Self-Control Protects Against Overweight Status in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence

doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.97

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 July 1.

Published in final edited form as:

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 July; 164(7): 631–635.

doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.97

PMCID: PMC2914627

NIHMSID: NIHMS215387

Self-Control Protects Against Overweight Status in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence

Eli Tsukayama, M.A.,^* Sara L. Toomey, M.D., M.P.H., M.Phil., M.Sc.,^** Myles Faith, Ph.D.,^* and Angela Lee Duckworth, Ph.D.^*

^* University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

^** Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania (Mr. Tsukayama and Dr. Duckworth); Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School (Dr. Toomey); and the Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiartry, University of Pennsylvania (Dr. Faith).

Author Contributions: Mr. Tsukayama had full access to all of the data in this study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Tsukayama, Duckworth.

Acquisition of the data: Tsukayama, Duckworth.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: Tsukayama, Toomey, Faith, Duckworth.

Drafting of the manuscript: Tsukayama, Toomey, Faith, Duckworth.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Tsukayama, Toomey, Faith, Duckworth.

Statistical analysis: Tsukayama, Duckworth.

Obtained funding: N/A.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Tsukayama, Toomey, Faith, Duckworth.

Study supervision: Tsukayama, Duckworth.

Corresponding Author: Eli Tsukayama, M.A., Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, 3701 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Email: elit/at/psych.upenn.edu).

The publisher's final edited version of this article is available at Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

See other articles in PMC that cite the published article.

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether more self-controlled children are protected from weight gain as they enter adolescence.

Design

Prospective, longitudinal study.

Setting

Ten sites across the United States from 1991-2007.

Participants

The 844 children in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development birth cohort who had height and weight information at age 15 (in 2006).

Main Exposure

A composite measure of self-control was created from mother, father, and teacher-report ratings using items from the Social Skills Rating System.

Main Outcome Measure

Overweight status at age 15 years.

Results

Approximately one-third of the sample (n = 262) was overweight at age 15. Compared to their non-overweight peers, overweight adolescents at age 15 were about a half-standard deviation lower in self-control at age 9 (unstandardized difference = 0.15, pooled SD = 0.29, P < .001). Children rated higher by their parents and teachers in self-control at age 9 were less likely to be overweight at age 15 (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98), controlling for overweight status at age 10, pubertal development, age, IQ, gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and maternal overweight status.

Conclusion

More self-controlled boys and girls are less likely to become overweight as they enter adolescence. The ability to control impulses and delay gratification enables children to maintain a healthy weight even in today's obesogenic environment.

Self-Control Protects Against Overweight Status in the Transition from Childhood to Adolescence

Body fat increases during the transition from childhood to adolescence. However, rapid increases in BMI relative to one's gender and age cohort during this period predict a range of negative health outcomes in adulthood, including coronary events, diabetes mellitus, and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue.¹^-⁴ Moreover, excessive weight gain in adolescence is particularly prognostic of adulthood weight problems, suggesting adolescence as a critical period for the development of obesity.⁵^,⁶ Previously identified risk/protective factors for excessive weight in adolescence include pubertal development, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.⁷^-⁹ Less is known about relevant psychological variables, including self-control.

Self-control is the ability to override impulses in order to achieve goals and maintain standards. The capacity to resist immediate temptations in order to act in one's best long-term interests is among the most important developmental milestones in the social development of children.¹⁰^,¹¹ Relative to their more impulsive peers, self-controlled children are less likely to engage in delinquent behavior and earn higher report card grades and achievement test scores.¹²^,¹³ Prospective longitudinal studies suggest that self-control in childhood predicts a range of consequential adult outcomes, including life expectancy, career success, and years of education.¹⁴^-¹⁷

Two analyses of the 1991-2007 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development birth cohort suggest that more self-controlled preschoolers stay leaner than their more impulsive peers as they enter middle childhood.¹⁸^,¹⁹ One analysis did not control for the possible confound of maternal BMI.¹⁸ In a second analysis, when maternal BMI was controlled, the association between self-control and BMI was no longer significant.¹⁹ Thus, while suggestive, prior research has not unequivocally established a causal role for self-control in determining weight gain during development.

