PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jexbotLink to Publisher's site
 
J Exp Bot. 2010 August; 61(13): 3689–3696.
Published online 2010 June 25. doi:  10.1093/jxb/erq180
PMCID: PMC2921204

Brachytic2/ZmABCB1 functions in IAA export from intercalary meristems

Abstract

Dwarfism traits in Zea mays are regulated by multiple factors including the hormone auxin. Dwarf brachytic2 (br2) mutants harbour lesions in the gene encoding an orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana ABCB1 which functions in auxin efflux out of meristematic regions in the shoot and root. br2 mesocotyls and coleoptiles exhibit reduced auxin transport. However, the dwarf stature of br2 derives from shortened lower internodes whilst the upper portion of the plant is completely normal. As such, it is counter-intuitive to attribute br2 dwarfism exclusively to reduced auxin export out of the shoot apex. Arabidopsis abcb1 mutants exhibit only minor reductions in auxin transport and plant height unless combined with mutations in the ABCB19 auxin transporter. Phylogenetic modelling analysis excludes the possibility that BR2 is more closely related to ABCB19 which has three more closely related orthologues in maize. BR2 is expressed in nodal meristems, and analyses of auxin transport and content indicate that BR2 function in these grass-specific tissues is analogous to ABCB1 function in the shoot and root apex of Arabidopsis. These results indicate that ABCB1/BR2 function is conserved between dicots and monocots, but also suggests that this function must be understood in the context of the segmental organization of grass plants.

Keywords: ABC transporter, Arabidopsis, auxin, dwarfism, maize

Introduction

Dwarfism traits have been particularly beneficial for crop production, and the introduction of dwarf varieties of wheat and rice served as a cornerstone of the ‘Green Revolution’ of the late 20th century. During this period, the generation of high-yield varieties significantly increased cereal production, especially in Latin America and India (Gaud, 1968). High-yield varieties have higher nitrogen uptake capacities and exhibit increased overall growth and cell elongation. However, taller plants are more likely to lodge in response to heavy rainfall and wind, and the heavier inflorescences of high-yield elite breeds make them more susceptible to lodging. To ameliorate this negative characteristic, dwarf and semi-dwarf traits were identified and subsequently bred into these high-yield lines (Gale and Youssefian, 1985; Salamini, 2003). The most useful dwarfing traits are associated with defects in the biosynthesis or perception of the growth hormone gibberellic acid, or GA (Fig. 1; Peng et al., 1999; Monna et al., 2002). However, manipulation of GA biosynthesis and signal transduction has been a less effective strategy in Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor, as GA mutants in these species generally exhibit defects in the reproductive organs (Evans and Poethig, 1995; Miralles et al., 1998).

Fig. 1.
Model for internode elongation in monocots. Auxin and gibberellic acid (GA) interact during cellular elongation. Both auxin and gibberellic acid promote the reorientation of microtubules (MT) from random to transverse, and suppress cell wall peroxidase ...

Manipulation of auxin transport appears to be a more effective way to generate productive dwarfs in maize and sorghum (Fig. 1). The sorghum mutant dwarf3 (dw3) harbours a defect in the gene encoding the ATP binding cassette type B (ABCB) auxin transporter SbABCB1, and a maize orthologue, brachytic2 (br2), exhibits reduced seedling auxin transport, reduced mature stalk height due to shortened lower internodes, thicker stems, and altered stalk vasculature (Multani et al., 2003). Brachytic2 is an orthologue of Arabidopsis thaliana ABCB1, which has been extensively studied in Arabidopsis (reviewed in Titapiwatanakun and Murphy, 2009). ABCB1/PGP1 is expressed in shoot and root apices (Sidler et al., 1998) where it functions primarily in exporting IAA from meristematic cells into long-distance polar auxin transport streams (Noh et al., 2001; Geisler et al., 2005; Yang and Murphy, 2009). Although Arabidopsis ABCB1 shares a 62% amino acid identity with maize BR2, Arabidopsis abcb1/pgp1 mutants exhibit only a slight reduction in plant stature unless combined with a mutation in the gene encoding the ABCB19/PGP19 auxin transporter which plays a more global role in long-distance auxin movement (Noh et al., 2001; Blakeslee et al., 2007).

