Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of envhperEnvironmental Health PerspectivesBrowse ArticlesAbout EHPGeneral InformationAuthorsMediaProgramsPartnerships
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 July; 118(7): 1027–1032.
Published online 2010 March 1. doi:  10.1289/ehp.0901376
PMCID: PMC2920903
Children's Health

Relationship between Environmental Phthalate Exposure and the Intelligence of School-Age Children



Concern over phthalates has emerged because of their potential toxicity to humans.


We investigated the relationship between the urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites and children’s intellectual functioning.


This study enrolled 667 children at nine elementary schools in five South Korean cities. A cross-sectional examination of urine phthalate concentrations was performed, and scores on neuropsychological tests were obtained from both the children and their mothers.


We measured mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl)phthalate (MEOHP), both metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), a metabolite of dibutyl phthalate (DBP), in urine samples. The geometric mean (ln) concentrations of MEHP, MEOHP, and MBP were 21.3 μg/L [geometric SD (GSD) = 2.2 μg/L; range, 0.5–445.4], 18.0 μg/L (GSD = 2.4; range, 0.07–291.1), and 48.9 μg/L (GSD = 2.2; range, 2.1–1645.5), respectively. After adjusting for demographic and developmental covariates, the Full Scale IQ and Verbal IQ scores were negatively associated with DEHP metabolites but not with DBP metabolites. We also found a significant negative relationship between the urine concentrations of the metabolites of DEHP and DBP and children’s vocabulary subscores. After controlling for maternal IQ, a significant inverse relationship between DEHP metabolites and vocabulary subscale score remained. Among boys, we found a negative association between increasing MEHP phthalate concentrations and the sum of DEHP metabolite concentrations and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children vocabulary score; however, among girls, we found no significant association between these variables.


Controlling for maternal IQ and other covariates, the results show an inverse relationship between phthalate metabolites and IQ scores; however, given the limitations in cross-sectional epidemiology, prospective studies are needed to fully explore these associations.

Keywords: children, cognition, dibutyl phthalate (DBP), di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), IQ, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP), mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), phthalate, sex

Phthalates are mostly used as plasticizers or softeners in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or vinyl. Environmental chemicals such as phenols, phthalates, and dioxin-like compounds are endocrine disruptors that show estrogen-like activity and may alter normal brain development (Tanida et al. 2009).

Although there are many data on the effects of these chemicals on animals (Shea 2003), there is little convincing evidence of adverse effects in humans (Duty et al. 2005; Hauser et al. 2006; Kamrin 2009); however, there are some reports on the effects of phthalates on children’s health (Sathyanarayana 2008), including the development of the reproductive system (Lottrup et al. 2006), reduced birth weight (Wolff et al. 2008), and positive associations with allergy and asthma (Bornehag et al. 2004; Kolarik et al. 2008).

There is also growing concern about the adverse effects of phthalates on neurodevelopment. In recent years, there has been a growing concern about mental conditions, ranging from cognitive impairment to schizophrenia, that have been linked to endocrine disruption (Brown 2009). Experimental studies suggest that higher levels of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) may have adverse effects on neurobehavioral parameters in mice (Tanaka 2002, 2005). Environmental exposure to phthalates in humans may contribute to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Few studies have reported an association between prenatal phthalate exposure and neurologic effects in humans. Recently, Engel et al. (2009) reported variable associations between individual phthalate metabolites or their molar sums and many developmental scores; the researchers also found a significant interaction between phthalate metabolites and gender.

An analysis of our preliminary 2007 survey data on school-age children revealed that environmental levels of lead and manganese may have a negative synergistic effect on the intelligence of school-age children (Kim et al. 2009b). We also observed a positive association between phthalate metabolites in urine and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Kim et al. 2009a), but we were unable to reach a definite conclusion on the association between phthalate and the cognitive functioning of the subjects. This may have been due to the limitations of our 2007 survey; the sample size was small, and we had no information regarding the intelligence quotient (IQ) of the subjects’ mothers. Therefore, we conducted the present cross-sectional survey with larger sample and interviewed both children and their mothers.

No report has examined the relationship between phthalate exposure and children’s IQ. We hypothesized that phthalate metabolites in urine might be related to children’s IQ independent of maternal IQ.

