Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(8): e12272.
Published online 2010 August 18. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0012272
PMCID: PMC2923623

Human Neural Stem Cells Differentiate and Promote Locomotor Recovery in an Early Chronic Spinal coRd Injury NOD-scid Mouse Model

Fabrizio Gelain, Editor



Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in partial or complete paralysis and is characterized by a loss of neurons and oligodendrocytes, axonal injury, and demyelination/dysmyelination of spared axons. Approximately 1,250,000 individuals have chronic SCI in the U.S.; therefore treatment in the chronic stages is highly clinically relevant. Human neural stem cells (hCNS-SCns) were prospectively isolated based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting for a CD133+ and CD24−/lo population from fetal brain, grown as neurospheres, and lineage restricted to generate neurons, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. hCNS-SCns have recently been transplanted sub-acutely following spinal cord injury and found to promote improved locomotor recovery. We tested the ability of hCNS-SCns transplanted 30 days post SCI to survive, differentiate, migrate, and promote improved locomotor recovery.

Methods and Findings

hCNS-SCns were transplanted into immunodeficient NOD-scid mice 30 days post spinal cord contusion injury. hCNS-SCns transplanted mice demonstrated significantly improved locomotor recovery compared to vehicle controls using open field locomotor testing and CatWalk gait analysis. Transplanted hCNS-SCns exhibited long-term engraftment, migration, limited proliferation, and differentiation predominantly to oligodendrocytes and neurons. Astrocytic differentiation was rare and mice did not exhibit mechanical allodynia. Furthermore, differentiated hCNS-SCns integrated with the host as demonstrated by co-localization of human cytoplasm with discrete staining for the paranodal marker contactin-associated protein.


The results suggest that hCNS-SCns are capable of surviving, differentiating, and promoting improved locomotor recovery when transplanted into an early chronic injury microenvironment. These data suggest that hCNS-SCns transplantation has efficacy in an early chronic SCI setting and thus expands the “window of opportunity” for intervention.


Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in partial or complete paralysis along with sensory loss below the level ofinjury. The pathology of SCI is characterized by the loss of neurons and oligodendrocytes, axonal injury, and demyelination/dysmyelination of spared axons. Therapeutic transplantation of stem cell populations may promote functional recovery by providing trophic support, modifying the host environment to create a permissive environment for endogenous regeneration/repair, or by replacing neurons and/or oligodendrocytes [1], [2].

SCI therapies can target acute, sub-acute, or chronic time points post-injury. The continuum from acute to chronic injury both in animal models and clinically is defined by the transition from a dynamic to a relatively stable injury environment, and when behavioral recovery reaches a plateau [3], [4], [5]. In rodent contusion injury models these criteria are met beginning at approximately 30 days post-injury (dpi) [3], [4], [5]. There are over 1,275,000 individuals living with chronic SCI in the U.S. alone (Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation Paralysis Resource Center); thus, a chronic transplantation model is highly clinically relevant.

Several studies have investigated chronic SCI models using whole tissue grafts and peripheral nervous system (PNS) cells. Transplantation of fetal spinal tissue, fetal brain cortex, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs), peripheral nerve grafts, and Schwann cells after SCI have all been shown to improve locomotor recovery [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], suggesting that the chronic post-injury period may be a feasible target for repair.

In contrast, the few studies that have compared sub-acute and chronic transplantation of CNS cell populations such as human oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) and mouse neural stem cells (NSCs) in chronic SCI models have not reported improved locomotor recovery [12], [13]. Human OPCs transplanted 7 dpi survived and promoted locomotor recovery; however, at 10 months post-injury, OPCs survived but failed to improve locomotor recovery [12]. Mouse NSCs transplanted 2 weeks post-SCI survived and improved locomotor recovery; however, at 2 months post-SCI, NSCs neither survived nor improved locomotor recovery [13].

Thus, while whole tissue grafts and PNS cells have shown some capacity for chronic stage repair (≥4 weeks post-SCI in rodents), CNS cell populations have thus far failed in the chronic setting. These studies suggest that the mechanism of cell transplant-mediated repair, the properties of specific cell transplant populations, and/or the microenvironment of the injured niche during the acute, sub-acute, and chronic periods may influence the potential to impact recovery post-SCI. Defining the potential window for successful engraftment and recovery in animal models with specific cell populations, particularly CNS populations, is therefore a critical step to developing therapeutics for chronic injuries.

We have previously reported that NOD-scid mice, which are constitutively immunodeficient, lacking a normal T-cell, B-cell, and complement response, exhibit similar SCI pathology and cellular innate immune response to other mouse strains (C57Bl/6 and BUB/BnJ) [14]. Accordingly, NOD-scid mice provide an excellent experimental model to investigate the potential of transplanted human cell populations to engraft and promote histological and locomotor recovery following SCI without a xenograft rejection response [15]. Furthermore, NOD-scid mice have been used as a host for induced pluripotent cells in the CNS as an assay for tumor formation and NSC transplantation studies [16], [17]. Hence, stem cell transplantation in the CNS using the NOD-scid model can provide tumorigenicity information. We have previously reported on the sub-acute transplantation of human neural stem cells (hCNS-SCns), which are lineage restricted to generate neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes, into a NOD-scid SCI model. hCNS-SCns are prospectively isolated based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for a CD133+ and CD24−/lo population from fetal brain and grown as neurospheres [18].

hCNS-SCns transplanted sub-acutely 9 dpi in immunodeficient NOD-scid mice successfully engrafted and improved long-term locomotor recovery compared to vehicle and human fibroblast (hFbs) control groups [19], [20]. Notably, recovery was abolished following selective ablation of hCNS-SCns using diphtheria toxin, demonstrating that survival of hCNS-SCns was required to sustain locomotor recovery [19]. The majority of hCNS-SCns exhibited differentiation to oligodendrocytes, and a smaller percentage differentiated into neurons, but few exhibited evidence of astrocytic fate [19]. This is in contrast to many studies that have demonstrated predominant astroglial fate or differentiation failure following acute or sub-acute NSCs transplantation, [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Furthermore, immuno-electron microscopy in the sub-acute study revealed that human cells remyelinated mouse host axons and formed putative synapses with mouse neurons, suggesting that transplanted hCNS-SCns had stably integrated within the functional cytoarchitecture of the host CNS [19].

In the present study, we tested whether hCNS-SCns transplanted into immunodeficient NOD-scid mice at an early chronic time point (30 dpi), survived, differentiated, and promoted locomotor recovery. We also investigated whether the animals experienced mechanical allodynia, and stereologically quantified the number of engrafted cells, lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area. Our results reveal that hCNS-SCns have the ability to survive, migrate, differentiate, and promote improved locomotor recovery when transplanted in the early chronic SCI microenvironment.


Ethics statement

All animal housing conditions, surgical procedures, and postoperative care was approved by and conducted according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines at the University of California, Irvine. The UC Irvine Human Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (UCI hSCRO) approved the use of human stem cells in this study.

Group design

Female mice were used in this study to avoid bladder complications and urolithiasis that frequently occur in male mice following SCI [14], [28]. Animal surgeries were done in parallel over multiple days. Prior to surgery, NOD-scid mice (n = 48) were tested by the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) to ensure normal locomotor function. One animal was excluded at this time because of abnormal gait. During the initial SCI surgery, one animal died and three additional animals were excluded because of surgical error. Pre-hoc criteria were established to exclude animals if any of the following conditions occurred: cord bruised or tearing of dura during laminectomy (n = 1); visual slippage of the mouse from the vertebral stabilization clamps (n = 0); abnormal time versus force curve indicating a bone hit or clamp slip (n = 1); or unilateral bruising of the cord (n = 1). Mice (n = 44) received BMS testing 2 dpi and weekly thereafter and were randomized into 3 balanced groups, to be transplanted with either vehicle control, hFbs, or hCNS-SCns, based upon their BMS scores at 28 dpi. To minimize the effect of variations in spinal cord damage, seven animals were excluded prior to transplantation because their BMS scores at 28 dpi were more than two standard deviations from the mean score. Thirty-seven mice were transplanted 30 dpi. Slightly more animals were included in the hCNS-SCns group for purposes of histological analysis; vehicle control (n = 11), hFbs (n = 11), and hCNS-SCns (n = 15). Following transplantation, four animals died prior to sacrifice, one from the vehicle group, two from the hFbs group, and one from the hCNS-SCns group. The final animal numbers per group were, vehicle (n = 10), hFbs (n = 9), and hCNS-SCns (n = 14).