Sequence similarity and biochemical evidence support functional conservation of BR2 and Arabidopsis ABCB1. However, the differences observed between Arabidopsis abcb1 and maize br2 growth phenotypes suggest that while BR2/ABCB1 function in meristematic tissues is conserved, BR2 functions in intercalary as well as apical meristems. Although both monocots and dicots have a shoot apical meristem, in monocots the shoot apical meristem divides during development to form an additional meristem below the apex. This process is continuous until the onset of flowering and creates the intercalary meristems located in the nodes of a grass culm. Further, the vasculature in dicot stems is located in the central cylinder in a circular order, but is scattered in monocot stems. Depending on the species, the stem can also be hollow, consisting of leaf sheaths inserted into each other. The anatomical features of monocots could thus contribute to the more severe phenotypes observed in br2 mutants.

As the maize genome was incomplete at the time of the initial characterization of br2 (Multani et al., 2003), it is also possible that BR2 is functionally more analogous to Arabidopsis ABCB19 than ABCB1 or that maize lacks an ABCB19 equivalent. A combination of phylogenetic, phenotypic, and physiological analyses is used here to show that BR2 is the closest orthologue of Arabidopsis ABCB1 and that ABCB1 function in meristematic tissues is conserved in maize and directly underlies the phenotype of the br2 mutant.

Materials and methods

Phylogenetic analysis and synteny mapping

ABCB protein sequences were derived from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/), TIGR rice (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), NCBI (\\http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), The Maize Sequence Organization (http://www.maizesequence.org/index.html), the Plant Genome Duplication Database (PGDD, http://chibba.agtec.uga.edu/duplication/), and the Physcomitrella genome organization (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Phypa1_1/Phypa1_1. home.html). The protein alignment file was generated with ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html), using the Neighbor–Joining method. The output was set to pir and the format of the resulting file was manually changed to NEXUS format. The phylogenetic tree was generated with Mr Bayes (http://mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/). A mixed amino acid model was used. The number of generation was set to 30 000 000; however, the ‘Stopwatch’ command was enabled so that iteration stops once the standard deviation of split frequencies falls below 0.01, which was the case after about 2 500 000 generations. Sample frequency was set to 1000. Genome markers were derived from TIGR rice (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/) and MaizeGDB database (http://www.maizegdb.org/). For further analysis of syntenous regions, the Plant Genome Duplication Database (PGDD, http://chibba.agtec.uga.edu/duplication/) was consulted.

Plant material and growth conditions

Plants were grown in 20 cm pots filled with 1:1 v/v Turface:Pro-Mix growth media.

Greenhouse conditions were set to 23.9/18.3 °C day/night; RH 85/70% day/night (summer), 60/50% day/night (winter); natural light supplemented to 16 with HID lights, 100 μmol m−2 s−1 at the benchtop.

Maize stem sectioning

Maize was grown for 7 weeks and upper nodes (node 6 and above) were hand-sectioned using a razor blade. Sections were analysed under a binocular microscope. Nodes of eight individual plants were analysed.

Auxin transport and free IAA analysis

[3H]-IAA (5 μl, 20 Ci mmol−1, 10 μM solution in lanolin paste) was applied to the tip of 6-week maize plants. Stems were dissected in 1 cm segments, measured from the tip. This experiment was repeated 13 times with at least three plants in each replicate. Plant material was harvested simultaneously with the auxin transport assays from untreated plants. Free IAA measurements were performed as in Kim et al. (2007. Three repeats with three plants in each replicate were performed.

