PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Mt Sinai J Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 16.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2922037
NIHMSID: NIHMS223761

Current Treatment and Recent Clinical Research in Alzheimer's Disease

Judith Neugroschl, MD1 and Mary Sano, PhD1,2

Abstract

The transition from either epidemiological observation or the bench to rigorously tested clinical trials in patients with Alzheimer's disease is crucial in understanding which treatments are beneficial to patients. The amyloid hypothesis has undergone scrutiny recently, as many trials aimed at reducing amyloid and plaque have been completed or are in the testing phase. Examples include modulation of the secretases involved in beta amyloid formation, anti-aggregation agents, and immunotherapeutic trials. Other therapies targeting hyperphosphorylated tau and novel targets such as enhancement of mitochondrial function, serotonin receptors, receptor for advanced glycation end products, and nerve growth factor, as well as other strategies, are discussed. A brief review of the current Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments is included.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, amyloid, antioxidant, Dimebon, immunotherapy, receptor for advanced glycation end products, research, secretase, tau, treatment

Altering the course of Alzheimer's disease (AD) could lead to significant pubic health benefits. For example, an intervention that could delay the onset of AD by 2 years would decrease the incidence in such a way that in 50 years there would be nearly 2 million fewer cases than are currently projected.1 One can imagine that significantly altering the course of the disease would similarly sharply decrease the need for nursing home placement and could help patients remain functional for much longer. The costs associated with taking care of a patient with AD increase with disease severity,2 so that if patients could be maintained at an earlier stage, it would be beneficial for the patient, the family, and society. In general, the number of patients with AD is thought to be increasing from approximately 5.3 million in 2009 to 11 to 16 million by 2050.3

There are only 5 medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat AD. Four of them are acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and tacrine), and the fifth is the N -methyl-d-aspartate antagonist memantine. These medications ameliorate the symptoms and can improve the functioning of patients with AD, but they are not curative, nor do they significantly change the course of the illness. The most widely studied treatments aim to address the neuropathological findings over the last century and focus on acetylcholine, inflammatory markers, amyloid plaques, and tau-based neurofibrillary tangles. In this article, we discuss some of the drugs that target these and other novel mechanisms and the rationale for some of the most promising new agents, and we review recent findings, both positive and negative, in the treatment and prevention of AD.

There are only 5 medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat AD. These medications ameliorate the symptoms and can improve the functioning of patients with AD, but they are not curative, nor do they significantly change the course of the illness.

CURRENT FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION–APPROVED MEDICATIONS

Cholinesterase Inhibitors

Since before 1915, scopolamine, an anticholinergic agent, was used to induce amnesia in women during labor and delivery.4,5 In the 1970s, research explored the specific cognitive effects of acetylchoine,6 and trials of physostigmine were undertaken in cognitively normal individuals (eg, Davis et al.7). Later research was done with AD patients using intravenous and oral physostigmine (eg, Davis and Mohs8 and Mohs et al.9). In 1983, the first acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor was approved [tacrine (Cognex)]. It was hampered by 4 times per day dosing, reversible hepatocellular injury in up to 50% of patients, and very poor tolerability due to significant procholinergic side effects of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The other acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors, released between 1996 and 2001, have very similar efficacy, although they have slightly different mechanisms of action. For example, rivastigmine also inhibits butylcholinesterase, and galantamine is an allosteric modulator of the nicotinic receptor. These medications tend to effect a 6- to 18-month improvement in cognitive functioning followed by deterioration along a parallel path. Abrupt cessation of these medications tends to place patients back on their original curve.

Memantine

Memantine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist. It has been approved only for moderate to severe AD, and the Food and Drug Administration refused to extend its approval to mild AD in 2005. In theory, it may help prevent neuronal excitotoxicity. The clinical trials of moderate to severe AD showed a modest improvement in global measures of functioning, both with10 and without11 a cholinesterase inhibitor.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents

Overactivity of the immune system, causing damage to neuronal cells, has been postulated to be a mechanism of AD pathogenesis. Neuropathological studies have demonstrated that the brains of AD patients have increased concentrations of acute phase reactants, cytokines, and complement protein in comparison with age-matched controls.1215 Epidemiological studies exploring the risk of AD have suggested that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory or corticosteroid use lessens the risk of developing AD.16,17 A number of clinical trials have shown no benefit from a variety of anti-inflammatory agents ranging from selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to prednisone as treatments for AD,1821 and one recent study has suggested a possible deleterious cognitive effect.22 Primary and secondary prevention trials with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been similarly negative.2325 In addition, there are many side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, such as renal insufficiency and gastrointestinal bleeding, which should be noted.

Antioxidants

Oxidative stress has been implicated in cell damage and aging in general26 and in neurodegenerative diseases in particular.27 Thus, medications with antioxidant properties have been evaluated as treatments for AD. Many agents have been examined for their potential benefit in dementia and cognitive improvement on the basis of their antioxidant properties. The most common of these is vitamin E. In one study, vitamin E was found to delay clinical progression in AD patients from moderate impairment to severe impairment, although no cognitive benefit was found.28 Observational studies have reported that the use of high doses of vitamin E may slow progression of AD, and other clinical trials have been unable to demonstrate a benefit in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or in primary prevention populations.29,30 There remains considerable interest in vitamin E, and 2 important ongoing studies will be informative. One, sponsored by the Department of Veteran Affairs, is a 3-arm study examining vitamin E (100 IU twice daily), memantine, or placebo in a double-blind fashion in a 4-year study of over 800 subjects with mild AD. The primary outcome is a measure of activities of daily living. Another study, Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease by Vitamin E and Selenium (PREADVISE; Clinical-Trials.gov: NCT00040378), is an add-on to a trial to prevent prostate cancer with 35,533 participants, the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), which was halted in 2008 because in an interim analysis there were no significant differences between the groups in prostate cancer prevention, although there was an insignificantly increased risk of prostate cancer in the vitamin E group and an insignificantly increased risk of type 2 diabetes in the selenium-only group.31 The PREADVISE study continues to follow over 5000 individuals who had been taking vitamin E (400 IU) alone or in combination with 200 μg of selenium or placebo and will determine how exposure to these affected the risk of developing dementia. Although some safety concerns have been raised about the use of high-dose vitamin E in populations at risk for cardiovascular disease, there is no evidence of negative effects on cognition.