Spinal Cord Injury

Female NOD-scid mice (transferred from StemCells Inc, the Jackson Laboratory, stock # 001303), 8–10 weeks of age were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (312.5 mg/kg i.p. bolus) and vertebral T9 exposed by laminectomy as previously described [29]. Mice received a 50-kDyne-contusion injury using the IH device (Precision Systems and Instrumentation LLC). After surgery, mice recovered overnight in cages with Alpha-Dri bedding (Newco Distributors Inc) placed on water-jacketed heating pads at 37°C. Mice were maintained on twice daily manual bladder expression for 2 weeks, followed by once daily manual bladder expression for the remaining survival period. Post-operative care included buprenorphine twice a day for 2 days, lactated ringers once a day for 4 days, and antibiotic daily for the duration of the study. All animals were maintained on rotating schedule of antibiotics; Baytril, Amoxicillin, and Cipro were each given for 2 weeks, and then rotated to the next antibiotic.

Transplantation surgery

Isolation and culture of hCNS-SCns from fetal brain tissue (gestational 16–20 weeks) have been previously described [18], [19], [30]. Briefly, FACS-sorted single cell suspensions were cultured in neurosphere initiation media consisting of Ex-Vivo 15 media with N2 supplement, FGF, EGF, LIF, neural survival factor-1, and NAC. Cells were propagated as neurospheres, fed weekly, and passaged every 2–3 weeks [18], [19], [30]. Human fibroblasts derived from fetal liver were grown to confluence in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium/10% FBS, dissociated with trypsin, washed and concentrated to 50,000 cells per µl. Thirty days post-injury, mice were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (312.5 mg/kg i.p. bolus), the laminectomy site re-exposed and hCNS-SCns or hFbs were transplanted. Four injections of 250 nl each, bilateral from the midline, both rostral and caudal to the injury epicenter were performed using a beveled glass (0.53 mm I.D, 1.14 mm O.D. Drummond Scientific Co.) micropipette (75–80 µm ID, 100–115 µm, 30° bevel Sutter Instrument Co.) and NanoInjector 2000 system (World Precision Instruments) delivering a total of 1 µl of hCNS-SCns at 75,000-cells/µl, or hFbs at 50,000-cells/µl in an injection buffer consisting of 50% Hanks' balanced salt solution and 50% X-vivo medium. Vehicle control mice received injection buffer alone. Mice received post-operative treatment as described above.


Open-field locomotor recovery was assessed using the BMS locomotor rating scale prior to injury, 2 days after injury, weekly for 4 weeks until transplantation, then weekly following transplantation until sacrifice. Briefly, mice were observed in the open-field for 4 minutes each by two individuals blinded to the experimental groups [31], [32]. Motor function of the hind limbs was rated, recorded, and converted to a score according to the published scale.

CatWalk Analysis

CatWalk video was recorded at 16 weeks post-transplantation. Individuals blinded to experimental groups analyzed video using CatWalk software version 6.13 for Windows [33].

Mechanical Allodynia

Von Frey hair testing of hind limbs was done at 15 weeks post-transplantation. Animals were tested for a withdrawal response to successively higher force filaments (Touch-Test Sensory Evaluators, North Coast Medical). The lowest filament from which an animal withdrew from was the threshold assigned for that animal [34]. After a positive response was elicited, the previous filament was tested to confirm a lack of response and the next filament was tested to confirm a positive response.

Histological Assessment

Sixteen weeks post-transplantation, mice were anesthetized using pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) and transcardially perfused with 15 mls of PBS followed by 100 mls of 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde. A T6-T12 segment of the spinal cord was dissected based on counting the dorsal spinal roots for all mice to obtain an anatomically consistent region of the spinal cord for stereological analysis. Spinal roots were identified by visualization of the features of C6, C7 and C8 root brachial plexus and exposure of the distal thoracic roots. Dissected T6-T12 spinal cord segments were post-fixed in a 20% sucrose/4% paraformaldehyde solution for cryoprotection overnight at 4°C. Following cryoprotection, spinal cords were frozen in isopentane at −65°C, and serial sliding microtome sections were collected free floating for immunocytochemical staining. Parasagittal sections (n = 6 per group) were collected at 30 µm for human cytoplasm and paranodal protein (CASPR) double immunofluorescence and stereological analysis of hCNS-SCns and hFbs survival and migration, lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area. Coronal sections (n = 3 per group) were collected at 50 µm for fate analysis. Immunocytochemistry was conducted as previously described [35] sampling throughout the T6–T12 segment of the spinal cord using anti-human cytoplasm marker (SC121-StemCells, Inc 1[ratio]4000), anti-GFAP marker (GFAP-Dako 1[ratio]60,000), anti-human GFAP marker (SC123-StemCells,Inc 1[ratio]3000) and visualized using diaminobenzidine (DAB; Vector Laboratories). For fluorescent labeling we utilized anti-human cytoplasm marker (SC121-StemCells, Inc 1[ratio]4000), anti-human nuclei marker (SC101- StemCells, Inc 1[ratio]100), anti-human nuclei marker (Millipore 1[ratio]200), anti-APC-CC1 marker (Calbiochem 1[ratio]4000), anti-human Olig2 (R&D Systems 1[ratio]100), anti-ß-tubulin-III (Convance 1[ratio]5000), anti-GFAP (Dako 1[ratio]30,000), anti-Nestin (Covance 1[ratio]1000), anti-Ki67 (Novocastra 1[ratio]1500), and anti-CASPR (Abcam 1[ratio]500). Secondary antibodies in double-labeling experiments were Alexa Fluor 488 and 555 (Molecular Probes 1[ratio]500). Fluorescent sections were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium for fluorescence with DAPI (Vector Laboratories).

Stereological Quantification

Stereology was conducted using an Olympus BX51 microscope with a motorized stage and StereoInvestigator software (MBF Biosciences, version 7.00.3). Survival of human cells, hCNS-SCns (n = 6) and hFbs (n = 5), was quantified by SC121 immunolabeling and methyl green nuclear counterstain using the optical fractionator probe and a 100× oil-immersion 1.30 numerical aperture objective. Human cells were quantified in the injury epicenter, spared tissue and sequential 1 mm segments rostral and caudal to the injury site. Systematic random sampling of the tissue was performed according to stereological principles. Starting sections were chosen at random and every sixth section thereafter was analyzed. Sampling parameters (grid and counting frame size) were empirically determined to achieve low coefficients of error (CE) for each measure. CE values are summarized in Table 1. Lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area were quantified using GFAP staining and the Cavalieri probe at 4× in all three groups using parasagittal sections, vehicle (n = 5), hFbs (n = 5), and hCNS-SCns (n = 6). Lesion volume was quantified as the area at the injury epicenter that was devoid of GFAP staining using a 100 µm grid. Spared tissue volume was quantified in 500 µm segments rostral and caudal of the injury epicenter using a 100 µm grid. Glial scar area was quantified by measuring the area of dense GFAP staining near the injury epicenter and excluding the lesion as defined by absence of GFAP staining using a 150 µm grid.

Table 1
Intra-animal variability in stereological analyses.

Quantification of human cell differentiation

hCNS-SCns differentiation was examined by double fluorescent labeling. Confocal imaging of fluorescent stained sections was conducted using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal system and Zeiss LSM 510 software (Version 4.0 SP2) with multi-track scanning. Three animals for each protein marker were utilized. For quantification of each protein marker, starting sections were chosen at random and every twelfth coronal section thereafter was stained. From the 1 in 12 sampling of sections stained, the ten consecutive sections that contained the most human cells were utilized for fate analysis. In each of the ten consecutive sections, ten fields were imaged using a 63× objective and 2× digital zoom. The number of human cells, and double-labeled cells were counted for each series using ImageJ Version 10.2 software with a cell counter plug-in. The number of double-labeled cells is expressed as a percentage of the total number of human cells counted in each individual series. For each protein marker analyzed, the values from three animals are averaged together to get the final percentage.

