|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Differences in the substrate specificity of mammalian family X DNA polymerases are proposed to partly depend on a loop (loop 1) upstream of the polymerase active site. To examine if this is the case in DNA polymerase λ (pol λ), here we characterize a variant of the human polymerase in which nine residues of loop 1 are replaced with four residues from the equivalent position in pol β. Crystal structures of the mutant enzyme bound to gapped DNA with and without a correct dNTP reveal that the change in loop 1 does not affect the overall structure of the protein. Consistent with these structural data, the mutant enzyme has relatively normal catalytic efficiency for correct incorporation, and it efficiently participates in non-homologous end joining of double-strand DNA breaks. However, DNA junctions recovered from end-joining reactions are more diverse than normal, and the mutant enzyme is substantially less accurate than wild-type pol λ in three different biochemical assays. Comparisons of the binary and ternary complex crystal structures of mutant and wild-type pol λ suggest that loop 1 modulates pol λ’s fidelity by controlling dNTP-induced movements of the template strand and the primer-terminal 3′-OH as the enzyme transitions from an inactive to an active conformation.
Family X polymerases are small, single-subunit enzymes devoid of 3′- to 5′-exonuclease activity that fill short gaps during DNA repair. Mammalian cells contain four family X polymerases, pol β, pol λ, pol µ and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). Pols β and λ are involved in base excision repair (BER) (1–5), whereas TdT, pol µ and pol λ contribute to repairing double-strand DNA breaks via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) (6,7). TdT is a template-independent polymerase that randomly adds nucleotides to the ends of broken DNA to generate N-regions during V(D)J recombination (8–10). Pol µ can also perform limited template-independent synthesis that contributes to junctional diversity during V(D)J recombination occurring at different developmental stages (11,12). In addition, pol µ is unique among family X members in having the ability to fill short gaps by template-dependent extension of primers that lack their template strand partner (13,14). Pol λ is a template-dependent polymerase that is also implicated in V(D)J recombination (15). Moreover, pol µ and pol λ, but not TdT, are implicated in general NHEJ of DNA damage-induced double-strand breaks that can have variety of different end configurations (16,17).
Given their important but somewhat diverse biological functions, it is of interest to understand the determinants of the substrate specificities of the four mammalian family X polymerases. X-ray crystal structures reveal that all four enzymes share a similar structure overall, yet each enzyme individually has small but important structural features that are likely to be relevant to their different substrate specificities (18). One such structural element is loop 1. Loop 1 was first described in TdT, where it lies between β sheets 3 and 4 of the palm subdomain. In the TdT structure, loop 1 is in a position proposed to preclude binding of the template strand, thereby limiting TdT to template-independent synthesis (19,20). In pol µ, which is a template-dependent polymerase that nonetheless can conduct limited template-independent synthesis, loop 1 is similar in length to loop 1 in TdT. Thus, when pol µ is conducting template-independent synthesis, loop 1 may play a similar function as in TdT. Consistent with this idea, pol µ that lacks loop 1 has strongly reduced ability to catalyze template-independent synthesis and template-dependent extension of a primer terminus lacking its template partner, yet it retains the ability to perform more classical, short gap-filling synthesis either alone or with its partners in NHEJ (13,21). Thus loop 1 in pol µ is an important determinant of substrate specificity.
In this study, we extend previous efforts to examine the function of loop 1 in pol µ (13,21) and TdT (20) to the analogous loop 1 in pol λ. As dNTP binding induces pol λ to transition from an inactive to an active conformation, β sheets β3 and β4 partially unravel to form loop 1, a nine-residue loop that repositions as the DNA template strand assumes its active conformation. Motivated by the fact that shortening loop 1 in pol µ was informative regarding its substrate specificity in NHEJ, here we decided to take the same approach with pol λ, by characterizing a pol λ derivative whose loop 1 was shorter than normal. In deciding how to shorten loop 1, we took advantage of the fact that in its family X sibling, pol β, strands β3 and β4 are shorter than in pol λ and their conformation does not change during catalytic cycling. Moreover, not only are the nine residues of loop 1 conserved in pol λ from different organisms (Figure 1A), but certain amino acids in this region of pol λ align with those in pol β (Figure 1B), and in a manner that suggests that five residues in pol λ might be deleted without inducing major structural changes. The goal in studying this variant enzyme is to better understand the nature of the catalytic cycle for template-dependent DNA synthesis by pol λ, both mechanistically, and also in the context of its biological role in NHEJ. Toward these goals, we compare several biochemical properties of the mutant enzyme to those of wild-type (wt) pol λ, when operating alone and when participating in the more complex NHEJ reaction. We solve binary and ternary complex crystal structures of the mutant enzyme, and compare them with each other and to their wt counterparts. The results demonstrate that loop 1 is not essential for catalytic activity, but it is important for the fidelity of DNA synthesis and the accuracy of NHEJ. We present a model for involvement of loop 1 in modulating fidelity by controlling the position of the template strand and the 3′-O of the primer terminal nucleotide, as pol λ cycles from an inactive to an active conformation.
The human full-length wt pol λ, full-length pol λ with deletion of loop1 (designated pol λ DL) and its 39-kDa domain were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as described (22). Oligonucleotides were from Oligos Etc. (Wilsonville, OR, USA) and radioactive nucleotides were from Perkin Elmer (Boston, MA, USA).
Reaction mixtures (40 µl) contained 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM dithiothreitol, 4% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) and either 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1µg of activated DNA (Amersham Biosciences Corp. Piscataway, NJ, USA), 50 µM dNTPs, 5 µCi of α 32P dCTP and 50 nM full-length wt pol λ or pol λ DL or 0.5 mM MnCl2, 0.75 µg of pol(dA)/olido(dT) (Amersham Biosciences Corp.), 10 µM dTTP, 5 µCi of α 32P dTTP and 10 nM wt pol λ or pol λ DL. Reactions were incubated in 37°C, and two 5 µl aliquots were removed after 5, 10, and 15 min of incubation and mixed with 45 µl of 16 mM EDTA, followed by precipitation of the synthesized DNA with 0.5 ml of ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 15 min on ice. The precipitated DNA was collected by vacuum filtration through Whatman GF/C glass fiber filters and the amount of radioactivity bound to the filter was measured in a Beckman Coulter LS 6500 Scintillation Counter.
Measurements were performed with T5g, 36-mer oligonucleotide, 5′-CTCCGTCGTCCGGCACGTAATACTGCTCAGTCGTAC, as template primed at a 1.2:1 molar ratio with 5′ 32P-labeled P17 primer: 5′-GTACGACTGAGCAGTAT. Reaction mixtures (20 µl) contained 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg of BSA, 4% glycerol and 50 µM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP, 200 nM DNA and 10, 50, and 150 nM wt or pol λ DL. The reactions were incubated in 37°C. Aliquots (10 µl) were removed at 10 and 20 min and mixed with equal volume of 99% formamide, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% xylene cyanol and 0.1% bromophenol blue. DNA products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gels.
DNA substrates were prepared by hybridizing a 32P-5′-end-labeled 18-nt primer (P18, 5′-AGCAGGGTAGCCCACTGC) and a 17-nt downstream primer (DP17, 5′-GTGGACGTTCGGTGGAG) with a phosphate on the 5′-end to a 32-mer template (TT36, 5′-CTCCACCGAACGTCCACTGCAGTGGGCTACCCTGCT) to create a 1-nt gap substrate. Reaction mixtures (10 µl) contained 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 4% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 nM DNA and 4 nM full-length wt pol λ or pol λ DL. Reactions were initiated by adding dATP at one of nine concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 µM) and incubated at 37°C for 3 min. To measure misincorporation, reaction mixtures contained 50 or 100 nM wt pol λ or 5 or 7 nM pol λ DL. Reactions were initiated by adding dGTP at one of eight concentrations (1, 2, 5,10, 25, 50, 100 or 150 µM to reactions with wt pol λ or 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 150 or 200 µM to reactions with pol λ DL) and incubated at 37°C for 6 min. After adding an equal volume of 99% formamide, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% xylene cyanol and 0.1% bromophenol blue, products were resolved on a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and quantified by phosphor screen autoradiography. The data were fit to the Michaelis–Menten equation using non-linear regression.
Measurements were performed with the same DNA substrate as used in the primer extension reactions. Reactions (20 µl) contained 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg of BSA, 4% glycerol and 50 µM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP, 200 nM DNA and 2 nM wt pol λ or pol λ DL. The reactions were incubated in 37°C. Aliquots (5 µl) were removed at 3, 6 and 9 min and mixed with 5 µl 99% formamide, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% xylene cyanol and 0.1% bromophenol blue. DNA products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Product bands were quantified by phosphorimagry, and the probability of terminating processive synthesis at any given site was expressed as the ratio of the amount of product at that site to the amount of product at that site plus all longer length products (23).
To generate internally labeled plasmid substrates, plasmid pRZ56 was linearized with MluI and then 10- and 11-base 5′-overhangs were formed by controlled 3′-resection with T4 DNA polymerase in the presence of dTTP (24). Construction of a vector containing a site-specific DNA double-strand break with 3′-phosphoglycolate termini and analysis of the products of end joining in CV-1 cells (24). An unlabeled 13-mer (5′pGCCGGACGCGACG) and a 5′-end-labeled 14-mer (5′*pCGAGGAACGCGACG) were ligated into the 10- and 11-base overhangs, respectively, and the plasmid was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and electroeluted (25). End-joining reactions contained 3.2 mg/ml extract (Promega in vitro transcription grade), 50 mM triethanolamine-NaOH (pH 7.5), 1 mM Mg(OAc)2, 40 mM KOAc, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM ATP, 50 µM of each dNTP, 50 µg/ml BSA, 1 µg/ml substrate and 5 µg/ml XRCC4/DNA ligase IV complex (Trevigen). In some cases, extracts were immnuodepleted with antibodies against pol λ (gift of Luis Blanco), as described (17). Following incubation for 6 h at 37°C, DNA was deproteinized, cut with BstXI and AvaI, and analyzed by denaturing gel electrophoresis and phosphorimagry (17). Aliquots of some reactions were transfected into DH5α bacteria, clones were isolated and the plasmid repair joints sequenced.
This assay score errors generated in the LacZ α-complementation gene in M13mp2 during synthesis to fill a 407-nt gap. Reaction mixtures (25 µl) contained 2 nM M13mp2 gapped DNA substrate, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg of BSA, 4% glycerol and 50 µM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP. Polymerization reactions were initiated by adding full-length wt (300 nM) or DL (50 nM or 150 nM) pol λ, and were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and terminated by adding EDTA to 15 mM. Reaction products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis as described (26). Correct synthesis produces M13mp2 DNA that yields dark blue phage plaques upon introduction into an E. coli α-complementation strain and plating on indicator plates. Errors are scored as light blue or colorless mutant phage plaques. DNA from independent mutant clones was sequenced to define the lacZ mutation. Since most of the mutant clones generated by pol λ contained both phenotypically detectable and silent changes, the error rates are described as the number of observed mutations divided by the number of nucleotides sequenced.
Crystals of the 39-kDa pol λ DL in complex with oligos T11 (5′-CGGCAGTACTG), PB (5′-CAGTAC) and DT (5′-GCCG) for a binary complex or oligos T11T (5′-CGGCAATACTG), PT (5′-CAGTA), DT and ddTTP for a ternary complex were grown using the hanging drop method. The protein/DNA solution contained 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2. Binary complex crystals grew in 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 6.5, 12% 2-propanol, 100 mM ammonium acetate and 15 mM magnesium acetate. Ternary complex crystals grew in 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 5.5, 21% 2-propanol and 200 mM sodium citrate. Crystals were transferred in four steps to a solution containing 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 6.5, 12% 2-propanol, 100 mM ammonium acetate, 15 mM magnesium acetate, 100 mM NaCl and 25% ethylene glycol (binary complex crystals) or 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 5.5, 21% 2-propanol, 10 mM magnesium chloride, 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM sodium citrate and 25% ethylene glycol (ternary complex crystals) and flash cooled. Data collection for both structures were performed at −178°C on a Saturn92 CCD area detector mounted on a MicroMax-007HF (Rigaku Corporation) rotating anode generator equipped with Varimax HF mirrors. All data were processed using the HKL2000 data processing software (27). The structures were solved by molecular replacement using ternary or binary structures of pol λ wt (PDB codes 1XSN and 1SXL, respectively) as search models and using MOLREP (28). Refinement was carried out using CNS (29) and phenix (30), and model building with O (31) and Coot (32). The quality of the model was assessed using Molprobity (33) and found to have good stereochemistry (Table 5).
The nine amino acids of loop 1 in human pol λ (463-SQEENGQQQ-471) were replaced with the four-residue turn between β3 and β4 in human pol β (Figure 1B). The resulting polymerase (pol λ DL) was expressed in E. coli and purified as described (34), in two different forms. One was the full-length protein containing the BRCT domain that is required for use in the NHEJ reactions (35). The other form was the 39-kDa protein that lacks the BRCT domain but contains both the polymerase and 8-kDa dRP lyase domains. This protein was used for crystallography.
The catalytic activity of pol λ DL was first measured using activated calf thymus DNA as a generic primer-template. The specific activity of pol λ DL was 3-fold higher than that of wt pol λ (1800 versus 560 pmol/nmol/min). Because manganese has been suggested to be the physiologically relevant metal for pol λ (36), we also measured the specific activity of the mutant enzyme in the presence of manganese as the activator. We performed this measurement as described by Blanca et al. (36), using poly(dA)/oligo(dT) as the DNA substrate. The specific activity of pol λ DL was 4-fold higher than that of the wt pol λ (2800 versus 700 pmol/nmol/min). Next, equivalent amounts (10 nM) of the two enzymes were compared for the ability to extend a primer hybridized to an oligonucleotide template (Figure 2A). Pol λ DL (Lane 4) reproducibly extended more primers and generated longer products than did wt pol λ (Lane 1). A 15-fold higher concentration of wt pol λ (Lane 3) was required to extend most of the original primer and to obtain a DNA product ladder similar to that observed with pol λ DL (Lane 4).
The experiment in Figure 2A was performed under conditions that allow primers to be extended multiple times. To measure the processivity of a single cycle of synthesis, we decreased the ratio of enzyme to DNA substrate to ensure that each primer was extended only once. Under these conditions, as expected based on an earlier study (37), wt pol λ is largely distributive (Figure 2B, Lanes 1–3), terminating synthesis after each incorporation with ~90% probability. However, pol λ DL is more processive, as illustrated by the ability to generate somewhat longer product chains (Figure 2B) and by lower termination probabilities following each of five incorporation events (~60%).
Next, we determined steady-state parameters for single nucleotide incorporation into a 1-nt gap. For correct incorporation of dATP opposite template T, the apparent Km and kcat of pol λ DL differed by <2-fold from the values for wt pol λ (Table 1), such that the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the two enzymes differed by only 3-fold.
To determine if the deletion of loop 1 in pol λ affects its performance in NHEJ, we examined repair of a defined, site-specifically labeled double-strand break substrate bearing partially complementary overhangs. Repair was performed in nuclear extracts made from HeLa cells, which as described previously (17), were immunodepleted of pol λ and then supplemented with either wt pol λ or pol λ DL. Repair of this substrate proceeds predominantly by annealing of the terminal CG dinucleotides in the 3′-overhangs (Figure 3A), followed by single-base gap filling that is dependent on pol λ, Ku and XRCC4/DNA ligase IV, and finally ligation, resulting in 43-base (head-to-tail) and 24-base (head-to-head) products following AvaI/BstXI cleavage. Pol λ DL (Lane 6 in Figure 3A, bottom panel) was as effective as wt pol λ (Lane 4) in generating the diagnostic 43- and 24-mers. In addition, however, pol λ DL also generated substantial amounts of products that were 1-nt shorter (42- and 23-mer in Lane 6).
