|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
Accumulation of neurotoxic βamyloid (Aβ) is a major hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD)1. Formation of Aβ is catalyzed by γsecretase, a protease with numerous substrates2,3. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms that confer substrate specificity on this potentially promiscuous enzyme. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying its selectivity is critical for the development of clinically effective γ-secretase inhibitors that can reduce Aβ formation without impairing cleavage of other γ-secretase substrates, especially Notch, which is essential for normal biological functions3,4. Here we report the discovery of a novel γ-secretase activating protein (gSAP), which dramatically and selectively increases Aβ production through a mechanism involving its interactions with both γsecretase and its substrate, the amyloid precursor protein C-terminal fragment (APP-CTF). gSAP does not interact with Notch nor does it affect its cleavage. Recombinant gSAP stimulates Aβ production in vitro. Reducing gSAP levels in cell lines decreases Aβ levels. Knockdown of gSAP in a mouse model of Alzheimers disease reduces levels of Aβ and plaque development. gSAP represents a new type of γ-secretase regulator that directs enzyme specificity by interacting with a specific substrate. We demonstrate that imatinib, an anti-cancer drug previously found to inhibit Aβ formation without affecting Notch cleavage5, achieves its Aβ-lowering effect by preventing gSAP interaction with the γ-secretase substrate, APP-CTF. Thus, gSAP can serve as an Aβ-lowering therapeutic target without affecting other key functions of γ-secretase.
We have reported that imatinib (STI571, Gleevec®) decreases production of all Aβ species by inhibiting γ-cleavage of APP-CTF5. To identify the direct target responsible for imatinib's selective Aβlowering activity, we synthesized a photoactivatable azido imatinib derivative, G01 (supplementary Methods and supplementary Fig. 2). When 125I-G01 was incubated with a membrane preparation followed by photolysis, none of the four components of γ-secretase were labeled. Rather, 125I-G01 labeled a ~ 16 kDa protein (Fig. 1a, left panel) which co-immunoprecipitated with the more slowly migrating 18 kDa presenilin-1-CTF (Fig. 1a, right panel). This result was confirmed by intact cell photolabeling using cell permeable 3H-G01: the 3H-imatinib derivative did not bind to any of the four γ-secretase components, but did label a band of ~16 kDa that co-immunoprecipitated with PS1 (Fig. 1a, middle panel).
To purify the potential target protein, we synthesized a biotinylated derivative of imatinib, “biotin-imatinib” (supplementary Methods and supplementary Fig. 3). Solubilized γ-secretase components, including presenilin-1, Pen-2, and nicastrin, were specifically captured by the immobilized biotin-imatinib (Fig. 1b, left panel). A ~16 kDa band was observed by silver staining (Fig. 1b, right panel) after biotin-imatinib bound proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, concurring with the photolabeling results. Peptide fragments, derived from this band after trypsin digestion, and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry, corresponded to the C-terminal region of an uncharacterized protein, pigeon homologue protein (PION) (human accession number: NP_059135). The identification was made based on two unique tryptic peptides (766LWDHPMSSNIISR778 and779NHVTRLLQNYKK790) covering approximately 20% of the 16 kDa fragment. Its sequence, especially the C-terminal region, is highly conserved among multiple species from chicken to human (supplementary Fig. 4). Expression pattern analysis indicates that this gene is expressed in diverse tissues, including brain (supplementary Fig. 5). In this report, we characterize PION as a gamma-secretase activating protein (gSAP).
Based on its predicted sequence, the full opening reading frame of human gSAP encodes a protein of 854 amino acids (~98 kDa). To determine whether the 16 kDa fragment was derived from a high molecular weight precursor, the metabolism of endogenous gSAP in cells was monitored by pulse-chase analysis. The results showed that gSAP is synthesized as a holo-protein (~98 kDa) and is rapidly processed into a ~ 16 kDa C-terminal fragment (gSAP-16K) (Fig. 1c). In the steady state, the 16 kDa fragment is the predominant form (Fig. 1c).
Incubation of cells with 3H-G01, followed by photolysis and immunoprecipitation with anti-gSAP antibody, confirmed that imatinib directly binds gSAP-16K (Fig. 1d). When gSAP levels were reduced using siRNA, the amount of γ-secretase (Fig. 1e, represented by PS1-CTF) associated with biotin-imatinib dramatically decreased. This indicates that the affinity of imatinib for the γ-secretase complex depends on gSAP.
