PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Am J Manag Care. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 5.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2916649
NIHMSID: NIHMS220550

Delayed radiotherapy for breast cancer patients in integrated delivery systems

Heather Taffet Gold, PhD, Soe Soe Thwin, PhD, Diana SM Buist, PhD, MPH, Terry S Field, DSc, Feifei Wei, PhD, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, DSc, MPH, Timothy L. Lash, DSc, Virginia Quinn, PhD, Ann M Geiger, PhD, and Rebecca A Silliman, MD, PhD, for the BOW Investigators

Abstract

Objective

To identify factors associated with delayed radiotherapy (RT) in older women with early stage breast cancer.

Methods

We studied 541 women ages 65+ diagnosed with early stage breast cancer from 1990–1994 at five integrated healthcare delivery systems and treated with breast conserving surgery and RT, but not chemotherapy. We examined whether demographic, tumor, or treatment characteristics were associated with RT delays of >8 weeks post-surgery using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Seventy-six women (14%) had delayed RT, with a median delay of 14 weeks. Non-white and Hispanic women were much more likely than White women to have delayed RT (OR=3.3, 95%CI: 1.7, 10) in multivariable analyses that controlled for demographic and clinical variables.

Conclusions

Of women receiving BCS and radiation in this cohort, 14% experienced delayed RT, even though they had insurance and access to care in integrated delivery systems. Women receiving delayed care were more likely to be non-White and Hispanic. Timely RT should be facilitated through physician and patient education, navigation, and notification programs to improve quality of care. Future research should examine modifiable barriers to RT timeliness and whether delays impact long-term outcomes.

Keywords: breast cancer, radiotherapy, socioeconomic status, integrated delivery system

Breast cancer, diagnosed in 180,000 women in the United States in 2008 (1), is usually treated with mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without radiotherapy (RT)(2) Treatment characteristics vary by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic region, healthcare access, and insurance status (38). Quality of care, including timing and completeness of RT and chemotherapy, can affect recurrence and survival rates (913). The start of RT is time sensitive, yet many factors can affect whether a patient experiences a delayed start. If she has positive nodes, she may be more likely to have longer discussions about treatment options because more options are available (2). As breast cancer treatment requires extensive coordination of care across multiple providers and specialties, patients may experience difficulties navigating the healthcare system (14). Typical treatment starts with surgery and lymph node assessment, followed by recovery time after surgery, subsequent RT to the whole breast for 5–6 weeks, and a 1-week RT boost to the tumor bed (2). Positive lymph nodes are an indication for chemotherapy prior to or concurrent with RT (2).

There is conflicting evidence regarding the optimal timing of RT following BCS (11;1519). One study suggests that RT delay does not negatively affect breast-cancer-related health outcomes (19), but most have found a negative impact (11;1518). A systematic review concluded that RT delay was associated with higher rates of local recurrence (17). RT delay may also be associated with psychological distress and anxiety, which can negatively impact the care process and outcomes (20).

This study assesses patient-level predictors of delayed RT in an insured population of older women with early stage breast cancer treated in integrated healthcare delivery systems, a group that has not been studied for its timeliness in receiving RT.

Data and Methods

This study is nested in the Breast Cancer Treatment Effectiveness in Older Women (BOW) Study cohort (21). We included 541 women ages 65+ diagnosed with unilateral, early-stage breast cancer (American Joint Commission on Cancer [AJCC](22) Stages I or II) enrolled in five integrated delivery systems in the Cancer Research Network, a collaborative group of research programs, enrolled populations, and data systems of 14 health systems nationwide (23). Women diagnosed from 1990–1994 were followed for 10 years. All subjects in this nested cohort received BCS with a full course of whole breast RT, but no chemotherapy. Subjects from the original cohort receiving BCS without RT (23%) or mastectomy (53%) were excluded (21). We restricted the sample to women not receiving chemotherapy to eliminate variations in RT timing related to chemotherapy sequencing. We used automated administrative databases, medical record review, and tumor registries to ascertain age, race/ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index (24), lymph node status, tumor size, histology, estrogen or progesterone receptor (ER, PR) status, and any use of tamoxifen. To calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index, information on comorbid conditions was collected from medical records for all health care services for one year prior to diagnosis. This index includes 18 conditions weighted to predict mortality. We excluded cancer diagnoses from the index and categorized the remaining score as 0, 1, or 2+. Because others have shown that an 8-week delay can impact health outcomes, we defined RT delay as starting RT >8 weeks following BCS, based on medical record data (11;17). All research was conducted following approval from local institutional review boards (IRBs) and in accordance with the ethical standards of the local IRBs.

We calculated the percentage of women with delayed RT and the percentage with timely RT by demographic and clinical characteristics. We used chi-squared tests and fit multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with delayed RT; we controlled for integrated delivery system site.

Results

The sample included 541 women, of whom 76 (14%) had a delay of more than 8 weeks (Figure 1). Among women with RT delayed >8 weeks, the median delay was 14 weeks, and 21 subjects (4%) had delays >12 weeks. More than two-thirds of the sample was <75 years, and few (3.3%) scored >1 on the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Almost 7% were ER-/PR-, and 13% of subjects had positive nodes (Table 1). In multivariable analyses (Table 2), women of non-White race or Hispanic ethnicity had significantly higher odds of delayed RT (OR=3.3, 95%CI: 1.7, 10). We had limited precision in general, as indicated by some wide confidence intervals (e.g., tumor size >2cm (OR=1.9, 95% CI 0.9, 4.1) and ER-/PR- status (OR=1.8, 95%CI 0.7, 4.9)).

Figure 1
Distribution of Radiotherapy Timing Post-breast-conserving Surgery, Percentage of Subjects by Number of Weeks between BCS and Radiotherapy (n=541)
Table 1
Characteristics of women aged ≥65 years with early stage breast cancer who received breast conserving surgery with radiation therapy, by timely or delayed radiation therapy,* n=541
Table 2
Odds of Radiotherapy Being Delayed >8 Weeks following Definitive Breast Conserving Surgery, Multivariable Results, n=541

Discussion

In this fully-insured population of older women with breast cancer who had access to integrated delivery systems, about 1 in 7 women experienced delayed RT following BCS, a rate similar to other studies (11;17). Surprisingly, in this population, the proportion with RT delays >8 weeks was about the same as that found in a fee-for-service Medicare population (14% vs. 16%, respectively)(11). One might expect better coordinated, and therefore less delayed, care in integrated healthcare delivery systems, yet such delays >8 weeks may be due to healthcare access issues such as transportation problems, language concordance or communication issues, or limited patient knowledge about the importance of timely RT, all barriers that are not mediated by insurance status. Alternatively delays may be caused by poor care coordination by clinicians and the healthcare system or patient-related barriers, concerns, or anxiety regarding decision-making and treatment itself (20;25;26).

The only predictor of delayed RT was non-White and Hispanic race/ethnicity, consistent with previous research (11;18). Indeed, delayed RT, which may represent uncoordinated care among other possible factors, was not affected significantly by other included clinical or demographic factors. Whether these delays in turn affect mortality for patients in integrated delivery systems could not be shown due to statistical power limitations.

All eligible women were included in our study population, and we had no loss to follow-up in the treatment period. This design advantage substantially limits the potential for selection bias. Another strength of this study is that all subjects in the cohort had equal access to complete treatment by having access to care in an integrated healthcare delivery system. In addition to sociodemographic information (beyond age), we had important information about the tumors themselves that helped explain treatment receipt and reduced confounding in our analyses. Nonetheless, we did not have information on characteristics such as patient educational attainment, income, transportation availability, radiation oncologist availability, language barriers, or preferences for care; doctor-patient communication; or healthcare system programs, such as care coordination, which may be greater barriers to or facilitators of care for older women diagnosed with breast cancer (14;25). We do know, however, that non-White women and those of Hispanic ethnicity are more likely to be of lower socioeconomic status (27), however, and therefore these factors may directly or indirectly influence care-seeking behavior and receipt. All subjects had Medicare coverage in these healthcare systems with the same benefits for RT and Medicare paying for RT in inpatient, outpatient, and freestanding clinics. Outpatient RT requires a set copayment, which was usually lower than fee-for-service copayments, thereby reducing barriers to care even more. It is unlikely that coverage levels affected timeliness of RT.

We have shown that healthcare access, as reflected by a patient’s membership in an integrated healthcare delivery system, does not in itself ensure timely therapy. Rates of RT delay were similar between integrated delivery systems and the fee-for-service sector (11) and appear to be affected by race/ethnicity. Healthcare delivery systems and providers should consider targeting care coordination efforts to traditionally underserved patients to improve timeliness of RT.

Summary

This study identified factors associated with delayed radiotherapy for breast cancer in integrated healthcare delivery systems; 14% experienced delayed RT, even though they had insurance.

Nontechnical Summary

This study identified factors associated with delayed radiotherapy for breast cancer in integrated healthcare delivery systems; 14% experienced delayed RT, even though they had insurance and access to care.

  • Women receiving delayed care were more likely to be non-White and Hispanic.
  • Timely RT should be facilitated through physician and patient education, navigation, and notification programs to improve quality of care. In addition, queues for radiotherapy appointments should be evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure adequate access.
  • Future research should examine modifiable barriers to RT timeliness and whether delays impact long-term outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Funded by the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA093772, R Silliman, PI) and in part by the American Cancer Society (MRSGT-04-002-01-CPHPS, HT Gold, PI).

Contributor Information

Heather Taffet Gold, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College.

Soe Soe Thwin, Boston University Medical Center.

Diana SM Buist, Group Health Center for Health Studies.

Terry S Field, Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts, Fallon Clinic, Fallon Community Health Plan.

Feifei Wei, HealthPartners Research Foundation.

Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Henry Ford Health System and Yale University School of Medicine.

Timothy L. Lash, Boston University Medical Center.

Virginia Quinn, Kaiser Permanente-Southern California.

Ann M Geiger, Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

Rebecca A Silliman, Boston University Medical Center.

References

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. [Accessed 7-14-2008]. www.cancer.org.
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. Dec 22008. [Accessed 5-13-2009]. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf V.1.2009.
3. Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, Gilligan MA. Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001;93:1344–46. [PubMed]
4. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;326:1102–7. [PubMed]
5. Gold HT, Dick AW. Variations in treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in elderly women. Medical Care. 2004;42:267–75. [PubMed]
6. Ballard-Barbash R, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Nayfield SG, Kessler LG. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1996;88:716–26. [PubMed]
7. Bickell NA. Race, ethnicity, and disparities in breast cancer: victories and challenges. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12:238–51. [PubMed]
8. Riley GF, Potosky AL, Klabunde CN, Warren JL, Ballard-Barbash R. Stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns among older women with breast cancer: An HMO and fee-for-service comparison. JAMA. 1999;281:720–726. [PubMed]
9. Du XL, Fang S, Meyer TE. Impact of treatment and socioeconomic status on racial disparities in survival among older women with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:125–32. [PubMed]
10. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2002;94:490–496. [PubMed]
11. Gold HT, Do HT, Dick AW. Correlates and effect of suboptimal radiotherapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;113:3108–15. [PubMed]
12. Hershman D, McBride R, Jacobson JS, Lamerato L, Roberts K, Grann VR, et al. Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6639–46. [PubMed]
13. Lash TL, Silliman RA, Guadagnoli E, Mor V. The effect of less than definitive care on breast carcinoma recurrence and mortality. Cancer. 2000;89:1739–47. [PubMed]
14. Bickell NA, Young GJ. Coordination of care for early-stage breast cancer patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2001;16:737–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Buchholz TA, Austin-Seymour MM, Moe RE, Ellis GK, Livingston RB, Pelton JG, et al. Effect of delay in radiation in the combined modality treatment of breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. 1993;26:23–35. [PubMed]
16. Hebert-Croteau N, Freeman CR, Latreille J, Rivard M, Brisson J. A population-based study of the impact of delaying radiotherapy after conservative surgery for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment. 2004;88:187–96. [PubMed]
17. Huang J, Barbera L, Brouwers M, Browman G, Mackillop WJ. Does Delay in Starting Treatment Affect the Outcomes of Radiotherapy? A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2003;21:555–63. [PubMed]
18. Hershman DL, Wang X, McBride R, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Delay in initiating adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conservation surgery and its impact on survival. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2006;65:1353–60. [PubMed]
19. Benchalal M, de Lafontan B, Berton-Rigaud D, Belkacemi Y, Romestaing P, Peignaux K, et al. Influence of the time between surgery and radiotherapy on local recurrence in patients with lymph node-positive, early-stage, invasive breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2005;104:240–250. [PubMed]
20. Brintzenhofe-Szoc KM, Levin TT, Li Y, Kissane DW, Zabora JR. Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: prevalence by cancer type. Psychosomatics. 2009;50:383–91. [PubMed]
21. Enger SM, Thwin SS, Buist DSM, Field T, Frost F, Geiger AM, et al. Breast Cancer Treatment of Older Women in Integrated Health Care Settings. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:4377–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE. AJCC cancer staging manual. 5. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.
23. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, Field TS, Fletcher S, Geiger AM, et al. Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005:3–11. [PubMed]
24. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40:373–83. [PubMed]
25. Bickell NA, Shastri K, Fei K, Oluwole S, Godfrey H, Hiotis K, et al. A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1717–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Bickell NA, Cohen A. Understanding reasons for underuse: an approach to improve quality and reduce disparities in breast cancer treatment. Mt Sinai J Med. 2008;75:23–30. [PubMed]
27. Webster BH, Bishaw A. US Census Bureau; US Government Printing Office; 2007. [Accessed 8-21-2009]. American Community Survey Reports: Income, Earnings, and Poverty Data From the 2006 American Community Survey; pp. 1–40. http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/acs-08.pdf.