(Bi)sulfite Oxidation by Copper,Zinc-Superoxide Dismutase: Sulfite-Derived, Radical-Initiated Protein Radical Formation

doi:10.1289/ehp.0901533

Environ Health Perspect. 2010 July; 118(7): 970–975.

Published online 2010 March 26. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901533

PMCID: PMC2920917

Copyright This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI.

Research

(Bi)sulfite Oxidation by Copper,Zinc-Superoxide Dismutase: Sulfite-Derived, Radical-Initiated Protein Radical Formation

Kalina Ranguelova,¹ Marcelo G. Bonini,² and Ronald P. Mason¹

¹ Laboratory of Pharmacology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

² Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Address correspondence to K. Ranguelova, NIEHS, MD F0-02, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3866. Fax: (919) 541-1043. E-mail: RanguelovaK/at/niehs.nih.gov

The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Received October 2, 2009; Accepted March 26, 2010.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Background

Sulfur dioxide, formed during the combustion of fossil fuels, is a major air pollutant near large cities. Its two ionized forms in aqueous solution, sulfite and (bi)sulfite, are widely used as preservatives and antioxidants to prevent food and beverage spoilage. (Bi)sulfite can be oxidized by peroxidases to form the very reactive sulfur trioxide anion radical (^•SO₃⁻). This free radical further reacts with oxygen to form the peroxymonosulfate anion radical (⁻O₃SOO^•) and sulfate anion radical (SO₄^{• −}).

Objective

To explore the critical role of these radical intermediates in further oxidizing biomolecules, we examined the ability of copper,zinc-superoxide dismutase (Cu,Zn-SOD) to initiate this radical chain reaction, using human serum albumin (HSA) as a model target.

Methods

We used electron paramagnetic resonance, optical spectroscopy, oxygen uptake, and immuno-spin trapping to study the protein oxidations driven by sulfite-derived radicals.

Results

We found that when Cu,Zn-SOD reacted with (bi)sulfite, ^•SO₃⁻ was produced, with the concomitant reduction of SOD-Cu(II) to SOD-Cu(I). Further, we demonstrated that sulfite oxidation mediated by Cu,Zn-SOD induced the formation of radical-derived 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) spin-trapped HSA radicals.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that protein oxidative damage resulting from (bi)sulfite oxidation promoted by Cu,Zn-SOD could be involved in oxidative damage and tissue injury in (bi)sulfite-exacerbated allergic reactions.

Keywords: ESR spin trapping, immuno-spin trapping, sulfite radicals, sulfite toxicity

Sulfur dioxide is one of the major atmospheric pollutants, but its two ionized forms in aqueous solution at neutral pH, sulfite (SO₃²⁻) and (bi)sulfite (HSO₃⁻), are widely used as antioxidants and preservatives in beverages and foods (Danilewicz 2003). However, the prevalence of sulfite toxicity is relatively high, and it has been associated with allergic reactions characterized by sulfite sensitivity, asthma, and anaphylactic shock (Komarnisky et al. 2003). Sensitive individuals can experience such adverse reactions when they consume sulfites, with asthmatics being particularly vulnerable to such toxicity.

Sulfite is detoxified in the liver and lung to sulfate by sulfite oxidase, a molybdenum-dependent mitochondrial enzyme (Cohen and Fridovich 1971); sulfite oxidase deficiency is one of the most accepted causes of sulfite hypersensitivity and toxicity. This enzymatically catalyzed oxidation has been shown to proceed via a two-electron oxidation without the formation of any detectable radical intermediates. In contrast, recent studies suggest that the cytotoxicity of (bi)sulfite is mediated by free radicals, because (bi)sulfite increases reactive oxygen species formation, and antioxidants and free radical scavengers prevent its toxicity (Niknahad and O’Brien 2008). In addition, transition metals catalyze the autoxidation of (bi)sulfite via sulfur trioxide anion radical (^•SO₃⁻) formation:

