PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of springeropenLink to Publisher's site
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
 
Dig Dis Sci. 2010 September; 55(9): 2514–2519.
Published online 2009 December 1. doi:  10.1007/s10620-009-1047-2
PMCID: PMC2914281

Local Immune Regulation of Mucosal Inflammation by Tacrolimus

Abstract

Purpose

Tacrolimus is a potent immunomodulator that is effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, potential toxicity and systemic effects with oral intake limit its use. Local tacrolimus treatment is effective in a subgroup of proctitis patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether colonic mucosal immune cells are susceptible to locally applied tacrolimus in vitro. Our in vivo studies aimed at evaluating whether local tacrolimus treatment in mice would bring about local immune suppression and to compare colonic and systemic tacrolimus levels after locally and systemically applied tacrolimus.

Results

In vitro tacrolimus inhibited the activation of multiple cell types present in colonic tissue; lamina propria T cells, NKT cells, and both classical- and non- classical antigen presenting cells. However, the cytokine production of epithelial cells was not inhibited by tacrolimus at these concentrations. After rectal administration in mice, tacrolimus blood levels were comparable to those obtained by oral intake. However, rectally treated mice exhibited a 14-fold higher concentration of tacrolimus within their colonic tissue than orally treated mice. Moreover, rectally applied tacrolimus resulted in a local but not a systemic immune suppression in mice.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus inhibits activation of several pivotal immune cells of the intestinal mucosa. Murine studies indicate that colonic application of tacrolimus induces local rather than systemic immune suppression.

Keywords: Colonic mucosa, Tacrolimus, Local immune suppression, Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Introduction

Calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, are a subset of immunomodulators that potently inhibit lymphocyte proliferation and activation [1]. They are best known for their immunosuppressive capacities in prevention of allograft rejection. In addition, systemic treatment with calcineurin inhibitors has been shown to be effective in the treatment of IBD. However, general systemic immune suppression, potential side-effects (insulin resistance, hypertension, neurological disorders) and potential toxicity (hepatotoxitcity and nephrotoxicity) limit the use of calcineurin inhibitors.

Local treatment of colitis patients by means of enemas or suppositories of various drugs is associated with local efficacy and less systemic side-effects. As such, prednisone and 5-ASA enemas and suppositories are widely prescribed for IBD patients with distal colitis or proctitis. Unfortunately, there is a subset of patients unresponsive to these local treatments, making systemic treatment, with all its side-effects, inevitable. Therefore, there is a need for the development of new local treatments for patients with distal colitis or proctitis.

Tacrolimus, formally known as FK506, is one of the calcineurin inhibitors found to be effective for the systemic treatment of ulcerative colitis [26]. We [7] and others [8] recently described the therapeutic effect of local tacrolimus treatment in patients with therapy-resistant distal colitis in two pilot studies.

The aim of this study was to validate local application of tacrolimus in IBD by studying the immunomodulatory effect of this drug on several classes of immune cells that are implicated in the aberrant mucosal immune responses associated with IBD, e.g., epithelial cells, antigen presenting cells, and lamina propria T cells. A subset of T cells, namely the CD1d-restricted NKT cells, have also been implicated in IBD pathogenesis [9]. Therefore, we also studied the effect of tacrolimus on this specific subset of T cells. Furthermore we assessed the levels of tacrolimus within colonic tissue and the extent of local immune suppression after rectal administration in mice.

Methods

In Vitro Studies

Treatment of Epithelial Cells with Tacrolimus

A colonic epithelial cell line (Caco-2) was pre-incubated for 6 h with a range of tacrolimus (Prograf, Fujisawa) concentrations, from 0 to 100,000 ng/ml, washed three times, and subsequently stimulated with 30 μg/ml peptidoglycan (from bacillus subtilis, Fluka/Sigma-Aldrich). After 24 h of incubation with tacrolimus, IL-8 production was measured in the supernatant by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, OptEIA mouse IL-8 ELISA set, BD Biosciences Pharmingen).

