PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brcKargerHomeAlertsResources
 
Breast Care (Basel). 2010 April; 5(2): 86–90.
Published online 2010 April 9. doi:  10.1159/000298962
PMCID: PMC2931041

NHERF1/EBP50 in Breast Cancer: Clinical Perspectives

Summary

Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1) is a postsynaptic density 95/disc-large/zona occludens (PDZ) domain-containing protein that recruits membrane receptors/transporters and cytoplasmic signaling proteins into functional complexes. NHERF1 expression has been demonstrated to be altered in breast cancer, but its role in mammary cancerogenesis and progression remains still undefined. In this paper, we review what is known on the pathological role and the potential clinical application of NHERF1 protein in breast cancer. Recent evidence shows that an increased cytoplasmic expression of NHERF1 suggests a key role of its localization/compartmentalization in defining cancerogenesis, progression, and invasion. NHERF1 overexpression is associated with increasing tumor cytohistological grade, aggressive clinical behavior, unfavorable prognosis, and increased tumor hypoxia. Moreover, NHERF1 co-localizes with the oncogenic receptor HER2/neu in HER2/neu-overexpressing carcinoma and in distant metastases. These data make NHERF1 also a potential candidate of clinical relevance for anti-HER2/neu therapy.

Key Words: Breast cancer, NHERF1/EBP50, HER2/neu

Introduction

Breast cancer is still a major cause of death in women. In fact, although the increasing body of knowledge in the field of molecular biology has allowed for a better understanding of the biology of breast cancer, the search is still in progress for new factors that would make it possible to personalize therapeutic approaches and optimize the employment of targeted therapies. Today, several biological characteristics such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), proliferation markers, and HER2/neu expression are considered useful biomarkers for a better selection of candidates for various therapeutic approaches [1], but their clinical utilization is often not easy because of contradictory characteristics when determined in the single patient and suboptimal performance.

The biomolecular complexity and pathological heterogeneity of breast cancer are the reasons for the varied clinical outcome and response to therapy of breast cancer patients, stressing the need for further studies on molecular pathways involved in cell signaling, controlling cell growth, death, and tumor differentiation. Signaling pathways are organized into macromolecular assemblies by scaffolding proteins containing PDZ modular interaction domains that facilitate the association of multiple target proteins and permit the creation of new tumor-specific pathways to drive the subverted cellular functions exhibited by tumor cells. One class of modular domains is the postsynaptic density 95/disc-large/zona occludens (PDZ) domain that associates with specific carboxyl-terminal motifs on target proteins and can also oligomerize with other PDZ domains to enhance the scaffolding function [2, 3]. In particular, human Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 (NHERF1), initially identified as ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM)-binding phosphoprotein 50 (EBP50), is a protein comprising 358 amino acids and containing 2 tandem PDZ domains followed by a carboxyterminal ERM-binding region that recruits membrane receptors/transporters and cytoplasmic signaling proteins into functional complexes important for the coordination of multiple signaling pathways such as those depending on tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors [4].

Different methodologies for the analysis of NHERF1 characteristics in human tissues have been applied, either by combining immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization [5], or immunofluorescence with Western blot (WB) analysis of the tumor samples [6]. These studies showed a wide distribution of NHERF1 in normal human tissues, and in particular those containing polarized epithelia [7,8,9]. Here, we review the available data on the role of NHERF1 in the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer, stressing those aspects of potential clinical application.

