Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of brainInstructions to AuthorsSubcribeAboutFree EditorialsBrain
Brain. 2010 September; 133(9): 2603–2611.
Published online 2010 August 26. doi:  10.1093/brain/awq192
PMCID: PMC2929334

Genetic variation influences glutamate concentrations in brains of patients with multiple sclerosis


Glutamate is the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. Appropriate transmission of nerve impulses through glutamatergic synapses is required throughout the brain and forms the basis of many processes including learning and memory. However, abnormally high levels of extracellular brain glutamate can lead to neuroaxonal cell death. We have previously reported elevated glutamate levels in the brains of patients suffering from multiple sclerosis. Here two complementary analyses to assess the extent of genomic control over glutamate levels were used. First, a genome-wide association analysis in 382 patients with multiple sclerosis using brain glutamate concentration as a quantitative trait was conducted. In a second approach, a protein interaction network was used to find associated genes within the same pathway. The top associated marker was rs794185 (P < 6.44 × 10−7), a non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism within the gene sulphatase modifying factor 1. Our pathway approach identified a module composed of 70 genes with high relevance to glutamate biology. Individuals carrying a higher number of associated alleles from genes in this module showed the highest levels of glutamate. These individuals also showed greater decreases in N-acetylaspartate and in brain volume over 1 year of follow-up. Patients were then stratified by the amount of annual brain volume loss and the same approach was performed in the ‘high’ (n = 250) and ‘low’ (n = 132) neurodegeneration groups. The association with rs794185 was highly significant in the group with high neurodegeneration. Further, results from the network-based pathway analysis remained largely unchanged even after stratification. Results from these analyses indicated that variance in the activity of neurochemical pathways implicated in neurodegeneration is explained, at least in part, by the inheritance of common genetic polymorphisms. Spectroscopy-based imaging provides a novel quantitative endophenotype for genetic association studies directed towards identifying new factors that contribute to the heterogeneity of clinical expression of multiple sclerosis.

Keywords: glutamate receptor, genetics, multiple sclerosis


l-Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), acting through both ligand-gated ion channels and G-protein-coupled receptors. Activation of these receptors is responsible for basal excitatory synaptic transmission and many forms of synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, which underlie the processes of learning and memory. Excess glutamate in the synaptic space triggers a toxic cascade that results in neuroaxonal injury and death in a broad range of disorders (Pitt et al., 2000; Ouardouz et al., 2009). Glutamate toxicity is also a contributing aetiological factor in multiple sclerosis (OMIM #126200) (Stys, 2005; Dong et al., 2009), a common neuroinflammatory disease affecting young adults. Glutamate concentrations are elevated both in acute lesions and in normal-appearing white matter of patients with multiple sclerosis (Srinivasan et al., 2005) consistent with a potential role in the neurodegeneration underlying disease progression (De Stefano et al., 2007). Using magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, it is now possible to measure in vivo glutamate levels in the brain with precision (Srinivasan et al., 2006). The aim of this study was to test for associations between common variants in the human genome and differences in glutamate concentrations in normal-appearing brain matter of patients with multiple sclerosis.

In the last few years, nearly a dozen non-human leucocyte antigen genes have been associated with this disease including IL7R (CD127), IL2RA (CD25), CD58 and CLEC16A (Hafler et al., 2007; ANZgene, 2009; Baranzini et al., 2009b). However, the small effect of most associations demands very large studies to reach adequate statistical power (Sawcer, 2008). An additional challenging aspect in the effort to identify new genetic associations in diseases like multiple sclerosis has been the lack of disease-specific quantitative traits that can be related to DNA variants in a given individual. Such an approach has been successfully used in conditions like hypertension [variation in blood pressure (Cowley, 2006)], erythrocyte phenotypes (Ganesh et al., 2009) and circulating fibrinogen levels (Dehghan et al., 2009). Recent studies relating N-acetylaspartate (NAA) (a marker of neuroaxonal damage) and HLA-DRB1*1501 allele status, and quantitative measures of grey matter density, volume and cortical thickness with genome-wide DNA variants, highlight the potential benefits of integrating genetic and imaging data to illuminate new aspects in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases (Okuda et al., 2009; Shen et al.). We hypothesized that variation in brain glutamate concentrations measured by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy could be used as a quantitative trait and combined with available high-density genotyping data to identify genetic contributions to glutamate-mediated toxicity in multiple sclerosis.