Treatment of (NK)-T Cells with Tacrolimus

Colonic lamina propria mononuclear cells were isolated from naïve BALB/C mice as described earlier [10] and were stimulated ex vivo with 2 μg/ml αCD3 (BD Biosciences, clone 145-2C11) and 2 μg/ml αCD28 (BD Biosciences, clone 37.51) antibodies in the presence of a range of tacrolimus concentrations. After 72 h supernatant was collected and IL-2 concentrations were measured by means of ELISA (OptEIA, human IL-2 ELISA set, BD Biosciences Pharmingen).

A CD1d-restricted NKT cell line (DN32.D3), kindly provided by Richard Blumberg, was pre-treated with a range of tacrolimus concentrations, from 0 to 1,000 ng/ml, for 24 h. Subsequently, NKT cells were stimulated with 5 ng/ml phorbol ester 12-tetradecanoylphorbol-13 acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 ng/ml calcium ionofore (Sigma-Aldrich). After 24 h of stimulation, IL-2 concentrations were measured in the supernatant by means of ELISA.

Treatment of Antigen Presenting Cells with Tacrolimus

Dendritic cells were cultured from BALB/C bone marrow as previously described [11]. Thereafter, the protein ovalbumin (OVA) (calbiochem, EMD biosciences) was added at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and incubated in the presence of a range of tacrolimus concentrations. After 6 h, the DCs were harvested, washed three times with medium, and the viable DCs were counted and plated in a 96-well culture plate. Meanwhile, T cells with an OVA specific T cell receptor were isolated from DO-11-10 mice and labeled with 5 μM CFSE (Molecular Probes). DCs and T cells were co-cultured at a ratio of 1:10 and harvested after 72 h. Proliferation of lymphocytes was determined by flow cytometric analysis (FACStar, BD Biosciences). Thereto, cells were stained with CD4 and Kj (which is the marker for the OVA specific T cell receptor) antibodies (CD4-PE, clone L3T4- GK1.5, BD Biosciences Pharmingen and KJ1-26 anti-TCR-biotin, Caltag, Burlingame, CA, respectively). After FACS measurement, CFSE peaks were analyzed within a CD4/Kj double positive gate. Culture supernatants were analyzed after 72 h for IFN-γ production by means of ELISA (using anti-mouse INF-γ, clone XMG 1.2, Biolegend).

The epithelial cell line T84d, kindly provided by Richard Blumberg, which is an epithelial cell line transfected with the non-classical antigen-presenting molecule CD1d [12, 13], was loaded with 100 ng/ml of the NKT cell-specific lipid antigen α-galactosylceramide (αGalCer, Alexis Biochemicals) in the presence of a range of tacrolimus concentrations. After 18 h of incubation, the epithelial cells were washed three times with medium and subsequently co-cultured at a ratio of 1:1 with NKT cells (of the cell line DN32.D3), which have a αGalCer responsive T cell receptor. After 24 h, the supernatant was collected and IL-2 production was determined by means of ELISA.

In Vivo Studies: Mice

All animal procedures and protocols were performed with the approval of the local institutional animal studies ethics committee. All mice were purchased from Charles-River. At least four animals per treatment group were used.

Tacrolimus Enema Treatment of Naïve Mice

The first experiment was to compare colonic and blood levels of tacrolimus upon oral or intra-rectal tacrolimus treatment. Eight- to ten-week-old BALB/C mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane-gas and 150 μl of tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ml was installed either locally in the colon by means of a catheter or intra-gastrically by means of a oro-gastric gavage. The mice were killed 18 h after drug administration. Blood was collected in EDTA (1.5 mg/ml) and the colon was divided into a proximal part and a distal part. Tissue was homogenized in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 μg/ml leupeptin (Sigma-Aldrich), 200 mU/ml aprotinin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 20 μg/ml phenyl methyl sulphonyl fluoride [14] using a Polytron homogenizer (PT1200, Kinematica AG, Switzerland). Protein levels were then determined in colonic homogenates using the Pierce Bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA, Interchim). Subsequently, tacrolimus levels were determined in 1 mg colonic protein and in blood using a tacrolimus ELISA (PRO-Trac II, Diasorin).