One might expect the influence of self-control on weight to increase as children mature and are granted more autonomy from their parents.²⁰^,²¹ Indeed, before age 7 years, children are generally quite adept at self-regulating their energy intake,²²^,²³ although this ability appears to worsen in later childhood and adolescence.²⁴^,²⁵ Moreover, the entry into adolescence typically is accompanied by unprecedented independence from parents in lifestyle choices -- including what and how much to eat. In the current obesogenic environment, more self-controlled children would be expected to make decisions that maximize long-term well-being, even at the expense of short-term gratification.

The primary aim of our study was to examine self-control at age 9 as a protective factor against overweight status at age 15. We hypothesize that self-control inversely predicts overweight status in adolescence, controlling for potential confounders shown to be associated with adolescent BMI, including pubertal development, maternal overweight status, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and intelligence.⁷^-⁹^,²⁶^,²⁷

Methods

Study Population

The participants were 844 children from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD-SECCYD). The NICHD-SECCYD is a longitudinal multisite study originally designed to examine the effects of child care on development. Details of study recruitment and data collection protocols are described on the study's website (https://secc.rti.org/). Data collection was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards for each study site in the NICHD-SECCYD and written informed consent was received from each family. We used data collected between the ages of 9 and 15. Out of the 1,364 total participants in the NICHD-SECCYD, we included the 844 children who had height and weight measured at age 15.

Measures

Self-control

When the children were nine years of age, mothers (or the primary caregiver; n = 820), fathers (or another adult if the father was not available; e.g., grandparent; n = 565), and classroom teachers (n = 730) completed the parent and teacher versions of the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS) questionnaire.²⁸ The SSRS is a widely used inventory of positive child behaviors which caregivers rate on a 3-point frequency scale ranging from 0 = Never to 2 = Very often. We followed best practices in personality psychology by using ratings from all three sources to maximize reliability and accuracy.²⁹ Specifically, we considered content validity and correspondence with previously validated measures of self-control³⁰^,³¹ when selecting SSRS items related to self-control (Table 1). Next, we confirmed that observed internal reliability coefficients for mother, father, and teacher scales were acceptable (ranging from α = .73 to .86, with an average of .78) and that scores were significantly correlated (ranging from r = .32 to .52, with an average of .40, all P-values < .001). We averaged the items for each rater and then created a composite measure of self-control by averaging the mother, father, and teacher ratings. The correlations of each rating with the composite measure were about .80, and the internal reliability of this composite was r = .87, according to a formula specific to linear combinations of scores.³² Approximately 59% of participants had mother, father, and teacher ratings, 34% were missing one of these scores, and 7% were missing two of the scores. We averaged the two non-missing scores for participants who were missing one score, and we used the single non-missing score for participants who were missing two scores.

Table 1

Social Skill Rating System (SSRS) items^a used to assess self-control at age 9 years

Overweight status

Nurse practitioners or pediatric endocrinologists measured children's height and weight during health and physical development assessments using standardized protocols at ages 10 and 15. Height was recorded to the nearest 1/8 inch and weight was recorded in pounds and ounces. Both height and weight were measured twice. If the height measurements differed by more than ½ inch or if the weight measurements differed by more than 4 ounces, then two new measurements were obtained to verify the respective measures. Height and weight measures were converted to metric units, and BMI scores were calculated. Raw BMI scores were then converted to age- and gender-specific BMI z-scores using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2000 growth reference charts.³³ We classified children with BMI z-scores greater than 1.036 (85^th percentile) as overweight.

Pubertal status

During the health and physical development assessments, nurse practitioners or pediatric endocrinologists assessed children's pubertal development using Tanner Stage criterion. Girls were assessed in terms of breast development on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = No breast development to 5 = Mature adult stage, and boys were assessed in terms of genital development on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = Same size and shape as in childhood to 5 = Mature adult stage. Pubertal status was defined as the Tanner Stage rating at age 15, or “5” if no Tanner Stage rating was available at age 15 but a previous rating was “5” (i.e., mature adult stage). Because this variable was highly skewed (500 for Stage 5 vs. 105 for Stage 4, 14 for Stage 3, and 1 for Stage 2), we created a binary variable indicating attainment of Stage 5.

