PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jvirolPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJV ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
 
J Virol. 2010 September; 84(18): 9632–9636.
Published online 2010 June 30. doi:  10.1128/JVI.00451-10
PMCID: PMC2937657

Prophylactic Treatment with a G Glycoprotein Monoclonal Antibody Reduces Pulmonary Inflammation in Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-Challenged Naïve and Formalin-Inactivated RSV-Immunized BALB/c Mice [down-pointing small open triangle]

Abstract

We examined whether prophylactically administered anti-respiratory syncytial virus (anti-RSV) G monoclonal antibody (MAb) would decrease the pulmonary inflammation associated with primary RSV infection and formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV)-enhanced disease in mice. MAb 131-2G administration 1 day prior to primary infection reduced the pulmonary inflammatory response and the level of RSV replication. Further, intact or F(ab′)2 forms of MAb 131-2G administered 1 day prior to infection in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice reduced enhanced inflammation and disease. This study shows that an anti-RSV G protein MAb might provide prophylaxis against both primary infection and FI-RSV-associated enhanced disease. It is possible that antibodies with similar reactivities might prevent enhanced disease and improve the safety of nonlive virus vaccines.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants and young children causes substantial bronchiolitis and pneumonia (11, 27, 28, 40) resulting in 40,000 to 125,000 hospitalizations in the United States each year (27). RSV is also a prominent cause of respiratory illness in older children; those of any age with compromised cardiac, pulmonary, or immune systems; and the elderly (6, 7, 11, 17, 18, 39). Despite extensive efforts toward vaccine development (3, 5, 8, 20, 30, 38), none is yet available. Currently, only preventive measures are available that focus on infection control to decrease transmission and prophylactic administration of a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against the F protein of RSV (palivizumab) that is recommended for high-risk infants and young children (4, 7, 17). To date, no treatment has been highly effective for active RSV infection (17, 21).

The first candidate vaccine, a formalin-inactivated RSV (FI-RSV) vaccine developed in the 1960s, not only failed to protect against disease but led to severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection in young vaccine recipients upon subsequent natural infection (8, 16). The experience with FI-RSV has limited nonlive RSV vaccine development for the RSV-naïve infant and young child. Understanding the factors contributing to disease pathogenesis and FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease may identify ways to prevent such a response and to help achieve a safe and effective vaccine.

The RSV G, or attachment, protein has been implicated in the pathogenesis of disease after primary infection and FI-RSV-enhanced disease (2, 26, 31). The central conserved region of the G protein contains four evolutionarily conserved cysteines in a cysteine noose structure, within which lies a CX3C chemokine motif (9, 29, 34). The G protein CX3C motif is also immunoactive, as suggested by studies with the mouse model that show that G protein CX3C motif interaction with CX3CR1 alters pulmonary inflammation (41), RSV-specific T-cell responses (12), FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease, and expression of the neurokinin substance P (14) and also depresses respiratory rates (32). Recent studies demonstrated that therapeutic treatment with a murine anti-RSV G protein monoclonal antibody (MAb 131-2G) which blocks binding to CX3CR1 can reduce pulmonary inflammation associated with primary infection (13, 23). These findings led us to hypothesize that prophylactic administration of this anti-RSV G monoclonal antibody may also diminish pulmonary inflammation associated with RSV infection in naïve and in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice. In this study, we evaluate the impact of prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G on the pulmonary inflammatory response to primary infection and to RSV challenge following FI-RSV immunization in mice.

Prophylactic anti-RSV G MAb treatment decreases pulmonary cell infiltrates and RSV replication in naïve mice.

In accordance with institutional guidelines, 8- to 10-week-old, specific-pathogen-free, female BALB/c mice (The Jackson Laboratories) were intraperitoneally treated with 300 μg anti-RSV G MAb, 131-2G, or normal mouse Ig (Thermo Scientific) 1 day prior to intranasal challenge with 106 PFU of RSV strain A2 (35). Prophylactic treatment with MAb 131-2G resulted in an ~30% reduction in total bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cell infiltration (Fig. (Fig.11 A) compared to control antibody-treated mice. The level of pulmonary infiltration was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced at day 5 postinfection (p.i.), the time point corresponding to the peak of viral replication and pulmonary inflammation in the absence of prophylactic treatment (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A). This decrease in cell number was associated with a decrease in most cell types in the BAL fluid with marked reductions early after infection, such as at day 3 p.i., for RB6-8C5+ polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) (73% reduction), DX5+ natural killer (NK) cells (68% reduction), and CD4+ and CD8+ cells (67% and 55% reduction, respectively) as determined by flow cytometric analysis (35). Similar levels of reduction of these cell types were also observed at day 5 p.i., as were modest decreases in CD45R/B220+ cells and CD11b+ cells (data not shown). Cell-free BAL fluid supernatants were assayed for gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (eBioscience). The level of IFN-γ production in BAL fluids was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced at days 5 p.i. (64%) and 7 p.i. (71%) after the antibody prophylaxis (Fig. (Fig.1D),1D), but the already low level of IL-4 at day 5 p.i. (6.2 ± 1.8 pg/ml) or day 7 p.i. (2.0 ± 0.4 pg/ml) was not substantially affected.

FIG. 1.
Effect of MAb 131-2G prophylaxis on pulmonary leukocyte trafficking and RSV titers after primary RSV infection. (A) The mean BAL fluid cell numbers (±standard errors) in the lungs of antibody-treated (nIg or anti-G MAb) RSV-infected mice. (B) ...

Prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited RSV replication at all time points examined compared to normal Ig (nIg) control antibody treatment. Infectious virus was not detectable by an immunostaining plaque assay (15) in the lungs of mice treated prophylactically with MAb 131-2G (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B). Total RNA was extracted from homogenized lung tissue, and expression of the RSV matrix (M) gene was determined by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Transcripts of the RSV M gene were detected in both normal Ig-treated and MAb 131-2G-prophylactically treated mice through day 11 p.i., but message levels were significantly lower (P < 0.05) for the MAb 131-2G-prophylactically treated mice (Fig. 1B and C). As previously demonstrated, in the absence of detectable infectious virus, low levels of RSV RNA are detected in the lungs of infected mice by real-time RT-PCR (1, 22).

Prophylactic antibody treatment prevents FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease.

Mice were immunized with 106 PFU equivalents of formalin-inactivated RSV/A2 (FI-A2) in the superficial gluteal muscle and then rested a minimum of 4 weeks prior to RSV challenge (14). Several studies have established that pronounced weight loss, pulmonary eosinophilia, and type 2 cytokine dominance are associated with enhanced FI-RSV vaccine disease in mice (19, 24, 37). We examined these and other pulmonary inflammatory markers following prophylactic MAb treatment in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice challenged with RSV (Fig. (Fig.2).2). No infectious virus or viral RNA was detected in the lungs of mice prophylactically treated with either MAb 131-2G or normal Ig (data not shown). However, treatment with MAb 131-2G was associated with a marked decrease in weight loss (Fig. (Fig.2B)2B) and infiltration by pulmonary cells (Fig. (Fig.2A),2A), including eosinophils, i.e., <11% eosinophilia compared to normal Ig control-treated mice (23 to 42% eosinophilia) (data not shown). FI-A2- or FI-Vero-cell-immunized, mock-challenged mice had a minimal pulmonary inflammatory response that was unaffected by prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G (data not shown). Prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G F(ab′)2 was associated with a similar decrease in total BAL fluid cell infiltration (Fig. (Fig.33 A) and pulmonary eosinophilia (Fig. (Fig.3B)3B) compared to normal Ig (nIg) treatment. Overall, both intact MAb 131-2G- and MAb 131-2G F(ab′)2-treated mice had a dramatic reduction in all cell types and at all time points examined compared to nIg-treated mice (Table (Table1).1). These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that RSV G protein modifies trafficking to the lung of many cells, including CD11b+, PMN, B220+, and DX5+ NK cells (33, 35, 36). Interestingly, at days 3 and 5 p.i. MAb 131-2G F(ab′)2 was associated with a greater percent reduction for most cell types than was intact MAb 131-2G (Table (Table1).1). The similarity in results with the F(ab′)2 and intact forms of MAb 131-2G demonstrates that the MAb effect is not associated with decreased replication of RSV. MAb 131-2G F(ab′)2 does not increase viral clearance (data not shown). The levels of IL-4 in the cell-free BAL fluid were diminished as early as day 3 postchallenge and significantly reduced by days 5 and 7 postchallenge in mice treated with intact and F(ab′)2 MAb 131-2G (Fig. (Fig.3C3C).