A second experiment was setup to determine whether immune suppression was achieved at 18 h of local administration of tacrolimus. Eight- to ten-week-old BALB/C mice were anaesthetized by isoflurane-gas and 150 μl of tacrolimus 0 or 1 mg/ml was installed in the colon. The mice were killed after 18 h and lamina propria lymphocytes—(LPL), iliac lymph node—(ILN), mesenteric lymph node—(MLN) and spleen-lymphocytes were isolated and subsequently cultured and stimulated with 2 μg/ml αCD3 and 2 μg/ml αCD28 antibodies as described previously [10]. After 72 h, the supernatant was collected and IL-2 concentration was measured by means of ELISA.

Results

Tacrolimus Inhibits Activity of Local T Cells and Antigen-Presenting Cells but Leaves Epithelial Cells Unaffected In Vitro

To study whether tacrolimus is able to directly affect cells that are present in the colonic mucosa, the immunomodulatory effects were studied in vitro on several cell lines and ex vivo isolated cells.

First, the immunomodulatory effect of tacrolimus on colonic epithelial cells was evaluated. Caco-2 cells that were pretreated with tacrolimus before stimulation with peptidoglycan did not show an inhibition of their capacity to produce the chemokine IL-8 (Fig. 1a). Importantly, tacrolimus did not cause an increase of epithelial cell death at any of the used tacrolimus concentrations (data not shown).

Fig. 1
Tacrolimus inhibits the activity of mucosal T cells and antigen-presenting cells but leaves epithelial cells unaffected in vitro.Asterisks indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05), bars represent the mean of at least ...

Second, the effect of tacrolimus on local subsets of T cells was evaluated. First, we aimed to determine whether local lymphocytes were susceptible to immunomodulatory effects of tacrolimus in vitro. LPLs isolated from murine colon and stimulated with αCD3 and αCD28 antibodies ex vivo in the presence of tacrolimus display a total blockade of their IL-2 production at a dose of 10 ng/ml tacrolimus (Fig. 1b). The activation of an NKT cell line stimulated by a phorbol ester was inhibited by tacrolimus in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1c).

Third, the effect of tacrolimus on antigen presentation was evaluated as this process is crucially implicated in colonic inflammation. Thereto, DCs were loaded with the protein antigen OVA in the presence or absence of tacrolimus prior to consecutive incubation with T cells that have an OVA-specific T cell receptor (DO11-10 T cells). DCs treated with tacrolimus were less able to stimulate T cells to proliferate and produce IFN-γ. After 72 h of co-incubation with tacrolimus, pre-treated DCs T cells showed a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of undivided cells (Fig. 1d, e) and a dose-dependent decrease of their IFN-γ production (Fig. 1f). This inhibitory effect of tacrolimus on antigen presentation did not seem to be restricted to classical protein antigen presentation since the same results were obtained when this experiment was performed in a system that is independent of classical MHC (-II) presentation but dependent of a lipid non-classical Cd1d-restricted pathway (Fig. 1g).

Colonic Application of Tacrolimus Results in Local Retention and Local Immune Suppression

We compared colonic and systemic tacrolimus levels after oral administration, which is the common route for systemic therapy, and after intra-rectal administration. As demonstrated by Fig. 2a, blood levels of intra-rectal treated mice are similar to blood levels of orally treated mice after 18 h of treatment. Importantly, upon rectal administration, a 14-fold higher concentration of tacrolimus was reached within colonic tissue in comparison to oral administration (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
Colonic application of tacrolimus in mice results in mainly local presence of the drug and local immune suppression. a Mice were treated with 150 μl of tacrolimus (0.1 mg/ml) either intrarectally or intragastrically. Eighteen hours ...

To study immunomodulatory effects after local treatment with tacrolimus ILN-, LPL-, MLN- and spleen lymphocytes were isolated from rectal tacrolimus-treated mice after 18 h. These cells were stimulated polyclonally ex vivo with αCD3 and αCD28 antibodies. After 48 h of stimulation, IL-2 concentration was measured in the supernatant. Lymphocytes derived from colon draining ILNs of tacrolimus-treated mice show a significant inhibition of IL-2 production compared to lymphocytes of the saline-treated mice. Lymphocytes derived from the lamina propria of mice treated with tacrolimus also displayed less IL-2 production than lamina propria T cells from mice treated with saline only, albeit not significantly. Local tacrolimus treatment did not affect the IL-2 production of spleen or MLN-derived lymphocytes (Fig. 2b).

Discussion

In these studies we sought substantiation of tacrolimus as a local therapeutic in IBD patients. First we established that tacrolimus elicits a potent immunosuppressive effect on several mucosal immune cells that are crucially implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD. As such, our in vitro experiments show that IL-2 production of both lamina propria T cells as well as an NKT cell line was strongly inhibited by tacrolimus in a dose-dependent fashion. Notably, recent work has implicated that NKT cells play an important role in the IBD pathogenesis and these cells may therefore serve as a new target for immunomodulatory therapy in IBD. The suppression of IL-2 is a well-known feature of calcineurin inhibitors. Also, systemic tacrolimus administration has been linked to mucosal immune suppression in previous work [15], however, the direct effect on the normally resilient mucosal T cells and NKT cells had not been studied earlier.

Interestingly, we observed that the activation of T cells or NKT cells could also be inhibited indirectly by targeting antigen-presenting cells with tacrolimus. Both MHC class II restricted and non-restricted antigen presentation was strongly inhibited by tacrolimus. It has been suggested earlier that tacrolimus inhibits the T cell stimulatory capacity of DCs [1618]. Here we show that this concept can be extended to non-classical ways of lipid antigen presentation. The mechanism behind these observations has yet to be clarified but may also involve calcineurin-dependent processes. Calcineurin inhibitors specifically affect lymphocytes as their activation critically depends on a restricted amount of the phosphatase. At higher (local) concentrations of tacrolimus the activity of the drug may be less restricted to lymphocytes and also affect cells that are less dependent on calcineurin [19, 20]. Importantly, we did not observe any suppressive effects of tacrolimus on the responsiveness of epithelial cells to bacterial peptidoglycan. The latter suggests that one of the hallmarks of mucosal homeostasis that is microbial sensing by the epithelium will remain intact during tacrolimus treatment.

A next step in our studies was to prove that locally applied tacrolimus is retained in the mucosa and elicits its immune suppression only at the local site of application. We found that rectal application of tacrolimus yielded much higher mucosal levels of this drug compared to oral treatment whereas systemic levels were quite similar with both administration routes. This implicates that much lower doses of tacrolimus are required to obtain a therapeutic level in the colon after local application than after systemic application, which limits systemic tacrolimus levels. This experiment illustrates that there is a difference in mucosal levels, depending on the route of administration. As there are pharmacokinetic differences between mice and humans, we decided not to extend in this current protocol. For further insight into (mucosal) tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, human studies should be performed.

As anticipated, mice treated with tacrolimus rectally displayed inhibited immune responses of cells derived from the local draining lymph nodes, whereas more distal (mesenteric lymph nodes) and concurrent systemic (spleen) immune responses remained intact. These data confirm that tacrolimus is indeed retained and active in the mucosa at the local site of application. A proper dose-finding study in humans should reveal which dosage is best suited for use in patients.

These studies show that tacrolimus has potent immune-suppressive capacities when applied directly upon the mucosa. In vitro, it potently inhibits activation of lamina propria (NK)T cells and of both classical as well as non-classical antigen presentation, while leaving epithelial microbial defense intact. In vivo application of tacrolimus in murine colons yielded an inhibited local T cell response ex vivo, while leaving systemic T cell responses intact. High colonic levels of tacrolimus were reached after rectal administration in comparison to systemic (oral) treatment in mice. This implicates that lower doses of tacrolimus may be used in local application, limiting systemic side-effects. These data provide a rationale to further study local application of tacrolimus in IBD patients.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank L. de Ruiter of the Laboratory of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC Rotterdam for laboratory support.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

1. Dieren JM, Kuipers EJ, Samsom JN, Nieuwenhuis EE, Woude CJ. Revisiting the immunomodulators tacrolimus, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil: their mechanisms of action and role in the treatment of IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:311–327. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000209787.19952.53. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
2. Baumgart DC, Wiedenmann B, Dignass AU. Rescue therapy with tacrolimus is effective in patients with severe and refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:1273–1281. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01534.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Bousvaros A, Kirschner BS, Werlin SL, Parker-Hartigan L, Daum F, Freeman KB, Balint JP, Day AS, Griffiths AM, Zurakowski D, Ferry GD, Leichtner AM. Oral tacrolimus treatment of severe colitis in children. J Pediatr. 2000;137:794–799. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2000.109193. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Fellermann K, Tanko Z, Herrlinger KR, Witthoeft T, Homann N, Bruening A, Ludwig D, Stange EF. Response of refractory colitis to intravenous or oral tacrolimus (FK506) Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002;8:317–324. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200209000-00002. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Hogenauer C, Wenzl HH, Hinterleitner TA, Petritsch W. Effect of oral tacrolimus (FK 506) on steroid-refractory moderate/severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18:415–423. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01662.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Ogata H, Matsui T, Nakamura M, Iida M, Takazoe M, Suzuki Y, Hibi T. A randomised, dose-finding study of oral tacrolimus (FK506) therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2006;55:1255–1262. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.081794. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Dieren JM, Bodegraven AA, Kuipers EJ, Bakker EN, Poen AC, van DH, Nieuwenhuis EE, Woude CJ. Local application of tacrolimus in distal colitis: feasible and safe. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009;15:193–198. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20644. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
8. Lawrance IC, Copeland TS. Rectal tacrolimus in the treatment of resistant ulcerative proctitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:1214–1220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03841.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Fuss IJ, Heller F, Boirivant M, Leon F, Yoshida M, Fichtner-Feigl S, Yang Z, Exley M, Kitani A, Blumberg RS, Mannon P, Strober W. Nonclassical CD1d-restricted NK T cells that produce IL-13 characterize an atypical Th2 response in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1490–1497. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
10. Koning BA, Dieren JM, Lindenbergh-Kortleve DJ, Sluis M, Matsumoto T, Yamaguchi K, Einerhand AW, Samsom JN, Pieters R, Nieuwenhuis EE. Contributions of mucosal immune cells to methotrexate-induced mucositis. Int Immunol. 2006;18:941–949. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxl030. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
11. Samsom JN, Berkel LA, Helvoort JM, Unger WW, Jansen W, Thepen T, Mebius RE, Verbeek SS, Kraal G. Fc gamma RIIB regulates nasal and oral tolerance: a role for dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2005;174:5279–5287. [PubMed]
12. Hershberg RM, Framson PE, Cho DH, Lee LY, Kovats S, Beitz J, Blum JS, Nepom GT. Intestinal epithelial cells use two distinct pathways for HLA class II antigen processing. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:204–215. doi: 10.1172/JCI119514. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
13. Hershberg RM, Cho DH, Youakim A, Bradley MB, Lee JS, Framson PE, Nepom GT. Highly polarized HLA class II antigen processing and presentation by human intestinal epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:792–803. doi: 10.1172/JCI3201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
14. Arya R, Grossie VB, Jr, Weisbrodt NW, Lai M, Mailman D, Moody F. Temporal expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitric oxide synthase 2 in rat small intestine after endotoxin. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:744–749. doi: 10.1023/A:1005499811649. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
15. Elitsur Y, Liu X, Dosescu J, Moshier JA. FK-506 and cyclosporine A (CsA) immunomodulation of the human gut mucosal immune system. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:1934–1940. doi: 10.1007/BF02208660. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
16. Tiefenthaler M, Hofer S, Ebner S, Ivarsson L, Neyer S, Herold M, Mayer G, Fritsch P, Heufler C. In vitro treatment of dendritic cells with tacrolimus: impaired T-cell activation and IP-10 expression. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:553–560. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg594. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Cos J, Villalba T, Parra R, Gallardo D, Bilbao I, Margarit C, Massuet L. FK506 in the maturation of dendritic cells. Haematologica. 2002;87:679–687. [PubMed]
18. Lee YR, Yang IH, Lee YH, Im SA, Song S, Li H, Han K, Kim K, Eo SK, Lee CK. Cyclosporin A and tacrolimus, but not rapamycin, inhibit MHC-restricted antigen presentation pathways in dendritic cells. Blood. 2005;105:3951–3955. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3927. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
19. Crabtree GR. Generic signals and specific outcomes: signaling through Ca2+, calcineurin, and NF-AT. Cell. 1999;96:611–614. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80571-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Klee CB, Ren H, Wang X. Regulation of the calmodulin-stimulated protein phosphatase, calcineurin. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13367–13370. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.22.13367. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]

Articles from Springer Open Choice are provided here courtesy of Springer