Materials and Methods

Study protocol and recruitment

This study was conducted between April and October of 2008. In a second-year study named The Effects of Pollution on Neurobehavioral Development and Future Policies to Protect Our Children, funded by the Eco-Technopia 21 project, we assessed lead, mercury, and manganese in blood as well as cotinine and phthalate metabolites in urine (Cho et al. 2010). We assessed the children’s neurocognitive functioning, including general intelligence, attention, and concentration. We interviewed the children’s mothers to evaluate maternal IQ and child developmental state as well as to screen for the presence of several psychiatric disorders. Questionnaires were also given to parents asking for information about environmental surroundings, such as the type of housing, number of rooms in the house, pesticide and organophosphate exposure, distance from the road, proximity to industry, presence of incineration plants in the neighborhood, quality of air, pets, exposure to indirect smoking, and diet.

The Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital approved the study protocol. Participants were recruited from Seoul (metropolitan area, 605.3 km2; population, 11,000,000) Seongnam (suburban area, 141.8 km2; population, 971,150), Incheon (industrial area, 1002.07 km2; population, 2,758,431), Ulsan (industrial area, 1,057 km2; population, 1,129,827), and Yeoncheon (rural area, 695.3 km2, population, 44,974). From each area, we chose one to three schools (total of nine) that best represented the local environment. An invitation to participate in the study was sent to third- and fourth-grade children and their parents. After being given a detailed explanation, 667 children/parents of 1,000 gave informed consent to participate in the study (participation rate, 66.7%). Among fourth- through sixth-grade elementary school students in participating schools, the sex ratio and the mean age of the children were not different between participants and nonparticipants.

Measuring children’s cognitive functioning

The children were individually administered the abbreviated form of the Korean Educational Development Institute–Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (KEDI-WISC) (Park et al. 1996), which consists of the following scales: vocabulary, arithmetic, picture arrangement, and block design tests. This form of the KEDI-WISC has been validated with Korean children and is used to determe global estimates of intellectual functioning. Kim and Kim (1986) have reported that the correlations between this abbreviated form and the original one ranged from 0.89 to 0.92 on the four sub-scales; the correlations between the two forms for the verbal, performance, and Full Scale IQs (FSIQs) were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively. Scores obtained on an abbreviated battery are highly correlated with the WISC FSIQ scores (Kaufman 1976). The KEDI-WISC is useful in determining children’s IQ, as discussed previously (Kim et al. 2009b). The sums of the age-adjusted t-scores for arithmetic and vocabulary were used to estimate Verbal IQ (VIQ), and the sums of scores for block design and picture arrangement were used to estimate Performance IQ (PIQ).

For the testing, 23 examiners were trained for 8 hr by a licensed clinical psychologist with 20 years of experience in the field (M.-S.S.). Additionally, examiners had a 2-hr meeting before the beginning of the session to verify testing skills. Research nurses supervised the tests in every school at each site. All of the raw data were reviewed by the research nurse and a child psychiatrist (H.-W.K.) to confirm the IQ scores of each subject.

Measuring maternal cognitive function

Examiners, unaware of the children’s IQ levels, administered the short form of the Korean Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (K-WAIS) (Lim et al. 2000) to the children’s mothers. This test consists of vocabulary, arithmetic, picture arrangement, and block design tests. Scores obtained on abbreviated batteries have been found to be highly correlated with FSIQ scores (Silverstein 1990). The sum of the age-adjusted t-scores for arithmetic and vocabulary was used to estimate VIQ, and the scores for block design and picture arrangement were used to estimate PIQ.

Determining phthalate metabolites in urine

The metabolites measured in this study included one primary metabolite of dibutyl phthalate, mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), and two secondary metabolites of DEHP, mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl)phthalate (MEOHP).

We collected urine using a paper cup from each child between 0900 and 1100 hours at the school. Immediately after collection, we placed the urine in containers (high-clarity polypropylene Falcon tubes) and stored them at −20°C until the samples were analyzed. Field blanks consisted of purified water. Later, the samples were brought to room temperature and vortexed after thawing. Next, 500 μL urine was buffered with 30 μL 2.0 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and spiked with a mixture of isotope phthalate monoester standards (100 ng/mL) and 10 μL β-glucuronidase. The sample was incubated at 37°C for 3 hr to deconjugate the glucuronidated phthalate metabolites. After incubation, 100 μL 2N HCl was added to collect the phthalate monoester. The extract was dried with nitrogen gas and reconstituted with 1 mL HPLC-grade H2O in a 2-mL glass vial. One blank and one quality-control (QC) sample were included in each batch of samples. The QC sample was spiked with pooled urine and a mixture of phthalate monoester standard (100 ng/mL). The supernatants were purified using solid-phase extraction with disposable Agilent SB C18 1.8 μm (2.1 × 50 mm) columns (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The mobile phase was 0.1% acetic acid water:0.01% acetic acid acetonitrile (90:10, vol/vol) at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min, and the eluates were monitored at target masses of 221, 293, and 291, and internal standard (ISTD) masses of 225, 297, and 295. The monoester phthalates were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (Agilent 6410 triple Quad LCMS; Agilent) (Kho et al. 2008). The method detection limit of phthalate metabolites was 0.016, 0.045, and 0.440 μg/L for MEHP, MEOHP, and MBP, respectively. We added each value (micrograms per liter) for summing two secondary metabolites of DEHP, MEHP and MEOHP. We used a calibration curve (R2 > 0.995) for QC in every batch following the QC protocol of the mass spectrometry.