FIG. 2.
Effect of MAb 131-2G prophylaxis on illness in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice. (A) Mean BAL cell numbers (±standard errors) in the lungs of FI-RSV-vaccinated mice treated with either nIg or MAb 131-2G. The data are representative of three independent ...
FIG. 3.
Effect of MAb 131-2G F(ab′)2 prophylaxis on illness in FI-RSV-vaccinated mice. (A) Mean BAL fluid cell numbers (±standard errors) in the lungs of nIg-, MAb 131-2G (anti-G MAb)-, or 131-2G F(ab′)2 fragment [anti-G F(ab′) ...
TABLE 1.
Pulmonary leukocyte infiltration following MAb 131-2G or 131-2G F(ab′)2 antibody treatment 1 day prior to RSV infection in FI-RSV-immunized micea

This study shows that prophylactic treatment with an anti-RSV G protein monoclonal antibody that blocks RSV G binding to CX3CR1 can both decrease the pulmonary inflammatory response to RSV infection and increase viral clearance. These findings are similar to those seen when this antibody was given as treatment after RSV infection of mice (13, 23). The ability of prophylactic administration of MAb 131-2G to downregulate the pulmonary inflammatory response is broad and involves many cell types, including those associated with inflammation and the innate and adaptive immune responses.

Although prophylactic administration with anti-G MAb (131-2G) resulted in significantly diminished viral load in the lung, the MAb did not totally block viral replication, as indicated by detection of viral RNA by real-time PCR. Studies that have analyzed RSV infection of epithelial cells and macrophages found that addition of anti-F MAbs inhibited productive infection but did not block all viral gene expression (1), suggesting that intracellular infection is at least in part refractory to these antibodies.

Numerous studies have implicated the G protein in pathogenesis of RSV disease (2, 26, 31), including several that show that RSV G protein CX3C-CX3CR1 interaction is important for the enhanced-disease phenotype-associated RSV challenge of FI-RSV-immunized mice (33, 35). In one study, FI-RSV-immunized mice challenged with viruses lacking a functional CX3C motif or pretreated with anti-CX3CR1 antibodies did not develop enhanced disease (14). Our data are consistent with and support these earlier observations. In the present study, we show that MAb 131-2G given prophylactically as an intact antibody or F(ab′)2 fragments markedly downregulated the Th2-type inflammatory response to RSV challenge in FI-RSV-immunized mice as exemplified by the marked decrease in pulmonary eosinophilia, a hallmark of FI-RSV vaccine-enhanced disease (10, 25). The marked reduction in weight loss, an indicator of severity of illness in the mouse, is another clear indication of the ability of this MAb to alter the course of enhanced disease after RSV challenge in FI-RSV-immunized mice.

