Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of biolettershomepageaboutsubmitalertseditorial board
Biol Lett. 2010 October 23; 6(5): 711–714.
Published online 2010 March 24. doi:  10.1098/rsbl.2010.0124
PMCID: PMC2936143

Individual specialists in a generalist population: results from a long-term stable isotope series


Individual variation in resource use has often been ignored in ecological studies, but closer examination of individual patterns through time may reveal significant intrapopulation differences. Adult loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) are generalist carnivores with a wide geographical range, resulting in a broad isotopic niche. We microsampled scute, a persistent and continuously growing tissue, to examine long-term variation in resource use (up to 12 years) in 15 nesting loggerhead turtles. Using stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon, we examined the resource use patterns (integration of diet, habitat and geographical location) and demonstrate that individual loggerheads are long-term specialists within a generalist population. We present our results in the context of a conceptual model comparing isotopic niches in specialist and generalist populations. Individual consistency may have important ecological, evolutionary and conservation consequences, such as the reduction of intraspecific competition.

Keywords: isotopic niche, resource use, sea turtles, specialist, stable isotopes

1. Introduction

Hutchinson's (1957) conceptualization of the niche as an n-dimensional hypervolume of resource use has since been expanded in the ecological literature. Van Valen (1965) first incorporated the idea of individual variation in resource use into niche theory, but intrapopulation variation in resource use is often overlooked in ecological studies (Bolnick et al. 2003). While there are many niche concepts based on various ecological characteristics, a recent expansion of the niche theory uses stable isotopes as the measure of niche width (Bearhop et al. 2004; Newsome et al. 2007). Examining intra- and inter-individual isotopic variance can be an effective way to investigate specialization and the ecological niche (Newsome et al. 2007; but see Matthews & Mazumder 2004).

Stable isotopes of consumers reflect that of prey as well as the habitat of the individual. Nitrogen isotopes typically indicate trophic position (Post 2002), while carbon isotopes reflect variation in baseline producers or habitat (DeNiro & Epstein 1978). Tissues that are created over time and remain inert after synthesis, such as hair, otoliths and baleen, reflect resource use at the time of formation (Hobson 1999) and allow longitudinal sampling with stable isotope analysis of successive microlayers (Cerling et al. 2009; Cherel et al. 2009). Sea turtles have such a tissue—scute—which is a keratinized epidermis covering the bony shell of most chelonians. Scute grows from basal epidermis and accumulates with the oldest tissue at the surface, making possible the examination of resource use (which we define here as the integration of diet, habitat and geographical location) of individuals over time.

Figure 1 presents a conceptual model of the isotopic records from an inert tissue of three hypothetical time series of resource use for one specialist and two generalist populations. In our model, isotopic signatures may be influenced by diet, habitat type and geographical location. We use specialization to refer to the use of a relatively limited fraction of the possible range of available resources. In the specialist population (figure 1a), both individual and population isotopic niche widths are narrow. In the first generalist population (figure 1b), generalist individuals vary widely in their resource use, resulting in an isotopic record that shifts through time so that both individuals and the population occupy a wide isotopic niche space. In the second generalist population (figure 1c), specialist individuals maintain consistent resource use within a narrow isotopic niche space, but variation among individuals results in a wide population isotopic niche. Without long-term individual records, the generalist populations in figure 1b,c are indistinguishable. As drawn, our conceptual model assumes no temporal variation. However, the horizontal lines in figure 1a,c would exhibit a cyclic pattern if seasonal variation occurred. Our model does not address asynchronous temporal variation among sites.

Figure 1.

Conceptual model of three population patterns of isotope signatures representing resource use through time. Arrows track individuals, and each circle represents the δ15N value for a layer of inert tissue, which reflects resource use (integration ...

The endangered loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) is a generalist species that feeds on a wide range of prey (Bjorndal 1997). Loggerheads nesting in Florida forage over a broad geographical range from New Jersey, USA, to Belize, and these geographical areas have different isotopic baselines (Reich et al. 2010). We examine the long-term consistency in resource use of a nesting loggerhead population through stable isotope analysis of δ15N and δ13C in scute layers to distinguish between the two types of generalist populations. Given the generalist nature at the population level, our objective is to reveal the individual patterns of resource use in loggerheads—that is, do individuals forage over a broad resource base or are they specialists within the generalist population?

2. Material and methods

Scute samples were taken with sterile 6 mm biopsy punches from 15 adult female loggerheads (curved carapace length range 86.5–108.8 cm) while nesting at Cape Canaveral National Seashore, FL, USA, in May–June 2004. After lipid extraction with petroleum ether using an accelerated solvent extractor, scutes were microsampled in 50 µm layers to provide a sufficient sample for stable isotope analysis using a carbide end mill with x, y and z axes controls to a precision of 10 µm. The number of 50 µm layers in a sample ranged from 8 to 22.

We analysed variation in δ15N and δ13C using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with the Wilks' lambda test. We then used protected analysis of variances (ANOVAs) to compare variation in δ15N or δ13C within and among turtles.

We estimated the time required for scute to grow 50 µm to calculate the duration represented in an entire scute sample. First, we adjusted the known rate of isotopic incorporation of scute in growing juvenile loggerheads (Reich et al. 2008) to non-growing adults. Using the adjusted incorporation rate, we estimated the complete turnover as four half-lives, which is the time a new isotopic equilibrium would be reached after a shift in resource use. We applied this to an apparent shift in the δ13C signature of one individual that occurred over several layers (open circle in figure 2b; figure S1 in electronic supplementary material). See electronic supplementary material for detailed methods.

Figure 2.

(a) δ15N values of successive scute layers from 15 loggerheads. Each line represents all layers for one individual, noted with a unique symbol. (b) δ13C values with the same format and the same individual symbols as (a). Starting points ...

3. Results

We estimated that one 50 µm layer of loggerhead scute is equivalent to 0.6 years. The scute samples range from 400 to 1100 µm in depth, and thus, the time interval in the entire scute record ranges from 4 to 12 years (median 8).

Individuals exhibit high consistency in both δ15N and δ13C (figure 2), and the mean range of individuals is much smaller than that of the population for nitrogen and carbon (table 1). Individual patterns in resource use in both δ15N and δ13C combined (figure S2 in electronic supplementary material) reveal individual consistency (MANOVA, F = 437, p < 0.001). Based on ANOVAs, variation within individuals (less than 7% of total variation) was less than that among individuals (table 2).

Table 1.
Minimum, maximum and mean ranges of δ15N and δ13C for individual scute records (n = 15). (The population range is the difference between the maximum and minimum values for all individuals.)
Table 2.
ANOVAs indicate significant differences between the means of individuals, with a large proportion of the variation attributed to among rather than within individuals.

4. Discussion

We estimate that loggerhead scute samples may contain up to 12 years of resource use history, providing a lengthy record from which to investigate patterns in a long-lived species. To our knowledge, our study reports the longest record of resource use history obtained from living individuals.

Comparison of long-term scute records (figure 2) with isotopic scenarios presented in figure 1 reveals that this generalist population is composed of individual specialists. Although all of these loggerheads were sampled at the same nesting beach and an entire ocean basin is potentially available to the population, individuals use only a limited fraction of the available isotopic niche space (figure S2 in the electronic supplementary material).

In our study, specialization is not limited to a diet consisting of a single prey item, but the observed specialization results from a consistent mixture of prey, habitat and geographical location, which we are unable to separate with our sampling regime. Consumption of a prey mixture is likely, as individual loggerhead stomach contents often contain several prey species (Bjorndal 1997). While some of the variation among individuals may be owing to individual variation in isotopic discrimination or physiology rather than differences in foraging (Barnes et al. 2008), it is unlikely that this would result in the wide isotopic range observed.

The large population range in δ15N values (9.0‰) could be indicative of a population that is feeding over several trophic levels if the baseline nitrogen is stable in all of the foraging locations of these individuals (Post 2002). However, if baseline nitrogen signatures change with foraging location, isotopic differences will be more reflective of habitat or location than of trophic level feeding differences because the same prey species will have different isotope signatures among these areas. We believe locational differences are more likely than trophic level differences, as the similarly large range of δ13C values (10.5‰) indicates that loggerheads have geographically separated foraging areas and/or are incorporated in food webs with enriched or depleted δ13C producers.

The gap in δ13C values between −12.5‰ and −14.5‰ (figure 2b) represents the division between two foraging groups identified by Reich et al. (2010). The groups represent two general habitat use patterns that could result from food webs with different δ13C baselines owing to an isotopic gradient (e.g. oceanic/neritic, pelagic/benthic, latitudinal). Only one turtle crossed between groups, indicating that individuals have high fidelity to foraging sites and/or habitat type. This foraging fidelity is consistent with the observations of eight adult female loggerheads tracked from North Carolina, USA; two different movement types were observed, but all individuals exhibited interannual fidelity to discrete foraging sites (Hawkes et al. 2007).

