PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Clin Cancer Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC Jul 15, 2011.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2914465
NIHMSID: NIHMS209217
Mature miRNA sequence polymorphism in MIR196A2 is associated with risk and prognosis of head and neck cancer
Brock C. Christensen,1,2 Michele Avissar-Whiting,1 Lauren G. Ouellet,1 Rondi A. Butler,1 Heather H. Nelson,3 Michael D. McClean,4 Carmen J. Marsit,1 and Karl T. Kelsey*1,2
1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
2 Department of Community Health, Center for Environmental Health and Technology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
3 Masonic Cancer Center, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
4 Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118
* To whom correspondence should be addressed, P: (401)863-6420, F: (401)863-9008, Karl_Kelsey/at/Brown.edu, Brown University, Box GE-5, 70 Ship Street, Providence, RI, 02903
Purpose
The central role of microRNAs (miRNA) as regulators of translation has been well established, while the relationships between genetic variation in miRNAs and disease risk is only beginning to be explored. A polymorphism in the MIR196A2 locus has demonstrated associations with lung, breast, esophageal, and gastric tumors, but has not been examined in head and neck cancers, which share similar pathology and etiology to these diseases.
Experimental Design
We studied a polymorphism in the mature sequence of MIR196A2 (rs11614913, C/T) in a population-based case-control study (total n=1039) of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to determine if MIR196A2 genotype was associated with disease occurrence and patient survival.
Results
Presence of any variant allele was associated with a significantly reduced risk of HNSCC (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.56 – 0.99). Homozygous variant allele carriers with pharyngeal tumors had significantly reduced survival compared to wild-type and heterozygous cases (HR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9 – 28.2). Expression analysis in a subset of tumors (n=83) revealed no significant difference in relative expression of either miR-196a or miR-196a* by MIR196A2 genotype.
Conclusion
These data demonstrate a role for MIR196A2 genotype in susceptibility and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Keywords: MIR196A2, polymorphism, head and neck, susceptibility, prognosis
With approximately 45,000 new cases diagnosed and over 11,000 deaths each year, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a relatively common cancer in the United States (1). Three major etiologic factors contribute to risk and prognosis of HNSCC: tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (2, 3). Recently, examinations of miRNA expression profiles in HNSCC have highlighted the importance of miRNA expression alterations in HNSCC tumorigenesis, disease etiology, and survival (4-10).
Micro-RNAs (miRNAs), short non-coding RNAs which prevent translation of their target mRNAs are critical regulators of the transcriptome (11). MiRNAs are known to play a crucial role in gene regulation, and altered expression of miRNAs in human cancers has been well documented (12). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occurring in microRNAs (miRNAs) or in their binding sites are novel sources of genetic variation that may contribute to cancer susceptibility and prognosis (13, 14).
A genetic variant in the mature miRNA sequence of MIR196A2 (rs11614913) has been associated with reduced risk of breast cancer (15, 16), gastric cancer (17), and non-small cell lung cancer (18). In addition, this polymorphism has been associated with prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (19). The MIR196A2 gene encodes two mature miRNAs; miR-196a, which is regarded as the main mature product of the hairpin, and miR-196a*, which contains the SNP rs11614913. Prior investigations have suggested that this SNP effects the processing of the pre-microRNA into its mature, regulatory form (15).
We hypothesize that MIR196A2 genotype is associated with susceptibility to, and or prognosis of HNSCC and examined this hypothesis in a population-based case-control study.
Study population
The study population has been previously described (20, 21). Briefly, incident cases of HNSCC were identified from nine medical facilities in the Boston metropolitan area, with histologic classification of malignancy reported by pathology of the participating hospitals and confirmed by an independent study pathologist. Population-based controls were drawn from the same greater Boston population and matched to cases by gender, age (+/- 3 years), and town of residence using the Massachusetts town lists. All cases and controls enrolled in the study provided written informed consent as approved by the institutional review boards of the participating institutions. Survival time was determined for cases using publicly available databases.
DNA isolation and genotyping
DNA was extracted from whole blood or buccal cells with the QIAamp DNA mini kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Genotyping of the MIR196A2 mirSNP (rs11614913, C/T) was done using Taqman® allelic discrimination (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with a commercially available primer probe set (assay ID C_31185852_10). Genotyping was performed in a blinded fashion, appropriate controls were included in each run, and approximately 10% of samples were duplicated in a coded fashion as quality assurance with >95% concordance observed between replicates.
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from tumors obtained at initial resection or normal human tissues from head and neck sites obtained from the National Disease Research Interchange (NDRI, Philadelphia, PA) that were snap-frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. The mirVANA RNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was quantified using the Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE), aliquoted and stored at −80°C briefly until used for laboratory analysis.
Quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction
TaqMan miRNA Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were used to quantify mature miRNAs miR-196a (Custom assay) and miR-196a* (Assay ID 002336). To test whether the assay for miR-196a differentially amplified target sequence based on genotype we measured synthetic oligonucleotide sequences for the mature miRNAs and report absolute Ct values as the synthetic miRNA sequences were the only substrate in this experiment. Complementary DNA was synthesized by priming with gene-specific looped primers including the primers of the miRNAs of interest and RNU44, a universally expressed endogenous control (Applied Biosystems). A 5 μl volume of total RNA diluted to a final concentration of 10 ng/μl was used for each reverse transcription reaction along with other reverse transcription components, per manufacturer's specifications. Fifteen microliter reactions were incubated in an Applied Biosystems GeneAmp PCR system 9700 for 30 min at 16°C, 30 min at 42°C, 5 min at 85°C and held at 4°C. All reactions, excluding no-template controls and non-reverse transcribed controls, were run in triplicate on an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR Detection System, according to manufacturer's protocol. All real-time polymerase chain reaction data were normalized to the RNU44 transcript, a non-coding RNA used as a normalization control in the study of miRNA expression (6).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using the SAS software, and all P values represent two-sided statistical tests. Tests for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were conducted. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted ORs and 95% CIs for the association of MIR196A2 genotype and HNSCC risk adjusting for age, sex, HPV16 status, alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking packyears. Although subjects without HPV16 serology data could have been coded as missing and included, as a more conservative approach these subjects were not included in the model. For analyses by tumor location, cases were grouped according to ICD-9 code, with oral cancer encompassing ICD9 141-145, pharyngeal cancers 146-149, and laryngeal cancers 161. As homozygous variant and heterozygous genotypes had similar ORs and in order to improve power for examination of the rare variant allele, these groups were combined, with homozygous wildtype as the referent (dominant model). Patient survival was examined in a recessive model using Cox proportional hazards modeling to control for variables related to patient survival. These survival probability models included variables representing the combined homozygous variant and controlled for patient age (in decades), tumor stage (1 and 2 vs. 3 and 4), and all other covariates in the table. MicroRNA expression data were subjected to a two-sided, unpaired, student's t-test assuming equal means and unequal variance.
Among 1242 eligible subjects with genotyping data, 203 did not have HPV16 serology data and were excluded. There were no differences in the demographic or exposure characteristics of these individuals compared to the full study population. Characteristics of the remaining 484 cases (269 oral, 123, pharyngeal, and 92 laryngeal cancers) and 555 controls are described in Table 1 (total n=1039). Distributions of study participant age, gender, and race between cases and controls were similar. Relationships between disease risk, etiologic factors, and tumor site in this study population have been described previously (3, 20-22).
Table 1
Table 1
Participant characteristics of HNSCC cases and controls genotyped for rs11614913 in MIR196A2.
We examined the association of genotype in the mature sequence of MIR196A2 with case status. Genotypes were within Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and the prevalence of control subject genotypes (C/C, 35.3%; C/T, 49.2; T/T, 15.5) was nearly equivalent to control subject genotypes reported in another study of subjects predominantly of European decent (C/C, 35.6; C/T, 49.1; T/T, 15.3) (15).
