|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Abnormal expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene is a key pathogenic factor for Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL). To study the role of ALK, an inducible shRNA system was stably introduced into cultured human ALCL cells. Inducing shRNA expression in the generated cells resulted in cellular ALK gene silencing and led to inactivation of multiple signaling pathways and growth arrest. Interestingly, a combination of ALK gene silencing with U0126, a kinase inhibitor specific for the ERK1/2 pathway, resulted in an augmented reduction in cellular JunB expression. Functional studies indicated that combining ALK gene silencing with U0126 treatment provided a synergistic growth inhibition, which occurred faster and was more profound than with either treatment alone. This synergistic effect was also observed when measuring cell proliferation, apoptosis, and in vitro cell colony formation. Importantly, the combination of ALK gene silencing and U0126 had a prolonged inhibitory effect, preventing recovery of ALCL cell growth even after treatments were removed. Moreover, this synergistic inhibitory effect was confirmed in vivo using a mouse model with xenografted ALCL tumors. Our findings indicate that combining cellular ALK gene silencing with a low dose of U0126 may prove to be an effective and more specific therapeutic approach to treating ALCL.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) is an aggressive T-cell lymphoma that carries a chromosomal translocation involving the ALK gene (Stein et al., 2000; Delsol et al., 2008). The most common chromosomal aberration is the translocation t(2;5)(p23;q35), occurring in nearly 75% of cases, which results in abnormal expression of a chimeric fusion protein, nucleophosmin (NPM)-ALK (Morris et al., 1994 and 1997; Duyster et al., 2001). Auto-phosphorylation and subsequent activation of ALK in the fusion proteins has been demonstrated to be lymphomagenic both in vitro and in vivo (Fujimoto et al., 1996; Kuefer et al., 1997; Chiarle et al., 2003; Amin and Lai, 2007). Currently, a multi-drug chemotherapy approach is the mainstream treatment for ALCL (Shulman et al., 1993; Reiter et al., 1994). However, the chemotherapy used is neither cell- nor gene-specific. The presence of a unique molecular pathogenesis (abnormal ALK expression) in ALCL provides a molecular basis to develop more specific therapeutic approaches. RNA interference, the process by which specific mRNAs are targeted for degradation by complementary small interfering RNA (siRNA), enables one to silence a single gene at the cellular level (Hannon, 2002; Zamore, 2002; ). Recent studies have shown that transient transfection of cells with synthetic siRNAs could ablate cellular ALK gene expression, cause cell growth inhibition, and augment the anticancer effects of chemotherapy in vitro, suggesting that the ALK gene is a potential target for specific treatment of ALCL (Ritter et al., 2003; Piva et al., 2006; Hsu et al., 2007).
As cellular ALK fusion proteins have a relative long half-life (at least 48 hours), repeated transfection/introduction of siRNA into cells was necessary for successful gene silencing (Ritter et al., 2003). However, repeated transfection or use of a high dose of siRNA led to pronounced levels of cytotoxicity with a subsequent reduction in cell viability (Hsu et al., 2007). An additional challenge is that the transfection/introduction rate of siRNAs into ALCL cells frequently varies in efficiency from 15% to 70% (Piva et al., 2006). Together, these issues highlight the difficulty in validating functional changes that result from ALK gene silencing, versus those induced by cell manipulations including serum starvation, transfection reagents, medium changes, temperature alteration, and cell sorting through a laser beam. To overcome this obstacle and perform reproducible studies, an assay system in which the cellular ALK gene can be silenced in a stable and inducible manner is indispensable. In this study, we established a stable cell model by introducing a tetracycline-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-expressing system into cultured human ALCL cells. Moreover, we go on to use this stable cell model to demonstrate that synergistic inhibition of ALCL cell growth could be achieved by combining ALK gene silencing with a low dose of the inhibitor U0126 specific for extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway (Favata et al., 1998).
