PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of aidMary Ann Liebert, Inc.Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.JournalsSearchAlerts
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
 
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2008 June; 24(6): 797–804.
PMCID: PMC2928544

Antiretroviral Resistance among HIV Type 1-Infected Women First Exposed to Antiretrovirals during Pregnancy: Plasma versus PBMCs

Abstract

Resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in plasma samples from HIV-1-infected women who received antiretroviral (ARV) prophylaxis during pregnancy was assessed and correlated with the detection of RAMs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs). The study population was composed of HIV-1-infected women enrolled in a prospective cohort study in Latin America and the Caribbean (NISDI Perinatal Study) as of March 1, 2005, who were diagnosed with HIV-1 infection during the current pregnancy, who received ARVs during pregnancy for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1, and who were followed through at least the 6–12 week postpartum visit. Plasma samples collected at enrollment during pregnancy and at 6–12 weeks postpartum were assayed for RAMs. Plasma results were compared to previously described PBMC results from the same study population. Of 819 enrolled subjects, 197 met the eligibility criteria. Nucleic acid amplification was accomplished in 123 plasma samples at enrollment or 6–12 weeks postpartum, and RAMs were detected in 22 (17.9%; 95%CI: 11.7–25.9%). Previous analyses had demonstrated detection of RAMs in PBMCs in 19 (16.1%). There was high concordance between RAMs detected in plasma and PBMC samples, with only eight discordant pairs. The prevalence of RAMs among these pregnant, HIV-1-infected women is high (>15%). Rates of detection of RAMs in plasma and PBMC samples were similar.

Introduction

One of the most successful strategies to prevent transmission of HIV-1 is the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) through the use of antiretrovirals (ARVs). ARV prophylaxis of MTCT of HIV-1 has proven efficacy,13 and has become a routine part of the management of HIV-1-infected women in many countries.4,5 However, the increase in the prevalence of HIV-1 resistance to ARVs and the transmission of this resistance to new hosts could limit the clinical effectiveness of both ARV prophylaxis, during the index and future pregnancies, and future ARV therapy.6

Resistance testing is usually performed with plasma specimens to detect resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) in circulating viruses. However, the presence of archived RAMs in proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) also has been proposed.7

We previously described RAMs detected in PBMC samples8 from HIV-1-infected women receiving ARVs for prevention of MTCT who were enrolled in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) International Site Development Initiative (NISDI) Perinatal Study at multiple sites in Latin America and the Caribbean.9 In this analysis, we describe RAMs detected in plasma samples from these women, and compare these results to those obtained from PBMC samples in the same study population.8

Materials and Methods

NISDI perinatal protocol

The NISDI Perinatal Study is a prospective cohort study being conducted in Latin American and Caribbean countries.9 Enrollment began in September 2002 and is ongoing. Maternal study visits are conducted during pregnancy, at delivery, at hospital discharge following delivery, and at 6–12 weeks and 6 months postpartum. During each of these study visits, a medical history is obtained, a physical examination is conducted, and laboratory samples are obtained (except at the delivery and the 6 month postpartum visits). Therefore, clinical, immunologic, and virologic characteristics of the women are assessed during pregnancy, at the time of hospital discharge following delivery, and at the 6–12 week postpartum visit. Signed informed consent is obtained for all subjects prior to enrollment into the study. The protocol was approved by the ethical review board at each clinical site where subjects were enrolled, as well as by institutional review boards at the sponsoring institution (NICHD) and at the data management center (Westat).

Definitions and study population for this analysis

Subjects enrolled in the NISDI Perinatal Study were classified as having received ARV prophylaxis if they were not receiving ARVs when they became pregnant, but then initiated one or more ARV drugs during pregnancy and discontinued these drugs at or before the 6–12 week postpartum visit. Conversely, women were classified as receiving ARV treatment if they initiated ARVs prior to the index pregnancy and/or continued ARV drugs after the 6–12 week postpartum visit. The most complex ARV regimen received during pregnancy for 28 days or more was categorized as follows: none, one nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) only; two NRTIs, two NRTIs with one nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI); two NRTIs with one protease inhibitor (PI); or other. The inclusion criteria for this analysis were enrollment in the NISDI Perinatal Study as of March 1, 2005, known to have been diagnosed with HIV-1 infection during the current pregnancy, received ARV prophylaxis during pregnancy, and were followed through at least the 6–12 week postpartum visit.

