PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Med Clin North Am. Author manuscript; available in PMC Sep 1, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2918412
NIHMSID: NIHMS144054
Anemia in the Preoperative Patient
Manish S. Patel, MDa and Jeffrey L. Carson, MDb
aAssistant Professor of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
bRichard C. Reynolds Professor of Medicine and Chief, Division of General Internal Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, New Brunswick, New Jersey
a Corresponding author for proof and reprints: Manish S. Patel, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, 732-235-6539, 732-235-7144 (fax), patel168/at/umdnj.edu
bCo-author address: Jeffrey L. Carson, MD, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of General Internal Medicine, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, 732-235-7122, 732-235-7144 (fax), carson/at/umdnj.edu
Synopsis
Anemia is commonly encountered in the preoperative patient. With variable etiology, determination of the cause of the anemia can impact perioperative surgical and medical management and outcome. Red blood cell transfusions are often administered during the perioperative time period in patients with preoperative anemia, although evidence to support the optimal transfusion threshold is limited. We review the evaluation of anemia, as well as evidence regarding perioperative blood transfusions. Recommendations on the treatment of anemia, including perioperative blood transfusions, are outlined.
Keywords: anemia, erythrocyte transfusion, surgery, preoperative care
Anemia
Anemia is the most common hematological problem in the preoperative patient. Often, it is a sign of an underlying disease or condition that could affect the surgical outcome. Consequently, blood transfusions are commonly given perioperatively to anemic patients. In 2006 the supply of allogenic whole blood/red blood cells in the U.S. was estimated to be over 15.7 million units, and an estimated 14.6 million units were transfused.47 It has been shown that 40 to 70% of all red cell units are transfused in the surgical setting.12,15,19,46 Therefore, an understanding of the causes and consequences of anemia, as well as any potential treatments, is crucial in the preoperative setting.
Evaluation of Anemia
History and Physical Examination
The evaluation of the anemic preoperative patient should always begin with a thorough history and physical examination. The history should first attempt to elicit symptoms of bleeding such as menstrual blood loss, hematochezia, melena, hematemesis, hemoptysis, or hematuria. It is also important to ask about symptoms related to the anemia and the body’s compensatory mechanisms, that is, anginal chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue and palpitations. Any history of or symptoms of underlying illnesses, such as constitutional symptoms, malignancy, renal failure, endocrinopathies (thyroid disorders, for example), infections, or liver disease, should be targeted. Past history of anemia is also important, including previous hemoglobin values and therapies, onset, need for previous blood transfusions, splenectomy, and blood donations. The patient’s family history may contain a history of anemia, bleeding and other hematological disorders, splenectomy, and early onset cholelithiasis, which may indicate congenital hemolytic disorders. The social history should take into account occupational hazards and exposures, dietary habits, alcohol and illicit drug use, and a detailed list of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal and over-the-counter medications.
The physical examination should focus on manifestations and potential etiologies of the anemia, such as pallor of the skin and mucous membranes, jaundice, signs of bleeding, purpura, petechiae, hepatosplenomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. A heart murmur is sometimes heard, and this may be a flow murmur due to decreased blood viscosity and elevated cardiac output from the anemia, or it may indicate the presence of a prosthetic valve. A pelvic and rectal exam with stool guaiac may need to be performed to evaluate for possible sources of blood loss.
Diagnostic Evaluation
An approach to anemia is given in Figure 1. Initial laboratory testing should include a complete blood count (CBC), peripheral blood smear, and a reticulocyte count. In addition, stool guaiac, radiological, and endoscopic testing may be required in an effort to exclude blood loss. The reticulocyte count can be an indication of bone marrow production, but it usually needs to be corrected for differences in hematocrit and the effect of erythropoietin on the marrow. This is done by calculating a reticulocyte production index (RPI). [Figure 2]
Figure 1
Figure 1
Approach to anemia. RPI, reticulocyte production index; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; TTP/HUS, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome; RBC, red blood cell; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calculating the Reticulocyte Production Index (RPI).
An RPI of less than 2 usually indicates a hypoproliferative anemia, or an inappropriate/decreased marrow response to the anemia. The next step would be to look at the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) on the CBC to characterize the anemia as microcytic, normocytic, or macrocytic. Iron deficiency and thalassemia are the most common causes of microcytic anemia, and, therefore, initial work-up includes obtaining serum ferritin, serum iron, and total iron-binding capacity. Further tests may consist of hemoglobin electrophoresis or a bone marrow biopsy. In normocytic anemia, acute blood loss must first be excluded. Additional causes of normocytic anemia may include underlying renal or liver disease; early iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiency; dimorphic anemia, such as concurrent iron and vitamin B12 deficiency; myelodysplasia/aplastic anemia; or anemia of chronic disease due to an underlying inflammatory condition. The testing for normocytic anemia may entail many of the serologies discussed for microcytic anemia, assessment of renal and liver function, and bone marrow biopsy. Macrocytic anemia can be characterized as megaloblastic and nonmegalobloastic anemia. Megaloblastic anemia may be due to vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, drugs such as chemotherapeutic agents or anticonvulsants, and myelodysplasia. Nonmegaloblastic anemia includes alcohol ingestion, liver disease, or hypothyroidism. Initial work-up should comprise measurement of vitamin B12 and folate levels. Further tests may include thyroid or liver function tests and a bone marrow biopsy.
An RPI of greater than 2 demonstrates an appropriate marrow response to blood loss or may indicate hemolysis. Initial studies would include direct and indirect bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase, haptoglobin level, and direct and indirect Coomb’s test. The peripheral smear should also be reviewed for clues to the underlying process. Polychromasia, basophilic stippling, and nucleated red blood cells can all be seen in hemolytic anemia. In addition, several findings may point towards a specific cause. For example, schistocytes are generally associated with microangiopathic hemolytic anemias, such as those due to disseminated intravascular coagulation, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome, and hemolysis from prosthetic valves. Spherocytes may be seen in hereditary spherocytosis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and also in microangiopathic hemolytic anemias.
Risk of Anemia in Surgical Patients
The risk of anemia in patients can be ascertained from studies involving those who decline blood transfusions. The largest such study was a retrospective cohort study performed on 1958 consecutive surgical patients who refused transfusions based on religious reasons. The overall 30-day risk of mortality increased with decreasing preoperative hemoglobin concentrations, especially in those patients with a hemoglobin level of less than 6 g/dL.6 The risk of death was much greater, however, in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and preoperative hemoglobin value of 10 g/dL or less. A subsequent study on the same population showed that none of the 99 patients with postoperative hemoglobin concentrations between 7 and 8 g/dL died, whereas there was a sharp rise in mortality in those patients with a hemoglobin concentration less that 5 to 6 g/dL.8
These results are consistent with a series of studies in which healthy subjects underwent acute isovolemic reduction to a hemoglobin level of 5 g/dL.28,41,44,45 Two of these studies found evidence of asymptomatic and reversible ST- segment changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia in 5 of the 87 combined patients at hemoglobin concentrations between 5 to 7 g/dL.28,45 Another study evaluated eight healthy volunteers during isovolemic reduction and found self-assessed fatigue at a hemoglobin level of 7 g/dL, which then decreased further at hemoglobin levels of 6 g/dL and 5 g/dL.41 Minor and reversible cognitive changes were seen in nine healthy subjects, including decreased reaction times at hemoglobin concentration of less than 6 g/dL and impaired immediate and delayed memory at hemoglobin levels less than 5 g/dL.44 These studies show that even healthy subjects can exhibit clinical changes at hemoglobin concentrations between 5 and 7 g/dL.
Elderly patients, however, may respond to and tolerate preoperative anemia differently than younger patients. In one study of twenty patients over the age of 65 and free from known cardiac disease, isovolemic anemia to a mean hemoglobin concentration of 8.8 g/dL was well tolerated.39 Another study examined patients with known coronary artery disease and found that isovolemic anemia was well tolerated to hemoglobin value of 9.9 g/dL. In addition, the increase in cardiac index and oxygen extraction during hemodilution was found to be independent of age.38 The results of these studies should be interpreted with caution as they involved small numbers of patients and very few were over the age of 80 years.31
A more recent study analyzed preoperative hematocrit levels in over 310,000 elderly veterans undergoing noncardiac surgery.49 In contrast to the two previous studies, even mild anemia was associated with an increased risk of thirty-day morbidity and mortality. There was a monotonical rise in mortality and cardiac events when the hematocrit level was less than 39%. These results, however, may not be able to be generalized to elderly females. Moreover, it is unclear whether the anemia is causal or associated with the increased morbidity and mortality, and whether this risk may be corrected with transfusion.36
Current Evidence Relevant to Transfusion
Observational Studies
There have been many observational studies documenting the effect of anemia and red blood cell transfusions on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, and those admitted to intensive care units. A recent systematic review of the literature identified 45 cohort studies including 272,596 patients.32 With the exception of three studies, the risks of transfusion appeared to outweigh the benefits. Transfusion was associated with an increase risk of death, infection, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, this analysis has important limitations including that the analysis did not take into account the hemoglobin concentration before transfusion and very high likelihood of uncontrolled confounding.9 Those requiring blood transfusions are more severely ill than the patients that do not require them and it is impossible to completely adjust for these differences between the patients who have received transfusions and those who have not. Therefore, the decision to transfuse a preoperative patient must rest on the strength of randomized clinical trials.