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is ehp-118-970e1.jpg

where M may be copper (Cu²⁺), iron (Fe³⁺), oxivanadium anion (VO²⁺), manganese (Mn²⁺), nickel (Ni²⁺), or chromate anion (CrO₄^{2 −}) (Alipazaga et al. 2004; Berglund et al. 1993; Brandt and Elding 1998; Lima et al. 2002; Shi 1994), but this reaction requires higher concentrations of (bi)sulfite to permit effective propagation of the chain reaction. In a recent study, Alipazaga et al. ( 2009) reported oxidative DNA damage induced by (bi)sulfite solutions in the presence of Cu(II) peptide complexes. It has also been shown that free radicals have been produced by enzymatic initiation of the oxidation of (bi)sulfite by prostaglandin H synthase (Mottley et al. 1982a) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Araiso et al. 1976; Mottley et al. 1982b), with formation of ^•SO₃⁻. This predominantly sulfur-centered radical (Chantry et al. 1962) reacts with molecular oxygen by forming the peroxymonosulfate anion radical (⁻O₃SOO^•), which is a precursor of the sulfate anion radical (SO₄^{• −}) (Neta et al. 1988):

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is ehp-118-970e2.jpg

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is ehp-118-970e3.jpg

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is ehp-118-970e4.jpg

SO₄^{• −} is a very strong oxidant, nearly as strong as the hydroxyl radical, and it is very likely to oxidize other biomolecules by one-electron oxidation.

It is possible that bisulfite may also lead to further reactive sulfur species via the peroxidase activity of enzymes such as copper,zinc-superoxide dismutase (Cu,Zn-SOD), a metalloenzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of the superoxide anion into O₂ and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). At high pH, Cu,Zn-SOD exhibits peroxidase activity, with the initial step of the peroxidase cycle being a reduction of SOD-Cu(II) by H₂O₂ or its deprotonated form, HO₂ ⁻, to SOD-Cu(I) (Bonini et al. 2009; Fuchs and Borders 1983; Hodgson and Fridovich 1973). At neutral pH, the peroxidase activity of Cu,Zn-SOD is stimulated in the presence of bicarbonate (HCO₃ ⁻) buffer (Bonini et al. 2004; Liochev and Fridovich 2004; Zhang et al. 2000). It has been proposed that at pH 7.4, anions structurally similar to HCO₃ ⁻, such as (bi)sulfite (HSO₃ ⁻) and (bi)selenite (HSeO₃ ⁻), may also stimulate the peroxidase activity of Cu,Zn-SOD in the presence of millimolar H₂O₂ (Sankarapandi and Zweier 1999).

In the present study, we evaluated the role of Cu,Zn-SOD in (bi)sulfite oxidation and found that, under our experimental conditions, SOD1-Cu(II) is slowly reduced to SOD1-Cu(I) by (bi)sulfite. We used optical spectroscopy, electron spin resonance (ESR), and oxygen uptake experiments to demonstrate that (bi)sulfite (as Na₂SO₃) was a one-electron donor substrate for Cu,Zn-SOD, leading to the generation of reactive sulfur radicals via Equations 2–4. We also applied immuno-spin trapping with 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) to investigate oxidation of target proteins [e.g., human serum albumin (HSA) at plasma levels] to protein radicals (Figure 1). We found that (bi)sulfite oxidation mediated by Cu,Zn-SOD generated the formation of HSA radicals, which might be responsible for the tissue injury in allergic reactions to (bi)sulfite.

Figure 1

Proposed mechanism of protein oxidative damage induced by the Cu,Zn-SOD–(bi)sulfite system.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

We purchased bovine kidney superoxide dismutase (SOD) from Calzyme Laboratories Inc. (San Luis Obispo, CA). HSA (99.99% purity), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), sodium sulfite, thiocyanate, azide, cyanide, and H₂O₂ (obtained as a 30% solution) were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). We determined the H₂O₂ concentration from its absorbance at 240 nm ( epsilon

= 39.4 M ⁻¹cm ⁻¹). DMPO (high purity, ≥ 99%) from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA) was sublimed twice under vacuum at room temperature and stored under an argon atmosphere at −80°C before use. Chelex-100 resin was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA).

ESR spectroscopy

We obtained ESR spin-trapping data at room temperature using a Bruker EMX spectrometer with 100 kHz modulation frequency and equipped with an ER 4122 SHQ cavity (Bruker BioSpin Corp., Billerica, MA). We placed samples in a 10-mm flat cell (200 μL final volume) and initiated recording of the spectra within 1 min of the start of the reaction.

We recorded low-temperature ESR data at 77 K after the indicated incubation times. Initially, we mixed SOD with (bi)sulfite at room temperature; after incubation, we transferred the reaction mixtures into 1-mL polyethylene syringes and froze them in liquid nitrogen. We added glycerol (10%) to the samples before freezing to prevent cracking of the frozen texture.

Oxygen uptake

For oxygen uptake measurements, we added 500 μL sodium sulfite to a chamber equipped with a Clark electrode and a stirrer. We initiated the reaction (1.8 mL) by SOD, and the oxygen uptake curves were obtained at room temperature with an oxygen monitor (model 53; Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH).

Chemical reactions

Typically, we carried out reactions of 600 μM HSA, 500 μM Na₂SO₃, and 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD in the presence or absence of 5 mM DMPO in 100 mM phosphate buffer (Chelex-treated with 25 μM DTPA) at pH 7.4 in a total volume of 30 μL. After 1 hr of incubation at 37°C, we stopped reactions with 5 mM reduced glutathione and then diluted the samples with deionized H₂O for electrophoresis and immuno-spin trapping analyses.

Coomassie blue stain, Western blot, and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)

We electrophoresed the reaction mixtures under reducing conditions through duplicate 4–12% BisTris NuPage acylamide gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). We performed Western blotting and ELISA analysis as previously described (Detweiler et al. 2002) with minor changes (we used fish gelatin instead of casein to prevent the nonspecific binding sites).

Optical spectroscopy

We recorded optical data on a Cary 100 spectrophotometer (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA) using a 500 μM quartz cuvette. We determined Cu,Zn-SOD concentration from the broad band at 680 nm ( epsilon

= 300 M⁻¹cm⁻¹ in the bovine enzyme), which results from the d-d transitions of the Cu atom (Foti et al. 1997). We carried out reactions in 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. Cu,Zn-SOD (1 mM) was added first, followed by 20 mM (bi)sulfite, and each scan was recorded every 3 min for 30 min.

Results

(Bi)sulfite oxidation by Cu,Zn-SOD detected by optical spectroscopy, ESR, and oxygen uptake

When we added a 20-fold excess of (bi)sulfite to 1 mM Cu,Zn-SOD, the absorption band at 680 nm characteristic of the active site of SOD1-Cu(II) decreased slowly, then completely disappeared as the wild-type protein was reduced to Cu(I) (Figure 2A). We recorded the optical spectra every 3 min, and within < 30 min we observed a full reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) by (bi)sulfite. However, lower concentrations of protein (50 μM) and (bi)sulfite (500 μM) were sufficient for low-temperature ESR spectra to detect the reduction of Cu(II) in Cu,Zn-SOD (Figure 2B). ESR data showed that the addition of a 10-fold excess of (bi)sulfite to Cu,Zn-SOD followed by a 1-hr incubation resulted in an approximately 40% decrease in ESR intensity compared with the untreated protein (Figure 2B). The anisotropic hyperfine coupling constant (A_|| = 135 G) remained unchanged during the incubation time, indicating that (bi)sulfite does not bind directly to the active site Cu(II) (Strothkamp and Lippard 1981).

Figure 2

(A) Reduction of Cu,Zn-SOD by (bi)sulfite; optical spectra were observed from 1 mM Cu,Zn-SOD in phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4) in the presence of 20 mM Na₂SO₃ and were recorded every 3 min. (B) Effect of (bi)sulfite on the ESR spectra of the active-site (more ...)

To determine whether (bi)sulfite is oxidized by Cu(II) in Cu,Zn-SOD, we also performed room-temperature ESR spin-trapping experiments. When we mixed Cu,Zn-SOD (50 μM) with (bi)sulfite (500 μM) in the presence of the spin trap DMPO (100 mM), it generated an intense ESR signal (Figure 3A, spectrum a) corresponding to the assigned ^•SO₃⁻ adduct of DMPO, DMPO/^•SO₃⁻ (a^H_β= 16.0 G and a^N = 14.7 G) (Mottley and Mason 1988; Mottley et al. 1982a, 1982b). Previous studies have shown that (bi)sulfite stimulates the peroxidase function of Cu,Zn-SOD and that ^•SO₃⁻ is formed when the protein is treated with 1 mM H₂O₂ in the presence of 20 mM (bi)sulfite (Sankarapandi and Zweier 1999). According to the authors, control experiments in the absence of Cu,Zn-SOD confirmed that the ^•SO₃⁻ signal was not due to direct oxidation of (bi)sulfite by H₂O₂, which is known from the literature (Flockhart et al. 1971; Mottley et al. 1982a) to proceed nonenzymatically at high concentrations of H₂O₂ via the following reaction:

Figure 3

(A) ESR spectra of DMPO/^•SO₃⁻ generated by Cu,Zn-SOD and (bi)sulfite. Spectrum a was detected by mixing 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD, 100 mM DMPO, 500 μM Na₂SO₃, and 100 μM H₂O₂ in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and then recorded (more ...)

A mathematical equation, expression, or formula.
Object name is ehp-118-970e5.jpg

To determine the effect of low and nontoxic concentration of H₂O₂ (100 μM) and to confirm that ^•SO₃⁻ is generated because of the enzymatic oxidation of (bi)sulfite, we performed control experiments in the presence and absence of H₂O₂. Contrary to expectation (Sankarapandi and Zweier 1999), addition of 100 μM H₂O₂ had almost no effect on the ESR intensity of DMPO/^•SO₃⁻ (Figure 3A, spectra a and b), and omission of (bi)sulfite (Na₂SO₃) or Cu,Zn-SOD resulted in no radical adduct formation (Figure 3A, spectra c and d, respectively). Control experiments confirmed that the reaction is insensitive to catalase, implying that H₂O₂ is not involved (data not shown).

The proposed mechanism of enzymatic oxidation of (bi)sulfite to ^•SO₃⁻ by the active Cu(II) site of Cu,Zn-SOD proceeds in a one-electron reduction reaction of Cu(II) by (bi)sulfite, similar to the oxidation of (bi)sulfite by HRP and prostaglandin H synthase (Mottley and Mason 1988; Mottley 1982a, 1982b; Roman and Dunford 1973). The resulting ^•SO₃⁻ is known to react further with molecular oxygen to form ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −} in the free radical chain mechanism previously reported (Hayon et al. 1972; Mottley and Mason 1988; Reed et al. 1986). To confirm our hypothesis, we next investigated the consumption of oxygen by 500 μM (bi)sulfite, with the reaction initiated by 0–500 μM Cu,Zn-SOD. When ^•SO₃⁻ reacted with oxygen in the absence of spin trap, we observed oxygen consumption strongly dependent on the Cu,Zn-SOD concentration (Figure 3B). Addition of 500 μM Cu,Zn-SOD resulted in approximately 30% oxygen consumption after 15 min. When we examined the effect of the spin trap DMPO using 500 μM Na₂SO₃ and 500 μM Cu,Zn-SOD as the initiator, prior or later additions of 100 mM DMPO (the same amount used for the spin-trapping ESR data) almost completely prevented oxygen uptake (Figure 3B), that is, no radical chain reactions ended in the formation of ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −}.

To characterize the importance of Cu redox cycling at the enzyme-active site upon the generation of ^•SO₃⁻, we mixed 500 μM Na₂SO₃ with selected inhibitors and initiated the reactions by 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD in the presence of 100 mM DMPO (Figure 4). The ESR intensity of the spectra showed that addition of 500 μM thiocyanate, azide, or cyanide in the presence of an equimolar amount of (bi)sulfite significantly inhibited ^•SO₃⁻ production. These results strongly suggest that because these anions bind directly to the Cu with high affinity, the enzymatic activity of Cu,Zn-SOD is inhibited, and no further oxidation of (bi)sulfite to sulfite-derived radicals is possible.

Figure 4

Effect of Cu,Zn-SOD inhibitors on the ESR intensity of DMPO/^•SO₃⁻ adducts. Spectrum a was observed from Cu,Zn-SOD (50 μM), Na₂SO₃ (500 μM), and DMPO (100 mM) in phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4) and recorded immediately (more ...)

Formation of HSA-DMPO nitrone adducts induced by the Cu,Zn-SOD-(bi)sulfite system as determined by immuno-spin trapping