In models controlling for potential confounders, presence of any variant allele was associated with a significantly reduced risk of HNSCC (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6 – 0.99, Table 2). The association between the variant allele and decreased risk of HNSCC was evident for individual tumor sites, though only reached statistical significance among cases with pharyngeal disease (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4 – 0.96). Both in overall and tumor-site-specific analyses there was no effect modification of the association between genotype and disease by packyears smoked, average drinks per week or HPV16 seropositive status (data not shown).
Table 2
Table 2
MIR196A2 variant genotype is associated with significantly reduced risk of HNSCC.
We then examined the association of the MIR196A2 variant genotype with disease survival. Carriers of any variant allele did not have significantly different survival compared to wild-type cases (data not shown). Additionally, homozygous variant cases did not have significantly different survival probability compared to wild-type and heterozygous cases (Log-rank P = 0.33, n=418; Figure 1A). Stratifying by tumor site, there was no significant survival association for cases with oral cavity tumors (P = 0.98, n=243; Figure 1B), or laryngeal cancer (P = 0.55, n=74; Figure 1C). However, cases with pharyngeal cancer and homozygous variant genotype had significantly reduced survival compared to wild-type and heterozygous cases (P < 0.02, n=101; Figure 1D). Cases with survival data and tumor staging (n=323) were entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to control for potential confounders, and no significant association between genotype and survival was found (Table 3). When stratifying the analysis by tumor site, pharyngeal cancer cases with homozygous variant genotype had significantly reduced survival (HR, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.9 – 28.2; Table 3).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier survival probability plots stratified by MIR196A2 genotype for head and neck tumors with available staging data. Survival time is defined as time from diagnosis to death or last known follow-up, where circles represent censored values. The (more ...)
Table 3
Table 3
Cox proportional hazards models of overall survival by MIR196A2 genotype controlled for confounders.
We measured expression levels of mature miRNAs miR-196a and miR-196a* in normal head and neck tissues (n=14) and fresh frozen tumor tissues (n=83) to determine if MIR196A2 variant genotype impacts expression. First, in order to validate that presence of the variant allele did not interfere with the detection of mature miRNAs, equivalent quantities of synthetic oligonucleotides corresponding to wild-type and variant miR-196a* sequences (and a 1:1 mix for heterozygous) were measured in triplicate with a stem-loop RT-PCR assay for miR-196a*. This assay did not to differentially amplify targets based on genotype (Ct values: wt=15.90, var=16.28, het=16.18). In normal head and neck tissues (n=14) we found no significant difference in the relative expression of either miR-196a or miR-196a* by MIR196A2 genotype (data not shown). Similarly, in tumor tissues (n=83) we found no significant difference in relative expression of either miR-196a or miR-196a* by MIR196A2 genotype, both overall (n=83), and when stratified by tumor location (Table 4).
Table 4
Table 4
MIRN196A genotype is not associated with mature miR-196a or miR-196a* expression in HNSCC.
Polymorphisms in miRNA genes and their target sites are a novel class of variation in the human genome that are rapidly being identified and investigated in human cancers including HNSCC (13, 14, 23-25). Motivated by several recent publications linking the MIR196A2 mature miRNA SNP to cancer susceptibility and prognosis (15-19, 26), we tested the hypothesis that this SNP (rs11614913) is associated with susceptibility to, and prognosis of HNSCC; finding a significantly decreased risk of HNSCC, and significantly reduced survival in cases with pharyngeal disease. Notably, the prevalence of control genotypes was completely consistent with another ethnically similar (Caucasian) population-based study (15). However, unlike some other reports (15, 19) when we assessed relative expression of mature miRNAs 196a and 196a* we did not detect significantly different expression by MIR196A2 genotype in either normal head and neck tissues or tumors.