Taken together, the results suggest that MAb 131-2G given as a prophylactic (Fig. (Fig.1)1) or for treatment of infection in naïve or FI-RSV-immunized mice can substantially impact the virus-induced inflammatory response and likely decrease RSV disease (13). The decrease in pulmonary inflammation involves many cell types and is independent of the Fc portion of the antibody and viral clearance (23). We hypothesize that vaccination to achieve an anti-G protein antibody response with activities similar to that of MAb 131-2G might have a similar impact on the pulmonary inflammation and virus clearance and improve both the safety and efficacy of an RSV vaccine. Our recently reported study showing that vaccination with a polypeptide encompassing the central conserved region of the G protein (the binding site for MAb 131-2G) prevented body weight loss and lung histopathology and decreased lung virus titers after challenge with RSV strain A2 is consistent with this hypothesis (41). Moreover, serum antibodies from these vaccinated mice demonstrated G protein CX3C-CX3CR1 blocking activities in vitro (41). Thus, it is possible that a vaccine that includes an appropriately constructed component that induces antibodies that block G protein binding to CX3CR1 might eliminate the risk of enhanced disease that is otherwise present for a subunit or inactivated RSV vaccine in RSV-naïve infants.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by an appointment to the Research Participation Program at CDC administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and CDC. G.U.R. is an ORISE Fellow. This research was also supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (5RO1AI06275-03) and through the Georgia Research Alliance to R.A.T.

We thank Christopher Paddock (CDC) for technical assistance and Jennifer Harcourt for manuscript review. The RSV M gene primers were a gift from Dean Erdman (CDC).

R.A.T. and L.J.A. have an invention related to the study. No conflicts of interest exist among the authors based on federal regulations. G.U.R., H.C., C.M., and L.M.H. have no conflicts.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Footnotes

[down-pointing small open triangle]Published ahead of print on 30 June 2010.

REFERENCES

1. Boukhvalova, M. S., G. A. Prince, and J. C. Blanco. 2007. Respiratory syncytial virus infects and abortively replicates in the lungs in spite of preexisting immunity. J. Virol. 81:9443-9450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Castilow, E. M., M. R. Olson, and S. M. Varga. 2007. Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine-enhanced disease. Immunol. Res. 39:225-239. [PubMed]
3. Chin, J., R. L. Magoffin, L. A. Shearer, J. H. Schieble, and E. H. Lennette. 1969. Field evaluation of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and a trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine in a pediatric population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 89:449-463. [PubMed]
4. Council on Children with Disabilities. 2009. Policy statements—Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for children and youth with disabilities. Pediatrics 124:1702-1708. [PubMed]
5. Dudas, R. A., and R. A. Karron. 1998. Respiratory syncytial virus vaccines. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:430-439. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Duncan, C. B., E. E. Walsh, D. R. Peterson, F. E. Lee, and A. R. Falsey. 2009. Risk factors for respiratory failure associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. J. Infect. Dis. 200:1242-1246. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Falsey, A. R., P. A. Hennessey, M. A. Formica, C. Cox, and E. E. Walsh. 2005. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 352:1749-1759. [PubMed]
8. Fulginiti, V. A., J. J. Eller, O. F. Sieber, J. W. Joyner, M. Minamitani, and G. Meiklejohn. 1969. Respiratory virus immunization. I. A field trial of two inactivated respiratory virus vaccines; an aqueous trivalent parainfluenza virus vaccine and an alum-precipitated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. Am. J. Epidemiol. 89:435-448. [PubMed]
9. Gorman, J. J., B. L. Ferguson, D. Speelman, and J. Mills. 1997. Determination of the disulfide bond arrangement of human respiratory syncytial virus attachment (G) protein by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Protein Sci. 6:1308-1315. [PubMed]
10. Graham, B. S., T. R. Johnson, and R. S. Peebles. 2000. Immune-mediated disease pathogenesis in respiratory syncytial virus infection. Immunopharmacology 48:237-247. [PubMed]
11. Hall, C. B., G. A. Weinberg, M. K. Iwane, A. K. Blumkin, K. M. Edwards, M. A. Staat, P. Auinger, M. R. Griffin, K. A. Poehling, D. Erdman, C. G. Grijalva, Y. Zhu, and P. Szilagyi. 2009. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N. Engl. J. Med. 360:588-598. [PubMed]
12. Harcourt, J., R. Alvarez, L. P. Jones, C. Henderson, L. J. Anderson, and R. A. Tripp. 2006. Respiratory syncytial virus G protein and G protein CX3C motif adversely affect CX3CR1+ T cell responses. J. Immunol. 176:1600-1608. [PubMed]
13. Haynes, L. M., H. Caidi, G. U. Radu, C. Miao, J. L. Harcourt, R. A. Tripp, and L. J. Anderson. 2009. Therapeutic monoclonal antibody treatment targeting respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) G protein mediates viral clearance and reduces the pathogenesis of RSV infection in BALB/c mice. J. Infect. Dis. 200:439-447. [PubMed]
14. Haynes, L. M., L. P. Jones, A. Barskey, L. J. Anderson, and R. A. Tripp. 2003. Enhanced disease and pulmonary eosinophilia associated with formalin-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccination are linked to G glycoprotein CX3C-CX3CR1 interaction and expression of substance P. J. Virol. 77:9831-9844. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Haynes, L. M., J. Tonkin, L. J. Anderson, and R. A. Tripp. 2002. Neutralizing anti-F glycoprotein and anti-substance P antibody treatment effectively reduces infection and inflammation associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Virol. 76:6873-6881. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Huang, Y., and R. Anderson. 2005. Modulation of protective immunity, eosinophilia, and cytokine responses by selective mutagenesis of a recombinant G protein vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 79:4527-4532. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. The IMpact-RSV Study Group. 1998. Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. Pediatrics 102:531-537. [PubMed]
18. Ison, M. G. 2009. Respiratory syncytial virus and other respiratory viruses in the setting of bone marrow transplantation. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 21:171-176. [PubMed]
19. Johnson, T. R., and B. S. Graham. 2004. Contribution of respiratory syncytial virus G antigenicity to vaccine-enhanced illness and the implications for severe disease during primary respiratory syncytial virus infection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 23:S46-S57. [PubMed]
20. Li, X., S. Sambhara, C. X. Li, M. Ewasyshyn, M. Parrington, J. Caterini, O. James, G. Cates, R. P. Du, and M. Klein. 1998. Protection against respiratory syncytial virus infection by DNA immunization. J. Exp. Med. 188:681-688. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Malley, R., J. DeVincenzo, O. Ramilo, P. H. Dennehy, H. C. Meissner, W. C. Gruber, P. J. Sanchez, H. Jafri, J. Balsley, D. Carlin, S. Buckingham, L. Vernacchio, and D. M. Ambrosino. 1998. Reduction of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in tracheal aspirates in intubated infants by use of humanized monoclonal antibody to RSV F protein. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1555-1561. [PubMed]