Material and methods

Study participants and genetic data

This study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). After signing appropriate informed consents, all participants were recruited at the UCSF Multiple Sclerosis Centre using established inclusion criteria (Baranzini et al., 2009b). Baseline clinical characteristics of this patient data set are listed in Table 1. Genotypes were extracted from a recently completed and reported genome-wide association study (GWAS) using the Sentrix® HumanHap550 BeadChip (Baranzini et al., 2009b).

Table 1
Cohort characteristics

MRI data acquisition and brain volume measurement

A high-resolution inversion recovery spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted isotropic volumetric sequence [3D inversion re-covery spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in steady-state (IRSPGR), 1 x 1 x 1 mm3, 180 slices] was acquired for brain volume measurements (echo time/repetition time/interval time = 2/7/400 ms, flip angle = 15°, 256 × 256 × 180 matrix, 240 × 240 × 180 mm3 field of view, number of excitations =). Annual per cent whole brain volume change was calculated by structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy, a fully automated method of longitudinal (temporal) brain change analysis (Smith et al., 2002).

Spectroscopic data acquisition and quantification

Glutamate and NAA concentrations were measured in 382 patients at study entry using two-dimensional echo time-averaged proton spectroscopic imaging. Technical details of this imaging pulse sequence have been reported elsewhere (Srinivasan et al., 2006). The spectroscopic data were acquired on a 3T GE Excite scanner (GE Healthcare Technologies, Waukesha, WI, USA) using an 8-channel phased coil immediately following the acquisition of the anatomical images and prior to the administration of the contrast agent. The resulting coil combination data were echo time-averaged and the metabolic concentration of glutamate and NAA were obtained using the LCmodel quantification algorithm and corrected for T1 (glutamate, NAA) and T2 (NAA) relaxation times using similar methods described elsewhere (Ratiney et al., 2007). Concentration estimations of ‘pure’ grey and white matter metabolites were derived from segmented high-resolution T1-weighted images using a hidden Markov random field model with expectation maximization. By modelling the glutamate and NAA concentrations and magnetic resonance relaxation parameters as a linear function of percentage of white matter content, ‘pure’ grey matter and white matter glutamate and NAA concentrations were extrapolated from the end points of the linear fit.

Association analysis

An association analysis was performed using the linear regression option in PLINK (Purcell et al., 2007). Disease duration, age of onset and HLA-DRB1*1501 status were used as covariates. We only report association P-values corresponding to additive effects of allele dosage.

Module (sub-network) analysis

Systematic module searches on a highly curated protein interaction network were conducted as described (Supplementary Fig. 1) (Baranzini et al., 2009a). Briefly, each gene product in the network was assigned a number corresponding to the P-value of the most strongly associated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for that gene with the trait (only P-values < 0.05 were considered). Next, the Cytoscape ( plugin jActive modules (Ideker et al., 2002) was used to identify groups of interacting gene products that were also associated with in vivo glutamate. jActive modules converts P-values into z-scores and uses a greedy algorithm to grow a sub-network (or module) from a random seed node by sequentially incorporating its neighbours in the protein interaction network (PIN). The algorithm then returns the smallest possible module that includes gene products with the most significant associations. A significance (z) score is assigned to each reported sub-network after evaluation of 10 000 random networks of similar size. Only modules with a score >3 and of size >5 were considered.

To evaluate whether the significant modules obtained were biologically meaningful, we employed a text-mining strategy by performing automated PubMed searches with each gene product in the module and the terms ‘glutamate’ OR ‘glutamic acid’. An aggregate value, named the domain knowledge score (DKS) was then computed by adding up the number of articles retrieved for all gene products in a given module and dividing it by the number of gene products in the module. To avoid introducing bias due to a single well-characterized molecule, we set a limit of 10 articles per gene.

Computation of genetic scores

The risk allele for each associated SNP was defined as the allele showing the highest frequency among patients with high baseline in vivo glutamate levels. For a module of N genes, each patient was assigned a genetic score (from 0 to 2*N) corresponding to the total number of risk alleles carried at the N loci. Scores were normalized between 0 and 1 to allow comparison of networks of different sizes. This genetic score was correlated with other magnetic resonance spectroscopic metrics such as NAA concentration change over time and brain atrophy (per cent whole brain volume change values from structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy).

Computation of expected correlations by simulation

Given three random variables x, y and z, with the following non-zero correlations:

equation image

we expect the correlation between x and z to be distributed normally with mean

equation image

To assign significance to an observed rxz given rxy and ryz, we performed a simulation. One thousand random sets of vectors x, y and z were constructed such that rxy and ryz matched the observed correlations in our data set. rxz was calculated in these random sets and a normal distribution was created. The observed rxz was compared with this normal distribution to assign significance.


Glutamate levels were measured in vivo in both the normal-appearing white and grey matter of 382 patients with multiple sclerosis using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Although at the time of the study most patients had a diagnosis of relapse–remitting multiple sclerosis (n = 279) or clinically isolated syndrome (n = 58), all types of the disease were represented in this analysis. Table 1 lists the demographic details of the cohort alongside other radiological and clinical parameters. Approximately 500 000 genotypes were available for each study participant (Baranzini et al., 2009b) and were used to perform a genome-wide association analysis using brain glutamate concentrations as an endophenotypic continuous trait (Fig. 1). The top associated marker was rs794185 (P < 6.44 × 10−7), a SNP in chromosome 3p26.2 that maps to intron 6 of the gene coding for sulphatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1). Mutations in SUMF1 lead to multiple sulphatase deficiency (MIM 272200), a lysosomal storage disorder. DNA variants in this gene may indirectly regulate extracellular glutamate by altering the activity of steroid sulphatases (Shirakawa et al., 2005; Gibbs et al., 2006; Valenzuela et al., 2008). A region spanning ~4 Mb in chromosome 7 and containing 11 SNPs in HDAC9, 5 SNPs in CDCA7L and 6 SNPs in DRCTNNB was found to be modestly associated (P-values between 10−4 and 10−5). The top 20 associated SNPs are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Figure 1
Genome-wide scan for allele frequency differences related to in vivo glutamate concentration in multiple sclerosis brains. (A) P-values from the linear regression with glutamate concentration, controlled by disease duration, age of onset and DRB1 status. ...

To maximize the probability of identifying true associated genes, we used a PIN-based analysis as previously described (Baranzini et al., 2009a). In this method, evidence of genetic association is combined with evidence of physical interaction of the respective gene products. Thirty-four modules were found to be significantly associated with in vivo glutamate concentration. Due to the nature of the searches, significant overlap in the composition of modules is expected. In order to assess the relative importance of these modules, several criteria were considered. First, a literature search was performed to determine the relevance of each of the component genes to glutamate biology. Next, their association with related phenotypes such as NAA decline and brain atrophy change were measured. Module 14 was the top scoring module across all these criteria. This module was composed of 70 genes and included three ionotropic glutamate receptors (GRID2, GRIK2 and GRIK5), 17 anchoring proteins required for glutamate receptor and transporter organization (AKAP5, DLG2, DLG4, SHANK2, PRKCA, LRRC7, PKP4, CTNND2, CDH2, CDH5, DSC3, ARVCF, NLGN4X, DLGAP1, CASK, CASKIN, ACTN2), two axon guidance molecules (DAB1, DAB2) and three key regulators of glutamatergic synaptic activity (ERBB4, PTK2B and PARK2) (Fig. 2). In addition, seven members of the TGF-β signalling pathway (SMAD1, SMAD2 SMAD3, SMAD6, SMURF1, ERBB2IP and ACVR1) were also members of this network.

Figure 2
Module 14. A graphical representation of the overall highest scoring module from the protein interaction network. Circles represent proteins and lines represent interactions among them. Proteins are coloured according to their relationship to glutamate. ...