For creatinine measurement, CREA (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) reagent was used with a Hitachi 7600 machine (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with a kinetic colormetric assay (rate-blanked and compensated). We used value (micrograms per liter)/creatinine (grams per liter) for dilution correction in the analyses.

Statistical analyses

We used Student t-tests or analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for testing continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. The associations between urine phthalate (MEOHP, MEHP, and MBP) concentration and WISC IQ scores were assessed using linear regression analysis. Because the distribution of the metabolite was skewed in the sample, we used log-transformed values (ln) in the analyses.

Using the significant variables from the above analysis, we built multiple regression models. In the regression analyses, the IQ score was the primary dependent variable, and concurrently measured urine phthalate concentrations were the primary independent variables. Regression analyses were performed using a set of covariates based on established predictors of children’s cognitive functioning. Models were adjusted for developmental, socioeconomic, and familial influences on IQ variables such as age, sex, birth weight, history of breast-feeding, residential area, socioeconomic status (SES), and paternal educational level. Because maternal IQ might serve as an indicator of the quality of the home environment and stimulation in the home, we present models with and without the maternal IQ.

Because endocrine disruptors are known to affect the sexes differently, we divided the participants into two groups by sex and explored the relationship between IQ score and urine metabolites (quartile) using ANOVA.

Sex, SES (yearly income separated into above and below average), history of breast-feeding (yes or no), paternal education (above and below high school), indirect smoking (yes or no), smoking during pregnancy (yes or no), and the five residential areas were categorical variables. All analyses were considered to be statistically significant for p-values < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).


Participant characteristics

The geographic distribution of the study participants was as follows: Seoul, n = 279 (41.8%); Seongnam, n = 73 (10.9%); Incheon, n = 126 (18.9%); Ulsan, n = 113 (16.9%); and Yeoncheon, n = 76 (11.4%). The number of children recruited from each city differed significantly [χ2 = 214.5; degrees of freedom (df) = 4; p < 0.001]. Of the 667 subjects, sufficient urine amounts to measure phthalates were available for 658 (98.7%). We excluded an additional 34 participants from the analyses because of low birth weight (< 2.5 kg, n = 31), a history of neonatal hypoxia (n = 1), and the presence of a seizure disorder (n = 2).

The mean (± SD) age of the participants was 9.05 ± 0.72 years (range, 8–11), and 48.4% were female. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the subjects. We found significant differences in the background characteristics between the children included (n = 621) and excluded (n = 46) from the analyses with respect to age, gestational age at birth, and birth weight. All other variables were comparable between included and excluded children.

Table 1
Demographic characteristics of the subjects.

The mean (± SD) full-scale KEDI-WISC for the total sample was 110.7 ± 15.0 (range, 49–152), the mean VIQ was 23.2 ± 5.5 (range, 6–36), and the mean PIQ was 23.5 ± 5.3 (range, 3–37). We found no significant interobserver variability in the children’s mean IQ scores. The girls performed worse than the boys on the FSIQ [mean difference = 2.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4–5.1; p = 0.02] and VIQ measures (mean difference = 1.3; 95% CI, 0.4–2.1; p = 0.004).

