Search tips
Search criteria 


Curr Biol. 2008 March 11; 18(5): 354–362.
PMCID: PMC2917768

Impaired Synaptic Plasticity and Motor Learning in Mice with a Point Mutation Implicated in Human Speech Deficits


The most well-described example of an inherited speech and language disorder is that observed in the multigenerational KE family, caused by a heterozygous missense mutation in the FOXP2 gene [1]. Affected individuals are characterized by deficits in the learning and production of complex orofacial motor sequences underlying fluent speech and display impaired linguistic processing for both spoken and written language [2]. The FOXP2 transcription factor is highly similar in many vertebrate species, with conserved expression in neural circuits related to sensorimotor integration and motor learning [3, 4]. In this study, we generated mice carrying an identical point mutation to that of the KE family, yielding the equivalent arginine-to-histidine substitution in the Foxp2 DNA-binding domain. Homozygous R552H mice show severe reductions in cerebellar growth and postnatal weight gain but are able to produce complex innate ultrasonic vocalizations. Heterozygous R552H mice are overtly normal in brain structure and development. Crucially, although their baseline motor abilities appear to be identical to wild-type littermates, R552H heterozygotes display significant deficits in species-typical motor-skill learning, accompanied by abnormal synaptic plasticity in striatal and cerebellar neural circuits.

Keywords: SYSNEURO

Results and Discussion

An Allelic Series of Mice Carrying Foxp2 Point Mutations

By using gene-driven N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis screening [5], we generated mice with distinct point mutations in Foxp2, backcrossed onto clean genomic backgrounds (Figure 1A; Figure S1 and Supplemental Experimental Procedures available online). The Foxp2-R552H line carries an arginine-to-histidine substitution identical to the R553H substitution in affected members of the KE family [1], disrupting DNA-binding and transactivation properties [6]. Foxp2-N549K mice harbor a substitution nearby, at another conserved site of the DNA-binding domain. The Foxp2-S321X line carries a premature stop codon close to the human R328X nonsense mutation found in a second family segregating FOXP2-related speech and language deficits [7]. Although levels of Foxp2 mRNA and protein are normal in R552H and N549K mutants, S321X homozygotes show reduced quantities of Foxp2 messenger RNA (mRNA) (likely due to nonsense-mediated RNA decay), absence of Foxp2 protein, and no detectable truncated product (Figure S1). Intermediate levels of mRNA and protein are observed for S321X heterozygotes. Thus, S321X is effectively a null allele, implying a similar mechanism for the human R328X mutation [7].

Figure 1
Foxp2-R552H Mutant Mice

R552H and S321X homozygotes show reduced weight gain, which is not explained by feeding difficulties or lack of maternal care (Figure 1B, Figure S2A). They display delayed maturation of the righting reflex (Figure 1C, Figure S2B), and die approximately 3–4 weeks after birth. The developing lung is a site of Foxp2 expression; complete Foxp2 loss in knockout mice yields postnatal dilation of distal airspaces, although ultrastructural examinations have found number and morphology of alveolar epithelial cells to be normal [8]. We assessed the hematocrit of R552H and S321X homozygotes (Figure S3). Levels were indistinguishable from wild-type animals, indicating no major oxygenation deficits.

We carried out histological analyses of forebrain structures at P21 in mutants, including conserved Foxp2 expression sites in the cortex, striatum, and thalamus [9, 10], and found no gross abnormalities. However, the cerebellum of homozygotes was disproportionately small, with decreased foliation (Figure 1D; Figure S4). Despite this reduced volume, cerebellar histoarchitecture at P21 remained intact—Purkinje cells (PCs) aligned in a continuous row, and granule cells had completed migration into the internal granular layer (Figure 1D; Figure S4). N549K homozygotes display comparable deficits in postnatal development and cerebellar volume to R552H and S321X homozygotes, but symptoms are milder and show variable expressivity, with prolonged survival (3–5 months).

Consistently across the allelic series, our heterozygous Foxp2 mutants are fully viable and healthy, without delays in weight gain or in righting-reflex maturation (Figures 1B and 1C, Figure S2). Heterozygote brain development appears grossly normal, even for the cerebellum, where size and histoarchitecture do not differ from wild-types (Figure 1D, Figure S4).

Foxp2-R552H Heterozygotes Display Impaired Motor-Skill Learning

Understanding of the neural bases of FOXP2-related disorder in humans comes primarily from investigations of the KE family. Affected family members carry a heterozygous R553H mutation yielding difficulties in sequencing mouth movements, as well as impaired expressive and receptive language [2]. Structural neuroimaging has shown that brains of affected people are overtly normal, but voxel-based morphometry detected subtle changes in gray-matter density, most notably in the inferior frontal gyrus, striatum, and cerebellum [11]. Functional neuroimaging revealed abnormalities during covert (silent) language tasks, including underactivation of the inferior frontal gyrus and putamen [12]. Thus, it has been proposed that this heterozygous R553H mutation affects frontostriatal and/or frontocerebellar networks involved in learning, planning, and execution of rapid movement sequences [4]. Our Foxp2-R552H heterozygous mice facilitated the first in vivo investigations of this KE point mutation in an animal model.

R552H heterozygotes show normal embryonic and postnatal development (Figure 1) and base-line motor abilities (Table S1, Figure S5). We assessed motor-skill learning by using a tilted voluntary running-wheel system that enables investigations of species-typical motor patterns in home-cage environments without being confounded by stress responses to handling or disrupted diurnal rhythms [13]. All mice spent a substantial amount of time on the wheels, running in typical short bouts (Figure 2A). After the first day, bout length showed a characteristic rapid increase, accompanied by a steep drop in bout number (Figures 2B and 2C). These rapid early changes in motor patterns reflect behavioral learning rather than alterations in cardiovascular fitness [13]. Importantly, genotype did not affect performance on the first day. However, R552H heterozygotes subsequently displayed slower increases in bout length than wild-type littermates, paralleled by more gradual declines in bout number (Figures 2B and 2C), indicating significant (p < 0.005) deficits in learning to use the wheel. Furthermore, the rate of increase in average running speed, a separate index of motor-skill learning [13], was significantly lower in heterozygotes (p < 0.01; Figure 2D).

Figure 2
Impaired Motor-Skill Learning of Foxp2-R552H Heterozygous Mice on Voluntary Running-Wheel Systems and Accelerating Rotarods

Although Foxp2 is expressed in the developing lung, these findings cannot be explained by respiratory impairment. Throughout voluntary training, there was no effect of genotype on time spent running, indicating similar fitness and motivation in R552H heterozygotes and wild-type littermates (Figure 2A). At the outset, heterozygotes showed normal performance—on day 1, average speed, distance, time spent running, bout length, and bout number did not differ from those of wild-types (Figures 2A–2D). Furthermore, although heterozygotes are slower to learn, they do achieve rapid speeds (Figure 2D), and bout length and bout number eventually reach wild-type levels. Finally, in studies of targeted Foxp2 knockouts (see below), extensive investigations of postnatal lung alveolarization and distal airways did not detect any lung abnormalities in heterozygotes [8].

To further exclude respiratory confounds, we studied independent cohorts of R552H heterozygotes by using accelerating rotarods, an alternative paradigm routinely used for the assessment of rodent motor-skill learning [14]. On the first trials, heterozygotes performed similarly to wild-type littermates, but they subsequently improved at significantly slower rates (p < 0.0001; Figure 2E), mirroring the voluntary running-wheel data. R552H heterozygotes did not show enhanced anxiety in the elevated-plus-maze or open-field arena, altered spontaneous locomotor activity in automated recordings, general cognitive deficits in the T maze, or abnormal grooming (Table S1, Figure S5).

