PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
In Vivo. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 October 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2916688
NIHMSID: NIHMS223059

Small Molecule GS-Nitroxide Ameliorates Ionizing Irradiation-Induced Delay in Bone Wound Healing in a Novel Murine Model

Abstract

We studied radioprotection and mitigation by mitochondrial-targeted Tempol (GS-nitroxide, JP4-039), in a mouse injury/irradiation model of combined injury (fracture/irradiation). Right hind legs of control C57BL/6NHsd female mice, mice pretreated with MnSOD-PL, JP4-039, or with amifostine were irradiated with single and fractionated doses of 0 to 20 Gy. Twenty-four hours later, unicortical holes were drilled into the tibiae of both hind legs; at intervals, tibias were excised, radiographed, and processed for histology. Bone wounds irradiated to 20 or 30 Gy showed delayed healing at 21 to 28 days. Treatment with JP4-039 MnSOD-PL or amifostine, before or after single fraction 20 Gy or during fractionated irradiation followed by drilling accelerated wound healing at days 21 and 28. Orthotopic 3LL tumors were not protected by JP4-039 or amifostine. In nonirradiated mice, pretreatment with JP4-039 accelerated bone wound healing. This test system should be useful for the development of new small molecule radioprotectors.

Keywords: Radioprotectors, antioxidants, nitroxides, bone

The toxic effects of ionizing radiation on bone are of continued interest in radiation oncology. Pediatric oncology patients are at particular risk of long-term side-effects from irradiation of immature bone, including abnormal skeletal maturation, growth retardation, and fracture (17). The higher threshold dose for bone injury in adults is manifested primarily by osteoradionecrosis and fracture (5, 8).

Irradiation of bone leads to depression of mineral metabolism, structural weakness, alteration of bone remodeling, and decreased vascularity (9). In children, growth deformities occur particularly when active growth plates are encompassed within radiation fields such as in the treatment of extremity sarcomas (7, 1011). Prior studies in bone fracture models demonstrated that radiation significantly delays bone wound healing, hypothesized as attributable to damage to bone-regenerating osteoblast precursors in the bone marrow and periosteum (1213).

Some radioprotectors including amifostine (1417) and (MnSOD-PL) (1820) have been reported, and neither of the latter protects tumors (14, 20). Amifostine has been demonstrated in murine models to protect bone from irradiation-induced injury (7, 1011, 1417). Of recent interest is the drug tempol (4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl) which is a stable, free-radical scavenging nitroxide that demonstrates in vivo radioprotective properties, in part by blocking mitochondrial mechanisms of apoptosis (2124). By coupling 4-amino TEMPOL to a segment of the cyclopeptide antibiotic gramicidin S (GS), the nitroxide is targeted to the mitochondria, where scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is increased, thus preventing cell death (24). The alkene peptide isostere GS-segment derived JP4-039 (hemigramicidin S-segment-conjugated 4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperindine-N-oxyl) represents a unique mitochondrial-targeted small molecule GS-nitroxide.

In the present report, we utilized a novel murine combined bone wound-irradiation injury model to assess the effect of JP4-039 on irradiation-induced delay in bone wound healing compared to amifostine and MnSOD-PL.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Mice

Six- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6NHsd mice (20 to 22 g; Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN, USA) were housed according to IACUC protocols at the Hillman Cancer Center – University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. All protocols were approved by the IACUC of the University of Pittsburgh. Veterinary care was provided by the Division of Laboratory Animal Research of the University of Pittsburgh.

Experimental Framework

The first phase of the study examined the effect of single fraction irradiation on bone wound healing. Right hind limbs of mice were irradiated with a single fraction dose of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 Gy. The left hind limbs of all mice were non-irradiated. Twenty-four hours after irradiation, unicortical wounds were created in the proximal tibiae of both hind limbs. Healing of the unicortical wounds was assessed by x-ray at intervals up to 35 days. A full description of irradiation technique, creation of bone wounds, and assessment of bone wound healing is detailed in further sections below.

The second phase of the study examined the roles of amifostine, MnSOD-PL, and JP4-039 as radioprotectors and radiomitigators in the bone wound/irradiation model. Subgroups of mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) with 100 μl MnSOD-PL (100 μg of plasmid DNA in 100 μl water) or 100 μl empty plasmid liposome 24 hours before irradiation, injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 100 μl of amifostine (250 mg/kg as described below) 10 min prior to or immediately after irradiation of the right hind limb, or injected i.p. with 100 μl JP4-039 (10 mg/kg as described below) 10 min prior to or immediately after irradiation of the right hind limb. Irradiation was delivered as a single fraction of 20 Gy.

In a fractionation study, mice were treated with amifostine, MnSOD-PL, or JP4-039 prior to 20 Gy delivered in 4 daily fractions of 5 Gy. In this study, amifostine and JP4-039 were given prior to each fraction in the same manner as above and MnSOD-PL was given prior to the first and third fractions respectively. Twenty-four hours after completion of 20 Gy irradiation, bone wounds were created and healing was assessed. Groups of control mice were treated with each of the test drugs and bone wounds were created without irradiation. Assessment of bone wounds was carried out at a single time point 21 days after irradiation in mice treated with amifostine either before or after irradiation and in those mice given fractionated irradiation.

Another study was designed to assess whether JP4-039 would differentially protect normal tissue and not tumor tissue from irradiation-induced damage using an orthotopic Lewis lung carcinoma, described below.

Tibial bone wounds/bone drilling

This mouse model is based upon a model of tibial wound repair in rats (25). Mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection of phenobarbital (220–250 μl, 1:10 dilution in water, 70 mg/kg). Anesthetized mice were placed supine. Each hind limb was cleaned with alcohol (Kendall, Mansfield, MA, USA), and a 15 mm incision of the skin lateral to the anterior tibial crest was created with surgical scissors. The lateral aspect of each tibia was exposed and carefully cleared of overlying soft tissue. A unicortical osseous wound was created 5 mm below the proximal epiphyseal cartilage plate with a handheld engraving drill (Dremel, Racine, WI, USA) and a 1.6 mm engraving cutter drill bit (Dremel, #113; Racine, WI, USA). Evidence of unicortical osseous wounding was indicated by exposure of the marrow cavity. Irrigation with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 1x, Mediatech, Herndon, VA, USA) was used to remove bone dust and fragments. The soft tissue envelope was reapproximated and the skin was closed with 9 mm stainless steel wound clips (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA).

Radiographs and measurements

Groups of mice were sacrificed at serial 7-day intervals following drilling (i.e. days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 post-drilling) or at 21 days following drilling alone. Radiographs of mice limbs were taken with a 35 kV x-ray machine (MX-20; Faxitron X-ray LLC., Lincolnshire, IL, USA) at × 1.5 magnification. Limbs were positioned with the lateral surface facing the beam. Radiographs (Kodak BioMax XAR, Rochester, NY, USA) were scanned, digitized, and imported into Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The diameter of each wound was measured in triplicate in units of pixels with a ruler tool provided in the software package. Pixels were converted to millimeters (one pixel having been determined to be 1/100 of a millimeter). The triplicate values for each bone were averaged for statistical analysis. Measurement data for the non-irradiated left limbs of mice with irradiated right limbs were included in the non-irradiated groups for analysis.

Drug delivery

MnSOD-PL was injected i.v. as 100 μl of MnSOD plasmid/liposome complex or control blank plasmid/liposome complex containing 100 μg of plasmid DNA (empty plasmid lipose control). JP4-039 was dissolved at a concentration of 2 mg/50 μl cremphor el or 50 μl of ethanol. A volume of 100 μl of the JP4-039 stock solution was diluted 1:9 with water (900 μl). Mice were treated with 100 μl of JP4-039 at a dose of 10 mg/kg via i.p. injection. Amifostine 500 mg per vial was reconstituted with 10 ml of saline and injected at 100 μl per mouse i.p. for a dose of 250 mg/kg.

Irradiation

Radiation was delivered by 6-MV linear accelerator (Varian Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Mice were anesthetized with phenobarbital and right hind limbs immobilized with paper tape within the confines of a 38 × 2 cm irradiation field. One centimeter of tissue-equivalent bolus was added to ensure full dose to the limbs. Initial single fraction experiments used doses of 10–50 Gy prescribed to 100 cm source to bolus distance (SBD) to measure the effect of radiation dose on bone healing. Subsequent phases of the study used 20 Gy (single fraction or fractionated) to the right limb. After irradiation, 24 hours elapsed before tibial drilling, according to IACUC protocols to minimize stress on the animals.

Orthotopic tumors

Orthotopic Lewis lung carcinoma (20) cells were grown in culture and a suspension of 1×107 cells was injected subcutaneously adjacent to the site of planned drilling within the planned irradiation field of the right leg. When tumors achieved a diameter of 2 mm, randomized subgroups of mice were treated with JP4-039, amifostine, or no drug prior to 10 Gy irradiation to the right hind limb. Twenty-four hours after irradiation, holes were drilled in the proximal tibiae of both hind limbs. Another control group of mice had the orthotopic Lewis tumor placed without being irradiated, wounded, or given any drug. Tumor growth was observed and the fold increase in tumor volume was calculated as final tumor volume (day 5) divided by initial tumor volume (day 1, in relation to wound creation).

Histological examination

Excised tibiae were trimmed, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for approximately one week at 4°C, rinsed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, and decalcified in ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA 7.5% 0.1 M cacodylate buffer) for at least 5 weeks with solutions changed every two days the first week, and twice per week thereafter. The bones were embedded in glycol-methacrylate (JB-4; Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Five-μm cross-sections were mounted on Super-Frost slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and were stained with toluidine blue (TB) and for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase enzyme activity (TRAP) in osteoclasts.

Statistical analysis

For the first phase of the study, two-sided two-sample t-tests were used to compare drilled hole size for mice in each radiation dose group (10 Gy, 20 Gy, 30 Gy, 40 Gy, and 50 Gy) with that of the size of the drilled holes in mice in the 0 Gy group at day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 timepoints. For the second phase of the study, one-way ANOVA was performed to test whether the size of drilled holes was statistically the same at day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 timepoints in each of the following treatment groups: 0 Gy, 0 Gy-MnSOD-PL, 0 Gy-JP4-039, 0Gy-empty liposome, 20 Gy, 20 Gy-MnSOD-PL, 20 Gy-JP4-039, 20Gy-empty liposome. Following ANOVA, Tukey’s test, which tests for significant differences between groups, was used to determine the significance of differences between treatment groups.

Results were obtained at 21 days following drilling for groups in a fractionation experiment treated with JP4-039 or amifostine before or after single fraction irradiation and for groups given JP4-039, MnSOD-PL, and amifostine after fractionated irradiation. One-way ANOVA followed by the two-sided two-sample t-test with Bonferroni adjustment was used to analyze these data.

RESULTS

Ionizing irradiation delays tibial bone wound healing

We observed a dose-dependent effect of irradiation over the range of 10–30 Gy in delaying unicortical tibial bone wound healing. The 10 Gy, 20 Gy, and 30 Gy groups were evaluated and compared with non-irradiated controls (Table I). Groups of mice also received doses of 40 Gy or 50 Gy. Those mice had significant soft tissue damage by day 21 such that they were euthanized according to IACUC regulations. At 7 and 14 days post drilling, no significant differences in sizes of the wounds were observed between the 0 Gy group and any of the irradiated groups. At 21 days post-drilling, significant differences were detected for the 20 Gy and 30 Gy groups (mean ± SEM, 0.93 ± 0.37 mm, p=0.008 and 1.07 ± 0.19 mm, p=0.0002, respectively) compared with the 0 Gy group (0.68 ± 0.27 mm). There were significant differences at 28 days post-drilling between the 10 Gy (0.76 ± 0.15 mm, p=0.0003), 20 Gy (0.86 ± 0.34 mm, p=0.04), and 30 Gy (0.76 ± 0.15 mm, p=0.02) groups and the 0 Gy group (0.31 ± 0.33 mm). By day 35, the size of drilled holes in all groups was reduced below the sensitivity for analysis of wound size differences.

Table I
Irradiation-induced delay in healing of unicortical osseous wounds in mouse tibiae

JP4-039 ameliorates irradiation-induced delay in bone wound healing

The effects of antioxidants JP4-039 and MnSOD-PL on bone wound healing were evaluated when administered prior to irradiation (Table II). Comparison of the groups exposed to 20 Gy, 20 Gy-MnSOD, and 20 Gy-JP4-039 revealed no differences in hole size at days 7 or 14 post drilling. Significant amelioration of irradiation delay of bone wound healing was observed at day 21 post drilling in both the 20 Gy-JP4-039 group (mean ± SEM, 0.51 ± 0.05 mm, p<0.05) and the 20 Gy-MnSOD-PL (0.68 ± 0.07 mm, p<0.05) group, compared with the 20 Gy group (1.01 ± 0.10 mm). At 28 days post-drilling, significant differences in hole diameter were detected for the 20 Gy-JP4-039 group (0.37 ± 0.04 mm, p<0.05) and 20 Gy-MnSOD-PL group (0.49 + 0.02 mm, p<0.05), compared with the 20 Gy group (0.76 ± 0.13 mm).

Table II
Small molecule GS-nitroxide JP4-039 or MnSOD-PL ameliorate irradiation-induced delay in unicortical osseous murine tibiae wound healing

JP4-039 Stimulates bone wound healing in the absence of irradiation

Comparison of the non-irradiated groups (0 Gy alone, 0 Gy-MnSOD-PL, 0 Gy-JP4-039) revealed no significant differences in hole diameters at day 7 following drilling. At day 14, significant differences were detected in comparisons between either the 0 Gy-JP4-039 (0.55 ± 0.03 mm, p<0.05) or 0 Gy-MnSOD-PL (0.49 ± 0.05 mm, p<0.05) and the 0 Gy alone group (0.84 ± 0.05mm) (Table II). At 21 days post-drilling, a therapeutic effect of MnSOD-PL and JP4-039 was detected (0 Gy-MnSOD-PL: 0.41 ± 0.04 mm, JP4-039: 0.47 + 0.04 mm, versus 0 Gy alone: 0.64 ± 0.05 mm, p<0.05). No significant differences were observed between MnSOD-PL or JP4-039 treatment compared with control irradiation groups at 28 days post drilling.

JP4-039 Mitigates irradiation induced delay in bone wound healing

Mice treated with JP4-039 or amifostine after irradiation showed a statistically significant improvement in bone wound healing (Table III). Bone wound healing in this cohort was assessed at 21 days post drilling. When treated prior to 20 Gy irradiation, mice given JP4-039 (0.57 ± 0.04 mm, p<0.001) or amifostine (0.73 ± 0.01 mm, p<0.001) both demonstrated statistically significant decreases in bone wound size compared with controls (1.06 ± 0.02 mm). Statistically significant radiomitigation was demonstrated for groups given JP4-039 (0.52 ± 0.01mm, p<0.001) or amifostine (0.79 ± 0.02mm, p<0.001) after irradiation, compared with the control irradiated group (1.06 ± 0.02mm). JP4-039 improved bone healing to a greater extent than amifostine when administration prior to or following irradiation (Table III).

Table III
JP4-039 and amifostine are effective mitigators of irradiation-induced delay in bone wound healing

JP4-039 Ameliorates fractionated irradiation-induced delay in bone wound healing

Effects of treatments were similar for mice given fractionated irradiation (Table IV). At day 21 post-drilling, both the irradiated and non-irradiated limbs in the three treatment subgroups (JP4-039, MnSOD-PL, and amifostine) had significant reduction in tibial wound size compared with the respective control limbs.

Table IV
JP4-039, MnSOD-PL, and amifostine are effective as protectors against irradiation damage to tibial wound healing during fractionated irradiation

Orthotopic tumors are not protected from irradiation by JP4-039 or amifostine

Neither JP4-039 nor amifostine altered the effect of irradiation to reduce growth of orthotopic Lewis lung carcinoma (Figure 4). For the irradiated hind limb, the fold increase in tumor volume was significantly reduced in all treatment groups compared with non-irradiated controls (Figure 4A). For the non-irradiated hind limb, only the group that received JP4-039 followed by 10 Gy irradiation of the other leg showed significant reduction in tumor growth compared with controls; however, all treatment groups showed a reduction in increase of tumor volume compared with the control group (Figure 4B).

Figure 4
Absence of protection of orthotopic tumor by JP4-039 treatment of irradiated mouse tibial wound

Radiographic and histologic evidence of bone wound healing

Representative radiographs of proximal tibiae from the 0 Gy, 20 Gy, 20 Gy-MnSOD-PL, and 20 Gy-JP4-039 groups reveal the effects of time and treatment on bone wound healing (Figure 1). Radiographs in the 0 Gy group demonstrated a decrease in wound size. In contrast, wounds in 20 Gy irradiated bones remained radiolucent through 28 days. Radiographs of bones from 20 Gy irradiated mice which had been pre-treated with MnSOD-PL or JP4-039 demonstrated persistence of holes though day 21, with healing by day 28.

Figure 1
Radiographs of drilled tibia at various time points for the 0 Gy, 20 Gy, 20 Gy-MnSOD, and 20 Gy-JP4-039 groups

Histopathological evaluation of controls indicated that tibial wounds spontaneously healed, with complete bridging with new bone by 35 days (Figure 2). Specimens from mice with irradiation of limbs prior to wounding revealed more fibrous tissue than reactive bone in the wounds (Figure 3). Specimens from animals that were pre-treated with JP4-039 or MnSOD-PL revealed new bone formation compared with specimens from irradiated mice (Figure 3). These histological findings confirm the irradiation-induced delay in bone wound healing and the ameliorating effect of JP4-039.

Figure 2
Photomicrographs of A: intact tibia, B: tibia after creation of unicortical tibial wound, and C: tibia 35 days after creation of tibial wound
Figure 3
Photomicrographs of tibiae 14 days after creation of wounds in mice with A: 20 Gy irradiation; B: 20 Gy irradiation and pretreatment with JP4-039; and C: 20 Gy irradiation and pretreatment with MnSOD-PL

DISCUSSION

The pathophysiology of fracture healing and the effects of irradiation on the process are complex. A hematoma/fibrinous clot first forms, followed by ischemia and inflammation (2627). Local growth factors recruit polymorphonuclear cells, macrophages, mast cells, and mesenchymal stem cells to the fracture site. Osteoblastic precursors are also systemically mobilized through the peripheral circulation and home to the fracture site, where they undergo migration, proliferation, and differentiation (2832). Subsequent stages in fracture healing include cartilage formation, calcification, angiogenesis, bone formation, and bone remodeling (26). Irradiation alters the process of bone repair (3335) including loss of osteocytes and osteoblasts, hyaline necrosis of blood vessels, and replacement of bone marrow by fibrous connective tissue (12). Irradiation may also impair bone healing by reducing the proliferation of bone-regenerating precursor cells located in the bone marrow (8). Vascular injury from irradiation may impair bone healing by reducing angiogenesis at sites of new bone formation (8), because endochondrial ossification is known to be dependent on adequate vascularity (30). Pediatric oncology patients carry a great risk of irradiation-induced bone toxicity and the severity is dependent on dose, volume irradiated, location, and age (67).

The generation of ROS in the bone environment leads to the formation and activation of osteoclasts and to subsequent bone resorption (3132). The oxidative stress produced by fracture not only occurs in the immediate inflammatory period, but rather endures for at least one month following fracture (32). Irradiation also increases osteoclast numbers in vivo and in vitro (3132). The combination of fracture and irradiation creates a pool of free radicals that inhibit proliferation of osteoblast progenitors and that stimulate osteoclast proliferation, which can further impair bone wound healing.

Radioprotectors of bone have been described in the literature. Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 led to more rapid healing of bone defects in rat calvaria irradiated with 12 Gy prior to creation of the defect (33). Amifostine at 300 mg/kg 20 minutes prior to 35 Gy delivered as a single fraction to the right orbitozygomatic complex improved bone healing (34). Reduction in radiation toxicity for craniofacial bone was seen when amifostine preceded fractionated radiation to the same dose of 35Gy (35), as well as for long bones (1617). Beneficial effects of other antioxidants and ROS scavengers in fracture healing have been reported. Daily injections of vitamin C mitigated the damaging effect of 5 days of i.p. injections of zymosan on fracture healing (36) and more rapid bone healing was observed in dogs given vitamin E daily for one week following radial diaphysis fracture (37).