We obtained significant correlations between children’s IQ and both birth weight and maternal IQ (respectively, r = 0.12, p = 0.005; and r = 0.39, p < 0.001). We found significant relations between child FSIQ and educational level of the father (more than high school, 112.1 ± 14.8; less than high school, 102.7 ± 15.4; p = 0.004), sex (boys, 112.0 ± 14.7; girls, 109.3 ± 15.2; p = 0.02), SES (above average, 113.0 ± 15.0; below average, 108.7 ± 14.6; p = 0.01), and history of breast-feeding (breast-feeding, 113.0 ± 14.1; not breast-feeding, 108.8 ± 16.1; p = 0.01) by t-test. FSIQ was different from the residential area (Seoul, 114.6 ± 13.5; Sungnam, 106.1 ± 12.3; Incheon, 106.1 ± 14.7; Ulsan, 112.1 ± 16.1; Yeonchun, 106.0 ± 16.8; p < 0.001) by ANOVA. Thus, we used these as covariates in multivariate analysis.

All of the urinary phthalate biomarkers exceeded the limits of detection (Table 2). The geometric mean (ln) concentrations of MEHP, MEOHP, and MBP were 21.3 μg/L [geometric SD (GSD) = 2.2; range, 0.5–445.4], 18.0 μg/L (GSD = 2.4; range, 0.07–291.1), and 48.9 μg/L (GSD = 2.2; range, 2.1–1645.5), respectively. The mean (± SD) concentration of urine creatinine was 1.14 ± 0.51; range, 0.05–2.83) g/L.

Table 2
Urinary phthalate biomarkers among the participants.

The relationship between phthalate metabolites and IQ

We used linear regression analysis to determine the relationship between phthalate metabolites and IQ score. Additionally, we attempted to control for the possible effects of dilution (Engel et al. 2009). First, we used creatinine-corrected concentrations. Next, we analyzed the data twice including or excluding the observations with urinary creatinine values > 0.2 g/L to eliminate data from extremely dilute urine samples (n = 11). Because the results of these two analyses did not differ, we have reported the results from all observations (n = 621). Because urine phthalates were not distributed normally, we used natural log-transformed values in analyses.

We first analyzed the influence on each measure of children’s IQ to choose which covariates to include in our multiple regression models (Table 3). We calculated the sum of MEHP and MEOHP because both are metabolites of DEHP. MEHP, MEOHP, and the sum of DEHP metabolites were significantly related to FSIQ, VIQ, and the vocabulary and block design scores; MBP was significantly related to the vocabulary and block design scores.

Table 3
Univariate analysis of log-e creatinine-adjusted urinary concentrations of phthalate biomarkers with IQ tests.

For FSIQ, VIQ, and the vocabulary and block design scores, we used multiple linear regression analysis with covariates to control for confounding effects (Table 4). We used log-e values in analyses. Models are adjusted for developmental, socioeconomic, and familial influences on IQ variables. We present the two models, without maternal IQ (model 1) or with maternal IQ (model 2) as a covariate. In model 1, the results were similar to those from univariate analyses, except for an insignificant relationship between block design and MBP. Finally, we added maternal IQ as a covariate. The relations between MEHP, MEOHP, and the sum of DEHP metabolites to the vocabulary subscore were still significant (p < 0.001). Therefore, a one-level change in the ln MEHP, MEOHP, or sum of DEHP metabolites altered the vocabulary subscore by −0.501, −0.444, and −0.529, respectively, independently of all of the covariates, including maternal IQ.

Table 4
Multiple regression analysis of the relationship of phthalates with IQ adjusted for influences of covariates.

Because endocrine disruptors are known to affect the sexes differently, we plotted the vocabulary scores by sex (Figure 1). In boys, vocabulary scores were 1.69 score lower (95% CI, 0.5–2.9) and 1.85 score lower (95% CI, 0.66–3.0) in the fourth quartile of ln creatinine-adjusted MEHP (highest) compared with the second and third quartiles (adjusted means: fourth quartile, 11.9; 95% CI, 11.1–12.8; second quartile, 13.6; 95% CI, 12.8–14.4; third quartile, 13.8; 95% CI, 12.9–14.6) by ANOVA (p = 0.01). Also, in boys, vocabulary scores were 1.36 score lower (95% CI, 0.20–2.51) and 2.08 score lower (95% CI, 0.90–3.26) in the fourth quartile of ln creatinine-adjusted DEHP metabolites (highest) compared with the second and third quartiles (adjusted means: fourth quartile, 12.0; 95% CI, 11.2–12.9; second quartile, 13.4; 95% CI, 12.6–14.2; third quartile, 14.1; 95% CI, 13.2–15.0) by ANOVA (p = 0.006). However, among girls, we found no significant association between these variables.

