PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of narLink to Publisher's site
 
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 August; 38(15): e156.
Published online 2010 June 14. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkq556
PMCID: PMC2926626

A dumbbell probe-mediated rolling circle amplification strategy for highly sensitive microRNA detection

Abstract

We herein report the design of a dumbbell-shaped DNA probe that integrates target-binding, amplification and signaling within one multifunctional design. The dumbbell probe can initiate rolling circle amplification (D-RCA) in the presence of specific microRNA (miRNA) targets. This D-RCA-based miRNA strategy allows quantification of miRNA with very low quantity of RNA samples. The femtomolar sensitivity of D-RCA compares favorably with other existing technologies. More significantly, the dynamic range of D-RCA is extremely large, covering eight orders of magnitude. We also demonstrate miRNA quantification with this highly sensitive and inexpensive D-RCA strategy in clinical samples.

INTRODUCTION

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short (19–24 bases), endogenous non-coding RNAs that mediate post-transcriptional gene regulation by base pairing to the 3′ untranslated region of messenger RNAs. These miRNAs are regulated temporally and spatially, and involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis (1–3). Over the past decade, in particular, studies on miRNA expression profiles have shown that aberrant expression exits in human cancer cell lines (4,5) and primary cancers (6–9). The close correlation between dysregulation of miRNA expression and human cancers has intrigued intense interest to explore the possibility of using miRNAs to classify human cancers, and for utilization as cancer-specific biomarkers for clinical diagnostics (10).

There is increasing interest in developing new methods for nucleic acid detection that has high significance in genetic analysis, molecular diagnostics and rapid screening of infectious diseases (11–16). Particularly, motivated by the above-mentioned miRNA studies, various strategies for the detection of miRNAs have been proposed, such as real-time quantitative PCR (17,18), locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based northern blot (19), microarray or bead-based flow-cytometry (20–24), array-based Klenow enzyme assay (25) and miRNAs serial analysis of gene expression (26). These novel strategies involve methodological improvement on design and labeling of primers or probes, chemical modification of nucleotides and incorporation of signal amplification. More recently, an isothermal amplification method designated as rolling circle amplification (RCA), was employed for sensitive detection of miRNAs. Due to the simplicity, robustness and high signal amplification of RCA, it has been popularly employed in DNA (15,27) and protein detection (28).

Several novel methods for miRNA detection by using padlock probe-based RCA have been reported (29,30). Jonstrup et al. (29) first reported an RCA-based protocol for miRNA detection, which nevertheless relied on time-consuming northern blotting. Cheng et al. (30) improved this method by introducing a second primer, and then RCA products were analyzed via fluorescence from an intercalative dye, SYBR Green I (SG). In addition to the sensitivity, selectivity is the other important factor in miRNA detection. Several previous reports have employed a stem–loop primer (31), LNA modification (24) and high-stringency enzymes (30) to improve the specificity of miRNA detection. In this work, we propose a dumbbell probe (32)-mediated RCA (D-RCA) strategy for high sensitivity and selective miRNA detection (Figure 1). We aim to improve the sensitivity of miRNA detection via RCA, and the selectivity by using the dumbbell probe to reduce non-specific amplification.

Figure 1.
The D-RCA strategy for miRNA detection. A dumbbell probe contains three domains, an MBD, an SGBD and a loop domain. The binding of miRNA to MBD initiates RCA in the presence of T4 DNA ligase and phi29 polymerase, which generates a long DNA sequence that ...

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oligonucleotides and total RNA

Oligonucleotides were purchased from Invitrogen. The sequences for the interrogated miRNA are shown in Supplementary Table S1, and the sequences of all hairpin probes are listed in Supplementary Table S2. These probes were chemically synthesized with a phosphate at the 5′ end and purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Invitrogen). Total RNA from colon tumor tissue (CTT) and normal adjacent tissue (NAT) were obtained from Ambion.

