PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
J Immunol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2918804
NIHMSID: NIHMS224035

Cutting Edge: Responder T Cells Regulate Human DR+ Effector Regulatory T Cell Activity via Granzyme1

Abstract

MHC class II expression identifies an effector subset of human CD4+CD25highFoxP3high natural regulatory T cells (DR+ Tregs) that induces more rapid suppression and exhibits higher FoxP3 expression than the remaining Treg population. Although Tregs are known to be highly sensitive to apoptosis, in this study we demonstrate that this sensitivity is primarily a feature of DR+ Tregs. Granzyme B (GzmB) is strongly expressed by nonregulatory responder CD4 T cells, whereas effector DR+ Tregs express little GzmB. Strong TCR stimulation markedly increases the expression of GzmB in all dividing responder CD4 T cells and mitigates the suppression by DR+ Tregs. DR+ Treg suppressive activity reemerges if GzmB is neutralized. We show that responder cells actively kill effector Tregs by producing GzmB in response to strong TCR stimulation. Thus, the production of GzmB by strongly activated CD4 T cells represents a mechanism by which CD4 T cells resist Treg suppression.

Natural CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs)3 play a central role in maintaining self-tolerance through their ability to actively suppress pathogenic, self-reactive T cells (13). The human CD25high Treg population can be divided into functionally distinct subsets on the basis of ex vivo expression of HLA class II (DR) cells, which are also CD127−/low. Our group recently demonstrated that HLA DR delineates a subset of ex vivo CD25high Tregs (referred to as DR+ Treg) that express higher ex vivo levels of FoxP3, induce a more vigorous and rapid T cell suppression, and exhibit a much lower capacity to expand than the CD25high Tregs that lack HLA class II expression (DR Tregs) (4). These features indicate that the DR+ Tregs represent an effector Treg population.

Although the mechanism by which Tregs exert their suppressive activity remains largely unknown, their activity is highly regulated by cell contact and apoptosis (5). Dependence on cell contact and high expression of FoxP3 are the hallmark attributes used to distinguish Tregs from inhibitory FoxP3low Tr1 or Th3 cells that suppress via the secretion of IL-10 or TGFβ (6). Recent reports suggest that Tregs can suppress by either inactivating or killing target CD4 T cells (7, 8). The Tregs themselves have also been shown to be highly sensitive to apoptosis that is mitigated by IL-2 (215). More recently, the highly proapoptotic state of the Treg was shown to be modulated by changes in expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family genes that can be altered by PD1, CD30, or CD28 signals (9, 10).

In this report, we investigated how the activity of the highly suppressive DR+ Treg population may be regulated. We demonstrate that activated CD4 responder T cells (Tresp) produced granzyme B (GzmB) to inactivate DR+ Tregs. The DR+ Tregs did not express GzmB or granzyme A (GzmA) during their suppression of weakly stimulated responder cells that expressed low levels of GzmB. Conversely, high GzmB expression by Tresp cells and the appearance of GzmB in the Tregs accompanied the loss in suppression that occurs with strong TCR stimulation. Importantly, the suppressive capacity of DR+ Tregs was enhanced by inhibiting the expression of GzmB in responder CD4 cells or by blocking GzmB activity, thus preventing DR+ Treg death. By silencing the expression of GzmB in responder CD4 cells, the expression of GzmB in the cocultured DR+ Tregs was also inhibited, indicating that the expression of GzmB in the Tresp and in strongly stimulated Tregs is linked. These data demonstrate a novel role for GzmB to down-regulate effector DR+ Treg function.

Materials and Methods

Cell isolation

Whole mononuclear cells were isolated from human blood drawn as approved by our institutional review board by Ficoll-Hypaque (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences) gradient centrifugation. Total CD4 T cells were isolated via the CD4+ T cell negative isolation kit II from Miltenyi Biotec. Tregs were FACS sorted as reported previously (4), gating on HLA DR+ and DR subsets of CD4+ CD62LhighCD25high cells stained with HLA-DR (L243), CD62L (Dreg 56), or CD25 (M-A251) on a FACSAria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) to typically >98% purity.

Cell culture reagents

Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented as described previously (4) with 5% human AB serum (Cellgro Mediatech). The anti-CD3 (UCHT1 at 1 or 3 μg/107 beads) and anti-CD2 (BMA 0111 at 1 μg/107 beads) Abs were purchased from BD Pharmingen and Dade Behring, coupled to tosyl-activated beads (Dynal Biotech), and used at 1 × 104 beads/ well. GzmB inhibitor I (z-AAD-CMK), purchased from EMD/Calbiochem, was added at 1.0 μM.

In vitro micro coculture assay and flow cytometry analyses

Sorted cell populations were plated directly after ex vivo isolation; the CD4+CD25 Tresps were plated at 2.5 × 103/well and the DR+ or DR Tregs at 1.25 × 103/well, resulting in a 2:1 ratio. CFSE dilution (11) or proliferation was monitored on day 4 by CFSE dilution (11) or by pulsing (24 h) each well with 1μCi of [3H]thymidine (PerkinElmer). Intracellular protein expression was performed using the buffers from the eBioscience FoxP3 staining kit with mAbs for FoxP3 (206D BioLegend or PCH101; eBioscience), GzmB (eBioGrB; eBioscience), or isotypes. In some experiments, loss of cell viability was assessed by a 20-min incubation with a live/dead viability dye (Invitrogen) before fixation. In other experiments, stimulated cells were labeled with annexin V (BD Pharmingen). Data were acquired on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) using CellQuest software and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Extracellular GzmB quantification

One hundred microliters of supernatants collected from day 4 cell cultures were interrogated for GzmB content via the human soluble protein flex system from BD Pharmingen and for GzmB activity via the GzmB drug discovery kit from Biomol International as per the manufacturer’s suggestions.

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) transduction

CD4+CD25 Tresps (1 × 106) were electroporated with 2.3 nmol of each individual annealed and HPLC-purified siRNA oligonucleotides purchased from Ambion as suggested by the human T cell siRNA transduction kit (Amaxa). The Ambion catalogue numbers for the siRNA oligonucleotides were s6387 (siGzmB) and 4635 (siControl) (Ambion).

Results

Strong TCR signals inhibit DR+ Treg suppression and enhance GzmB expression

In contrast to the murine system, CD2 is a major costimulatory pathway in human T cells (12). We previously demonstrated that CD2 and not CD28 costimulatory signals induced the rapid early suppressive activity of DR+ Tregs (4). Because GzmB expression differs with the mode of T cell stimulation (7, 8), we tested whether CD2 costimulation and TCR stimulation of different strengths altered GzmB expression and Treg suppression. As shown in Fig. 1A, we found that strong stimuli enhanced GzmB expression in Tresps, because all divided CD4 T cells expressed high or low levels of GzmB. In contrast to weak stimulation cocultures, strong anti-CD3/anti-CD2-stimulated DR+ Treg cocultures exhibited markedly less suppression and no modulation of responder cell expression of GzmB. These data suggested an inverse relationship between responder cell expression of GzmB and Treg suppression.

FIGURE 1
Strong anti-CD3/anti-CD2 (αCD3αCD2) stimulation increases GzmB in Tresps and decreases suppression and viability of DR+ Tregs. Both DR+ and DR Tregs were cultured alone or with CFSE-labeled Tresp cells at low or high anti-CD3 ...

Highly suppressive DR+ Tregs did not express GzmB in weakly stimulated cocultures, whereas strong stimulation induced the same DR+ Tregs to express low levels of GzmB and lose suppressive activity. An equal percentage of the less suppressive DR Tregs expressed GzmB regardless of the strength of stimulation. To determine whether the GzmB induced by strong stimulation led to Treg apoptosis, the DR+ and DR Tregs were stained for viability and FoxP3 after 4 days of coculture with strong stimulation (Fig. 1B). The data indicated that although the DR+ Tregs expressed the highest levels of FoxP3 ex vivo, they responded to strong stimulation with a striking loss of viability and concomitant loss in Foxp3 expression, whereas only a small fraction of DR Tregs lost viability and FoxP3 expression.

Because strong stimuli drastically increased GzmB expression in Tresps, we next measured whether stimulation strength affected the secretion and activity of GzmB. As shown in Fig. 2, Tresps secreted a greater amount of enzymatically active GzmB with stronger stimulation in contrast to the low level of GzmB induced by weak stimulation that was inactive. Coculturing Tresps with either type of Treg under weak stimulation markedly reduced GzmB secretion, whereas the addition of Tregs had no effect on the level or activity of the GzmB secreted with strong stimulation.

FIGURE 2
Strong stimulation induces the secretion of active GzmB. Supernatants from 4-day weak or strong anti-CD3/anti-CD2 (αCD3αCD2) stimulations of Tresp cells, DR+ or DR Tregs, and 1:0.5 cocultures were examined for total GzmB content ...

DR+ Tregs are highly sensitive to apoptosis

Because the entire Treg population has been suggested to be highly sensitive to apoptosis, we next examined whether the DR+ and DR Tregs exhibited differential sensitivity to apoptosis and expressed different ratios of Bcl-xL /Bax. Measuring the expression of Bcl family proteins in weakly stimulated and actively suppressing Tregs, the DR+ Tregs exhibited a significantly lower level of Bcl-xL vs Bax and a higher expression of annexin V (>50%) than the DRTregs (Fig. 2C). In additional experiments, we found that treatment with recombinant human GzmB augmented DR+ Treg apoptosis, whereas it had no effect on Tresp or DR Treg viability (supplemental Fig. 1).4 These data suggest that the DR+ Tregs are much more sensitive to apoptosis than the DR Tregs, which only exhibit 20% annexin V expression.

GzmB inhibits DR+ Treg-induced suppression by inducing their apoptosis

To determine whether GzmB directly inhibited suppression in DR+ Treg cocultures, we established DR+ Treg cocultures with different strength stimuli where GzmB was or was not blocked from the outset with an irreversible cell-permeable peptide inhibitor that specifically binds to the active site of GzmB (GzmB inhibitor I, z-AAD-CMK). Examining whether inhibiting GzmB in the context of strong TCR stimulation reduced the level of DR+ Treg apoptosis, we measured annexin V expression in replicate cultures established under low-dose (1 μg) or high-dose (3 μg) anti-CD3/anti-CD2 stimulation.

The stronger TCR stimulation again induced the DR+ Tregs to become extremely apoptotic (Fig. 3B, bottom), as >70% expressed annexin V in response to high-dose anti-CD3/anti-CD2, while 45% expressed annexin V in the lower stimulation cocultures (Fig. 3A). When GzmB activity was blocked, the frequency of apoptotic DR+ Tregs was reduced to 48% in these strong stimulation cocultures and the level of suppression in DR+ Treg cocultures was markedly enhanced, as the frequency of CFSEhigh responder cells more than doubled from 27 to 58% (Fig. 3B). In contrast, the addition of the inhibitor had no effect on the complete suppression induced in the low-strength stimulation cocultures or on the poor suppression induced by anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulation (supplemental Fig. 2). Thus, inactivating GzmB increased suppression and DR+ Treg viability in strong anti-CD3/anti-CD2 stimulated cocultures.

FIGURE 3
Strong stimulation abrogates suppression and induces GzmB-dependent apoptosis of DR+ Tregs. CFSE-labeled Tresp cells were stimulated with weak (A) or strong (B) anti-CD3/anti-CD2 (αCD3αCD2) alone or together with DR+ or DR Tregs ...

The ability of a GzmB blockade to augment DR+ Treg suppression was also observed when proliferation was measured via [3H]thymidine-incorporation (Fig. 3C). In four separate experiments using cells from different donors, blocking the activity of GzmB typically resulted in a 30% increase in DR+ Treg suppression over that of control cocultures (Fig. 3D), whereas there was no effect on the DR Treg suppressive capacity. These data indicated that GzmB plays an active role in inhibiting the suppressive capacity of DR+ Tregs in response to strong TCR signals, while it has little effect on DR Treg suppression.

CD4 Tresps produce GzmB to regulate DR+ Treg effector activity

To determine whether the source of the “suppression-inactivating” GzmB was the CD4 Tresp or the Treg, we selectively silenced GzmB in Tresps by electroporating them with siRNA oligonucleotides specific for GzmB or a negative control siRNA, labeling them with CFSE, and using them as targets of suppression in Treg coculture assays. Responder T cells transduced with GzmB oligonucleotides expressed significantly less GzmB and underwent enhanced suppression after anti-CD3/anti-CD2 stimulation as compared with siControl responder cells (Fig. 4A, top). Thus, the frequency of nonproliferating, CFSEhigh responder cells increased from 59 to 97% for siGzmB-treated cells cocultured with DR+ Tregs, whereas the siControl responder cells or the DR Treg cocultures showed no change in suppression (Fig. 4A, bottom). Analyzing the CFSE Tregs in these cocultures, the DR+ Tregs were found to only express GzmB and an exacerbated loss of viability and FoxP3 expression if they had been stimulated in the presence of GzmB-expressing siControl Tresps (Fig. 4B).

FIGURE 4
GzmB produced by Tresps inhibits DR+ Treg suppression. Tresps were electroporated with GzmB specific (siGzmB) or nonhybridizing negative control (siControl) siRNA oligonucleotides, CFSE labeled, and stimulated alone or in coculture with DR+ or DR ...

Discussion

Activation-induced cell death and activated T cell autonomous death are two death pathways thought to maintain T lymphocyte homeostasis, contract the immune response, and delete inappropriate self-reactive cells (13). T cells can undergo apoptosis by the extrinsic pathway via signals from death receptors such as Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) or by the intrinsic pathway involving altered ratios of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members. In this study we show that strong TCR signals can also induce the death of effector Tregs via a third mechanism: by increasing their sensitivity to GzmB-mediated death.

A number of reports on Treg sensitivity to apoptosis under different experimental conditions have come to contrasting conclusions on the role of Fas or TCR signals in CD25high Treg apoptosis. Fritzsching et al. reported that long-term expanded human total CD25high Tregs were resistant to activation-induced cell death by TCR restimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 but sensitive to apoptosis induced by CD95 cross-linking (14). More recently, Strauss et al. showed that CD25high Tregs were sensitive to death when cocultured with CD4 responder cells in the presence of high (150 U/ml) doses of IL-2, but resistant to apoptosis at extremely high (1000 U/ml) levels of IL-2 (15). Our data demonstrating that DR+ Tregs are highly sensitive to apoptosis mediated by GzmB produced by CD4 T cells suggest a mechanism for this observation, whereby GzmB-mediated induction of Treg apoptosis is a mechanism used by highly activated T cells to counteract highly suppressive Tregs.

In contrast to reports that granzymes are effector molecules produced by a subset of mouse Tregs or by CD46-induced human Tregs, our data indicate that GzmB actually inhibits the effector function of GzmB Tregs. Our data indicate that CD4 T cells are not susceptible to GzmB, supporting prior reports of strong CD4 T cell expression of the GzmB inhibitor PI-9 (16). Whether the DR+ and DR Tregs differentially express PI-9 in response to different strength stimulation is under investigation. Moreover, we find that GzmB is only expressed by DR+ Tregs when they are stimulated under conditions that will not lead to suppression, such as strong TCR stimulation in the presence of GzmB-sufficient responder CD4 T cells. Furthermore, as compared with the DR Tregs, the DR+ Tregs express less of the antiapoptotic Bcl proteins that can inhibit mitochondrial release of cytochrome c (13).

The data we present here indicate that the highly suppressive DR+ effector Tregs are regulated by apoptosis and are significantly more prone to undergo cell death than the DR Tregs. Similar to the DR Tregs, naive Tregs from adult peripheral blood (CD45RA+CD25+) are also relatively resistant to apoptosis (17) and do not express HLA class II (data not shown). We show that strongly activated responder cells can regulate effector Tregs by producing GzmB in a mechanism that is distinct from the Fas/FasL signaling reported by others (15, 18). Importantly, these data also indicate that the higher frequency, proliferation-competent, DR Tregs remain viable in the presence of strong stimuli and that all CD4 Tresps have the capacity to express GzmB. Furthermore, although human Tregs have been suggested to function by killing targets via a GzmA-mediated mechanism (7), we found no evidence that human DR+ or DR Tregs expressed GzmA in highly suppressive cocultures (data not shown). Rather, our data suggest that the GzmB produced by Tresps limits the suppressive capacity of human DR+ effector Tregs. Together with the previous findings that activated/cycling Tregs are sensitive to FasL-induced apoptosis (17), our finding that in vivo activated, nonproliferating effector DR+ Tregs are sensitive to GzmB-induced apoptosis suggests the importance of apoptosis in Treg homeostasis, and indicates that different apoptotic pathways may be involved in regulating functionally distinct Treg populations.

In conclusion, these data indicate a previously unrecognized role for GzmB in regulating the interaction between responder CD4 T cells and effector DR+ Tregs, whereas it has little effect on the less suppressive DR Tregs. Shedding light on the observations made a number of years ago linking strong stimulation with poor Treg suppression, these new findings suggest that strongly stimulated CD4 T cells use GzmB to resist suppression by natural Tregs.

Supplementary Material

supplemental data

Footnotes

1This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS24242, U01 DK6192601, R01 NS2424710, P01 AI39671, and P01 NS38037, by National Multiple Sclerosis Society Grants RG3825A1, RG2172C9, and RG3308A10, by the 2004 Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies Centers of Excellence Amgen Award, and by the 2007 Dana Scholars Award.

Disclosures The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

3Abbreviations used in this paper:

Treg
regulatory T cell
FasL
Fas ligand
GzmA
granzyme A
GzmB
granzyme B
siRNA
small interfering RNA
Tresp
responder T cell

4The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

References

1. Brunkow ME, Jeffery EW, Hjerrild KA, Paeper B, Clark LB, Yasayko SA, Wilkinson JE, Galas D, Ziegler SF, Ramsdell F. Disruption of a new forkhead/winged-helix protein, scurfin, results in the fatal lymphoproliferative disorder of the scurfy mouse. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:68–73. [PubMed]
2. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:330–336. [PubMed]
3. Totsuka T, Kanai T, Makita S, Fujii R, Nemoto Y, Oshima S, Okamoto R, Koyanagi A, Akiba H, Okumura K, et al. Regulation of murine chronic colitis by CD4+CD25 programmed death-1+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005;35:1773–1785. [PubMed]
4. Baecher-Allan C, Wolf E, Hafler DA. MHC class II expression identifies functionally distinct human regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2006;176:4622–4631. [PubMed]
5. Shevach EM, DiPaolo RA, Andersson J, Zhao DM, Stephens GL, Thornton AM. The lifestyle of naturally occurring CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 2006;212:60–73. [PubMed]
6. Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Battaglia M, Bacchetta R, Fleischhauer K, Levings MK. Interleukin-10-secreting type 1 regulatory T cells in rodents and humans. Immunol. Rev. 2006;212:28–50. [PubMed]
7. Grossman WJ, Verbsky JW, Barchet W, Colonna M, Atkinson JP, Ley TJ. Human T regulatory cells can use the perforin pathway to cause autologous target cell death. Immunity. 2004;21:589–601. [PubMed]
8. Gondek DC, Lu LF, Quezada SA, Sakaguchi S, Noelle RJ. Cutting edge: contact-mediated suppression by CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells involves a granzyme B-dependent, perforin-independent mechanism. J. Immunol. 2005;174:1783–1786. [PubMed]
9. Li L, Godfrey WR, Porter SB, Ge Y, June CH, Blazar BR, Boussiotis VA. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell lines from human cord blood have functional and molecular properties of T-cell anergy. Blood. 2005;106:3068–3073. [PubMed]
10. Goteri G, Simonetti O, Rupoli S, Piccinini G, Rubini C, Stramazzotti D, Fazioli F, Capomagi C, Leoni P, Offidani AM, Lo Muzio L. Differences in survivin location and Bcl-2 expression in CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders of the skin compared with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphomas: an immunohistochemical study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007;157:41–48. [PubMed]
11. Parish CR. Fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration and proliferation studies. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1999;77:499–508. [PubMed]
12. Yang JJ, Ye Y, Carroll A, Yang W, Lee HW. Structural biology of the cell adhesion protein CD2: alternatively folded states and structure-function relation. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2001;2:1–17. [PubMed]
13. Arnold R, Brenner D, Becker M, Frey CR, Krammer PH. How T lymphocytes switch between life and death. Eur. J. Immunol. 2006;36:1654–1658. [PubMed]
14. Fritzsching B, Oberle N, Pauly E, Geffers R, Buer J, Poschl J, Krammer P, Linderkamp O, Suri-Payer E. Naive regulatory T cells: a novel subpopulation defined by resistance toward CD95L-mediated cell death. Blood. 2006;108:3371–3378. [PubMed]
15. Strauss L, Bergmann C, Whiteside TL. Human circulating CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ regulatory T cells kill autologous CD8+ but not CD4+ responder cells by Fas-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 2009;182:1469–1480. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hirst CE, Buzza MS, Bird CH, Warren HS, Cameron PU, Zhang M, Ashton-Rickardt PG, Bird PI. The intracellular granzyme B inhibitor, proteinase inhibitor 9, is up-regulated during accessory cell maturation and effector cell degranulation, and its overexpression enhances CTL potency. J. Immunol. 2003;170:805–815. [PubMed]
17. Yolcu ES, Ash S, Kaminitz A, Sagiv Y, Askenasy N, Yarkoni S. Apoptosis as a mechanism of T-regulatory cell homeostasis and suppression. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2008;86:650–658. [PubMed]
18. Reardon C, Wang A, McKay DM. Transient local depletion of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells during recovery from colitis via Fas/Fas ligand-induced death. J. Immunol. 2008;180:8316–8326. [PubMed]