These shorter products could arise by resection of one 3′-overhang to a blunt end, followed by 3-nt gap filling using the blunt end as primer and 3′-overhang on the opposite end of the break as template (Figure 3A, top panel). However, because these substrates were constructed by ligating 13- or 14-mer onto 10- or 11-base 5′-overhangs, there will always be some residual 5′-overhangs. Thus, the blunt end from which the putative synthesis on the 3′-overhang template is primed could also result from fill-in of such a 5′-overhang during end joining. To determine the relative efficiencies of pol λ and pol λ DL in catalyzing such fill-in reactions, a substrate was constructed with an oligomer ligated onto only one end of the plasmid, i.e. having a 3-base 3′-overhang at one end and a 10-base 5′-overhang at the other (Figure 3B). When this substrate was incubated in pol λ-supplemented extracts, a prominent 24-base head-to-head product was generated, as expected. However, in comparison to the predominant 43-base head-to-tail product that was generated from the substrate with two 3′-overhangs (Figure 3A), this new substrate yielded a broader distribution of less prominent products ranging from about 33 to 42 bases (bracketed bands in Lane 4 of Figure 3B, bottom panel). The 42-base product is consistent with continuous polymerization across both the 5′- and 3′-overhangs, while the shorter products may reflect varying degrees of trimming of the two overhangs prior to ligation.
Interestingly, the 42-base product was more prominent in the pol λ-depleted extracts that were supplemented with pol λ DL (Lane 6 in Figure 3B, bottom panel). This result suggests that pol λ DL is more efficient than the wt enzyme in filling in long gaps on aligned double strand break (DSB) ends, consistent with its intrinsically greater polymerization activity (Figure 2A) and processivity (Figure 2B) on simple primer-templates. As expected, a chimera consisting of pol λ with the catalytic domain of pol β (37) did not support any end joining of this substrate (Figure 3A and B). Extracts supplemented with pol µ yielded only the 24-base head-to-head product and no head-to-tail products at all, consistent with previous results indicating that it can efficiently fill only single nucleotide gaps on aligned DSB ends (17,38). Importantly, the pol λ DL yielded a broad smear of products surrounding the 42-mer (Figure 3B, Lane 6), consistent with errors made during gap filling. To test this possibility, we examined the sequences of gap filling products in more detail. DNA from pol λ DL-supplemented end-joining reactions was transfected into E. coli and 25 individual clones were sequenced (Figure 4). These sequences confirmed the broad heterogeneity of products. Some retained the 5′- and 3′-overhangs, while others contained deletions (of one or several nucleotides) and base substitutions. Four clones contained mixed sequences consistent with ligation of heteroduplexes generated by error-prone gap filling. These results suggest that gap filling by pol λ DL on aligned DSB ends during NHEJ in a HeLa cell nuclear extract is less accurate than is gap filling by wt pol λ. Consistent with these results is the observation that primer extension by pol λ DL generated additional bands (indicated by arrowheads in Figure 2A, Lane 4), likely products of incorrect incorporation, that were not observed among the reaction products of wt pol λ (Figure 2A, Lane 3).
