PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Nature. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 24.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2926796
NIHMSID: NIHMS228339

GTP-binding proteins mediate transmitter inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels

Abstract

The modulation of voltage-dependent calcium channels by hormones and neurotransmitters has important implications for the control of many Ca2+-dependent cellular functions including exocytosis and contractility17. We made use of electrophysiological techniques, including whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones, to demonstrate a role for GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) as signal transducers in the noradrenaline- and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-induced inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels811. This action of the transmitters was blocked by: (1) preincubation of the cells with pertussis toxin (a bacterial exotoxin catalysing ADP-ribosylation of G-proteins12); or (2) intracellular administration of guanosine 5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) (GDP-β-S), a non-hydrolysable analogue of GDP that competitively inhibits the binding of GTP to G-proteins13. Our findings provide the first direct demonstration of the G-protein-mediated inhibition of voltage-dependent calcium channels by neurotransmitters. This mode of transmitter action may explain the ability of noradrenaline and GABA to presynaptically inhibit Ca2+-dependent neurosecretion from DRG sensory neurones4,5.

Recordings were obtained from primary cultures of embryonic chick DRG cells (see Fig. 1). When bathed in solutions containing 1 mM Ba2+ and 2 mM Ca2+, these cells generate action potentials with a prominent calcium-dependent plateau phase. The plateau results from a regenerative inward current carried by Ba2+ and Ca2+ ions and is blocked by cobalt14. Previous studies have demonstrated that noradrenaline and GABA decrease the duration of these action potentials by inhibiting the depolarization-induced calcium current8,9. In the present study, a saturating concentration of noradrenaline (50 µM) reduced the action-potential duration in 75% of the cells tested by an average of 43 ± 4.7% (Fig. 1a, Table 1). The inhibitory action of noradrenaline was also observed as a decrease in the Ca current recorded from voltage-clamped DRG cells (Fig. 1b). Similar decreases in action-potential duration and Ca current were also observed during application of GABA (Table 1).

Fig. 1
Noradrenaline and OAG decrease action-potential duration and Ca current in chick DRG cells. a, c, Current-clamp recordings of DRG cell action potentials; b, d, voltage-clamp recordings of Ca currents. Traces were recorded before (1), during (2) and after ...
Table 1
Pertussis toxin blocks DRG cell responses to noradrenaline and GABA

Pertussis toxin (PTX) blocks G-protein-mediated responses to hormones and neurotransmitters in many cell types12. Specifically, PTX catalyses ADP-ribosylation of G-proteins, thereby preventing agonist-induced dissociation of the proteins into active subunits15,16. When applied to DRG cells, PTX inhibits the transmitter-induced decrease in action-potential duration (Table 1). Following exposure to PTX (140 ng ml−1), only 9 and 19% of the cells responded to noradrenaline and GABA, respectively. Note that the mean percentage decrease in action-potential duration for those PTX-treated cells which did respond to noradrenaline and GABA was also reduced relative to control. The responses recorded from PTX-treated cells were very slow in onset: the maximal decrease in action-potential duration was observed only after continued application of noradrenaline or GABA for 1–2 min. In contrast, noradrenaline and GABA responses recorded from cells untreated with PTX were rapid in onset, reaching a maximal decrease in action-potential duration after only 20–30 s of continual application.

Recordings from voltage-clamped DRG cells demonstrated that, as expected, PTX also blocked the transmitter-induced decrease in Ca current. Before PTX treatment, noradrenaline (10 µM) reduced the Ca current by 35 ± 6.0% in seven of 8 cells tested. After treatment with 140 ng ml−1 PTX, the fraction of cells responding to noradrenaline was reduced to two of eight, and the average decrease in Ca current was only 13 ± 2.4%. The action of PTX seems to be selective for receptor-mediated alterations in Ca channel function: PTX did not block responses to the diacylglycerol analogue 1,2-oleoyl acetylglycerol (OAG), an activator of protein kinase C that mimics the effects of noradrenaline and GABA on DRG cells17. A saturating concentration of OAG (60 µM) decreased the action-potential duration by an average of 37 ± 2.9% in 74% of the cells tested (n = 19) and decreased the Ca current by 38 ± 5.3% in five of five cells tested (Fig. 1c, d). In cultures treated with PTX (140 ng ml−1), the responses to OAG were not attenuated.

ADP-ribosylation of G-proteins by PTX requires prior internalization and activation of the toxin12. The effects of PTX, therefore, occur with some delay. When PTX was tested on DRG cells, we found its action to be slow in onset and prolonged in duration (Fig. 2a). A progressive decrease in the number of cells responding to noradrenaline was observed after treatment with PTX for 30, 50 and 70 min. A progressive decrease in the magnitude of the response to noradrenaline was also observed. A lag time of ~30 min preceded the inhibitory actions of PTX. To test for recovery, cultures were exposed to 140 ng ml−1 PTX for 4h, washed repeatedly with minimal essential medium (MEM) and re-incubated in culture medium. Even after 48 h of recovery, a total blockade of transmitter action was observed (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
Time- and temperature-dependent blockade by PTX of DRG cell responses to noradrenaline. a, Time dependence of the action of PTX. DRG cell cultures were incubated in MEM containing 140 ng ml−1 PTX at 37 °C for 30, 50 and 70 min (circles). ...

As expected for a process of internalization, the action of PTX was temperature-dependent. Incubation of cultures in MEM containing 140 ng ml−1 PTX for 4 h at 5 °C did not diminish the response to noradrenaline (Fig. 2b). When cultures were incubated in PTX for 4 h at 23 °C, the number of cells responding to noradrenaline was reduced, and the magnitude of the response decreased relative to the control response. With an increase in incubation temperature to 37 °C, a total blockade of the action of noradrenaline was observed.

The blockade of noradrenaline and GABA responses by PTX suggests that G-proteins mediate the inhibitory actions of transmitters on neuronal Ca channels. To substantiate such a role for G-proteins, DRG cells were voltage-clamped and loaded with GDP-β-S by the whole-cell recording variation of the patch-clamp technique18. GDP-β-S competes with GTP for the guanine nucleotide binding site on G-proteins, thereby blocking GTP-dependent activation of the proteins by hormones and neurotransmitters1921. Intracellular dialysis of DRG cells with GDP-β-S (100–500 µM) blocked the noradrenaline-induced decrease in Ca current in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3). The blockade of noradrenaline responses was observed using concentrations of GDP-β-S similar to that reported to block adrenergic receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylate cyclase in human platelets20. Additional experiments demonstrated that GDP-β-S does not interfere with the action of OAG on DRG cells. Before exposure to GDP-β-S, OAG reduced the Ca current by 38 ± 5.3% (n = 5), whereas after treatment with 250 µM GDP-β-S, OAG decreased the Ca current by 35 ± 3.0% (n = 5).

Fig. 3
Blockade by GDP-β-S of DRG cell responses to noradrenaline. DRG cells were dialysed for 5 min with 100 (a), 250 (b) and 500 (c) µM GDP-β-S (trilithium salt, Boehringer Mannheim) by inclusion of the GDP analogue in the patch pipette ...

The noradrenaline and GABA receptors mediating inhibition of DRG cell Ca channels are similar to α-2 adrenergic22 and GABA-B23 receptors, two receptor subtypes known to be negatively coupled to adenylate cyclase24,25. The actions of GDP-β-S and PTX on chick DRG cells may therefore result from their ability to block noradrenaline and GABA receptor-mediated activation of the G-protein (Ni) promoting transmitter inhibition of adenylate cyclase15,20,26,27. In this manner, noradrenaline and GABA would inhibit Ca channel function by lowering intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP. To test this hypothesis, we dialysed DRG cells with solutions containing 5 mM cAMP and 250 µM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor). As previously reported28, cAMP did not attenuate the noradrenaline-induced inhibition of the Ca current (N = 5 cells). These findings indicate that in DRG cells the PTX substrate mediating transmitter inhibition is a G-protein structurally related to Ni, but not directly coupled to adenylate cyclase. One possibility is that this DRG cell G-protein corresponds to the PTX-sensitive N0 α-protein of relative molecular mass 39,000 isolated from bovine brain29,30.

Previous studies support a role for G-proteins in the receptor-mediated activation of membrane phospholipases3135. It remains to be determined whether a similar G-protein-mediated stimulation of phospholipase activity underlies the inhibitory actions of noradrenaline and GABA on neuronal Ca channels. The best evidence implicating phospholipases in the inhibition of neuronal Ca channels is the demonstration that the protein kinase C activator OAG36 blocks the DRG cell Ca current in a manner similar to that of noradrenaline and GABA17. Alternatively, G-proteins may directly couple transmitter receptors to the Ca channel. Although these points remain to be resolved, our findings clearly indicate that cellular processes controlling Ca homeostasis are influenced by alterations in the structure and function of G-proteins. In terms of neuronal function, therefore, G-proteins are likely to serve as important intermediaries in processes governing receptor-mediated inhibition or facilitation of Ca2+-dependent neurosecretion.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Ron Sekura for the gift of PTX and Drs Paul Brehm and Michael Goy for their advice. This work was supported by grants to K.D. from the Klingenstein Foundation and the American Heart Association.