Laboratory analyses

All available plasma samples collected at baseline and/or at 6–12 weeks postpartum for subjects eligible for inclusion in these analyses were assayed for the presence of RAMs. Plasma samples were assayed with the ViroSeq HIV-1 genotyping system v 2.6, Celera Diagnostics, at the Molecular Virology Laboratory of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran in México City, according to the manufacturer's specifications.

The identification of RAMs was based on recommendations from the International AIDS Society-USA (IAS-USA) Drug Resistance Mutations Group, a panel of experts focused on identifying key HIV-1 drug resistance mutations.10 Only those RAMs described as major mutations were assessed in this analysis.

Statistical analysis

Genotypic resistance was assessed at baseline and at the 6–12 week postpartum visit, with the number and percentage of subjects with RAMs identified singly or in combination reported overall and according to subject characteristics. The association of RAMs with subject characteristics was evaluated using the Fisher–Freeman–Halton11 exact test. Because the number of RAMs detected was relatively small, there was no attempt to model the risk of RAMs as a function of subject characteristics. The kappa statistic, an index that compares the observed agreement against that expected by chance, was used to compare results obtained from PBMCs to plasma specimens.12 Kappa takes on a value of + 1 if there is perfect agreement, with values below 0 indicating observed agreement is less than chance agreement; a value of 0 indicates no agreement above that expected by chance alone.

Results

Study population

Of 819 women enrolled in the NISDI Perinatal Study at clinical sites in Argentina, the Bahamas, Brazil, and Mexico as of March 1, 2005, 197 met inclusion criteria for this analysis. Forty-three (21.7%) were not receiving ARVs at the time of enrollment and 154 (78.3%) initiated ARVs during the current pregnancy, before enrollment into the study. Among those who were ARV-exposed at enrollment, the median duration of receipt of ARVs (from the date of initiation of ARVs through the date of enrollment into the study) was 7.1 weeks.

Characteristics of the study population, overall and according to the timing of initiation of ARVs, have been described previously.9 Briefly, 62% had plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations below 1000 copies/ml at enrollment. By 6–12 weeks postpartum, 27% had plasma viral loads <1000 copies/ml. Most (53%) had CD4+ counts ≥500 cells/mm3 at enrollment compared to 64% at 6–12 weeks. A majority (81%) of the women received a three-drug combination ARV regimen during pregnancy (two NRTIs + one PI, or two NRTIs + one NNRTI), and most (76%) received only one ARV regimen during pregnancy. Women received ARVs for a mean of 4.2 days following delivery (standard deviation ± 8.7 days). The range of duration of receipt of ARVs following delivery was 0–47 days.

RAMs in plasma samples

Among the 197 eligible subjects, plasma samples were available at enrollment from 191 and at 6–12 weeks postpartum from 186 (Table 1). Samples from 74 subjects could not be amplified from plasma at either time point (136 at enrollment and 89 at 6–12 weeks postpartum) and, among the 74, most (83%, 60/74) had plasma viral load values at enrollment below 1000 copies/ml. The association between viral load and whether or not resistance testing could be performed was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) (data not shown). Of the 123 plasma samples where amplification was possible at either time point, RAMs were observed in 22 [17.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7–25.9%] subjects [seven (12.7%; 95% CI 5.2–24.6%) at enrollment and 16 (16.5%; 95% CI 9.8–25.5%) at 6–12 weeks postpartum] (Table 1).

Table 1.
Drug Resistance-Associated Mutations in Plasma Specimens According to Study Visit (n = 198)

Table 2 shows the specific RAMS detected in plasma specimens at enrollment and at 6–12 weeks postpartum. The most common mutations found were K70R, M184V, K103N, and M46I. Table 3 describes individual subjects with RAMs identified at enrollment and/or at 6–12 weeks postpartum in plasma or PBMC specimens. Information is provided for each subject regarding ARV regimens received during pregnancy, CD4+ and viral load testing, and RAMs in plasma and in PBMCs. Of the 16 subjects with RAMs detected in plasma samples at 6–12 weeks postpartum, only one (Subject 14) had a plasma sample from enrollment that could be amplified. In this subject, the same RAMs were detected at each of the two time points.

Table 2.
Resistance-Associated Mutations by Gene Location and Study Visit for Plasma Specimens
Table 3.
Individual Subjects with Resistance-Associated Mutations (RAMs) Identified at Enrollment and/or at 6–12 weeks Postpartum in Plasma or PBMC Specimens

RAMs and clinical characteristics

The occurrence of RAMs was not associated with clinical or immunological disease stage, or with plasma viral load, at either time point (p > 0.1). The occurrence of RAMs varied according to ARV regimen [no ARVs, 0/10 (0%) had RAMs detected; one NRTI only, 2/15 (13.3%); two NRTIs, 5/15 (33.3%); two NRTIs with one NNRTI, 8/31 (25.8%); two NRTIs with one PI, 7/52 (13.5%)], but the association between ARV regimen and RAMs was not statistically significant (p = 0.15).

Comparison of RAMS from plasma versus PBMC samples

RAMs were observed in PBMC samples from 19 of 198 eligible subjects (16.1%) at either enrollment or 6–12 weeks postpartum, from 11 (14.5%) subjects at enrollment, and from 14 subjects (14.4%) at 6–12 weeks postpartum8 (Table 3). Of 25 samples with successful amplification in both plasma and PBMCs at enrollment, 23 sample pairs were concordant (21 without RAMs and 2 with RAMs) while 2 were discordant (one with RAMs in plasma only and one with RAMs in PBMCs only) (kappa = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.23–1.00) (Table 4). At 6–12 weeks postpartum, 57 samples could be amplified in both plasma and PBMC specimens; 51 sample pairs were concordant (47 without RAMs and 4 with RAMs) while six were discordant (four with RAMs in plasma only and two with RAMs in PBMCs only) (kappa = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26–0.77) (Table 4).

Table 4.
Corrrelation of Genotypic Resistance Results between Plasma and PBMC Samples According to Study Visit

Discussion

Among a population of HIV-1-infected mothers from four Latin American and Caribbean countries who received ARVs during pregnancy for MTCT prophylaxis, RAMs were detected in 17.9% of plasma samples at either enrollment (antepartum) or postpartum. The frequency of detection of M184V was 1.8% at enrollment and 5.2% at 6–12 weeks postpartum, and of K103N was 1.8% at enrollment and 3.1% at 6–12 weeks postpartum. These frequencies could be underestimates, since the subjects discontinued their ARV regimens by the time of the 6–12 week visit (some discontinued ARVs shortly after delivery), and the resistance assays would not be able to detect those RAMs, as some disappear quickly and/or some are not detected by genotypic resistance assays that have poor sensitivity for RAMs present in less than 25% of the prevailing viral population.13

Of seven subjects with RAMs at enrollment, four had already received ARVs during pregnancy but before enrollment (albeit only for a median duration of 7 weeks). Three of the seven women had not received ARVs prior to enrollment, and thus the RAMs detected in these women's samples represent transmitted resistance. RAMs were detected among 16 plasma samples at 6–12 weeks postpartum, but, of these 16 samples, the enrollment plasma sample was able to be amplified in only one of the 16 (and the RAMs detected at 6–12 weeks were the same as those detected at enrollment). Thus, although the proportion of the study population with RAMs could be determined, it is not possible to assess development of resistance mutations in relation to ARV prophylaxis regimens received by the women in this cohort. However, possible risk factors for the development of resistance, such as viral load, CD4 count, and clinical stage, did not differ between subjects with and without RAMs in our study population. Poor adherence may lead to subtherapeutic levels of ARVs, thereby increasing the risk for development of drug resistance mutations. Although adherence currently is not assessed in the NISDI Perinatal Study, the protocol is being revised to incorporate assessments of adherence.