Randomized Clinical Trials
There are ten randomized clinical trials in adults to date that distinguish the consequences of various transfusion thresholds.4,5,18,20,25,30,40 The clinical settings of the studies were diverse, but each of the studies did randomize patients to receive transfusions based on a “restrictive” versus a “liberal” strategy. Of the ten clinical trials, five took place within a surgical setting. One study evaluated 39 patients after myocardial revascularization and found no difference in morbidity between the conservative and liberal group, but mortality was not evaluated.25 Another study involved 428 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting who were randomized to receive transfusion for a hemoglobin threshold less than 9 g/dL and less than 8 g/dL.5 There was no difference in mortality, morbidity, and clinical outcomes between the two groups. A third study included 127 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty who were assigned to receive either two units of autologous red blood cells immediately postoperatively or to be transfused only if the hemoglobin fell below 9 g/dL.30 The mean postoperative hemoglobin values between both groups only differed by 0.7 g/dL. There were more nonsurgical complications in the conservative transfusion group. In another study 84 hip fracture patients were randomized to receive blood transfusion either when the hemoglobin fell below 10 g/dL or if they became symptomatic (this also included transfusion if the hemoglobin level was less than 8 g/dL).10 There were no statistical differences in morbidity, mortality, or functional recovery between the two groups, although a trend of increased 60-day mortality was seen in the liberal transfusion group (11.9% vs. 4.8% in the restrictive group).
The largest randomized clinical trial, and the only one with adequate power to assess clinical outcomes related to transfusion triggers, is the Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care (TRICC) trial.20 838 normovolemic, critically ill patients were randomized to a restrictive transfusion strategy or a liberal strategy. In the restrictive transfusion group, patients were transfused if the hemoglobin concentration dropped below 7 g/dL and were maintained between 7 and 9 g/dL. In the liberal transfusion group, patients received transfusion for hemoglobin levels less than 10 g/dL, and their hemoglobin values were maintained between 10 and 12 g/dL. Consistent with other studies, the average hemoglobin value and red cells units transfused were significantly lower in the restrictive trigger group. There was no statistical difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups, although there was a trend towards lower mortality in the restrictive transfusion group (18.7% vs. 23.3%). The restrictive transfusion group did have lower rates of myocardial infarction (0.07% vs. 2.9%, p=0.02) and pulmonary edema (5.3% vs. 10.7%, p<0.01) than the liberal-strategy group. Those patients with underlying ischemic heart disease showed no difference in the 30-day mortality rate between the two transfusion groups. Although this study took place in the critical care setting, it provides useful information even for perioperative patients.
A meta-analysis evaluated all ten randomized clinical trials pertaining to red cell transfusion triggers.7,23 Several important conclusions were drawn from data that was pooled from the various studies. Firstly, a restrictive transfusion trigger had a lower likelihood of RBC transfusion by 42% (relative risk [RR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.77), saving an average of 0.93 units of red cells per transfused patient. Secondly, there were 24% fewer cardiac events in the restrictive trigger groups, although the statistical significance was borderline (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00). Thirdly, patients in the restrictive trigger groups had, on average, 5.6% lower hematocrit levels than the liberal trigger groups. Fourthly, there was no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the restrictive and liberal trigger groups. Finally, there was no increase in mortality seen in the restrictive trigger groups when compared to those with liberal transfusion triggers. Actually, restrictive transfusion triggers were associated with a one fifth lower mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.02), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.07). It should be noted that 83% of the data on mortality was taken from the TRICC trial. This meta-analysis, however, found insufficient evidence pertaining to restrictive transfusion triggers in the setting of cardiovascular disease, hematological disorders, and renal failure. The authors of the review concluded that additional randomized clinical trials need to be done in various clinical settings and especially in those with underlying cardiovascular disease.
There is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial called FOCUS currently underway that is evaluating red cell transfusion strategy in hip fracture patients with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease risk factors in up to 2000 patients.11 The results should be available in 2009.
Treatment of Anemia
Reversible Causes
In the case of iron deficiency anemia, the underlying cause, such as blood loss, should be identified and treated. Therefore, a thorough gastrointestinal evaluation is often indicated. The supplementation of iron, however, should also be initiated. Iron is most easily given in the oral form, the least expensive of which is ferrous sulfate. Ferrous sulfate provides 65 mg of elemental iron per 325 mg tablet. It is recommended that adults receive 150 to 200 mg of elemental iron per day in deficiency states. Oral iron is more readily absorbed in an acidic gastric environment and, therefore, often given with ascorbic acid and while avoiding antacids. Reticulocytosis is generally seen in seven to ten days, and the hemoglobin level should increase by 1 g/dL every two to three weeks. If patients have failed oral iron therapy, or if iron loss exceeds capacity for oral iron absorption, intravenous iron therapy may be necessary. Common clinical scenarios in which this occurs include patients with inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal malabsorption from celiac disease, patients intolerant to oral iron therapy, or patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Of the intravenous iron preparations ferric gluconate and iron sucrose are generally thought to have the best safety profile. Recent studies and systematic reviews, however, suggest that low-molecular-weight iron dextran may have a comparable toxicity profile to iron sucrose.2,13,33,35
Anemia due to vitamin B12 or folate deficiency is also easily treated with supplementation. Folate deficiency should be treated with folic acid, 1 mg per day for up to four months, or until the patient’s anemia is corrected. Vitamin B12 deficiency is usually treated with intramuscular cobalamin injections. The dosage of cobalamin may vary depending on the severity of the anemia and symptoms, from 1000 mcg daily for seven days, to 1000 mcg every one to four weeks. Studies have also shown that oral cobalamin supplementation of 1000-2000 mcg per day for four months, may be at least as effective as parenteral cobalamin, but this requires greater patient compliance.16,26 Reticulocytosis may be expected in three to five days, and hemoglobin levels should rise within ten days.
Patients with anemia of chronic disease, chronic renal insufficiency, zidovudine-treated HIV-infected patients and other hematological diseases may benefit from use of erythropoietin prior to surgery. In many patients erythropoietin will raise the hemoglobin concentration enough to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion after surgery.17,27 The target hemoglobin concentration should be no greater than 12 g/dL to avoid potential risks associated with erythropoietin (i.e., thromboembolism3,34, serious cardiovascular events14,37, and mortality34), and all patients should received thromboembolism prophylaxis. We recommend against using erythropoietin in patients with cancer since there are some studies demonstrating increase risk of tumor progression or recurrence.21,22,29
Red Cell Transfusion Guidelines
The old adage of transfusing red cells such that the hemoglobin is greater than 10 g/dL and the hematocrit is more than 30% prior to operations no longer applies. The evidence to date suggests that a more conservative threshold for transfusion can be used in most patients. Recently updated guidelines from the American Society of Anesthesiology recommend transfusion if hemoglobin level is less than 6 g/dL and that transfusion is rarely necessary when the level is more than 10 g/dL.1 When hemoglobin concentrations fall between 6 and 10 g/dL, the guidelines state that transfusion decisions should be based on indication of organ ischemia, risk of or ongoing bleeding, intravascular volume status, and susceptibility to complications of inadequate oxygenation.
A special mention should be made about preoperative transfusions in patients with sickle cell disease, as the perioperative complication rate in this patient population can be as high as 67%.43 Surgical stress and trauma can increase the rate of anemia and sickle cell formation, and red cell transfusions are often used to preserve oxygen-carrying capacity and to dilute the sickle cells. A randomized clinical trial evaluated transfusion regimens in patients undergoing 602 surgical procedures.42 Patients were randomly assigned to either an aggressive transfusion strategy, which maintained a preoperative hemoglobin level of 10 g/dL and a hemoglobin S level of 30% or less, or a conservative strategy, in which transfusions were given to maintain a hemoglobin concentration of 10 g/dL regardless of the hemoglobin S level. There was no difference in the rate of serious complications between the two groups, but transfusion-related complications were twice as likely in the aggressive strategy group (odds ratio 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.77). A Cochrane Database review concluded that although a conservative transfusion strategy appears as effective in preoperative patients as an aggressive regimen, further studies are needed to determine the best possible course of therapy and whether preoperative transfusion is required in all surgical settings.24
In our opinion a transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL can be used safely in most perioperative patients, provided that they have no underlying ischemic heart disease and are asymptomatic. The optimal threshold is unknown in patients with cardiovascular disease for there is no randomized evidence available. We recommend carefully evaluating each patient’s symptoms and signs and not basing the transfusion decision solely on a hemoglobin concentration. Those patients who are symptomatic from their anemia should be transfused as needed. The optimal rate of red cell administration should be guided by the clinical situation. Active exsanguination may require transfusion rates as high as five to ten units of red cells over ten to fifteen minute, whereas, those patients at risk for volume overload should be transfused at one mL/kg/hour. Most patients may be transfused at one unit of red cells every one to two hours, and a hemoglobin level rise of 1 g/dL should be expected per unit of red cells transfused.48 After each red cell unit is transfused, a repeat hemoglobin level should be obtained, and the patient should be reevaluated.
Summary
Anemia produces a unique set of challenges in the preoperative patient. An efficient evaluation of anemia relies on a detailed history and physical examination and a systematic approach to the diagnostic testing. The presence of anemia, as well as the use of perioperative blood transfusions, has potential ramifications on the surgical outcome. While the current evidence suggests a lower transfusion threshold may be appropriate in most preoperative patients, the decision to transfuse must be individualized to the patient and the clinical setting.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Grant No. U01 HL73958 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes, National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Practice guidelines for perioperative blood transfusion and adjuvant therapies: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:198. [PubMed]
2. Auerbach M, Goodnough LT, Picard D, et al. The role of intravenous iron in anemia management and transfusion avoidance. Transfusion. 2008;48:988. [PubMed]
3. Bennett CL, Silver SM, Djulbegovic B, et al. Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia. Jama. 2008;299:914. [PubMed]
4. Blair SD, Janvrin SB, McCollum CN, et al. Effect of early blood transfusion on gastrointestinal haemorrhage. British Journal of Surgery. 1986;73:783. [PubMed]
5. Bracey AW, Radovancevic R, Riggs SA, et al. Lowering the hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in coronary artery bypass procedures: effect on patient outcome. Transfusion. 1999;39:1070. [PubMed]
6. Carson JL, Duff A, Poses RM, et al. Effect of anaemia and cardiovascular disease on surgical mortality and morbidity. Lancet. 1996;348:1055. [PubMed]
7. Carson JL, Hill S, Carless P, et al. Transfusion triggers: a systematic review of the literature. Transfus Med Rev. 2002;16:187. [PubMed]
8. Carson JL, Noveck H, Berlin JA, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients with very low postoperative Hb levels who decline blood transfusion. Transfusion. 2002;42:812. [PubMed]
9. Carson JL, Reynolds RC, Klein HG. Bad bad blood? Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2707. [PubMed]
10. Carson JL, Terrin ML, Barton FB, et al. A pilot randomized trial comparing symptomatic vs. hemoglobin-level-driven red blood cell transfusions following hip fracture. Transfusion. 1998;38:522. [PubMed]
11. Carson JL, Terrin ML, Magaziner J, et al. Transfusion trigger trial for functional outcomes in cardiovascular patients undergoing surgical hip fracture repair (FOCUS) Transfusion. 2006;46:2192. [PubMed]
12. Cook SS, Epps J. Transfusion practice in central Virginia. Transfusion. 1991;31:355. [PubMed]
13. Critchley J, Dundar Y. Adverse events associated with intravenous iron infusion (low-molecular-weight iron dextran and iron sucrose): a systematic review. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine. 2007;9:8.
14. Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, et al. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355:2071. [PubMed]
15. Eisenstaedt RS. Modifying physicians’ transfusion practice. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 1997;11:27. [Review] [69 refs] [PubMed]
16. Eussen SJ, de Groot LC, Clarke R, et al. Oral cyanocobalamin supplementation in older people with vitamin B12 deficiency: a dose-finding trial. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1167. [PubMed]
17. Faris PM, Ritter MA, Abels RI. The effects of recombinant human erythropoietin on perioperative transfusion requirements in patients having a major orthopaedic operation. The American Erythropoietin Study Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:62. [PubMed]
18. Fortune JB, Feustel PJ, Saifi J, et al. Influence of hematocrit on cardiopulmonary function after acute hemorrhage. Journal of Trauma. 1987;27:243. [PubMed]
19. Friedman EA, Burns TL, Shork MA. A study of national trends in transfusion practice. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service; 1980.
20. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:409. see comments. [PubMed]
21. Henke M, Laszig R, Rube C, et al. Erythropoietin to treat head and neck cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362:1255. [PubMed]
22. Henke M, Mattern D, Pepe M, et al. Do erythropoietin receptors on cancer cells explain unexpected clinical findings? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4708. [PubMed]
23. Hill SR, Carless PA, Henry DA, et al. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002:CD002042. [PubMed]
24. Hirst CWL. Preoperative blood transfusions for sickle cell disease, in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; Chichester, UK: 2001.
25. Johnson RG, Thurer RL, Kruskall MS, et al. Comparison of two transfusion strategies after elective operations for myocardial revascularization. Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 1992;104:307. [PubMed]
26. Kuzminski AM, Del Giacco EJ, Allen RH, et al. Effective treatment of cobalamin deficiency with oral cobalamin. Blood. 1998;92:1191. [PubMed]
27. Laupacis A, Feagan B, Wong C. Effectiveness of perioperative recombinant human erythropoietin in elective hip replacement. COPES Study Group. Lancet. 1993;342:378. [PubMed]
28. Leung JM, Weiskopf RB, Feiner J, et al. Electrocardiographic ST-segment changes during acute, severe isovolemic hemodilution in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1004. In Process Citation. [PubMed]
29. Longmore GD. Do cancer cells express functional erythropoietin receptors? N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2447. [PubMed]
30. Lotke PA, Barth P, Garino JP, et al. Predonated autologous blood transfusions after total knee arthroplasty: immediate versus delayed administration. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999;14:647. [PubMed]
31. Madjdpour C, Spahn DR, Weiskopf RB. Anemia and perioperative red blood cell transfusion: a matter of tolerance. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:S102. [PubMed]
32. Marik PE, Corwin HL. Efficacy of red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2667. [PubMed]
33. Moniem KA, Bhandari S. Tolerability and efficacy of parenteral iron therapy in hemodialysis patients, a comparison of preparations. Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine. 2007:37.
34. Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M, et al. Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369:381. [PubMed]
35. Sav T, Tokgoz B, Sipahioglu MH, et al. Is there a difference between the allergic potencies of the iron sucrose and low molecular weight iron dextran? Ren Fail. 2007;29:423. [PubMed]
36. Shander A, Goodnough LT. Do preoperative anemia and polycythemia affect clinical outcome in patients undergoing major surgery? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:20. [PubMed]
37. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355:2085. [PubMed]
38. Spahn DR, Schmid ER, Seifert B, et al. Hemodilution tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease who are receiving chronic b-adrenergic blocker therapy. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 1996;82:687. [PubMed]
39. Spahn DR, Zollinger A, Schlumpf RB, et al. Hemodilution tolerance in elderly patients without known cardiac disease. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:681. [PubMed]
40. Topley E, Fischer MR. The illness of trauma. British Journal of Clinical Practice. 1956;1:770. [PubMed]
41. Toy P, Feiner J, Viele MK, et al. Fatigue during acute isovolemic anemiain healthy, resting humans. Transfusion. 2000;40:457. [PubMed]
42. Vichinsky EP, Haberkern CM, Neumayr L, et al. A comparison of conservative and aggressive transfusion regimens in the perioperative management of sickle cell disease. The Preoperative Transfusion in Sickle Cell Disease Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine. 1995;333:206. see comments. [PubMed]
43. Vichinsky EP, Neumayr LD, Haberkern C, et al. The perioperative complication rate of orthopedic surgery in sickle cell disease: report of the National Sickle Cell Surgery Study Group. Am J Hematol. 1999;62:129. [PubMed]
44. Weiskopf RB, Kramer JH, D P, et al. Acute severe isovolemic anemia impairs cognitive function and memory in humans. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1646. [PubMed]
45. Weiskopf RB, Viele MK, Feiner J, et al. Human cardiovascular and metabolic response to acute, severe isovolemic anemia. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279:217. [PubMed]
46. Wells AW, Mounter PJ, Chapman CE, et al. Where does blood go? Prospective observational study of red cell transfusion in north England. Bmj. 2002;325:803. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Whitaker BI, Green J, King MR, et al. The 2007 National Blood Collection And Utilization Survey Report. AABB. 2007
48. Wiesen AR, Hospenthal DR, Byrd JC, et al. Equilibration of hemoglobin concentration after transfusion in medical inpatients not actively bleeding. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:278. [PubMed]
49. Wu WC, Schifftner TL, Henderson WG, et al. Preoperative hematocrit levels and postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Jama. 2007;297:2481. [PubMed]