Ligation reactions

The ligation reaction was carried out with 20 μl of a reaction mixture containing 1× ligation buffer [40 mM Tris–HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Dithiothreitol (DTT), 500 μM ATP (pH 7.8), 10 units of T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas), the dumbbell probe and 2 μl of synthetic miRNA]. Before adding T4 DNA ligase and ligation buffer, the oligonucleotide mixture was denatured at 65°C for 3 min, and cooled slowly to room temperature over a 10-min period. After annealing, T4 DNA ligase and ligation buffer were added to the mixture and incubated at 37°C for 2 h.

RCA reactions

For RCA, the 20-μl ligation product was mixed with 4 μl 10× reaction buffer [330 mM Tris–acetate, 100 mM Mg(Ac)2, 660 mM Potassium Acetate (KAc), 1% Tween 20 and 10 mM DTT (pH 7.9), 2 μl (10 u/μL) phi29 DNA polymerase (Fermentas), 8 μl 10 mM dNTPs mixture (Takara) and RNase-free water]. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 6 h.

Measurement of fluorescent spectra

The RCA amplification product was mixed with 10 μl 10× SG dye (Invitrogen) and diluted to final volume of 200 μl with 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4). The fluorescent spectra were measured using a spectrofluorophotometer. The excitation wavelength was 497 nm, and the spectra are recorded between 507 and 650 nm. The fluorescence emission intensity was measured at 530 nm.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We designed a dumbbell probe with two stem–loop structures as a recognition element for the specific detection of miRNA with high sensitivity (Figure 1). The dumbbell probe contains three domains, a miRNA-binding domain (MBD), a SG-binding domain (SGBD), and a loop domain. The specific probe-target binding occurs at the MBD, which contains two segments that are designed to be complementary to the target miRNA. MBD-miRNA binding leads to a nick-containing duplex, which is closed to form a loop in the presence of T4 DNA ligase. The SGBD is the signaling domain that is a segment of duplex. SG can preferably bind to the SGBD duplex via intercalation (33), leading to strong fluorescent signals. The loop domain is a spacer region, which provides a covalent linker between the duplex. Importantly, when miRNA binds to the MBD that closes the dumbbell with the action of ligase, phi29 DNA polymerase can initiate the RCA reaction that replicates numerous dumbbell probes.

The RCA products were quantified via the fluorescent intensity of SG. We reason that the dumbbell probe could improve both the sensitivity and the specificity of miRNA detection. The fact that one SGBD domain can bind to many molecules of SG offers additional signal amplification for miRNA detection. On the other hand, the presence of the stem–loop structures in the dumbbell probe brings about high conformational constraint, and the competition between the stem region and the loop/target binding could significantly improve the specificity (17,34).

The inherent binding ability of the dumbbell probe with SG was first evaluated. The emission peak of SG appeared at 530 nm when the concentration of dumbbell probes reached 100 nM (Supplementary Figure S1). This fluorescent emission is due to the preferable intercalative binding of SG to dsDNA (33). Background suppression is important for ultrasensitive nucleic acid detection (35). Given that signal output in this strategy is based on the fluorescent readout of SG intercalated into SGBD, it is important to optimize the dumbbell probe concentration to improve the signal/background ratio of RCA. We found that RCA signals increased along with the concentration increment of D-12s-miR21 probe. For example, when the concentration of the D-12s-miR21 probe is ~1–10 nM, fluorescent signals for low-concentration targets (1 fM to 100 pM) were almost indistinguishable from the background, leading to relatively poor sensitivity as compared to the use of a 50-nM probe (Supplementary Figure S2). In addition, excessive dumbbell probe (250 nM) significantly increased the background as well, which decreased the signal: background ratio, and more importantly, made it difficult to quantify miRNA concentrations. Moreover, the stem length of the hairpin probe is also a key to the improvement of signal/background ratio of RCA since the fluorescent intensity of SG becomes higher and higher, proportional with the length increase of SGBD (33). Since the D-24s-miR21 probe with 24-bp stem structure has higher binding capacity for SG than that observed for the 12-bp stem structure (Supplementary Figure S1), we found that the 24-bp stem of the dumbbell probe caused a large background signal (Supplementary Figure S2).