NHERF1 in Breast Cancerogenesis and Progression

NHERF1 is a candidate tumor suppressor gene located at chromosome loci 17q25.1 [7, 10, 11]. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the NHERF1 gene locus (SLC9A3R1) occurs frequently in human ovarian cancer and breast cancer, in the latter in more than 50% of tumors [12,13,14]. Conversely, LOH at the NHERF1 locus is not frequent in other types of human cancer, supporting the hypothesis that NHERF1 is specifically targeted during breast tumorigenesis [11]. Protein expression has been reported to be altered in several cancers such as hepatocellular carcinomas [15] and in schwannoma [16]; however, the most representative data concerns altered expression in breast cancer samples [17] in which significant relationships with clinical pathological characteristics of the tumor have been also reported [5, 6, 18]. By analyzing NHERF1 protein expression in human breast tumors and contiguous noninvolved tissue from the same patient, Cardone et al. [6] demonstrated that NHERF1 is overexpressed in all human breast tumors with respect to contiguous normal lobules. Even more interestingly, Mangia et al. [19] described a significant change in subcellular distribution of NHERF1 moving from less to more aggressive breast cancers. Interestingly, in tumor cells from either primary or metastatic sites, NHERF1 protein was mostly localized in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells while membranous NHERF1 immunoreactivity was present especially at the luminal aspects of normal breast epithelial cells [8]. Furthermore, the cytoplasmic/membranous NHERF1 expression ratio (fig. (fig.1)1) progressively increased in tumors cells from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to primary invasive and metastatic tissues. The altered subcellular compartmentalization of NHERF1 in DCIS seems to suggest that it could play an early pathogenetic role in breast cancer progression (fig. (fig.2).2). Based on these findings, Georgescu et al. [20] hypothesized that NHERF1 could act as a tumor suppressor when localized at the apical level of the membrane, and as an oncogenic protein when localized in the cytoplasm. Indeed, in comedocarcinomas, subluminal membranous immunoreactivity of NHERF1 was present. Comedo-type DCIS is a breast cancer characterized by an important central necrosis [21] caused by marked tumor cells proliferation and hypoxia [22, 23]. The presence of NHERF1 in hypoxic tumors such as comedocarcinomas and the strong correlation with hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1a), a marker of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment [24, 25], suggest that NHERF1 expression could be related to the tumor metabolic microenvironment which has been shown to play an important role in driving metastatic progression [26, 27].

Fig. 1
Cellular distribution of NHERF1 in breast tissues. Cytoplasmic/membranous NHERF1 protein expression ratio evaluated in normal breast tissue, carcinoma in situ, invasive tumor, synchronous metastatic lymph nodes, and metachronous distant metastasis tissues ...
Fig. 2
Immunohistochemical analysis of NHERF1 protein in breast cancer. NHERF1 expression in A morphologically normal tissue is present as apical membranous reactivity; B in carcinoma in situ NHERF1 immunoreactivity is localized in the cytoplasmic subcellular ...

Importantly, it was observed that NHERF1 protein expression is increased by hypoxia, and that this increase stimulates the activity of the Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1), which results in a decrease in extracellular pH [6]. This provides, for the first time, a direct functional link between the hypoxic and acidic tumor microenvironments and their integration to drive increased tumor cell aggressiveness. Preliminary data from our laboratories show that analogous to HIF-1a [24, 25] this hypoxia-driven increase is due to an inhibition of the 26S proteasome during hypoxia. Interestingly, NHERF1 binds to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in an EGF-dependent manner to stabilize EGFR in the membrane and increase its downstream signaling, and, in this way, closes a positive-feedback loop that integrates local growth factor and hypoxic signals to further drive metastatic growth through the up-regulation of the NHE1 and subsequent acidification of the extracellular environment [26, 27].

NHERF1 Correlation with Clinicopathological Characteristics

NHERF1 protein expression was analyzed with respect to the main clinicopathological characteristics of women with breast cancer (table (table1),1), such as age, menopausal status, tumor size, proliferation index (MIB1), presence of regional nodal metastases (node status), ER and PR status, and tumor cytohistological differentiation grade [5, 6, 18].

