PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of croKargerHomeAlertsResourcesThis articleJournal Home
 
Case Rep Oncol. 2010 Jan-Apr; 3(1): 54–58.
Published online 2010 March 3. doi:  10.1159/000289584
PMCID: PMC2918844

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Bladder

Abstract

The case was a 67-year-old male who visited our hospital with a major complaint of macroscopic hematuria. A bladder tumor was found. When a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed, the histopathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine bladder cancer. After chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide a partial shrinkage of the tumor was observed; however, the patient expired 7 months after the first visit.

Key Words: Neuroendocrine tumor, Bladder tumor, Bladder cancer

Introduction

Primary neuroendocrine cancer of the bladder is a rare histological occurrence, constituting 0.48-1% of all bladder cancers. The 5-year survival rate is around 8% and the prognosis is extremely unfavorable. Due to the morphology of the tumor, treatments based on small cell lung cancer have been performed. In this study, we treated a case in which chemotherapy was performed with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16) for neuroendocrine cancer that occurred in the bladder; here, we report the results.

Case Report

Our patient was a 67-year-old male with a major complaint of macroscopic hematuria. His previous history included a traumatic brain hemorrhage at the age of 60 years and stomach cancer at the age of 64 years. He had no family history in particular.

Current Medical History

In February 2009, the patient noticed blood in his urine and visited our department. A cystoscopy revealed a nodular tumor on the right bladder wall. An MRI and bone scintigraphy revealed metastasis to both external iliac lymph nodes, resulting in a diagnosis of clinical stage T3bN2M0. In March 2009, the patient was hospitalized for the purpose of undergoing a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-Bt).

Laboratory Data at the Time of Admission

Hematological values: RBC 361/μl, WBC 7,600/μl, Hb 11.7 g/dl, Plt 18.8 × 104/μl.

Biochemistry: Alb 4.5 g/dl, TP 7.0 g/dl, T-bil 0.5 mg/dl, AST 16 IU/l, ALT 12 IU/l, ALP 263 IU/l, LDH 178 IU/l, BUN 16 mg/dl, Cre 0.84 mg/dl, Na 139 mEq/l, K 4.7 mEq/l, Cl 102 mEq/l, CRP 0.07 g/dl.

Urinary analysis: pH 5.5, RBC >51/hpf, WBC 11-20/hpf, protein (2+), glucose (-).

Urinary cytology: class IIIb.

Image Findings

Simple pelvic MRI revealed a high basic tumorous lesion with low signals for T1WI, high signals for T2WI, and a diameter of 4 cm on the right bladder wall, and invasion outside the wall was observed. In the external iliac artery regions on both sides, enlarged lymph nodes with a diameter of 1.5 cm were observed. No obvious distal metastasis was detected by bone scintigraphy and thoracic pelvic CT.

Post-Admission Course

In March 2009, a TUR-BT was immediately performed for the purpose of obtaining a pathological diagnosis. In the histopathological findings, there were a number of large and small solid alveoli of atypical cells accompanied by infiltrative growth into the interstitium. The atypical cells had a high N/C ratio and rough chromatin, and the neoplastic alveoli also suggested differentiation into the neuroendocrine system (fig. 1a). When immunohistological staining was performed, the tumor cells were partially positive for CD56 and chromogranin A and negative for synaptophysin (fig. 1b). Based on the morphology and the results of immunohistological staining, the patient was diagnosed with neuroendocrine cancer.

Fig. 1
a Hematoxylin-eosin stain (×400). b CD56 (×400).

Post-Operative Course

In June 2009, the patient was hospitalized for the purpose of undergoing additional treatment. The NSE upon admission was 260 ng/ml. A positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) performed before chemotherapy revealed metastasis to the liver, bones, and lymph nodes (fig. 2). Based on the protocol for small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16) was performed along with PE therapy (P: 80 mg/body, E: 100 mg/body). The NSE after completing the first course declined to 9.1 ng/ml and CT also revealed tumor shrinkage (fig. 3). However, before implementing the second course, the patient's systemic condition deteriorated, and in August 2009, the patient expired due to multiple systemic metastases.

Fig. 2
PET-CT. a Liver. b, c Bone. d Lymph node metastases.
Fig. 3
CT of abdomen. a, c Before chemotherapy. b, d After chemotherapy.

Discussion

Since first being reported by Cramer et al. in 1981 [1], neuroendocrine bladder cancer has often been reported as primary small cell cancer of the bladder. Histologically, it is believed that this condition exhibits a similar histological appearance as small cell lung cancer, where the tumor cells are small, the nuclei are rich in chromatin and are circular or spindle-shaped, and tumor cells with scarce cytoplasm solidly proliferate. For immunostaining, CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A are used. In this study, CD56 and chromogranin A were shown to be partially positive. The case in this study involved a high-grade neuroendocrine cancer according to the World Health Organization classification, and using the classifications of lung cancer, many parts had morphologies equivalent to those of small cell cancer, while some parts exhibited morphologies of large cell cancer.

Blomjous et al. [2] have reported that primary neuroendocrine cancer of the bladder constitutes approximately 0.48% of all bladder tumors in autopsy cases. At the time of diagnosis, primary neuroendocrine cancer of the bladder is detected as an advanced cancer occurring in T3 and T4 in 70% and 16.3% of cases, respectively. In addition, the 5-year survival rate has been reported to be 8.1-19%, and the prognosis is extremely unfavorable [2,3]. In our present case, too, the cancer progressed rapidly and resulted in death 6 months after diagnosis.

Regarding treatment, multimodality therapy combining surgical therapy and chemotherapy/radiation therapy is often implemented; however, this is not yet an established therapy. Based on cases of small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy is mainly performed with PE therapy using a combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16), and there are reports in which the prognosis was improved [4]. In this study, we also performed PE therapy based on small cell lung cancer and observed a decrease in the NSE value and a shrinkage of the tumor on CT images.

As primary neuroendocrine cancer of the bladder progresses rapidly, we believe that it is important to select multimodality therapy via early detection.

References

1. Cramer SF, Aikawa M, Cebelin M. Neurosecretory granules in small cell invasive carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Cancer. 1981;47:724–730. [PubMed]
2. Blomjous CE, Vos W, Schipper NW, et al. Morphometric and flow cytometric analysis of small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the bladder. J Clin Path. 1989;42:1032–1039. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Abbas F, Civantos F, Benedetto P, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Urology. 1995;46:617–630. [PubMed]
4. Mackey JR, Au HJ, Venner P, et al. Genetourinary small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a report of 25 cases. J Urol. 1998;153:1820–1822.

Articles from Case Reports in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers