PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptNIH Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
 
Blood Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC Aug 2, 2010.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2913579
NIHMSID: NIHMS175402
Autologous blood cell therapies from pluripotent stem cells
Claudia Lengerke1 and George Q. Daley2
1Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center II, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany
2Stem Cell Transplantation Program, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children′s Hospital; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School; Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA
Address for correspondence: Claudia Lengerke, MD, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Tuebingen Medical Center II, Otfried-Mueller-Str. 10, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany, Phone: +49-7071-2982912, Fax: +49-7071-294524, claudia.lengerke/at/med.uni-tuebingen.de, George Q. Daley, MD, PhD, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children′s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, 02115 Boston, MA, USA, Phone: 617-919-2015, Fax: 617-730-0222, george.daley/at/childrens.harvard.edu
The discovery of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) raised promises for a universal resource for cell based therapies in regenerative medicine. Recently, fast-paced progress has been made towards the generation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) amenable for clinical applications, culminating in reprogramming of adult somatic cells to autologous PSCs that can be indefinitely expanded in vitro. However, besides the efficient generation of bona fide, clinically safe PSCs (e.g. without the use of oncoproteins and gene transfer based on viruses inserting randomly into the genome), a major challenge in the field remains how to efficiently differentiate PSCs to specific lineages and how to select for cells that will function normally upon transplantation in adults. In this review, we analyse the in vitro differentiation potential of PSCs to the hematopoietic lineage discussing blood cell types that can be currently obtained, limitations in derivation of adult-type HSCs and prospects for clinical application of PSCs-derived blood cells.
Keywords: human embryonic stem cells, ESC, induced pluripotent stem cells, iPS, differentiation, hematopoietic stem cells, blood, transplantation, autologous, isogenic, erythrocytes, NK cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes
Studies on pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) started almost three decades ago with the discovery of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) by Martin1 and Evans2. mESC can differentiate into every tissue of the adult body: when reinjected in the developing embryo, mESCs chimaerize all tissues, including the germline. Over the last years, ESC technology has been extensively used for genetic manipulation of the mouse genome and creation of mutant mouse strains, rendering enormously valuable insights into genetic regulation of tissue function and disease pathogenesis. The discovery of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in 19983 opened up exciting prospects for the use of ESC in regenerative medicine. Several organs of the adult are dependent on a stem cell pool for maintainance, and malignant or degenerative disorders affecting this cellular compartment might be treated with stem cell replacement therapies. The most prominent example is the hematopoietic system, where transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)4 is a well-established clinical tool in the treatment of malignant (e.g. leukemia and lymphoma) or genetic blood diseases (e.g. Fanconi′s Anemia, immunodeficiency and hemoglobinopathy). More recently, stem cells have been identified in several other tissues of the adult (e.g. skin, gut, nervous system, lung, mammary gland). However, adult stem cells are rare, and despite attempts to drive ex vivo expansion, adult stem cells including HSCs remain difficult to maintain and proliferate in culture. In contrast, ESCs can be indefinitely expanded in an undifferentiated state, providing limitless amounts of cellular material. Advances in the generation of patient-specific PSCs5 open up prospects for autologous cellular therapies that would lack immune rejection. However, directed differentiation of PSCs into tissues of interest remains challenging. Despite intensive efforts, currently available in vitro differentiation protocols offer limited recapitulation of embryonic development and obtaining adult-type tissue progenitors that will function normally upon transplantation remains difficult. In this review, we discuss possible sources of histocompatible PSCs, analyse in vitro blood differentiation from such pluripotent cells, and discuss prospects for therapeutical applications.
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the best established clinical cellular replacement therapy, dating back to 1957 when Thomas and colleagues first reported intravenous infusions of bone marrow in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy4. In the ensuing decades transplantation of allogeneic HLA-matched bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells has become the standard therapy for patients suffering from a variety of malignant or genetic disorders of the hematopoietic cell compartment. However, allogeneic HSCT is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality related to graft rejection, acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), as well as infections occuring during the transition period before transplanted HSCs take over blood cell function. Autologous HSCT, in which a patient′s own stem cells are harvested prior to high-dose chemotherapy, is less toxic because there is no GvHD and more rapid engraftment translates into lower rates of infectious complications. However, in patients with genetic conditions such as sickle cell anemia and thalassemia, autologous therapies necessitate correction of the genetic defect by gene therapy in the patient′s HSCs, which is cumbersome due to the challenges of maintaining HSCs in culture, the intrinsic difficulties of expressing genes in HSCs, and the risk of insertional mutagenesis after gene transfer with viral vectors6. In contrast, generating patient′s own PSCs, and using for example homologous recombination to correct genetic defects prior to differentiation into transplantable HSCs promises to overcome caveats of conventional HSCT therapies.
Classically obtained ESCs3 would face immune barriers when transplanted into (genetically non-identical) hosts. While ESCs themselves express only low levels of MHC antigens, these levels increase strongly during differentiation7, and grafts composed of ESC-derived progeny would provoke immune reactions and face rejection upon transplantation in genetically mismatched hosts. Thus, much effort has been invested to generate histocompatible PSCs. Early work by Briggs and Gurdon in the 1950s8 and 1960s9,10 demonstrated that replacing the nucleus of frog oocytes with nuclei from somatic cells enables development of organisms expressing the genetic information of the somatic cell donor. This principle has been successfully applied in some mammalian species where nuclear transfer (NT)-embryos have been used to derive ESC lines. NT-ESCs are isogenic with the somatic cell donor, and thus a source of histocompatible transplant tissue. Rideout and colleagues performed a proof of principle experiment in an immunodeficiency mouse model, showing that such cells can be used for treatment of genetic disease: NT-ESCs were generated from Rag2-/- mice; the genetic defect was corrected by homologous recombination; and the resulting ESCs differentiated in vitro into repopulating HSCs11 capable of restoring immune function upon transplantation into Rag2-/- mice12.
Nuclear transfer is an elegant method for the generation of isogenic cellular products13, but the downside of this procedure is its very low efficiency. To our knowledge, derivation of human NT-ESCs has not yet succeeded, although there is one report on successful generation of human blastocysts via NT14 (reviewed in15). Human NT faces ethical concerns, and is further burdened by the high numbers of human oocytes that are needed as recipient cells. A more efficient method rendering histocompatible PSCs is direct oocyte activation in a process called parthenogenesis16. Parthenogenetic cells are genetically similar, but not identical to the oocyte donor. Tissue products from parthenogenetic sources may be homozygous17,18, and thus susceptible to rejection through natural killer cells which recognize the missing antigens upon transplantation into the oocyte donor. However, by analysing high numbers of mouse parthenogenetic ESC lines derived in our laboratory, we found a surprisingly high degree of histocompatibility due to heterozygosity at the MHC loci, based on early recombination events during oocyte maturation16. However, histocompatible parthenogenetic ESCs would be only available for women capable of oocyte donation, and further analysis should inform whether imprinting aspects biases their differentiation into specific tissues.
During NT somatic cell nuclei are reprogrammed by the ooplasma. Significant effort has been expended to identify the mechanisms underlying these processes, in an attempt to replace the ooplasm effect by defined factors. In 2006, Takahashi and Yamanaka presented ground-breaking results from a screen on a mini-library of embryonic factors for their effect on somatic cells19: While single factors were ineffective, combinatorial retroviral transduction with four defined factors known from ESC biology (Oct3/4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4) was able to reprogram mouse fibroblasts to cells that resembled ESCs both functionally and molecularly19. The reprogrammed cells could be expanded as cell lines and were termed induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Shortly after the initial report, three independent research groups replicated these results with human cells20-22. During the last year and a half, a multitude of studies from numerous research groups has reported derivation of reprogrammed PSCs in mouse and human, using different somatic cells as starting populations (e.g. liver and stomach cells23, neural stem cells24,25, pancreatic beta cells26, B-lymphocytes27 and, most recently, human mobilized CD34+ cells from peripheral blood28), transduction with different embryonic factors, treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors29 or small molecules30, in an attempt to develop protocols devoid of oncoproteins and integrating viruses31-34 (reviewed in 15) that can be translated into clinical application.
Pluripotent stem cells have also been isolated from mouse and human embryonic gonads35,36 and more recently from postnatal testis37-40. Gonads-derived cells have been shown to form derivatives of all three germ layers and differentiate into hematopoietic cells41. To our knowledge, a careful analysis of their potential to generate distinct blood progenitors and a comparison with pluripotent stem cells from other sources is currently missing. Origin and characteristics of currently available pluripotent stem cells are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
Table 1
Origin, properties and hematopoietic potency of different pluripotent stem cells
ESCs transplanted into immunodeficient murine recipients form teratomas, demonstrating their pluripotency. Thus, to obtain specific transplantable tissues, PSCs need to be predifferentiated in vitro. When removed from the specific culture conditions that sustain their self-renewal, ESCs spontaneously form cystic structures termed embryoid bodies (EBs) that contain derivatives of the three germ layers, including blood cells42. The presence of serum in the differentiation medium provides a mixture of growth factors that allows development of several lineages. This procedure clearly demonstrates the in vitro developmental potency of ESCs, but has some important disadvantages: (1) the efficiency of differentiation into specific lineages is highly variable; (2) selection for the cells of interest (e.g. by surface antigens) is required prior to transplantation; last but not least (3) the presence of bovine serum hampers clinical applications requiring protocols free of contaminating animal products.
To drive tissue formation from ESCs and to progress towards directed differentiation protocols using defined serum-free conditions, it is essential to follow a developmental biology approach (reviewed in 43,44). From a developmental standpoint, ESCs are the equivalent of early epiblast cells and recapitulate in vitro aspects of early embryogenesis: guided by morphogens (e.g. Wnt, TGF-beta, Activin and BMP). ESCs progress through a primitive-streak like stage before forming the three germ layers, endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm45, which is the layer giving rise to blood. While early embryonic stages are quite faithfully mimicked46, spontaneously differentiating EBs may not offer ideal conditions for the refined processes occuring later in development. EBs lack the anatomical structure of the embryo, and cells developing in EBs do not participate accurately in embryonic cell-to-cell interactions, and miss certain cell non-autonomous effects and exposure to physical stimuli that physiologically occur at specific stages of development (as for example the flow pressure and cellular movement occuring with onset of embryonic circulation47). It is likely that in vitro differentiating ESCs are prone to generate immature, embryonic-type progenitor cells, that may not function properly upon transplantation in adults. However, these apparent inconveniences at the same time harbour the chance that – assuming specific embryonic differentiation cues are identified and provided in vitro – large homogenous populations of cells can be generated in this system. Therefore, in vivo studies of embryonic development in mice, or in developmental models such as zebrafish, Xenopus or chick remain a key approaches towards learning how to generate adult-type cells from ESC.
Another hurdle towards generation of ready-to-use adult-type cells from human PSC are the assays available for the evaluation of human cells. Human cells are less characterized than murine (for example with respect to surface antigens or molecular signature) and functional evaluation is confined to surrogate xenogeneic models which can introduce biases and not always faithfully reflect cell function. For example, human HSCs transplanted into mice rely on mouse cytokines and niche factors with only limited cross-reactivity to human cells48, while human heart grafts in rodent models are exposed to atypically high heart beat frequences. Such environmental factors bias functional evaluation of the cells and may contribute to reported differences between mouse and human cells. HSCs showing long-term engraftment were obtained from murine ESCs11, and iPS cells49 using transduction with Hoxb4 and coculture on OP9 stromal cells, while human HSCs could not be produced following similar protocols50.
In many transplant protocols, using iPS cells would be advantageous as the derived cells would be isogenic and would not face immune barriers in the host. The pluripotent nature of mouse iPS cells51 has been demonstrated by blastocyst chimaerisation and tetraploid complementation assays, and the proof of principle experiment that such cells can be used for providing isogenic, genetically corrected cellular products has been performed in a sickle-cell anemia mouse model49. Undifferentiated human iPS cells show a molecular signature highly similar to human ESC20-22, and hESC-protocols can be used to drive their in vitro differentiation into derivatives of the three germ layers22. However, critical issues such as viral integration and residual levels of transgene expression52 may impact the differentiation potential of iPS cells. Obviously, individual reprogramming protocols can introduce distinct biases (e.g. through use of different embryonic proteins, higher transgene persistence after use of lentiviral versus retroviral vectors, off-target effects of small molecules)51. Detailed characterization of the ability of human iPS cells to form specific tissues and functional characterization of the resulting cells is still in its infancy. However, recent studies provide encouraging evidence that generation of cardiomyocytes52, adipocytes53 and hematopoietic and endothelial cells is similar between human ESCs and human iPS20,21,54. Data from our laboratory supports these observations, showing robust blood cell formation that could be further enhanced by bone morphogenetic 4 supplementation (BMP4) in differentiating human iPS cells generated by a separate protocol22 (Lengerke et al, in press). Since only scant data currently available on the differentiation potential of human iPS cells, in this review we will highlight results reported on differentiating hESCs.
When attempting to differentiate pluripotent stem cells into adult-type blood cells, we need to assess how differentiating EBs recapitulate embryonic hematopoietic development. Hematopoietic and endothelial cells both arise from the mesodermal germ layer. Common precursors called “hemangioblasts” have been found in early stage mouse conceptuses55 and clonally identified in in vitro differentiating mouse and human ESCs56-58. Moreover, vertebrate hematopoiesis occurs in two successive waves, primitive and definitive, that differ anatomically and in cell types produced. In the mouse, primitive (embryonic) blood develops transiently in the extraembryonic yolk sac, giving rise to the first blood cells consisting mainly of nucleated erythrocytes and macrophages. The definitive blood program occurs subsequently at intraembryonic sites, and lasts the life of the organism, producing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) capable of extensive self-renewal and multilineage differentiation into all blood lineages.44,59,60 Recent studies suggest that hematopoietic cells arise from hemangioblasts through a hemogenic endothelial intermediate, and show by time-lapse microscopy hemogenic endothelium from in vitro differentiating mouse ESCs as well as early mouse embryos61,62. It is unclear at this point whether endothelial cells giving rise to primitive blood cells differ from those producing definitive blood cells.
Whether definitive HSCs arise in the yolk sac has been debated for decades. The first experiments aiming to trace the origin of blood cells were performed by Moore and Owen: chick embryo where grafted onto a donor yolk sac, and after several days of incubation, donor yolk sac derived hematopoietic cells were found in the hematopoietic organs of the recipient embryo, demonstrating the ability of yolk sac cells to participate in definitive hematopoiesis.63,64 However, these experiments were performed after the onset of circulation, and contamination from circulating HSCs was possible: with the onset of blood flow, cells from intraembryonic sites migrate back to the yolk sac, which then might contain definitive HSCs. Repetition of the avian grafting experiments using precirculation yolk sacs detected no contribution to host embryo hematopoiesis, arguing that indeed adult HSCs arise solely from an intraembryonic location65-67. Analyses indentified intraembryonic blood sites within the chick aortic endothelium68 and cells displaying hallmark properties of adult HSCs (long-term repopulation and multilineage differentiation upon transplantation in irradiated adult hosts) in the murine aorto-gonado-mesonephros region (AGM)69,70. However, cells from precirculation murine yolk sacs can also give rise to definitive HSCs, if they are transplanted into the supportive environment of the fetal liver of newborn mice71,72.
Analysis of in vitro differentiating PSCs reveale a close resemblance to in vivo embryonic processes46,73,74: supplementation of PSCs cultures with morphogens and inductive signals known from in vivo developmental models (e.g. zebrafish, frog, chick) enables directed differentiation in the absence of serum-containing medium46 (reviewed in 44). When directed by morphogens like bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), Wingless (Wnt) and Activin, ES cells develop into cells equivalent to the primitive streak, and give rise to cells of the three germ layers (ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm)45. Gene expression analysis distinguishes between the formation of anterior primitive streak-like cells, developing mostly into endoderm, and posterior primitive streak-like cells that will differentiate into mesoderm and from there through activation of patterning genes (e.g. Cdx/Hox), into hemangioblasts45 and blood cells. Mouse hemangioblasts express the mesodermal marker Brachyury and can be identified around day 3 in differentiating EBs by expression of fetal liver kinase 1 (Flk1)58. Human hemangioblasts56 are phenotypically less well described, yet are found in the CD34+CD45- cellular population75 and express KDR (VEGF receptor 2)56, CD3176, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE/CD143)77. With maturation along the blood lineage, these progenitors start expressing the hematopoietic antigen CD4578. Emergence of CD34+CD45+ cells correlates with derivation of hematopoietic progenitor cells with colony forming unit (CFU) potential in methycellulose assays, and sorting for CD34+CD45+ cells enriches for cells giving rise to hematopoietic colonies76.
Two different protocols, or combinations of them, can be used for generating hematopoietic progenitors from PSCs: (1) formation of embryoid bodies (EBs) and (2) culture on supportive stromal layers79 (e.g. OP9-stromal cells, reviewed in 44). What type of hematopoietic progenitors are routinely generated from ESCs remains an intriguing question. Most probably, ESCs readily give rise to yolk-sac-type progenitors, generating primitive erythroid cells as well as macrophages, definitive erythroid cells, megakaryocytes and mast cell lineages, and do not routinely differentiate into specific lymphoid cells or true hematopoietic stem cells (HSC). However, if exposed to specific conditions, ESCs do form B-80 and T-81 lymphoid cells. Thus, even though yolk-sac-type hematopoiesis is predominant, definitive hematopoietic cells may be obtained from in vitro differentiating ESCs.
The ultimate goal remains generating “off-the-shelf” PSC-derived human HSCs that will be capable of repopulation and durable reconstitution of the entire human hematopoietic system in adults. There are several reports on murine ESC-derived hematopoietic elements capable of longterm multilineage engraftment (reviewed in 44, Figure 1). Burt and colleagues reported formation of c-kit+CD45+ transplantable hematopoietic progenitors, capable of longterm multilineage reconstitution of mice, following culture of mESCs in methylcellulose in the presence of serum, stem cell factor, IL-3 and IL-682. Importantly, direct delivery to the bone marrow via intrafemoral instillation enabled significantly higher numbers of engrafted cells, as compared to intravenous application in the tail vein82. These findings are consistent with results from other studies documenting the superiority of intra-bone marrow over intravenous transplantation83,84, and suggest that providing direct contact with the niche may be especially important for developmentally immature stem cells. Interestingly, applying high numbers of purified c-kit+CD45+ cells enabled engraftment even in MHC-mismatched mice, without signs of graft rejection of induction of GvHD. Tolerance induction through high numbers of transplanted material may be another advantage offered by the PSC-system. However, the encouraging results reported in this study have not been yet independently replicated, as they also have not for the early study of Palacios and colleagues who reported back in 1995 robust multilineage repopulation following co-culture with the stromal cell line RP01085. In this latter case, replication of results has been hampered by the fact that RP010 cells are not readily available.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Blood cells from pluripotent stem cells
Co-culture with stromal cell lines (e.g. derived from AGM or fetal liver, where HSC form and expand during their in vivo embryonic development) is an appealing way of promoting maturation and expansion of PSC-derived blood progenitors. A prominent example is the well-known co-culture with OP9-stromal cells, which provides a supportive microenvironment50, generating enhanced hematopoietic activity and promoting lymphogenesis. OP9-stromal cells are derived from the calvariae of newborn op/op mice which lack macrophage colony stimulating-factor (M-CSF)86. The absence of M-CSF inhibits the survival of monocyte-macrophage cells, which otherwise overwhelm other lineages. If, in addition to co-culture on OP9-stromal cell, enforced expression of the patterning genes Cdx4/HoxB4 is performed, it is possible to generate true ESC-derived murine HSCs, capable of robust multilineage hematopoietic reconstitution in irradiated adult mice11,50,87. Several groups have reported production of repopulating HSCs following genetic modification of mESC-progenitors with the homeobox gene HoxB4 and expansion on OP9-stroma cells11,24,88. Following this protocol, repopulating murine HSC have been efficiently generated also from pluripotent stem cells of different origin (e.g. parthenogenetic89 and reprogrammed iPS cells49, Table 1). Homeobox (Hox) genes are transcription factors involved in embryonic tissue patterning processes, and play important roles in developmental hematopoiesis as well as homeostasis and malignant transformation of adult blood cells (reviewed in 90). Particularly HoxB4 has been shown to enhance self-renewal and/or growth activity of hematopoietic progenitors and HSCs in mouse and human cells91-93. In immature murine yolk-sac or ESC-derived hematopoietic progenitors, enforced HoxB4 expression renders competence for longterm multi-lineage engraftment of irradiated adult hosts11. However, for reasons that are not clear, lymphoid engraftment appears less robust than myeloid engraftment in these cells. Possibly, persisting HoxB4 overexpression biases further differentiation potential of the transplanted cells away from the lymphoid lineage88. Engraftment rates, especially also engraftment with lymphoid cells, can be enhanced by combinatorial transduction with Cdx4, a homeobox transcription factor of the caudal homeobox gene family. cdx genes have been first discovered as early patterning regulators of hematopoietic fate in zebrafish and later shown to promote hematopoiesis from murine ESC through regulation of downstream posterior Hox genes74,87,94-97. Moreover, recent studies suggest CDX genes involvement in human leukemogenesis of the myeloid as well of the lymphoid lineage98-101, reinforcing the notion that molecular pathways are shared between developmental and adult hematopoiesis (as seen also with Hox genes). However, this approach requires genetic modification and has not been successful with human cells: co-culture with OP9 and transduction with HoxB4 cells promotes hematopoietic activity from human ESCs, by inhibiting apoptosis of ESCs-derived CD34+CD45+ cells; however, it does not confer stem cell function to human progenitors (see below)50. Recently, Ledran and colleagues reported that culture of human ESC on a number of stromal cell lines and primary cells derived from the AGM and fetal liver significantly enhanced hematopoietic activity, including hematopoietic engraftment capacity into immunocompromised mice in primary and secondary transplant assays79. However, further studies are needed to confirm these data and to improve chimaerism.