To assess the biological relevance of reported modules a text-mining strategy was implemented by performing automated PubMed searches with each of the component genes of all identified modules and the term ‘glutamate’ OR ‘glutamic acid’. The aggregate number of articles found for all genes in a given module was recorded as its DKS. The top associated genes (by P-value) found in the PIN (whether they interact or not) had higher DKS than the top associated genes not found in the PIN, perhaps indicating that genes in the PIN are overall better annotated. However, the DKS of Module 14 (and that of all other modules, data not shown) was significantly higher than that of both the top genes in the PIN and the overall top associated genes (Fig. 3). These results support our hypothesis that the network-based approach identifies biologically related genes.

Figure 3
Domain knowledge scores. Mean DKSs were calculated for genes in Module 14 (black bar), and for the top associated genes from the same protein network (whether they interact or not) (grey bar). Also, the mean DKS of the top associated genes from the original ...

We then tested the association of each module with selected relevant MRI-based metrics (Fig. 4). To this end, a module-specific genetic score was computed for each patient. The score was derived from the number of risk alleles carried at each gene represented in the module. We reasoned that if glutamate concentration was affected by genomic variants, then individuals with the highest glutamate levels would show the highest number of associated alleles in the module. As predicted, patients with the highest glutamate levels in grey matter were more likely to display the highest genetic scores (for Module 14: R2 = 42%) (Fig. 4A). While this correlation was expected because genetic scores were derived from the regression with the trait, the highly significant P-value (2.58 × 10−29) indicates that most, if not all, of the 70 genes in the module contribute to the phenotype. Interestingly, we observed a significant correlation between the rate of NAA decline in grey matter over the first year after glutamate measurements and the module-specific genetic score (R2 = 6.3%, P < 10−4) (Fig. 4B). Although a relationship between these two variables was anticipated (expected R2 = 4.4%) due to the existing correlation between glutamate and NAA levels (R2 = 10.4%, P < 10−7), the correlation between genetic scores and NAA decline is higher than expected. Simulations with artificial data sets and conditional regression analysis were conducted to assess the statistical significance of these additional correlations but were not conclusive, possibly reflecting lack of power due to a moderate sample size and the relatively short follow-up time. Similar results were obtained when NAA decline in white matter was considered (R2 = 3.2%, P < 0.007). Finally, we also observed a significant correlation between brain atrophy over the first year and the module-specific genetic score (observed: R2 = 1.2% P < 0.05; expected R2 = 0.14%) (Fig. 4C). Correlations between glutamate-based genetic score and the multiple sclerosis severity score (computed over 2 and 3 years) did not reach significance.

Figure 4
Correlation between glutamate genetic score and relevant variables. (A) Correlation of glutamate genetic scores with grey matter glutamate concentration. (B) Correlation of genetic scores with NAA change over 1 year. Genetic scores explain more variance ...

As described in Table 1, the data set included patients of all disease subtypes and presumably with variable degrees of neurodegeneration. It is conceivable that the DNA variants associated with glutamate concentration will have a stronger effect in patients with more neurodegeneration, as evidenced by MRI. To evaluate this hypothesis, we stratified patients based on brain atrophy (i.e. a surrogate of neurodegeneration) and repeated the entire analysis in each group. Patients showing at least 0.2% decline (−0.2% percent whole brain volume change) in structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy at two or more times during a 3-year follow-up period were considered as the group with ‘high’ neurodegeneration (n = 250), while the remaining 132 individuals were defined as the group with ‘low’ neurodegeneration. A decline of 0.2% or more was observed in normal ageing from 48 healthy controls scanned annually using the same 3T scanner (D. Pelletier, unpublished data). The top 20 associated variants in the high neurodegeneration group are shown in Supplementary Table 2. It is noteworthy that the top hit from the original GWAS performed in all patients (rs794185 in SUMF1, P < 6.44 × 10−7) was the second-most significant marker in the new analysis (P < 9.92 × 10−6). In comparison, the same SNP ranked 329 987 in the GWAS with the low neurodegeneration group (the top 20 variants are shown in Supplementary Table 3), suggesting that most of the statistical significance of the SUMF1 association in the full data set derives from the group of patients with high neurodegeneration.

We then performed the network-based analysis to search for modules enriched in modestly associated variants within functionally related genes. Like in the original GWAS, several networks (i.e. 23) with different degrees of overlapping were significantly enriched in genes associated with glutamate concentrations. Of these, eight networks were also functionally related to glutamate in the group with high neurodegeneration as determined by their DKS. Whereas a similar number of significant modules were found for the group with low neurodegeneration (i.e. 30), only one of them was functionally related to glutamate.

The top associated module in the group with high neurodegeneration was composed of 55 genes (Supplementary Fig. 2) significantly enriched in glutamate biology (Supplementary Fig. 3). Although computing the overlap between any two networks is currently a subject of much debate in graphic theory (nets could be compared on the basis of shared nodes, edges or half a dozen network parameters such as connectivity distribution, clustering coefficient, etc.), a rough measure is to count the number of nodes in common. When compared to the network obtained with data from the original GWAS, we identified 13 genes in common, a remarkable overlap considering that the expected number of shared genes between two random networks of comparable sizes is virtually 0.


In this study, we performed a genome-wide association analysis using in vivo CNS glutamate concentration in patients with multiple sclerosis as a quantitative trait. Despite the relatively small data set, several SNPs appeared associated at significance levels comparable to those reported in genome-wide analyses. For example, the SNP rs794185 in SUMF1 reached P < 6.44 × 10−7 and a peak of modestly associated markers in three other genes was observed in chromosome 7. SUMF1 is a key activator of sulphatases; it catalyses the hydrolysis of sulphate esters by oxidizing a cysteine residue in the substrate sulphatase to an active site 3-oxoalanine residue, which is also known as C-α-formylglycine. Dysregulation of SUMF1 might lead to reduced activity of other sulphatases (Fraldi et al., 2007). Interestingly, deficiency of the lysosomal arylsulphatase A causes metachromatic leucodystrophy, a severe neurological disorder that affects myelin integrity. Sulphated steroids are powerful endogenous modulators of the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission (Gibbs et al., 2006). In particular, they have been shown to regulate synaptic transmission by altering the function of post-synaptic neurotransmitter receptors (Valenzuela et al., 2008) and to attenuate α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate cytotoxicity on cortical neurons (Shirakawa et al., 2005). Pregnenolone sulphate has been shown to inhibit α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate/kainate as well as a subset of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (GRIN2C and GRIN2D) highly expressed in oligodendrocytes (Salter and Fern, 2005) and myelin (Micu et al., 2006). Reduced activity of pregnenolone sulphate might lead to an increased expression of these receptors, thus accelerating degeneration of white matter elements. Intriguingly, pregnenolone sulphate is highly expressed during pregnancy, a period where relapse rate is significantly reduced (Vukusic et al., 2004).

The use of a protein interaction network to find groups of functionally related genes has been shown to be an effective method to identify genetic modules significantly associated with a trait (Wang et al., 2007; Torkamani et al., 2008; Baranzini et al., 2009a). Using data from a GWAS performed on glutamate in 382 patients, we identified and described a sub-network of the global protein interaction ensemble (Module 14) composed primarily of molecules related to glutamate biology. GRID2 is a component of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor complex and GRIK2 and GRIK5 belong to the kainate-responsive family of glutamate receptors. Variation in the sequence of these genes could lead to an altered glutamate homoeostasis, contributing then to the primary susceptibility and progression underlying multiple sclerosis. Glutamate receptors also associate with a number of accessory proteins whose function is to recruit other members and to stabilize the receptor complex. Five of these genes are also part of Module 14 (AKAP5, DLG2, DLG4, SHANK2, PRKCA) along with two others (DAB1 and DAB2) whose main function is to interact with protein kinase pathways to regulate neuronal positioning in the developing brain. Neuregulin-1 signalling participates in numerous neurodevelopmental processes and variants in this gene have been associated with schizophrenia (Stefansson et al., 2002). More recently, the neuregulin-1 receptor ERBB4 (which is a member of Module 14) has been shown to control synapse maturation and plasticity, thus contributing to the glutamatergic hypofunction characteristic in that disease (Li et al., 2007). DLG4 encodes a member of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase family. As shown in Fig. 2, it interacts with several proteins including membrane-associated guanylate kinase members DLG2 and CASK, and it is then recruited into N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor and potassium channel clusters. DLG2 and CASK interact at post-synaptic sites to form a multimeric scaffold for the clustering of receptors, ion channels and associated signalling proteins. Interestingly, changes in DLG4 expression have also been associated with schizophrenia (Clinton and Meador-Woodruff, 2004; Funk et al., 2009). Finally, the protein tyrosine kinase 2 β (PTK2B) was also a component of Module 14. This gene encodes a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase that is involved in calcium-induced regulation of ion channels and activation of the map kinase signalling pathway. PTK2B represents an important signalling intermediate between neurotransmitter receptors that increase calcium flux and the downstream signals that regulate neuronal activity. Of relevance, PTK2B has been found to regulate glutamate release through the modification of actin dynamics (Ohnishi et al., 2001). Seven members of the TGF-β signalling pathway were also part of Module 14, strongly suggesting the involvement of this pleiotropic cytokine in glutamate metabolism. TGF-β signalling has been previously associated with neuroprotection via regulation of Ca2+ homoeostasis by N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (Meucci and Miller, 1996), although a recent report related this pathway to neuronal activation and glutamate-mediated CNS injury (Luo et al., 2006). These observations underscore the complex regulatory relationship between TGF-β and glutamate. Altogether, Module 14 is largely composed of genes involved in glutamate biology, thus suggesting that the network-based search for significant associations does select biologically relevant genes.

We also performed two additional genome-wide association studies, stratifying the study participants by high or low brain atrophy (neurodegeneration). These data revealed that SUMF1 is highly associated with glutamate concentrations only in the group with high neurodegeneration. This is noteworthy because it suggests that DNA variants in this sulphatase-modifying enzyme are more likely to influence the glutamate concentration in a subset of patients while other mechanisms may be involved in the regulation and maintenance of glutamate concentrations in patients with less neurodegeneration. Indeed, while more evidence for gene networks associated with glutamate concentrations was found in the group with high neurodegeneration, at least one significant network of genes related to glutamate was also found in the group of patients with low neurodegeneration.

In order to quantify the genetic load of a given individual, we developed a genetic score that takes into account the number of alleles associated with the trait (glutamate concentration). Thus, individuals with higher genetic scores are more likely to show higher glutamate levels and other related traits. The significant correlation between genetic scores and NAA decline over the following year is slightly above what would be expected given the relationship between glutamate and NAA levels. This suggests that any effect these genes have on NAA is mediated by glutamate levels. Similarly, we observed that variants in these genes also explain a non-negligible amount of the variance in brain atrophy measured over 1 year. As deduced from the slope of the graph in Fig. 4C, 0.01% of brain volume loss can be attributed to carrying a single additional risk allele from Module 14. Since patients at the extremes of the distribution of genetic scores can differ in as many as 30 units, we estimate that as much as 0.3% (one-third) of the yearly main brain volume loss observed in patients with multiple sclerosis (annual per cent whole brain volume change ≤ −1%) can be attributed to the common variation found in these genes. Correlations between the multiple sclerosis severity score (computed over 2 and 3 years) and the genetic score did not reach significance, possibly due to a lack of power as data from fewer patients were available for these later time points. Another possibility is that in order to observe a causal relationship between glutamate and the multiple sclerosis severity score, a longer follow-up period may be needed. While larger and independent cohorts will be desirable to validate these findings, the exact number of individuals to test for an approach like this is unclear as traditional power calculations to estimate the sample size may not be directly applicable. While increased glutamate can originate from either a defect in transporters or by increased production by activated inflammatory cells (Piani et al., 1991), the exact source could not be determined since the method used here only quantifies total glutamate. Finally, the text-mining approach used to establish biological significance is subject to some limitations including the introduction of false positives and enrichment in well-annotated genes.

In summary, we have identified genetic variation in genes associated with in vivo glutamate measured using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in the grey matter of patients with multiple sclerosis. We have also shown that common variations in a limited group of functionally related genes contribute significantly to NAA decay and brain volume in multiple sclerosis. These results highlight the importance of glutamate in multiple sclerosis biology and generate new hypotheses that link genetic variation with disease progression. Studies of this nature represent the logical next step following the discovery of susceptibility genes and are ideally suited to begin explaining the heterogeneity observed in multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative disorders.


U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG2901D9/1, CA1035-A-7, RG3517/3); U.S. National Institutes of Health (RO1 NS26799); U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (PP1182 to R.S.). DP and SEB are Harry Weaver Fellows from the US NAtional multiple sclerosis Society.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain online.

Supplementary Material

[Supplementary Data]


We would like to acknowledge all the patients that participated in this study. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. S.E.B. and D.P. are Harry Weaver Neuroscience scholars of the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society



domain knowledge score
genome-wide association study
protein interaction network
single nucleotide polymorphism


  • ANZgene. Genome-wide association study identifies new multiple sclerosis susceptibility loci on chromosomes 12 and 20. Nat Genet. 2009;41:824–8. [PubMed]
  • Baranzini SE, Galwey NW, Wang J, Khankhanian P, Lindberg R, Pelletier D, et al. Pathway and network-based analysis of genome-wide association studies in multiple sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2009a;18:2078–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Baranzini SE, Wang J, Gibson RA, Galwey N, Naegelin Y, Barkhof F, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of susceptibility and clinical phenotype in multiple sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2009b;18:767–78. [PubMed]
  • Clinton SM, Meador-Woodruff JH. Abnormalities of the NMDA receptor and associated intracellular molecules in the thalamus in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1353–62. [PubMed]
  • Cowley AW., Jr The genetic dissection of essential hypertension. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:829–40. [PubMed]
  • De Stefano N, Filippi M, Miller D, Pouwels PJ, Rovira A, Gass A, et al. Guidelines for using proton MR spectroscopy in multicenter clinical MS studies. Neurology. 2007;69:1942–52. [PubMed]
  • Dehghan A, Yang Q, Peters A, Basu S, Bis JC, Rudnicka AR, et al. Association of novel genetic Loci with circulating fibrinogen levels: a genome-wide association study in 6 population-based cohorts. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2:125–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dong XX, Wang Y, Qin ZH. Molecular mechanisms of excitotoxicity and their relevance to pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2009;30:379–87. [PubMed]
  • Fraldi A, Biffi A, Lombardi A, Visigalli I, Pepe S, Settembre C, et al. SUMF1 enhances sulfatase activities in vivo in five sulfatase deficiencies. Biochem J. 2007;403:305–12. [PubMed]
  • Funk AJ, Rumbaugh G, Harotunian V, McCullumsmith RE, Meador-Woodruff JH. Decreased expression of NMDA receptor-associated proteins in frontal cortex of elderly patients with schizophrenia. Neuroreport. 2009;20:1019–22. [PubMed]
  • Ganesh SK, Zakai NA, van Rooij FJ, Soranzo N, Smith AV, Nalls MA, et al. Multiple loci influence erythrocyte phenotypes in the CHARGE Consortium. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1191–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gibbs TT, Russek SJ, Farb DH. Sulfated steroids as endogenous neuromodulators. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;84:555–67. [PubMed]
  • Hafler DA, Compston A, Sawcer S, Lander ES, Daly MJ, De Jager PL, et al. Risk alleles for multiple sclerosis identified by a genomewide study. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:851–62. [PubMed]
  • Ideker T, Ozier O, Schwikowski B, Siegel AF. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(Suppl 1):S233–40. [PubMed]
  • Li B, Woo RS, Mei L, Malinow R. The neuregulin-1 receptor erbB4 controls glutamatergic synapse maturation and plasticity. Neuron. 2007;54:583–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Luo J, Lin AH, Masliah E, Wyss-Coray T. Bioluminescence imaging of Smad signaling in living mice shows correlation with excitotoxic neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18326–31. [PubMed]
  • Meucci O, Miller RJ. gp120-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal pyramidal neuron cultures: protective action of TGF-beta1. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4080–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Micu I, Jiang Q, Coderre E, Ridsdale A, Zhang L, Woulfe J, et al. NMDA receptors mediate calcium accumulation in myelin during chemical ischaemia. Nature. 2006;439:988–92. [PubMed]
  • Ohnishi H, Yamamori S, Ono K, Aoyagi K, Kondo S, Takahashi M. A src family tyrosine kinase inhibits neurotransmitter release from neuronal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:10930–5. [PubMed]
  • Okuda DT, Srinivasan R, Oksenberg JR, Goodin DS, Baranzini SE, Beheshtian A, et al. Genotype-Phenotype correlations in multiple sclerosis: HLA genes influence disease severity inferred by 1HMR spectroscopy and MRI measures. Brain. 2009;132:250–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ouardouz M, Coderre E, Zamponi GW, Hameed S, Yin X, Trapp BD, et al. Glutamate receptors on myelinated spinal cord axons: II. AMPA and GluR5 receptors. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:160–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Piani D, Frei K, Do KQ, Cuenod M, Fontana A. Murine brain macrophages induced NMDA receptor mediated neurotoxicity in vitro by secreting glutamate. Neurosci Lett. 1991;133:159–62. [PubMed]
  • Pitt D, Werner P, Raine CS. Glutamate excitotoxicity in a model of multiple sclerosis. Nat Med. 2000;6:67–70. [PubMed]
  • Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75. [PubMed]
  • Ratiney H, Noworolski SM, Sdika M, Srinivasan R, Henry RG, Nelson SJ, et al. Estimation of metabolite T1 relaxation times using tissue specific analysis, signal averaging and bootstrapping from magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging data. MAGMA. 2007;20:143–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Salter MG, Fern R. NMDA receptors are expressed in developing oligodendrocyte processes and mediate injury. Nature. 2005;438:1167–71. [PubMed]
  • Sawcer S. The complex genetics of multiple sclerosis: pitfalls and prospects. Brain. 2008;131:3118–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shen L, Kim S, Risacher SL, Nho K, Swaminathan S, West JD, et al. Whole genome association study of brain-wide imaging phenotypes for identifying quantitative trait loci in MCI and AD: a study of the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage. 2010;51:542–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shirakawa H, Katsuki H, Kume T, Kaneko S, Akaike A. Pregnenolone sulphate attenuates AMPA cytotoxicity on rat cortical neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21:2329–35. [PubMed]
  • Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, Chen J, Matthews PM, Federico A, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage. 2002;17:479–89. [PubMed]
  • Srinivasan R, Cunningham C, Chen A, Vigneron D, Hurd R, Nelson S, et al. TE-averaged two-dimensional proton spectroscopic imaging of glutamate at 3 T. Neuroimage. 2006;30:1171–8. [PubMed]
  • Srinivasan R, Sailasuta N, Hurd R, Nelson S, Pelletier D. Evidence of elevated glutamate in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. Brain. 2005;128:1016–25. [PubMed]
  • Stefansson H, Sigurdsson E, Steinthorsdottir V, Bjornsdottir S, Sigmundsson T, Ghosh S, et al. Neuregulin 1 and susceptibility to schizophrenia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:877–92. [PubMed]
  • Stys PK. General mechanisms of axonal damage and its prevention. J Neurol Sci. 2005;233:3–13. [PubMed]
  • Torkamani A, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. Pathway analysis of seven common diseases assessed by genome-wide association. Genomics. 2008;92:265–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Valenzuela CF, Partridge LD, Mameli M, Meyer DA. Modulation of glutamatergic transmission by sulfated steroids: role in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Brain Res Rev. 2008;57:506–19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vukusic S, Hutchinson M, Hours M, Moreau T, Cortinovis-Tourniaire P, Adeleine P, et al. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis (the PRIMS study): clinical predictors of post-partum relapse. Brain. 2004;127:1353–60. [PubMed]
  • Wang K, Li M, Bucan M. Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genomewide association studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1278–83. [PubMed]

Articles from Brain are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press