ARV resistance among HIV-1-infected women receiving ARVs for prevention of MTCT of HIV-1 has been described previously, including women receiving a two-drug regimen (zidovudine/lamivudine)1416 and women receiving three-drug regimens.17 The latter report is most comparable to our study, in which 81% of women received a three-drug regimen. The overall proportion of RAMs detected in our study is not statistically significantly different from that described by Lyons et al.,17 in which RAMs were detected in 13% of 39 samples obtained postpartum (none was detected prior to receipt of ARVs).

There is limited information available regarding genotypic resistance testing in PBMCs. It is known that PBMC samples could offer information about archived mutations, while plasma samples provide information on replicating viruses. Plasma samples are recommended for decision making in the clinical care setting,7,18,19 although PBMC samples are acceptable when plasma viral loads are low in extensively treated patients. Recently Bon et al.20 described 31 ARV-naive patients whose plasma and PBMC specimens were tested for transmitted resistance. They found that RAMs in the reverse transcriptase were found more frequently in PBMCs and that primary protease mutations were found only in PBMCs, suggesting that the detection of archived mutations could be better for the study of transmitted resistance.

A strength of this analysis is the large size of the study cohort. However, since most of the women received a three-drug ARV regimen, viral loads were relatively low in this population, limiting the number of samples that could be amplified.

Our results indicate genotypic resistance among women receiving ARVs for prophylaxis of MTCT of HIV-1 occurs at a rate similar to or even higher than that reported in other studies. The association of resistance to ARVs given for MTCT prophylaxis on subsequent disease progression and response to future ARV treatment should be evaluated, as this information is very limited.21

Acknowledgments

The NISDI Perinatal Study Group consisted of the following: Principal investigators, study coordinators, coordinating center representatives, and NiCHD staff: Argentina: Buenos Aires: Marcelo H. Losso, Adriana S. Durán, Silvina Ivalo, Alejandro Hakim (Hospital General de Agudos José María Ramos Mejía); Pedro Cahn, Maria Rolon (Hospital Juan Fernandez); Edgardo Szyld, Eduardo Warley (Hospital Diego Paroissien); Mariana Ceriotto, Susana Luciano, Maria Laura Collins (Hospital de Agudos Dra. Cecilia Grierson); Bahamas: Nassau: Perry Gomez, Percival McNeil, Marva Jervis, Chanelle Diggiss, Rosamae Bain (Princess Margaret Hospital); Brazil: Belo Horizonte: Jorge Pinto, Victor Melo, Fabiana Kakehasi (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais); Caxias do Sul: Ricardo de Souza, Jose Mauro Madi (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Hospital Geral de Caxias do Sul); Ricardo de Souza, Rosangela Boff, Ruti Pipi (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Ambulatório Municipal de DST/AIDS); Porto Alegre: Ricardo de Souza, Breno Riegel Santos, Rita Lira (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Hospital Conceicao); Ricardo de Souza, Rosana da Fonseca, Mario Peixoto, Rita Lira (Universidade de Caxias do Sul/Hospital Femina); Ribeirão Preto: Marisa M Mussi-Pinhata, Geraldo Duarte, Alessandra C. Marcolin (HCFMRP-USP); Rio de Janeiro: Marcos Machado D'Ippolito, Esau Custodio Joao, Jacqueline Menezes, Guilherme Amaral Calvet (Hospital dos Servidores do Estado); São Paulo: Regina Celia de Menezes Succi, Prescilla Chow Lindsey (Federal University of São Paulo); Mexico: Mexico City: Javier Ortiz Ibarra, Ricardo Figueroa-Damian, Guadalupe Noemi Plazola-Camacho (Instituto Nacional de Perinatología); Data Management and Statistical Center: René Gonin, James Korelitz, Susan Truitt, Roslyn Hennessey, Yolanda Bertucci, Laura Freimanis, D. Robert Harris, Julianne Byrne (Westat, Rockville, MD, USA); NICHD: Lynne Mofenson, Jack Moye, Jennifer S. Read, Leslie Serchuck, Heather Watts (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Supported by NICHD Contract HN01-HD-3-3345.

References

1. Connor EM. Sperling RS. Gelber R, et al. Reduction of maternal infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1173–1180. [PubMed]
2. Guay LA. Musoke P. Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose NVP compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-infant transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET-012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. [PubMed]
3. Lallemant M. Jourdain G. Le Coeur S, et al. Single-dose perinatal nevirapine plus standard zidovudine to prevent mother-to child transmission of HIV-1 in Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:217–228. [PubMed]
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Public Health Service Task Force Recommendations for use of antiretroviral drugs in pregnant HIV-infected women for maternal health and interventions to reduce perinatal HIV-1 transmission in the United States. www.aidsinfo.nih.gov MMWR Morb Mortal Week Rep. 2005;47:1–30. (Most recent revision of the guidelines. .) [PubMed]
5. European Collaborative Study: Mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:458–465. [PubMed]
6. Giaquinto C. Rampon O. De Rossi A. Antiretroviral therapy for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. Clin Drug Invest. 2006;26:611–627. [PubMed]
7. Bi X. Gatanaga H. Ida S, et al. Emergence of protease inhibitor resistance-associated mutations in plasma HIV-1 precedes that in proviruses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by more than a year. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34(1):1–6. [PubMed]
8. Duran AS. Losso MH. Salomon H, et al. Drug resistance among HIV-infected pregnant women receiving antiretrovirals for prophylaxis. AIDS. 2007;21(2):199–205. [PubMed]
9. Read JS. Cahn P. Losso M, et al. Management of human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant women at Latin America and Caribbean sites. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1358–1367. [PubMed]
10. Johnson VA. Brun-Vézinet F. Clotet B, et al. Update of the drug resistance mutation in HIV-1: Fall 2006. Top HIV Med. 2006;14:125–130. [PubMed]
11. Freeman GH. Halton JH. Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika. 1951;38:141–149. [PubMed]
12. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
13. Palmer S. Kearney M. Maldarelli F, et al. Multiple, linked human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance mutations in treatment-experienced patients are missed by standard genotype analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:406–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Chokephaibulkit K. Chaisilwattana P. Vanprapar N. Phongsamarta W. Sutthentc R. Lack of resistant mutation development after receiving short-course zidovidine plus lamivudine to prevent mother to child HIV transmission. AIDS. 2005;19:1231–1232. [PubMed]
15. Mandelbrot L. Landreau-Mascaro A. Rekacewicz C, et al. Lamivudine—zidovudine combination for prevention of maternal-infant transmission of HIV-1. JAMA. 2001;285:2083–2093. [PubMed]
16. Giuliano M. Palmisano L. Galluzza C, et al. Selection of resistance mutations in pregnant women receiving zidovudine and lamivudine to prevent HIV perinatal transmission. AIDS. 2003;17:1570–1573. [PubMed]
17. Lyons FE. Coughlan S. Byrne CM. Hopkins SM. Hall WW. Mulcahy FM. Emergence of antiretroviral resistance in HIV-positive women receiving combination antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy. AIDS. 2005;19:63–67. [PubMed]
18. Paolucci S. Baldanti F. Campanini G, et al. Analysis of HIV drug-resistant quasispecies in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and viral isolates from treatment-naïve and HAART patients. J Med Virol. 2001;65:207–217. [PubMed]
19. Devereux HL. Loveday C. Youle M, et al. Substantial correlation between HIV type 1 drug-associated resistance mutations in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in treatment-experienced patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000;16:1025–1030. [PubMed]
20. Bon I. Gibellini D. Borderi M, et al. Genotypic resistance in plasma and peripheral blood lymphocytes in a group of naïve HIV-1 patients. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:313–320. [PubMed]
21. Watts DH. Lambert J. Stiehm ER, et al. Progression of HIV disease among women following delivery. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:585–593. for the PACTG 185 Study Team. [PubMed]

Articles from AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.