Foxp2-R552H Heterozygotes Show Abnormal Synaptic Plasticity

Previous work highlighted the cortex, striatum and cerebellum (specifically PCs and deep cerebellar nuclei) as key sites of embryonic and postnatal Foxp2 expression [9, 10]. Corticostriatal and corticocerebellar circuits are known to mediate motor-skill learning [15], although their potential distinctive contributions to such abilities remain unclear. Given the absence of overt morphological abnormalities in R552H heterozygous brains, we used electrophysiology to assess functional properties of striatal and cerebellar neurons from these animals.

For assessment of striatal function, we recorded evoked field potentials from the dorsolateral striatum, a region previously implicated in skill learning on the accelerating rotarod [16–18]. The input-output function—reflecting the amplitude of the evoked population spike in relation to the stimulation strength—was similar between R552H heterozygotes and wild-type littermates (Figure 3A). There were also no differences in the stimulation strength necessary to evoke half of the maximum response (WT = 0.92 ± 0.11 mA, R552H = 0.90 ± 0.13 mA, t15 = 0.12, p > 0.05). Thus, R552H heterozygotes do not display major abnormalities in synaptic organization or transmission in the dorsolateral striatum.

Figure 3
Abnormal Synaptic Plasticity of Foxp2-R552H Heterozygous Mice in the Striatum and Cerebellum

We next examined synaptic plasticity in this region, investigating long-term depression (LTD) at glutamatergic synapses induced by high-frequency stimulation, a form of plasticity mediated by endocannabinoid retrograde signaling [19–21]. There were significant differences in striatal synaptic plasticity between wild-type mice and R552H heterozygotes (p < 0.05), with only the former displaying significant LTD (Figure 3B). In contrast, R552H heterozygotes showed depression of the evoked responses immediately after high-frequency stimulation, but no LTD (p > 0.05). These data indicate that LTD in the dorsolateral striatum of R552H heterozygotes is strongly impaired.

For examination of cerebellar circuits, we employed electrophysiological recordings and Ca2+ imaging to assess climbing-fiber (CF) and parallel-fiber (PF) inputs of PCs in acute slices. CF fibers undergo a characteristic elimination of redundant inputs during the first two postnatal weeks. Disturbed cerebellar development typically yields multiple weak CF inputs that fail to form strong one-to-one multisite synaptic contacts with the PC [22]. CF-induced inputs in R552H heterozygotes were normal, with no indication of disturbed CF elimination (Figures S6A–S6C). Regardless of genotype, only about 10% of PCs showed multiple CF innervation, typical for normal development [22]. Furthermore, CF stimulation triggered full-blown dendritic Ca2+ transients with peak amplitudes and temporal integrals indiscernible from those of wild-types (Figures S6A and S6B). Similarly, activation of PF inputs yielded normal excitatory postsynaptic potentials mediated by AMPA-type glutamate receptors. Therefore, R552H heterozygotes display a grossly normal cerebellar synaptic circuitry.

We went on to assess two types of cerebellar synaptic plasticity. (1) Paired-pulse facilitation of the PF-PC synapse represents a form of short-term plasticity resulting primarily from enhanced presynaptic transmitter release due to residual Ca2+ ions [23] and partly from extracellular K+ accumulation [24]. Paired-pulse facilitation in R552H heterozygotes was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced at short interstimulus intervals (10–75 msec) as compared to that in wild-type littermates, with no detectable differences between genotypes at longer intervals (Figure 3C). (2) LTD at PF-PC synapses has been proposed as a cellular substrate of motor-skill learning in the cerebellum [25]. Simultaneous PF-CF activation induced robust LTD of similar magnitude in PCs of both groups. However, we detected subtle differences in the temporal profile in R552H heterozygotes as compared to wild-types, consistent with faster induction of LTD in the former (Figure 3D).