Figure 1
Adjusted mean WISC Vocabulary score estimated by MEHP (A) and DEHP metabolites (B) quartiles of ln creatinine (Cr)-corrected urine concentrations. Adjusted means differed significantly between the second and fourth quartiles and between the third and ...


In this study we investigated the relationship between environmental exposure to phthalates and children’s IQ scores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show a negative association between IQ and urine phthalates in humans. A child’s IQ can be influenced by genetic, familial, educational, and social factors (Bellinger 2000, 2004, 2008). These factors might confound any observed association between the exposure of interest and the outcome (Mink et al. 2004; Sattler 2001). Therefore, we tried to determine whether phthalates were inversely associated with children’s cognition independent of potential confounders. Before we adjusted for maternal IQ, we found inverse relationships between MEHP, MEOHP, and the sum of secondary metabolites for DEHP and the children’s FSIQ, VIQ, and vocabulary and block design scores. MBP was also negatively associated with vocabulary score. Maternal IQ is a well-known confounder of children’s IQ (Mink et al. 2004; Sattler 2001); however, adjusting for a confounder that has a stronger effect than the variable of interest can lead to underestimations in the true effect of this variable (in this case, metabolite levels) (Bellinger 2008).

In this study, controlling for maternal IQ had a large impact on the effect size of the association between phthalates and IQ. It might work as a confounder if maternal IQ and the level of phthalates in children are related to each other. Maternal IQ might have influenced the children’s environmental exposure to these substances, which would be reflected by the level of phthalate metabolites. At the same time, maternal IQ affects child IQ and therefore affects the relationship between child IQ and phthalate level, although after adjusting for maternal IQ, MEHP, MEOHP, and the sum of secondary metabolites of DEHP showed inverse relationships with children’s vocabulary scores in this study. However, because there could be a residual confounding of maternal IQ, we cannot say that this study provides evidence of a definitive relationship of phthalates with children’s IQ independent of maternal IQ.

Children are of special concern in terms of phthalate exposure because of their neurodevelopmental state. Exposure to neurotoxic agents is more detrimental to children because of critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system (Rice and Barone 2000). Neurotoxic agents could disrupt the temporal and regional emergence of critical developmental processes even after birth (i.e., synapse formation and myelination).

There are some limitations of this study. First, although at least 16 phthalate metabolites in urine can be measured (Kato et al. 2005), we measured only three, based on children’s likely exposure, availability of standard samples, and technical experience of the analyses. Second, using a single measurement might not have the same implications as examining the level and severity of chronic exposure. Phthalates are rapidly metabolized and excreted, and a single spot-urine measurement may not reflect long-term exposure; however, several studies have reported low to moderate consistency of phthalate measurements over time (Fromme et al. 2007; Hauser et al. 2004; Hoppin et al. 2002). When sources or exposure patterns are consistent, we can assume that a single measurement reflects a typical measurement. Even so, we have to be careful when expanding our results to other phthalates because the vulnerability of the developing brain to chemicals reportedly depends on the duration of exposure (Tanida et al. 2009). Our cross-sectional design cannot rule out the possibility of misclassification between exposure and outcome, so further research using prospective designs is needed; however, even in a prospective study, maternal IQ could still contribute to a child’s exposure opportunities such that an observed association would not be unequivocally causal.

Third, we did not evaluate maternal levels of exposure. To our knowledge, there is no report presenting phthalate exposure data from both children and their mothers. If we were to measure the exposure of the family simultaneously, then we could clarify the effect of the coexposure from other confounding factors as well. Fourth, because maternal IQ had a large effect size on the associations, the quality of the home environment and stimulation provided in the home could be potential confounders. One of the limitations of our study is that we did not gather systemic measures (e.g., the Caldwell Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment inventory) (Zevalkink et al. 2008) of these additional potential confounders.

The mechanism that might cause negative effects of phthalates on neural development is uncertain (Engel et al. 2009). MEHP activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) via the activation of nuclear receptors (Roberts et al. 1997). Ligands of PPAR play roles in lipid metabolism, cellular proliferation, and the inflammatory response and are widely expressed in inflammatory, dendritic, and endothelial cells (Kota et al. 2005). Its signal transduction pathway has recently been implicated in the progression of neuro-degenerative and psychiatric diseases and its relation to cognitive function (van Neerven et al. 2008). The activation of PPARα by phthalate monoesters induces rodent hepato-carcinogenesis (Hays et al. 2005; Peters et al. 1997). PPARs have been observed in developing neural tubes (Braissant and Wahli 1998) and may alter lipid metabolism in the brain (Xu et al. 2007). Furthermore, phthalates are suspected of interfering with the thyroid hormone system (Ghisari and Bonefeld-Jorgensen 2009). Although human data are lacking, in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that phthalate exposure is associated with altered thyroid functioning (Breous et al. 2005; Hinton et al. 1986; Pereira et al. 2007; Wenzel et al. 2005). Phthalate exposure may be associated with altered thyroid activity in adult men (Meeker et al. 2007) and in pregnant women (Huang et al. 2007). Just as neonatal hypothyroidism affects cognition, subclinical hypothyroidism can affect children’s cognition (Baldini et al. 1997; Monzani et al. 1993; Zhu et al. 2006).

Cognitive functioning is related to the regulation of the neurotransmitter system. Genetic variation in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene at several loci affects normal cognitive functioning in children (Barnett et al. 2009). Several animal studies have revealed that the dopamine system in the central nervous system is affected by phthalates. Low-dose phthalates can cause the loss of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, decrease tyrosine hydroxylase–biosynthetic activity (Tanida et al. 2009), and impair tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity (Ishido et al. 2004).

We assumed that potential effects of phthalates on cognitive functioning would differ by sex because phthalates are well-known endocrine disruptors with estrogen-like effects (Kamrin 2009; Shea 2003). Relatively low doses of DEHP resulted in different dose–response curves by sex in an animal study (Andrade et al. 2006). Boys and girls may demonstrate opposite patterns of association between phthalate level and performance with improved motor performance with increasing concentrations of phthalate metabolites among boys in human subjects (Engel et al. 2009). We found a different pattern for the association of phthalates with vocabulary scores by sex, which concurs with previous studies of different results according to sex (Hatch et al. 2008; Wolff et al. 2008).

Children can be exposed to phthalates via ingestion, inhalation, and absorption through normal skin (Janjua et al. 2007) as well as via exposure to medical devices contaminated with phthalates (Breous et al. 2005). In our study, after controlling for maternal IQ and other covariates, the results show an inverse relationship between phthalate metabolites and IQ scores; however, given the limitations inherent in cross-sectional epidemiology, prospective studies are needed to fully explore these associations.


This work was funded by the Eco-Technopia 21 project of Korea Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (091-081-059).

S.-C.C. receives research funding from Janssen, Eli-Lilly, and Otsuka and is supported by the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (A080651 and A080054). The remaining authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.


  • Andrade AJ, Grande SW, Talsness CE, Grote K, Chahoud I. A dose-response study following in utero and lactational exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP): non-monotonic dose-response and low dose effects on rat brain aromatase activity. Toxicology. 2006;227:185–192. [PubMed]
  • Baldini IM, Vita A, Mauri MC, Amodei V, Carrisi M, Bravin S, et al. Psychopathological and cognitive features in subclinical hypothyroidism. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1997;21:925–935. [PubMed]
  • Barnett JH, Heron J, Goldman D, Jones PB, Xu K. Effects of catechol-O-methyltransferase on normal variation in the cognitive function of children. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:909–916. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bellinger DC. Effect modification in epidemiologic studies of low-level neurotoxicant exposures and health outcomes. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2000;22:133–140. [PubMed]
  • Bellinger DC. Assessing environmental neurotoxicant exposures and child neurobehavior: confounded by confounding? Epidemiology. 2004;15:383–384. [PubMed]
  • Bellinger DC. Lead neurotoxicity and socioeconomic status: conceptual and analytical issues. Neurotoxicology. 2008;29:828–832. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bornehag CG, Sundell J, Weschler CJ, Sigsgaard T, Lundgren B, Hasselgren M, et al. The association between asthma and allergic symptoms in children and phthalates in house dust: a nested case–control study. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1393–1397. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Braissant O, Wahli W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha, -beta, and -gamma during rat embryonic development. Endocrinology. 1998;139:2748–2754. [PubMed]
  • Breous E, Wenzel A, Loos U. The promoter of the human sodium/iodide symporter responds to certain phthalate plasticisers. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;244:75–78. [PubMed]
  • Brown JS., Jr Effects of bisphenol-A and other endocrine disruptors compared with abnormalities of schizophrenia: an endocrine-disruption theory of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:256–278. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Cho SC, Kim BN, Hong YC, Shin MS, Yoo HJ, Kim JW, et al. Effect of environmental exposure to lead and tobacco smoke on inattentive and hyperactive symptoms and neurocognitive performance in children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02250.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Duty SM, Calafat AM, Silva MJ, Ryan L, Hauser R. Phthalate exposure and reproductive hormones in adult men. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:604–610. [PubMed]
  • Engel SM, Zhu C, Berkowitz GS, Calafat AM, Silva MJ, Miodovnik A, et al. Prenatal phthalate exposure and performance on the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale in a multiethnic birth cohort. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30:522–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fromme H, Bolte G, Koch HM, Angerer J, Boehmer S, Drexler H, et al. Occurrence and daily variation of phthalate metabolites in the urine of an adult population. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007;210:21–33. [PubMed]
  • Ghisari M, Bonefeld-Jorgensen EC. Effects of plasticizers and their mixtures on estrogen receptor and thyroid hormone functions. Toxicol Lett. 2009;189:67–77. [PubMed]
  • Hatch EE, Nelson JW, Qureshi MM, Weinberg J, Moore LL, Singer M, et al. Association of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations with body mass index and waist circumference: a cross-sectional study of NHANES data, 1999–2002. Environ Health. 2008;7:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-27. [Online 3 June 2008] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
  • Hauser R, Meeker JD, Duty S, Silva MJ, Calafat AM. Altered semen quality in relation to urinary concentrations of phthalate monoester and oxidative metabolites. Epidemiology. 2006;17:682–691. [PubMed]
  • Hauser R, Meeker JD, Park S, Silva MJ, Calafat AM. Temporal variability of urinary phthalate metabolite levels in men of reproductive age. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1734–1740. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hays T, Rusyn I, Burns AM, Kennett MJ, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ, et al. Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha) in bezafibrate-induced hepatocarcinogenesis and cholestasis. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26:219–227. [PubMed]
  • Hinton RH, Mitchell FE, Mann A, Chescoe D, Price SC, Nunn A, et al. Effects of phthalic acid esters on the liver and thyroid. Environ Health Perspect. 1986;70:195–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hoppin JA, Brock JW, Davis BJ, Baird DD. Reproducibility of urinary phthalate metabolites in first morning urine samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:515–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Huang PC, Kuo PL, Guo YL, Liao PC, Lee CC. Associations between urinary phthalate monoesters and thyroid hormones in pregnant women. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2715–2722. [PubMed]
  • Ishido M, Masuo Y, Sayato-Suzuki J, Oka S, Niki E, Morita M. Dicyclohexylphthalate causes hyperactivity in the rat concomitantly with impairment of tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity. J Neurochem. 2004;91:69–76. [PubMed]
  • Janjua NR, Mortensen GK, Andersson AM, Kongshoj B, Skakkebaek NE, Wulf HC. Systemic uptake of diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, and butyl paraben following whole-body topical application and reproductive and thyroid hormone levels in humans. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:5564–5570. [PubMed]
  • Kamrin MA. Phthalate risks, phthalate regulation, and public health: a review. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2009;12:157–174. [PubMed]