The optical and ESR data showed that (bi)sulfite is oxidized by Cu,Zn-SOD to ^•SO₃⁻, which will initiate the radical chain reaction with formation of ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −} via Equations 2–4. To characterize the ability of these radicals to oxidize amino acid(s) in target proteins, we incubated HSA with the enzyme and (bi)sulfite in the presence of DMPO and analyzed the reaction products by Western blotting using an anti-DMPO polyclonal antibody (Detweiler et al. 2002). We chose a concentration of DMPO that was much less than the 100 mM used for the ESR and oxygen uptake, so as to not inhibit the chain reaction yet be sufficient for the protein radicals to react with DMPO for detection by anti-DMPO antibody. We achieved the overall high yield of protein DMPO nitrone adducts by decreasing the DMPO concentration to 5 mM in the presence of the plasma concentration of HSA (600 μM). We mixed samples containing 600 μM HSA with 500 μM Na₂SO₃ in the presence of 5 mM DMPO and initiated the reactions with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD. Coomassie blue staining of the gel verified the amount of HSA present in all treatments and showed the presence of a single band at 60 kDa, which corresponds to the size of albumin, together with a small amount of HSA dimer at approximately 120 kDa (Figure 5A). We also detected a very weak band at approximately 15 kDa at a Cu,Zn-SOD concentration of 50 μM, corresponding to its monomer. We performed immunochemical detection of HSA–DMPO nitrone adducts using Western blotting and ELISA in parallel with SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 5B, samples lacking Cu,Zn-SOD, DMPO, or Na₂SO₃ contained negligible anti-DMPO cross- reacting material. Incubation of HSA with > 10 μM Cu,Zn-SOD resulted in a significant increase in HSA-DMPO–derived nitrone adducts as assessed by ELISA (Figure 5C). This result, together with the oxygen uptake experiments, demonstrated that 5 mM DMPO, because it did not trap the entire primary ^•SO₃⁻, allowed the radical chemistry in Equations 2–4 to proceed with the formation of the damaging radical intermediates.

Figure 5

Concentration-dependent effects of Cu,Zn-SOD on the formation of HSA radical-derived nitrone adducts shown by (A) Coomassie blue staining, (B) anti-DMPO Western blotting, or (C) ELISA analysis. Abbreviations: d, dimer; m, monomer. Reactions including (more ...)

HSA-derived nitrone adducts also depended on the (bi)sulfite concentration (Figure 6A). Omission of HSA, DMPO, (bi)sulfite, or Cu,Zn-SOD resulted in no immunostaining above the background level. When 0.1 mM (bi)sulfite and 600 μM albumin were oxidized in the presence of 5 mM DMPO and 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD, we detected a faint band of DMPO–nitrone adducts. Western blotting performed on reactions containing 0.25–3 mM (bi)sulfite showed increased production of DMPO-HSA radical-derived nitrone adducts and very weak bands of DMPO-HSA dimer at the higher (bi)sulfite concentrations.

Figure 6

(A) Concentration-dependent effects of Na₂SO₃ on the formation of HSA radical-derived nitrone adducts. Reactions—including HSA (600 μM), DMPO (5 mM), and (bi)sulfite, as indicated—were initiated with 50 μM SOD, and the (more ...)

We also determined the effect of time on the formation of HSA radical-derived nitrone adducts (Figure 6B,C). In the presence of 5 mM DMPO, 500 μM Na₂SO₃, and 50 μM Cu,Zn-SOD, Western blotting showed that DMPO-HSA radical-derived nitrone adduct production increased with reaction time, reaching saturation at about 1 hr. ELISA data paralleled those from Western blotting (Figure 6C).

Discussion

The present data confirm that the enzymatic oxidation of (bi)sulfite by Cu,Zn-SOD proceeds via a radical mechanism as demonstrated using optical spectroscopy, oxygen uptake, and ESR experiments. Similar results have been reported for some peroxidases (e.g., HRP, prostaglandin H synthase) (Araiso et al. 1976; Mottley et al. 1982a, 1982b). Once the (bi)sulfite is oxidized by Cu(II) in Cu,Zn-SOD and ^•SO₃⁻ is formed, it reacts very rapidly with oxygen and generates ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −} (Hayon et al. 1972), which—as very powerful oxidants (E⁻_O³SOO^•_/ ⁻_O³SOOH = 1.1 V, E_SO⁴^{• −}_/SO⁴²⁻ = 2.43 V)—can attack target proteins (e.g., HSA in plasma) (Neta et al. 1988; Steele and Appelman 1982) (Figure 1). Previous work on the oxidation of (bi)sulfite by the HRP–H₂O₂ system and ESR spin-trapping experiments showed that there is a strong competition between the spin trap DMPO and oxygen for ^•SO₃⁻ (Ranguelova and Mason 2009). In fact, in the latter system, the formation of the oxygen-derived radicals ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −} was almost prevented by high DMPO concentrations (100 mM) (Figure 3B), and a decrease of the spin-trap concentration to ≤ 3 mM was required to trap protein radicals formed by ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −} (Mottley and Mason 1988). The very slow consumption of oxygen observed even in the presence of 100 mM DMPO is likely due to the rapid reaction of ^•SO₃⁻ with oxygen at a diffusion-controlled rate to form ⁻O₃SOO^•, which then reacts with SO₃²⁻ to produce SO₄^{• −} (Figure 1).