The effect of gSAP on Aβ generation is shown in Fig. 2. When siRNA was used to reduce gSAP level (by 72 ± 15%) in N2a cells overexpressing APP695, the level of Aβ decreased about 50±7 % (Fig. 2a); imatinib had little or no additional effect on Aβ levels. This result indicates that gSAP is the molecule through which imatinib lowers Aβ. gSAP knockdown resulted in decreased levels of all major Aβ species; Aβ38 by 43±%, Aβ40 by 53±13%, and Aβ42 by 48±7%, respectively (Fig. 2b). gSAP showed no detectable effect on α- and β-cleavages (supplementary Fig. 6). To further investigate whether gSAP can modulate γ-secretase activity, the effect of purified gSAP on Aβ production was examined in an in vitro γ-secretase assay. When recombinant gSAP-16K (aa 733-854 of full length human gSAP), isolated after expression in E.coli, was added to membrane preparations from HEK cells containing overexpressed APP-β-CTF, Aβ level was increased and AICD level was reduced (Fig. 2c).
APP-CTF is cleaved by γ-secretase in the middle of its transmembrane domain to generate Aβ (γ-cleavage) and near its cytosolic membrane boundary to generate APP intracellular domain (AICD) (ε-cleavage). The effect of gSAP on AICD production was examined in N2a cells overexpressing APP695. Both gSAP knockdown and imatinib treatment increased levels of AICD (supplementary Fig. 7a). gSAP overexpression in HEK293 cells reduced AICD production (supplementary Fig. 7b). These results indicate that gSAP differentially regulates γ- andε-cleavage of APP-CTF to form Aβ and AICD respectively.
One distinctive feature of imatinib is its selective inhibition of Aβ production while sparing Notch cleavage5. The effect of gSAP on Notch cleavage was evaluated using cells expressing Notch ΔE (Notch without its extracellular domain), the Notch substrate for γ-secretase. As shown in Fig. 2d, the level of theγ-secretase cleavage product, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD), was not changed either by reducing gSAP levels using shRNA (left panel) or by overexpressing gSAP (right panel). In addition, gSAP had no effect on Notch cleavage in an in vitro γ-secretase assay (Fig. 2c, left panel). Thus, gSAP modulates the γ-secretase cleavage of APP, but not of Notch.
Additional evidence that endogenous gSAP forms a complex with γ-secretase was provided by examining the distribution of the proteins in subcellular fractions and in co-immunoprecipitation studies. Using a sucrose gradient, endogenous gSAP co-fractionated with a trans-Golgi network (TGN) marker, and with PS1-CTF (Supplementary Figure 8) and other γ-secretase components (not shown). Using gel filtration to separate membrane proteins from neuroblastoma cells solubilized in 1% CHAPSO, endogenous gSAP-16K and γ-secretase co-migrated as a high molecular weight complex (Fig. 3a). Further, endogenous gSAP co-immunoprecipitated with γ-secretase components, providing additional evidence that these proteins exist in a complex (Fig. 3b). Endogenous γ-secretase was isolated using an immobilized biotinylated derivative of the transition-state analogue L-685,4586. Endogenous gSAP-16K co-isolated with the enzyme–inhibitor complex, strongly suggesting that gSAP-16K is a co-factor for γ-secretase (Fig. 3c).
A number of proteases with broad substrate recognition can achieve specificity through auxiliary factors that couple the core enzyme to selective substrates7,8. To explore the mechanism by which gSAP might confer such specificity, we analyzed its association with specific substrates. gSAP-16K coimmunoprecipitated with APP-CTF but not with Notch δE (Fig. 3d); the interaction was reduced by imatinib in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3e). Disruption of this interaction by imatinib likely explains its Aβ-lowering activity. Domain mapping studies demonstrated that the juxtamembrane region of APP-CTF interacts with gSAP (supplementary Fig. 9). A truncated form of APP-CTF lacking the cytoplasmic domain (APPεCTF)9 did not interact with gSAP and its γ-cleavage was no longer stimulated by gSAP-16K in an in vitro assay (Fig. 3f).