Comparing expression levels of the mature miR-196a among MIR196A2 genotypes Hu et al. observed significantly lower expression of miR-196a in non-small cell lung tumor samples with C/C genotype (n=6) compared to C/T and T/T individuals (n=17) (19). These authors also measured endogenous levels of pri- and pre-miRNA sequences, but did not observe differential expression of these precursor molecules based on genotype (19). In a separate report, Hoffman et al. showed increased expression of mature miR-196a in breast cancer cells transfected with pre-miR-196a-C compared to cells transfected with miR-196a-T relative to empty vector control (15), but did not observe differential expression of the precursor miRNA in their transfection experiment, suggesting that MIR196A2 genotype may result in altered processing of the pre-miR (15). Relative to previous work, our expression results were from a large number of samples (n=83) affording sufficient statistical power to detect even subtle differences, and although the miR-196a expression results appear to be conflicting, cell-type-specific differential expression of miRNAs could explain these results. A recent examination of differential miRNA expression in several cancer types and adjacent normal tissues (including breast and lung, though not head and neck) showed a wide range of miR-196a expression across different normal tissues, tumor types, and between tumor and normal tissues from common sites (GSE14985) (27).
If miRNA SNPs directly affect the expression of mature miRNA species, then the functional relationship between these polymorphisms and disease susceptibility or prognosis may seem clear: altered miRNA expression leads to altered regulation of target mRNAs important in tumorigenesis. Nonetheless, even in the absence of altered mature miRNA expression levels, variation in the mature miR-196a* sequence itself could result in differential regulation of target mRNAs. Mature miR-196a* in variant allele form could have either an increased or decreased affinity for targets of wild-type miR-196a*. A determinant of the impact of miRNA sequence variation is cell-type-specific expression levels of both miRNAs and their targets: cell-type-specific transcriptomes. In addition, it is important to note that tumorigenesis-related alterations in a cell's transcriptome may also affect the regulatory capacity of miRNAs to the extent that a miRNA variant allele may have a protective effect for disease as well as predict poor prognosis. Functional characterization of miRNA target transcripts is far from complete and there is currently little data available to speculate on cell-type-specific regulation of mRNAs by miR-196a and miR-196a*.
Though there is conflicting data for the association between MIR196A2 genotype and miR-196a expression, the variant allele is in the other mature miRNA product of this gene, miR-196a*. Consistent with our data, Hoffman et al. did not observe an effect of the variant on expression of mature miR-196a* (15). In addition, studies that report significant associations between the MIR196A2 polymorphism and cancer risk; breast, gastric, and non-small-cell lung cancers (in both Caucasian and Asian populations) all show the T allele to be associated with decreased risk of disease (15-18). Collectively, these results strongly suggest that reduced risk associated with MIR196A2 variant genotype is not mediated by differential expression of the gene's mature miRNAs.
In the context of carcinogenesis, the dynamic relationship between a miRNA and its targets may be modified by etiologic exposures. Compounded with cell-type-specific transcriptomes, there are varying etiologic exposures associated with different cancers: in HNSCC etiologic exposures may differ between individuals (within tumor site), and are known to have different magnitudes of effect by tumor site. For instance, HPV16 seropositive individuals have a higher risk of developing pharyngeal disease compared to other sites (3). Further, HPV16 and other important etiologic exposures in HNSCC have been associated with specific molecular alterations that may have broader implications for a cell's transcriptome, and hence, may differentially impact regulation by miRNAs. Nonetheless, we did not observe any effect modification by exposures for genotype associations in this study, suggesting that the precise mechanism(s) by which genotype confers risk is too dynamic and complex to fully elucidate. In addition to more complete characterization of the miRNA targets, further study of additional cancers with similar risk factors (e.g. cervical cancer and HPV and lung cancer and tobacco smoking) might also be helpful in illuminating precisely how these variant genotypes confer risk.
This work suggests that patients carrying a variant allele in MIR196A2 have a significantly decreased risk of HNSCC. In addition, homozygous variant cases with pharyngeal disease also had significantly poorer survival, suggesting that the protective effect of the variant allele does not extend to disease severity. Additional studies are warranted to further confirm these findings and explore the relationship between MIR196A2 genoytpe and risk of other forms of cancer.
Translational Relevance: We find that carriers of a variant allele in MIR196A2 have a significantly decreased risk of developing head and neck cancer compared to wildtype individuals. Further, homozygous variant carriers with pharyngeal disease have significantly reduced survival. Importantly, our evaluation of a mature miRNA polymorphism is an example of a directed approach to investigating a growing category of polymorphic variants in miRNAs and miRNA target sites which will likely have tremendous implications for disease risk and prognosis in all types of human cancer.
Acknowledgments
Support: R01CA078609, R01CA100679, T32ES007272
1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:43–66. [PubMed]
2. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer research. 1988;48:3282–7. [PubMed]
3. Furniss CS, McClean MD, Smith JF, et al. Human papillomavirus 16 and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. International journal of cancer. 2007;120:2386–92. [PubMed]
4. Chang SS, Jiang WW, Smith I, et al. MicroRNA alterations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. International journal of cancer. 2008;123:2791–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
5. Ramdas L, Giri U, Ashorn CL, et al. miRNA expression profiles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and adjacent normal tissue. Head Neck. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Avissar M, Christensen BC, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ. MicroRNA expression ratio is predictive of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2850–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Avissar M, McClean MD, Kelsey KT, Marsit CJ. MicroRNA expression in head and neck cancer associates with alcohol consumption and survival. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:2059–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Childs G, Fazzari M, Kung G, et al. Low-level expression of microRNAs let-7d and miR-205 are prognostic markers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The American journal of pathology. 2009;174:736–45. [PubMed]
9. Liu CJ, Tsai MM, Hung PS, et al. miR-31 Ablates Expression of the HIF Regulatory Factor FIH to Activate the HIF Pathway in Head and Neck Carcinoma. Cancer research. 2010;70:1635–44. [PubMed]
10. Hui AB, Lenarduzzi M, Krushel T, et al. Comprehensive MicroRNA Profiling for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1129–39. [PubMed]
11. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–97. [PubMed]
12. Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:259–69. [PubMed]
13. Chen K, Song F, Calin GA, Wei Q, Hao X, Zhang W. Polymorphisms in microRNA targets: a gold mine for molecular epidemiology. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:1306–11. [PubMed]
14. Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH. Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007;104:3300–5. [PubMed]
15. Hoffman AE, Zheng T, Yi C, et al. microRNA miR-196a-2 and breast cancer: a genetic and epigenetic association study and functional analysis. Cancer research. 2009;69:5970–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Hu Z, Liang J, Wang Z, et al. Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Hum Mutat. 2009;30:79–84. [PubMed]
17. Peng S, Kuang Z, Sheng C, Zhang Y, Xu H, Cheng Q. Association of MicroRNA-196a-2 Gene Polymorphism with Gastric Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 [PubMed]
18. Tian T, Shu Y, Chen J, et al. A functional genetic variant in microRNA-196a2 is associated with increased susceptibility of lung cancer in Chinese. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1183–7. [PubMed]
19. Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T, et al. Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non-small cell lung cancer survival. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2600–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Hsiung DT, Marsit CJ, Houseman EA, et al. Global DNA methylation level in whole blood as a biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:108–14. [PubMed]
21. Peters ES, McClean MD, Marsit CJ, Luckett B, Kelsey KT. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and the synergy of alcohol and tobacco in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:2196–202. [PubMed]
22. Marsit CJ, Black CC, Posner MR, Kelsey KT. A genotype-phenotype examination of cyclin D1 on risk and outcome of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2371–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Mishra PJ, Bertino JR. MicroRNA polymorphisms: the future of pharmacogenomics, molecular epidemiology and individualized medicine. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10:399–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Christensen BC, Moyer BJ, Avissar M, et al. A let-7 microRNA-binding site polymorphism in the KRAS 3′ UTR is associated with reduced survival in oral cancers. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1003–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Nelson HH, Christensen BC, Plaza SL, Wiencke JK, Marsit CJ, Kelsey KT. KRAS mutation, KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism, and non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Ye Y, Wang KK, Gu J, et al. Genetic variations in microRNA-related genes are novel susceptibility loci for esophageal cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res (Phila Pa) 2008;1:460–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Navon R, Wang H, Steinfeld I, Tsalenko A, Ben-Dor A, Yakhini Z. Novel rank-based statistical methods reveal microRNAs with differential expression in multiple cancer types. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8003. [PMC free article] [PubMed]