Statistical Analysis

All means are expressed ± the standard error of the mean. For BMS, repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare scores of vehicle, hFbs, and hCNS-SCns transplanted animals. For BMS, linear single degree of freedom contrast statistics and a Bonferroni/Dunn post-hoc analysis was utilized to determine significance at the termination of the study (week 16). Chi-square analysis was utilized to assess the observed frequency of animals recovering coordination in the open field with a Fisher's exact test. CatWalk gait analysis of swing speed was analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD post-hoc test. A one-way ANOVA was used to assess von Frey, lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area for differences between the three groups. StatView (version 5.0.1) and Prism (version 5.0a) were used for statistical analysis; significance was defined as p≤0.05.


hCNS-SCns promote locomotor recovery

To investigate whether hCNS-SCns can contribute to long-term locomotor recovery in an early chronic SCI model mice received grafts of hCNS-SCns, hFbs, or a vehicle control injection 30 days post contusion injury. All mice were pre-tested for baseline locomotor performance using the BMS prior to SCI and any animals with locomotor deficits were excluded prior to injury (Fig. 1A). After SCI, mice were tested at 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28 dpi, and then weekly following transplantation until sacrifice. Prior to transplantation, mice were randomized into 3 groups based upon BMS scores at 28 dpi, so that each group started with a similar score as described under methods. hCNS-SCns transplanted mice exhibited significantly improved locomotor recovery compared to vehicle control mice; repeated measures ANOVA p≤0.0022 (F = 1.952), Bonferroni/Dunn posthoc analysis at week 16 p≤0.02. There were no significant differences in repeated measures ANOVA between hFbs and either the hCNS-SCns or vehicle control groups. BMS scores were further analyzed using a test of the interaction of the groups across time following transplantation, which was significant (p = 0.002), indicating that the group means changed differently over time. To further characterize what the changes across time were, a linear contrast of the interaction term was determined and was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001), indicating that the groups made linear changes across time with different slopes. Finally, the slope of each group was investigated individually. Based on adjustments for multiple testing, the p-value required to reach significance in this analysis was p≤0.0167. While the vehicle group exhibited a non-significant trend for a linear decrease in means over time (p = 0.023) and the hFbs group exhibited no linear change in means over time (p = 0.115), the hCNS-SCns exhibited a significant linear increase in means over time (p = 0.001) suggesting that only hCNS-SCns treated animals had significantly improved recovery over the 16 weeks following transplantation. At 16 weeks post-transplant (termination of the study) the average BMS scores per group were: hCNS-SCns (n = 14) 6.4±0.4; hFbs (n = 9) 5.6±0.6; and vehicle treated animals (n = 10) 4.8±0.5. These scores correspond to improvement in the frequency of coordinated steps between fore and hind limbs for hCNS-SCns vs. vehicle groups.

Figure 1
hCNS-SCns promote improved locomotor recovery on multiple tests.

Because BMS scores showed differences in the recovery of coordination between groups, we used chi square frequency analysis to compare the number of animals in each group that had regained at least occasional coordination between fore and hind limbs on open-field behavior testing. Data is expressed as the percentage of animals that exhibited coordination between fore and hind limbs out of the total number of animals per group (Fig. 1B). 64% of hCNS-SCns mice recovered coordination compared to 44% for hFbs mice and 20% for vehicle control mice. Recovery of coordination was significantly increased in hCNS-SCns transplanted animals compared to vehicle controls using chi square analysis for observed frequency (p = 0.047, Fisher's Exact Test). No statistically significant differences were found comparing hFbs with either vehicle or hCNS-SCns transplanted mice.

As a supplemental quantitative measure of locomotor recovery, CatWalk gait analysis was performed in a subset of animals at 16 weeks post-transplant prior to sacrifice. CatWalk gait analysis showed that hCNS-SCns treated animals (n = 10) had significantly improved swing speed 1.21 m/s±0.06 compared to vehicle controls (n = 8) 1.05 m/s±0.06 (p<0.04 ANOVA, Fisher's PLSD) (Fig. 1C). However, hFbs treated mice (n = 8) 1.13 m/s±0.04 did not exhibit significant differences from either vehicle control or hCNS-SCns treated mice. Taken together, these data suggest that hCNS-SCns were able to promote improved behavioral recovery following early chronic transplantation.

hCNS-SCns do not contribute to allodynia

Recent studies have suggested that predominant astrocytic differentiation of transplanted NSCs is associated with the development of allodynia [21], [36], defined as increased sensitivity to stimuli that are normally not noxious, whether improved locomotor recovery was observed or not. In one study [36], allodynia was correlated to the number of NSCs that differentiated into astrocytes. We assessed hind limb mechanical allodynia 15 weeks post-transplant to determine the lowest threshold force from which animals withdrew their paw. Vehicle treated animals exhibited a threshold of 6.0 g±1.0 (n = 9), hFbs 6.0 g±0.5 (n = 9), and hCNS-SCns treated animals 6.4 g±1.4 (n = 10) (Fig. 1D). None of the groups were significantly different from one another by one-way ANOVA (p≥0.94), suggesting that hCNS-SCns treated animals did not have an altered threshold of response to mechanical allodynia as a result of hCNS-SCns transplantation.

hCNS-SCns survive, engraft, and migrate within the injured spinal cord

To investigate the survival and migration of transplanted cells, mice were sacrificed 16 weeks post-transplantation and engrafted human cells detected using an antibody to human cytoplasm (SC121) (Fig. 2A–E). All transplanted animals exhibited successful human cell engraftment. There were no human cells present in vehicle treated animals and relatively few engrafted hFbs in hFbs transplanted animals, but numerous engrafted hCNS-SCns (Fig. 2A–C). hCNS-SCns were found in both gray and white matter, and the cells were morphologically distinct across these regions. Cells found in the white matter had elongated oligodendrocyte-like morphology (Fig. 2D), while those in the gray matter exhibited neuronal morphologies (Fig. 2E). Engrafted cells were distributed throughout gray and white matter of the cord with no evidence of abnormal morphology or any mass formation indicative of tumorigenesis.

Figure 2
Transplanted hFbs survive and hCNS-SCns survive and migrate extensively.

The number of surviving cells was quantified stereologically using the optical fractionator probe. The initial transplant contained 75,000 hCNS-SCns per animal; stereological estimates of hCNS-SCns (n = 6) revealed an average of 215,711±48,978 hCNS-SCns present 16 weeks following transplantation (Fig. 2F). These values represent an approximately 3-fold increase in the initial cell population transplanted. The initial hFbs transplant contained 50,000 cells; stereological estimates of hFbs engraftment (n = 5) revealed an average of 11,701±3070 hFbs present 16 weeks following transplantation (Fig. 2F). These values represent a near 4-fold decrease of the initial cell population transplanted and suggest that hFbs did not survive well, nor did they proliferate.

During the sub-acute period a glial scar forms that includes growth inhibitory chondroitin-sulfate proteglycans (CSPGs) [37], [38], [39]. The properties of the glial scar and CSPGs contribute to an environment that is inhibitory to axonal regeneration and neurite outgrowth and has been suggested to prevent migration of transplanted cell populations [40], [41]. We have previously demonstrated glial scar formation and CSPG deposition (NG2 and Versican) in NOD-scid mice following SCI suggesting the NOD-scid SCI model presents an inhibitory proteoglycan environment to transplanted hCNS-SCns [30]. Accordingly, we investigated whether migration of hCNS-SCns and hFbs occurred following transplantation in the early chronic injury environment in which the glial scar and associated CSPGs are present. Migration of both hCNS-SCns and hFbs was assessed within the root dissected injury segments of the cord (T6–T12) that extends approximately 8 mm rostral and 5 mm caudal from the injury epicenter, including the spared tissue around the injury epicenter (vertical dashed line, Fig. 2G). The spared tissue area was defined as the intact region of cord surrounding the methyl green positive dense lesion core. We also quantified surviving cells within the lesion core, which both hCNS-SCns and hFbs tended to avoid. In this region, we counted only 5728±1317 hCNS-SCns and 303±169 hFbs, mostly localized to the lesion rim and rarely localized in the histological epicenter (Fig. 2G). hCNS-SCns migrated much further than hFbs, up to 8 mm rostral and 5 mm caudal compared to 2 mm rostral and 2 mm caudal for hFbs (Fig. 2G). At the distal rostral segments there were an average of 384 and 697 hCNS-SCns at 8 and 7 mm, respectively and at the distal caudal segments 1019 and 244 hCNS-SCns on average at 4 and 5 mm respectively. hCNS-SCns were concentrated in the spared tissue area and up to 4 mm rostral to the injury and 2 mm caudal. Similarly, hFbs were concentrated in the spared tissue area and up to 2 mm rostral to the injury, but hFbs did not migrate any further in the rostral direction and few cells were found in the region up to 2 mm caudal to the injury. The furthest rostral segments that hFbs migrated to contained an average of 3039 and 5769 hFbs at 5 and 4 mm, respectively and at the most caudal segment there were an average of 423 and 357 hFbs at 1 and 2 mm respectively. Both cell populations were more prominent rostral to the injury rather than caudal. Quantification revealed robust engraftment and migration of hCNS-SCns transplanted into an early chronic model of SCI.

hCNS-SCns differentiate into all 3 CNS cell types

To investigate how the early chronic injured environment influenced the cell fate of engrafted hCNS-SCns, we assessed the fate and differentiation of hCNS-SCns by double immunofluorescence and confocal analysis in a subset of hCNS-SCns transplanted animals that were sectioned coronally. We investigated whether hCNS-SCns exhibited active cell division/proliferation by double labeling for SC121 and Ki67 and observed occasional co-localization (Fig. 3A–E). To determine whether any hCNS-SCns retained an immature phenotype we double labeled with SC121 and nestin and observed many co-localized cells (Fig. 3F–J). We next sought to determine whether engrafted human cells differentiated along oligodendroglial, neuronal, or astrocytic lineages. We investigated both immature and mature oligodendrocyte differentiation by double labeling for human nuclei and Olig2 to assess differentiation to immature oligodendrocytes (Fig. 4A–E) and APC-CC1 to examine mature oligodendrocytes (Fig. 4F–J). We observed hCNS-SCns double-labeled for both oligodendroglial markers. SC121-positive cells also co-localized with the neuronal marker β-tubulin III neurons suggesting hCNS-SCns differentiated into neurons (Fig. 4K–O). Few SC121 immunopositive cells co-localized with GFAP suggesting rare astrocytic differentiation (Fig. 4P–T).

Figure 3
hCNS-SCns express Ki67 and nestin 16 weeks following transplantation.
Figure 4
hCNS-SCns mostly differentiate into oligodendrocytes and neurons, and few astrocytes.

We investigated the percentage of human cells that exhibited evidence of active cell division/proliferation by double labeling for SC121 and Ki67. 2.9%±1.06 of SC121 positive human cells exhibited double labeling for Ki67 (Fig. 5), suggesting that there is limited proliferation of hCNS-SCns 16 weeks post-transplantation. Double labeling of SC121 and nestin revealed 31.1%±3.23 of SC121-positive cells retained nestin expression, suggesting that many human cells at 16 weeks post-transplantation remain immature (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
hCNS-SCns differentiation/fate quantification 16 weeks post-transplantation.

We next sought to determine the percentage of engrafted human cells that differentiated along oligodendroglial, neuronal, or astrocytic lineages. Quantification revealed 34.4%±6.38 exhibited differentiation along the more immature Olig2-positive oligodendrocyte lineage and 13.8%±1.0 of human cells differentiated into mature APC-CC1 positive oligodendrocytes (Fig. 5). Together, differentiation along an oligodendrocyte lineage comprised 40.78% of the human cells, which was the predominant fate of transplanted hCNS-SCns. 38.1%±0.85 of SC121-positive cells differentiated into β-tubulin III neurons, suggesting nearly as many hCNS-SCns differentiated into neurons as oligodendrocytes (Fig. 5). Few SC121 immunopositive cells differentiated into GFAP positive astrocytes, 8.0%±1.0 (Fig. 5).

Human myelinated host axons co-localize with contactin-associated protein

hCNS-SCns in the white matter exhibited predominant oligodendrocyte differentiation while ß-tubulin III co-localization with SC121 was predominantly found within the gray matter and processes rarely extended to the white matter. We previously reported evidence that sub-acutely transplanted hCNS-SCns remyelinated host axons, we sought to determine whether we could visualize integration of human oligodendrocytes with the host within white matter [19]. CASPR is highly localized to the paranodal region of myelinated axons and can be used as an index of myelin integrity [42], [43], [44]; previous studies have demonstrated that CASPR has a compact paranodal restricted staining pattern in uninjured axons (Fig. 6A arrows) and this compact pattern becomes more diffusely distributed along the axon following SCI (Fig. 6A arrowheads) [43]. To visualize human myelinated host axons, we performed double immunofluorescence and confocal analysis for the human cytoplasmic marker SC121 (red) and CASPR (green) on parasagittal spinal cord sections 16 weeks following transplantation (Fig. 6). Staining revealed human myelinated host axons co-localized with compact CASPR in the white matter expressing paranodal proteins in the correct loci, suggesting hCNS-SCns integrated with the host.

Figure 6
Human cytoplasm co-localizes with paranodal protein CASPR.

hCNS-SCns do not affect lesion volume, spared tissue volume, or glial scar area

While the presumptive strategy behind transplantation of stem cell populations for SCI has been cell replacement via integration as myelinating cells or new neurons, it is increasingly clear that transplanted cells can have a variety of effects on the host microenvironment including axonal regeneration and white matter sparing [9], [27], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]. To investigate the potential effects of early chronic transplantation on host parameters we assessed lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area using methodology that we have previously employed that detected differences between complement knockout and wild type mice [28]. We have previously shown that hCNS-SCns transplantation 9 dpi did not alter host parameters of injury or repair [30]. We investigated host parameters of injury histologically by staining for the glial scar marker GFAP (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, using an antibody specific to human-GFAP (SC123) we investigated whether human astrocytes contributed to the host lesion or glial scar (Fig. 7B). The few human-GFAP cells observed were primarily localized near the injury epicenter (Fig. 7B). In the present study, lesion volume was quantified stereologically using the Cavalieri estimator probe in tissue stained for GFAP and counterstained with methyl green (Fig. 7A). Lesion volume was defined as the methyl green dense area devoid of GFAP staining (Fig. 7A), depicted with a blue outline. Vehicle treated animals had an average lesion volume of 0.18 mm3±0.06 (n = 5), hFbs treated animals 0.16 mm3±0.03 (n = 5), and hCNS-SCns treated animals 0.19 mm3±0.05 (n = 6). One-way ANOVA (p≥0.91) revealed no significant difference between any of the groups (Fig. 7C). We also quantified spared tissue, defined by 500 µm segments both rostral and caudal of the injury epicenter, excluding the lesion itself using Cavalieri estimator probe, (Fig. 7A gray box). Vehicle treated animals had an average spared tissue volume of 0.77 mm3±0.11 (n = 5), hFbs treated animals 0.99 mm3±0.05 (n = 5), and hCNS-SCns treated animals 1.00 mm3±0.11 (n = 6). There were no significant differences between any of the groups, one-way ANOVA (p≥0.21) (Fig. 7D). Glial scar area, defined as the dense GFAP staining surrounding the injury epicenter excluding the lesion core, depicted with a black outline, (Fig. 7A) was quantified stereologically using the Cavalieri estimator probe in all three groups to determine whether hCNS-SCns contributed to the glial scar (Fig. 7E). Vehicle treated animals had an average glial scar area of 4.11 mm2±0.80 (n = 5), hFbs treated animals 4.19 mm2±1.00 (n = 5), and hCNS-SCns treated animals 4.32 mm2±0.67 (n = 6). There were no significant differences in glial scar area between any of the groups (one-way ANOVA p≥0.98) suggesting that hCNS-SCns treatment neither exacerbated nor reduced the glial scar (Fig. 7E). Taken together, these data suggest that hCNS-SCns do not influence the lesion or spared tissue volumes, or glial scar area. We also assessed whether there were any correlations between lesion volume, spared tissue volume, or glial scar area with the number of engrafted hCNS-SCns. There were no significant correlations for any of these comparisons (data not shown).

Figure 7
hCNS-SCns transplantation does not alter lesion volume, spared tissue volume, or glial scar area.


hCNS-SCns promote locomotor recovery

Our findings reveal hCNS-SCns transplanted into early chronic spinal cord injured NOD-scid mice survived, proliferated, and differentiated primarily into oligodendrocytes and neurons. This is the first study, to our knowledge, transplanting NSCs into early chronic SCI in which observed improved behavioral recovery has been detected. We assessed behavior via open-field locomotor testing (BMS) and CatWalk gait analysis. Our results showed improved recovery on BMS that was specifically enhanced in the range of coordination; hCNS-SCns treated mice exhibited a greater frequency of coordination compared to vehicle treated animals. Additionally, hCNS-SCns treated animals demonstrated improved swing speed compared to vehicle controls. hCNS-SCns transplantation did not result in detectable hind limb allodynia. Furthermore, transplanted hCNS-SCns had no measurable effect on lesion volume, spared tissue volume, or glial scar area. Taken together, these data suggest that stem cell transplantation can be successful outside the sub-acute time window and may be a potential therapeutic strategy for SCI at more chronic time points than commonly predicted.

Human fibroblasts as a cellular control

In addition to a vehicle control we also utilized human fibroblasts as a cellular control in this study to assess whether the integration and differentiation of hCNS-SCns promotes improved recovery or whether any transplanted cell might affect behavioral recovery in either a detrimental or beneficial manner. Transplanted hFbs survived in all animals, but showed poor engraftment, with fewer than 25% of the initial transplanted population surviving 16 weeks later. Furthermore, hFbs did not migrate far, remaining near transplant sites. As we previously observed in a sub-acute transplant paradigm transplanting both hCNS-SCns and hFbs, animals receiving hFbs were intermediate in locomotor recovery between vehicle controls and hCNS-SCns transplanted animals, albeit non-significantly [19]. Taken together with the present study, the consistency of this finding suggests that hFbs do exert some effect on the injured spinal cord. hFbs could potentially improve locomotor recovery by secreting trophic factors that provide support to the injured cord. While it is clear there was limited survival and migration of hFbs, the data in this study cannot distinguish whether hFbs exhibited poor survival post-transplantation, or poor engraftment over time in the injured microenvironment. Perhaps greater engraftment of hFbs could also produce recovery of locomotor function following SCI, if it could be achieved. However, the lack of robust survival or proliferation of this cell population when transplanted into the parenchyma adjacent to the SCI epicenter, even in the absence of xenograft rejection suggests that this may not be possible.

hCNS-SCns successfully engraft and migrate

Successful engraftment in CNS transplantation studies is very difficult to achieve, especially for xenografts. Currently, little is known about the dynamics of stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration in the SCI microenvironment because few studies have assessed these parameters. Furthermore, many studies fail to achieve adequate control of host immunorejection, making the assessment of these parameters very difficult. For stem cells to engraft in a therapeutically meaningful way, they need to survive both the initial transplantation and host-mediated rejection. The few studies that have quantified engraftment, in immunosuppressed xenograft or allograft models, as an endpoint report between 0.1% to 37% of the initial transplanted cells detected at time of sacrifice [6], [13], [36], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]. Additionally, few studies report the percentage of transplanted animals that are engrafted at the termination of the study, but under standard immunosuppression methods this is often as low as 50–60% in CNS injury models [57]. Because many studies fail to achieve successful engraftment this may explain why there has yet to be a successful report of NSCs improving recovery in a delayed transplant paradigm.

In contrast, constitutively immunodeficient animals yield better engraftment success, a study transplanting human NSCs into athymic nude rats quantified 275% more cells than initially transplanted [58]. Our studies have used NOD-scid mice, which are constitutively immunodeficient, lacking a normal T-cell, B-cell, and complement response. We have recently published a characterization of lesion volume, the innate immune response, and locomotor recovery in male and female NOD-scid mice in comparison with C57Bl/6 and BUB/BnJ mice [14], and report that NOD-scid mice do not exhibit differences in lesion characteristics and are within the range of strain variation for both macrophage and neutrophil responses. Therefore, despite the congenital deficiency in the adaptive immune response the cellular innate immune system is intact. While these mice also exhibit a partial complement deficiency (C5), this is true for most other mouse strains, including C57/Bl6, with the exception of BUB/BnJs [28]. Furthermore, NOD-scid mice have been used as a host for induced pluripotent cells in the CNS as an assay for tumor formation as well as NSC transplantation [16], [17]. Tumor formation is much more likely to occur in the absence of a rejection response therefore, NOD-scid mice allow for detection of tumor formation or abnormal growth of transplanted stem cell populations. However, one disadvantage of using NOD-scid mice is that due to the rate of spontaneous fatal thymoma formation the average lifespan of NOD-scid mice is roughly 8.5 months (34 weeks) limiting the length of studies that can be performed [59], [60]. Accordingly, NOD-scid mice provide an excellent experimental model to investigate the potential of transplanted human cell populations to engraft and promote histological and locomotor recovery following SCI without a xenograft rejection response [15]. As demonstrated in our sub-acute study, NOD-scid mice allowed for successful engraftment in 100% of transplanted animals [19]. Furthermore, upon sacrifice stereological quantification revealed 90% more hCNS-SCns than initially transplanted, demonstrating that this model permits proliferation [30]. The NOD-scid model has similar injury pathology to other mice strains but allows for successful engraftment and therefore an ability to assess the potential that human cell transplantation may have in experimental models of SCI.

In the present study, we assessed survival and migration of transplanted hCNS-SCns utilizing unbiased stereological quantification. All transplanted animals exhibited successful engraftment. Furthermore, we found 187% more hCNS-SCns than initially transplanted had successfully engrafted 16 weeks post-transplant, suggesting the transplanted cells are capable of limited proliferation. We also found long-distance migration from transplantation sites. Notably the engrafted cells avoid the lesion but occupy the spared tissue around the lesion. The cells migrated up to 8 mm rostrally and 5 mm in the caudal direction. Interestingly, more cells were found rostrally compared to caudally. This may be due to the rostral cord still receiving connections from the brain possibly contributing to a more trophic environment for transplanted cells. Conversely, a recent study suggested that regenerated sensory axons 6–8 months post-SCI remained unmyelinated rostral to injury but were myelinated caudally [61]. This may suggest that rostrally there is a need for oligodendrocyte replacement for remyelination of spontaneously regenerating or reorganizing sensory afferents. Therefore, the rostral migration and oligodendrocyte differentiation of transplanted hCNS-SCns may be filling this niche. hCNS-SCns transplanted into early chronic mouse SCI showed extensive engraftment, long-distance migration, and limited proliferation.

hCNS-SCns differentiate into oligodendrocytes and neurons

Approximately 31% of hCNS-SCns remained nestin positive suggesting that they remain undifferentiated, however of the cells that differentiated the majority differentiated along the oligodendrocyte lineage expressing the immature Olig2 marker or the mature APC-CC1 marker (41%) and nearly as many differentiated into ß-tubulin III-positive neurons (38%). The sum of all quantification markers was 128% suggesting there is overlap between some of the markers. Nestin, in particular has been found to co-localize with Olig2, β-tubulin III, and GFAP [62], [63]. Additionally, there could potentially be some overlap between Olig2 and APC-CC1 as cells are maturing along the oligodendrocyte lineage [64]. Interestingly, we observed increased neuronal differentiation in animals transplanted at 30 dpi compared to 9 dpi. hCNS-SCns may be responding to cues in the host microenvironment that are altered between these two time points resulting in the increased neuronal population. One of the variables changing over time following SCI is the continued influx of inflammatory cells. Our laboratory has recent data suggesting a delayed wave of infiltrating neutrophils, macrophages/microglia, and T-cells beginning about 21 dpi in Sprague-Dawley rat spinal cords and continuing through 6 months post-injury [65]. Post-mortem studies investigating human SCI tissue have also revealed the presence of macrophages chronically [66]. The cell types that are present in the spinal cord microenvironment at the time of cell transplantation and during differentiation may influence the fate of transplanted cells. Further studies investigating the factors that could contribute to increased neuronal differentiation when transplanting in the chronic SCI microenvironment are in progress. Furthermore, in contrast to many other studies that report predominant astrocytic differentiation after transplantation of NSCs into SCI models [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] only about 8% of transplanted hCNS-SCns differentiated into astrocytes. Several studies from our lab and others have transplanted NSCs after SCI and also observed rare astrocytic differentiation [13], [19], [58]. Interestingly, these studies that observed rare astrocytic fate quantified at least 30% of transplanted cells successfully engrafted, potentially suggesting an immunological effect due to failure to prevent host immune rejection may promote astrocytic differentiation. However, there are many other variables that may promote astrocytic differentiation of transplanted NSCs after SCI including the source of transplanted NSCs, the culturing techniques, and cell preparation as well as potential differences between injury models. Further studies to elucidate the mechanisms resulting in astrocytic fate of transplanted NSCs are necessary and ongoing in our laboratory. Finally, a small percentage (2.9%) expressed Ki67 at the terminal time-point indicating that there is some limited continuing proliferation 16 weeks post-transplantation. However, no evidence of excessive proliferation, clusters of proliferating cells, or tumor formation was observed in any transplanted animals. NOD-scid mice have previously been used as a host for transplanted induced pluripotent cells and NSCs in the CNS as an assay for tumor formation [16], [17]. Tumor formation is much more likely to occur in the absence of a rejection response therefore, NOD-scid mice optimally allow for detection of tumor formation or abnormal growth of transplanted stem cell populations. Further studies investigating the kinetics of proliferation and migration at earlier time points following transplantation are in progress.

hCNS-SCns integrate with the host

Because SC121-positive cells in the white matter predominantly differentiated into oligodendrocytes, co-localization of the human cytoplasmic marker SC121 with the paranodal protein CASPR within the white matter of the spinal cord is suggestive of host mouse axons remyelinated by hCNS-SCns that have differentiated into oligodendrocytes. ß-tubulin III co-localization with SC121 was predominantly found within the gray matter and processes rarely extended to the white matter. Despite SC121-positive axons rarely extending into the white matter the possibility that some of the observed co-localization with CASPR could represent myelination of these fibers by the host, cannot be excluded. Nonetheless, either case suggests that hCNS-SCns integrated with the host in this early chronic transplant paradigm. The mechanism of recovery is not known but integration of hCNS-SCns and remyelination of host axons is one possibility. Additional studies are necessary to further characterize the individual contributions of oligodendroglial and neuronal differentiation of hCNS-SCns in mediating locomotor recovery and establishing a mechanism of recovery. Critically, the CASPR staining pattern revealed both compact and diffuse CASPR, indicative of both normally myelinated and dysmyelinated axons 20 weeks after SCI in accordance with previous studies [43]. This suggests that dysmyelinated areas remain in the chronic SCI environment in NOD-scid mice, however the functional status of those axons cannot be determined [42]. It will be important to further characterize myelin pathology in the chronically injured spinal cord, however, the co-localization of SC121 and CASPR in this study suggest that it is possible to achieve hCNS-SCns-mediated remyelination of at least a subset of these fibers after transplantation in this early chronic SCI model which could contribute to recovery of function.

hCNS-SCns do not affect lesion volume, spared tissue volume, or glial scar area

While the presumptive strategy behind transplantation of stem cell populations for SCI has been cell replacement via integration as myelinating cells or new neurons, it is increasingly clear that transplanted cells can have a variety of effects on the host microenvironment. In the present study, we investigated lesion volume, spared tissue volume, and glial scar area to determine whether chronically transplanted hCNS-SCns affected any of these host parameters. Because we observed improved recovery, we might expect the lesion size to be decreased [50], [67]. Alternatively, we might have expected transplanted cells to mediate recovery by increased sparing of white matter around the lesion [68]. We also investigated glial scar area to determine whether hCNS-SCns had reduced the size of the scar [49], [50]. Alternatively, hCNS-SCns that differentiated into astrocytes could have exacerbated the host glial scar. Stereological quantification of these parameters revealed no differences between hCNS-SCns and control groups. In a subsequent analysis of hCNS-SCns animals transplanted sub-acutely [19], lesion volume, tissue sparing, glial scarring, sprouting of host serotonergic fibers, and angiogenesis were investigated utilizing unbiased stereological quantification and no significant differences were detected between control and hCNS-SCns transplanted animals on any of these parameters [30]. Taken together with the sub-acute study and the effect of human cell ablation resulting in loss of locomotor recovery, these data support the hypothesis that hCNS-SCns transplantation after SCI mediates functional recovery by cellular integration with the host and not by overt modification of the host microenvironment.

Chronic transplantation

Effective therapeutic NSC transplantation after SCI may only be possible if the transplanted cell population is capable of extensive migration, enabling cells to reach demyelinated and dysmyelinated axons and/or spared circuitry above and below the injury. Transplanted hCNS-SCns migrated multiple vertebral levels away from the transplantation site. Since there was significant oligodendroglial differentiation and we have previously demonstrated hCNS-SCns are capable of remyelination in vivo, one potential concern for chronic transplantation is whether demyelinated/dysmyelinated axons persist chronically [42]. Mammalian SCI models have exhibited evidence for chronic demyelination/dysmyelination in surviving and regenerating axons [43], [61], [69], [70], [71], suggesting remyelination as a viable therapeutic target in chronic SCI. Additionally, studies examining naturally occurring SCI in cats and dogs have found axons that are demyelinated up to 12 weeks post-injury [72]. In human chronic SCI tissue demyelinated and/or dysmyelinated fibers were observed [73], [74], [75]. Additionally, myelination during critical phases in the sub-acute and early chronic stages post-SCI could enhance axon sparing [42], [76], resulting in preservation of function. Remyelination may be a viable target for chronic transplantation, but may depend on timing in the acute to chronic injury continuum and requires further exploration. One could speculate that the preferential distribution of hCNS-SCns rostral to the epicenter and predominant oligodendrocyte fate could reflect a niche generated by the persistence of chronically demyelinated/dysmyelinated spared axons.

Collectively, following both sub-acute and early chronic transplantation we have shown that the predominant hCNS-SCns differentiation is oligodendroglial and survival of hCNS-SCns is required to sustain locomotor recovery, suggesting that oligodendrocyte integration with the host is likely a key mechanism of recovery [19]. However, the mechanism is not known and alternative pathways of hCNS-SCns-mediated repair must also be considered. We observed 26% of hCNS-SCns differentiated into neurons following sub-acute transplantation while 38% differentiated into neurons following early chronic transplantation suggesting a neuronal contribution [19]. Neuronal differentiation of transplanted hCNS-SCns could promote restoration of disrupted circuitry by formation of bridge or bypass connections. Neuronal replacement may be particularly useful in cervical SCI, where loss of motor neurons at the level of damage produce specific deficits, e.g. decreased triceps control. Neuronal differentiation could also provide trophic support to enhance neuroprotection and regeneration, or alter recruitment of endogenous progenitors that could contribute to repair processes. Additionally, NSCs can secrete a variety of neurotrophins in vitro and in vivo, including GDNF and NGF [77], [78]. Furthermore, human NSCs that exhibited neuronal differentiation have been shown to secrete GDNF following transplantation into traumatic brain injury [79]. Similarly, BDNF, GDNF, and NGF were present in higher amounts in human NSC transplanted animals that exhibited neuronal differentiation compared to controls following SCI [58]. Thus, despite predominant oligodendrocyte differentiation of hCNS-SCns, contributions of neuronal differentiation to improved locomotor recovery cannot be ruled out.

Previous studies have suggested SCI transplantation is more effective sub-acutely rather than chronically [12], [13], [54], [80]. However, our results suggest early chronic transplantation can still be effective for successful engraftment, differentiation to non-astrocytic lineages, and improvement of locomotor recovery. However, it is important to note that 30 dpi is a relatively “early” chronic time point and greater delays should be investigated. A relatively small proportion of the total SCI cases are new injuries that could benefit from potential acute therapies. If chronic therapies were developed, a much greater proportion of the SCI population would have the potential to benefit.


The results of this study suggest that hCNS-SCns are capable of surviving and differentiating when transplanted in an early chronic injured microenvironment. The transplanted cells are not restricted to an astrocytic lineage and differentiate predominantly into oligodendrocytes and neurons. Furthermore, hCNS-SCns are capable of enhancing locomotor recovery. Overall these data suggest that hCNS-SCns transplantation may have potential as an intervention for SCI beyond sub-acute time points, which is of significant clinical relevance for the SCI population.