We have developed a novel model to assess the effectiveness of new radioprotectors and mitigators on the radiation-induced bone healing delay. Use of the model showed that a new GS-derived nitroxide drug (JP4-039), as well as MnSOD-PL and amifostine, were effective radioprotectors and radiomitigators of bone wound healing in both single fraction and fractionated irradiation protocols. It is clinically important that JP4-039 did not protect orthotopic Lewis lung carcinoma tumors from irradiation-induced suppression of growth. Furthermore, there was apparent stimulation of bone wound healing by JP4-039, MnSOD-PL, and amifostine, even in the absence of irradiation. Because both irradiation and bone wounding result in the production of ROS, scavenging of these free radicals by the antioxidant drugs presumably resulted in improved bone healing in the presence or absence of irradiation.

Using a novel murine model of combined bone wound/irradiation injury, we report amelioration of irradiation-induced delay of bone wound healing by a novel GS-derived-nitroxide peptide isostere JP4-039, amifostine, and MnSOD-PL. These antioxidants and intracellular ROS scavengers also stimulated bone wound healing in the absence of irradiation. This murine model should be of value in testing new small molecule radioprotectors and radiomitigators in the setting of bone injury.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIAID/NIH Grant U19A1068021 and BARDA Contract HHSO10200800062C.

Footnotes

Presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Radiation Oncology

References

1. Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Scott WW. Skeletal complications of radiation therapy. Radiographics. 1994;14:111–121. [PubMed]
2. Brown RK, Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Peschel RE, Panjabi MM. Postfracture irradiation effects on biomechanical histologic parameters of fracture healing. J Ortho Res. 1991;9:876–882. [PubMed]
3. Dawson WB. Growth impairment following radiotherapy in childhood. Clin Radiol. 1968;19:241–256. [PubMed]
4. Mitchell MJ, Logan ML. Radiation-induced changes in bone. Radiographics. 1998;18:1125–1136. [PubMed]
5. Williams HJ, Davies AM. The effect of x-rays on bone: a pictorial review. Euro Radiol. 2006;16:619–633. [PubMed]
6. Roebuck DJ. Skeletal complications in pediatric oncology patients. Radiographics. 1999;4:873–885. [PubMed]
7. Spadaro JA, Horton JA, Margulies BS, Luther J, Strauss JA, Farnum CE, Damron TA. Radioprotectant combinations spare radiation-induced damage to the physis more than fractionation alone. Int J Radiat Biol. 2005;81:759–765. [PubMed]
8. Lerouxel E, Moreau A, Bouler JM, Giumelli B, Daculsi G, Weiss P, Malard O. Effects of high doses of ionizing radiation on the bone in rates: A new model for evaluation of bone engineering. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47(8):602–607. [PubMed]
9. Maeda M, Bryant MH, Yamagata M, Li G, Earle JD, Chao EY. Effects of irradiation on cortical bone and their time related changes. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70:392–299. [PubMed]
10. Damron TA, Spadaro JA, Tamurian RM, Damron LA. Sparing of radiation-induced damage to the physis: fractionation alone compared to amifostine pretreatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1067–1071. [PubMed]
11. Damron TA, Margulies B, Biskup D, Spadaro JA. Amifostine before fractionated irradiation protects bone growth in rats better than fractionation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:479–483. [PubMed]
12. Arnold M, Kummermehr J, Trott KR. Radiation-induced impairment of osseus healing: quantitative studies using a standard drilling defect in rat femur. Radiat Res. 1995;143:77–84. [PubMed]
13. Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE. The Nicolas Andry Award-1995. Fracture healing radiation induced alterations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;341:267–282. [PubMed]
14. Andreassen CN, Grau C, Lindegaard JC. Chemical radioprotection: a critical review of amifostine as a cytoprotector in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;12:62–72. [PubMed]
15. Gevorgyan A, La Scala GC, Neligan PC, Pang CY, Forrest CR. Radioprotection of craniofacial bone growth. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18:995–1000. [PubMed]
16. Spadaro JA, Baesl MT, Conta AC, Margulies BM, Damron TA. Effects of irradiation on the appositional and longitudinal growth of the tibia and fibula of the rat with and without radioprotectant. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:35–40. [PubMed]
17. Damron TA, Spadaro JA, Horton JA, Margulies BS, Strauss JA, Farnum CE. Novel radioprotectant drugs for sparing radiation-induced damage to the physis. Int J Radiat Bio. 2004;80:217–228. [PubMed]
18. Epperly MW, Wegner R, Kanai AJ, Kagan VE, Greenberger EE, Nie S, Greenberger JS. Effects of MnSOD-plasmid liposome gene therapy on antioxidant levels in irradiated murine oral cavity orthotopic tumors. Radiat Res. 2007;167:289–297. [PubMed]
19. Epperly MW, Gretton JE, Bernarding M, Nie S, Rasul B, Greenberger JS. Mitochondrial localization of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/ZnSOD) confers radioprotective functions in vitro and in vivo. Radiat Res. 2003;160:568–578. [PubMed]
20. Guo H, Epperly MW, Bernarding M, Nie S, Gretton J, Jefferson M, Greenberger JS. Manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome (MnSOD-PL) intratracheal gene therapy reduction of irradiation-induced inflammatory cytokines does not protect orthotopic Lewis lung carcinomas. In Vivo. 2003;17:13–21. [PubMed]
21. Cotrim AP, Hyodo F, Matsumoto KI, Sowers AC, Cook JA, Baum BJ, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB. Differential radiation protection of salivary glands versus tumor by tempol with accompanying tissue assessment of tempol by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4928–4933. [PubMed]
22. Soule BP, Hyodo F, Matsumoto KI, Simone NL, Cook JA, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB. The chemistry and biology of nitroxide compounds. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;42:1632–1650. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Hahn SM, Tochner Z, Krishna CM, Glass J, Wilson L, Samuni A, Sprague M, Venzon D, Glatstein E, Mitchell JB, Russo A. Tempol, a stable free radical is a novel murine radiation protector. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1750–1753. [PubMed]
24. Jiang J, Belikova NA, Hoye AT, Zhao Q, Epperly MW, Greenberger JS, Wipf P, Kagan VE. A mitochondria-targeted nitroxide/hemigramicidin S conjugate protects mouse embryonic cells against gamma irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:816–825. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Arnold M, Kummermehr J, Trott KR. Radiation-induced impairment of osseus healing: quantitative studies using a standard drilling defect in rat femur. Radiat Res. 1995;143:77–84. [PubMed]
26. Phillips AM. Overview of the fracture healing cascase. Injury. 2005;365:S5–S7. [PubMed]
27. Steinman C. The healing of drill-hole defects in the long bones of adult rabbits, especially following the use of embryonic bone transplants. Anat Rec. 1947;99:427–445. [PubMed]
28. Kwong FNK, Harris MB. Recent developments in the biology of fracture repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:619–625. [PubMed]
29. Campbell TM, Wong WT, Mackie EJ. Establishment of a model of cortical bone repair in mice. Calcif Tissue Int. 2003;73:49–55. [PubMed]
30. Chan CKF, Chen CC, Luppen CA, Kim JB, DeBoer AT, Wei K, Helms JA, Kuo CJ, Kraft DL, Weissman IL. Endochondral ossification is required for hematopoietic stem-cell niche formation. Nature. 2009;457:490–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Garrett IR, Boyce BF, Oreffo RO, Bonewald L, Poser J, Mundy GR. Oxygen-derived free radicals stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption in rodent bone in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:632–639. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Yeler H, Tahtabas F, Canden F. Investigation of oxidative stress during fracture healing in the rats. Cell Biochem Funct. 2005;23:137–139. [PubMed]
33. Wurzler KK, DeWeese TL, Sebald W, Reddi AH. Radiation-induced impairment of bone healing can be overcome by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Craniofac Surg. 1998;9:131–137. [PubMed]
34. Forrest CR, O’Donovan DA, Yeung I, Zeman V, LaScala G, Neligan PC, Pang CY. Efficacy of radioprotection in the prevention of radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1311–1323. [PubMed]
35. La Scala GC, O’Donovan DA, Yeung I, Darko J, Addison PD, Neligan PC, Pang CY, Forrest CR. Radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition: efficacy of cytoprotection following a fractionated dose regimen. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1973–1985. [PubMed]
36. Duygulu F, Yakan B, Karaoglu S, Kutlubay R, Karahan O, Ozturk A. The effect of zymosan and the protective effect of various antioxidants on fracture healing in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:493–501. [PubMed]
37. Durmus AS, Akpolat N, Unsaldi E. Effect of DL-alpha-tocopheral-acetate on the fracture healing of experimental radial diaphysis fracture in dogs. Firat Univ J Health Sci. 2008;22:141–146.