References

1. Kupferman I. A. Rev. Neurosci. 1979;2:447–465. [PubMed]
2. Shain W, Carpenter DO. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1981;22:205–250. [PubMed]
3. Dunlap K. In: The Mechanism of Gated Calcium Transport across Biological Membranes. Ohnishi ST, Endo M, editors. New York: Academic; 1981. pp. 87–97.
4. Fischbach GD, Dunlap K, Mudge AW, Leeman S. In: Neurosecretion and Brain Peptides. Martin JB, Reichlin S, Bick KL, editors. New York: Raven; 1981. pp. 175–188.
5. Holz GG, Kream RM, Dunlap K. Soc. Neurosci Abstr. 1985;11:126.
6. Holz GG, Shefner SA, Anderson EG. J. Neurosci. (in the press)
7. Reuter H, Scholz H. J. Physiol. Lond. 1977;264:49–62. [PubMed]
8. Dunlap K, Fischbach G. J. Physiol., Lond. 1981;317:519–535. [PubMed]
9. Dunlap K, Fischbach G. Nature. 1978;276:837–839. [PubMed]
10. Houslay MD. Trends biochem. Sci. 1984;9:39–40.
11. Gilman AG. Cell. 1984;36:577–579. [PubMed]
12. Ui M. Trends pharmac. Sci. 1984;5:277–279.
13. Eckstein F, Cassel D, Levkovitz H, Lowe M, Selinger Z. J. biol. Chem. 1979;254:9829–9834. [PubMed]
14. Dichter M, Fischbach GD. J. Physiol. Lond. 1977;267:281–298. [PubMed]
15. Katada T, Bokoch GM, Northup JK, Ui M, Gilman AG. J. biol. Chem. 1984;259:3568–3577. [PubMed]
16. Jakobs KH, Aktories K, Schultz G. Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res. Protein Phosphor. 1984;17:135–143. [PubMed]
17. Rane SG, Dunlap K. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986;83:184–188. [PubMed]
18. Hamill O, Marty A, Neher E, Sakman B, Sigworth FJ. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 1981;391:85–100. [PubMed]
19. Cassel D, Eckstein F, Lowe M, Selinger Z. J. biol. Chem. 1979;254:9835–9838. [PubMed]
20. Jakobs KH. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983;132:125–130. [PubMed]
21. Lemos JR, Levitan IB. J. gen. Physiol. 1984;83:269–285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Canfield DR, Dunlap K. Br. J. Pharmac. 1984;82:557–563. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Dunlap K. Br. J. Pharmac. 1981;74:579–585. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Sabol SL, Nirenberg M. J. biol. Chem. 1979;254:1913–1920. [PubMed]
25. Wojcik WJ, Neff NH. Molec. Pharmac. 1984;25:24–28. [PubMed]
26. Hazeki O, Ui M. J. biol. Chem. 1981;256:2856–2862. [PubMed]
27. Cote TE, Frey EA, Sekura RD. J. biol. Chem. 1984;259:8693–8698. [PubMed]
28. Forscher P, Oxford GS. J. gen. Physiol. 1985;85:743–763. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Neer E, Lok J, Wolf L. J. biol. Chem. 1984;259:14222–14229. [PubMed]
30. Sternweis PC, Robishaw JD. J. biol. Chem. 1984;259:13806–13813. [PubMed]
31. Nakamura T, Ui M. J. biol. Chem. 1985;260:3584–3593. [PubMed]
32. Bradford PG, Rubin RP. FEBS Lett. 1985;183:317–320. [PubMed]
33. Volpi M, et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1985;82:2708–2712. [PubMed]
34. Cockcroft S, Comperts B. Nature. 1985;314:534–536. [PubMed]
35. Wallace MA, Fain JN. J. biol. Chem. 1985;260:9527–9530. [PubMed]
36. Nishizuka Y. Nature. 1984;308:693–698. [PubMed]