RNA extraction

Wild-type maize (Zea mays) was grown in soil for 6–8 weeks until four nodes were visible. The plant material was harvested by cutting the stem directly below the first node. After stripping the leaves, the stem was cut in 1 cm segments and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, ground using a mortar and pestle, and stored at –80 °C until RNA extraction. RNA extraction was performed with 100 mg tissue using Invitrogen plant RNA extraction reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 20 μl β-mercaptoethanol ml−1 following the manufacturer's instructions. After the isopropanol precipitation, an additional LiCl precipitation was performed (2 M LiCl final concentration, incubation at –20 °C for 20 min, centrifugation at 10 000 g at 4 °C for 20 min) to ensure complete DNA removal. This experiment was repeated twice, with three plants in each replicate.

DNase treatment, reverse transcription, and PCR

For cDNA synthesis, ~3.5 μg total RNA was treated with 0.5 U RQ1 DNAse (Promega) for 30 min at 37 °C in a total volume of 15 μl, then DNAse was inactivated with 1 μl DNAse stop solution and incubation at 80 °C for 10 min. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using oligo dT and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For PCR reactions (30 cycles, 94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) the following primers were used: BR2_2485_for (GACCCGCGGTACATGAAG), BR2_2771_rev (TTCTGGACGATGACGGAGAT), BR2_2190_for (CATCATGACGCGCAACTC), BR2_2482_rev (GCGCGTAGTAGACGCTGAG), act81/83_498_for (CCTGACTGACAGCCTGATGA), act81/83_802_rev (CGCATTTCATGATGGAGTTG).

Gibberellin quantitations

GA20 and GA1 were extracted in 80% methanol from 1 g in the presence of 25 ng 2H2 GA1 and GA20 standards, purified by Oasis-MAX SPE (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), and analysed with an Agilent 5975 GC-MS after derivatization as in Proebsting et al. (1992).

Results and discussion

Phylogenetic relationship of monocot and dicot ABCB proteins

The ABC transporter superfamily in plants expanded to a greater extent than in animals, and an unrooted tree of Arabidopsis and rice ABC transporters shows varying degrees of duplication events in different clusters (Verrier et al., 2008). The two principal Arabidopsis auxin efflux transporters, ABCB1 and ABCB19, each have a single homologue in rice (ABCB22 and ABCB14, respectively). By contrast, the cluster containing the reversible auxin transporter ABCB4 (Terasaka et al., 2005; Cho et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2007; Yang and Murphy, 2009) displays a greater number of duplication events in both rice and Arabidopsis. A more thorough analysis of monocot and dicot ABCB sequences using a rooted tree including sequences from the moss Physcomitrella patens was developed. The tree was rooted using ABCC1 (MRP1) from Arabidopsis, which is a member of the related ABC subfamily C. The phylogenetic analysis included sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana, Carica papaya, Populus trichocarpa, Vitis vinifera, Oryza sativa, Sorghum bicolor, Brachypodium distachyon, Zea mays, and Physcomitrella patens. Maize ABCB sequences were identified from the released genome sequences (http://www.maizesequence.org/index.html) as well as from the NCBI high-throughput database containing genomic sequences that have not been fully assembled. These sequences were aligned with the closest rice gene in order to determine intron–exon borders and then translated into amino acid sequences. Intron–exon ordering was also examined to ensure correct assembly of the gene models and predicted amino acid sequences.

A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of plant ABCB transporters utilized Arabidopsis and rice sequences, the bacterial ABC transporters sav1866 and MRP1 as outgroups, and the TAP/HMTs (Transporter associated with Antigen Presentation/Heavy Metal Tolerance factor) family of transporters. These transporters differ from the MDR/PGP subgroup of ABCBs, as they are ‘half-transporters’ that require dimerization for proper function (Verrier et al., 2008). However, in this analysis, very low bootstrap values of 0.59–0.68 were generated for a number of clades, and closer association was observed between the TAPs and the bacterial half transporter sav1866 than with MRP1. As such, the TAP/HMT proteins were removed from the analysis. Further, rice ABCB20 and ABCB21 and all identified homologues in other species that exhibit greater similarity to bacterial half transporters were removed.

