PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of comintbioLink to Publisher's site
 
Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Jul-Aug; 3(4): 340–342.
PMCID: PMC2928312
Neurogranin and synaptic plasticity balance
Ling Zhong and Nashaat Z Gergescorresponding author
Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy; Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee, WI USA
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Correspondence to: Nashaat Z. Gerges; Email: ngerges/at/mcw.edu
Received March 7, 2010; Accepted March 8, 2010.
Learning-related modifications of synaptic transmission at CA1 hippocampal excitatory synapses are activity- and NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-dependent. While a postsynaptic increase in Ca2+ is absolutely required for synaptic plasticity induction, the molecular mechanisms underlying the transduction of synaptic signals to postsynaptic changes are not clearly understood. In our recent study, we found that the postsynaptic calmodulin (CaM)-binding protein neurogranin (Ng) enhances synaptic strength in an activity- and NMDAR-dependent manner. Furthermore we have shown that Ng is not only required for the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP), but its mediated synaptic potentiation also mimics and occludes LTP. Our results demonstrate that Ng plays an important role in the regulation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity and synaptic function. Here, we summarize our findings and further discuss their possible implications in aging-related synaptic plasticity deficits.
Key words: neurogranin, calmodulin, CaMKII, calcneurin, aging, LTP, LTD
Synaptic connections undergo continuous remodeling in response to neuronal activity. This process, known as synaptic plasticity, is widely thought to underlie learning and memory.14 The two best-characterized forms of synaptic plasticity are long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD). Both are accompanied by long-lasting changes in synaptic strength. It is widely accepted that changes in the number of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) at the synapses primarily contribute to the expression of LTP and LTD. For example, LTP is mediated by an increase in the number of AMPARs present at synapses, in various brain structures,512 whereas LTD is accompanied by the removal of AMPARs from synapses in hippocampus1316 and cerebellum.1318 Thus, the change in synaptic strength is due, at least in part, to an increase (LTP) or decrease (LTD) in synaptic AMPARs.
At excitatory synapses in CA1 hippocampal neurons, LTP and LTD share a common pathway for their induction. Both require the activation of postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and an increase in Ca2+ influx. LTP and LTD are tightly regulated, where the level of Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) affects the activation of enzymes that are critical for controlling the balance of synaptic plasticity. Two such enzymes are Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein phosphatase calcineurin and Ca2+/CaMdependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). At high Ca2+/CaM concentrations, CaMKII is activated resulting in the insertion of AMPARs and the expression of LTP.1922 On the other hand, low Ca2+/CaM concentration activates calcineurin, resulting in a weakening of synaptic strength and the expression of LTD.2326 Thus, the availability of CaM can ultimately regulate the balance between CaMKII and calcineurin activation, and therefore, can play an essential role in the bidirectional control of synaptic plasticity.
Calmodulin-mediated signaling has been studied extensively in a wide range of cellular processes. It is now appreciated that calmodulin-binding proteins buffer CaM, keeping its free intracellular concentration minimal. One of the most abundant postsynaptic calmodulin-binding proteins is neurogranin (Ng), a neuron-specific protein enriched in the hippocampus and cortex.2729 Unlike most other calmodulin-binding proteins (e.g., CaMKII, calcineurin), Ng binds to CaM only in the absence of Ca2+. This property suggests that Ng could act as a reservoir for CaM and a sensor for Ca2+. Thus, Ng can control CaM availability during synaptic plasticity induction, where the levels of Ca2+ are elevated. Therefore, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that Ng may control the balance in the synaptic activation of CaMKII and calcineurin, which, in turn, affect the balance between LTP and LTD.
Our study focused on the effects of Ng on synaptic transmission and LTP induction. We showed that Ng overexpression enhanced synaptic strength by increasing AMPAR-mediated responses in CA1 neurons.30 This potentiation was due to an increased number of AMPARs at the synapses, which was dependent on neuronal activity and NMDAR activation. To determine whether Ng-mediated potentiation was dependent on Ng-CaM binding, we expressed Ng mutants that were either incapable of binding CaM (Ng-IQless or Ng-S36D) or a mutant that constitutively binds to CaM (Ng-S36AF37W), even in the presence of Ca2+. Overexpression of any of these mutants was unable to enhance synaptic transmission, indicating that the ability of Ng to bind to and release CaM upon demand is responsible for the Ng-mediated potentiation of synaptic transmission. We have also demonstrated that Ng-mediated AMPAR insertion requires CaMKII activation and that Ng overexpression resulted in an increased activity of CaMKII at the synapse.
To assess the role of Ng in LTP induction, we induced LTP in single neurons by pairing presynaptic stimulation with postsynaptic depolarization. We found that Ng-mediated potentiation was able to occlude LTP induction, suggesting that both share a common mechanism. To test whether Ng is required for LTP induction, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to knock down the endogenous Ng. Knocking down Ng blocked LTP, confirming its importance in LTP induction.31 Taken together, these results show that Ng is required for LTP and that it has a critical role in hippocampal synaptic function and synaptic plasticity.
The balance between the induction of LTP and LTD allows neurons to maintain their ability to undergo further synaptic remodeling. Since LTP and LTD are thought to underlie learning and memory, it is no surprise then that many learning and memory deficits are associated with impaired synaptic plasticity balance. For instance, aged rats with spatial memory deficits exhibit a lower threshold for induction of LTD32,33 and a higher threshold for induction of LTP.3436 Interestingly, there is evidence suggesting that age-related changes in LTP and LTD are attributed, at least partially, to changes in Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling. For example, aging is associated with an increase in calcineurin activity37 and a decrease in CaMKII activity.38 The imbalanced activation of CaMKII and calcineurin could be due, in part, to changes in the sensitivity to detect intraspine Ca2+ changes or in the availability or distribution of CaM. As mentioned above, Ng can work as a sensor for Ca2+ and a reservoir for CaM, controlling its availability and distribution. Thus, changes in Ng levels can ultimately influence the balance between CaMKII and calcineurin activation and hence the synaptic plasticity balance.
Knocking Ng out resulted in the impairment of synaptic plasticity balance as well as in learning and memory deficits.31,39 In addition, Huang et al. has also shown that Ng levels in the hippocampus are highly correlated with performance in spatial memory tasks.31 Interestingly, Ng expression decreases with aging.40 It is intriguing to speculate about the role of Ng in aging-induced synaptic plasticity deficits. For example, if a decrease in Ng level is correlated with aging-induced learning and memory deficits, then such deficits could be alleviated or reversed by increasing Ng levels in hippocampal neurons. In support of this hypothesis, agents that increase Ng levels (e.g., vitamin A) have been shown to partially alleviate aging-induced memory and synaptic plasticity deficits.41 Future studies are needed to investigate the possible role of Ng in synaptic plasticity deficits, as well as learning and memory deficits that are associated with aging and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from US National Institute on Aging (AG032320), MCW Research Affairs Committee, Extendicare Foundation Inc., Alzheimer’s Association and American Thyroid Association to N.Z.G.
Footnotes
1. Alkon DL, Nelson TJ. Specificity of molecular changes in neurons involved in memory storage. FASEB J. 1990;4:1–4. [PubMed]
2. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39. [PubMed]
3. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. Principles of neural science. Fourth ed. Appleton & Lange; 2000.
4. Benfenati F. Synaptic plasticity and the neurobiology of learning and memory. Acta Biomed. 2007;78:58–66. [PubMed]
5. Liao D, Hessler NA, Malinow R. Activation of post-synaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice. Nature. 1995;375:400–404. [PubMed]
6. Isaac JT, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC. Evidence for silent synapses: implications for the expression of LTP. Neuron. 1995;15:427–434. [PubMed]
7. Shi SH, Hayashi Y, Petralia RS, Zaman SH, Wenthold RJ, Svoboda K, et al. Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Science. 1999;284:1811–1816. [PubMed]
8. Hayashi Y, Shi SH, Esteban JA, Piccini A, Poncer JC, Malinow R. Driving AMPA receptors into synapses by LTP and CaMKII: requirement for GluR1 and PDZ domain interaction. Science. 2000;287:2262–2267. [PubMed]
9. Liao D, Scannevin RH, Huganir R. Activation of silent synapses by rapid activity-dependent synaptic recruitment of AMPA receptors. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6008–6017. [PubMed]
10. Rumpel S, Hatt H, Gottmann K. Silent synapses in the developing rat visual cortex: evidence for postsynaptic expression of synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8863–8874. [PubMed]
11. Feldman DE, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity at thalamocortical synapses in developing rat somatosensory cortex: LTP LTD, and silent synapses. J Neurobiol. 1999;41:92–101. [PubMed]
12. Li P, Zhuo M. Silent glutamatergic synapses and nociception in mammalian spinal cord. Nature. 1998;393:695–698. [PubMed]
13. Beattie EC, Carroll RC, Yu X, Morishita W, Yasuda H, von Zastrow M, et al. Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:1291–1300. [PubMed]
14. Carroll RC, Beattie EC, Xia H, Lüscher C, Altschuler Y, Nicoll RA, et al. Dynamin-dependent endocytosis of ionotropic glutamate receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:14112–14117. [PubMed]
15. Man HY, Lin JW, Ju WH, Ahmadian G, Liu L, Becker LE, et al. Regulation of AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission by clathrin-dependent receptor internalization. Neuron. 2000;25:649–662. [PubMed]
16. Zhu Y, Pak D, Qin Y, McCormack SG, Kim MJ, Baumgart JP, et al. Rap2-JNK removes synaptic AMPA receptors during depotentiation. Neuron. 2005;46:905–916. [PubMed]
17. Wang YT, Linden DJ. Expression of cerebellar longterm depression requires postsynaptic clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Neuron. 2000;25:635–647. [PubMed]