(Bi)sulfite is one of the few sulfating agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a food preservative and antioxidant to prevent or reduce spoilage (Gunnison 1981). However, sulfites have been associated with adverse allergic and asthmatic reactions experienced by sulfite-hypersensitive individuals. The most frequent sulfite-reaction symptoms are difficulty in breathing, food intolerance symptoms, asthma, and occasionally anaphylactic shock. There is no specific treatment for sulfite toxicity, and in general, to our knowledge, the mechanisms of the potentially toxic reactions of (bi)sulfite are poorly understood.

One reason for the toxic potential of (bi)sulfite is a deficiency of sulfite oxidase, the molybdenum-containing enzyme that oxidizes sulfite to sulfate (SO₄²⁻), and it is noteworthy that in cases of sulfite oxidase deficiency, the concentration of sulfite in plasma is abnormal (> 1 mM) (Acosta et al. 1989; Johnson et al. 1980). The capacity of sulfite oxidase for sulfite oxidation is extremely high, with the reaction proceeding via a one-step, two-electron oxidation to sulfate with no free radical intermediates (Cohen and Fridovich 1971). However, Yokoyama et al. (1971) showed that inhaled sulfur dioxide does reach the blood plasma, where the dissolved SO₂ [(bi)sulfite] forms oxidation products other than sulfate, such as S-sulfonates (Bechtold et al. 1993); this indicates the presence of another mechanism of (bi)sulfite oxidation besides the well-known sulfite oxidase route. Another radical mechanism of xanthine-dependent aerobic oxidation of (bi)sulfite in the presence of xanthine oxidase has been proposed by McCord and Fridovich (1968). The authors concluded that xanthine oxidase, when catalyzing the aerobic oxidation of xanthine, generated a superoxide anion, which then served to initiate the (bi)sulfite chain reaction. A previous report from our laboratory (Mottley et al. 1982b) demonstrated that incubation of (bi)sulfite with HRP and H₂O₂ is not sensitive to the presence of SOD, confirming that the peroxidase-catalyzed pathway does not involve a superoxide chain reaction.

In the present study we used Cu,Zn-SOD⁻ (bi)sulfite as a source for generation of oxidants (⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −}) that are diffusible and radicals themselves to show their capability to oxidize the most abundant plasma protein (albumin) to protein radicals (Figure 1). Our Western blot experiments showed that in the presence of DMPO, the Cu,Zn-SOD–(bi)sulfite system produced sulfite-derived radicals that oxidized albumin to produce protein-centered radicals trapped by the nitrone spin-trap DMPO and detected as DMPO-HSA nitrone adducts. When DMPO or any of the other system components were eliminated, no immunostaining appeared above the background signal levels, confirming that all of the reactants are needed for detection of radicals. The extent of immuno-spin trapping increased with spin-trap concentrations up to 10 mM and then decreased (data not shown). These results are consistent with the oxygen uptake experiments discussed above and with the ESR data for SO₄^{• −} (Mottley and Mason 1988), showing that lower concentrations of the spin trap must be used so that all the primary radicals are not trapped but have a chance for further reaction. Moreover, recent studies have confirmed the ability of DMPO to trap different protein radicals from the same system by varying its concentration (Bhattacharjee et al. 2007). Production of HSA nitrone adducts was also dependent on (bi)sulfite and Cu,Zn-SOD concentrations; only 500 μM (bi)sulfite was sufficient to detect positive results on the anti-DMPO Western blots, whereas (bi)sulfite concentration in wines, where it is used as a preservative, is 6 mM (Gunnison 1981).

In summary, our study showed that Cu,Zn-SOD⁻ (bi)sulfite provides an enzymatic pathway to generate the reactive intermediates ⁻O₃SOO^• and SO₄^{• −}, which oxidize HSA residues to protein radicals. We also propose that Cu,Zn-SOD may contribute to oxidative damage and tissue injury in (bi)sulfite (sulfur dioxide)–exacerbated allergic reactions. Our results suggest that SOD-dependent, sulfite-mediated oxidation of albumin residues is likely to occur in vivo, particularly at sites where Cu,Zn-SOD concentration is higher. Further studies are necessary to clarify whether alterations in Cu,Zn-SOD activity affect (bi)sulfite toxicity.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

We thank M.J. Mason and A. Motten for their help in the preparation of the manuscript.