The resulting tree (Fig. 2) can be organized into five clades (I–V). All five clades have 2–3 Physcomitrella sequences that root these clades. Clades I, II, IV, and V can be further divided into subclades (labelled a and b), suggesting an early gamma polyploidization event that preceded the split of monocots and dicots. The majority of the branch points of the tree had bootstrap values of 1.0, and the lowest observed value was 0.57. Physcomitrella genes are duplicated in all five clades. In some cases, an additional third homologue was found, consistent with the whole-genome duplication observed in Physcomitrella (Rensing et al., 2008).

Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree of plant ABCB transporters, including sequences from Arabidopsis, Vitis, Populus, Carica, Sorghum, Zea, Oryza, Brachypodium, and Physcomitrella. The phylogenetic tree can be divided into five clades (I–V). Branch numbers represent ...

The principal auxin transporters in Arabidopsis, ABCB19 and ABCB1, are located in clades II a and b, respectively (Fig. 3). BR2 groups together with Arabidopsis ABCB1 and rice ABCB22 in clade IIb. Further, the BR2/ZmABCB1 locus lies in a region syntenous to OsABCB22 (see Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online), suggesting that BR2 is indeed orthologuous to Arabidopsis ABCB1. All monocots examined have two homologues of ABCB19, suggesting that this duplication preceded speciation. Maize has an additional third homologue. However, clade IIa lies outside the Physcomitrella root, suggesting that either (i) the duplicated ABCB1/19 precursor underwent subfunctionalization in the lineage of higher plants but was lost in mosses or (ii) the duplication event producing ABCB1 and ABCB19 took place in higher plants and the grouping of subclade IIa outside the Physcomitrella root is due to a stochastic error. The second possibility cannot be excluded without more extensive genomic information from bryophytes, mosses, and ferns. However, subclade IIb contains the ABCB19-like auxin transporters that function in long-distance transport found only in higher plants, and Physcomitrella has three ‘short’ PINs that mediate intracellular auxin homeostasis, but no ‘long’ PINs that function in polar auxin transport (Mravec et al., 2009). This suggests that an ABCB19 precursor in mosses was subfunctionalized.

Fig. 3.
Phylogenetic relationship of plant ABCB transporters in Clade II. Clade II contains the two principal auxin transporter AtABCB1 and AtABCB19 in two subclades (a and b). Branch numbers represent bootstrap values. Species names are colour coded for monocots ...

Arabidopsis ABCB19 has two homologues in rice, ABCB14 and ABCB16. Both are located on chromosome 4. In maize, three sequences with high similarity to ABCB19 were identified. Two of them, ZmABCB10-1 (chromosome 10) and ZmABCB2-1 (chromosome 2), group together with OsABCB16, while the other, ZmABCB10-2 (chromosome 2), groups with OsABCB14. This could either be the result of a tandem or whole-genome duplication, which is reported to have taken place in maize (Schnable et al., 2009). Synteny mapping shows that both chromosomes 2 and 10 in maize have large regions that are syntenous to rice chromosome 4 (see Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online). Thus, it is possible that maize had or has four homologues of Arabidopsis ABCB19, although only three homologues have been identified in gene models to date. Alternatively, the fourth homologue may have been lost or is not contained in the duplicated region. Another possibility is that the Mu8 transposon sequence that contains a fragment of the BR2/ZmABCB1 gene (Multani et al., 2003) interferes with expression of the maize orthologues of Arabidopsis ABCB19, which appear to encode functionally related auxin transporters. However, recent identification of new alleles of br2 that do not involve a Mu8 transposon eliminates this possibility. Taken together, these results suggest that ZmABCB1 is orthologueous to Arabidopsis ABCB1 and that the severe dwarf phenotype of br2 results from the monocot-specific distribution of BR2 in the monocot clade.