  • Kato K, Silva MJ, Needham LL, Calafat AM. Determination of 16 phthalate metabolites in urine using automated sample preparation and on-line preconcentration/high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2005;77:2985–2991. [PubMed]
  • Kaufman AS. A four test short form of the WISC-R. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1976;1:180–196.
  • Kho YL, Jeong JY, Choi KH, Kim PG. Determination of phthalate metabolites in Korean children’s urine by high performance liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. J Environ Health Sci. 2008;34:271–278.
  • Kim BN, Cho SC, Kim Y, Shin MS, Yoo HJ, Kim JW, et al. Phthalates exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-age children. Biol Psychiatry. 2009a;66:958–963. [PubMed]
  • Kim MK, Kim ZS. A study on the abbreviated form of the K-WISC. Seoul J Psychiatr. 1986;11:194–201.
  • Kim Y, Kim BN, Hong YC, Shin MS, Yoo HJ, Kim JW, et al. Co-exposure to environmental lead and manganese affects the intelligence of school-aged children. Neurotoxicology. 2009b;30:564–571. [PubMed]
  • Kolarik B, Naydenov K, Larsson M, Bornehag CG, Sundell J. The association between phthalates in dust and allergic diseases among Bulgarian children. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:98–103. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kota BP, Huang TH, Roufogalis BD. An overview on biological mechanisms of PPARs. Pharmacol Res. 2005;51:85–94. [PubMed]
  • Lim YR, Lee WK, Lee WH, Park JW. The study on the accuracy and validity of Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale short forms: a comparison of the WARD7 subtest vs Doppelt subtest. Kor J Clin Psychol. 2000;19:563–574.
  • Lottrup G, Andersson AM, Leffers H, Mortensen GK, Toppari J, Skakkebaek NE, et al. Possible impact of phthalates on infant reproductive health. Int J Androl. 2006;29:172–180. [PubMed]
  • Meeker JD, Calafat AM, Hauser R. Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites may alter thyroid hormone levels in men. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:1029–1034. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mink PJ, Goodman M, Barraj LM, Imrey H, Kelsh MA, Yager J. Evaluation of uncontrolled confounding in studies of environmental exposures and neurobehavioral testing in children. Epidemiology. 2004;15:385–393. [PubMed]
  • Monzani F, Del Guerra P, Caraccio N, Pruneti CA, Pucci E, Luisi M, et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism: neurobehavioral features and beneficial effect of L-thyroxine treatment. Clin Investig. 1993;71:367–371. [PubMed]
  • Park KS, Yoon JY, Park HJ, Park HJ, Kwon KU. Development of KEDI-WISC, Individual Intelligence Test for Korean Children. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute; 1996.
  • Pereira C, Mapuskar K, Vaman Rao C. A two-generation chronic mixture toxicity study of Clophen A60 and diethyl phthalate on histology of adrenal cortex and thyroid of rats. Acta Histochem. 2007;109:29–36. [PubMed]
  • Peters JM, Cattley RC, Gonzalez FJ. Role of PPAR alpha in the mechanism of action of the nongenotoxic carcinogen and peroxisome proliferator Wy-14,643. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:2029–2033. [PubMed]
  • Rice D, Barone S., Jr Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(suppl 3):511–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Roberts RA, Nebert DW, Hickman JA, Richburg JH, Goldsworthy TL. Perturbation of the mitosis/apoptosis balance: a fundamental mechanism in toxicology. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997;38:107–115. [PubMed]
  • Sathyanarayana S. Phthalate and children’s health. Curr Probl Adolesc Health Care. 2008;38:34–49. [PubMed]
  • Sattler JM. Assessment of Children: Cognitive Applications. 4th ed. La Mesa. CA: Jerome Sattler Publisher; 2001.
  • Shea KM. Pediatric exposure and potential toxicity of phthalate plasticizers. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1467–1474. [PubMed]
  • Silverstein AB. Critique of a Doppelt-type short form of the WAIS-R. J Clin Psychol. 1990;46:333–339. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka T. Reproductive and neurobehavioural toxicity study of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) administered to mice in the diet. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002;40:1499–1506. [PubMed]
  • Tanaka T. Reproductive and neurobehavioural effects of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in a cross-mating toxicity study of mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005;43:581–589. [PubMed]
  • Tanida T, Warita K, Ishihara K, Fukui S, Mitsuhashi T, Sugawara T, et al. Fetal and neonatal exposure to three typical environmental chemicals with different mechanisms of action: mixed exposure to phenol, phthalate, and dioxin cancels the effects of sole exposure on mouse midbrain dopaminergic nuclei. Toxicol Lett. 2009;189:40–47. [PubMed]
  • van Neerven S, Kampmann E, Mey J. RAR/RXR and PPAR/RXR signaling in neurological and psychiatric diseases. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;85:433–451. [PubMed]
  • Wenzel A, Franz C, Breous E, Loos U. Modulation of iodide uptake by dialkyl phthalate plasticisers in FRTL-5 rat thyroid follicular cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;244:63–71. [PubMed]
  • Wolff MS, Engel SM, Berkowitz GS, Ye X, Silva MJ, Zhu C, et al. Prenatal phenol and phthalate exposures and birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1092–1097. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Xu Y, Agrawal S, Cook TJ, Knipp GT. Di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate affects lipid profiling in fetal rat brain upon maternal exposure. Arch Toxicol. 2007;81:57–62. [PubMed]
  • Zevalkink J, Riksen-Walraven JM, Bradley RH. The quality of children’s home environment and attachment security in Indonesia. J Genet Psychol. 2008;169:72–91. [PubMed]
  • Zhu DF, Wang ZX, Zhang DR, Pan ZL, He S, Hu XP, et al. fMRI revealed neural substrate for reversible working memory dysfunction in subclinical hypothyroidism. Brain. 2006;129:2923–2930. [PubMed]

Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Science