We thank Rebecca Nishi, Hongli Liu, Eliza Scott, Amber Nefas, Abbie Schindler, Kameelah Abdullah, Jon Stellar, and Brian Ahn for technical assistance, and MaryAnn H. Hill for statistical analysis.


Competing Interests: Nobuko Uchida is a paid employee of StemCells, Inc. Aileen J. Anderson has served as a paid consultant to StemCells, Inc. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIH/NINDS) R43 NS046975, NIH/NINDS R01 NS049885, and CRF AAC-2005 to A.J. Anderson. D.L. Salazar was supported by CIRM stem cell training grant T1-00008 and UC AGEP fellowship NSF HRD0450366. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Okano H, Kaneko S, Okada S, Iwanami A, Nakamura M, et al. Regeneration-based therapies for spinal cord injuries. Neurochem Int. 2007;51:68–73. [PubMed]
2. Mothe AJ, Kulbatski I, Parr A, Mohareb M, Tator CH. Adult spinal cord stem/progenitor cells transplanted as neurospheres preferentially differentiate into oligodendrocytes in the adult rat spinal cord. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:735–751. [PubMed]
3. Houle JD, Tessler A. Repair of chronic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2003;182:247–260. [PubMed]
4. Cummings BJ, Hooshmand M, Salazar DL, Anderson AJ. Ribak CE, editor. Human neural stem cell-mediated repair of the contused spinal cord: Timing the microenvironment. From Development to Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System: Oxford University Press. 2008. pp. 297–322.
5. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:190–205. [PubMed]
6. Barakat DJ, Gaglani SM, Neravetla SR, Sanchez AR, Andrade CM, et al. Survival, integration, and axon growth support of glia transplanted into the chronically contused spinal cord. Cell Transplant. 2005;14:225–240. [PubMed]
7. Fraidakis MJ, Spenger C, Olson L. Partial recovery after treatment of chronic paraplegia in rat. Exp Neurol. 2004;188:33–42. [PubMed]
8. Lu J, Feron F, Mackay-Sim A, Waite PM. Olfactory ensheathing cells promote locomotor recovery after delayed transplantation into transected spinal cord. Brain. 2002;125:14–21. [PubMed]
9. Keyvan-Fouladi N, Raisman G, Li Y. Functional repair of the corticospinal tract by delayed transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells in adult rats. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9428–9434. [PubMed]
10. Zurita M, Vaquero J, Oya S, Montilla J. Functional recovery in chronic paraplegic rats after co-grafts of fetal brain and adult peripheral nerve tissue. Surg Neurol. 2001;55:249–254; discussion 254-245. [PubMed]
11. Coumans JV, Lin TT, Dai HN, MacArthur L, McAtee M, et al. Axonal regeneration and functional recovery after complete spinal cord transection in rats by delayed treatment with transplants and neurotrophins. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9334–9344. [PubMed]
12. Keirstead HS, Nistor G, Bernal G, Totoiu M, Cloutier F, et al. Human embryonic stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte progenitor cell transplants remyelinate and restore locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4694–4705. [PubMed]
13. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Eftekharpour E, Wang J, Morshead CM, Fehlings MG. Delayed transplantation of adult neural precursor cells promotes remyelination and functional neurological recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2006;26:3377–3389. [PubMed]
14. Luchetti S, Beck KD, Galvan MD, Silva R, Cummings BJ, et al. Comparison of immunopathology and locomotor recovery in C57BL/6, BUB/BnJ, and NOD-SCID mice after contusion spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:411–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Greiner DL, Hesselton RA, Shultz LD. SCID mouse models of human stem cell engraftment. Stem Cells. 1998;16:166–177. [PubMed]
16. Miura K, Okada Y, Aoi T, Okada A, Takahashi K, et al. Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:743–745. [PubMed]
17. Ogawa D, Okada Y, Nakamura M, Kanemura Y, Okano HJ, et al. Evaluation of human fetal neural stem/progenitor cells as a source for cell replacement therapy for neurological disorders: properties and tumorigenicity after long-term in vitro maintenance. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:307–317. [PubMed]
18. Uchida N, Buck DW, He D, Reitsma MJ, Masek M, et al. Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:14720–14725. [PubMed]
19. Cummings BJ, Uchida N, Tamaki SJ, Salazar DL, Hooshmand M, et al. Human neural stem cells differentiate and promote locomotor recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:14069–14074. [PubMed]
20. Cummings BJ, Uchida N, Tamaki SJ, Anderson AJ. Human neural stem cell differentiation following transplantation into spinal cord injured mice: association with recovery of locomotor function. Neurol Res. 2006;28:474–481. [PubMed]
21. Macias MY, Syring MB, Pizzi MA, Crowe MJ, Alexanian AR, et al. Pain with no gain: allodynia following neural stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2006;201:335–348. [PubMed]
22. Chow SY, Moul J, Tobias CA, Himes BT, Liu Y, et al. Characterization and intraspinal grafting of EGF/bFGF-dependent neurospheres derived from embryonic rat spinal cord. Brain Res. 2000;874:87–106. [PubMed]
23. Vroemen M, Aigner L, Winkler J, Weidner N. Adult neural progenitor cell grafts survive after acute spinal cord injury and integrate along axonal pathways. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18:743–751. [PubMed]
24. Pallini R, Vitiani LR, Bez A, Casalbore P, Facchiano F, et al. Homologous transplantation of neural stem cells to the injured spinal cord of mice. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:1014–1025; discussion 1014-1025. [PubMed]
25. Cao QL, Zhang YP, Howard RM, Walters WM, Tsoulfas P, et al. Pluripotent stem cells engrafted into the normal or lesioned adult rat spinal cord are restricted to a glial lineage. Exp Neurol. 2001;167:48–58. [PubMed]
26. Cao QL, Howard RM, Dennison JB, Whittemore SR. Differentiation of engrafted neuronal-restricted precursor cells is inhibited in the traumatically injured spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2002;177:349–359. [PubMed]
27. Ishii K, Nakamura M, Dai H, Finn TP, Okano H, et al. Neutralization of ciliary neurotrophic factor reduces astrocyte production from transplanted neural stem cells and promotes regeneration of corticospinal tract fibers in spinal cord injury. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1669–1681. [PubMed]
28. Galvan MD, Luchetti S, Burgos AM, Nguyen HX, Hooshmand MJ, et al. Deficiency in complement C1q improves histological and functional locomotor outcome after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2008;28:13876–13888. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Nishi RA, Liu H, Chu Y, Hamamura M, Su MY, et al. Behavioral, histological, and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging assessment of graded contusion spinal cord injury in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:674–689. [PubMed]
30. Hooshmand MJ, Sontag CJ, Uchida N, Tamaki S, Anderson AJ, et al. Analysis of host-mediated repair mechanisms after human CNS-stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury: correlation of engraftment with recovery. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5871. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Basso DM, Fisher LC, Anderson AJ, Jakeman LB, McTigue DM, et al. Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:635–659. [PubMed]
32. Engesser-Cesar C, Anderson AJ, Basso DM, Edgerton VR, Cotman CW. Voluntary wheel running improves recovery from a moderate spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:157–171. [PubMed]
33. Hamers FP, Lankhorst AJ, van Laar TJ, Veldhuis WB, Gispen WH. Automated quantitative gait analysis during overground locomotion in the rat: its application to spinal cord contusion and transection injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:187–201. [PubMed]
34. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 1994;53:55–63. [PubMed]
35. Engesser-Cesar C, Ichiyama RM, Nefas AL, Hill MA, Edgerton VR, et al. Wheel running following spinal cord injury improves locomotor recovery and stimulates serotonergic fiber growth. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:1931–1939. [PubMed]
36. Hofstetter CP, Holmstrom NA, Lilja JA, Schweinhardt P, Hao J, et al. Allodynia limits the usefulness of intraspinal neural stem cell grafts; directed differentiation improves outcome. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:346–353. [PubMed]
37. Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:146–156. [PubMed]
38. Davies SJ, Fitch MT, Memberg SP, Hall AK, Raisman G, et al. Regeneration of adult axons in white matter tracts of the central nervous system. Nature. 1997;390:680–683. [PubMed]
39. Fitch MT, Doller C, Combs CK, Landreth GE, Silver J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of glial scarring and progressive cavitation: in vivo and in vitro analysis of inflammation-induced secondary injury after CNS trauma. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8182–8198. [PubMed]