Intrapopulation variation in resource use can have ecological, evolutionary and conservation consequences. Resource use heterogeneity, indicated by the broad population isotopic niche width and narrow individual niche widths, reduces intraspecific competition and may alter selective pressures (Bolnick et al. 2003). Reduction in intraspecific competition appears to be substantial in adult loggerheads, given the small proportion of variance in our study attributed to within-individual variation (less than 7%, table 1). In comparison, a recent study of diet specialization in sea otters, based on vibrissae isotope signatures, estimated that 28 per cent of the variance was attributed to within-individual variation (Newsome et al. 2009).

Examining the degree of individual specialization within a population provides a better understanding of its ecology, behaviour and population dynamics. Our approach to resource use has broad application for species that possess consistently growing, inert tissues that can be serially sampled. Because diet and habitat are confounded in this study, loggerheads should be sampled at a series of foraging grounds to distinguish the effects of diet, habitat and geographical location on isotopic signatures.


This study was conducted under the University of Florida IACUC (Protocol no. D-093), Florida FWC (Permit no. TP-016) and US National Park Service (Permit no. CANA-2004-SCI-0003).

This study was funded by National Marine Fisheries Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, FWC Marine Turtle Grants Program, Cape Canaveral National Seashore and NSF-GRFP (H.B.V.Z.). We thank B. Bolker, J. Curtis, P. Eliazar, J. Gillooly, A. Hayward, A. Hein, C. Martínez del Rio, S. Oppel, N. Osman, T. Palmer, J. Steiner and two anonymous referees.


  • Barnes C., Jennings S., Polunin N. V. C., Lancaster J. E. 2008. The importance of quantifying inherent variability when interpreting stable isotope field data. Oecologia 155, 227–235 (doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0904-y) [PubMed]
  • Bearhop S., Adams C. E., Waldron S., Fuller R. A., Macleod H. 2004. Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1007–1012 (doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00861.x)
  • Bjorndal K. A. 1997. Foraging ecology and nutrition of sea turtles. In The biology of sea turtles, vol. 1 (eds Lutz P. L., Musick J. A., editors. ), pp. 199–230 Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Bolnick D. I., Svanback R., Fordyce J. A., Yang L. H., Davis J. M., Hulsey C. D., Forister M. L. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161, 1–28 (doi:10.1086/343878) [PubMed]
  • Cherel Y., Kernaléguen L., Richard P., Guinet G. 2009. Whisker isotopic signature depicts migration patterns and multi-year intra- and inter-individual foraging strategies in fur seals. Biol. Lett. 5, 830–832 (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0552) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cerling T. E., Wittemyer G., Ehleringer J. R., Remien C. H., Douglas-Hamilton I. 2009. History of Animals using Isotope Records (HAIR): a 6-year dietary history of one family of African elephants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8093–8100. [PubMed]
  • DeNiro M. J., Epstein S. 1978. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 495–506 (doi:10.1016/0016-7037(78)90199-0)
  • Hawkes L. A., Broderick A. C., Coyne M. S., Godfrey M. H., Godley B. J. 2007. Only some like it hot: quantifying the environmental niche of the loggerhead sea turtle. Diversity Distrib. 13, 447–457 (doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00354.x)
  • Hobson K. A. 1999. Tracing origins and migration of wildlife using stable isotopes: a review. Oecologia 120, 314–326 (doi:10.1007/s004420050865)
  • Hutchinson G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427.
  • Matthews B., Mazumder A. 2004. A critical evaluation of intrapopulation variation of δ13C and isotopic evidence of individual specialization. Oecologia 140, 361–371 (doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1579-2) [PubMed]
  • Newsome S. D., Martínez del Rio C., Bearhop S., Phillips D. L. 2007. A niche for isotopic ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 429–436.
  • Newsome S. D., Tinker M. T., Monson D. H., Oftedal O. T., Ralls K., Staedler M. M., Fogel M. L., Estes J. A. 2009. Using stable isotopes to investigate individual diet specialization in California sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). Ecology 90, 961–974 (doi:10.1890/07-1812.1) [PubMed]
  • Post D. M. 2002. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0703:USITET]2.0.CO;2)
  • Reich K. J., Bjorndal K. A., Martínez del Rio C. 2008. Effects of growth and tissue type on the kinetics of 13C and 15N incorporation in a rapidly growing ectotherm. Oecologia 155, 651–663 (doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0949-y) [PubMed]
  • Reich K. J., Bjorndal K. A., Frick M. G., Witherington B. E., Johnson C., Bolten A. B. 2010. Polymodal foraging in adult female loggerheads (Caretta caretta). Mar. Biol. 157, 113–121 (doi:10.1007/s00227-009-1300-4)
  • Van Valen L. 1965. Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am. Nat. 99, 377–390 (doi:10.1086/282379)

Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society