PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 September 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2933324
NIHMSID: NIHMS209649

Enhanced induction of Mucin Depleted Foci in Estrogen Receptor β Knockout Mice

Abstract

The role of the estrogen receptor β (ERβ) in the colon has received considerable interest, yet in vivo models are needed to better define its protective actions. In the present study, wild-type (WT), ERα and ERβ knockout (αERKO and βERKO) mice were injected with azoxymethane (AOM), a colon chemical carcinogen. Fourteen weeks after AOM exposure the incidence of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) was assessed by methylene blue staining. βERKO mice showed significantly higher incidence (P < 0.001) of ACF (15.0 ± 2.5) as compared to αERKO (3.4 ± 1.0) and WT (4.6 ± 1.0) mice. The colons in several βERKO mice had increased thickness and loss of normal morphology. It has been reported that ERβ plays a role in maintenance of the colonic crypt architecture; this may explain the loss of crypt organization in the colonic epithelium of βERKO mice. The presence of mucin depleted foci (MDF) has been shown, both in humans and in rodents, as an early event in colon cancer. Therefore, in order to surpass the limitations with ACF scoring, we performed alcian blue-neutral red staining to assess the presence of MDF. This assay allowed the assessment of precancerous lesions on all the βERKO mice colons (38.3 ± 4.0; P < 0.001), comparing to WT and αERKO mice (6.6 ± 1.5, and 10.0 ± 1.9, respectively), and served to confirm the ACF results. Together these data support the use of MDF staining as a biomarker for precancerous lesions and the protective role of ERβ in colon carcinogenesis.

Keywords: Estrogen receptors, colon cancer, aberrant crypt foci, mucin depleted foci

Introduction

The incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) are similar among the genders (1), however, women who have a history of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) demonstrate a reduction of colon cancer risk (2). Similarly, both parity and oral contraceptive (OC) use seem to exert preventive effects against colon carcinogenesis in females (3,4,5). These protective effects have been attributed, in part, to the high levels of endogenous (pregnancy) and/or exogenous (OC and/or HRT) estrogens (6,7). Yet, the mechanism(s) through which estrogens are protective against colon cancer is still unclear.

Estrogens bind to two distinct nuclear estrogen receptors (ER), ERα and ERβ (8). The expression of the two ER subtypes is tissue specific, with ERα levels in the colon being lower than ERβ. No differences have been reported for ERα expression between normal and malignant human colon. While ERα has a more regulatory role in mammary carcinogenesis, ERβ is the predominant functional form in the human colon (9, 10). Interestingly, a selective loss of this protein has been observed during progression of several types of cancer, including colon (11, 12). These results support the notion that estrogen mediated protection of colon cancer may be regulated by ERβ. Although the mechanism by which ERβ mediates its effects is not well known, the silencing of the ERβ by methylation has been considered as one of the early events in colorectal and breast carcinogenesis (13, 14, 15). Although these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that ERβ may be a potential tumor suppressor (16), further in vivo studies are needed to better clarify the biological function(s) of the two ER subtypes during colon tumorigenesis. The ability to produce animals with disrupted ER genes has been proven to be a useful tool to discern the physiological role of each ER subtype in various tissues (17). Therefore, to better understand the functional significance of ERs in colon carcinogenesis we used wild-type (WT), αERKO (18) and βERKO (19) mice to investigate whether the absence of ERα or ERβ affect the incidence of azoxymethane (AOM)-induced aberrant crypt foci (ACF). The ACF were first described by Bird as one of the early events occurring in colon cancer progression (20), and since then they have been characterized as potential colonic precancerous lesions in rodent models (21, 22). More recently, mucin depleted foci (MDF), dysplastic crypts characterized by the absence or low production of mucin, were identified as colonic premalignant lesions present in rodent models after AOM or 1,2-dimethylhydrazine dihydrochloride treatments (23, 24). These reports showed that MDF had more dysplastic changes and overexpression of β-catenin than ACF. Moreover, MDF have also been found in human colons of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and with sporadic CRC (25). These findings support the significance of MDF as a possible biomarker in the identification of colon cancer (26, 27). In the present study, we evaluated the incidence of both ACF and MDF in the colons of AOM-treated genetically engineered mice in order to discern the role of ERs in colon carcinogenesis progression.