BR2 functions in IAA re-export from intercalary meristems

When [3H]-IAA is applied to the upper stalk of maize B73 inbred plants, a front of labelled IAA moving through the stalk can be followed as it moves toward the root over time (Fig. 4A). In br2, several [3H]-IAA accumulation peaks were detected in the vicinity of the nodes, and the moving front was reduced, suggesting that BR2 indeed facilitates IAA transport across the nodal/intercalary meristem region. As polar auxin transport was maintained and the amplitude of these peaks decreased at each node, it appears that shoot-to-root polar fluxes, thought to be maintained by PIN1 and ABCB19 paralogues, are still functional. Further, these results are consistent with a role of BR2 in re-export of auxin derived from the shoot apex and leaves from the intercalary meristem and node.

Fig. 4.
BR2 functions in auxin transport in the nodal region. (A) [3H]-IAA was applied to the tip of B73 and br2 plants and 0.5 cm sections were harvested (distance measured from the top). For each experiment, a minimum of three plants were used for each genotype ...

Free IAA measurements showed that IAA levels decreased progressively and that the IAA content in nodes and the adjacent internodes of B73 were not significantly different (Fig. 4B, P >0.05). However, in br2, free IAA levels in nodes were significantly higher than in adjacent internodes (P <0.01), particularly in the upper portion of the stalk, suggesting that the shoot apex is the primary source of auxin during later development. In the lower nodes, IAA levels were reduced in both nodes and internodes and, as such, differences were not significant. These results again support BR2 facilitation of IAA reloading in the intercalary meristem.

BR2 is expressed in intercalary nodes, but not internodes

The proposed function of BR2 in auxin loading at the nodes requires that BR2 is expressed in these tissues, and the expression pattern of BR2 had not been determined previously. However, extraction of high quality RNA from the lignified maize stem poses a major technical challenge. Sectioning of nodal regions for RNA in situ hybridization is similarly difficult. Unlike leaves, reproductive tissues, and roots, the nodal region is extremely hard and difficult to grind without thawing of the tissue. In order to obtain the highest quality of RNA possible, several methods of RNA extraction were tested. Although a preferred method was determined, RNA quality was found to vary to an extent that quantitative real-time PCR was not meaningful (see Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). Thus, repetitive non-quantitative RT-PCR was performed to determine whether BR2 was expressed in a particular tissue and RNA quality was assessed by RT-PCR analysis of actin transcripts. For these experiments, tissues from three nodes and internodes starting from node 3 were used. In all cases, BR2 expression was detected in the nodes, but not in the internodes (Fig. 4C).

Altered morphology of br2 leaves and nodes

Leaves originating in lower truncated nodes of br2 (leaf 3 through leaf 7) were slimmer and more curled compared with the equivalent leaves in B73 (Fig. 5A). Leaves originating in the upper nodes were broader than those in B73. As might be expected, the leaf width phenotypes were more pronounced under low light conditions associated with reduced maize growth. The leaf phenotypes observed in br2 are consistent with altered auxin distribution. B73 treated with auxin transport inhibitors and the rough sheath 2 (rs2) mutant, in which auxin transport is reduced due to a defect in a myb-like regulator of KNOX homeobox genes, exhibit similar leaf curling and size reduction (Tsiantis et al., 1999).

Fig. 5.
The maize mutant br2 shows altered leaf development and altered vasculature in nodes immediately above shortened internodes. (A) Upper leaves of br2 are wider than in B73, whereas lower leaves are narrower and curled. This phenotype is more pronounced ...