References

Acosta R, Granados J, Mourelle M, Perez-Alvarez V, Quezada E. Sulfite sensitivity: relationship between sulfite plasma levels and bronchospasm: case report. Ann Allergy. 1989;62(5):402–405. [PubMed]
Alipazaga MV, Cerchiaro G, Moya HD, Coichev N. Oxidative DNA damage induced by S(IV) in the presence of Cu(II) and Cu(I) complexes. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009;20(7):1302–1312.
Alipazaga MV, Moreno RGM, Coichev N. Synergistic effect of Ni(II) and Co(II) ions on the sulfite induced autoxidation of Cu(II)/tetraglycine complex. Dalton Trans. 2004;13:2036–2040. [PubMed]
Araiso T, Miyoshi K, Yamazaki I. Mechanisms of electron transfer from sulfite to horseradish peroxidase-hydroperoxide compounds. Biochemistry. 1976;15(14):3059–3063. [PubMed]
Bechtold WE, Waide JJ, Sandstrom T, Stjernberg N, McBride D, Koenig J, et al. Biological markers of exposure to SO₂: S-sulfonates in nasal lavage. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1993;3(4):371–382. [PubMed]
Berglund J, Fronaeus S, Elding LI. Kinetics and mechanism for manganese-catalyzed oxidation of sulfur(IV) by oxygen in aqueous solution. Inorg Chem. 1993;32:4527–4538.
Bhattacharjee S, Deterding LJ, Jiang J, Bonini MG, Tomer KB, Ramirez DC, et al. Electron transfer between a tyrosyl radical and a cysteine residue in hemoproteins: spin trapping analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(44):13493–13501. [PubMed]
Bonini MG, Fernandes DC, Augusto O. Albumin oxidation to diverse radicals by the peroxidase activity of Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase in the presence of bicarbonate or nitrite: diffusible radicals produce cysteinyl and solvent-exposed and -unexposed tyrosyl radicals. Biochemistry. 2004;43(2):344–351. [PubMed]
Bonini MG, Gabel SA, Ranguelova K, Stadler K, Derose EF, London RE, et al. Direct magnetic resonance evidence for peroxymonocarbonate involvement in the Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase peroxidase catalytic cycle. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(21):14618–14627. [PubMed]
Brandt C, Elding LI. Role of chromium and vanadium in the atmospheric oxidation of sulfur (IV) Atmos Environ. 1998;32(4):797–800.
Chantry GW, Horsfield A, Morton JR, Rowlands JR, Whiffen DH. The optical and electron resonance spectra of SO₃⁻ Mol Phys. 1962;5(3):233–239.
Cohen HJ, Fridovich I. Hepatic sulfite oxidase. Purification and properties. J Biol Chem. 1971;246(2):359–366. [PubMed]
Danilewicz JC. Review of reaction mechanisms of oxygen and proposed intermediate reduction products in wine: central role of iron and copper. Am J Enol Vitic. 2003;54(2):73–85.
Detweiler CD, Deterding LJ, Tomer KB, Chignell CF, Germolec D, Mason RP. Immunological identification of the heart myoglobin radical formed by hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;33(3):364–369. [PubMed]
Flockhart BD, Ivin KJ, Pink RC, Sharma BD. The nature of the radical intermediates in the reactions between hydroperoxides and sulphur dioxide and their reaction with alkene derivatives: electron spin resonance study. J Chem Soc D. 1971;7:339–340.
Foti D, Lo Curto B, Cuzzocrea G, Stroppolo ME, Polizio F, Venanzi M, et al. Spectroscopic characterization of recombinant Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase from Photobacterium leiognathi expressed in Escherichia coli: evidence for a novel catalytic copper binding site. Biochemistry. 1997;36(23):7109–7113. [PubMed]
Fuchs HJR, Borders CL., Jr Affinity inactivation of bovine Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase by hydroperoxide anion, HO₂⁻ Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1983;116(3):1107–1113. [PubMed]
Gunnison AF. Sulphite toxicity: a critical review of in vitro and in vivo data. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1981;19(5):667–682. [PubMed]
Hayon E, Treinin A, Wilf J. Electronic spectra, photochemistry, and autoxidation mechanism of the sulfite-bisulfite-pyrosulfite systems. The SO₂⁻, SO₃⁻, SO₄⁻, and SO₅⁻ radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 1972;94(1):47–57.
Hodgson EK, Fridovich I. Reversal of the superoxide dismutase reaction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;54(1):270–274. [PubMed]
Johnson JL, Waud WR, Rajagopalan KV, Duran M, Beemer FA, Wadman SK. Inborn errors of molybdenum metabolism: combined deficiencies of sulfite oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase in a patient lacking the molybdenum cofactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77(6):3715–3719. [PubMed]
Komarnisky LA, Christopherson RJ, Basu TK. Sulfur: its clinical and toxicologic aspects. Nutrition. 2003;19(1):54–61. [PubMed]
Lima S, Bonifacio RL, Azzellini GC, Coichev N. Ruthenium(II) tris(bipyridyl) ion as a luminescent probe for oxygen uptake on the catalyzed oxidation of HSO₃⁻ Talanta. 2002;56:547–556. [PubMed]
Liochev SI, Fridovich I. CO₂, not HCO₃⁻, facilitates oxidations by Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase plus H₂O₂. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(3):743–744. [PubMed]
McCord JM, Fridovich I. The reduction of cytochrome c by milk xanthine oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1968;243(21):5753–5760. [PubMed]
Mottley C, Mason RP. Sulfate anion free radical formation by the peroxidation of (bi)sulfite and its reaction with hydroxyl radical scavengers. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988;267(2):681–689. [PubMed]
Mottley C, Mason RP, Chignell CF, Sivarajah K, Eling TE. The formation of sulfur trioxide radical anion during the prostaglandin hydroperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation of bisulfite (hydrated sulfur dioxide) J Biol Chem. 1982a;257(9):5050–5055. [PubMed]
Mottley C, Trice TB, Mason RP. Direct detection of the sulfur trioxide radical anion during the horseradish peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide oxidation of sulfite (aqueous sulfur dioxide) Mol Pharmacol. 1982b;22(3):732–737. [PubMed]
Neta P, Huie RE, Ross AB. Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1988;17(3):1027–1284.
Niknahad H, O’Brien PJ. Mechanism of sulfite cytotoxicity in isolated rat hepatocytes. Chem Biol Interact. 2008;174(3):147–154. [PubMed]
Ranguelova K, Mason RP. New insights into the detection of sulfur trioxide anion radical by spin trapping: radical trapping versus nucleophilic addition. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009;47(2):128–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Reed GA, Curtis JF, Mottley C, Eling TE, Mason RP. Epoxidation of (+/−)-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[α]pyrene during (bi)sulfite autoxidation: activation of a procarcinogen by a cocarcinogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83(19):7499–7502. [PubMed]
Roman R, Dunford HB. Studies on horseradish peroxidase. XII. A kinetic study of the oxidation of sulfite and nitrite by compounds I and II. Can J Chem. 1973;51:588–596.
Sankarapandi S, Zweier JL. Bicarbonate is required for the peroxidase function of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase at physiological pH. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(3):1226–1232. [PubMed]
Shi X. Generation of SO₃⁻ and OH radicals in SO₃²⁻ reactions with inorganic environmental pollutants and its implications to SO₃²⁻ toxicity. J Inorg Biochem. 1994;56(3):155–165. [PubMed]
Steele WV, Appelman EH. The standard enthalpy of formation of peroxymonosulfate (HSO₅⁻) and the standard electrode potential of the peroxymonosulfate-bisulfate couple. J Chem Thermodynamics. 1982;14:337–344.
Strothkamp KG, Lippard SJ. Anion binding to the four-copper form of bovine erythrocyte superoxide dismutase: mechanistic implications. Biochemistry. 1981;20(26):7488–7493. [PubMed]
Yokoyama E, Yoder RE, Frank NR. Distribution of ³⁵S in the blood and its excretion in urine dogs exposed to ³⁵SO₂. Arch Environ Health. 1971;22(3):389–395. [PubMed]
Zhang H, Joseph J, Felix C, Kalyanaraman B. Bicarbonate enhances the hydroxylation, nitration, and peroxidation reactions catalyzed by copper, zinc superoxide dismutase. Intermediacy of carbonate anion radical. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(19):14038–14045. [PubMed]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of
National Institute of Environmental Health Science