The heterogeneity of the products of the primer extension reactions (Figure 2A, Lane 4) and the NHEJ reactions (Figure 4) prompted further examination of the fidelity of DNA synthesis by pol λ DL. For this purpose, we used an assay that detects a broad range of different errors at a large number of sites as a polymerase copies a template encoding the LacZ α-complementation gene in gapped M13mp2 DNA (26). Both wt pol λ and pol λ DL completely filled the gap (data not shown). The DNA products were then introduced into E. coli cells, the cells were plated on indicator plates and the total number of dark blue M13 plaques (from correct synthesis) and light blue and/or colorless M13 plaques (containing DNA synthesis errors) were scored. Wild-type pol λ and pol λ DL generated mutants at frequencies of 21% and 54%, respectively (Table 2). A comparison of the DNA sequences of independent LacZ mutants revealed that, like wt pol λ, pol λ DL generated a variety of errors (Table 3) that were distributed throughout the LacZ sequence (data not shown). Amazingly, a total of 618 sequence changes were identified among only 50 LacZ mutants generated by pol λ DL, i.e. an average of 12 changes per mutant. This compares to 2.5 mutations per mutant generated by wt pol λ (39). When the sequence changes are used to calculate error rates for individual classes of events (see ‘Materials and Methods’ section), the results indicate that pol λ DL is 2- to 3-fold less accurate than wt pol λ for single-base insertion and single- and 2-base deletion errors (Table 2). Analysis of the specificity of single nucleotide deletions revealed that the largest rate increase is for deletions at non-iterated template sequences (6.6-fold, Table 3). Based on extensive previous data [reviewed in (40)], this specificity suggests that the majority of these single nucleotide deletions may have been initiated by nucleotide misinsertion followed by primer relocation to generate a deletion intermediate with an unpaired template nucleotide and a correct terminal base pair that facilitates extension. Pol λ DL also generates more complex, closely spaced substitution, substitution-deletion and substitution-addition errors at an increased frequency compared with wt pol λ (last line in Table 2). Finally and perhaps most tellingly, the largest effect of changing loop 1 in pol λ is the increase in the rates of single-base substitutions, by 13-fold overall, and by 7- to 31-fold for different base substitutions (Table 4). To confirm that the observed elevated substitution error rates of pol λ DL are independent of the nature of the DNA substrate (long versus short gap), we also measured single nucleotide misinsertion into a 1-nt gap DNA. For misinsertion of dGTP opposite template T, the catalytic efficiency of pol λ DL was 12-fold higher than that of wt pol λ, an increase that was due to a 46-fold higher kcat (Table 1). Collectively, these data demonstrate that deletion of loop 1 strongly increases the ability of pol λ to misincorporate nucleotides during DNA synthesis.
With the goal of understanding why the deletion of a loop positioned between the second and third template nucleotides upstream of the active site results in normal catalytic efficiency for correct incorporation, but reduces fidelity, we determined two crystal structures of pol λ DL. One was a ternary complex of pol λ DL bound to a 1-nt gapped DNA substrate and an incoming correct ddTTP (2.6 Å resolution; see ‘Materials and Methods’ section and Table 5). The single nucleotide gap substrate used here may be most relevant to pol λ’s role in BER. The substrates encountered by the enzyme during NHEJ may be more complex. The ternary complex structure is remarkably similar to that of the equivalent wt pol λ ternary complex (PDBID 1XSN; root mean square deviation (RMSD) 0.615 Å for 270 Cα atoms; Figure 5A and B), of course, with the exception of the loop 1 region. While β-strands 3 and 4 adopt a conformation similar to that observed in pol λ wt (22), the loop that connects them in the wt polymerase is absent (magenta in Figure 5A). This occurs without any structural perturbation of the DNA or any of the polymerase active site atoms, including the dNTP-binding Mg2+ ion observed in the wt structure. This is consistent with the nearly normal catalytic efficiency of pol λ DL.
The catalytic cycle for correct incorporation by pol λ involves dNTP-induced repositioning of the DNA template strand, and changes in the positions of several amino acids that result in assembly of the polymerase active site (21). These changes are also believed to play an important role in ensuring the fidelity of synthesis (41). For these reasons, we attempted to understand why pol λ DL has reduced fidelity by solving a second structure, in this case a binary complex of pol λ DL bound to a 1-nt gapped DNA substrate but without a dNTP present (2.4 Å resolution; see Table 5). When the wt (1XSL) and pol λ DL mutant binary complex structures were overlaid (Figure 6A), there was good overall agreement between the two (RMSD 0.814 Å for 267 Cα atoms). Strikingly however, starting at the −1 nt in the template strand, and even more significantly for nucleotides −2 to −6, the template strand of pol λ DL upstream of the active site (green in Figure 6A) adopts a novel conformation that is intermediate between those observed in the wt ternary complex (magenta) and the wt binary complex (blue). In wt pol λ, the location of loop 1 in a binary complex prevents the template strand from assuming a catalytically competent position. Loop 1 and β strands 3 and 4 need to relocate to allow the template strand to occupy the position observed in the ternary complex (Figure 6A). In pol λ DL, the absence of loop 1, and perhaps more specifically the absence of N467 that is in loop 1 (Figure 6B), appears to allow the template to migrate toward the active conformation even in the absence of an incoming dNTP (Figure 6A and B). In addition, a comparison of the binary complexes of wt pol λ and pol λ DL reveals changes in K472 (Figure 6C) that could possibly be functionally significant. Based on the wt pol λ binary complex structure (1XSL, 34), K472 may contribute to maintaining an inactive conformation of the enzyme in the absence of a dNTP by forming a hydrogen bond with the 3′-O of the 3′ nucleotide of the primer (the distance between the NZ of K472 and the 3′-O is 2.8 Å). This may be less likely in pol λ DL because in the binary complex the NZ of K472 is 3.6 Å from the 3′-O, it is pointing away from the 3′-O and it is hydrogen bonding to a water molecule.
The focus of this study, on the importance of loop 1 on pol λ’s substrate specificity, largely derives from previous studies indicating that loop 1 in the palm subdomain of TdT and pol µ is an important determinant of DNA substrate specificity during NHEJ of double-strand breaks in DNA. Loop 1 in TdT is long (20 residues) and has been suggested to preclude binding of the template strand and thereby contribute to its template-independent polymerization activity (19,20). Pol µ also contains a long loop 1, deletion of which abrogates its ability to catalyze template-independent synthesis as well as template-dependent extension of a primer terminus lacking its template partner during a reconstituted NHEJ reaction (13). Nonetheless, pol µ lacking loop 1 still retains the ability to perform more standard template-dependent gap-filling synthesis (e.g. when the primer is paired with its complementary template base), either alone or with its partners in NHEJ (13,21). Thus, loop 1 is not required for all template-dependent synthesis activity by pol µ, but it is an important determinant of the substrate specificity of pol µ. The present study leads to a similar general interpretation on the role of loop 1 in human pol λ, namely that loop 1 is not required for template-dependent synthesis, but it does have an important role in defining substrate specificity. Thus, wt pol λ and its loop 1 deletion derivative have similar kinetic constants for correct dNTP insertion (Table 1), similar specific activity with activated DNA, similar ability to extend a simple primer-template (Figure 2), and similar abilities to participate in NHEJ (Figure 3). If anything, the loop 1 deletion derivative performs slightly better than wt pol λ in the latter three assays. This may partly be a consequence of its slightly higher processivity (Figure 2B), a property suggesting that loop 1 may modulate movement of the template strand during catalytic cycling (see below), thus affecting translocation. However, in a manner generally akin to loop 1 in pol µ, loop 1 in pol λ also appears to have an important role in determining substrate specificity. This is because the loop 1 deletion enzyme is considerably less accurate than wt pol λ, as evidenced by the increased diversity of DNA products generated during NHEJ (Figures 3 and and4),4), by the increased rate of misinsertion of dGTP opposite template T (Table 1), and by the increased error rates for a variety of errors (Tables 3), especially all 12-single base–base mismatches (Table 4). The rate at which pol λ DL stably incorporates certain of these single base–base mismatches into duplex DNA approaches 1%. This rate is similar to the rate at which wt pol λ generates certain single-base deletions (39), an observation that motivated successful efforts to obtain crystal structures of pol λ bound in a catalytically competent conformation to misaligned template-primers (42). Thus, the high error rates in Table 4 suggest that it might be possible to obtain crystal structures of ternary complexes of pol λ DL protein containing mismatches in the nascent base pair binding pocket and/or at the primer terminus.
A previous study (43) showed that, when bound to Bacillus stearothermophilus DNA polymerase I large fragment (family A), the 12 single base–base mismatches are structurally diverse. It is therefore somewhat surprising that pol λ DL has increased error rates for all 12-single base–base mismatches (Table 4), which indicates that pol λ DL can accommodate, and relatively efficiently extend from, all 12 mispairs. Furthermore, the fact that modulation of base substitution fidelity by pol λ DL is not mispair specific is consistent with the idea that truncation of loop 1 likely does not alter the shape of the nascent base pair binding pocket [as, for example, is the case with mutator pol β R283K (44) or R517K pol λ (Bebenek,K., Garcia-Diaz,M. and Kunkel,T.A., unpublished data)]. Instead removal of loop 1 may allow the enzyme to more readily achieve the active conformation under less than ideal conditions, thus increasing a chance of misincorporation.
Clues to how the loop 1 deletion results in such a general loss of discrimination come from considering loop 1 interactions during the pol λ catalytic cycle. In a binary complex of wt pol λ bound to a gapped primer-template (1XSL), prior to binding of a correct dNTP (22), β3, β4 and the hairpin are stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds. These include interactions between two residues of the hairpin: N467 and Q470 and H530 (2.6 Å) and E498 (2.9 Å), respectively. In addition β3, which is positioned parallel to the template strand, makes van der Waals contacts with the backbone of the template upstream of the primer terminal base pair. Upon dNTP binding, however, the switch from an inactive to active conformation involves partial unraveling of the β strands and displacement of the loop to permit the template strand to adopt its catalytic conformation. It is tempting to speculate that this loop is part of a system of checks and balances that controls insertion fidelity. The energetic penalty of relocating the loop would serve to preserve an inactive conformation, and would be generally only overcome upon binding of a correct nucleotide. Thus, the loop deletion, by lowering the energetic penalty of adopting an active conformation, eliminates one of the checks and facilitates the adoption of an active conformation, thus reducing the discrimination between correct/incorrect insertions. This would explain the general increase in base substitution mutagenesis, and would constitute a clear example of how actions ‘at a distance’ (i.e. modifications distant from the active site that influence active site function) can affect the fidelity of a polymerase.
The differences observed for K472 between the binary complexes of wt pol λ and pol λ DL described in ‘Results’ section are consistent with the possibility that K472 may be involved in modulating the activity and the fidelity of DNA synthesis by pol λ. K472 is conserved in family X polymerases (Figure 1), as a lysine in TdT and pol β, and as an arginine in pol µ (Arg387). Recently Andrade et al. (45) reported that substituting Arg387 with Ala resulted in a loss of template-independent synthesis, whereas a change to Lys increased this activity. Thus, Arg387 plays a key role in modulating template-independent synthesis by pol µ. Substituting the homologous lysine in TdT with arginine or alanine (20) also results in loss of template-independent activity, although the properties of the two TdT mutants are not identical. These results and the structures of TdT and pol µ led Andrade et al. (45) to propose that Arg387 stabilizes the position of the primer terminus and, through its interaction with the primer strand, controls the repositioning of the primer terminus upon dNTP incorporation to allow binding and incorporation of the subsequent dNTP during template-independent synthesis. According to their model, the repositioning of the primer is rate limiting for template-independent synthesis. Substituting Arg387 with Lys may allow the primer terminus to more readily adopt the catalytically active conformation. Our results suggest that K472 may help to modulate template-dependent synthesis. In the wt pol λ binary complex (1XSL), K472 is within H-bonding distance of the 3′-O of the primer terminal nucleotide. A hydrogen bond between K472 and the primer terminus that could stabilize the inactive conformation would need to be disrupted in order for the 3′-O to assume its catalytically competent position. A weakened interaction between K472 and the primer terminus, as might be the case in pol λ DL, would allow the 3′-O to more easily adopt a conformation that would support catalysis with an incorrect nucleotide bound, reducing the discrimination between correct and incorrect incorporation, as observed. Finally, the possible role of K472 is consistent with a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical study of the catalytical mechanism of pol λ, indicating this lysine as one of the residues important for catalysis (46).
Division of Intramural Research of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Project Z01 ES065070 to T.A.K, in parts); National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (CA40615 to L.F.P., in parts). Funding for open access charge: Division of Intramural Research of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Project (Z01 ES065070 to T.A.K.).
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
We thank Dr Bill Beard and Dr Michael Murray for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, and the NIEHS DNA Sequencing Facility for assistance in sequencing the M13mp2 LacZ α mutants.