Subsequently, we compared dumbbell probe-mediated RCA with linear-probe-mediated RCA to reveal the advantages of the D-RCA strategy (Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S3). As observed for linear probe-mediated RCA, the signal was very low until the target concentration reached 1 pM. In contrast, the signal of dumbbell probe-mediated RCA was significantly higher than negative control when the target concentration was only 1 fM, exhibiting a sensitivity improvement by three orders of magnitude.

Figure 2.
Comparison of the detection performance by using either linear or dumbbell probes (12- and 24-base stems).

Since miRNA families (e.g. let-7 family) often possess closely related sequences with high homology (1- or 2-nt difference) (36), it is thus important to evaluate the sequence specificity of our D-RCA strategy for miRNA analysis. We designed the sequence-specific probes for hsa-let-7d, hsa-let-7e and hsa-let-7f in the let-7 family, which differed by only 1 or 2 bases from each other (Supplementary Table S2). Importantly, we found that the specific dumbbell probes led to significantly higher fluorescence intensity than non-specific probes (P < 0.05), with an improvement by at least 3-fold for all interrogated let-7 miRNAs (Figure 3a and Supplementary Figure S4). Of note, the 1-base sequence specificity was poor when T4 DNA ligase was employed in the previous report (30), whereas use of T4 RNA ligase 2 realized high-specificity in the assay. The marked improvement of sequence specificity even with T4 DNA ligase in our work clearly shows the high stringency of the stem–loop structure in the probe, which brings about high sequence specificity due to the conformational constraint of the stem–loop (17,34).

Figure 3.
The performance of the D-RCA-based miRNA detection. (a) Three miRNAs, hsa-let-7d, 7e and 7f of 100 pM were employed to reveal the selectivity for a 1- or 2-base mismatch. (b) The concentration profile for the detection of miRNA hsa-miR-21 was in the range ...

Dynamic range is also important for accurate quantification of miRNA since the miRNA expression level varies greatly (10–50 000 copies/cell) in different cell lines and tissues (17,36,37). To evaluate the dynamic range of D-RCA, synthetic hsa-miR-21 was serially diluted to concentrations ranging from 1 fM to 100 nM and targeted with our D-RCA method (Figure 3b). Significantly, the fluorescence intensity gradually increased along with hsa-miR-21 concentration, leading to an impressively large dynamic range that spans eight orders of magnitude (1 fM to 100 nM). We also note that the fluorescence signal was significantly larger than the background (P < 0.05), even when the concentration of hsa-miR-21 was as low as 1 fM (>3 SD; Figure 3b, inset), suggesting that the detection limit of D-RCA method was at least 1 fM. In this regard, the D-RCA method has remarkable advantage over previously reported methods (Table 1).

Table 1.
The comparison for existing miRNA analysis methods

Given the high sensitivity, sequence specificity and large dynamic range of our D-RCA method, we attempted to employ this novel strategy to perform miRNA analysis in clinical samples. Recent studies have provided strong evidence that hsa-miR-21 is a biomarker candidate in colon cancer, which has significantly higher expression in CTT than in NAT (9). We then employed D-RCA to quantify the expression level of hsa-miR-21 in colon tumor and NAT. The samples (+L) and negative controls (−L) were performed either in the presence or in the absence of T4 DNA ligase. We found that the expression levels of hsa-miR-21 in CTTs were significantly higher than that detected in NAT (P < 0.05; Figure 4). The differentiation ratios of expression levels between CTT and NAT were 1.5, 2.0 and 2.3 in total RNA sample of 100 pg, 1 ng and 50 ng, respectively, with the dumbbell probe at a concentration of 50 nM. When the concentration of the dumbbell probe was decreased to 25 nM, we could still effectively differentiate CTT from NAT, which led to differentiation ratios of 2.7, 2.0 and 1.5 in a total RNA sample of 100 pg, 1 ng and 50 ng, respectively. Also of note, the background signals for negative controls were significantly lower than those observed in samples. It is thus important to note that our D-RCA method can reliably quantify miRNA directly in total RNA samples as few as 100 pg, which provide a highly sensitive approach for clinical diagnostics.

Figure 4.
The expression levels of hsa-miR-21 in total RNA samples with the dumbbell probe of (a) 50 nM and (b) 25 nM. Negative controls (−L) were performed with identical conditions in total RNA samples (+) without adding T4 DNA ligase. Statistical analysis ...

CONCLUSION

The D-RCA strategy described in this work shows promising capabilities of specific and sensitive analysis for miRNA expression. The advantages of D-RCA include: (i) the dumbbell probe integrates target-binding, amplification and signaling within one multifunctional design; (ii) the sensitivity of D-RCA compares favorably with other existing technologies that allows quantification of miRNA with a very low amount of RNA sample. More significantly, the dynamic range of D-RCA is extremely large, covering eight orders of magnitude; (iii) RCA is an isothermal amplification protocol that does not rely on expensive devices (e.g. PCR machine), which significantly reduces the cost of D-RCA assays. We expect that this highly sensitive and inexpensive D-RCA strategy will become a promising miRNA quantification method in clinical diagnostics.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available at NAR Online.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation (20725516, 90913014, 30871362 and 10975179); National Basic Research Program of China (2007CB936000); Ministry of Health (2009ZX10004-301); Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology (0952nm04600). Funding for open access charge: 2009ZX10004-301.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

Supplementary Material

[Supplementary Data]