Vocalizations of Foxp2-R552H Mutants

Finally, prompted by a recent study [26], we investigated innate vocalizations of R552H mutants. Rodents produce three sound types, broadband audible, pure ultrasonic, and broadband click sounds, that differ substantially in physical structure and production mechanisms. In particular, although audible sounds are produced by the vibration of vocal cords, ultrasounds appear to be generated by expiration through a small opening between arytenoid cartilages with otherwise tightly opposed, nonvibrating vocal cords (like a whistle) [27, 28]. Thus, ultrasound emission is likely to require more muscle power due to greater airway resistance.

We initially studied isolation calls. Young pups when isolated from the nest emit frequency-modulated tones in the high ultrasonic range (here called USIs), accompanied by clicks [29]. When comparing R552H heterozygotes to wild-type littermates, we found no significant difference in numbers of USIs produced (Figure 4A) or in their general characteristics (e.g., call duration, peak sound-pressure level, minimum and maximum frequency, and mean number of calls in a series). However, R552H homozygotes did not emit any USIs. Importantly, USIs elicit a phonotaxic approach in adults, a response resembling that of humans toward crying babies. Pup ultrasounds reflect a modulated arousal state yielding altered motor activity, including ultrasound production, rather than a motivation to acoustically communicate [30, 31]. Thus, the absence of homozygous USIs could potentially result from reduced arousal in isolation as compared to wild-type and heterozygous animals.

Figure 4
Vocalizations of Heterozygous and Homozygous R552H Pups

Therefore, we next employed situations yielding higher arousal and stronger efforts to vocalize. When newborns are lifted a short distance above the ground (Supplemental Experimental Procedures), they emit audible distress calls (DCs) with interspersed ultrasounds (here called USDs) and clicks. We compared USDs to USIs in wild-type mice, finding that USDs are louder (higher peak sound-pressure level) and longer (Figure 4B), consistent with greater arousal in the distress condition. R552H homozygotes, heterozygotes, and wild-type littermates emitted equivalent numbers of DCs (Figure 4C), indicating similar arousal in the different groups. All mice also produced USDs (Figure 4C). Thus, in these conditions, R552H homozygotes generate both harmonically structured audible calls and complex ultrasonic whistles, suggesting that neural mechanisms of motor coordination for ultrasound production are intact (Figure 4D).

Nevertheless, R552H homozygotes emitted significantly fewer USDs than did wild-type and heterozygous littermates (Figure 4C). A parsimonious interpretation is that the difficulties of homozygotes in making ultrasounds might be secondary to their severe developmental delays, gross motor difficulties, and/or reduced physical well being. USDs of homozygotes have lower sound-pressure levels and shorter duration than those of heterozygotes and wild-types (Figure 4E). Moreover, R552H homozygotes emit significantly more clicks under distress than do wild-types (Figure 4F). Clicks often precede USDs and so might indicate the intention of mice to produce USDs. Indeed, if numbers of clicks and USDs are summed, the total number of produced sounds is similar in all groups (Figure 4F), concordant with R552H homozygotes' being equivalently aroused under distress but physically less able to produce ultrasounds.

Comparison to Targeted Knockouts

Previously, Shu and colleagues used standard gene-targeting to replace exons 12–13 of Foxp2 with a Neomycin selection cassette [26], yielding knockout mice (referred to here as Foxp2-KOs). Our homozygous mutants show overt similarities to the described Foxp2-KO homozygotes, including reduced weight-gain, delayed righting-reflex maturation, and postnatal lethality. However, Shu et al. reported abnormalities in cerebellar histoarchitecture in Foxp2-KO homozygotes at P15–17; PCs frequently failed to align in a monolayer, and there was continued presence of an external granular layer (EGL) [26]. These observations might reflect an earlier state of cerebellar maturation associated with severe developmental delays. Detailed examination of our various homozygous mutants at P21 indicates a cerebellum with reduced volume but well-preserved histoarchitecture, including normal PC alignment and no persistent EGL (Figure 1D, Figure S4). Moreover, Shu and colleagues emphasized the complete absence of ultrasonic isolation calls made by Foxp2-KO homozygotes [26]. We similarly find no such calls in Foxp2-R552H homozygotes but demonstrate that these mice do produce complex structured ultrasounds in situations involving higher arousal (Figure 4) and suggest that their vocalization problems could be secondary to physical difficulties.