Cross-sections of br2 stems show increased vasculature with altered distribution (Multani et al., 2003). At the nodal plexus, a portion of the vertical vasculature of the stem is redirected horizontally and forms the vasculature of the corresponding leaf. The number of vasculature bundles in the nodal plexus of br2 was found to be higher in node 7 and above (Fig. 5B). A similar pattern appears to exist in lower nodes, but could not be thoroughly analysed due to the difficulty of cutting woody nodes longitudinally. Together, these data strongly suggest that altered auxin transport mediated by BR2 in the intercalary meristem/node region underlies the altered leaf morphology observed in br2. Other downstream processes such as the regulation of cell wall extensibility and lignification by peroxidases may be influenced by altered auxin movement in br2, as cell wall peroxidise activity has been shown to be altered in the sorghum dwarf3/Sbabcb1 mutant (Schertz et al., 1971).

Interactions of auxin transport with GA signalling in br2 internodes

It is quite possible that reduced internode elongation in br2 involves interactions with GA signalling, as IAA produced in the barley shoot apex is necessary for GA1 synthesis and growth promotion in the nodal region itself (Wolbang et al., 2004). However, GA application does not rescue br2 growth phenotypes (Multani et al., 2003). Further, elongation in etiolated maize seedlings has been shown to be GA-dependent (Rood et al., 1986; Markelz et al., 2003), but br2 seedlings elongated in a manner similar to B73 under dark growth conditions and the GA biosynthetic mutants dwarf2, dwarf3, and dwarf5 did not (data not shown). Although an exhaustive analysis of GA speciation was not performed, no significant differences in GA1 or GA20 levels in nodes and internodes could be detected. Taken together, these results suggest that GA plays a limited role in reduced internode elongation in br2.

Conclusion

The results presented here indicate that the function of ABCB1 in exporting auxin from meristematic regions is conserved in monocots and dicots, despite the pronounced differences observed in loss-of-function mutants. The more pronounced phenotypes associated with loss of ABCB1 function in maize compared with Arabidopsis can be attributed primarily to ABCB1-mediated auxin export in the maize intercalary meristem. However, the diversification of ABC transporters in plants (Verrier et al., 2008) suggests that caution should be exercised in assuming that sequence homology between other ABCB transporters indicates conserved function. The central role that auxin transport plays in plant evolution and development suggests that functional conservation of ABCB1 and ABCB19 auxin transporters could be an exception rather than the rule.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Synteny mapping of maize chromosomes 1, 2, and 10 to rice chromosomes.

Fig. S2. Comparison of different RNA extraction techniques in maize.

Supplementary Material

[Supplementary Data]

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by DOE grant DE-FG02-06ER15804 to ASM.