Cholesterol Lowering

Initially, epidemiological studies suggested a decreased risk of AD in patients taking 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins).32,33 Basic research supported the idea that statins may inhibit beta amyloid (Aβ) formation in vitro.34 The initial findings led to clinical research. In a single-site, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of 67 subjects with mild to moderate AD, atorvastatin was shown to have a beneficial effect on cognitive measures in comparison with placebo.35 When the researchers performed secondary analyses, they found that the benefit was more prominent for individuals with baseline elevated cholesterol levels and milder memory impairments.36 Simvastatin, which has reasonable central nervous system penetration, was also associated with a decrease in cerebrospinal fluid α- and β-cleaved soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPP) but not Aβ (42) after 12 weeks of 20 mg daily.37 When these preliminary data were subjected to a larger multicenter trial lasting for 18 months with 406 patients with AD, statins failed to show a benefit over placebo for simvastain.38 A more recent meta-analysis of epidemiological studies failed to support the beneficial effect of statins on AD risk.39 Large multicenter trials of statins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, looking at cognitive outcomes, have also shown a lack of a beneficial effect on cognition or incident dementia.40,41

Estrogen

Beginning in the 1930s, studies have examined the possible role of estrogen in cognition.42 In the 1990s, there was a great deal of interest in a number of population and case control studies looking at estrogen usage and the risk of AD. Many of these studies (eg, Paganini-Hill and Henderson,43 Tang et al.,44 and Kawas et al.45) suggested a decreased risk of AD with estrogen use, although others (eg, Barrett-Connor and Kritz-Silverstein,46 Barrett-Connor and Edelstein,47 and Brenner et al.48) did not. Basic science supported the idea that estrogen might be neuroprotective. Estrogen enhances neuronal growth and connectivity and has been shown to promote neuronal survival (eg, DeVoogd and Nottebohm49 and Matsumoto and Arai50), and it up-regulates nerve growth factor (NGF) messenger RNA and neuronal sensitivity to NGF.51 Early small open-label treatment studies suggested a positive effect of estrogen on cognition in AD. However, results from randomized clinical trials of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) in women already diagnosed with mild to moderate AD5254 have failed to demonstrate improvement of cognition or a slowed rate of cognitive decline. The duration of follow-up in these studies ranged from 4 to 12 months. There was some evidence of deleterious cognitive effects. The use of CEE to treat AD in postmenopausal women is therefore not recommended. The question of whether estrogen would prevent cognitive loss and AD has also been addressed in prospective trials. Surprisingly, the use of estrogen was associated with both increased cardiovascular risks and increased risk of dementia. For example, in women over 65 years, the use of estrogen or estrogen/progesterone actually increased the odds of converting to MCI or dementia.55,56 A recent randomized trial of CEE in 180 women, less than 1 year after menopause, who were 45 to 55 years old was designed to answer the question of whether the timing of estrogen exposure (ie, perimenopausal exposure) was important in reducing dementia risk. However, this study demonstrated a trend toward worsening cognition in the treated group.57 These results make it difficult to imagine any cognitive benefit from exogenous estrogen. Despite these results, the question of whether estrogen in another form may be useful is being considered in studies of raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator: in a secondary outcome analysis of an osteoporosis trial of 5386 postmenopausal women taking raloxifene or placebo, it was suggested that at 120 mg there was a lower relative risk of any cognitive impairment (relative risk = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.53–1.01).58 There is a current phase 2 trial (NCT00368459) underway in patients with AD, and it aims to enroll 72 patients at 2 sites.59 Raloxifene has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism.

Docosahexanoic Acid

Docosahexanoic acid (DHA) is an omega 3 polyun-saturated fatty acid found in fish and some marine algae. It is a component of synaptic plasma membranes and in animal studies has been shown to perform a number of roles in the brain, including affecting the rate of signal transduction, being neuroprotective, and regulating gene expression. Research has suggested that AD patients have lower plasma DHA levels. A clinical trial in Sweden that was published in 2006 found that in patients with very mild AD, omega 3 fatty acids slowed cognitive decline, as evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), over a 12-month period, although no effect was seen in patients with moderate stage disease.60 There have been 2 recent trials, one in AD and one in elderly adults with a memory complaint. The AD trial was an 18-month phase 3 trial looking at DHA and the progression of AD in 402 patients who had low dietary intake of DHA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00440050). The 2 outcome measures, a cognitive outcome [Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)] and a global one (Clinical Dementia Scale–Sum of the Boxes), as well as other behavioral outcome measures did not differ between the placebo and active groups, despite increased levels of DHA in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid. There was no difference between the mild and moderate AD patients, but those without the apolipoprotein E4 allele did have a statistically slower rate of decline with DHA.61 The other trial was a 6-month trial of DHA versus placebo in 485 elderly patients with a memory complaint. The primary outcome measure was a visuospatial episodic memory test. The active group made significantly fewer errors in comparison with their baseline scores.61 Another trial looking at high-dose and low-dose DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid in cognitively healthy older adults showed no cognitive benefit over the 26 weeks of the trial.62

Ginkgo Biloba

Ginkgo biloba, a Chinese herbal medicine used for its “healthful properties,” including effects on memory, was evaluated to see if it decreased the incidence of all-cause dementia in elderly patients.63 Three thousand individuals, approximately 16% of whom met criteria for MCI at the start of the trial, were followed for a median of 6 years on placebo or ginkgo. Over the duration of the trial, they were evaluated for incident dementia every 6 months. The rates of dementia in general, of AD in particular, and of conversion to dementia from MCI were not statistically different in the 2 groups. They did not report data on specific cognitive measures for individuals in the 2 groups. There was no improvement on any secondary outcomes such as overall morbidity. As pointed out in an editorial concerning this trial, potentially serious side effects of gingko, such as increased bleeding risk, need to be considered in light of the fact that there is no convincing evidence that it has any beneficial effects on cognition or dementia incidence in humans in the forms in which it has been used.64 A 1-year randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 309 AD patients looking at ginkgo biloba as a treatment for AD showed modest improvement on some measures,65 although 2 later 6-month trials of 21466 and 51367 patients showed no benefit. Overall, the research on ginkgo is at best “inconsistent and unconvincing.”68

Homocysteine/B Vitamins

The Framingham study and others have noted that elevations in plasma homocysteine are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease69,70 and cerebrovascular disease71 as well as AD.72 For example, a study of 1092 subjects observed that elevated homocysteine was an independent risk factor for AD, and levels over 14 μmol/L almost doubled an individual's risk of developing AD.72 Theories about how homocysteine might act as a risk factor for AD range from potentiating Aβ production or toxicity to vascular-related effects. To see if lowering homocysteine in patients with AD would change the course of the illness, an 18-month prospective trial in 400 mild to moderate AD patients evaluated the effect of lowering homocysteine. The intervention (folate and vitamins B6 and B12) was quite successful at lowering homocysteine, but it did not slow cognitive decline, and there was no difference between the active and placebo groups in the rate of change of a cognitive measure (ADAS-Cog).73 This was confirmed in another study that also looked at plasma Aβ levels in 300 patients with strokes; again, despite lowering homocysteine, it did not affect the Aβ levels or cognition.74

Xaliproden (SR57746A)

Xaliproden is a compound with has neurotrophic effects in virto. It also antagonizes the 5HT1A receptor75 which may facilitate glutamatergic and cholinergic neurotransmission.76 Unfortunately, the results of 2 large 18-month clinical trials of xaliproden (over 1000 patients in each trial) as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for mild to moderate AD yielded disappointing results, and the company is not developing the drug further for these indications.77

AGENTS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION

In this section, we discuss avenues currently under investigation, and we group them either by the mechanism if the mechanism is clear or by the agent itself.

Interventions Targeting Amyloid

Amyloid: A Short Review

The only known genetic forms of AD are caused by mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) or the enzymes that are involved in Aβ formation. APP is coded on chromosome 21. Individuals with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) are noted to universally have the neuropathological hallmarks of AD as they age. APP is cleaved either by α-secretase into a soluble fragment (sAPP) or by β secretase [also called β-site amyloid precursor protein–cleaving enzyme (BACE)] and then by γ-secretase, and this results in fragments that are 37 to 42 amino acids in length. The 42–amino acid fragment is most associated with AD pathology. The only known autosomal dominant forms of AD are due to mutations in either APP or regions that code for proteins involved in the secretases, and they are all associated with elevations in Aβ. Because of this genetic evidence, many scientists postulate that the accumulation of Aβ is the inciting factor in the development of AD. The Aβ fragments can either oligomerize to form soluble toxins or else fibrillize to form plaques. Aβ oligomers may play an important role in AD pathogenesis, as they have been found to be highly toxic to neurons by initiating a cascade of events that contribute to activation of microglia, synaptic degeneration, oxidative injury, and apoptosis. Interventions aimed at reducing amyloid plaque burden by either altering amyloid metabolism through enzyme mediation or maximizing clearance, particularly through immunotherapy, are under study (reviewed by Barten and Albright78).

The only known genetic forms of AD are caused by mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) or the enzymes that are involved in amyloid beta (Aβ) formation.

Modulating the Formation of Aβ

If the overproduction or accumulation of Aβ is in fact the crucial event in the cascade that leads to AD, then decreasing its production by the inhibition of BACE or γ-secretase or the enhancement of α-secretase should decrease the pathology and change the course of the illness. Research has been done to identify and modulate the secretases. The greatest concern about inhibiting secretases, which have been highlighted in animal models and early trials, is the other potentially important proteins that they may be involved in processing. Thus, toxicities must be carefully monitored with these agents.

There are a number of BACE inhibitors that have been described in animal models but have not yet arrived in human trials. A number of approaches, including the creation of novel antibodies to target the BACE cleavage site of APP, have been taken.

The research into the γ-secretases has progressed farther, with 1 medication in phase 3 clinical trials. One concern about the γ-secretases is that they are involved in the cleavage of the Notch transmembrane receptors. In animal models, chronic inhibition is associated with effects in the gastrointestinal system, thymus, and spleen.

If the overproduction or accumulation of Aβ is in fact the crucial event in the cascade that leads to AD, then decreasing its production by the inhibition of β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme or γ-secretase or the enhancement of α-secretase should decrease the pathology and change the course of the illness.

The agent in phase 3 trials is LY450139 from Eli Lilly. The phase 2 study79 of 70 AD patients, lasting 6 weeks, demonstrated relative tolerability and decreased plasma levels of Aβ. Two phase 3 trials that are currently recruiting are looking at different doses in comparison with placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00762411 and NCT0059456). Other γ-secretase inhibitors in clinical trials include one from Bristol-Myers Squib (BMS-708 163), which is relatively Notchsparing according to preclinical testing. There are 2 ongoing clinical trials with this agent (Clinical-Trials.gov: NCT00810147 for patients with mild to moderate AD and NCT00890890 for those with prodromal AD). In addition, Wyeth is testing GSI136 in a phase 1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00718731).

Other agents serendipitously have been found to be secretase inhibitors. For example, tarenflurbil, an anti-inflammatory agent, was found to modulate γ-secretase activity. Basic research suggested cognitive benefit in animal studies. The year-long phase 2 trial of 210 patients with mild to moderate AD demonstrated tolerability, but it did not show a beneficial effect on function or cognition. In a post hoc analysis, some benefit was seen at the highest dose in the patients with the mildest disease80 An 18-month phase 3 trial with 1649 patients showed no benefit from treatment, and the company (Myriad) discontinued the investigation of the agent.81 It has been postulated that the oral administration of the medication may not have allowed for adequate γ-secretase inhibition to affect disease.82

Blocking the Aggregation of Beta Amyloid into Oligomers or Amyloid Plaque

The amyloid hypothesis posits that aggregated Aβ is particularly toxic to cells, and thus blocking aggregation and ultimately preventing plaque from forming could change the course of the illness. The most interesting agent in trials is scyllo-inositol, which is currently in phase 2 clinical studies sponsored by Elan Pharmaceuticals (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0056 8776). This agent seems to be directed at the Aβ oligomers: it binds them and prevents synaptic damage. Scyllo-inositol is a small molecule that readily crosses the blood-brain barrier by active transport. A recent negative trial of anti-aggregation agents was 3APS [tramiprosate or homotaurine (Alzhemed from Neurochem)]. The phase 3 trial in the United States was inconclusive; it failed to demonstrate efficacy on the cognitive endpoints in the 18-month trial of 1052 patients. The company then halted the European phase 3 trial before the data were released, and the results of the 2 trials have not been published except in a non–peer-reviewed article on the columetric magnetic resonance imaging results, which suggested less hippocampal shrinkage.83 Citing the magnetic resonance imaging findings, the company has decided to promote this medication as an over-the-counter medication, Vivimind, which is being put forward as protecting against memory loss.84

The amyloid hypothesis posits that aggregated Aβ is particularly toxic to cells, and thus blocking aggregation and ultimately preventing plaque from forming could change the course of the illness.

The phase 3 trial in the United States was inconclusive; it failed to demonstrate efficacy on the cognitive endpoints in the 18-month trial of 1052 patients.