22. Mejias, A., S. Chavez-Bueno, A. M. Rios, M. F. Aten, B. Raynor, E. Peromingo, P. Soni, K. D. Olsen, P. A. Kiener, A. M. Gomez, H. S. Jafri, and O. Ramilo. 2005. Comparative effects of two neutralizing anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) monoclonal antibodies in the RSV murine model: time versus potency. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4700-4707. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Miao, C., G. U. Radu, H. Caidi, R. A. Tripp, L. J. Anderson, and L. M. Haynes. 2009. Treatment with respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein monoclonal antibody or F(ab′)2 components mediates reduced pulmonary inflammation in mice. J. Gen. Virol. 90:1119-1123. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Murphy, B. R., G. A. Prince, E. E. Walsh, H. W. Kim, R. H. Parrott, V. G. Hemming, W. J. Rodriguez, and R. M. Chanock. 1986. Dissociation between serum neutralizing and glycoprotein antibody responses of infants and children who received inactivated respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:197-202. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Openshaw, P. J., F. J. Culley, and W. Olszewska. 2001. Immunopathogenesis of vaccine-enhanced RSV disease. Vaccine 20(Suppl. 1):S27-S31. [PubMed]
26. Oshansky, C. M., W. Zhang, E. Moore, and R. A. Tripp. 2009. The host response and molecular pathogenesis associated with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Future Microbiol. 4:279-297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Shay, D. K., R. C. Holman, R. D. Newman, L. L. Liu, J. W. Stout, and L. J. Anderson. 1999. Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalizations among US children, 1980-1996. JAMA 282:1440-1446. [PubMed]
28. Shay, D. K., R. C. Holman, G. E. Roosevelt, M. J. Clarke, and L. J. Anderson. 2001. Bronchiolitis-associated mortality and estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated deaths among US children, 1979-1997. J. Infect. Dis. 183:16-22. [PubMed]
29. Sullender, W. M., M. A. Mufson, G. A. Prince, L. J. Anderson, and G. W. Wertz. 1998. Antigenic and genetic diversity among the attachment proteins of group A respiratory syncytial viruses that have caused repeat infections in children. J. Infect. Dis. 178:925-932. [PubMed]
30. Tebbey, P. W., C. A. Unczur, N. A. LaPierre, and G. E. Hancock. 1999. A novel and effective intranasal immunization strategy for respiratory syncytial virus. Viral Immunol. 12:41-45. [PubMed]
31. Tripp, R. A. 2004. Pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Viral Immunol. 17:165-181. [PubMed]
32. Tripp, R. A., A. Dakhama, L. P. Jones, A. Barskey, E. W. Gelfand, and L. J. Anderson. 2003. The G glycoprotein of respiratory syncytial virus depresses respiratory rates through the CX3C motif and substance P. J. Virol. 77:6580-6584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Tripp, R. A., L. Jones, and L. J. Anderson. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus G and/or SH glycoproteins modify CC and CXC chemokine mRNA expression in the BALB/c mouse. J. Virol. 74:6227-6229. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Tripp, R. A., L. P. Jones, L. M. Haynes, H. Zheng, P. M. Murphy, and L. J. Anderson. 2001. CX3C chemokine mimicry by respiratory syncytial virus G glycoprotein. Nat. Immunol. 2:732-738. [PubMed]
35. Tripp, R. A., D. Moore, L. Jones, W. Sullender, J. Winter, and L. J. Anderson. 1999. Respiratory syncytial virus G and/or SH protein alters Th1 cytokines, natural killer cells, and neutrophils responding to pulmonary infection in BALB/c mice. J. Virol. 73:7099-7107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Tripp, R. A., D. Moore, J. Winter, and L. J. Anderson. 2000. Respiratory syncytial virus infection and G and/or SH protein expression contribute to substance P, which mediates inflammation and enhanced pulmonary disease in BALB/c mice. J. Virol. 74:1614-1622. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Waris, M. E., C. Tsou, D. D. Erdman, S. R. Zaki, and L. J. Anderson. 1996. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in BALB/c mice previously immunized with formalin-inactivated virus induces enhanced pulmonary inflammatory response with a predominant Th2-like cytokine pattern. J. Virol. 70:2852-2860. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Weibel, R. E., J. Stokes, Jr., M. B. Leagus, C. C. Mascoli, A. A. Tytell, A. F. Woodhour, P. P. Vella, and M. R. Hilleman. 1967. Respiratory virus vaccines. VII. Field evaluation of respiratory syncytial, parainfluenza 1, 2, 3, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae vaccines, 1965 to 1966. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 96:724-739. [PubMed]
39. Welliver, R. C. 2003. Review of epidemiology and clinical risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. J. Pediatr. 143:S112-S117. [PubMed]
40. WHO. 2009. Acute respiratory infections (update September 2009). WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/diseases/ari/en/index.html.
41. Zhang, W., Y. Choi, L. M. Haynes, J. L. Harcourt, L. J. Anderson, L. P. Jones, and R. A. Tripp. 2010. Vaccination to induce antibodies blocking the CX3C-CX3CR1 interaction of respiratory syncytial virus G protein reduces pulmonary inflammation and virus replication in mice. J. Virol. 84:1148-1157. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)