References

  • Blakeslee JJ, Bandyopadhyay A, Lee OR, et al. Interactions among PIN-FORMED and P-glycoprotein auxin transporters in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:131–147. [PubMed]
  • Cho M, Lee SH, Cho HT. P-glycoprotein4 displays auxin efflux transporter-like action in Arabidopsis root hair cells and tobacco cells. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:3930–3943. [PubMed]
  • Evans MMS, Poethig RS. Gibberellins promote vegetative phase-change and reproductive maturity in maize. Plant Physiology. 1995;108:475–487. [PubMed]
  • Gale MD, Youssefian S, editors. Dwarfing genes in wheat. London: Butterworths, London; 1985.
  • Gaud W. The Green Revolution: accomplishments and apprehensions. The Society for International Development. 1968 http://www.agbioworld.org/biotech-info/topics/borlaug/borlaug-green.html.
  • Geisler M, Blakeslee JJ, Bouchard R, et al. Cellular efflux of auxin catalyzed by the Arabidopsis MDR/PGP transporter AtPGP1. The Plant Journal. 2005;44:179–194. [PubMed]
  • Kim JI, Sharkhuu A, Jin JB, et al. yucca6, a dominant mutation in arabidopsis, affects auxin accumulation and auxin-related phenotypes. Plant Physiology. 2007;145:722–735. [PubMed]
  • Markelz NH, Costich DE, Brutnell TP. Photomorphogenic responses in maize seedling development. Plant Physiology. 2003;133:1578–1591. [PubMed]
  • Miralles DJ, Calderini DF, Pomar KP, D'Ambrogio A. Dwarfing genes and cell dimensions in different organs of wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1998;49:1119–1127.
  • Monna L, Kitazawa N, Yoshino R, Suzuki J, Masuda H, Maehara Y, Tanji M, Sato M, Nasu S, Minobe Y. Positional cloning of rice semidwarfing gene, sd-1: rice ‘green revolution gene’ encodes a mutant enzyme involved in gibberellin synthesis. DNA Research. 2002;9:11–17. [PubMed]
  • Mravec J, Skupa P, Bailly A, et al. Subcellular homeostasis of phytohormone auxin is mediated by the ER-localized PIN5 transporter. Nature. 2009;459:1136–1140. [PubMed]
  • Multani DS, Briggs SP, Chamberlin MA, Blakeslee JJ, Murphy AS, Johal GS. Loss of an MDR transporter in compact stalks of maize br2 and sorghum dw3 mutants. Science. 2003;302:81–84. [PubMed]
  • Noh B, Murphy AS, Spalding EP. Multidrug resistance-like genes of arabidopsis required for auxin transport and auxin-mediated development. The Plant Cell. 2001;13:2441–2454. [PubMed]
  • Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, et al. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature. 1999;400:256. [PubMed]
  • Proebsting WM, Hedden P, Lewis MJ, Croker SJ, Proebsting LN. Gibberellin concentration and transport in genetic lines of pea: effect of grafting. Plant Physiology. 1992;100:1354–1360. [PubMed]
  • Rensing SA, Lang D, Zimmer AD, et al. The Physcomitrella. Science. 2008;319:64–69. [PubMed]
  • Rood SB, Beall FD, Pharis RP. Photocontrol of gibberellin metabolism in situ in maize. Plant Physiology. 1986;80:448–453. [PubMed]
  • Salamini F. Hormones and the green revolution. Science. 2003;302:71–72. [PubMed]
  • Schertz KF, Sumpter NA, Sarkissian IV, Hart GE. Peroxidase regulation by 3-dwarf height locus in sorghum. Journal of Heredity. 1971;62:235–238.
  • Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009;326:1112–1115. [PubMed]
  • Sidler M, Hassa P, Hasan S, Ringli C, Dudler R. Involvement of an ABC transporter in a developmental pathway regulating hypocotyl cell elongation in the light. The Plant Cell. 1998;10:1623–1636. [PubMed]
  • Terasaka K, Blakeslee JJ, Titapiwatanakun B, et al. PGP4, an ATP binding cassette P-glycoprotein, catalyzes auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. The Plant Cell. 2005;17:2922–2939. [PubMed]
  • Titapiwatanakun B, Murphy AS. Post-transcriptional regulation of auxin transport proteins: cellular trafficking, protein phosphorylation, protein maturation, ubiquitination, and membrane composition. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:1093–1107. [PubMed]
  • Tsiantis M, Brown MIN, Skibinski G, Langdale JA. Disruption of auxin transport is associated with aberrant leaf development in maize. Plant Physiology. 1999;121:1163–1168. [PubMed]
  • Verrier PJ, Bird D, Burla B, et al. Plant ABC proteins: a unified nomenclature and updated inventory. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13:151–159. [PubMed]
  • Wolbang CM, Chandler PM, Smith JJ, Ross JJ. Auxin from the developing inflorescence is required for the biosynthesis of active gibberellins in barley stems. Plant Physiology. 2004;134:769–776. [PubMed]
  • Wu G, Lewis DR, Spalding EP. Mutations in Arabidopsis multidrug resistance-like ABC transporters separate the roles of acropetal and basipetal auxin transport in lateral root development. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:1826–1837. [PubMed]
  • Yang H, Murphy AS. Functional expression and characterization of Arabidopsis ABCB, AUX 1 and PIN auxin transporters in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The Plant Journal. 2009;59:179–191. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press