40. Fawcett JW. Overcoming inhibition in the damaged spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:371–383. [PubMed]
41. Fawcett JW, Asher RA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull. 1999;49:377–391. [PubMed]
42. Lasiene J, Shupe L, Perlmutter S, Horner P. No evidence for chronic demyelination in spared axons after spinal cord injury in a mouse. J Neurosci. 2008;28:3887–3896. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
43. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Eftekharpour E, Fehlings MG. Temporal and spatial patterns of Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 protein and gene expression in spinal cord white matter after acute and chronic spinal cord injury in rats: implications for axonal pathophysiology after neurotrauma. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:577–589. [PubMed]
44. Poliak S, Peles E. The local differentiation of myelinated axons at nodes of Ranvier. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:968–980. [PubMed]
45. Tobias CA, Shumsky JS, Shibata M, Tuszynski MH, Fischer I, et al. Delayed grafting of BDNF and NT-3 producing fibroblasts into the injured spinal cord stimulates sprouting, partially rescues axotomized red nucleus neurons from loss and atrophy, and provides limited regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2003;184:97–113. [PubMed]
46. Liu Y, Himes BT, Murray M, Tessler A, Fischer I. Grafts of BDNF-producing fibroblasts rescue axotomized rubrospinal neurons and prevent their atrophy. Exp Neurol. 2002;178:150–164. [PubMed]
47. Liu Y, Kim D, Himes BT, Chow SY, Schallert T, et al. Transplants of fibroblasts genetically modified to express BDNF promote regeneration of adult rat rubrospinal axons and recovery of forelimb function. J Neurosci. 1999;19:4370–4387. [PubMed]
48. Heine W, Conant K, Griffin JW, Hoke A. Transplanted neural stem cells promote axonal regeneration through chronically denervated peripheral nerves. Exp Neurol. 2004;189:231–240. [PubMed]
49. Hill CE, Proschel C, Noble M, Mayer-Proschel M, Gensel JC, et al. Acute transplantation of glial-restricted precursor cells into spinal cord contusion injuries: survival, differentiation, and effects on lesion environment and axonal regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2004;190:289–310. [PubMed]
50. Teng YD, Lavik EB, Qu X, Park KI, Ourednik J, et al. Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:3024–3029. [PubMed]
51. Tarasenko YI, Gao J, Nie L, Johnson KM, Grady JJ, et al. Human fetal neural stem cells grafted into contusion-injured rat spinal cords improve behavior. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:47–57. [PubMed]
52. Wu P, Ye Y, Svendsen CN. Transduction of human neural progenitor cells using recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Gene Ther. 2002;9:245–255. [PubMed]
53. Su H, Chu TH, Wu W. Lithium enhances proliferation and neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro and after transplantation into the adult rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol. 2007;206:296–307. [PubMed]
54. Parr AM, Kulbatski I, Tator CH. Transplantation of adult rat spinal cord stem/progenitor cells for spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:835–845. [PubMed]
55. Hofstetter CP, Schwarz EJ, Hess D, Widenfalk J, El Manira A, et al. Marrow stromal cells form guiding strands in the injured spinal cord and promote recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:2199–2204. [PubMed]
56. Marsala M, Kakinohana O, Yaksh TL, Tomori Z, Marsala S, et al. Spinal implantation of hNT neurons and neuronal precursors: graft survival and functional effects in rats with ischemic spastic paraplegia. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:2401–2414. [PubMed]
57. Boockvar JA, Schouten J, Royo N, Millard M, Spangler Z, et al. Experimental traumatic brain injury modulates the survival, migration, and terminal phenotype of transplanted epidermal growth factor receptor-activated neural stem cells. Neurosurgery. 2005;56:163–171; discussion 171. [PubMed]
58. Yan J, Xu L, Welsh AM, Hatfield G, Hazel T, et al. Extensive neuronal differentiation of human neural stem cell grafts in adult rat spinal cord. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e39. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
59. Prochazka M, Serreze DV, Frankel WN, Leiter EH. NOR/Lt mice: MHC-matched diabetes-resistant control strain for NOD mice. Diabetes. 1992;41:98–106. [PubMed]
60. Serreze DV, Leiter EH, Hanson MS, Christianson SW, Shultz LD, et al. Emv30null NOD-scid mice. An improved host for adoptive transfer of autoimmune diabetes and growth of human lymphohematopoietic cells. Diabetes. 1995;44:1392–1398. [PubMed]
61. Tan AM, Petruska JC, Mendell LM, Levine JM. Sensory afferents regenerated into dorsal columns after spinal cord injury remain in a chronic pathophysiological state. Exp Neurol. 2007;206:257–268. [PubMed]
62. Piao JH, Odeberg J, Samuelsson EB, Kjaeldgaard A, Falci S, et al. Cellular composition of long-term human spinal cord- and forebrain-derived neurosphere cultures. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:471–482. [PubMed]
63. Jakovcevski I, Zecevic N. Olig transcription factors are expressed in oligodendrocyte and neuronal cells in human fetal CNS. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10064–10073. [PubMed]
64. Tripathi R, McTigue DM. Prominent oligodendrocyte genesis along the border of spinal contusion lesions. Glia. 2007;55:698–711. [PubMed]
65. Beck KD, Nguyen HX, Galvan MD, Salazar DL, Woodruff TM, et al. Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment. Brain. 2010;133:433–447. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
66. Fleming JC, Norenberg MD, Ramsay DA, Dekaban GA, Marcillo AE, et al. The cellular inflammatory response in human spinal cords after injury. Brain. 2006;129:3249–3269. [PubMed]
67. Plant GW, Christensen CL, Oudega M, Bunge MB. Delayed transplantation of olfactory ensheathing glia promotes sparing/regeneration of supraspinal axons in the contused adult rat spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:1–16. [PubMed]
68. Bambakidis NC, Miller RH. Transplantation of oligodendrocyte precursors and sonic hedgehog results in improved function and white matter sparing in the spinal cords of adult rats after contusion. Spine J. 2004;4:16–26. [PubMed]
69. Blight AR. Effect of 4-aminopyridine on axonal conduction-block in chronic spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull. 1989;22:47–52. [PubMed]
70. Shi R, Blight AR. Differential effects of low and high concentrations of 4-aminopyridine on axonal conduction in normal and injured spinal cord. Neuroscience. 1997;77:553–562. [PubMed]
71. Shi R, Kelly TM, Blight AR. Conduction block in acute and chronic spinal cord injury: different dose-response characteristics for reversal by 4-aminopyridine. Exp Neurol. 1997;148:495–501. [PubMed]
72. Smith PM, Jeffery ND. Histological and ultrastructural analysis of white matter damage after naturally-occurring spinal cord injury. Brain Pathol. 2006;16:99–109. [PubMed]
73. Guest JD, Hiester ED, Bunge RP. Demyelination and Schwann cell responses adjacent to injury epicenter cavities following chronic human spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2005;192:384–393. [PubMed]
74. Kakulas BA. A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis on special features. J Spinal Cord Med. 1999;22:119–124. [PubMed]
75. Norenberg MD, Smith J, Marcillo A. The pathology of human spinal cord injury: defining the problems. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:429–440. [PubMed]
76. Blakemore WF. Olfactory glia and CNS repair: a step in the road from proof of principle to clinical application. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 8):1543–1544. [PubMed]
77. Lu P, Jones LL, Snyder EY, Tuszynski MH. Neural stem cells constitutively secrete neurotrophic factors and promote extensive host axonal growth after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2003;181:115–129. [PubMed]
78. Llado J, Haenggeli C, Maragakis NJ, Snyder EY, Rothstein JD. Neural stem cells protect against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity and promote survival of injured motor neurons through the secretion of neurotrophic factors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27:322–331. [PubMed]
79. Gao J, Prough DS, McAdoo DJ, Grady JJ, Parsley MO, et al. Transplantation of primed human fetal neural stem cells improves cognitive function in rats after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2006;201:281–292. [PubMed]
80. Okano H, Ogawa Y, Nakamura M, Kaneko S, Iwanami A, et al. Transplantation of neural stem cells into the spinal cord after injury. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2003;14:191–198. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science