Intelligence

We used the Full Scale IQ score from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) administered when the children were nine years old.³⁴ The four subtests—Vocabulary, Block Design, Similarities, and Matrix Reasoning—measure verbal knowledge, verbal and non-verbal reasoning, and visual information processing. The WASI is highly correlated with the longer Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Third Edition, r = .87.³⁴

Maternal overweight status

Mothers’ self-reported their height and weight when their children were 15 years of age. We computed BMI scores and classified mothers with BMI scores greater than 25 as overweight.

Demographic variables

Data on gender, ethnicity, and birthdate were recorded. Ethnicity—White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, or other—was defined by the mother and was originally collected in the SECCYD because ethnicity is associated with use of child care. Because “Hispanic” was not an exclusive category, we coded Hispanic as its own group with the other groups not including Hispanics (e.g., “White” equals “Non-Hispanic White”) for our analyses. As a proxy for socioeconomic status, we used the income-to-needs ratio (assessed in terms of income compared to the US Census Bureau-defined poverty line) at age 9, which we log-transformed to normalize the distribution.

Statistical analysis

We computed summary statistics and examined differences in measures by overweight status at age 15. Self-control, age, log-transformed income-to-needs ratio, and IQ were treated as continuous variables; overweight status at age 10, gender, ethnicity, pubertal development, and maternal overweight status were treated as categorical variables. To test statistical significance of differences, we used t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for dichotomous variables. For our multivariable analyses, we conducted poisson regressions with robust standard errors³⁵ using overweight status at age 15 as the outcome and self-control, overweight status at age 10, gender, ethnicity, age, pubertal development, log-transformed income-to-needs ratio, IQ, and maternal overweight status as predictors. Given that our covariates have been shown to be potential confounds in prior research, we simultaneously forced all predictors into the model. We also examined all variables as potential moderators of the effect of self-control on overweight status at age 15 in separate models using a Bonferroni correction to adjust for multiple comparisons.

Approximately 3.5% of the data were missing; about half of missing values were pubertal development at age 15. To avoid biased estimates, we used multiple imputation to handle missing data.³⁶^,³⁷ We conducted all analyses in Stata, Version SE 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX), used two-tailed tests, and set significance at P < .05.

Results

About 77% of participants were White, 12% were Black, 6% were Hispanic, 1% were Asian, and 4% were of other ethnic backgrounds; 50% were female. The median household income, assessed in terms of income-to-needs, was 3.4 times the US Census Bureau-defined poverty line. The mean age of participants in December, 2006 was 15.6 years (SD = 0.2).

Table 2 describes the characteristics of participants by overweight status at age 15. Approximately one-third of the sample (n = 262) were overweight at age 15. The average BMI z-score in this sample was 0.53 at age 10 and 0.57 at age 15. Compared to their non-overweight peers, overweight adolescents at age 15 were about a half-standard deviation lower in self-control at age 9 (unstandardized difference = 0.15, pooled SD = 0.29, P<.001). Overweight adolescents were also more likely to be Black (17% vs. 10%; P<.01) or of an “Other ethnicity” (6% vs. 3%; P<.05), to be male (58% vs. 46 %; P<.001), to have a lower IQ (104 vs. 108; P<.001), have an overweight mother (74% vs. 47%; P<.001), and to be from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (log values of income-to-needs .87 vs. 1.30; P<.001).

Table 2

Characteristics of Participants by Overweight Status at Age 15^a and Adjusted Relative Risks from Poisson Regression with Robust Standard Errors Predicting Overweight Status at Age 15

Table 2 presents the results of the poisson regression analysis. Children who were rated as being more self-controlled at age 9 were less likely to be overweight at age 15 (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98), even when controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, pubertal development, IQ, log income-to-needs ratio, maternal overweight status, and overweight status at age 10. Children who were rated 1-point higher on a 3-point self-control scale were 26% less likely to be overweight as adolescents. Being female (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.98), belonging to a lower socioeconomic background (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96), having a mother who is overweight (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.62), and being overweight at age 10 (RR, 6.81; 95% CI, 5.11-9.08) were also significant predictors of overweight status at age 15, after adjusting for the other covariates. None of the observed variables moderated the effect of self-control on overweight status at age 15.

A comparable analysis with obese status (i.e., BMI z-score > 1.64) as the outcome showed an effect of similar magnitude for self-control (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.03) but was not significant (P = .07), likely due to the smaller number of obese (n = 132) compared to overweight individuals in the dataset.

Comment

In a prospective, longitudinal study of 844 participants, we found that children rated higher in self-control by their parents and teachers at age 9 were less likely to become overweight by age 15. This relationship was significant even when controlling for a wide range of potential confounders.

Rapid weight gain during the transition to adolescence is prognostic of poor health outcomes in adulthood,¹^,²^,⁴^,³⁸ suggesting the importance of identifying risk/protective factors prior to this stage of development. Extant research on weight gain has pointed to several relevant factors, including “obesogenic” environments (i.e., cheap and convenient high-calorie foods offered in large portions),³⁹ low socioeconomic status,⁸ and ethnicity.⁷ None of these well-studied risk/protective factors are easily changed. Because excess weight is a behaviorally mediated condition (i.e., excess weight is caused by ingesting more calories than are expended), psychological variables that influence lifestyle choices deserve more attention. The purpose of our study was to explore the protective role of self-control during the transition to adolescence, a period during which children are given increasing latitude to decide what to eat. We expected more self-controlled children to make healthier choices than their more impulsive peers. Our findings are consistent with this prediction.

This study has several limitations. First, while our sample was somewhat diverse in terms of ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status, it was not nationally representative. Therefore, our findings may not generalize to all segments of the US population. Second, children's knowledge of healthy eating choices was not measured. We would expect such knowledge to moderate the observed relationship between self-control and weight change: self-control likely does not protect children from weight gain if they fail to recognize that some foods are more fattening and less healthy than others. Finally, we cannot rule out the possibility that an unmeasured third-variable confounder associated with self-control at age 9 and weight change from age 10 to 15 accounted for the observed findings. To do so would require a randomized controlled trial in which self-control was durably increased in children and subsequent effects on weight assessed. Preschool curricula with demonstrated effects on self-control suggest that such an investigation is now possible.⁴⁰

The wide availability of fatty, sugary, salty foods is unprecedented in human history, explaining much of the recent pandemic increase in obesity.⁴¹ The impulse to consume these fattening foods to excess has strong evolutionary origins, but, so too does the capacity to override such impulses.³⁹^,⁴¹ Indeed, the capacity to regulate impulses to indulge in temptations that feel good momentarily but are detrimental in the long-term is a uniquely human competence. Individual differences in self-control, like every other personality trait, are partly genetic in origin.⁴² Nevertheless, the influence of genes does not preclude the importance of self-control strategies children can be directly taught in the context of parent-child and physician-patient interactions. For instance, children can be encouraged to use their attention strategically, putting temptations literally “out of sight and out of mind.”⁴⁰^,⁴³ Planning in advance what to do when temptation strikes has also been shown to be an effective and teachable self-regulation strategy. Finally, children – and their parents - can be taught to “precommit” to healthy choices (e.g., not keeping junk food in the house or not bringing extra money to school to purchase treats). As Kessler concludes in the End of Overeating, fattening temptations in the modern world abound, but “the power to resist ultimately rests with us.”³⁹

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Faith has received grants from the NIH to study interventions for early childhood obesity. There are no other potential conflicts of interest that we are aware of related to the material in this manuscript.

References

1. Barker DJP, Osmond C, Forsen TJ, Kajantie E, Eriksson JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1802–1809. [PubMed]

2. Baker JL, Olsen LW, Sorensen TIA. Childhood body-mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2329–2337. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

3. Kindblom JM, Lorentzon M, Hellqvist A, et al. BMI changes during childhood and adolescence as predictors of amount of adult subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in men. Diabetes. 2009;58:867–874. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

4. Bhargava SK, Sachdev HS, Fall CHD, et al. Relation of serial changes in childhood body-mass index to impaired glucose tolerance in young adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:865–875. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

5. Dietz WH. Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:955–959. [PubMed]

6. Dietz WH. Overweight in childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:855–857. [PubMed]

7. Freedman DS, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Racial differences in the tracking of childhood BMI to adulthood. Obes Res. 2005;13:928–935. [PubMed]

8. Hardy R, Wadsworth M, Kuh D. The influence of childhood weight and socioeconomic status on change in adult body mass index in a British national birth cohort. Int J Obes. 2000;24:725–734. [PubMed]

9. Bini V, Celi F, Berioli MG, et al. Body mass index in children and adolescents according to age and pubertal stage. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54:214–218. [PubMed]

10. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Fabes RA, et al. The relations of effortful control and impulsivity to children's resiliency and adjustment. Child Development. 2004 Jan;75:25–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

11. Kochanska G, Murray KT, Harlan ET. Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology. 2000 Mar;36:220–232. [PubMed]

12. Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci. 2005 Dec;16:939–944. [PubMed]

13. White JL, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Bartusch DJ, Needles DJ, Stouthamer-Loeber M. Measuring impulsivity and examining its relationship to delinquency. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103:192–205. [PubMed]

14. Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Tomlinson-Keasey C, Schwartz JE, et al. Does childhood personality predict longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993 Jul;65:176–185. [PubMed]

15. Friedman HS, Tucker JS, Schwartz JE, et al. Childhood conscientiousness and longevity: Health behaviors and cause of death. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995 Apr;68:696–703. [PubMed]

16. Shiner RL, Masten AS, Roberts JM. Childhood personality foreshadows adult personality and life outcomes two decades later. Journal of Personality. 2003 Dec;71:1145–1170. [PubMed]

17. Kern M, Friedman H, Martin L, Reynolds C, Luong G. Conscientiousness, career success, and longevity: A lifespan analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;37:154–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

18. Francis LA, Susman EJ. Self-regulation and Rapid Weight Gain in Children From Age 3 to 12 Years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:297–302. [PubMed]

19. Seeyave DM, Coleman S, Appugliese D, et al. Ability to delay gratification at age 4 years and risk of overweight at age 11 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:303–308. [PubMed]

20. Dornbusch SM, Carlsmith JM, Bushwall SJ, et al. Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents. Child Dev. 1985;56:326–341. [PubMed]

21. Steinberg L, Silverberg SB. The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Dev. 1986:841–851. [PubMed]

22. Johnson SL, Birch LL. Parents’ and children's adiposity and eating style. Pediatrics. 1994;94:653–661. [PubMed]

23. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 1998;101:539–549. [PubMed]

24. Anderson GH, Saravis S, Schacher R, Zlotkin S, Leiter LA. Aspartame: effect on lunch-time food intake, appetite and hedonic response in children. Appetite. 1989;13:93–103. [PubMed]

25. Johnson SL, Taylor-Holloway LA. Non-Hispanic white and Hispanic elementary school children's self-regulation of energy intake. 2006;83:1276–1282. [PubMed]

26. Chandola T, Deary IJ, Blane D, Batty GD. Childhood IQ in relation to obesity and weight gain in adult life: the National Child Development (1958) Study. Int J Obes. 2006;30:1422–1432. [PubMed]

27. Laitinen J, Power C, Jarvelin MR. Family social class, maternal body mass index, childhood body mass index, and age at menarche as predictors of adult obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:287–294. [PubMed]

28. Gresham FM, Elliot SN. Social Skills Rating Scale Manual. American Guidance Service; Circle Pines, MN: 1990.

29. Eid M, Diener E, editors. Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC: 2006.

30. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality. 2004 Apr;72:271–322. [PubMed]

31. Eysenck SB, Easting G, Pearson PR. Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in children. Personality and Individual Differences. 1984;5:315–321.

32. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed McGraw-Hill.; New York: 1978.

33. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC: 2002.

34. Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. The Psychological Corporation.; San Antonio, TX: 1999.

35. Cummings P. The relative merits of risk ratios and odds ratios. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:438–445. [PubMed]

36. Allison PD. Missing Data. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2002.

37. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ice. The Stata Journal. 2005;4:527–536.

38. Kindblom JM, Lorentzon M, Hellqvist Ãs, et al. BMI changes during childhood and adolescence as predictors of amount of adult subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in men. Diabetes. 2009;58:867–874. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

39. Kessler DA. The end of overeating: Controlling the insatiable American appetite. Rodale Inc.; New York, NY, United States: 2009.

40. Diamond A, Barnett S, Thomas J, Munro S. Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science. 2007;318:1387–1388. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

41. Rachlin H. The science of self-control. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA: 2000.

42. Tellegen A, Lykken DT, Bouchard TJ, Wilcox KJ, Rich S. Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54:1031–1039. [PubMed]

43. Bandura A, Mischel W. Modifications of self-imposed delay of reward through exposure to live and symbolic models. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1965 Nov;2:698–705. [PubMed]