To further determine the structural basis for the selective interaction of gSAP with APP-CTF, chimeric proteins were constructed by exchanging the AICD fragment in APP-CTF with the NICD fragment in NotchδE (supplementary Fig. 10a). gSAP selectively interacted with AICD, but not NICD in chimeric proteins (supplementary Fig. 10b). gSAP knockdown selectively increased AICD production, but had no influence on NICD production from the chimeric proteins (Supplementary Fig 10c). These results further demonstrated that the selective effect of gSAP on APP-CTF cleavage by γ-secretase involves gSAP binding to the cytoplasmic domain of the substrate.
To determine whether our findings are relevant to AD pathology, the effects of gSAP on Aβ levels and plaque development were examined in vivo. A conditional gSAP RNAi mouse line was generated by integration of a tetracycline-inducible gSAP shRNA vector into the mouse genomic locus. gSAP RNAi mice were then crossed with an AD mouse model (APPswe and PS1δE9 mutations; AD 2 X Tg-mice)10. To examine the long term effect of gSAP knockdown on Aβ levels and plaque development, the crossed gSAP RNAi- AD 2 X mice were continuously induced for 6 months. After induction, gSAP mRNA levels in these hybrid mouse brains were reduced by 85 ± 12% and similar decreases were achieved in other tissues; after six months induction, Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in the crossed mouse brains were lowered by 42 ± 13% and 40 ± 7%, respectively (Fig. 4a). Amyloid plaque load in crossed mouse brains with gSAP knockdown was reduced by 38 ± 9%, compared to the same line of mouse brains without induction (Fig. 4b). Doxycycline did not have an effect on either Aβ or plaque levels in AD 2 X mice. The Aβ-lowering effects of gSAP knockdown are similar to those caused by the γ-secretase inhibitor, dibenzazepine (DBZ)11, administered at 10 μmol/kg for 5 days (Supplementary Fig. 11a). In contrast, gSAP knockdown did not cause the intestinal mucosal cell metaplasia seen with DBZ (supplementary Fig. 11b): this latter effect is mediated by impaired Notch processing4,11. Furthermore, gSAP knockdown did not cause any pathological changes in spleen (data not shown), contrary to the severe marginal zone lymphoid depletion caused by DBZ administration12. These results indicate that gSAP knockdown reduces Aβ levels and plaque formation without affecting Notch-dependent pathways.
γ-Secretase processes diverse substrates with low homologies at their cleavage sites13. The various roles of γ-secretase during development and in tissue homeostasis require that its activity be tightly regulated. TMP2114, orphan G-protein-coupled receptor 315 and different Aph-1 isoforms16 have been reported to modulate Aβ production through γ-secretase but to spare Notch cleavage. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms by which they impart their specificities were not elucidated in those studies. Nevertheless, those important studies demonstrated that it is possible to selectively regulate substrate specificity of this vitally important and potentially promiscuous enzyme. gSAP appears to confer substrate specificity on γ-secretase by forming a ternary complex with γ-secretase and the substrate APP-CTF. The present results support the concept that appropriate cofactors impart substrate specificity on the γ-secretase core enzyme complex, as they do on a number of other proteases7,8.
The literature on the relationship between γ-cleavage and ε-cleavage of APP-CTF is controversial. For instance, there is some evidence supporting sequential cleavage of APP-CTF9,17. There is also extensive evidence reported in the literature that these two types of cleavage can occur independently18,19,20. Our data support the latter proposal. We hypothesize that removal of gSAP from the gSAP/γ-secretase/APP-CTF ternary complex alters the structural relationship between γ-secretase and APP-CTF facilitating ε-cleavage at the expense of γ-cleavage (supplementary Fig. 1). To elucidate the detailed mechanism by which gSAP modulates the cleavage of APP-CTF, it will be important to compare the stoichiometry of the various γ-secretase cleavage products in the presence and absence of gSAP.
Anti-amyloid therapy remains a rationale approach to the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. One promising anti-amyloid compound failed in limited clinical trials, owning to lack of accumulation in the brain21. Similarly, imatinib is actively excluded from the brain by a highly potent P-glycoprotein pump, a component of the blood-brain barrier22. The development of compounds which accumulate in the brain and target gSAP represents a valid approach for development of potential therapies against Alzheimer's disease.
See Methods for details of in vitro and intact cell photolabeling, affinity purification using immobilized biotin-imatinib, gSAP knockdown and overexpression, coimmunoprecipitation, gel filtration chromatography, affinity capture of endogenous γ-secretase using an immobilized transition state analogue, in vitro γ-secretase assay, gSAP RNAi mouse line generation, induction, immunohistochemistry and Aβ measurements.
For in vitro labeling, resuspended membranes isolated from HEK293 cells were incubated with 20 nM 125I-G01 for 3 hr at 4°C prior to photolysis at 254 nM for 2 min. For intact cell labeling, HEK293 cells were incubated with 0.1 μM 3H-G01 in Opti-MEM for 2 hours at 37°C before being transferred to ice for an additional hour. To examine labeling specificity, either membrane preparations or cells were treated with 50 μM unlabeled imatinib together with photoactivatible G01 in parallel assays. Photolysis was conducted on ice for 2 min at 254 nm. After photolysis, membranes or cells were disrupted in lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 1% CHAPSO with protease inhibitors) and immunoprecipitated with PS1-loop antibody. The immuno-purified material was eluted with SDS sample buffer and proteins were separated using a 10-20% Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred to PVDF for autoradiography.
Membrane preparations of HEK293 cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2, and 1% CHAPSO containing protease inhibitors, Roche Inc.) and incubated with Myone™ streptavidin T1 beads (Invitrogen) containing bound biotin-imatinib for 3 hr at 4 °C. Subsequently, the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer. Bound proteins were eluted with tricine SDS-PAGE sample buffer and separated on 10-20% tris-tricine gels. Silver staining was used to identify protein bands in SDS-PAGE gels. The ~ 16 kDa band was excised, trypsinized, and sequenced by tandem MS/MS mass spectrometry.
Rabbit polyclonal antiserum against gSAP was generated against the peptide CFEGHDNVDAEFVEEAALKHT (corresponding to aa 829-848 of human gSAP with an N-terminal cysteine attached for conjugation). Pulse-chase labeling experiments using neuroblastoma 2a cells were conducted as described23. Cells were pulsed for 15 min and the chase periods were initiated by replacing the medium with full culture medium and cells were incubated at 37°C. For continuous labeling, cells were labeled with 35S Protein Labeling Mix (Perkin Elmer) for 4 hr without chase. Cell monolayers were lysed in RIPA buffer followed by immunoprecipitation with gSAP antibody. The beads were incubated with Tris-tricine sample buffer to elute bound proteins which were then separated by 10-20% Tris-tricine gel, and transferred to PVDF membrane for autoradiography.
For cellular gSAP knockdown experiments, small interfering RNA (siRNA) of gSAP was purchased from Dharmacon Inc. The sequences of the siRNA used were as follows: sense sequence: AUGCAGAGCUGGACGACAUUU; antisense sequence: 5′-P.AUGUCGUCCAGCUCUGCAUUU. Neuroblastoma 2a cell line stably overexpressing APP695 was transfected with siRNA using DharmaFect 2 reagent at a concentration of 50 nM. Non-targeting control siRNA (Dharmacon Inc.) was transfected in parallel as control. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) of gSAP was purchased from Open Biosystems and transfected into cells using Arrest-In transfection reagent (Open Biosystems). The sequence of human gSAP shRNA in pGIPZ shRNAmir-GFP vector was as follows: TGCTGTTGACAGTGAGCGCGGAAATAGAGTGGTGATTAAATAGTGAAGCCACAGATGTATTTAATCACCACTCTATTTCCATGCCTACTGCCTCGGA. The knockdown efficiencies were examined using a real time PCR assay with Applied Biosystems 7900 H.T. System.
For gSAP overexpression in cells, mammalian expression vector pReceiver-M07 with the full length gSAP coding a C-terminal HA tag was purchased from Genecopoeia Inc. Plasmid was transfected into a stable HEK293 cell line overexpressing APP695, containing the Swedish mutation, using lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). pcDNA4-APP-β-CTF expression vector was a kind gift from Dr. Y.M. Li (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). APPε-CTF construct was derived from the pcDNA4-APP-β-CTF as reported9.
The levels of Aβ species were quantified using a highly sensitive ELISA assay from Meso Scale Drug Discoveries. Immunoprecipitation of Aβ was performed as described5.
For Notch cleavage analysis, cells transfected with NotchΔE5 were co-transfected with gSAP-shRNA or gSAP plasmids. After two days of transfection, Notch expression and cleavage were detected with anti-myc antibody. The cleaved Notch intracellular domain (NICD) was detected with a cleavage-specific antibody (Notch1 Val-1744, Cell Signaling Inc.). Cells treated with L-685,458 served as controls.
For co-immunoprecipitation, cells were lysed in 50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 1% CHAPSO, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2, with protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was performed using the corresponding antibody and protein G plus/ protein A beads for 2 hr on ice. Immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblots. Presenilin 1 loop antibody (EMD Biosciences) was used to detect PS1-CTF; PEN-2 antibody was purchased from EMD Biosciences. Nicastrin antibody was from BD Biosciences. HA monoclonal antibody and Myc tag polyclonal antibody were from Genscript Inc. APP-CTF was detected using the 369 antibody24. 6E10 and 4G8 antibodies from Covance were used to detect Aβ.
Solubilized membrane preparations from N2a cells (0.2 ml, ~1 mg of solubilized protein, in 50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 1% CHAPSO, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2) were applied to a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE healthcare) of an AKTA fast performance liquid chromatography system. Fractionation was performed in the lysate buffer at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and 1-ml fractions were collected. Endogenous gSAP was detected after immunoprecipitated with gSAP antibody. Each fraction was analyzed by immunoblot using γ-secretase antibodies.
Compound 4, a biotinylated γ-secretase transition state analogue6, was a kind gift from Dr. Y.M. Li (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). HEK293 cell lysates in 50 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 1% CHAPSO, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM CaCl2 were incubated with compound 4 immobilized on streptavidin Myone™ magnetic beads for 2 hrs at 4°C. The beads were then washed three times with lysate buffer. The captured proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE and processed for immunoblot analysis.
The in vitro γ-secretase assay was as described25 except for the use of APP-CTF or NotchΔE overexpressed in HEK293 cells rather than recombinant proteins from E.coli. Recombinant gSAP-16K (aa733-854 of the human gSAP) was expressed in BL21 DE3 E.coli and purified. After 2 hr of 35S labeling, membrane preparations from HEK293 cells overexpressing APP-CTF were resuspended in 200 μl of assay buffer with 2 μg recombinant gSAP-16K or the same amount of BSA as control. A parallel system with 1 μM L685,458 (γ-secretase inhibitor) was also used as a control. The membrane suspension was pre-incubated at 4 °C for 1 hr and then incubated for 2 hr at 37 °C to allow in vitro generation of Aβ. Aβ was immunoprecipitated from the lysate using 4G8 antibody, separated on 10-20% Tris-tricine gel, and transferred to PVDF membrane for autoradiography.
Inducible RNAi mice were generated by incorporating gSAP shRNA TCCCGGAACTCCATGATTGACAAATTTCAA GAGAATTTGTCAATCATGGAGTTCC TTTTTA into the mouse genome (B6/129S6 background) under the control of a H1-Tet promoter as described26 (TaconicArtemis Inc.). Heterozygous RNAi mice were then crossed with an AD mouse model with APPswe and PS1Δ9 mutations (AD 2× mice) to generate gSAP-RNAi AD mice for Aβ analyses.
shRNA was induced in 2 month old gSAP RNAi-AD mice with doxycycline for 1 month by adding 2 mg/ml doxycycline (Sigma) into drinking water containing 10% sucrose. Control mice were fed drinking water containing 10% sucrose. gSAP knockdown efficiency in mice was assayed using real time PCR. Aβ levels from mouse hippocampus were measured by ELISA (Wako Chemicals). Intestinal dissection and histochemical staining (H &E and PAS staining) were conducted as described elsewhere11.
For immunohistochemistry studies, mouse brains were processed and labeled with the anti-Aβ antibody 6E10 (Novus Biologicals) to visualize extracellular amyloid plaques using an M.O.M immunodetection kit (Vector laboratories).
We thank Ms. Eileen Woo and Dr. Brian Chait in The Rockefeller University for their help with protein identification. We thank Dr. Yue Ming Li in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for providing us the biotinylated transition state analogue. We thank Mr. Bryce Turner and Ms. Stacy Ku for their technical support. This work was supported by NIH grant AG09464 to P.G., DOD grant W81XWH-09-1-0402 to P.G., the Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation and the F.M. Kirby Foundation.
Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature