Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of indiapaceSubmissionsIndian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010; 10(9): 426–428.
Published online 2010 September 5.
PMCID: PMC2933370

Uncommon Presentation of a Common Tachycardia


We describe a patient with an implanted pacemaker for impaired AV conduction who presented with an incessant tachycardia. EP study showed that the tachycardia was atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with repeated spontaneous initiation because of poor or absent antegrade fast pathway conduction. Slow pathway ablation was successful in terminating the tachycardia and making it non-inducible.

Keywords: atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, incessant tachycardia

Case Report

During a follow-up visit in the pacemaker clinic, a 45-year-old male complained of persistent palpitations for the past 2 months. He had undergone implantation of a permanent single chamber pacemaker with a ventricular lead 18 years back for trifascicular block with intermittent complete heart block and had subsequently undergone pulse generator replacement twice. His heart rate in the clinic was 130 bpm. Echocardiogram showed normal LV function without any abnormalities. He was not on any drugs. Electrocardiogram showed a broad complex tachycardia with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology, 1:1 ventriculo-atrial (VA) association and a short RP interval. An electrophysiology study was planned in view of the persistent tachycardia.

In the electrophysiology lab, he had tachycardia at the beginning of the procedure. The tachycardia could be easily terminated with ventricular overdrive pacing, and on termination of the tachycardia he was found to have sinus rhythm with a PR interval of 380 ms and broad QRS of RBBB morphology. However, tachycardia would always reinitiate spontaneously after a few beats of sinus rhythm (Figure 1). During sinus rhythm, the atrio-his (AH) interval was 274 ms and the his-ventricular (HV) interval was 49 ms. Atrial programmed stimulation could not be performed as any attempt at atrial pacing immediately resulted in tachycardia initiation. Ventricular pacing showed decremental VA conduction with central atrial activation, VA Wenckebach block at 410 ms and VA effective refractory period of 600/360 ms.

Figure 1
A different instance of spontaneous onset of AVNRT without a premature beat is shown in each panel.

Intracardiac electrograms during tachycardia showed 1:1 VA association with VA interval of 95 ms and central atrial activation. RV overdrive pacing at a cycle length (CL) slightly shorter than the tachycardia CL showed a ventricle-atrium-ventricle (VAV) response on termination of pacing with post pacing interval 216 ms longer than the tachycardia cycle length and VA interval was 150 ms longer than stimulus-atrial (SA) interval, all consistent with typical slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Response of tachycardia to RV overdrive pacing confirming the diagnosis of AVNRT.

Due to the incessant nature of the tachycardia, mapping had to be performed in tachycardia in the region of the slow pathway guided by fluoroscopy and electrograms. Ablation near the os of the coronary sinus was accompained by junctional beats. Post ablation, patient remained in sinus rhythm. AH and HV intervals were 228 ms and 50 ms respectively. Atrial programmed stimulation showed no dual pathway physiology and tachycardia could not be induced with atrial premature stimuli or burst pacing.


AVNRT usually presents as a paroxysmal form of tachycardia with each episode lasting for a short period of time. We could find only one report of incessant presentation of AVNRT [1]. In patients with poor antegrade AV nodal conduction, AVNRT can present as a slow tachycardia [2]. In addition, the poor or absent antegrade fast pathway conduction in our patient caused recurrent spontaneous tachycardia induction without premature stimuli or AH prolongation and resulted in the presentation as an incessant tachycardia. Although the symptoms were mild due to the slow rate, the persistent tachycardia is likely to result in development of ventricular dysfunction over time and therefore required treatment. While it was initially considered that fast pathway ablation should be the treatment in such patients with a prolonged PR interval at baseline, it has been shown that slow pathway ablation is safe and does not result in worsening of antegrade conduction [3]. Preserving antegrade AV nodal conduction was not critical in our patient, however the AH and PR intervals did not change after the successful slow pathway ablation.


  • Furushima H, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for incessant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia normalized H-V block associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol. 2004;37:315. [PubMed]
  • Vijayaraman P, et al. Slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant arrhythmias: clinical recognition, electrophysiological characteristics, and response to radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:950. [PubMed]
  • Pasquie JL, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and pre-existing prolonged PR interval. Europace. 2006;8:129. [PubMed]

Articles from Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal are provided here courtesy of Elsevier