Materials and Methods

Animals and carcinogen treatment

The breeding pairs of αERKO and βERKO mice were obtained from Dr. Dennis Lubahn (University of Missouri) and are maintained at IIT Research Institute. The KO status was confirmed by genotyping. The background-WT C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles Rivers laboratories (Raleigh, NC) and used as wild type controls. Animals were quarantined for 7 days and housed four mice per cage, with a 12-hr light-dark cycle and a relative humidity of 50%. Drinking water and diet were supplied ad libitum. This study was approved by the IIT Research Institute Animal Use and Care Committee.

For this study, twenty four 16 weeks old mice were divided into three groups according to their ER genotype. The groups consisted of eight WT, eight αERKO and eight βERKO mice, divided as four females and four males per each group. All animals were injected subcutaneously with the colon carcinogen AOM (10mg/kg body weight) once a week for 4 weeks (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). AOM was dissolved in normal saline and kept on ice throughout the procedure. Animals were weighed weekly from the beginning to the end of the study (15 weeks).

Identification of ACF

At week 15 following the initiation of the study, the animals were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation. The colons were evaluated for ACF by the procedure previously established in our laboratory using methylene blue staining (28). The number and size of ACF per colon were determined under the microscope Olympus DP70 at a magnification of ×20 and ×40. The ACF were distinguished from surrounding non-aberrant crypts by their increased size, elongated luminal opening, increased distance from luminal to basal surface of cells, thickened epithelial cell lining, and enlarged pericryptal area, relative to surrounding normal crypts.

Identification of MDF

After ACF determination, colons were stained with alcian blue-neutral red (AB-NR) for MDF evaluation (29). The colons were stained with AB solution for 10 min and then incubated in NR (0.5% aqueous solution) for 10 seconds. The AB-NR stained colons were scored under the Olympus DP70 microscope (×10 and ×20 magnification). The colonic epithelial normal mucosa appeared as a reddish background (NR staining) dotted with blue spots representing the opening of normal crypts full of mucus stained with AB. The MDF were distinguished from this blue-dotted background as a reddish spot in which the crypts do not produce mucin. Besides this characteristic, MDF can be identified, according to a criteria described by Caderni et al. (23, 27) as elevated focal lesions with a multiplicity (i.e. the number of crypts per focus) of >3 crypts often distorted and smaller than normal surrounding crypts. The size of each MDF was determined with the MicroSuite™ Biological Suite 5.0 (Build 1044) – Olympus program. The area of each MDF was determined and then divided by the area of one crypt in order to determine the multiplicity of the MDF.

Quantitative Immunohistochemistry

Tissues were sectioned (4 µm thick) and processed for immunohistochemistry as previously described (30). The antibody anti-Ki-67 rabbit monoclonal (1:50) (Thermo α Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA) was used to assess the proliferation status on βERKO, ERKO and WT mice colon sections. For all sections, controls were obtained by using the same procedure, except that they were not exposed to primary antibody.

Chromogen abundance was quantified by quantitative-immunohistochemistry as previously described by Matkowskyj et al. (31, 32). Fifteen random images of the fully stained sections were saved in TIFF format, and the amount of chromogen per pixel was determined by subtracting the value for chromogen abundance of the control slide from that in the homologous region of the experimental slide. For all images the relevant stained region was isolated from the rest of the image using Photoshop (Adobe Systems; Palo Alto, CA) and used for chromogen quantification using the Tiffalyzer program (31, 32).

Quantitative histochemical detection of apoptosis

Colonic sections (4µm thick) were evaluated for the presence of apoptotic cells by TUNEL assay using FragEL DNA fragmentation detection kit (Calbiochem, EMD, Gibbstown, NJ) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantification of chromogen corresponding to the apoptotic cells was determined as described for immunohistochemistry quantification.

Statistical analysis

One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical comparisons among different genotypes Bonferroni Multiple Comparison test was used to determine statistical differences between groups using GraphPad InStat Software (San Diego CA). Differences were considered statistically significant when p was < 0.05.

Results

Azoxymethane injections increased ACF and MDF incidence in colons of βERKO mice

Intact C57BL/6, βERKO, and αERKO mice were injected with AOM at 16 weeks of age and monitored for occurrence of ACF after a 15 week study. No weight loss was observed in the three genotypes. When assessing the mean number (±SE) of ACF per colon, it was observed that the WT and the αERKO groups had 4.6 ± 1.0 and 3.4 ± 1.0 ACF, respectively, whereas the mean number in the βERKO group was significantly higher (15.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) (Fig. 1A). We also calculated the average number of ACF per cm of colon, for each genotype, observing a significant increased number of ACF in the βERKO mice (p < 0.001) (Table 1). As expected, AOM treatment induced multiple ACF of various sizes (Fig. 2A–C), which were similarly distributed regardless of genotype with the greatest number of ACF located in the distal colon. Aberrant crypt foci composed of 4 or more crypts (≥ 4 crypts/ACF), also known as “large” ACF (Fig. 2C), have been more closely correlated with subsequent development of colon cancer (23). The βERKO mice showed a significantly higher incidence (p < 0.01) of “large” ACF compared to the αERKO and WT groups (Table 1). In addition, colons from 3 out of 8 βERKO mice presented increased thickness and loss of normal morphology as revealed by MB staining, which did not allow the scoring of ACF in these βERKO colons. In order to surpass the limitations with ACF scoring, the incidence of MDF in the AOM-treated mice was evaluated after AB-NR staining. This assay allowed us to complete the assessment of MDF (Fig. 2D–F) in colons of all the mice, including those colons which previously could not be scored for ACF. For MDF, the βERKO mice showed an average of 38.3 ± 4.0 MDF per colon, which was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the mean number observed on the WT and αERKO colons (6.6 ± 1.5, and 10.0 ± 1.9, respectively) (Fig. 1B). The same statistical difference was obtained between βERKO vs. WT and αERKO groups when analyzed the mean number of MDF per cm of colon (Table 1). We also determined the number of “large” MDF, which have been characterized as having a multiplicity equal or higher than 12 crypts per focus (≥12 crypts/MDF) (23), per colon (Fig. 2F). The data showed a greater number of “large” MDF in the βERKO colons comparing to the WT and αERKO groups (p < 0.01) (Table 1). No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between WT and αERKO groups in all the parameters analyzed, as well as between females and males of each group.

Fig. 1
Influence of ERα and ERβ-deficiency on incidence of ACF and MDF in AOM-treated WT and ERKO mice. A, number of ACF/colon; B, number of MDF/colon for WT, αERKO and βERKO mice. The values are means (+SE). Statistical differences ...
Fig. 2
Topographical features of AOM-induced ACF and MDF presenting different multiplicity. A– C, ACF composed of 1 and 3 crypts (original magnification, ×20) and more than 4 crypts (original magnification, ×40) respectively as indicated ...
Table 1
ACF and MDF incidence in colons of AOM-treated WT and ERKO mice

Functional significance of Estrogen receptor β in the organization of colonic epithelium

Previously, it was reported that colons from βERKO mice presented greater number of proliferating cells and faster migration of labeled cells toward the surface of the colonic crypts when compared to colons from WT littermates (33). Furthermore, the colonic epithelium of βERKO mice also had shown fewer apoptotic cells and a significant decrease in expression of cytokeratin 20 (an epithelial differentiation marker), α-catenin and plectin (cellular adhesion molecules). These results suggested that ERβ might play a role in the maintenance of the colonic crypt architecture (33). In the present study, we observed that after AOM exposure the colons of βERKO mice presented an increased colonic thickness when compared to the colons of αERKO and WT mice. After AB-NR staining it was observed that in the colons of βERKO mice the crypt organization and morphology was completely lost in several areas, which did not occur in the colonic epithelium of the αERKO and WT littermates (Fig. 3). However, the scoring of MDF was possible in these mice due to significant color contrast between the red background stained with the NR, and the dark blue-spots composed of crypts full of mucin (Fig. 2D–F, Fig. 3 βERKO).

Fig. 3
Topographical features of the observed colonic epithelium of AOM-treated WT, αERKO and βERKO mice after AB-NR staining. The background epithelium stains in red (NR), while the colonic crypts appear as dark-blue spots due to the high production ...

Cell Proliferation and apoptosis in ERKO and WT mice exposed to AOM

In order to assess if the ER genotype would influence the pattern of proliferation and apoptosis in the colonic epithelium after AOM exposure, we determined Ki-67 expression by immunohistochemistry and apoptosis by TUNEL assay. As shown in Fig. 4A, no significant differences were found for Ki-67 expression amongst the three different genotypes (p > 0.05) (Fig 4C). The proliferation status was also assessed by the PCNA immunostaining, and although the number of proliferative cells was higher as compared to the Ki-67 immunostaining, no statistical differences were observed between the different genotypes (p > 0.05) (data not shown). The difference between PCNA and Ki-67 may be associated with an upregulation of PCNA in response to DNA injury associated with the AOM injections. Results from the TUNEL assay indicated that the colon sections from βERKO mice exhibited fewer apoptotic cells as compared to WT and αERKO (Fig. 4B). The quantitative analyses of the results showed a significant difference between WT vs. βERKO (p < 0.01) and αERKO vs. βERKO (p < 0.05) groups, with colon sections from βERKO mice expressing the least number of apoptotic cells (Fig. 4D). These findings suggest that the proliferation pattern in colonic crypts of ERKO mice does not differ from that of the WT mice after AOM exposure; however ERβ-deficiency seems to be associated with a significant decrease in apoptosis in the colon. This observation supports a potential pro-apoptotic role for ERβ in the colon and could comprise, in part, a possible explanation for the higher incidence of dysplastic crypts in the βERKO mice.

Fig. 4
A. Expression of Ki-67 in colon sections of WT and ERKO mice (original magnification, ×20). B. Apoptosis detection by TUNEL in WT and ERKO colonic sections (original magnification, ×40). Note that the images show the top of the colonic ...

Discussion

Several epidemiological studies have reported that women who use HRT are at a lower risk of developing colon cancer in comparison to non-users (2). Additionally, Weyant et al. demonstrated that endogenous estrogens protect against Apc-associated tumorigenesis and that tumor prevention by 17β-estradiol was associated with an up-regulation of ERβ and a down-regulation of ERα expression in the colonic enterocytes (34). More recently, an increased incidence of colon tumors was found in ER-deficient Min/+ mice relative to ER+/+Min/+ controls (35, 36). Based on these observations, estrogens have been linked to colon cancer protection through interaction with ERβ. However, very few in vivo studies have been carried out to provide evidence for the protective role of ERβ against colon carcinogenesis. In this study, we compared the incidence and multiplicity of AOM-induced ACF/MDF amongst the colons of WT, ERα and ERβ-KO mice. The results showed that βERKO mice demonstrate significantly higher incidence of ACF and MDF per colon (Fig. 1), as well as an increased number of “large” ACF/MDF per colon, which are considered to be more closely correlated to carcinogenesis outcome (Table 1). Furthermore, ERβ-deficient colons showed a decrease in apoptosis but not in proliferation rates relatively to normal and ERα-deficient colons (Fig. 4). These findings collectively suggest that ERβ may be involved in the maintenance of a proper balance between cell proliferation and cell death in the colon. In contrast, the ERα-deficient colons did not present any significant difference on ACF/MDF and “large” ACF/MDF occurrence, as well as, on proliferation and apoptosis levels when compared to WT controls. Additionally, the colons from βERKO mice were thicker and showed significant differences in the crypt architecture after AOM exposure when compared to WT and αERKO colonic epithelium (Fig. 3). These data support the notion of a protective role for ERβ in the maintenance and differentiation of colon epithelial cells and preventing colon carcinogenesis, whereas ERα appears to have a less prominent role in the development of colon cancer. Furthermore, ERβ may also be essential for the normal cellular growth and architectural structure of the colon, especially by controlling the rate of cell loss, playing a different biological function from ERα, as previously proposed by Wada-Hiraike et al (33). These results are congruent with the work of Weige et al. that showed that estradiol treatment reduces the incidence of premalignant lesions in the colon through an ERβ-mediated response (37).

Traditionally ACF are used as a biomarker for colon carcinogenesis, however in transgenic animals the scoring of ACF is often compromised due to the increased thickness of the colons in those animals (eg. Vitamin D receptor KO mice, 38). In such cases MDF may be useful as a biomarker for precancerous lesions. In conclusion, the results described in the present study indicate a possible protective role of ERβ on colon carcinogenesis. And the use of selective ERβ inducers might be an important approach for preventing and treating colon cancer.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Giovanna Caderni (University of Florence, Italy) for providing us with the protocol to identify MDF and offering her courteous help with any other related questions. We also thank Dr. Benya and Adam Blunier (University of Illinois, Chicago, IL) for providing access to the Tiffalyzer program for quantitative immunohistochemistry.

Grant support: This work was supported by the Business Development Agency - Global Portugal (AICEP), Fulbright Portugal Commission, and FCT (MCET and FSE - SFRH / BD / 33544 / 2008) (DS), NIH K01 CA103861 (GM), R01 CA121157 (RGM) and Research support provided by the Division of Intramural Research of NIEHS/NIH (KSK).

Footnotes

Part of this work has been previously reported at the American Association of Cancer Research meeting, San Diego 2008 and published in the Proceedings of AACR 2008.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. [PubMed]
2. Newcomb PA, Zheng Y, Chia VM, et al. Estrogen plus progestin use, microsatellite instability, and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Res. 2007;67:7534–7539. [PubMed]
3. Wernli KJ, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Potter JD, Newcomb PA. The Relationship between Gravidity and Parity and Colorectal Cancer Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:995–1001. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Bosetti C, Bravi F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Oral contraceptives and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:489–498. [PubMed]
5. Kabat GC, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, reproductive history and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:643–646. [PubMed]
6. McMichael AJ, Potter JD. Reproduction, endogenous and exogenous sex hormones, and colon cancer: a review and hypothesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980;65:1201–1207. [PubMed]
7. Kennelly R, Kavanagh DO, Hogan AM, Winter DC. Oestrogen and the colon: potential mechanisms for cancer prevention. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:385–391. [PubMed]
8. Couse JF, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor null mice: what have we learned and where will they lead us? Endocr Rev. 1999;20:358–417. [PubMed]
9. Hewitt SC, Korach KS. Estrogen receptors: structure, mechanisms and function. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2002;3:193–200. [PubMed]
10. Campbell-Thompson M, Lynch IJ, Bhardwaj B. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes and ERbeta isoforms in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2001;61:632–640. [PubMed]
11. Konstantinopoulos PA, Kominea A, Vandoros G, et al. Oestrogen receptor beta is abundantly expressed in normal colonic mucosa, but declines in colon adenocarcinoma paralleling the tumour's dedifferentiation. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1251–1258. [PubMed]
12. Bardin A, Boulle N, Lazennec G, Vignon F, Pujol P. Loss of ERbeta expression as a common step in estrogen-dependent tumor progression. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:537–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
13. Zhai RL, Wang GB, Cai KL, Tao KX, Xu F, Zhang WL, Wang ZY. Transcriptional inactivation of ERbeta gene is mediated by the induction of promoter hypermethylation in a rat colonic epithelial cell model. J Surg Res. 2009;155:306–310. [PubMed]
14. Tominaga K, Fujii S, Mukawa K, et al. Prediction of colorectal neoplasia by quantitative methylation analysis of estrogen receptor gene in nonneoplastic epithelium from patients with ulcerative colitis. Clinical Cancer Res. 2005;11:8880–8885. [PubMed]
15. Rody A, Holtrich U, Solbach C, et al. Methylation of estrogen receptor beta promoter correlates with loss of ER-beta expression in mammary carcinoma and is an early indication marker in premalignant lesions. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2005;12:903–916. [PubMed]
16. Hartman J, Edvardsson K, Lindberg K, et al. Tumor repressive functions of estrogen receptor beta in SW480 colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6100–6106. [PubMed]
17. Walker VR, Korach KS. Estrogen receptor knockout mice as a model for endocrine research. ILAR J. 2004;45:455–461. [PubMed]
18. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O. Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:11162–11166. [PubMed]
19. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, et al. Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:15677–15682. [PubMed]
20. Bird RP. Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen: preliminary findings. Cancer Lett. 1987;37:147–151. [PubMed]
21. Murillo G, Kosmeder JW, 2nd, Pezzuto JM, Mehta RG. Deguelin suppresses the formation of carcinogen-induced aberrant crypt foci in the colon of CF-1 mice. Int J Cancer. 2003;104:7–11. [PubMed]
22. Murillo G, Hirschelman WH, Ito A, et al. Zapotin, a phytochemical present in a Mexican fruit, prevents colon carcinogenesis. Nutr Cancer. 2007;57:28–37. [PubMed]
23. Caderni G, Femia AP, Giannini A, et al. Identification of mucin-depleted foci in the unsectioned colon of azoxymethane-treated rats: correlation with carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2388–2392. [PubMed]
24. Yoshimi N, Morioka T, Kinjo T, et al. Histological and immunohistochemical observations of mucin-depleted foci (MDF) stained with Alcian blue, in rat colon carcinogenesis induced with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine dihydrochloride. Cancer Sci. 2004;95:792–797. [PubMed]
25. Femia AP, Giannini A, Fazi M, et al. Identification of mucin depleted foci in the human colon. Cancer Prev Res (Phila Pa) 2008;1:562–567. [PubMed]
26. Mori H, Hata K, Yamada Y, Kuno T, Hara A. Significance and role of early-lesions in experimental colorectal carcinogenesis. Chem Biol Interact. 2005;155:1–9. [PubMed]
27. Femia AP, Dolara P, Caderni G. Mucin-depleted foci (MDF) in the colon of rats treated with azoxymethane (AOM) are useful biomarkers for colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:277–281. [PubMed]
28. Murillo G, Mehta RG. Chemoprevention of chemically-induced mammary and colon carcinogenesis by 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D5. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;97:129–136. [PubMed]
29. Femia AP, Dolara P, Giannini A, Salvadori M, Biggeri A, Caderni G. Frequent mutation of Apc gene in rat colon tumors and mucin-depleted foci, preneoplastic lesions in experimental colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2007;67:445–449. [PubMed]
30. Matusiak D, Murillo G, Carrol RE, Mehta RG, Benya RV. Expression of vitamin D receptor and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1α-hydroxylase in normal and malignant human colon. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:2370–2376. [PubMed]
31. Matkowskyj KA, Cox R, Jensen RT, Benya RV. Quantitative immunohistochemistry by measuring cumulative signal strength accurately measures protein concentration. J Histochem Cytochem. 2003a;51:205–214. [PubMed]
32. Matkowskyj K, Glover S, Benya RV. Quantitative immunohistochemistry: an algorithm measuring cumulative signal strength and receptor number. Microsc Anal. 2004;18:5–6.
33. Wada-Hiraike O, Imamov O, Hiraike H, et al. Role of estrogen receptor beta in colonic epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2959–2964. [PubMed]
34. Weyant MJ, Carothers AM, Mahmoud NN, et al. Reciprocal expression of ERalpha and ERbeta is associated with estrogen-mediated modulation of intestinal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2547–2551. [PubMed]
35. Cho NL, Javid SH, Carothers AM, Redston M, Bertagnolli MM. Estrogen receptors alpha and beta are inhibitory modifiers of Apc-dependent tumorigenesis in the proximal colon of Min/+ mice. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2366–2372. [PubMed]
36. Cleveland AG, Oikarinen SI, Bynoté KK, et al. Disruption of estrogen receptor signaling enhances intestinal neoplasia in Apc(Min/+) mice. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1581–1590. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Weige CC, Allred KF, Allred CD. Estradiol alters cell growth in nonmalignant colonocytes and reduces the formation of preneoplastic lesions in the colon. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9118–9124. [PubMed]
38. Renouf M, Murillo G, Mehta RG, Welsh J. VDR ablation alters basal gene expression and exacerbates AOM-induced aberrant crypt foci in colon of C57 female mice. The FASEB J. 2007;21 856.6.