PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jprJournal of Parasitology Research
 
J Parasitol Res. 2009; 2009: 375493.
Published online 2009 June 28. doi:  10.1155/2009/375493
PMCID: PMC2915645

Porcine Cysticercosis in Southeast Uganda: Seroprevalence in Kamuli and Kaliro Districts

Abstract

The recent recognition of neurocysticercosis as a major cause of epilepsy in Uganda and changes in pig demography have lead to a need to better understand the basic epidemiology of Taenia solium infections in pigs and humans. Human exposure is a function of the size of the animal reservoir of this zoonosis. This is the first field survey for porcine cysticercosis to investigate the prevalence of antigen-positive pigs across an entire rural district of south-east Uganda. In our field surveys, 8.6% of 480 pigs screened were seropositive for the parasite by B158/B60 Ag-ELISA. In addition, of the 528 homesteads surveyed 138 (26%) did not have pit latrines indicating a high probability of pigs having access to human faeces and thus T. solium eggs. This study thus indicates the need for better data on this neglected zoonotic disease in Uganda, with a particular emphasis on the risk factors for infection in both pigs and humans. In this regard, further surveys of pigs, seroprevalence surveys in humans and an understanding of cysticercosis-related epilepsy are required, together with risk-factor studies for human and porcine infections.

1. Introduction

Pig-keeping and pork consumption in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) are rising rapidly [1] as demand for pork increases and rural and peri-urban families discover pig farming to be profitable and cost effective [2]. In Uganda, the establishment of piggeries and increased pig production by rural farmers is encouraged by government and forms a part of central government agricultural planning [3]. In some instances, local governments are supplying piglets to rural families in order to promote an alternative source of income. Pigs are considered low-input livestock which, as accomplished scavengers, can grow to market size on minimal feed inputs from the farmer. Humans serve as the definitive host of the zoonotic helminth parasite Taenia solium, harbouring the adult tapeworm (infection termed taeniosis), which is acquired through the consumption of under-cooked pork (the larval cysticerci in the consumed pork develop into adult tapeworms in the human gut). Pigs acquire larval T. solium infection (infection termed cysticercosis) by ingestion of T. solium eggs passed in human faeces (i.e., coprophagy). Humans may also be infected with cysticercosis from ingestion of T. solium eggs through faecal-oral contamination. If cysts form in human brain tissue, a neurological disorder known as neurocysticercosis results; this commonly manifests as epileptic seizures [4]. Cysticercosis is acquired in settings with poor household and/or personal hygiene and thus can be acquired by both pork eaters and nonpork eaters; T. solium is emerging as a serious agricultural and public health problem in the ESA region [5].

In eastern Africa, the disease has been reported in Tanzania [6], Kenya [2], Uganda [7], Burundi [8, 9] and Rwanda [10], though it is known to be substantially under-reported in both humans and pigs. Epidemiological field research is required for improving our understanding of both the prevalence and risk factors of this parasitic disease, while also investigating the transmission dynamics [11, 12]. The aim of the present work is to determine the prevalence of cysticercosis among domestic pigs by B158/B60 Ag-ELISA in the districts of Kamuli and Kaliro, south-east Uganda, to provide baseline information on the level of exposure in this region. Anecdotally, Kamuli is known to be a source of pig meat for the burgeoning demand of urban Kampala, the capital city, and consumption of pork meat amongst the local population is also extensive. There have been no recent epidemiological studies on human taeniasis, human cysticercosis or porcine cysticercosis in Uganda; assessing the infection rate in the pig population has been shown to be a good indicator of T. solium risk to humans [13].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Kamuli and Kaliro districts in Uganda were chosen for the study as pig keeping is known to have become popular in these districts. Kaliro was formally part of Kamuli District (until 2005 when it became a district in its own right). The study area had an estimated pig population of 25,860, as determined from the 2003-2004 Agricultural Census conducted by the District Veterinary Office (DVO) with a spatial distribution as shown in Figure 1. The pigs can best be described as the local breeds; the percentages of the cross breeds cannot be estimated with certainty since there are no breeding records kept. The field survey reported here was carried out in October–December 2005.

Figure 1
Pig population of the study area (Kamuli and Kaliro districts). Data from the District Veterinary Office, Kamuli (survey undertaken in 2003-2004).

2.2. Cross-Sectional Sampling

Previous studies elsewhere in East Africa have found a prevalence of cysticercosis infection among pigs in some areas to be around 20% [2, 6]; no such studies have previously been published for our study area. The sample size for a cross-sectional survey to estimate prevalence was calculated based on random sampling of pigs and inflated to account for the uncertainty and multi-stage design [14]. With an expected prevalence of 20%, an accepted error of 5% and 95% confidence interval, the minimum number to sample was 246 pigs, which, doubled, was 492, rounded to 500. We aimed to sample pigs in every parish and the 500 samples were allocated to the overall total of 129 parishes (which are within 21 sub-counties). Sampling was proportionally allocated to each parish, depending on the pig population of that parish [14], so that parishes with more pigs had a higher proportion of samples. Animal health workers provided a complete list of homesteads in each parish from which homes were selected randomly and pigs to sample were also randomly chosen during the home to home visits.

2.3. Collection of Serum Samples, Latrine Survey and Husbandry System

Pigs were bled from the cranial vena cava and blood collected into plain vacutainer tubes and then allowed to clot at ambient temperature and later centrifuged to separate the serum which was extracted and stored at −20°C until use. The age of the pigs sampled was recorded and a total of 528 homesteads were visited for this purpose in the two districts. The pig husbandry system was assessed by direct observation and discussions with the pig owners. In each village visited during the home to home pig survey, the availability of pit latrines and information on deworming of pigs by the veterinary staff in the area was captured at every fifth homestead.

2.4. Analysis of Serum Samples

The B158/B60 Ag-ELISA for the detection of circulating antigens of T. solium cysticerci was conducted as described by Brandt et al. [15], and modified by Dorny et al. [16]. The test was carried out at the School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka (a regional reference laboratory for cysticercosis). The assay involved coating polystyrene 96 well ELISA plates (Nunc® Maxisorp). Two monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) sourced from the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Antwerp, Belgium were used. The first was MoAb B158C11A10 diluted at 3 μg/mL in carbonate buffer (0.06 M, pH  9.6) and used for coating while the second biotinylated MoAb B60H8A4 diluted at 2.5 μg/mL in Phosphate Buffered Saline-Tween 20 (PBS-T20) + 1% New Born Calf Serum (NBCS) was used as detector antibody. The incubations were carried out at 37°C on a shaker during 30 minutes for the coating of the first MoAb and during 15 minutes for all sub-sequent steps. Blocking was done by adding 150 μL of PBS-T20 + 1% NBCS per well. Without washing the plate, 100 μL of pre-treated sera at a dilution of 1/4 was added to the wells. All steps [addition of second MoAb, streptavidine and Orthophenylene diamine (OPD)] were done after washing the plates five times with PBS-T20. This was followed by addition of 100 μL of biotinylated MoAb B60H8A4 diluted at 3.2 μg/mL in PBS-T20/1% NBCS. Hundred microlitres of streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (Jackson Immunoresearch Lab, Inc.) diluted at 1/10,000 in PBS-T20/1% NBCS was added to act as conjugate. Thereafter, 100 μL of the OPD solution and H2O2 was added and incubated without shaking in the dark at room temperature. To stop the reaction, 50 μL of 4N H2SO4 was added to each well. The plates were read using an ELISA reader at 492 nm. To determine the cut-off, the optical density (OD) of each serum sample was compared with a series of 8 reference negative serum samples (of Ugandan pigs) at a probability level of P = .001 [17].

3. Results

A total of 513 pigs were sampled in 129 parishes. All parishes in the sample frame were visited. 161 of the samples were collected in the new Kaliro District, with the remainder (352) in Kamuli. For the purposes of this analysis, results for the entire area are considered together. Overall, 74% of pig owners reported that their home had access to a pit latrine, and 18.2% had previously de-wormed their pigs, indicating a relatively low level of veterinary intervention involving the pig population.

Of the 513 samples, 480 were screened with the B158/B60 (inadequate volume of serum available in 33 samples). Forty-one pig samples were positive for cysticercosis antigen (see Table 1), or 8.5% (95% CI 6–11%), with no significant differences by age group (χ 2 = 1.355, d f = 2, P = .508). Positive parishes are shown in Figure 2; 36 of the 129 (28%) parishes in the study area showed at least 1 B158/B60 Ag-ELISA positive pig among the randomly selected individuals sampled from the total population.

Figure 2
Prevalence of cysticercosis in the study site (Kamuli and Kaliro Districts), by B158/B60 Ag-ELISA.
Table 1
Prevalence of cysticercosis by B158/B60 Ag-ELISA.

Free range management was found to be the most common method of pig husbandry, based on observations and farmer reports, with the tethering of pigs usually only taking place when neighbours protested against the free roaming of the animals.

4. Discussion

Although there are previous studies on porcine cysticercosis in Uganda [18, 19] this is the most recent, albeit preliminary, field survey for porcine cysticercosis in the country, and has investigated the prevalence of antigen-positive pigs across an entire rural district of south-east Uganda. The district under study has seen, in line with many other parts of Uganda, large increases in pig production over the past few years [20]; pigs are relatively cheap and easy to keep in rural areas, where their husbandry has been actively encouraged [3]. The study region is also thought to be a source for pig meat consumed in the capital city, Kampala—pork consumption has been estimated at 5,000 kg per year in pork-roasting centres of Kampala city alone (CW, pers. obs.).

In our field survey, 8.5% of 480 pigs screened were seropositive for the parasite by B158/B60 Ag-ELISA. Preliminary data from other studies conducted in 2008 (FAO TCP/UGA/3104 project; in prep.) indicate similar results by lingual examination, which may indicate a rising prevalence since lingual examination is less sensitive and if the samples from the TCP are subjected to the B158/B60 Ag-ELISA, a higher prevalence might be expected. The results generated in this study showed a lower prevalence than in other studies in ESA in recent years with 23% recorded using Ag-ELISA in Zambia [21]; 17% recorded using lingual examination in Tanzania [6] and 40–50% recorded using Ag-ELISA in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa [22]. These differences are, in themselves, intriguing; latrine provision was reportedly higher in this study than in Zambia, for example, [23], possibly limiting pig access to infectious material. Although in Zambia, latrine provision in itself was not found to be a risk factor for cysticercosis in pigs, the free range method of pig husbandry in the current study implies that those homes not using latrines may be a major risk facilitating access by pigs to infectious material. Cysticercosis infection patterns are known to vary spatially even in fairly restricted areas [11], and infection in pigs is a function of both human contamination of the environment and pig proximity to a human T. solium tapeworm carrier [24].

This preliminary study should thus serve as a stimulant for the generation of larger and more comprehensive datasets on this neglected zoonotic disease in Uganda; a particular focus of future work should be on the adult worm and antibody prevalence in humans, as well as risk factors for infection in both pigs and humans. In this regard, further surveys of pigs, seroprevalence surveys in humans and an understanding of cysticercosis-related epilepsy are required, together with risk-factor studies where human infection is found [25]. This will enable a better understanding of the scale of the cysticercosis problem and consequent evidence-based decisions on appropriate methods for its control.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through a Grant to CW from the Animal Health Programme of the UK Department for International Development (DFID-AHP). EMF was supported by a Wellcome Trust “Value in People” award and a DEFRA-VTRI 0101 Fellowship. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding bodies.

References

1. Waiswa C, Mubwoli J, Wampande E, Oweikanga JK. Prevalence of endoparasitic infections in pigs of south-eastern Uganda . African Journal of Animal and Biomedical Sciences. 2007;2:36–41.
2. Phiri IK, Ngowi H, Afonso S, et al. The emergence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in Eastern and Southern Africa as a serious agricultural problem and public health risk. Acta Tropica. 2003;87(1):13–23. [PubMed]
3. Government of Uganda. Policy statement for the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, VOTE 010/142, Kampala, Uganda, 2004.
4. White AC., Jr. Neurocysticercosis: updates on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Annual Review of Medicine. 2000;51:187–206. [PubMed]
5. Mafojane NA, Appleton CC, Krecek RC, Michael LM, Willingham AL., III The current status of neurocysticercosis in Eastern and Southern Africa. Acta Tropica. 2003;87(1):25–33. [PubMed]
6. Ngowi HA, Kassuku AA, Maeda GEM, Boa ME, Carabin H, Willingham AL., III Risk factors for the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis in Mbulu District, Tanzania. Veterinary Parasitology. 2004;120(4):275–283. [PubMed]
7. Katabarwa M, Lakwo T, Habumogisha P, Richards F, Eberhard M. Short report: could neurocysticercosis be the cause of “onchocerciasis-associated” epileptic seizures? American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;78(3):400–401. [PubMed]
8. Nzisabira L, Nsengiyumva G, Bouteille B, et al. La cysticercose dans la province de Kayanza (Burundi) Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique. 1992;85(5):374–377. [PubMed]
9. Nsengiyumva G, Druet-Cabanac M, Ramanankandrasana B, Bouteille B, Nsizabira L, Preux P-M. Cysticercosis as a major risk factor for epilepsy in Burundi, East Africa. Epilepsia. 2003;44(7):950–955. [PubMed]
10. Vanderick FX, Mbonyingabo P. La cysticercose humaine au Rwanda. Annales de la Société Belge de Médecine Tropicale. 1972;52(2):153–155. [PubMed]
11. Sarti E, Rajshekhar V. Measures for the prevention and control of Taenia solium taeniosis and cysticercosis. Acta Tropica. 2003;87(1):137–143. [PubMed]
12. Pawlowski Z, Allan J, Sarti E. Control of Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis: from research towards implementation. International Journal for Parasitology. 2005;35(11-12):1221–1232. [PubMed]
13. Garcia HH, Gilman RH, Gonzalez AE, et al. Human and porcine Taenia solium infection in a village in the highlands of Cusco, Peru. Acta Tropica. 1999;73(1):31–36. [PubMed]
14. Dohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Charlottetown, Canada: AVC Inc.; 2003.
15. Brandt JRA, Geerts S, De Deken R, et al. A monoclonal antibody-based ELISA for the detection of circulating excretory-secretory antigens in Taenia saginata cysticercosis. International Journal for Parasitology. 1992;22(4):471–477. [PubMed]
16. Dorny P, Phiri IK, Vercruysse J, et al. A Bayesian approach for estimating values for prevalence and diagnostic test characteristics of porcine cysticercosis. International Journal for Parasitology. 2004;34(5):569–576. [PubMed]
17. Dorny P, Vercammen F, Brandt J, Vansteenkiste W, Berkvens D, Geerts S. Sero-epidemiological study of Taenia saginata cysticercosis in Belgian cattle. Veterinary Parasitology. 2000;88(1-2):43–49. [PubMed]
18. Anyanzo T. Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine Special Project Report. Kampala, Uganda: Faculty of Medicine, Makerere University; 1999. Prevalence of cysticercosis cellulosae in three sub-counties of Moyo County, Moyo District, Uganda.
19. Kisakye JJM, Masaba SC. Cysticercus cellulosae in pigs slaughtered in and around Kampala City. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2002;7:23–24.
20. FAO. FAOSTAT: the statistical database of FAO. 2002, http://www.fao.org/corp/statistics/en.
21. Sikasunge CS, Phiri IK, Phiri AM, Siziya S, Dorny P, Willingham AL., III Prevalence of Taenia solium porcine cysticercosis in the Eastern, Southern and Western provinces of Zambia. Veterinary Journal. 2008;176(2):240–244. [PubMed]
22. Krecek RC, Michael LM, Schantz PM, et al. Prevalence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine from a community-based study in 21 villages of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Veterinary Parasitology. 2008;154(1-2):38–47. [PubMed]
23. Sikasunge CS, Phiri IK, Phiri AM, Dorny P, Siziya S, Willingham AL., III Risk factors associated with porcine cysticercosis in selected districts of Eastern and Southern provinces of Zambia. Veterinary Parasitology. 2007;143(1):59–66. [PubMed]
24. Lescano AG, Garcia HH, Gilman RH, et al. Taenia solium cysticercosis hotspots surrounding tapeworm carriers: clustering on human seroprevalence but not on seizures. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2009;3(1, article e371) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Willingham AL, III, Harrison LJ, Fèvre EM, Parkhouse ME. Inaugural meeting of the Cysticercosis Working Group in Europe. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2008;14(12, article e2) [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Parasitology Research are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Limited