The heterozygous mutants of the present study also display notable differences from Foxp2-KO heterozygotes, which were reported to show moderate developmental delays and abnormal cerebellar histoarchitecture, including retainment of a one-cell-thick EGL at P17 [26]. Our heterozygotes, consistently across the allelic series, are viable and healthy, with normal postnatal weight gain, righting-reflex maturation, baseline motor skills, locomotor activity, and cerebellar size and morphology. In addition, although Foxp2-KO heterozygotes apparently display significantly reduced ultrasound production, with normal call properties [26], we find that Foxp2-R552H heterozygotes produce similar numbers of ultrasounds (whether USIs or USDs) as do wild-type littermates. Rates of ultrasound production follow characteristic strain-specific ontogenetic profiles, closely related to postnatal development [32]. Thus, the reduced USI production seen in Foxp2-KO heterozygotes, but not our Foxp2-R552H heterozygotes, might reflect the fact that only the former display developmental delays.

Overall, our data demonstrate the importance of considering arousal state, developmental delay, and physical well being when one is studying innately-specified vocalizations of mutant/knockout mice. Clearly, the relationship between Foxp2 damage and vocalization changes is more complex than previously proposed [26].

Significance of Foxp2-R552H Mice

There is an emerging consensus that distributed circuits involving the cortex, basal ganglia, and cerebellum play key roles in mediating both motoric and cognitive function [33, 34]. With regard to FOXP2 and speech and language disorders, it has been hypothesized that etiological mutations in this gene affect corticostriatal and corticocerebellar networks that facilitate the learning and production of rapid movement sequences [4] and that might also be important for aspects of language function [33]. Our study represents the first assessment of motor-skill learning and functional properties of relevant circuits in mice carrying Foxp2 disruptions and focuses on a point mutation whose effects have been particularly well studied in humans. We find that Foxp2-R552H heterozygous mice display subtle but highly significant deficits in learning of rapid motor skills during species-typical behaviors. Moreover, we uncover abnormalities in synaptic plasticity in two key sites of conserved Foxp2 expression with established links to motor-skill learning; striatal neurons and cerebellar PCs. These data are consistent with proposals that human speech faculties recruit evolutionarily ancient neural circuits involved in motor learning [33].

The complete lack of LTD in the dorsolateral striatum (putamen) of heterozygous Foxp2-R552H mice is intriguing, given that putamen underactivation was a major finding from functional neuroimaging of heterozygous FOXP2-R553H humans [12]. Delineation of the precise in vivo mechanisms that yield this disturbed synaptic plasticity in mutant mice promises to shed important new light on our understanding of the disorder. Furthermore, our data support recent studies of songbird FoxP2 that similarly indicate that the gene's effects on cognition and behavior go beyond development, to involve “online” roles in striatal neurons [35, 36]. Conditional mice in which Foxp2 can be inactivated in a spatially and temporally selective manner [37] should allow separation of developmental and online functions. Such mice will also be essential for dissecting out relative contributions of striatal and cerebellar dysfunction to motor-skill learning deficits associated with Foxp2 disruption.


We wish to thank R. Hevner (Washington) for Tbr-1 antibodies and Amber Luo for technical assistance. This work was funded by grants from the Wellcome Trust to S.E.F., the British Heart Foundation to K.C., the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EH53/19) to G.E., the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 1097) to J.E. and M.G.B., and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) to J.E. J.P.dB. is funded by the Bristol-Myers Squibb Cardiovascular Prize Fellowship. R.M.J.D. and D.A.K. were supported by a Wellcome Trust grant to the OXION group. S.P. is funded by the Max Planck Society, Germany. M.G. was supported by a Wellcome Trust Award. S.E.F. is a Royal Society Research Fellow.