REFERENCES

1. Ambros V. microRNAs: tiny regulators with great potential. Cell. 2001;107:823–826. [PubMed]
2. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–297. [PubMed]
3. Harfe BD. MicroRNAs in vertebrate development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005;15:410–415. [PubMed]
4. Jiang J, Lee EJ, Gusev Y, Schmittgen TD. Real-time expression profiling of microRNA precursors in human cancer cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:5394–5403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Gaur A, Jewell DA, Liang Y, Ridzon D, Moore JH, Chen C, Ambros VR, Israel MA. Characterization of microRNA expression levels and their biological correlates in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2456–2468. [PubMed]
6. Calin GA, Liu C-G, Sevignani C, Ferracin M, Felli N, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, Cimmino A, Zupo S, Dono M, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:11755–11760. [PubMed]
7. Murakami Y, Yasuda T, Saigo K, Urashima T, Toyoda H, Okanoue T, Shimotohno K. Comprehensive analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues. Oncogene. 2005;25:2537–2545. [PubMed]
8. Blenkiron C, Goldstein L, Thorne N, Spiteri I, Chin S-F, Dunning M, Barbosa-Morais N, Teschendorff A, Green A, Ellis I, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling of human breast cancer identifies new markers of tumor subtype. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R214. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Schetter AJ, Leung SY, Sohn JJ, Zanetti KA, Bowman ED, Yanaihara N, Yuen ST, Chan TL, Kwong DLW, Au GKH, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles associated with prognosis and therapeutic outcome in colon adenocarcinoma. JAMA. 2008;299:425–436. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. [PubMed]
11. Park S-J, Taton TA, Mirkin CA. Array-based electrical detection of DNA with nanoparticle probes. Science. 2002;295:1503–1506. [PubMed]
12. Sidransky D. Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of cancer. Science. 1997;278:1054–1058. [PubMed]
13. Li JJ, Chu Y, Lee BY-H, Xie XS. Enzymatic signal amplification of molecular beacons for sensitive DNA detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Liu G, Wan Y, Gau V, Zhang J, Wang L, Song S, Fan C. An enzyme-based E-DNA sensor for sequence-specific detection of femtomolar DNA targets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6820–6825. [PubMed]
15. Murakami T, Sumaoka J, Komiyama M. Sensitive isothermal detection of nucleic-acid sequence by primer generation-rolling circle amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e19. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Vet JAM, Majithia AR, Marras SAE, Tyagi S, Dube S, Poiesz BJ, Kramer FR. Multiplex detection of four pathogenic retroviruses using molecular beacons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:6394–6399. [PubMed]
17. Chen C, Ridzon DA, Broomer AJ, Zhou Z, Lee DH, Nguyen JT, Barbisin M, Xu NL, Mahuvakar VR, Andersen MR, et al. Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e179. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Raymond CK, Roberts BS, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, Johnson JM. Simple, quantitative primer-extension PCR assay for direct monitoring of microRNAs and short-interfering RNAs. RNA. 2005;11:1737–1744. [PubMed]
19. Valoczi A, Hornyik C, Varga N, Burgyan J, Kauppinen S, Havelda Z. Sensitive and specific detection of microRNAs by northern blot analysis using LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:e175. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Chen J, Lozach J, Garcia EW, Barnes B, Luo S, Mikoulitch I, Zhou L, Schroth G, Fan J-B. Highly sensitive and specific microRNA expression profiling using BeadArray technology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e87. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Liu C-G, Spizzo R, Calin GA, Croce CM. Expression profiling of microRNA using oligo DNA arrays. Methods. 2008;44:22–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Thomson JM, Parker J, Perou CM, Hammond SM. A custom microarray platform for analysis of microRNA gene expression. Nat. Methods. 2004;1:47–53. [PubMed]
23. Wang H, Ach RA, Curry B. Direct and sensitive miRNA profiling from low-input total RNA. RNA. 2007;13:151. [PubMed]
24. Castoldi M, Schmidt S, Benes V, Noerholm M, Kulozik AE, Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU. A sensitive array for microRNA expression profiling (miChip) based on locked nucleic acids (LNA) RNA. 2006;12:913. [PubMed]
25. Berezikov E, van Tetering G, Verheul M, van de Belt J, van Laake L, Vos J, Verloop R, van de Wetering M, Guryev V, Takada S. Many novel mammalian microRNA candidates identified by extensive cloning and RAKE analysis. Genome Res. 2006;16:1289. [PubMed]
26. Med B. SAGE detects microRNA precursors. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:285. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Dahl F, Banér J, Gullberg M, Mendel-Hartvig M, Landegren U, Nilsson M. Circle-to-circle amplification for precise and sensitive DNA analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:4548. [PubMed]
28. Kingsmore SF, Patel DD. Multiplexed protein profiling on antibody-based microarrays by rolling circle amplification. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003;14:74–81. [PubMed]
29. Jonstrup SP, Koch J, Kjems J. A microRNA detection system based on padlock probes and rolling circle amplification. RNA. 2006;12:1747. [PubMed]
30. Cheng Y, Zhang X, Li Z, Jiao X, Wang Y, Zhang Y. Highly sensitive determination of microRNA using target-primed and branched rolling-circle amplification. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:3268. [PubMed]
31. Mestdagh P, Feys T, Bernard N, Guenther S, Chen C, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. High-throughput stem-loop RT-qPCR miRNA expression profiling using minute amounts of input RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008:e143. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Wang L, Luo YZ, Zhang L, Jiao XM, Wang MB, Fan YL. Rolling circle amplification-mediated hairpin RNA (RMHR) library construction in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:e149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Zipper H, Brunner H, Bernhagen J, Vitzthum F. Investigations on DNA intercalation and surface binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:e103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Bonnet G, Tyagi S, Libchaber A, Kramer FR. Thermodynamic basis of the enhanced specificity of structured DNA probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:6171. [PubMed]
35. Kricka LJ. Nucleic acid detection technologies—labels, strategies, and formats. Clin. Chem. 1999;45:453. [PubMed]
36. Wark AW, Lee HJ, Corn RM. Multiplexed detection methods for profiling microRNA expression in biological samples. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:644. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Cummins JM, He Y, Leary RJ, Pagliarini R, Diaz LA, Sjoblom T, Barad O, Bentwich Z, Szafranska AE, Labourier E. The colorectal microRNAome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:3687. [PubMed]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press