To establish stably transfected cells with an inducible shRNA for ALK gene silencing, we utilized a human ALCL cell line (SUDHL-1) (Morgan et al., 1989). Two gene-expressing constructs were introduced in a stepwise fashion as illustrated in Figure 1A. The ‘conditioned cells’ were generated to constitutively express Tetracycline Repressor (TetR) by transfecting ALCL cells with purified Lentiviral particles containing the vector pLenti6/CMV/TetR/Blasticidin. After selection for the Blasticidin-resistant ‘conditioned cells’, protein expression of TetR was confirmed. A Western blot indicates the presence of a 24-kDa protein band consistent with TetR in ‘conditioned cells’ (Figure 1B), which is not present in the parental cells. The inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA) construct containing sequences that specifically target the C-terminal ALK portion of the NPM-ALK fusion gene were designed (shRNA-ALK), and the corresponding DNA inserts were synthesized as described in ‘Materials and Methods’. The synthesized dsDNAs encoding shRNA-ALK were cloned into a pLenti4/H1/TO/Zeocin vector and introduced into ‘conditioned cells’. To generate control cells, a non-related inducible shRNA for the Lamin gene (pLenti4/H1/TO/Zeocin/Lamin; Invitrogen) was used. Zeocin-resistant cells were examined for the presence of DNA inserts using PCR analysis of cellular DNA. As shown in the upper panel of Figure 1C, DNA inserts corresponding to shRNA-ALK (213-bp band in lane 5) and shRNA-Lamin (201-bp band in lane 6) were detected. No amplified DNA products were seen in the parental cells (lane 3) or in ‘conditioned cells’ (lane 4). The presence of the TetR gene in the same cells was confirmed by PCR with amplification of a 973-bp DNA product (lower panel of Figure 1C). TetR was detected in ‘conditioned cells’ (lane 4), as well as in the generated cells containing the shRNA-ALK construct (lane 5) or shRNA-Lamin construct (lane 6), but it was not present in the parental cells (lane 3).
To induce shRNA expression and silence the cellular ALK gene, the generated cells were treated with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) for 6 days. Western blot assays indicated that the protein expression of NPM-ALK was significantly reduced in tetracycline treated cells containing the inducible shRNA-ALK construct (Figure 1D, lanes 1 and 2), but was not altered in control cells carrying the inducible shRNA-Lamin construct (lanes 3 and 4).
To obtain optimal ALK gene silencing conditions, the cells were treated with different concentrations of tetracycline for 6 days. Western blot assays indicated that the level of ALK gene silencing was tetracycline dose-dependent and reached maximal inhibition in the presence of 5 µg/ml tetracycline (Figure 2A). No change in NPM-ALK protein expression was observed in the control cells containing the inducible shRNA-Lamin construct. To evaluate the corresponding cellular effects that resulted from ALK gene silencing, the treated cells were simultaneously stained with trypan blue and viable cells were counted. A tetracycline dose-dependent growth inhibition was observed in cells containing the inducible shRNA-ALK construct (Figure 2B, p < .01), which was not present in the control cells with inducible shRNA-Lamin. As NPM-ALK fusion proteins have a relative long half-life time of over 48 hours (Ritter et al., 2003), a time course of ALK gene silencing was performed by treating cells with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) for 8 days. Western blot assays demonstrated that cellular NPM-ALK protein levels were significantly decreased after 4 days of tetracycline treatment, and nearly abolished after 6 days (Figure 2C). In addition, simultaneous studies on cell growth were carried out by counting the number of viable cells present at each time-point. Significant inhibition in the number of viable cells was seen in cells containing the inducible shRNA-ALK construct after tetracycline treatment for 6 days (Figure 2D, p < .01), a timeline that closely matches the observed changes in cellular NPM-ALK protein expression. In contrast, tetracycline treatment had no effect on the growth rate of the control cells carrying inducible shRNA-Lamin.