Published online: March 6, 2008


Experimental Procedures, seven figures, and one table are available at

Supplemental Data

Document S1. Experimental Procedures, Seven Figures, and One Table:


1. Lai C.S., Fisher S.E., Hurst J.A., Vargha-Khadem F., Monaco A.P. A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder. Nature. 2001;413:519–523. [PubMed]
2. Watkins K.E., Dronkers N.F., Vargha-Khadem F. Behavioural analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: comparison with acquired aphasia. Brain. 2002;125:452–464. [PubMed]
3. Fisher S.E., Marcus G.F. The eloquent ape: genes, brains and the evolution of language. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006;7:9–20. [PubMed]
4. Vargha-Khadem F., Gadian D.G., Copp A., Mishkin M. FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;6:131–138. [PubMed]
5. Coghill E.L., Hugill A., Parkinson N., Davison C., Glenister P., Clements S., Hunter J., Cox R.D., Brown S.D. A gene-driven approach to the identification of ENU mutants in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:255–256. [PubMed]
6. Vernes S.C., Nicod J., Elahi F.M., Coventry J.A., Kenny N., Coupe A.M., Bird L.E., Davies K.E., Fisher S.E. Functional genetic analysis of mutations implicated in a human speech and language disorder. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:3154–3167. [PubMed]
7. MacDermot K.D., Bonora E., Sykes N., Coupe A.M., Lai C.S., Vernes S.C., Vargha-Khadem F., McKenzie F., Smith R.L., Monaco A.P., Fisher S.E. Identification of FOXP2 truncation as a novel cause of developmental speech and language deficits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;76:1074–1080. [PubMed]
8. Shu W., Lu M.M., Zhang Y., Tucker P.W., Zhou D., Morrisey E.E. Foxp2 and Foxp1 cooperatively regulate lung and esophagus development. Development. 2007;134:1991–2000. [PubMed]
9. Ferland R.J., Cherry T.J., Preware P.O., Morrisey E.E., Walsh C.A. Characterization of Foxp2 and Foxp1 mRNA and protein in the developing and mature brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003;460:266–279. [PubMed]
10. Lai C.S., Gerrelli D., Monaco A.P., Fisher S.E., Copp A.J. FOXP2 expression during brain development coincides with adult sites of pathology in a severe speech and language disorder. Brain. 2003;126:2455–2462. [PubMed]
11. Watkins K.E., Vargha-Khadem F., Ashburner J., Passingham R.E., Connelly A., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S., Mishkin M., Gadian D.G. MRI analysis of an inherited speech and language disorder: structural brain abnormalities. Brain. 2002;125:465–478. [PubMed]
12. Liegeois F., Baldeweg T., Connelly A., Gadian D.G., Mishkin M., Vargha-Khadem F. Language fMRI abnormalities associated with FOXP2 gene mutation. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:1230–1237. [PubMed]
13. De Bono J.P., Adlam D., Paterson D.J., Channon K.M. Novel quantitative phenotypes of exercise training in mouse models. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2006;290:R926–R934. [PubMed]
14. Buitrago M.M., Schulz J.B., Dichgans J., Luft A.R. Short and long-term motor skill learning in an accelerated rotarod training paradigm. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2004;81:211–216. [PubMed]
15. Middleton F.A., Strick P.L. Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 2000;31:236–250. [PubMed]
16. Costa R.M., Cohen D., Nicolelis M.A. Differential corticostriatal plasticity during fast and slow motor skill learning in mice. Curr. Biol. 2004;14:1124–1134. [PubMed]
17. Akita H., Ogata M., Jitsuki S., Ogura T., Oh-Nishi A., Hoka S., Saji M. Nigral injection of antisense oligonucleotides to synaptotagmin I using HVJ-liposome vectors causes disruption of dopamine release in the striatum and impaired skill learning. Brain Res. 2006;1095:178–189. [PubMed]
18. Dang M.T., Yokoi F., Yin H.H., Lovinger D.M., Wang Y., Li Y. Disrupted motor learning and long-term synaptic plasticity in mice lacking NMDAR1 in the striatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:15254–15259. [PubMed]
19. Calabresi P., Maj R., Pisani A., Mercuri N.B., Bernardi G. Long-term synaptic depression in the striatum: physiological and pharmacological characterization. J. Neurosci. 1992;12:4224–4233. [PubMed]
20. Lovinger D.M., Tyler E.C., Merritt A. Short- and long-term synaptic depression in rat neostriatum. J. Neurophysiol. 1993;70:1937–1949. [PubMed]
21. Gerdeman G.L., Ronesi J., Lovinger D.M. Postsynaptic endocannabinoid release is critical to long-term depression in the striatum. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:446–451. [PubMed]
22. Hashimoto K., Kano M. Postnatal development and synapse elimination of climbing fiber to Purkinje cell projection in the cerebellum. Neurosci. Res. 2005;53:221–228. [PubMed]
23. Zucker R.S., Regehr W.G. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2002;64:355–405. [PubMed]
24. Malenka R.C., Kocsis J.D., Ransom B.R., Waxman S.G. Modulation of parallel fiber excitability by postsynaptically mediated changes in extracellular potassium. Science. 1981;214:339–341. [PubMed]
25. Ito M. The molecular organization of cerebellar long-term depression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;3:896–902. [PubMed]
26. Shu W., Cho J.Y., Jiang Y., Zhang M., Weisz D., Elder G.A., Schmeidler J., De Gasperi R., Sosa M.A., Rabidou D. Altered ultrasonic vocalization in mice with a disruption in the Foxp2 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:9643–9648. [PubMed]
27. Roberts L.H. The rodent ultrasound production mechanism. Ultrasonics. 1975;13:83–88. [PubMed]
28. Sanders I., Weisz D.J., Yang B.Y., Fung K., Amirali A. The mechanism of ultrasonic vocalization in the rat. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2001;27:19.
29. Haack B.M.H., Ehret G. C. C. Thomas; Springfield, Illinois: 1983. Sound communication between parents and offspring.
30. Bell R.W. Ultrasounds in small rodents: arousal-produced and arousal-producing. Dev. Psychobiol. 1974;7:39–42. [PubMed]
31. Ehret G. Infant rodent ultrasounds–a gate to the understanding of sound communication. Behav. Genet. 2005;35:19–29. [PubMed]
32. Branchi I., Santucci D., Alleva E. Ultrasonic vocalisation emitted by infant rodents: a tool for assessment of neurobehavioural development. Behav. Brain Res. 2001;125:49–56. [PubMed]
33. Lieberman P. On the nature and evolution of the neural bases of human language. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2002;119(Suppl 35):36–62. [PubMed]
34. Graybiel A.M. The basal ganglia: learning new tricks and loving it. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005;15:638–644. [PubMed]
35. Haesler S., Rochefort C., Licznerski P., Georgi B., Osten P., Scharff C. Incomplete and Inaccurate Vocal Imitation after Knockdown of FoxP2 in Songbird Basal Ganglia Nucleus Area X. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e321. [PubMed]
36. Teramitsu I., White S.A. FoxP2 regulation during undirected singing in adult songbirds. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:7390–7394. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. French C.A., Groszer M., Preece C., Coupe A.M., Rajewsky K., Fisher S.E. Generation of mice with a conditional Foxp2 null allele. Genesis. 2007;45:440–446. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Matthews J.N., Altman D.G., Campbell M.J., Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990;300:230–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Hansel C., de Jeu M., Belmeguenai A., Houtman S.H., Buitendijk G.H., Andreev D., De Zeeuw C.I., Elgersma Y. AlphaCaMKII Is essential for cerebellar LTD and motor learning. Neuron. 2006;51:835–843. [PubMed]