Increasing Clearance of Beta Amyloid with Immunotherapy

Specific antibodies can bind Aβ and promote its clearance from the central nervous system. This can be accomplished either by the introduction of Aβ as an antigen so that the body can produce antibodies to it (active immunotherapy) or by the use of preformed antibodies (passive immunotherapy.) In 2002, the first phase 2 active immunity trial (AN-1792) was halted because of meningoencephalitis in 6% of the patients who received the vaccine (Clinical-Trials.gov: NCT00021723). This trial of 372 patients used an aggregated amyloid peptide with an adjuvant (QS-21) to boost the immune response. Researchers postulated that T cell–mediated immunity caused this adverse reaction, and thus the second-generation agents currently in trials use an N-terminal fragment of Aβ as an antigen because it is thought that this will generate more B cell–mediated, humoral immunity. The T cell–stimulating epitopes are more distal. Despite the halting of the trial, the researchers did follow the patients who received the vaccine. It is interesting to note that less than 20% of those who received the active vaccine achieved the targeted immune response level.85 In those that did, there was a marked effect on amyloid in the brain, although the other neuropathological hallmarks of AD were unchanged in comparison with controls, with prominent tangles, neuropil threads, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy.86 Unfortunately, there was little evidence of significant cognitive benefit as measured by both the ADAS-Cog and MMSE. However, with a composite statistical measure on the Neuropsychological Test Battery, there was some suggestion of benefit. With respect to functional measures, the patients who mounted the antibody response and the placebo controls declined at similar rates. There was some suggestion of improvement on a quality-of-life measure in the active group.85

Given the significant changes in plaque burden seen on autopsy, there was speculation about why there was little cognitive and functional change seen in the patients who mounted an antibody response. First, it is possible that removing Aβ after AD has already progressed is not useful; rather, it must not be allowed to accumulate in the first place. A second possibility is that Aβ is not the central player that it is thought to be, and other targets might be more fruitful. Third, the small number of patients who responded to the vaccine may limit the trial's generalizability. Had the patients responded to the vaccine safely and had the full set of booster injections been used, it is possible that more significant differences would have emerged in the active and placebo groups. Second-generation antigens are currently in phase 2 trials [eg, CAD106 (Novartis; Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00795418) and PF-04 360 365 (Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00945672)].

The approach of using preformed antibodies is also being studied (passive immunization). Passive immunity does not depend on the patient mounting an adequate immune response, and antibodies are cleared within hours of an infusion.87 Pooled human antibodies (eg, intravenous immunoglobulin, which is purified human immunoglobulin G) have been shown to contain antibodies to Aβ and possibly to Aβ oligomers as well. Recently, a small open-label study was published that followed 8 patients throughout 18 months of treatment.88 The primary outcome measure was the MMSE. Six of the 8 patients had their scores stabilize or improve at the 18-month mark. Currently, a phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00818662) is underway with a targeted enrollment of 360 patients, and it is trying to determine if intravenous immunoglobulin significantly slows the rate of decline in patients with mild to moderate AD. The primary outcomes are the ADAS-Cog and the Clinical Global Impression of Change scores at 9 months, with a planned secondary analysis at 18 months.

It is also possible to use preformed monoclonal antibodies to Aβ. There are currently 4 phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab, 2 with apolipoprotein E4 carriers and 2 without them. Their target enrollment is over 1000 patients. The results of the 18-month phase 2 trial of 240 patients with AD did not show efficacy on the cognitive measures, but a post hoc analysis looking at patients who did not carry the apolipoprotein E4 allele showed statistically significant benefits on ADAS-Cog and the Neuropsychological Test Battery.87,89 Of note, the higher doses of the antibodies were associated with vasogenic edema, and thus the current phase 3 trial does not include the highest dosage of bapineuzumab used in phase 2.90 It is important to note that cerebral microhemorrhages have also been described even with passive immunotherapy.91

Advanced Glycation End Products

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are formed endogenously during glycation and can also be ingested in a variety of foods.92 These AGEs have been implicated in aging through a variety of mechanisms, including increased protein crosslinking and increased free radical formation, and as proinflammatory mediators. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is an immunoglobulin super-gene family expressed on the cell surface of multiple cell types throughout the brain and on the blood-brain barrier. In AD, RAGE is up-regulated on cells in the hippocampus, such as astrocytes and microglia.93 Amyloid is known to bind to these receptors. This may be one way in which the inflammatory cascade is stimulated and thus may lead to cell death (reviewed by Chen et al.94). Preclinical studies have suggested that blocking this receptor against amyloid binding protects the cell by decreasing plaque formation and inflammation, and it may have an effect on memory functioning (reviewed by Chen et al.94). Pfizer and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study are working together on a phase 2 trial of PF-04 494 700, an oral RAGE antagonist. Recently, this dose-finding study has discontinued the highest dose because of evidence of increased behavioral disturbance and worsening cognition (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00566397).

Latrepirdine (Dimebon)

After the introduction of memantine, other N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonists were sought to expand the field of medications in this class. During one such screen, latrepirdine, once used as a nonselective antihistamine in Russia, was identified. Latrepirdine was studied in animal models of AD95 and was found to be beneficial in an avoidance conditioning paradigm. The mechanism of action of latrepirdine is unclear because it may also modulate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and weakly inhibit acheylcholinesterase.96,97 It also may act by enhancing mitochondrial function.98 Most recently, in a published trial,99 183 patients with mild to moderate AD (an MMSE score of 10–24) were given latrepirdine or placebo. At 26 weeks, the active group had improved performance on the primary cognitive outcome measure, the ADAS-Cog, as well as some secondary outcomes (including behavior, activities of daily living, and global function). In an up to 52-week blinded extension, the latrepirdine group continued to outperform on the ADAS-Cog, and the difference from placebo on the global and activities of daily living measures widened. The most common side effects were dry mouth and depressed mood, each occurring in 14% of the treated group versus 1% to 5% of the placebo group. Other adverse events [hyperhidrosis, insomnia, angina pectoris, asthenia, hyperkalemia, motor dysfunction (repetitive activity), polyuria, atrial flutter, raised blood bilirubin, dyspnea, and musculoskeletal pain] occurred at least twice as frequently in patients given Dimebon in week 26 or 52, but overall frequencies were quite low. Latrepirdine is currently in phase 3 trials in the United States.

Nerve Growth Factor

The loss of acetylcholine neurons is thought to be a significant cause of the memory loss of AD. NGF is a trophic factor for acetylcholine neurons. In a mouse model of Down syndrome, it was seen that increased APP reduced retrograde transport of NGF, and this led to the loss of cholinergic neurons.100 It is postulated that this may be a mechanism of cholinergic cell loss in AD. NGF has been shown to prevent the death of cholinergic neurons in rats in both aged and lesion models.101,102 When NGF was implanted in aging rhesus monkeys, it was demonstrated to reverse the loss of cholinergic neurons.103 In the earliest human trial, NGF was infused into the brain ventricular system of 3 patients, but it caused severe side effects, such as pain from stimulation of dorsal root ganglion nociceptive neurons, Schwann cell migration to the spinal cord, and weight loss.104 In a search for a more effective way to target NGF at appropriate areas, autologous fibroblasts were genetically modified to express human NGF and then implanted in 8 individuals with AD. There were 2 serious adverse events: the first 2 patients treated, who were sedated but were not under general anesthesia, had intraparenchymal bleeds from sudden movement. The rest of the patients were treated under general anesthesia. In this cohort, there were some statistically significant increases in cerebral metabolism on positron emission tomography scans of several cortical regions at 6 months in 4 participants as opposed to an expected decline with disease progression.105 More recently, a phase 1 clinical trial looked at NGF in an adenovirus vector. Ten participants at Rush Medical Center and at the University of California, San Diego, were included in an open-label trial looking at various doses of NGF. The researchers continue to follow these patients.106 Again, there are what appear to be encouraging positron emission tomography findings in 4 patients (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00087789). Given the overall tolerability of the neurosurgical procedure under general anesthesia in the phase 1 trial, there is currently a phase 2 clinical trial (Clinical-Trials.gov: NCT00876863) using the highest dose of NGF from the phase 1 trial. The researchers are hoping to enroll 50 subjects to participate in a placebo surgery controlled trial that will look at functional, cognitive, and imaging outcomes over a 2-year period with optional extended follow-up.

Resveratrol

There has been much written about resveratrol, the component found in the skin of red grapes that, in animal studies, has a variety of anti-aging effects, including extending the lifespan of yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans.107,108 In mice, it seemed to improve a variety of aging outcomes (bone health, cholesterol, and coordination), but it did not increase longevity.109 In an Alzheimer's model of transgenic mice, both red wine110 and resveratrol111 significantly reduced plaque formation. Resveratrol is currently being studied in a trial at Mount Sinai with an estimated enrollment of 60 individuals (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00678431).

Targeting Tau

Hyperphosphorylated tau protein is the main component of the other neuropathological hallmark of AD, the neurofibrillary tangle. Some scientists argue that the development of neurofibrillary tangles is the earliest neuropathological change in AD and is correlated with disease severity.112,113 The density of neurofibrillary tangles, particularly in the entorhinal cortex, has been argued to be important in establishing a diagnosis of AD.114 Mechanistically, hyperphosphorylated tau is also known to interfere with microtubule assembly, which may promote neuronal network breakdown.115

Various avenues have been studied in animal models to address tau. One is inhibiting tau kinases,116 and others involve supporting microtubule assembly.117,118 Another avenue that has currently passed a phase 2 trial is blocking tau aggregation with methylene blue (MTC).119 MTC may also enhance mitochondrial function.120 A 24-week phase 2 trial of 321 patients with mild to moderate AD was blindly continued for up to 84 weeks. At 24 weeks, the patients on active treatment had not declined statistically from the baseline on a standard cognitive measure (the ADAS-Cog). At 50 weeks, there was an 81% reduction in the rate of decline with respect to controls, and the effect size had increased from 24 weeks. Of note, the high test dose was deemed ineffective because of crosslinking to the capsule, and the investigators decided to combine this arm with the placebo arm for statistical purposes. Another significant issue is maintenance of the blinding in this trial because MTC is known to cause the sclera and urine to turn blue.121 A larger phase 3 trial is planned.

Serotonin Receptors

The discovery of the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 (5-HT4) receptor in the past 5 years has provided insights into the signaling pathways and the physiological roles of G protein–coupled receptors in neurons.55 Animal research has demonstrated the involvement of 5-HT4 receptors in cognitive processes, the protection of neurons via increased secretion of the soluble form of APP, and some evidence of cholinergic stimulation, and all of these are potentially therapeutic in AD.56 Recent 2-week clinical trials in humans suggest that agonists at the 5-HT4 receptor (eg, PRX-03 140) may have a cognitive enhancing effect.57 This agent was being developed by Epix and was in a phase 2 clinical trial, but after slow enrollment and insufficient financing, the company discontinued this development and left this as an unexplored avenue. Other serotonin receptors have been or are also being explored, such as 5-HT1A (previously described xaliproden) and 5-hydroxytryptamine-6 (SB-742 457), which just underwent a phase 1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00551772).

CONCLUSION

This review highlights some of the approaches and directions of research in AD over the past 2 decades. Numerous pathways have been identified to be targeted for potential interventions. There have been leads from serendipitous clinical findings, from observational studies, and from the basic science efforts at the bench. Regardless of origin, rigorous clinical trials are needed to definitively prove the efficacy of any potential treatment and, importantly, to understand the true risks. In fact, this review summarizes important trials that have been successful, in that they have provided valuable information on potential treatments. Several studies with hopeful agents yielded disappointing results. For example, clinical trials with estrogen, B vitamins, and anti-inflammatory agents identified not only a lack of efficacy but also increased risk for other conditions. Thus, these studies were critically informative and provided directions for avoiding these ineffective treatments.

Over the past 20 years, we have seen the first Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments, which have been shown to have efficacy across the span of the disease, and although the effects are modest, they are consistent and replicable. The ability to answer questions about potential treatments in the next decades will require even more extensive clinical research. Specific requirements for maximizing the efficient development of preventative agents must include the identification of true surrogate markers. The markers must not only provide predictable measures of risk but also be sensitive to interventions that shift risk. Such work cannot be done without large multisite efforts with a commitment to participation in activities such as biomarker databases,122 longitudinal clinical data registries, and networks of committed subjects and practitioners who are prepared to participate in cutting-edge research. Facilitating drug discovery in AD requires building methods and infrastructure to rapidly conduct large, definitive trials.123

The recruitment of subjects to randomized clinical trials remains the great challenge and is considered the major bottleneck to drug development. It is estimated that up to 95% of the delays in study completion are attributable to difficulty in recruiting patients.124 Table 1 reviews the time and number of sites needed for some of the recent AD trials. Like the experience in cancer trials so recently articulated in the lay press,125 the regulatory processes and the protection of human subjects require resources, skill, and effort. Clinicians must not be daunted by these requirements and need to accept the challenge of educating patients about the importance of rigorously conducted research. Understanding the value of placebo control trials and the collection of important safety and efficacy information as well as sharing this knowledge with patients is a valuable contribution, particularly when this information can be delivered by trusted practitioners. Patients are eager for the assessment of practitioners about the value of research trials, and many have the altruism to make this contribution to research. A recent report from the Alzheimer's Association126 indicates that although nearly 40% of patients ask their doctor about research, only 22% of doctors raise the issue with patients and only 21% know of research in their area. This illustrates the significant opportunity that primary care providers have to contribute to the research effort. Table 2 lists the trials currently ongoing at Mount Sinai, and Table 3 provides a list of resources for identifying research in AD both regionally and nationally. Sharing these resources can be one of the most hopeful actions that a clinician can perform for patients.

Table 1
Clinical Trials: Duration of recruitment and number of sites.
Table 2
Current Medication Trials at Mount Sinai.
Table 3
Resources to Find Clinical Trials.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by grant AG005138.

Footnotes

DISCLOSURES

Potential conflict of interest: Mary Sano has consulted for the following companies: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medivation, Genentech, Pfizer, and Elan.

REFERENCES

1. Brookmeyer R, Gray S, Kawas C. Projections of Alzheimer's disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1337–1342. [PubMed]
2. Zhu CW, Scarmeas N, Torgan R, et al. Longitudinal study of effects of patient characteristics on direct costs in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2006;67:998–1005. [PubMed]
3. Alzheimer's Association Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;2009;5:234–270. [PubMed]
4. Deutsch JA, Rocklin KW. Amnesia induced by scopolamine and its temporal variations. Nature. 1967;216:89–90. [PubMed]
5. Fist HS. An evaluation of obstetrical analgesia. Calif Med. 1954;80:91–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Drachman DA. Memory and cognitive function in man: does the cholinergic system have a specific role? Neurology. 1977;27:783–790. [PubMed]
7. Davis KL, Hollister LE, Overall J, et al. Physostigmine: effects on cognition and effect in normal subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976;51:23–27. [PubMed]
8. Davis KL, Mohs RC. Enhancement of memory processes in Alzheimer's disease with multiple-dose intravenous physostigmine. Am J Psychiatry. 1982;139:1421–1424. [PubMed]
9. Mohs RC, Davis BM, Johns CA, et al. Oral physostigmine treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:28–33. [PubMed]
10. Tariot PN, Farlow MR, Grossberg GT, et al. Memantine treatment in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease already receiving donepezil: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:317–324. [PubMed]
11. Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, et al. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1333–1341. [PubMed]
12. Bauer J, Ganter U, Strauss S, et al. The participation of interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Res Immunol. 1992;143:650–657. [PubMed]
13. Fillit H, Ding WH, Buee L, et al. Elevated circulating tumor necrosis factor levels in Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 1991;129:318–320. [PubMed]
14. Griffin WS, Stanley LC, Ling C, et al. Brain interleukin 1 and S-100 immunoreactivity are elevated in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:7611–7615. [PubMed]
15. Matsubara E, Hirai S, Amari M, et al. Alpha 1-antichymotrypsin as a possible biochemical marker for Alzheimer's-type dementia. Ann Neurol. 1990;28:561–567. [PubMed]
16. McGeer PL, McGeer E, Rogers J, Sibley J. Anti-inflammatory drugs and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 1990;335:1037. [PubMed]
17. Hayden KM, Zandi PP, Khachaturian AS, et al. Does NSAID use modify cognitive trajectories in the elderly? The Cache County study. Neurology. 2007;69:275–282. [PubMed]
18. Aisen PS, Davis KL, Berg JD, et al. A randomized controlled trial of prednisone in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Neurology. 2000;54:588–593. [PubMed]
19. Van Gool WA, Weinstein HC, Scheltens P, Walstra GJ. Effect of hydroxychloroquine on progression of dementia in early Alzheimer's disease: an 18-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2001;358:455–460. [PubMed]
20. Aisen PS, Schafer KA, Grundman M, et al. Effects of rofecoxib or naproxen vs placebo on Alzheimer's disease progression: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2819–2826. [PubMed]
21. Reines SA, Block GA, Morris JC, et al. Rofecoxib: no effect on Alzheimer's disease in a 1-year, randomized, blinded, controlled study. Neurology. 2004;62:66–71. [PubMed]
22. Breitner JC, Haneuse SJ, Walker R, et al. Risk of dementia and AD with prior exposure to NSAIDs in an elderly community-based cohort. Neurology. 2009;72:1899–1905. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Thal LJ, Ferris SH, Kirby L, et al. A randomized, double-blind study of rofecoxib in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1204–1215. [PubMed]
24. Group AR, Lyketsos CG, Breitner JC, et al. Naproxen and celecoxib do not prevent AD in early results from a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007;68:1800–1808. [PubMed]
25. Meinert CL, McCaffrey LD, Breitner JC. Alzheimer's Disease Anti-Inflammatory Prevention Trial: design, methods, and baseline results. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:93–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Chakravarti B, Chakravarti DN. Oxidative modification of proteins: age-related changes. Gerontology. 2007;53:128–139. [PubMed]
27. Nunomura A, Moreira PI, Lee HG, et al. Neuronal death and survival under oxidative stress in Alzheimer's and Parkinson diseases. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2007;6:411–423. [PubMed]
28. Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas RG, et al. A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol, or both as treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1216–1222. [PubMed]
29. Petersen RC, Thomas RG, Grundman M, et al. Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2379–2388. [PubMed]
30. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group MRC/BHF heart protection study of antioxidant vitamin supplementation in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:23–33. [PubMed]
31. Lippman SM, Klein EA, Goodman PJ, et al. Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). JAMA. 2009;301:39–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Wolozin B, Kellman W, Ruosseau P, et al. Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer's disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1439–1443. [PubMed]
33. Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, et al. Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet. 2000;356:1627–1631. [PubMed]
34. Fassbender K, Simons M, Bergmann C, et al. Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid peptides Abeta 42 and Abeta 40 in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:5856–5861. [PubMed]
35. Sparks DL, Sabbagh MN, Connor DJ, et al. Atorvastatin for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: preliminary results. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:753–757. [PubMed]
36. Sparks DL, Connor DJ, Sabbagh MN, et al. Circulating cholesterol levels, apolipoprotein E genotype and dementia severity influence the benefit of atorvastatin treatment in Alzheimer's disease: results of the Alzheimer's Disease Cholesterol-Lowering Treatment (ADCLT) trial. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2006;185:3–7. [PubMed]
37. Sjogren M, Gustafsson K, Syversen S, et al. Treatment with simvastatin in patients with Alzheimer's disease lowers both alpha- and beta-cleaved amyloid precursor protein. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2003;16:25–30. [PubMed]
38. Sano M. Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of simvastatin to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4(Suppl 4):T200.
39. Zhou B, Teramukai S, Fukushima M. Prevention and treatment of dementia or Alzheimer's disease by statins: a meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;23:194–201. [PubMed]
40. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:7–22. [PubMed]
41. Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1623–1630. [PubMed]
42. Anonymous Council of the Medical Women's Foundation An investigation of menopause in one thousand women. Lancet. 1933;1:106–108.
43. Paganini-Hill A, Henderson VW. Estrogen replacement therapy and risk of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2213–2217. [PubMed]
44. Tang MX, Jacobs D, Stern Y, et al. Effect of oestrogen during menopause on risk and age at onset of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 1996;348:429–432. [PubMed]
45. Kawas C, Resnick S, Morrison A, et al. A prospective study of estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neurology. 1997;48:1517–1521. [PubMed]
46. Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D. Estrogen replacement therapy and cognitive function in older women. JAMA. 1993;269:2637–2641. [PubMed]
47. Barrett-Connor E, Edelstein S. A prospective study of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and cognitive function in an older population: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:420–423. [PubMed]
48. Brenner DE, Kukull WA, Stergachis A, et al. Post-menopausal estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a population-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:262–267. [PubMed]
49. DeVoogd T, Nottebohm F. Gonadal hormones induce dendritic growth in the adult avian brain. Science. 1981;214:202–204. [PubMed]
50. Matsumoto A, Arai Y. Neuronal plasticity in the deafferented hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of adult female rats and its enhancement by treatment with estrogen. J Comp Neurol. 1981;197:197–205. [PubMed]
51. Sohrabji F, Miranda RC, Toran-Allerand CD. Estrogen differentially regulates estrogen and nerve growth factor receptor mRNAs in adult sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 1994;14:459–471. [PubMed]
52. Henderson VW, Paganini-Hill A, Miller BL, et al. Estrogen for Alzheimer's disease in women: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2000;54:295–301. [PubMed]
53. Mulnard RA, Cotman CW, Kawas C, et al. Estrogen replacement therapy for treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. JAMA. 2000;283:1007–1015. [PubMed]
54. Wang PN, Liao SQ, Liu RS, et al. Effects of estrogen on cognition, mood, and cerebral blood flow in AD: a controlled study. Neurology. 2000;54:2061–2066. [PubMed]
55. Shumaker SA, Legault C, Kuller L, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and incidence of probable dementia and mild cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative Memory Study. JAMA. 2004;291:2947–2958. [PubMed]
56. Craig MC, Maki PM, Murphy DG. The Women's Health Initiative Memory Study: findings and implications for treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:190–194. [PubMed]
57. Maki PM, Gast MJ, Vieweg AJ, et al. Hormone therapy in menopausal women with cognitive complaints: a randomized, double-blind trial. Neurology. 2007;69:1322–1330. [PubMed]
58. Yaffe K, Krueger K, Cummings SR, et al. Effect of raloxifene on prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment in older women: the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) randomized trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:683–690. [PubMed]
59. Raloxifene for women with Alzheimer's disease. [November 2009]. Available at: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00368459.
60. Freund-Levi Y, Eriksdotter-Jonhagen M, Cederholm T, et al. Omega-3 fatty acid treatment in 174 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: OmegAD study: a randomized double-blind trial. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1402–1408. [PubMed]
61. Results from trials of DHA in Alzheimer's disease and age-related cognitive decline. [November 2009]. Available at: http://www.alz.org/icad/2010_release_071209_1am_b.asp.
62. van de Rest O, Geleijnse JM, Kok FJ, et al. Effect of fish oil on cognitive performance in older subjects: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurology. 2008;71:430–438. [PubMed]
63. DeKosky ST, Williamson JD, Fitzpatrick AL, et al. Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;300:2253–2262. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
64. Schneider LS. Ginkgo biloba extract and preventing Alzheimer's disease. JAMA. 2008;300:2306–2308. [PubMed]
65. Le Bars PL, Katz MM, Berman N, et al. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of an extract of Ginkgo biloba for dementia. North American EGb Study Group. JAMA. 1997;278:1327–1332. [PubMed]
66. van Dongen MC, van Rossum E, Kessels AG, et al. The efficacy of ginkgo for elderly people with dementia and age-associated memory impairment: new results of a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1183–1194. [PubMed]
67. Schneider LS, DeKosky ST, Farlow MR, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of two doses of Ginkgo biloba extract in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2005;2:541–551. [PubMed]
68. Birks J, Grimley Evans J. Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD003120. [PubMed]
69. Stampfer MJ, Malinow MR, Willett WC, et al. A prospective study of plasma homocyst(e)ine and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians. JAMA. 1992;268:877–881. [PubMed]
70. Bostom AG, Silbershatz H, Rosenberg IH, et al. Non-fasting plasma total homocysteine levels and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in elderly Framingham men and women. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1077–1080. [PubMed]
71. Bostom AG, Rosenberg IH, Silbershatz H, et al. Non-fasting plasma total homocysteine levels and stroke incidence in elderly persons: the Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:352–355. [PubMed]
72. Seshadri S, Beiser A, Selhub J, et al. Plasma homo-cysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:476–483. [PubMed]
73. Aisen PS, Schneider LS, Sano M, et al. High-dose B vitamin supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;300:1774–1783. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Viswanathan A, Raj S, Greenberg SM, et al. Plasma Abeta, homocysteine, and cognition: the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) trial. Neurology. 2009;72:268–272. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
75. National Horizon Scanning Centre Xaliproden (Xalprila) for Alzheimer's disease. [November 2009]. Available at: www.haps.bham.ac.uk/publichealth/horizon/outputs/documents/2007/april/Xaliproden.pdf.
76. Schechter LE, Smith DL, Rosenzweig-Lipson S, et al. Lecozotan (SRA-333): a selective serotonin 1A receptor antagonist that enhances the stimulated release of glutamate and acetylcholine in the hippocampus and possesses cognitive-enhancing properties. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;314:1274–1289. [PubMed]
77. Douillet P, Orgogozo JM. What we have learned from the xaliproden Sanofi-Aventis trials. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:365–366. [PubMed]
78. Barten DM, Albright CF. Therapeutic strategies for Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;37:171–186. [PubMed]
79. Siemers ER, Quinn JF, Kaye J, et al. Effects of a gamma-secretase inhibitor in a randomized study of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 2006;66:602–604. [PubMed]
80. Wilcock GK, Black SE, Hendrix SB, et al. Efficacy and safety of tarenflurbil in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomised phase II trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:483–493. [PubMed]
81. Myriad Myriad genetics reports results of U.S. phase 3 trial of Flurizan™ in Alzheimer's disease. Flurizan fails to achieve significance on either co-primary endpoint; company has decided to discontinue its development of Flurizan. [30 April, 2009]. Available at: http://www.myriad.com/news/release/1170283.
82. Green RC, Schneider LS, Hendrix S, et al. Safety and efficacy of tarenflurbil in subjects with mild Alzheimer's disease: results from an 18-month multicenter phase 3 trial. Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4(Suppl 1):T165.
83. Saumier D, Aisen PS, Gauthier S, et al. Lessons learned in the use of volumetric MRI in therapeutic trials in Alzheimer's disease: the ALZHEMED (tramiprosate) experience. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:370–372. [PubMed]
84. Alzheimer Research Forum FDA deems U.S. Alzhemed trial results inconclusive. [November 2009]. Available at: http://www.alzforum.org/new/detail.asp?id=1647.
85. Gilman S, Koller M, Black RS, et al. Clinical effects of Abeta immunization (AN1792) in patients with AD in an interrupted trial. Neurology. 2005;64:1553–1562. [PubMed]
86. Nicoll JA, Wilkinson D, Holmes C, et al. Neuropathology of human Alzheimer's disease after immunization with amyloid-beta peptide: a case report. Nat Med. 2003;9:448–452. [PubMed]
87. Elan Elan and Wyeth to initiate phase 3 clinical trial of bapineuzumab (AAB-001) in Alzheimer's disease. Available at: http://www.elan.com/news/2007/20070521.asp.
88. Relkin NR, Szabo P, Adamiak B, et al. 18-month study of intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of mild Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:1728–1736. [PubMed]
89. Wyeth/Elan Elan and Wyeth announce encouraging top-line results from phase 2 clinical trial of bapineuzumab for Alzheimer's disease. Available at: http://www.wyeth.com/news?nav=display&navTo=/wyeth_html/home/news/pressreleases/2008/1213683456273.html.
90. Wyeth/Elan Elan and Wyeth plan to amend bapineuzumab phase 3 protocols. Available at: http://www.wyeth.com/news?nav=display&navTo=/wyeth_html/home/news/pressreleases/2009/1238676245463.html.
91. Pfeifer M, Boncristiano S, Bondolfi L, et al. Cerebral hemorrhage after passive anti-Abeta immunotherapy. Science. 2002;298:1379. [PubMed]
92. Vlassara H, Cai W, Crandall J, et al. Inflammatory mediators are induced by dietary glycotoxins, a major risk factor for diabetic angiopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15596–15601. [PubMed]
93. Sasaki N, Toki S, Chowei H, et al. Immunohisto-chemical distribution of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in neurons and astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 2001;888:256–262. [PubMed]
94. Chen X, Walker DG, Schmidt AM, et al. RAGE: a potential target for Abeta-mediated cellular perturbation in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7:735–742. [PubMed]
95. Lermontova NN, Lukoyanov NV, Serkova TP, et al. Dimebon improves learning in animals with experimental Alzheimer's disease. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2000;129:544–546. [PubMed]
96. Grigorev VV, Dranyi OA, Bachurin SO. Comparative study of action mechanisms of Dimebon and memantine on AMPA- and NMDA-subtypes glutamate receptors in rat cerebral neurons. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2003;136:474–477. [PubMed]
97. Lermontova NN, Redkozubov AE, Shevtsova EF, et al. Dimebon and tacrine inhibit neurotoxic action of beta-amyloid in culture and block L-type Ca(2+) channels. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2001;132:1079–1083. [PubMed]
98. Bachurin SO, Shevtsova EP, Kireeva EG, et al. Mitochondria as a target for neurotoxins and neuroprotective agents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;993:334–344. [PubMed]
99. Doody RS, Gavrilova SI, Sano M, et al. Effect of Dimebon on cognition, activities of daily living, behaviour, and global function in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2008;372:207–215. [PubMed]
100. Salehi A, Delcroix JD, Belichenko PV, et al. Increased APP expression in a mouse model of Down's syndrome disrupts NGF transport and causes cholinergic neuron degeneration. Neuron. 2006;51:29–42. [PubMed]
101. Kromer LF. Nerve growth factor treatment after brain injury prevents neuronal death. Science. 1987;235:214–216. [PubMed]
102. Fischer W, Wictorin K, Bjorklund A, et al. Amelioration of cholinergic neuron atrophy and spatial memory impairment in aged rats by nerve growth factor. Nature. 1987;329:65–68. [PubMed]
103. Conner JM, Darracq MA, Roberts J, Tuszynski MH. Nontropic actions of neurotrophins: subcortical nerve growth factor gene delivery reverses age-related degeneration of primate cortical cholinergic innervation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1941–1946. [PubMed]
104. Eriksdotter Jonhagen M, Nordberg A, Amberla K, et al. Intracerebroventricular infusion of nerve growth factor in three patients with Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1998;9:246–257. [PubMed]
105. Tuszynski MH, Thal L, Pay M, et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2005;11:551–555. [PubMed]
106. Alzforum Drugs in clinical trials: Cere-110. [November 2009]. Available at: http://www.alzforum.org/dis/tre/drc/default.asp?type=drugName&drugName=cere.
107. Howitz KT, Bitterman KJ, Cohen HY, et al. Small molecule activators of sirtuins extend Saccharomyces cerevisiae lifespan. Nature. 2003;425:191–196. [PubMed]
108. Wood JG, Rogina B, Lavu S, et al. Sirtuin activators mimic caloric restriction and delay ageing in metazoans. Nature. 2004;430:686–689. [PubMed]
109. Pearson KJ, Baur JA, Lewis KN, et al. Resveratrol delays age-related deterioration and mimics transcriptional aspects of dietary restriction without extending life span. Cell Metab. 2008;8:157–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
110. Wang J, Ho L, Zhao Z, et al. Moderate consumption of Cabernet Sauvignon attenuates Abeta neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J. 2006;20:2313–2320. [PubMed]
111. Karuppagounder SS, Pinto JT, Xu H, et al. Dietary supplementation with resveratrol reduces plaque pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Int. 2009;54:111–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
112. Terry RD. Tangles precede plaques but don't cause them. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:741–742. [PubMed]
113. Haroutunian V, Davies P, Vianna C, et al. Tau protein abnormalities associated with the progression of Alzheimer's disease type dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28:1–7. [PubMed]
114. Murayama S, Saito Y. Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease. Neuropathology. 2004;24:254–260. [PubMed]
115. Geschwind DH. Tau phosphorylation, tangles, and neurodegeneration: the chicken or the egg? Neuron. 2003;40:457–460. [PubMed]
116. Sun X, Sato S, Murayama O, et al. Lithium inhibits amyloid secretion in COS7 cells transfected with amyloid precursor protein C100. Neurosci Lett. 2002;321:61–64. [PubMed]
117. Michaelis ML, Ansar S, Chen Y, et al. β-Amyloid-induced neurodegeneration and protection by structurally diverse microtubule-stabilizing agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;312:659–668. [PubMed]
118. Butler D, Bendiske J, Michaelis ML, et al. Microtubule-stabilizing agent prevents protein accumulation-induced loss of synaptic markers. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;562:20–27. [PubMed]
119. Wischik CM, Edwards PC, Lai RY, et al. Selective inhibition of Alzheimer's disease-like tau aggregation by phenothiazines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:11213–11218. [PubMed]
120. Atamna H, Nguyen A, Schultz C, et al. Methylene blue delays cellular senescence and enhances key mitochondrial biochemical pathways. FASEB J. 2008;22:703–712. [PubMed]
121. Gura T. Hope in Alzheimer's fight emerges from unexpected places. Nat Med. 2008;14:894. [PubMed]
122. Cummings JL. Commentary on “a roadmap for the prevention of dementia II: Leon Thal Symposium 2008.” Establishing a national biomarker database: utility and incentives. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:108–113. [PubMed]
123. Aisen PS. Commentary on “a roadmap for the prevention of dementia II. Leon Thal Symposium 2008.” Facilitating Alzheimer's disease drug development in the United States. Alzheimers Dement. 2009;5:125–127. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
124. Rowe JC, Elling M, Hazlewood J, Zakhary R. A cure for clinical trials. McKinsey Q. 2002:134–141.
125. Kolata G. 40 years war: lack of study volunteers hobbles cancer fight. New York Times. 2009 August 3;
126. Physician Study: Final Report. Alzheimer's Association; Chicago, IL: 2007.
127. 2008 highlights: International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease; [November 2009]. Available at: https://www.alz.org/icad/icad 08highlights.asp.