To study the effect of ALK gene silencing on cell apoptosis, the generated cells were treated with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) for 4 days and stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V. Flow cytometry analysis illustrated that silencing of the ALK gene markedly stimulated cell apoptosis from a basal level of 4.7% (Figure 2E, open bar) to 10.4% (closed bar, p < .01). In contrast, no change in cell apoptosis was seen in control cells carrying inducible shRNA-Lamin. Taken together, our results confirm that NPM-ALK protein expression is indispensible for ALCL cell growth and survival, and the generated cells are a useful model for studying ALK gene silencing.
To study ALK-regulated cellular signaling pathways (Bai et al., 2000; Zamo et al., 2002; Chiarle et al., 2005; Amin et al., 2007; ), the generated cells were treated with tetracycline to induce gene silencing for 6 days as described above. Resultant changes in the activity of cellular ERK1/2, STAT3, and Akt were examined by Western blot using antibodies that recognize their phosphorylated/activated forms (p-ERK1/2, p-STAT3, and p-Akt). In addition, changes in protein expression levels of cellular JunB were studied. Simultaneously, the status of ALK gene silencing was followed by monitoring expression levels of NPM-ALK protein. As an internal control for the Western blot studies, equivalent protein loading β-actin was examined. Silencing of the ALK gene by shRNA induction with tetracycline resulted in a marked decrease of cellular p-ERK1/2, p-STAT3, p-Akt, and JunB (Figure 3A, lanes 1 and 2). In contrast, tetracycline treatment had no effect on control cells with inducible shRNA-Lamin (lanes 5, and 6). The abnormal expression of JunB protein mediated by CD30 activation in ALCL cells has been suggested to act via the ERK1/2 pathway (Watanabe et al., 2005). To block the ERK1/2 pathway, cells were exposed for 2 days to the kinase inhibitor U0126 which is specific for MEK1/2, an upstream kinase of ERK1/2 (Favata et al., 1998). As expected, exposure to U0126 (10 µM) completely inhibited ERK1/2 phosphorylation/activity and resulted in a significant decrease of JunB protein expression, while having no effect on p-STAT3, p-Akt, and NPM-ALK (lanes 3 and 7). Thus, silencing of the ALK gene or down-regulating the ERK1/2 pathway by U0126 resulted in a decrease of cellular JunB protein expression in ALCL cells. We then examined whether altering both signaling pathways (ALK and ERK1/2) would have synergistic effects. To this end, cells were treated with tetracycline for 6 days to induce ALK gene silence and were also exposed to U0126 during the last 2 days of tetracycline treatment. Changes in the activity of individual signaling pathways were examined as described above. Inhibition of both ALK gene expression (by the induced shRNA-ALK) and the ERK1/2 pathway (by addition of U0126) led to an augmented suppression of cellular JunB protein expression, but did not alter the level of p-STAT3 or p-Akt (lane 4). Furthermore, the enhanced inhibition on JunB protein expression was not seen in the control cells with inducible shRNA-Lamin (lanes 5–8). These findings suggest that although the activity of ERK1/2 pathway is partially dependent on ALK fusion protein expression in ALCL cells, it appears the ALK and ERK1/2 signaling pathways may cooperate, and independent inhibition of both pathways leads to synergistic effects on JunB protein expression.
Observation of the cooperative effect on cellular JunB expression suggested that the combination of treatments might also synergistically regulate other ALCL cell functions. To this end, the cells were treated with tetracycline to induce ALK gene silencing and were simultaneously exposed to increasing doses of U0126 (0.1–5 µM) for 6 days. Cell growth rates were then calculated by the ratio of viable cells in treated conditions versus viable cells in untreated controls. As shown in Figure 3B, silencing of the ALK gene alone with tetracycline treatment (solid bars) led to approximately a 31% reduction in cell growth (p < .01). Exposure of cells to low doses (≤ 0.5 µM) of U0126 alone (open bars) had no effect on cell growth, although the presence of 5 µM U0126 resulted in about 37% inhibition. A significantly enhanced inhibition of cell growth (~80% reduction) was achieved by combining ALK gene silencing with a low dose (0.5 µM) of U0126 (p < .01). In contrast, this synergistic inhibitory effect was not observed with the control cells carrying inducible shRNA-Lamin, although they did respond in a similar manner to a high dose of U0126 (5 µM) with an approximately 43% reduction observed in cell growth . To further dissect the observed synergistic effect, an extended time-course study (8 days) with 0.5 µM of U0126 was performed and resultant changes in cell growth rates were examined. Silencing of the ALK gene alone via tetracycline treatment resulted in cell growth inhibition, which was initially evident at day 4 [Figure 3C, Tet/(−)]. When the low dose of U0126 treatment was combined with ALK gene silencing a synergistic inhibition of cell growth was observed (Tet/U0126), with the effects occurring faster (evident at day 2 when used in combination vs. day 4 for ALK gene silencing alone) and being more pronounced (~80% suppression with the combination treatments vs. 30% with ALK gene silencing alone at day 6). It is notable that the presence of 0.5 µM of U0126 alone had no effect on cell growth [(−)/U0126], with growth rates being comparable to cells receiving no treatment(s) [(−)/(−)]. In addition, the control cells with inducible shRNA-Lamin had no change in their growth rate even though they underwent similar treatments.
To verify the observed synergistic effects on cell growth, we performed MTT cell proliferation assays. The cells were treated with tetracycline to induce ALK gene silencing and simultaneously were exposed to different doses of U0126 as indicated for 4 days (Figure 4). As was observed with viable cell counting experiments, the MTT assays showed silencing of the ALK gene alone caused a moderate decrease in cell proliferation [Figures 4A–D, Tet/(−), p < .01]. This ALK gene silencing-induced effect was significantly augmented by U0126 at a concentration as low as 0.5 µM (Tet/U0126, p < .01). It is important to note that at this low concentration, when used alone, U0126 had no effect on cell proliferation [(−)/U0126]. Moreover, although higher concentrations of U0126 (> 2 µM) suppressed cell proliferation, this effect could be further enhanced when combined with ALK gene silencing. In the control cells with inducible shRNA-Lamin, exposure to U0126 alone showed a similar effect on cell proliferation to the pattern seen with cells containing the inducible shRNA-ALK construct [Figures 4E–H, (−)/U0126]. However, the control cells showed no change in cell proliferation with tetracycline treatment alone [Tet/(−)], and no synergistic effect with tetracycline and U0126 (Tet/U0126). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that a combination of ALK gene silencing along with a low dose of U0126 can achieve a synergistic inhibition of ALCL cell growth/proliferation.
To determine if the observed changes in cell viability were due in part to an increase in apoptosis, the cells were treated with tetracycline to induce the ALK gene silencing alone or also received a low dose of U0126 (0.5 µM) for 4 days. Apoptotic cells were stained with Annexin-V and detected by flow cytometry. Silencing of the ALK gene alone induced about a 1-fold increase in the rate of cell apoptosis (Figure 5A, lighter gray bar). Although a low dose (0.5 µM) of U0126 alone had no effect on the cell apoptosis rate (darker gray bar), when used in combination with ALK gene silencing the cell apoptosis rate increased by 4-fold (solid bar, p < .01). In contrast, this marked increase in cell apoptosis rate was not observed in control cells carrying the inducible shRNA-Lamin construct undergoing the same treatment(s).
To evaluate the potential therapeutic value of the combination treatment, we examined the effects on in vitro cell colony formation. Cells were cultured in semi-solid methylcellulose medium containing tetracycline (3 µg/ml) to induce ALK gene silencing and/or 0.5 µM U0126 for 7 days. The formed cell colonies were then counted using light microscopy. As shown in Figure 5B, ALK gene silencing alone induced a moderate inhibition of cell colony formation (33% decrease; lighter gray bar). This ALK gene silencing-induced inhibition was significantly enhanced when combined with U0126 treatment (> 80% decrease; solid bar, p < .01). It should be noted that U0126 alone had only a mild inhibitory effect (darker gray bar). In the control cells carrying inducible shRNA-Lamin, no inhibition of cell colony formation was observed with tetracycline treatment alone, while a similar mild inhibitory effect was observed when U0126 was given. However, no synergistic inhibition was noted in the control cells receiving a combination of tetracycline treatment and U0126. In addition, we also examined the effects of the combination treatment on the size (diameter) of formed cell colonies using a microscope equipped with ruler lens. Neither treatment alone, tetracycline to induce ALK gene silencing nor 0.5 µM U0126 to inhibit the ERK1/2 pathway, had any effect on the size of cell colonies (Figure 5C, lighter and darker gray bars). However, when used together the combination treatment resulted in a significant inhibition in the size of formed cell colonies in cells containing inducible shRNA-ALK (solid bar, p < .05). In contrast, this synergistic effect was not seen in the control cells carrying an inducible shRNA-Lamin.
To evaluate potential post-treatment effects of the combination treatment, the cells were treated with tetracycline to induce gene silencing and/or 0.5 µM U0126 to inhibit cellular ERK1/2 pathway. As illustrated in Figure 6A, after 8, 10, or 12 days, the cells were washed with fresh medium to remove all treatment agents and an equal number of viable cells from each testing condition were cultured in the absence of treatment(s) for an additional 6 days. Although no significant effect on recovering cell growth was seen after an 8-day treatment course (Figure 6B), silencing of the ALK gene alone with tetracycline treatment for 10 days resulted in a significant inhibition in cell growth post-treatment [Figure 6C, Tet/(−), p < .01]. This inhibition was markedly augmented by the presence of U0126 (Tet/U0126, p < .01). Moreover, this augmented suppression on growth recovery was even more apparent after a 12-day course of the combination treatment with recovering cell growth post-treatment being nearly eliminated (Figure 6D, Tet/U0126, p < .01). In contrast, no change in cell growth post-treatment was detected in the control cells carrying an inducible shRNA-Lamin even after a 12-day course of the combination treatment (Figure 6E). These findings demonstrate that a minimum of a 10-day course with the combination treatment of ALK gene silencing and 0.5 µM U0126 is necessary to trigger prolonged post-treatment cell growth inhibition and a ≥12-day course of the combination treatment may prevent ALCL cell growth recovery post-treatment.
For in vivo studies, a mouse model with xenografted tumors was established by inoculating traceable ALCL cells containing shRNA-ALK subcutaneously in the right hind limb and control cells carrying shRNA-Lamin in the left hind limb of each mouse. After confirmation of tumor development, tumor-bearing mice were treated (n=5/condition) and resultant changes in tumor mass were monitored by whole body bioluminescence scanning to detect luciferase activity in traceable ALCL tumor cells (Figure S2). Inducing shRNA-ALK for specific gene silencing by feeding mice tetracycline resulted in a significant decrease in ALCL tumor growth [Figure 7A, Tet/(−), p < .05] and treatment with U0126 alone showed a minor effect on tumor growth [(−)/U0126]. Interestingly, the combined treatment with both ALK gene silencing and U0126 resulted in a synergistic inhibition of ALCL tumor growth (Tet/U0126, p < .05). In contrast, inducing shRNA-Lamin alone or in combination with U0126 treatment had no additional effect on control ALCL tumor growth (Figure 7B).
ALCL is currently treated with a multi-drug chemotherapy, with the most prevalent being the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) (Shulman et al., 1993; Reiter et al., 1994). However, CHOP chemotherapy is neither cell- nor gene-specific. In ALCL, the unique underlying pathogenesis of a chromosomal translocation of the ALK gene with subsequent abnormal expression of ALK fusion proteins provides a novel molecular target at which to direct specific therapeutics. Recent studies have shown that transient transfection of cells with synthetic siRNAs could ablate cellular ALK gene expression and led to cell growth inhibition, suggesting the ALK gene may indeed provide a potential target for specific treatment of ALCL. Since ALK fusion proteins have a relative long half-life (> 48 hours), it is difficult to reliably silence ALK gene expression through transient transfection (Ritter et al., 2003). Thus, we have established a stable ALCL cell line containing tetracycline inducible shRNA that can be used to silence the ALK gene at will (Figure 1). Using this cell model, we found that among multiple active signaling pathways in ALCL cells, the ERK1/2 and ALK pathways co-operate in regulating JunB protein expression (Figure 3A). To block the ERK1/2 pathway we used the kinase inhibitor U0126, which is specific for MEK1/2, an upstream kinase of ERK1/2. MEK1/2 inhibitors inhibit in vitro growth of leukemic cells (Milella et al., 2001), development of human tumors in mouse xenografts (Horiuchi et al., 2003; Dai et al., 2008; Wentz et al., 2008), and are being tested in clinical trials for a variety of malignancies (Rinehart et al., 2004; Lorusso et al., 2005; Adjei et al., 2008). Interestingly, exposure of cells to U0126 significantly enhanced ALK gene silencing-induced inhibition of ALCL cell growth even at concentrations that showed little to no effect when used alone (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The resultant synergistic inhibition of cell growth by the combination of ALK gene silencing with a low dose of U0126 treatment occurred faster and was more acute than that found with ALK gene silencing alone (Figure 3C). We also noted that if ALCL cells were exposed to the combination treatment for ≥10 days the cell growth post-treatment was significantly decreased and after a 12-day combination treatment course, cell growth post-treatment was almost completely inhibited (Figure 6). Our findings indicate that a combination of ALK gene silencing with a low dose of U0126 can not only inhibit ALCL cell growth, but may also be able prevent lymphoma recurrence post-treatment. In summary, this study provides solid evidence that a more sensitive and specific therapeutic approach for ALCL may be achieved by silencing the ALK gene with shRNA treatment in combination with a low dose of U0126 to block the ERK1/2 pathway. Finally, the generated tetracycline inducible shRNA-ALK SUDHL-1 cell line is a valuable tool for future studies directed towards understanding the role of ALK in ALCL as well as providing a useful model in which to test potential treatments.
In this study, a human ALCL cell line, SUDHL-1, was used in collaboration with Dr. Mark Raffeld at the National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH). The cell line carries chromosomal translocation t(2;5)(p23;q35) with resultant expression of NPM-ALK fusion protein (Morgan et al., 1989). Cells were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS, GIBCO, Rockville, MD). The kinase inhibitor U0126 was purchased from Tocris Cookson (Ellisrille, MO). Zeocin, Blasticidin, and tetracycline were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Briefly, the pBlock-It inducible H1 Lentiviral shRNA expressing system (Invitrogen) was utilized to stably introduce first a tetracycline repressor gene and then tetracycline responsive shRNA-ALK constructs into SUDHL-1 cells. Adding tetracycline into the media of the generated cells induced shRNA expression, which in turn specifically silenced the ALK gene (please see Supplemental Text for more detailed methods).
Mouse antibodies for human NPM/ALK fusion protein were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Rabbit antibodies for ERK1/2 protein, phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), STAT3, and Akt were obtained from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). TetR antibody was acquired from GeneTex (San Antonio, TX). JunB (sc-46) antibody was acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), and β-actin was acquired from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). For Western blotting, cells (5 × 106 cells/sample) were lysed in 60 µl of Laemmli sample buffer (BioRad, Mississauga, ON). Cellular proteins (25 µl) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibodies to the proteins of interest were incubated with the blots overnight at 4°C, followed by a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or mouse secondary antibody (Sigma). Protein bands were visualized using Luminol chemiluminescent detection reagents.
To switch on the shRNAs and silence the ALK gene, cells were exposed to tetracycline (Sigma), which competitively binds to TetR and triggers activation of the H1/TO promoter to transcribe shRNA-ALK. The induced shRNA selectively interacts with and silences the ALK gene. To down-regulate the ERK1/2 signaling pathway, cells were treated with the kinase inhibitor U0126, which is specific for MEK1/2, an upstream kinase in the ERK cascade (Favata et al., 1998).
The generated cells containing shRNA-ALK and the control cells with shRNA-Lamin (1 × 105/ml) were cultured with or without addition of tetracycline (3 µg/ml). Cells were harvested and stained in PBS buffer containing 0.1% trypan blue (Sigma) for 15 minutes at room temperature, and viable cells were counted using a hemocytometer. The relative cell growth rate was derived by calculating the ratio of viable cell number in cultures with treatment(s) to the cell number in control culture (without treatment). Synergistic effects were tested by treating cells (2.5 × 105/ml) with both tetracycline and U0126, and viable cells were counted as described above. To examine if there were prolonged growth inhibition effects post-treatment, cells were treated with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) and/or 0.5 µM U0126 for 8–12 days. At the various end points, the treatments were removed by washing cells twice with fresh medium. Subsequentially, equal numbers of viable cells from each condition were re-seeded and cultured in fresh medium with no treatments for an additional time period (6 days).
Cell apoptosis assays were performed using a kit from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA). Cells (1 × 105/ml) were treated with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) with or without 0.5 µM U0126 for 4 days and stained with 5 µl of FITC-conjugated Annexin V and 5 µl of Propidium Iodide. Apoptotic cells were detected using flow cytometry.
Cells (5 × 104/ml) were treated with tetracycline (3 µg/ml) and different concentrations of U0126 for 4 days. Aliquots of cells (100 µl/sample) were transferred to 96-well plates, mixed with 10 µl of assay buffer (AB solution of the MTT assay kit, Chemicon International, Temecula, CA), and incubated at 37°C for 4 hours per the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells were then lysed by the addition of 100 µl Detergent Reagent solution and the plate was analyzed using a BioRad microplate reader. The relative cell proliferation rate is represented by the detected absorbance at OD570 in each specimen using a reference wavelength of 630 nm. Final results represent the mean number from triplicate samples.
Cells were mixed with Methylcellulose Medium, a semi-solid culture medium (MethoCult® H4100, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) containing 5% FCS (final concentration) with or without tetracycline (3 µg/ml) and 0.5 µM U0126. The cell/Methylcellulose mixtures were then seeded into a 48-well culture plate (300 cells/0.5 ml/well) and cultured at 37°C for 7 days. Formed cell colonies were stained with 0.5 ml of cell staining solution overnight (Chemicon International) and counted. Meanwhile, the size of formed cell colonies was also calculated (50 colonies/specimen) by measuring their diameters under a light microscope equipped with a ruler lens.
For in vivo imaging monitoring, ALCL cells carrying shRNA constructs were transfected with pcDNA6.2-Luci/eGFP to stably express luciferase reporter (see Figure S1 for details). Subsequently, a mouse model with traceable xenografted ALCL tumors was established using SCID (SHO) nude mice (Charles River). The traceable ALCL cells (6 × 106) containing shRNA-ALK were inoculated subcutaneously in the right hind limb and cells carrying shRNA-Lamin in the left hind limb of each mouse. Tumor development was monitored by whole body bioluminescence scanning using a XENOGEN IVIS 200 IMAGING system (Figure S2) after mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and injected with δ-luciferin (75mg/kg body weight, i.p., 100 µl). Tumor-bearing mice (n=5/test condition) were fed with tetracycline water (1.5 mg/ml tetracycline and 5% sucrose) to induce shRNA for ALK gene silencing, treated with a low dose of U0126 (0.5 mg/kg body weight, i.p., 100µl), individually and in combination, and mice that did not receive either treatment were used as background controls. Changes in tumor growth were monitored by whole body scanning every 3 days as indicated. The strength of bioluminescence signal from tumors was measured as photons in a digital format (photons/second/cm2/steradian), and paired Student's t-tests were performed. Histological confirmation of the xenografted ALCL tumor was carried out with H&E staining and CD30 immunohistochemical study of tissue section after experiments were completed.
This study was supported in part by research funding from the Methodist Hospital Research Institute (CTSA) and grants from the National Cancer Institutes (1K22CA113493 and 5P50CA126752).
Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supplementary information is available at the Cancer Gene Therapy’s website