Table 1
Clinicopathological association of NHERF1 protein expression levels in human breast tumor tissues [17]

In relation to hormone receptors, it is noteworthy that NHERF1 expression is present in 90–93% of ER-positive breast tumors while being completely absent in the 62–71% of ER-negative tumors [5, 8]. In any case, tumor NHERF1 protein expression levels were reported as directly related with increasing ER levels in ER-positive tumors. This evidence biologically interprets the results of experiments describing the NHERF1 gene as transcriptionally regulated by estrogen [28, 29]. Moreover, NHERF1 expression significantly increased with increasing tumor cytohistological grade and with a poorer prognosis as defined by Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) [30, 31]. This prognostic index, based on tumor size, tumor grade, and nodal status, is useful in predicting outcome in patients with operable breast cancer. Using the NPI index, it was observed that tissue NHERF1 protein expression was significantly higher in cytohistological undif-ferentiated tumors (G3) compared to differentiated tumors (G1-G2) and in tumors with a worse prognosis compared with those with a better prognosis. Interestingly, this association was also present when NHERF1 expression was evaluated by WB in peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients; in fact, in a preliminary series of subjects, lymphocyte NHERF1 expression was significantly higher in patients with breast cancer with respect to that in healthy subjects. Indeed, a strong association between lymphocyte NHERF1 expression and ER expression in ER-positive tumors was also observed, in line with previous reports [5, 6, 8]. Altogether, these findings seem to underline a possible involvement of both the innate and the adaptive immune system in breast cancer etiology [32, 33].

NHERF1 and HER2/neu: Interacting Partners

As a scaffolding protein, NHERF1 recruits membrane and cytoplasmic proteins into functional complexes through its PDZ domains. NHERF1 is associated with a number of G proteincoupled receptors, ion channels, and growth factor TK receptors, such as the platelet-derived growth factor receptor [34] and the EGFR [35], which promote dimerization and activation of mitogenic signals [34, 36]. These functions have been confirmed in the breast cancer model with demonstration of a critical role for these adaptor proteins in TK signal transduction [37] and growth regulation [17]. In particular, it is known that NHERF1 binds to the EGFR in normal and tumor cells to regulate cell trafficking and sensitivity to drugs [4, 35, 38]. Moreover, the interaction with HER2/neu has been deeply studied. In normal human breast cells, NHERF1 localized at the apical membrane of normal epithelial cells, and HER2/ neu maintained its physiological ability to respond to different signals. In HER2/neu-overexpressing DCIS, the receptor co-localized with NHERF1 at membrane level; conversely, in invasive tumors, synchronous metastatic lymph nodes, and metachronous distant metastases, NHERF1 becomes mostly cytoplasmic in cells of the tumor nests that are no longer polarized [19].

Conclusions and Perspectives

In conclusion, human NHERF1 is a scaffolding protein that recruits membrane receptors/transporters and cytoplasmic signaling proteins into functional complexes, important for the coordination of multiple signaling pathways such as those depending on TK receptors [4]. Its subcellular localization is altered in breast cancer with a predominant cytoplasmic expression. Its overexpression is associated with aggressive clinical parameters, unfavorable prognosis, and increased tumor hypoxia. Moreover, NHERF1 is overexpressed in circulating lymphocytes of breast cancer patients and associated with the same clinical parameters as the tumor. In addition, NHERF1 is strongly related to HER2/neu expression in invasive tumors and distant metastases. As a scaffolding protein, it is able to create new signaling pathways driving the subverted cellular functions exhibited by tumor cells; and as it binds to HER2/ neu, NHERF1 could potentially address 3 different clinical perspectives: i) be a new predictive marker for better a priori identification of patients/tumors that will respond to the treatment; ii) provide a way of increasing the sensitivity to trastuzumab in some non-responders, possibly by increasing its residence time in the plasma membrane and, therefore, its availability to trastuzumab; iii) be a novel target that could potentially be used in combined therapy with trastuzumab to increase its efficiency and/or transform non-responders into responders.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Acknowledgement

Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health, ‘Programma Integrato Oncologia (PIO) 2007’.

References

1. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, Halberg F, Somerfield MR, Davidson NE, American Society of Clinical Oncology American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5091–5097. [PubMed]
2. Nourry C, Grant SG, Borg JP. PDZ domain proteins: plug and play! Sci STKE. 2003;2003:RE7. [PubMed]
3. Brône B, Eggermont J. PDZ proteins retain and regulate membrane transporters in polarized epithelial cell membranes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;288:C20–29. [PubMed]
4. Weinman EJ, Hall RA, Friedman PA, Liu-Chen LY, Shenolikar S. The association of NHERF adaptor proteins with g protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;68:491–505. [PubMed]
5. Song J, Bai J, Yang W, Gabrielson EW, Chan DW, Zhang Z. Expression and clinicopathological significance of oestrogen-responsive ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 in breast cancer. Histopathology. 2007;51:40–53. [PubMed]
6. Cardone RA, Bellizzi A, Busco G, Weinman EJ, Dell'Aquila ME, Casavola V, Azzariti A, Mangia A, Paradiso A, Reshkin SJ. The NHERF1 PDZ2 domain regulates PKA-RhoA-p38-mediated NHE1 activation and invasion in breast tumor cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1768–1780. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Reczek D, Berryman M, Bretscher A. Identification of EBP50: a PDZ-containing phosphoprotein that associates with members of the ezrin-radixinmoesin family. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:169–179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Stemmer-Rachamimov AO, Wiederhold T, Nielsen GP, James M, Pinney-Michalowski D, Roy JE, Cohen WA, Ramesh V, Louis DN. NHERF, a merlin-interacting protein, is primarily expressed in luminal epithelia, proliferative endometrium, and estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:57–62. [PubMed]
9. Fouassier L, Duan CY, Feranchak AP, Yun CH, Sutherland E, Simon F, Fitz JG, Doctor RB. Ezrinradixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 is expressed at the apical membrane of rat liver epithelia. Hepatology. 2001;33:166–176. [PubMed]
10. Weinman EJ, Steplock D, Wang Y, Shenolikar S. Characterization of a protein cofactor that mediates protein kinase A regulation of the renal brush border membrane Na(+)-H+ exchanger. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2143–2149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Dai JL, Wang L, Sahin AA, Broemeling LD, Schutte M, Pan Y. NHERF (Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor) gene mutations in human breast cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:8681–8687. [PubMed]
12. Plummer SJ, Adams L, Simmons JA, Casey G. Localization of a growth suppressor activity in MCF7 breast cancer cells to chromosome 17q24-q25. Oncogene. 1997;14:2339–2345. [PubMed]
13. Orsetti B, Courjal F, Cuny M, Rodriguez C, Theillet C. 17q21-q25 aberrations in breast cancer: combined allelotyping and CGH analysis reveals 5 regions of allelic imbalance among which two correspond to DNA amplification. Oncogene. 1999;18:6262–6270. [PubMed]
14. Presneau N, Dewar K, Forgetta V, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM, Tonin PN. Loss of heterozygosity and transcriptome analyses of a 1.2 Mb candidate ovarian cancer tumor suppressor locus region at 17q25.1-q25.2. Mol Carcinog. 2005;43:141–154. [PubMed]
15. Shibata T, Chuma M, Kokubu A, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S. EBP50, a beta-catenin-associating protein, enhances Wnt signaling and is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2003;38:178–186. [PubMed]
16. Fraenzer JT, Pan H, Minimo L, Jr, Smith GM, Knauer D, Hung G. Overexpression of the NF2 gene inhibits schwannoma cell proliferation through promoting PDGFR degradation. Int J Oncol. 2003;23:1493–1500. [PubMed]
17. Voltz JW, Weinman EJ, Shenolikar S. Expanding the role of NHERF, a PDZ-domain containing protein adapter, to growth regulation. Oncogene. 2001;20:6309–6314. [PubMed]
18. Schindelmann S, Windisch J, Grundmann R, Kreienberg R, Zeillinger R, Deissler H. Expression profiling of mammary carcinoma cell lines: correlation of in vitro invasiveness with expression of CD24. Tumor Biol. 2002;23:139–145. [PubMed]
19. Mangia A, Chiriatti A, Bellizzi A, Malfettone A, Stea B, Zito FA, Reshkin SJ, Simone G, Paradiso A. Biological role of NHERF1 protein expression in breast cancer. Histopathology. 2009;55:600–608. [PubMed]
20. Georgescu MM, Morales FC, Molina JR, Hayashi Y. Roles of NHERF1/EBP50 in cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2008;8:459–468. [PubMed]
21. Moriya T, Silverberg SG. Intraductal carcinoma (ductal carcinoma in situ) of the breast. A comparison of pure noninvasive tumors with those including different proportions of infiltrating carcinoma. Cancer. 1994;74:2972–2978. [PubMed]
22. Inouye T, Inokuchi M, Shimizu K, Abe K. Interstitial vascular reaction of naturally occurring mam-marry adenocarcinoma in old C3H/HeJ female mice. Jikken Dobutsu. 1984;33:151–157. [PubMed]
23. Favaro E, Nardo G, Persano L, Masiero M, Moserle L, Zamarchi R, Rossi E, Esposito G, Plebani M, Sattler U, Mann T, Mueller-Klieser W, Ciminale V, Amadori A, Indraccolo S. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha inactivation unveils a link between tumor cell metabolism and hypoxia-induced cell death. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1186–1201. [PubMed]
24. Covello KL, Simon MC. HIFs, hypoxia, and vascular development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2004;62:37–54. [PubMed]
25. Zhong H, De Marzo AM, Laughner E, Lim M, Hilton DA, Zagzag D, Buechler P, Isaacs WB, Semenza GL, Simons JW. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha in common human cancers and their metastases. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5830–5835. [PubMed]
26. Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Karczmar GS, Bhujwalla ZM. MRI of the tumor microenvironment. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:430–450. [PubMed]
27. Cardone RA, Casavola V, Reshkin SJ. The role of disturbed pH dynamics and the Na+/H+ exchanger in metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:786–795. [PubMed]
28. Ediger TR, Kraus WL, Weinman EJ, Katzenellenbogen BS. Estrogen receptor regulation of the Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor. Endocrinology. 1999;140:2976–2982. [PubMed]
29. Harrington WR, Sheng S, Barnett DH, Petz LN, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS. Activities of estrogen receptor alpha- and beta-selective ligands at diverse estrogen responsive gene sites mediating transactivation or transrepression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;206:13–22. [PubMed]
30. Hermanek P, Sobin LH, editors. UICC TNM: Classification of Malignant Tumours. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1988.
31. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 2002;41:154–161. [PubMed]
32. Bereznaya NM, Kirnasovskaya EA, Vinnichuk YD, Belova OB, Lukyanova NY. Expression of CD40 by the cells of benign and malignant breast tumors and antitumor action of autologous lymphocytes against chemoresistant and chemosensitive tumors. Exp Oncol. 2008;30:295–299. [PubMed]
33. Standish LJ, Sweet ES, Novack J, Wenner CA, Bridge C, Nelson A, Martzen M, Torkelson C. Breast cancer and the immune system. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2008;6:158–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Maudsley S, Zamah AM, Rahman N, Blitzer JT, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ, Hall RA. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor association with Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor potentiates receptor activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8352–8363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Lazar CS, Cresson CM, Lauffenburger DA, Gill GN. The Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor stabilizes epidermal growth factor receptors at the cell surface. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:5470–5480. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Cao TT, Deacon HW, Reczek D, Bretscher A, von Zastrow M. A kinase-regulated PDZ-domain interaction controls endocytic sorting of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. Nature. 1999;401:286–290. [PubMed]
37. Weinman EJ, Steplock D, Wade JB, Shenolikar S. Ezrin binding domain-deficient NHERF attenuates cAMP-mediated inhibition of Na(+)/H(+) exchange in OK cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;281:F374–380. [PubMed]
38. Pan Y, Weinman EJ, Dai JL. Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 inhibits platelet-derived growth factor signalling in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Breast Care are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers