|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
Cellular senescence is a recognised mechanism of tumor suppression; however, its contribution to other pathologies is not well understood. We show that the matricellular protein CCN1/CYR61, which is dynamically expressed at sites of wound repair, can induce fibroblast senescence through its cell adhesion receptors, integrin α6β1 and heparan sulfate proteoglycans. CCN1 induces DNA damage response and p53 activation, and activates the RAC1-NOX1 complex to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and ROS-dependent activation of the p16INK4a/pRb pathway, leading to senescence and concomitant expression of antifibrotic genes. Senescent fibroblasts accumulate in granulation tissues of healing cutaneous wounds and express antifibrotic genes in wild type mice. These processes are obliterated in knockin mice that express a senescence-defective CCN1 mutant, resulting in exacerbated fibrosis. Topical application of CCN1 protein to wounds reverses these defects. Thus, fibroblast senescence is a CCN1-dependent wound healing response in cutaneous injury, functioning to curb fibrosis during tissue repair.
Originally characterized in human fibroblasts experiencing replicative exhaustion in culture1, cellular senescence is an essentially irreversible form of cell-cycle arrest that can be triggered by a variety of cellular damages or stresses, including DNA damage, oncogene activation, oxidative stress, and telomere erosion2,3. Senescent cells remain viable and metabolically active, but are unable to proliferate despite the presence of nutrients and mitogens. Recent studies have established cellular senescence as an important mechanism of tumor suppression by blocking the proliferation of damaged cells that may be at risk of neoplastic transformation4–6. However, senescent cells are also found in various noncancerous pathologies and aged tissues, although their roles in these contexts have not been thoroughly explored.
In addition to cell-cycle arrest, senescent cells exhibit an enlarged and flattened cell morphology, accumulate senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal), and upregulate a number of secreted proteins that comprise the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) or the senescence messaging secretome (SMS)2,7,8. Proteins secreted by senescent cells include proinflammatory cytokines, growth regulatory factors, and participants in extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism. Some of these secreted proteins, including IL-6, CXCR2 ligands, IGFBPs, and PAI-1, can reinforce or exacerbate senescence9–13. Although senescence can suppress tumorigenesis, some of the proteins secreted by senescent cells may paradoxically promote the malignant phenotypes of neighboring cells and disrupt the integrity and function of normal tissues14, suggesting that the SASP/SMS may play diverse and context-dependent roles in tissue pathologies. Recent studies showed that senescent hepatic stellate cells accumulate in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver damage and dampen liver fibrosis through the expression of antifibrotic proteins15. These results suggested that senescent cells may arise to limit fibrosis during tissue repair, although this possibility has not been examined beyond CCl4-induced liver injury15–17.
Among the proteins whose expression is associated with wound repair is the matricellular cell adhesive protein CCN1 (also known as CYR61), which regulates diverse cellular functions including cell adhesion, migration, differentiation, and survival in a cell type- and context-dependent manner18. CCN1 is a potent inducer of angiogenesis and Ccn1-null mice are embryonic lethal due to defects in cardiovascular development19–21. Here we show that CCN1, which is highly expressed in granulation tissues during cutaneous wound healing22, drives fibroblasts into senescence and upregulates the expression of antifibrotic genes to restrict fibrosis during tissue repair. These findings uncover a pathway of senescence induction through integrin-mediated cell adhesion, and further establish senescence as a mechanism for controlling fibrogenesis in wound healing.
Cutaneous wound healing occurs in three overlapping phases, initiating with an inflammatory phase marked by infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages, followed by a proliferative phase that includes ECM deposition, and a maturation phase that brings about matrix remodeling and resolution of the granulation tissue (Fig. 1a)23,24. CCN1 functions in fibroblasts are largely mediated through its direct binding to integrin α6β1 and cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs)25–29, whereas its angiogenic activities are mediated through integrin αvβ330. Since Ccn1-null mice are embryonic lethal, to investigate the role of CCN1 in wound healing we have used knockin mice (Ccn1dm/dm) in which the Ccn1 genomic locus is replaced by an allele encoding DM, a CCN1 mutant with the α6β1-HSPG binding sites disrupted by alanine substitutions28. Comparable levels of CCN1 protein were detected in full-thickness excisional wounds of wild type (WT; Ccn1WT/WT) and Ccn1dm/dm mice, accumulating 5–9 days post-wounding22 (Supplementary information, Fig. S1a). Although wounds of both genotypes healed completely by day 13, wound closure occurred with somewhat faster kinetics in Ccn1dm/dm mice (Fig. 1b). Consistent with faster healing, granulation tissue of Ccn1dm/dm mice showed a higher percentage of Ki-67-positive proliferating cells than WT mice, whereas the numbers of apoptotic cells were essentially identical (Fig. 1c–d). These results indicated that proportionately more cells in WT wounds were driven out of the cell cycle in an apopotosis-independent manner, suggesting that some of these cells might be undergoing senescence.
Remarkably, granulation tissues of WT mice accumulated senescent cells as judged by SA-β-gal activity, most significantly between 7–9 days post-wounding when CCN1 expression peaked (Fig. 1e; Supplementary information, Fig. S1b). Although senescent cells have been isolated from human patients with chronic non-healing wounds31,32, to our knowledge they have not been previously reported in models of normal cutaneous wounds. SA-β-gal-positive cells were virtually abolished in granulation tissue of Ccn1dm/dm mice, indicating that CCN1 is critical for the establishment or maintenance of cellular senescence. Furthermore, the senescence markers p16INK4a and p53 were detected in WT but not in Ccn1dm/dm wounds (Fig. 1f; Supplementary information, Fig. S1c). Cells staining positive for p16INK4a or p53 were also positive for α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), indicating that the senescent cells were myofibroblasts. To verify these results, fibroblasts were isolated from 7- and 9-day wounds and plated in tissue culture dishes; ~11–15 % of cells from WT wounds were SA-β-gal-positive, compared to ~3% from Ccn1dm/dm mice (Fig. 1g). These results show that CCN1, acting through its α6β1-HSPG binding sites, is required for the accumulation of senescent fibroblasts in granulation tissue during cutaneous wound healing.
To test whether CCN1 can directly induce cellular senescence, we treated young human BJ skin fibroblasts cultured in 10% serum with purified recombinant CCN1 protein. We found that CCN1 induced premature senescence as judged by several criteria. First, CCN1 arrested cell proliferation within 3 days, as shown by stagnant cell numbers and >50% decrease in BrdU incorporation and Ki-67 index compared to BSA-treated controls (Fig. 2a–c), whereas no apoptosis was observed with or without CCN1 (data not shown). CCN1 inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner, detectable at 250 ng/ml and maximal at 5 μg/ml (Supplementary information, Fig. S2a). Second, CCN1-induced growth arrest was irreversible once established, even after CCN1 was removed. Cells treated with CCN1 for 6 days to establish senescence were harvested by trypsinization and replated in fresh medium to remove extracellular CCN1. The replated cells did not divide further even after 6 more days of culture in the absence of CCN1 (Fig. 2d). Third, CCN1-treated fibroblasts exhibited an enlarged and flattened cell morphology characteristic of senescent cells (Fig. 2e), and fourth, these cells expressed markers of senescence including SA-β-gal, p53 and p16INK4a (Fig. 2f–h). Consistent with the SASP/SMS, CCN1-treated cells upregulated the expression of several proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, IL11) and matrix degrading enzymes (MMP1, MMP3), and significantly downregulated expression of type I collagen (COL1A1; Fig. 2i–k). CCN1 also induced senescence phenotypes in IMR-90 human diploid lung fibroblasts, indicating that this response is not limited to BJ cells (Supplementary information, Fig. S2b–c).
Since CCN1 is an ECM cell adhesion molecule, we tested its activity as a cell adhesion substrate. BJ cells expressed SA-β-gal when plated on immobilized CCN1 but not on fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), or vitronectin (VN; Fig. 3a), indicating that CCN1 can induce senescence as a cell adhesion substrate and this activity is unique among the ECM proteins tested. Consistent with impaired senescence in Ccn1dm/dm mice, purified DM protein26 was completely unable to inhibit DNA synthesis, induce SA-β-gal expression, or trigger the SASP/SMS (Fig. 3b–d; Supplementary information, Fig. S2e). By contrast, D125A30, a single amino acid substitution CCN1 mutant defective for binding αv integrins, was unaffected in its senescence-inducing activities (Fig. 3b–d). Pretreatment of cells with either function-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) against α6 integrin or addition of soluble heparin inhibited CCN1-induced SA-β-gal expression, whereas mAb against αvβ3 had no effect, indicating the involvement of α6β1 and HSPGs (Fig. 3e,g). Furthermore, the addition of an α6β1-specific binding peptide (T1)33 as competitor blocked CCN1-induced senescence, whereas the peptide with a two-residue substitution (T1-mut) that abrogated α6β1 binding was ineffective (Fig. 3f). These results indicate that CCN1 induces senescence through an integrin-mediated mechanism involving α6β1 and HSPGs.
Cellular responses to known senescence-inducing signals are established and maintained by either the p53 or p16INK4a/pRb tumor suppressor pathway, or both, depending on the cell type and context2,3. Both p53 and p16INK4a proteins accumulated upon CCN1 treatment, indicating their activation (Fig. 4a). It is known that DNA damage response (DDR) induced by double strand breaks or uncapped telomeres can result in activation of ATM and Chk2; phosphorylation of p53 by Chk1 or Chk2 at Ser-20 stabilizes p53 by dissociating it from HDM2/Mdm234,35. CCN1 induced phosphorylation of ATM, Chk1, and Chk2, and concomitantly, phosphorylation of p53 on Ser-20 (Fig. 4b), indicating that CCN1 activates DDR and p53. p53 can also be activated by other forms of cellular stress, including ROS36. CCN1 activation of p53 was partially inhibited by the ROS scavenger N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), indicating that CCN1 activates p53 in part through a ROS-dependent pathway (Supplementary Information Fig. S3a). pRb was also activated by CCN1 as judged by its hypophosphorylation concomitant with the induction of p16INK4a, which can activate pRb independent of p53 by inhibiting Cdk4 and Cdk6. To interrogate the functional role of p53, we expressed short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to silence its expression. Complete p53 knockdown using two different shRNA sequences (shp53#1 and #3) restored cell proliferation by ~80%, whereas a partial knockdown (shp53#2) achieved an intermediate effect (Fig. 4c–d). Expression of shRNAs per se did not affect cell growth (Fig. 4d,f). Likewise, silencing of p16INK4a by either expression of shRNA (shp16INK4a) or its suppressor Bmi-137 partially restored CCN1-induced growth suppression by <60% (Fig. 4e–f). These results show that the p53 and p16INK4a/pRb pathways both contribute to CCN1-induced senescence.
Since CCN1 is known to induce ROS accumulation28,29, which can induce senescence36,38, we assessed the role of ROS. Pretreatment of cells with NAC abrogated CCN1-induced senescence (Fig. 5a–b), indicating the requirement of ROS. CCN1-induced ROS accumulation was mediated through α6β1, as it was obliterated in cells pre-treated with anti-α6 mAb but not with anti-αvβ3 mAb (Fig. 5c). Since cell adhesion can generate ROS39, we compared ROS accumulation upon cell adhesion to CCN1 and other ECM proteins to assess how CCN1 uniquely triggers senescence. Cell adhesion to FN, LN, VN and type I collagen (Col. I) transiently induced a low level of ROS that returned to background levels by 4 hrs in most cases, whereas cell adhesion to CCN1 induced a higher level of ROS that was sustained for at least 4 hrs (Fig. 5d). Moreover, addition of NAC 3–6 h post-CCN1 treatment completely blocked senescence, whereas NAC added 10 and 24 h post-CCN1 treatment was partially and completely ineffective, respectively (Fig. 5e). Thus, CCN1 induces a high level of ROS, which must be sustained for least 6–10 hrs for the establishment of senescence.
NADPH oxidases (NOXs) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) participate in ROS generation downstream of ECM-integrin interactions28,39. The NOX inhibitor apocynin blocked CCN1-induced senescence whereas the 5-LOX inhibitor MK886 did not, suggesting that NOX, but not 5-LOX, might be responsible for ROS necessary for senescence (Fig. 6a). Consistently, shRNAs (sh5LOX #2) that completely silenced 5-LOX expression had no effect on CCN1-induced proliferation arrest (Fig. 6b). Among the five NOX isoforms, NOX1 and NOX4 are widely expressed in non-phagocytic cells including fibroblasts40. CCN1 upregulated NOX1 expression in BJ cells whereas NOX4 and catalase expression was unaffected (Fig. 6c), suggesting that NOX1 may be critical. Knockdown of NOX1 by either of two shRNAs (#1 and #2) partially bypassed CCN1-induced growth arrest, whereas knockdown of NOX4 had no effect (Fig. 6d). Furthermore, RAC1 is required for NOX1 activation, especially when cellular levels of co-activating proteins NOXO1 and NOXA1 are low, but is dispensable for NOX4 activity40. RAC1 is known to be activated by CCN1-induced adhesive signaling through α6β1-HSPGs41. Depletion of RAC1 by shRNA rescued cells from CCN1-induced growth arrest, consistent with the requirement for NOX1 (Fig. 6e). Thus, CCN1 induces the expression of NOX1 and its activation through RAC1, thereby activating the superoxide-generating RAC1-NOX1 complex required for CCN1-induced senescence. Consistently, the accumulation of superoxides in healing wounds is blunted in Ccn1dm/dm mice, indicating its dependence on CCN1 (Supplementary information, Fig. S3b).
The induction of p16INK4a is regulated by mitogenic and stress-response pathways, including the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK; p42/p44) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)42,43. Both ERK and p38 MAPK, but not JNK, were activated by phosphorylation in a biphasic manner upon CCN1 treatment (Fig. 7a; Supplementary information, Fig. S3d). The first activation phase occurred within 3 hrs after CCN1 treatment, followed by inactivation and reactivation in the second phase by 24 hrs. Pretreatment of cells with inhibitors of p38 MAPK (SB202190) or the ERK activating kinase MEK1 (PD98059) blocked CCN1-induced SA-β-gal expression, whereas the JNK inhibitor SP600126 had little effect (Fig. 7b). Moreover, both SB202190 and PD98059 abrogated CCN1-induced p16INK4a expression, but SP600126 had no effect (Fig. 7c and data not shown). These results show that ERK and p38 MAPK, but not JNK, are required for CCN1-mediated induction of p16INK4a, which is critical for senescence.
ROS can activate stress-activated kinases such as MAPKs through activation of the redox-sensitive ASK144, and sustain MAPK activation by neutralizing MAPK phosphatases via oxidative inactivation of the cysteine residue at their active sites45. Therefore, we tested whether CCN1-induced ERK and p38 MAPK activation may be ROS-dependent (Fig. 7d). Both kinases were activated by CCN1 in a biphasic manner (3h and 24h), and apocynin effectively abrogated ERK and p38 MAPK activation at both early and late phases. NAC also blocked ERK activation at both time points, and inhibited late activation of p38 MAPK. Together, these results show that CCN1-induced ROS generation leads to the activation of ERK and p38 MAPK, triggering p16INK4a induction and cellular senescence (Fig. 7e).
The fibrogenic response contributes to tissue repair by helping to reconstitute the damaged tissue through ECM deposition, although excessive fibrosis may impair tissue function24,46. Senescent cells express an antifibrotic genetic program and may thus protect against excessive fibrosis during wound healing2,15. To test whether CCN1-induced senescence regulates fibrosis in vivo, we quantified the expression of genes relevant to fibrosis in wound tissues. Granulation tissue of WT mice expressed much higher levels of Mmp2, Mmp3, and Mmp9 than Ccn1dm/dm mice (Fig. 8a). Ccn1dm/dm wounds lacked senescent cell accumulation and expressed a higher level of Col1a1 and the fibrotic mediator Tgfb1, indicating an enhanced fibrotic response (Figs. 1e, ,8b).8b). Actual collagen deposition as measured by hydroxyproline content was significantly higher in Ccn1dm/dm wounds, a difference that persisted at least 21 days post-wounding, well passed the completion of wound closure (Fig. 8c). Staining of granulation tissues with Sirius red revealed a substantial increase in collagen in Ccn1dm/dm wounds under polarized light (Fig. 8d–e). To assess the role of CCN1 in wound healing directly, we treated excisional cutaneous wounds in Ccn1dm/dm mice with topical applications of purified CCN1 protein or buffered saline. Addition of CCN1 reversed the profibrotic phenotype of Ccn1dm/dm mice, resulting in significantly enhanced expression of Mmp2, Mmp3, and Mmp9, reduced expression of Col1a1 and Tgfb1, and curtailed collagen deposition as detected by Sirius red staining (Fig. 8f–g). Furthermore, application of CCN1 protein induced cellular senescence in cutaneous wounds in the senescence-deficient Ccn1dm/dm mice (Fig. 8h). Together, these results show that CCN1 induces cellular senescence in granulation tissue and curbs the fibrogenic response during cutaneous wound healing.
We show here that the matricellular protein CCN1 induces fibroblast senescence through an integrin-mediated mechanism, resulting in the expression of antifibrotic genes to dampen fibrosis in cutaneous wound healing. Rapid synthesis of ECM occurs in wound repair to provide structural integrity to damaged tissues, although excessive matrix deposition can lead to fibrosis and scarring where ECM replaces parenchyma, resulting in loss of tissue function24,46. Fibrosis commonly occurs as a result of persistent wound healing response to chronic injuries in many mammalian organs, for example in the liver in response to viral infections, alcoholism, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, in the lung due to cigarette smoking, and in the heart after myocardial infarctions23,46. Since the wound healing process in most mammalian organs are remarkably similar irrespective of the underlying etiology24, our findings in cutaneous wound healing may be informative to wound repair more generally. Indeed, our findings echo those of recent studies showing that senescent hepatic stellate cells accumulate in CCl4-induced liver injury to limit fibrosis15. These and our findings support the notion that cellular senescence may occur as a general, programmed wound healing response that functions in disparate organ systems to control fibrosis. Therefore, whereas cellular senescence has an established role in tumor suppression, its contribution to the biology of wound healing and tissue repair is beginning to emerge.
Ccn1 was first identified as an immediate-early gene inducible by serum growth factors in fibroblasts47. Although serum was initially thought to induce a genetic program for cell proliferation, later genomic analyses indicated that a subset of serum-inducible genes represented a wound healing response48. Consistently, Ccn1 is highly expressed at sites of wound healing in various tissues, including cutaneous, cardiovascular, and bone injuries18. Here we provide direct evidence that CCN1 plays critical roles in cutaneous wound healing by its induction of fibroblast senescence and expression of antifibrotic genes. Topical treatment of wounds with purified CCN1 reversed the enhanced fibrogenesis suffered by mice lacking senescence-competent CCN1 (Fig. 8). These findings establish the functions of CCN1 in cutaneous wounds, and suggest that exogenous delivery of CCN1 or induction of CCN1 signaling may have therapeutic value for the treatment of fibrosis associated with wound healing. The specific triggers that activate CCN1 expression during wound healing are as yet unknown, although the Ccn1 promoter is responsive to a wide spectrum of inducing signals47,49. Interestingly, a related member of the CCN family, Ccn2, mediates profibrotic responses in diverse pathologies50,51. Thus, CCN1 and CCN2 may regulate the fibrogenic process during wound healing in disparate and possibly opposing ways.
CCN1 induces cellular senescence by binding to its cell adhesion receptors, integrin α6β1 and cell surface HSPGs, to engage both p53- and p16INK4a-dependent senescence pathways. Mice nullizygous for p53 and INK4a/ARF are deficient in senescent cell accumulation in CCl4-induced liver injury15, suggesting that cellular senescence may occur through similar pathways in diverse models of wound healing. Mechanistically, CCN1 triggers senescence by activating p53 through induction of a DDR and in part through a ROS-dependent pathway (Figs. 4b; Supplementary Information, Fig. S3a). CCN1 also induces ROS generation through the RAC1-NOX1 complex and ROS-dependent biphasic activation of ERK and p38 MAPK, leading to induction of the p16INK4a/pRb pathway (Fig. 7e). Although the cell adhesion process generates ROS, CCN1 is unique among ECM proteins as a cell adhesive substrate in triggering a robust and sustained accumulation of ROS necessary for senescence. Whereas CCN1 can induce ROS generation through multiple mechanisms28,29, distinct cellular sources of ROS may participate in disparate biological functions with specificity. For example, apoptotic synergism between CCN1 and TNFα requires ROS generated through 5-LOX but not NOX28, whereas CCN1-induced senescence requires NOX1 but not 5-LOX (Fig. 6). The specific nature, kinetics, and/or subcellular localization of ROS generated by distinct cellular sources may contribute to their functional specificity52.
Whether CCN1 is required for cellular senescence in disparate organ systems and in broader biological contexts beyond wound repair is currently unknown. However, it is noteworthy that CCN1 expression is elevated in several human pathologies associated with the occurrence of senescent cells, including atherosclerotic plaques, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and chronologically aged human skin53–56. These results suggest that CCN1 may contribute to senescence in certain age-related diseases and conditions. Both cellular senescence and apoptosis function in tumor suppression2,17, and CCN1 can synergize with TNFα and related cytokines to trigger robust apoptosis in vitro and in vivo28,29,57, suggesting that CCN1 may function as a tumor suppressor by inducing apoptosis and/or senescence. Indeed, several studies have suggested that CCN1 may suppress tumorigenesis58–61. Paradoxically, CCN1 is also a potent angiogenic inducer and may promote tumor growth18,19. Thus, the role of CCN1 in tumorigenesis may be cell type- and context-dependent, and may hinge upon whether angiogenic factors are limiting or whether conditions conducive for apoptosis or senescence prevail. Defining the roles of CCN1-induced senescence in diverse models of wound healing, aging-related pathologies, and tumorigenesis clearly merits further investigation.
Human BJ foreskin fibroblasts (ATCC# CRL-2522) and IMR-90 lung fibroblasts (ATCC# CCL-186) were maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in Eagle's minimum essential medium (EMEM) containing 10% FBS (Hyclone), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, non-essential amino acids and sodium pyruvate. The cumulative population doubling (CPD) was calculated using the formula n = (log10 F − log10 I)/log 2, where F is the number of cells at the end of one passage, I is the number of cells that were seeded at the beginning of one passage, and is the number of population doublings occurring in that passage. BJ cells were used between PD30 to PD45.
Recombinant CCN1 and mutant proteins (D125A and DM) were produced using a baculovirus expression system in insect cells and purified by ion-exchange or immuno-affinity chromatography22, 26. Human FN, VN, mouse LN, rat tail Col.I were from BD Biosciences. Poly-L-Lysine (PLL), heparin sodium salt, and rabbit and mouse IgGs were from Sigma. Apocynin, MK886, PD98059, SB202190, SP600126, and function-blocking mAb against integrins α6 (GoH3) and αVβ3 (LM609) were from Chemicon. The synthetic peptides T1 (GQKCIVQTTSWSQCSKS) and T1-mut (GQKCIVQTTSAAQCSKS) were previously described27, 33. HRP-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were from Amersham. Biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody and streptavidin-conjugated HRP were from Invitrogen.
SA-β-gal assay was performed as described62. For analysis in wounds, frozen tissue sections (6 μm) were fixed in 1% formalin before staining, and counterstained with Eosin. For growth curves, cells (1 × 104 cells per well) were grown in 12-well plates and treated as indicated. Cells were stained with 1% trypan blue (Invitrogen) and the total cell numbers counted. For BrdU incorporation and Ki-67 immunostaining, cells in 8-well chamber slides (2 × 103 cells per well) were treated with CCN1 for 3 days and either left untreated or labeled with BrdU (10 μg/ml, Roche applied science) for 2h. Then cells were fixed using Carnoy's fixative (ethanol:acetic acid=3:1), washed, and BrdU-/Ki-67 positive cells were visualized by FITC-conjugated anti-BrdU Ab (Millipore) or TRITC-conjugated anti-Ki67 Ab (Abcam), respectively. Fluorescence images were taken from 5 random fields in each well using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope with the AxioCam MRc5 camera (AxioVision Rel 4.6 software) and BrdU/Ki-67 positive cells were scored and normalized against DAPI positive cells. All assays were done in triplicates, and ~300 cells were counted in each sample from randomly selected fields.
Western blot analyses were performed using standard procedure with chemiluminescence using ECL system (GE Heathcare). Antibodies against the following proteins were used: p53 (DO-1; SC126) and p16 (H-156; SC756) from SantaCruz Biotech; p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204; #9101), ERK1/2 (137F5; #4695), p-p38MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182; 28B10; #9216), p38MAPK (#9212), p-JNK1/2 (Thr183/Tyr185; #9251), JNK1/2 (#9252), p-Chk1 (S345; #2341), p-Chk2 (Thr68; #2661), p-p53 (Ser20; #9287) from Cell Signaling; RAC1 (#07-1464) from Millipore; p-ATM (Ser-1981; #200-301-400) from Rockland; Rb (G3-245; 554136) from BD Pharmingen; 5-Lipoxygenase (Ab59341) from Abcam; and β-actin (AC-15) from Sigma.
For RNA interference, 19-nucleotide target sequences were designed using software of the RNAi consortium (BROAD institute) and cloned into the Mlu I and Cla I sites of the pLVTHM vector (Addgene; 12247), where the TTCAAGAGA loop sequence links the 19-nt sense and antisenence sequences. Target sequences for each molecule are described in Supplementary Information, Table I. For lentiviral supernatants production, 293FT cells (Invitrogen) were transfected using the CaCl2 method with the following transfer plasmids: pLVTHM, pshp53 (#1, #2 and #3)63–65, pBmi1 (Addgene; 12240), pSINpuro-sip16 (a generous gift from Dr. Scott W. Lowe)66, pshNOX1 (#1 and #2), pshNOX4, psh5LOX (#1 and #2), and pshRAC1 using either 2nd or 3rd generation packaging system. After 48 to 72 h, the viral supernatants were collected through 0.45 μm filter and stored at −80 °C. For infection, cells were plated (3 × 105 cells per 60 mm dish) and infected with a cocktail (3:1 ratio of growth media to viral supernatant) containing 1.5 μg/ml polybrene for 48h. Cells were then re-plated as each experiment required. The infection efficiency (>99%) was determined by monitoring expression of green fluorescent protein encoded by the pLVTHM vector.
BJ cells or skin wound tissues were homogenized using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and total RNA from each sample was isolated using RNeasy® Mini Kit (Quiagen). Total RNA (2 μg) were reverse transcribed to cDNA using MMLV-Reverse Transcriptase (Promega), and qRT-PCR was performed with the iCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). The specificity of qRT-PCR was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and melting-curve analysis. A housekeeping gene (β-actin or cyclophilinE) was used as an internal standard. The primers used in this study are described in Supplementary information, Table II.
H2DCF-DA (Invitrogen) for H2O2 and dihydroethidium (DHE; Invitrogen) for O2- were used for ROS measurement as described28. Briefly, cells were plated on 8-well chamber slides or slides pre-coated with matrix proteins and treated with CCN1 for indicated times. Cells were then incubated with either H2DCF-DA or DHE (10 μM, each) for 10 min at 37 °C, washed with 0.5% BSA containing HANKS' balanced salt solution (HBSS). The fluorescence images were acquired using Leica DM IRB microscope and fluorescence intensity was calculated using ImageJ software (NIH). For measurement in tissues, cutaneous wounds were harvested various days after wounding and superoxide levels were quantified by lucigenin-enhanced chemi-luminescence67. Skin tissues were cut into small pieces (2×2 mm) and placed in polypropylene tubes containing 5 μmol/L lucigenin in 1 mL modified Krebs' solution. Tubes were read in a luminometer (TD-20, Turner Designs). The luminometer reports relative light units emitted, which were integrated over 5 min. After measurement, tissues were dried overnight and dry weight was measured.
Animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Illinois at Chicago. Two independent lines of Ccn1dm/dm mice were generated in a svJ129-C57BL/6 mixed background28 and backcrossed a minimum of 10 times into the C57BL/6 background. Ccn1WT/WT and Ccn1dm/dm mice (12 weeks of age) were anesthetized with intraperitoneal (IP) injection of ketamine/xylazine (100 mg/kg IP) and the dorsum of each mouse was clipped free of hair. Full-thickness excisional wounds were created with a 6 mm biopsy punch (Miltex) and left open during the healing process. Wound sizes were measured daily. Mice were sacrificed at 5, 7, 9, 13 and 21 days post-wounding and wound tissues harvested. Wound tissues were snap-frozen in O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek) and sectioned serially (6 μm thickness) using a Leica CM1950 UV cryostat. Anti-Ki67 polyclonal antibody was used for monitoring proliferation in the granulation tissues and a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody is coupled with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP), followed by the reaction with 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma) to produce brown nuclear staining. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Apoptosis during wound healing was detected by TUNEL assay using ApopTag Red in situ apoptosis detection kit (Millipore) and visualized under the fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss; Axiovert 200M).
Recombinant CCN1 protein was diluted in PBS to a concentration of 0.1 μg/μl, and 50 μl of protein or saline control was directly applied daily to each full-thickness excisional wound created in Ccn1dm/dm mice. Wound tissues were collected 9 days post-wounding and processed for analysis.
Frozen wound tissues were processed for double immunofluorescence. Acetone-fixed wound tissue sections were washed in PBST (2×) for 2 min and incubated in normal goat serum blocking solution containing 2% goat serum, 1% BSA, 0.1% cold fish skin gelatin, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.05% sodium azide, and 0.01M PBS (pH 7.2) for 1h. For labeling, the antibody mix containing either anti-p16 polyclonal antibody (M156, SantaCruz) and anti-smooth muscle actin mAb (Sigma) or anti-p53 mAb (DO-1; SantaCruz) and anti-smooth muscle actin polyclonal antibody (Abcam) was applied for 2 h at room temperature. After washing (5×) in PBST, the slides were incubated with the secondary antibody mix (TRITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG for p53, TRITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG for p16) for 30 min, followed by washing (5×) in PBST. For counterstaining, DAPI (1 μg/ml) was used. The fluorescence images were acquired using with a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope and processed with Photoshop 7 (Adobe).
Cells were isolated from 7- and 9-day wounds (n=3) as described68 and plated in 60 mm culture dishes. For hydrxoyproline assay, skin wounds (n=3 for both genotypes) were harvested at indicated days and dried in 110°C oven overnight, placed in a screw-capped glass vessel and hydrolyzed in 6 N hydrochloric acid at 110°C for 18 h. The lysates were processed and hydroxyproline content determined as described69, using purified hydroxyproline to generate a standard curve. Alternatively, frozen section of wound tissues were processed for Sirius red staining (Sigma) and viewed under polarized light. The Sirius red-positive area was calculated using ImageJ software (NIH).
Results are expressed as the mean ± S.D., and statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA analysis of variance and Student's t-test. A p<0.05 was considered significant.
We thank Dr. Luisa DiPietro for invaluable expert advice, Drs. Judith Campisi and Scott Lowe for generous gifts of reagents, Seung Won Shin for excellent assistance, and members of the laboratory for helpful discussion. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM78492 and CA46565) to L.F.L.
COMPETING FINANCIAL INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests.