum frequency of about 7% (fig. S6B). When T57 CD8+ T cells were adoptively transferred into wildtype mice, the kinetics of expansion were comparable, but with a much higher frequency of T57 tetramer-positive CD8+ TN T cells (about 60%) (Fig. 4A–B). We detected little or no response from the endogenous CD8+ T cells in these mice that received TN T cells (Fig4A, fig. S6C). Similarly, when CFSE-labeled CD8+ T cells from wildtype or T57 mice were transferred into recipient mice and subsequently infected with T. gondii, upregulation of CD69 and dilution of CFSE was only observed in mice receiving T57 T cells (fig. S6D–E).

Fig. 4
TN T57 T cell function in vivo

We next investigated the protective potential of CD8+ T cells from T57 TN mice. Animals infected with a lethal dose of T. gondii die around day 10, and some of the CD8+ T cell responses do not peak before that time (1517). When B6CF1 mice were challenged with a lethal dose of T. gondii, 4 out of 7 mice receiving CD8+ T cells from T57 TN mice survived the acute phase of infection, compared to 1 out of 7 in the control group (Fig. 4C). Using live imaging in the course of a lethal challenge with luciferase-expressing T. gondii, we observed a significant reduction in parasite load at day 7 post infection in the group that received CD8+ T cells from T57 (Fig. 4D). Further experiments will show whether all five TN lines are equally capable of controlling T. gondii, and help establish the number of specific cells needed, as well as the cell type (naive, effector, or memory T cell) most effective at protection.

Transgenic mouse models have long been used to study various aspects of the immune system. Their generation involves long-term culture and repeated stimulation of T cells with antigen, isolation of the TCR α- and β-chains as cDNA or genomic fragments under the control of a non-endogenous promoter, and integration of the TCR into the mouse genome at non-homologous sites (2426). This inevitably leads to variation in expression levels, kinetics, and development even in mice expressing the same TCR (27). Further studies of suitable TCR transgenic lines are governed mostly by random selection of a “best responder”. To show that somatic cells can be reprogrammed, a mouse line had been generated from a randomly chosen T cell (10). This mouse showed skewed T cell development, with a strong increase in the CD4–CD8 DN population (45% in LN3 compared to 5% in wildtype), attributed to aberrant expression of the α-chain (11). Besides a relative shift in the DN1–4 stages towards the DN4 phase, we did not observe an increase in the CD4–CD8 DN population in the TN mice reported here. TN mice have no additional experimentally introduced genetic modifications. Consequently, the differences observed amongst TN lines must be due to position effects within the rearranged TCR locus, or derive from the intrinsic properties of the expressed TCR. A comparison of different TN mouse lines might therefore allow a detailed dissection of these properties without the confounding effects of transgenic artifacts.

The time-consuming generation of transgenic mouse models has lead to the widespread use of a limited number of surrogate antigens, such as ovalbumin (recognized by the OT-I and OT-II transgenic mice) to study the immunobiology of infectious disease. Pathogens engineered to produce fragments of ovalbumin, and the immune reaction against it, are unlikely to capture all essential aspects of the physiological response. As an example, we show that T57 TN CD8+ T cells proliferate upon infection with T. gondii and significantly reduce the parasite-burden, but provide limited protection against an acute lethal challenge with T. gondii. Are responses against all epitopes equally protective? What is the best cell type to provide protection? Do responses against some epitopes protect from Toxoplasma-induced encephalitis? The answers to such questions require ready access to T cells that accurately reflect the natural response against the pathogen, and TN T cells arguably meet that requirement best. Taken together, transnuclear mice obtained by SCNT can be generated rapidly from freshly isolated specific CD8+ T cells. As long as methods for identification of antigen-specific lymphocytes can be applied, this strategy should also be applicable for CD4+ T cells and B cells. Transnuclear mice resemble a new type of mouse model, which express their TCR α- and β-chains from their endogenous loci under the control of their endogenous promoters without further genetic modification, thus avoiding genetic footprints at the site of integration, an unavoidable hallmark of transgenics.

References and Notes

1. Wong P, Pamer EG. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2003;21:29. [PubMed]
2. Amanna IJ, Slifka MK, Crotty S. Immunol. Rev. 2006;211:320. [PubMed]
3. Harrington LE, Most Rv R, Whitton JL, Ahmed R. J. Virol. 2002;76:3329. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Gredmark-Russ S, Cheung EJ, Isaacson MK, Ploegh HL, Grotenbreg GM. J. Virol. 2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Moutaftsi M, et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24:817. [PubMed]
6. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2001;58:376. [PubMed]
7. Kishigami S, et al. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;340:183. [PubMed]
8. Eggan K, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2001;98:6209. [PubMed]
9. Inoue K, et al. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:1114. [PubMed]
10. Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R. Nature. 2002;415:1035. [PubMed]
11. Serwold T, Hochedlinger K, Inlay MA, Jaenisch R, Weissman IL. J. Immunol. 2007;179:928. [PubMed]
12. Koralov SB, Novobrantseva TI, Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R, Rajewsky K. J. Exp. Med. 2005;201:341. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Suzuki Y, Remington JS. J. Immunol. 1990;144:1954. [PubMed]
14. Dzierszinski FS, Hunter CA. Parasite Immunol. 2008;30:235. [PubMed]
15. Frickel EM, et al. J. Infect. Dis. 2008
16. Wilson DC, et al. PLOS Pathogen. In Press.
17. Blanchard N, et al. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:937. [PubMed]
18. Kishigami S, et al. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:165. [PubMed]
19. Hogquist KA, et al. Cell. 1994;76:17. [PubMed]
20. Kranz DM, Sherman DH, Sitkovsky MV, Pasternack MS, Eisen HN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 1984;81:573. [PubMed]
21. Sha WC, et al. Nature. 1988;336:73. [PubMed]
22. Chen J, Eisen HN, Kranz DM. Microbes Infect. 2003;5:233. [PubMed]
23. Wang XL, Altman JD. J. Immunol. Methods. 2003;280:25. [PubMed]
24. Kouskoff V, Signorelli K, Benoist C, Mathis D. J. Immunol. Methods. 1995;180:273. [PubMed]
25. Pircher H, Burki K, Lang R, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. Nature. 1989;342:559. [PubMed]
26. Mamalaki C, et al. Dev Immunol. 1993;3:159. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Barnden MJ, Allison J, Heath WR, Carbone FR. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1998;76:34. [PubMed]
28. Acknowledgements: The authors are thankful to H. Eisen, M.J. Gubbels, K. van Grinsven, E. Guillen, A. Drake, V. Mahajan, Q. Gao, and G. Yap for fruitful discussions and reagents. We are thankful to J. Dausman, R. Flannery, and J. Jackson for assistance with the management of the mouse colony. We are thankful to P. Wisniewski for FACSorting. We are thankful to J. Saeij and K. Jensen for the Pru PA7 and assistance with the in vivo imaging. EMF was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program. RJ was supported by National Institute of Health grants RO1-HD045022 and R37-CA084198. HLP was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health. A patent application has been filed. The sequences have been submitted to the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database, accession number FN601337-FN601346.