18. Steinberg JP, Huganir RL, Linden DJ. N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor is required for the synaptic incorporation and removal of AMPA receptors during cerebellar long-term depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:18212–18216. [PubMed]
19. Lisman J, Schulman H, Cline H. The molecular basis of CaMKII function in synaptic and behavioural memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:175–190. [PubMed]
20. Meyer T, Hanson PI, Stryer L, Schulman H. Calmodulin trapping by calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Science. 1992;256:1199–1202. [PubMed]
21. Silva AJ, Wang Y, Paylor R, Wehner JM, Stevens CF, Tonegawa S. Alpha calcium/calmodulin kinase II mutant mice: deficient long-term potentiation and impaired spatial learning. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1992;57:527–539. [PubMed]
22. Giese KP, Fedorov NB, Filipkowski RK, Silva AJ. Autophosphorylation at Thr286 of the alpha calcium-calmodulin kinase II in LTP and learning. Science. 1998;279:870–873. [PubMed]
23. Mulkey RM, Endo S, Shenolikar S, Malenka RC. Involvement of a calcineurin/inhibitor-1 phosphatase cascade in hippocampal long-term depression. Nature. 1994;369:486–488. [PubMed]
24. Zeng H, Chattarji S, Barbarosie M, Rondi-Reig L, Philpot BD, Miyakawa T, et al. Forebrain-specific calcineurin knockout selectively impairs bidirectional ynaptic plasticity and working/episodic-like memory. Cell. 2001;107:617–629. [PubMed]
25. Torii N, Kamishita T, Otsu Y, Tsumoto T. An inhibitor for calcineurin, FK506, blocks induction of longterm depression in rat visual cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1995;185:1–4. [PubMed]
26. Klee CB, Crouch TH, Krinks MH. Calcineurin: a calcium- and calmodulin-binding protein of the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:6270–6273. [PubMed]
27. Represa A, Deloulme JC, Sensenbrenner M, Ben-Ari Y, Baudier J. Neurogranin: immunocytochemical localization of a brain-specific protein kinase C substrate. J Neurosci. 1990;10:3782–3792. [PubMed]
28. Gerendasy DD, Herron SR, Watson JB, Sutcliffe JG. Mutational and biophysical studies suggest RC3/neurogranin regulates calmodulin availability. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:22420–22426. [PubMed]
29. Gerendasy DD, Herron SR, Wong KK, Watson JB, Sutcliffe JG. Rapid purification, site-directed mutagenesis, and initial characterization of recombinant RC3/neurogranin. J Mol Neurosci. 1994;5:133–148. [PubMed]
30. Zhong L, Cherry T, Bies CE, Florence MA, Gerges NZ. Neurogranin enhances synaptic strength through its interaction with calmodulin. EMBO J. 2009;28:3027–3039. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Huang KP, Huang FL, Jäger T, Li J, Reymann KG, Balschun D. Neurogranin/RC3 enhances long-term potentiation and learning by promoting calcium-mediated signaling. J Neurosci. 2004;24:10660–10669. [PubMed]
32. Norris CM, Korol DL, Foster TC. Increased susceptibility to induction of long-term depression and long-term potentiation reversal during aging. J Neurosci. 1996;16:5382–5392. [PubMed]
33. Foster TC, Norris CM. Age-associated changes in Ca2+-dependent processes: relation to hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Hippocampus. 1997;7:602–612. [PubMed]
34. Deupree DL, Bradley J, Turner DA. Age-related alterations in potentiation in the CA1 region in F344 rats. Neurobiol Aging. 1993;14:249–258. [PubMed]
35. Moore CI, Browning MD, Rose GM. Hippocampal plasticity induced by primed burst, but not long-term potentiation, stimulation is impaired in area CA1 of aged Fischer 344 rats. Hippocampus. 1993;3:57–66. [PubMed]
36. Rosenzweig ES, Rao G, McNaughton BL, Barnes CA. Role of temporal summation in age-related long-term potentiation-induction deficits. Hippocampus. 1997;7:549–558. [PubMed]
37. Foster TC, Sharrow KM, Masse JR, Norris CM, Kumar A. Calcineurin links Ca2+ dysregulation with brain aging. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4066–4073. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Davis S, Salin H, Helme-Guizon A, Dumas S, Stéphan A, Corbex M. Dysfunctional regulation of alphaCaMKII and syntaxin 1B transcription after induction of LTP in the aged rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2000;12:3276–3282. [PubMed]
39. Krucker T, Siggins GR, McNamara RK, Lindsley KA, Dao A, Allison DW, et al. Targeted disruption of RC3 reveals a calmodulin-based mechanism for regulating metaplasticity in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2002;22:5525–5535. [PubMed]
40. Mons N, Enderlin V, Jaffard R, Higueret P. Selective age-related changes in the PKC-sensitive, calmodulin-binding protein, neurogranin, in the mouse brain. J Neurochem. 2001;79:859–867. [PubMed]
41. Etchamendy N, et al. Alleviation of a selective agerelated relational memory deficit in mice by pharmacologically induced normalization of brain retinoid signaling. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6423–6429. [PubMed]
Articles from Communicative & Integrative Biology are provided here courtesy of
Landes Bioscience