While transduction with HoxB4 and/or Cdx4 promotes robust engraftment, cells exhibiting the classical surface antigen phenotype of engraftable murine HSC (c-kit+Sca1+Lin-) have not yet been reported in this system. To our knowledge, CD41 is the earliest antigen characterizing preformed embryonic blood progenitors, as assayed by in vitro colony forming assays and gene expression data96,102 from murine ESC and mouse embryos. In day 6 EB, hematopoietic activity is confined to cells expressing CD41+, which represent approximately 30% of EB-derived under differentiation in serum containing medium. Within the CD41+ compartment, colony forming activity is highly enriched among CD41+c-kit+ double positive cells, suggesting that c-kit marks cells with stem/progenitor capacity and may be downregulated with differentiation (CD41+ckit- cells). Only CD41+(c-kit+) cells are able to form colonies on OP9-stroma cells, which is a necessary step in the development of transplantable cells. Ectopic expression of Cdx4 enhances the hematopoietic activity of CD41+ckit+ cells, without conferring hematopoietic potential to CD41- cells96. The panhematopoietic antigen CD45 appears shortly after CD41 (day 6.5 to 7 in differentiating EB), presumably indicating conversion of CD41+ cells to more mature progenitors. However, colony forming potential declines with appearance of CD45, suggesting that further development in EB rapidly promotes terminal differentiation of the CD41+ progenitor cells (Lengerke C, unpublished observation). Recent comparison of the phenotype of ESC-derived repopulating HSCs with hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells derived from distinct in vivo developmental stages (murine yolk sac, aorta-gonad-mesonephros, placenta, fetal liver and bone marrow) suggests that ESC-derived HSCs are a developmentally immature population of cells with features of both primitive and mature HSC, defined as ckit+CD41+CD34-CD150+CD45+/-CD48+/-)103. Further studies are needed to characterize these cells from human ESCs.
Generating human HSC from hESC remains challenging (Table 3). As in the murine system, human ESC differentiate robustly into the hematopoietic lineage in EBs, as well as in co-culture systems with supportive stromal cells. Cells with features resembling adult-type HSC are produced: e.g. CD34+ expression, the ability to efflux Hoechst dye, high aldheyde dehydrogenase activity and multilineage hematopoietic colony potential in clonal assays104. However, very limited repopulation ability is observed in xenogeneic transplant assays105. HoxB4 enhances hematopoietic activity of human blood progenitor cells93, and OP9-stromal cell co-cultures augment survival of hESC-derived CD34+CD45+ hematopoietic precursors. However, neither HoxB4 transduction nor OP9-stroma co-culture were able to confer HSC activity to hESC-derived cells50,105. Interestingly, OP9-stroma co-culture effects the CD45+CD34+, but not the more differentiated CD45+CD34- cellular compartment, indicating specific effects on hematopoietic progenitor cells50. The fact that HoxB4 does not promote HSC formation from hESC could be the result of technical issues or could reflect intrinsic differences in the biology of human and mouse ESC-derived hematopoietic cells. While differentiation in the murine system proves that derivation of HSC is possible, strategies for human ESC still need to be developed. To facilitate transition to clinical protocols, approaches involving animal products and co-culture systems should be replaced and stable transduction through inserting viral vectors avoided, replaced by strategies involving adenoviral gene transfer, protein transduction106, or small molecules.
Table 3
Table 3
Human blood cell therapies from pluripotent stem cells: Limitations and some potential solutions.
While HSC remain difficult to obtain, there are several reports of successful derivation of specific lineages from ESC by supplementing cultures with cytokines or chemicals or/and using co-culture with specific stroma cell lines. Robust generation of murine erythroid cells and self-renewing immature erythroid progenitors107, megakaryocytes108,109, granulocytes110,111, mast cells112, eosinophils113, T and B lymphocytes81,86,114-116, macrophages117, dendritic cells118-120, NK cells121 has been reported from mESC (reviewed by Olsen and colleagues122). This work in mESC has laid the foundation for interrogating detailed aspects of blood cell biology, such as the role of GATA1 during proerythroblast maturation123, and provided a basis for the development of similar protocols in hESC122, opening up prospects for use in cell replacement therapies. We will review here recent progress that has been made in blood cell production from hESC (Table 2).
Table 2
Table 2
Blood cell types generated by in vitro differentiation of human embryonic stem cells
Large-scale production of red blood cells from the human ESC line H1 was reported 2006 by Olivier et al. High numbers of erythrocytes (5000-fold increase in cell number) were obtained by a 14-day coculture with immortalized human fetal liver cells in the presence of serum-containing medium and subsequent expansion of CD34+ cells in serum-free liquid cultures supplemented with cytokines and defined factors (hydrocortisone, IL3, BMP4, Flt-3L, SCF, EPO, IGF-1, hemin)124. However, the red blood cells obtained were mostly nucleated primitive erythroblasts, which expressed a mixture of embryonic and fetal globins but not beta-globin characteristic for adult cells124. Two years later, the same laboratory reported that prolonging the differentiation cultures on fetal liver cells to 35 days promotes the differentiation of fetal liver-like erythroblasts which are smaller in size, express mostly fetal hemoglobin and are able to enucleate, suggesting that hESC-derived erythropoesis mimicks human development and recapitulates accordingly the globin gene switch125. Functional exploration of hESC-derived red blood cells showed oxygen equilibrium curves comparable to normal red blood cells and, adequate responses to pH and 2,3-phoshodiglycerate changes and suggests further in vitro maturation to adult-type beta-globin expressing cells126,127. One study reports differentiation to functional erythrocytes under serum-free conditions, by using supplementation with cell-permeable recombinant HoxB4 transcription factor126. While these data provide encouraging results and a highly valuable model system to study genetic regulation of erythropoiesis, several issues need to be resolved before manufacture of red blood cells can become a clinical application128: (1) the derivation methods need to be performed serum-free; (2) in a highly scalable fashion (up to now, the largest number reported was 2 billion red blood cells; in comparison, one 220-ml unit of packed red blood cells contains about 2 trillion cells); (3) at reasonable cost enabling industrial production; (4) with improvemed generation of adult-type beta hemoglobin expressing cells. Questions regarding half-life, immunogenicity, contamination with potentially tumorigenic cells need to be addressed before ESC-derived red blood cells can enter large-scale clinical applications and replace conventional red blood cell supplies.
While the issues listed above may hamper applications on a large industrial scale, there may be individual benefit for patients particularly in need of customized blood cells, for example patients requiring lifelong erythrocyte substitution therapies that over time develop alloantibodies that highly restrict the pool of matching blood cell donors. It is plausible that generating patient-specific blood cells from their own pluripotent stem cells will benefit and increase treatment possibilities in these patients.
Granulocytes are not routinely provided by the current donation-based blood transfusion system. PSCs may represent a source for generation of large amounts of neutrophils for the treatment of patients presenting with life-threatening neutropenia. Several studies report efficient formation of myeloid cells from mouse and human ESC using combinatorial differentiation approaches in EB and coculture strategies with stromal cell lines (e.g. S17129 and OP9104)78,104,105,129-132. In a recent report, Yokoyama and colleagues provide evidence that functional neutrophils can be produced from hESC by using EB-differentiation in serum-based medium followed by coculture on OP9 cells for 7 to 14 days in medium supplemented with BMP4, SCF, Flt-3L, IL6, FP6,TPO and G-SCF. During culture on OP9, hESC-derived progenitors matured from mostly myeloblasts and promyelocytes on day 7 to mature, terminally differentiated neutrophils on day 14. The vast majority of OP9-co-cultured progenitors expressed the hematopoietic marker CD45 at all timepoints, while expression of primitive cell markers (CD133, CD34 and CD117) was lost at later timepoints, indicating maturation to terminally differentiated neutrophils. Moreover, functional comparison of hESC- and human peripheral blood derived neutrophils showed similar phagocytosis, chemotaxis, superoxide production, bactericidal activity and oxidative burst capacity, despite observd slight differences in cellular phenotype (hESC derived neutrophils show decreased CD16 expression and aberrant CD64 and CD14 expression)132. Using similar approaches but different combinations of growth factors and cytokines (M-CSF, IL-3), other reports show homogeneous production of functional monocytes and macrophages from hESC, providing tools for investigating myeloid cell development and biology133. Megakaryocyte formation has also been reported from human ESC131,134. Using differentiation on OP9 stromal cells and supplementation with VEGF and TPO, Takayama and colleagues report generation of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors and efficient production of mature megakaryoytes expressing specific surface antigens such as CD41a, CD42a and CD42b131. Some megakaryocytes appeared to be shedding their cytoplasmic membranes, displaying demarcation membrane systems necessary for platelet formation, and platelet-like particles were detected in culture supernatants. Electron microscopy confirmed normal microtubule formation, similar to plasma-derived human platelets, although ESC-derived platelets displayed fewer granules131. Stimulation of hESC-derived platelets with thrombin and ADP induced GPIIb/IIIa activation, and filopodia formed upon adherence to fibrogen-coated dishes, indicating functionality of hESC-derived platelets. On average, after 24 days of culture, approximately 5×106 platelets were generated from an initial 105 human ESC. hESC megakayocytes yield fewer platelets in vitro than their adult counterparts in vivo, possibly due to some microenvironment stimulus lacking in the in vitro differentiation system (e.g. shear flow135). Establishing in vitro protocols for efficient human platelet generation from human PSC promises production of isogenic or histocompatible platelets that can potentially circumvent the need to obtain platelets through blood donation. One advantage in this system is that, as with erythrocytes, mature platelets are enucleated cells that can be irradiated, thereby eliminating safety concerns due to contamination with residual undifferentiated cells.
While erythroid and myeloid progenitor cells can be routinely generated from human PSC, there are few reports on the generation of lymphoid cells in this system. In a recent report, Woll and colleagues demonstrated generation of functional hESC-derived NK-cells capable of inducing efficient anti-tumor responses in vivo. hESC-derived NK-cells are uniformly CD94+CD117low/- and present higher tumor-clearing capacity than NK cells derived from umbilical cord blood136, suggesting that they may serve as a novel cellular source for anti-tumor immunotherapy. Although NK and T cells are devlopmentally closely related, hESC-derived hematopoietic progenitors develop into natural killer (NK) cells136,137, but typically do not form T- or B-cells137, unless specific conditions are provided (e.g. T-cell development following injection into human thymus/fetal liver grafts in severe combined immunodeficient-humanized (SCID-hu) mice138,139 or coculture conditions with OP9 stromal cells expressing high Delta-1 like activity140). Under such conditions, robust T-cell development was observed from hESC138, even though in a less efficient manner than from human fetal liver, bone marrow or umbilical cord hematopoietic progenitors. Another study was able to show under OP9-coculture conditions small percentages of CD19+ cells from hESC, indicating their potential to form B-cells104. Taken together, these studies corroborate the hypothesis that ESC differentiation protocols drive embryonic hematopoiesis and formation of progenitor cells resembling human yolk sac derived CD34+ cells47,141, but identifying specific environmental cues will be essential to induce formation of adult-type cells.
ESCs and the more recently developed iPS cells hold promise for generating histocompatible or isogenic cellular tranplant therapies for a variety of patients. Significant hurdles on the way to clinical application are the biased differentiation into rather immature, embryonic-like progenitor cells that may not functional normally in adults. Furthermore, differentiation protocols for clinical standards need to be improved by removing serum, and other such animal products, as well as co-cultures with animal cells. However, PSCs offer an exciting new model enabling unique studies on human hematopoietic development and disease (reviewed in Lengerke C, Daley GQ. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2009, in press).
Acknowledgments
C.L. is supported by grants from the DFG SFB773, the Deutsche Krebshilfe Max-Eder-Program and the Fortune Program of the University of Tuebingen. G.Q.D. is a recipient of the NIH Director's Pioneer Award of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Clinical Scientist Awards in Translational Research from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and supported by grants from the United States National Institutes of Health and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We thank Shannon McKinney-Freeman and Odelya Hartung for providing the photos of pluripotent stem cells-derived hematopoietic cells.
Footnotes
Conflict of interests statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(12):7634–8. [PubMed]
2. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292(5819):154–6. [PubMed]
3. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–7. [PubMed]
4. Thomas ED, Lochte HL, Jr, Lu WC, Ferrebee JW. Intravenous infusion of bone marrow in patients receiving radiation and chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1957;257(11):491–6. [PubMed]
5. Park IH, Arora N, Huo H, et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2008;134(5):877–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Le Deist F, Carlier F, et al. Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(16):1185–93. [PubMed]
7. Drukker M, Katz G, Urbach A, et al. Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(15):9864–9. [PubMed]
8. Briggs R, King TJ. Transplantation of Living Nuclei From Blastula Cells into Enucleated Frogs' Eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1952;38(5):455–63. [PubMed]
9. Gurdon JB. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1962;10:622–40. [PubMed]
10. Gurdon JB. Adult frogs derived from the nuclei of single somatic cells. Dev Biol. 1962;4:256–73. [PubMed]
11. Kyba M, Perlingeiro RC, Daley GQ. HoxB4 confers definitive lymphoid-myeloid engraftment potential on embryonic stem cell and yolk sac hematopoietic progenitors. Cell. 2002;109(1):29–37. [PubMed]
12. Rideout WM, 3rd, Hochedlinger K, Kyba M, Daley GQ, Jaenisch R. Correction of a genetic defect by nuclear transplantation and combined cell and gene therapy. Cell. 2002;109(1):17–27. [PubMed]
13. Barberi T, Klivenyi P, Calingasan NY, et al. Neural subtype specification of fertilization and nuclear transfer embryonic stem cells and application in parkinsonian mice. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(10):1200–7. [PubMed]
14. Stojkovic M, Stojkovic P, Leary C, et al. Derivation of a human blastocyst after heterologous nuclear transfer to donated oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(2):226–31. [PubMed]
15. Muller R, Lengerke C. Patient-specific pluripotent stem cells: promises and challenges. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5(4):195–203. [PubMed]
16. Kim K, Lerou P, Yabuuchi A, et al. Histocompatible embryonic stem cells by parthenogenesis. Science. 2007;315(5811):482–6. [PubMed]
17. Revazova ES, Turovets NA, Kochetkova OD, et al. Patient-specific stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells. 2007;9(3):432–49. [PubMed]
18. Revazova ES, Turovets NA, Kochetkova OD, et al. HLA homozygous stem cell lines derived from human parthenogenetic blastocysts. Cloning Stem Cells. 2008;10(1):11–24. [PubMed]
19. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76. [PubMed]
20. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. [PubMed]
21. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20. [PubMed]
22. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature. 2008;451(7175):141–6. [PubMed]
23. Aoi T, Yae K, Nakagawa M, et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science. 2008;321(5889):699–702. [PubMed]
24. Kim JB, Zaehres H, Wu G, et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature. 2008;454(7204):646–50. [PubMed]
25. Kim JB, Sebastiano V, Wu G, et al. Oct4-induced pluripotency in adult neural stem cells. Cell. 2009;136(3):411–9. [PubMed]
26. Stadtfeld M, Brennand K, Hochedlinger K. Reprogramming of pancreatic beta cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr Biol. 2008;18(12):890–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27. Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Schorderet P, et al. Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency. Cell. 2008;133(2):250–64. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Loh YH, Agarwal S, Park IH, et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human blood. Blood. 2009 [PubMed]
29. Huangfu D, Osafune K, Maehr R, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 [PubMed]
30. Huangfu D, Maehr R, Guo W, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(7):795–7. [PubMed]
31. Stadtfeld M, Nagaya M, Utikal J, Weir G, Hochedlinger K. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Generated Without Viral Integration. Science. 2008 [PubMed]
32. Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science. 2008;322(5903):949–53. [PubMed]
33. Woltjen K, Michael IP, Mohseni P, et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2009;458(7239):766–70. [PubMed]
34. Kaji K, Norrby K, Paca A, Mileikovsky M, Mohseni P, Woltjen K. Virus-free induction of pluripotency and subsequent excision of reprogramming factors. Nature. 2009;458(7239):771–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Matsui Y, Zsebo K, Hogan BL. Derivation of pluripotential embryonic stem cells from murine primordial germ cells in culture. Cell. 1992;70(5):841–7. [PubMed]
36. Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S, et al. Derivation of pluripotent stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(23):13726–31. [PubMed]
37. Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, et al. Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature. 2006;440(7088):1199–203. [PubMed]
38. Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Inoue K, Lee J, et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell. 2004;119(7):1001–12. [PubMed]
39. Seandel M, James D, Shmelkov SV, et al. Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125+ germline progenitors. Nature. 2007;449(7160):346–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Conrad S, Renninger M, Hennenlotter J, et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis. Nature. 2008 [PubMed]
41. Ohtaka T, Matsui Y, Obinata M. Hematopoietic development of primordial germ cell-derived mouse embryonic germ cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;260(2):475–82. [PubMed]
42. Doetschman TC, Eistetter H, Katz M, Schmidt W, Kemler R. The in vitro development of blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cell lines: formation of visceral yolk sac, blood islands and myocardium. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985;87:27–45. [PubMed]
43. Murry CE, Keller G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell. 2008;132(4):661–80. [PubMed]
44. Lengerke C, Daley GQ. Patterning definitive hematopoietic stem cells from embryonic stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2005;33(9):971–9. [PubMed]
45. Gadue P, Huber TL, Paddison PJ, Keller GM. Wnt and TGF-beta signaling are required for the induction of an in vitro model of primitive streak formation using embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(45):16806–11. [PubMed]
46. Lengerke C, Schmitt S, Bowman TV, et al. BMP and Wnt specify hematopoietic fate by activation of the Cdx-Hox pathway. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(1):72–82. [PubMed]
47. Adamo L, Naveiras O, Wenzel PL, et al. Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature. 2009;459(7250):1131–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Manz MG. Human-hemato-lymphoid-system mice: opportunities and challenges. Immunity. 2007;26(5):537–41. [PubMed]
49. Hanna J, Wernig M, Markoulaki S, et al. Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science. 2007;318(5858):1920–3. [PubMed]
50. Ji J, Vijayaragavan K, Bosse M, Menendez P, Weisel K, Bhatia M. OP9 stroma augments survival of hematopoietic precursors and progenitors during hematopoietic differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(10):2485–95. [PubMed]
51. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(1):55–70. [PubMed]
52. Zhang J, Wilson GF, Soerens AG, et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ Res. 2009;104(4):e30–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
53. Taura D, Noguchi M, Sone M, et al. Adipogenic differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells: comparison with that of human embryonic stem cells. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(6):1029–33. [PubMed]
54. Choi KD, Yu J, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Hematopoietic and Endothelial Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(3):559–567. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
55. Huber TL, Kouskoff V, Fehling HJ, Palis J, Keller G. Haemangioblast commitment is initiated in the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Nature. 2004;432(7017):625–30. [PubMed]
56. Kennedy M, D'Souza SL, Lynch-Kattman M, Schwantz S, Keller G. Development of the hemangioblast defines the onset of hematopoiesis in human ES cell differentiation cultures. Blood. 2007;109(7):2679–87. [PubMed]
57. Kennedy M, Firpo M, Choi K, et al. A common precursor for primitive erythropoiesis and definitive haematopoiesis. Nature. 1997;386(6624):488–93. [PubMed]
58. Choi K, Kennedy M, Kazarov A, Papadimitriou JC, Keller G. A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 1998;125(4):725–32. [PubMed]
59. Galloway JL, Zon LI. Ontogeny of hematopoiesis: examining the emergence of hematopoietic cells in the vertebrate embryo. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;53:139–58. [PubMed]
60. Dzierzak E, Speck NA. Of lineage and legacy: the development of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(2):129–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
61. Lancrin C, Sroczynska P, Stephenson C, Allen T, Kouskoff V, Lacaud G. The haemangioblast generates haematopoietic cells through a haemogenic endothelium stage. Nature. 2009;457(7231):892–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
62. Eilken HM, Nishikawa S, Schroeder T. Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium. Nature. 2009;457(7231):896–900. [PubMed]
63. Moore MA, Owen JJ. Chromosome marker studies on the development of the haemopoietic system in the chick embryo. Nature. 1965;208(5014):956. passim. [PubMed]
64. Moore MA, Owen JJ. Chromosome marker studies in the irradiated chick embryo. Nature. 1967;215(5105):1081–2. [PubMed]
65. Dieterlen-Lievre F. On the origin of haemopoietic stem cells in the avian embryo: an experimental approach. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1975;33(3):607–19. [PubMed]
66. Lassila O, Eskola J, Toivanen P, Martin C, Dieterlen-Lievre F. The origin of lymphoid stem cells studied in chick yold sac-embryo chimaeras. Nature. 1978;272(5651):353–4. [PubMed]
67. Lassila O, Martin C, Toivanen P, Dieterlen-Lievre F. Erythropoiesis and lymphopoiesis in the chick yolk-sac-embryo chimeras: contribution of yolk sac and intraembryonic stem cells. Blood. 1982;59(2):377–81. [PubMed]
68. Dieterlen-Lievre F, Martin C. Diffuse intraembryonic hemopoiesis in normal and chimeric avian development. Dev Biol. 1981;88(1):180–91. [PubMed]
69. Medvinsky AL, Samoylina NL, Muller AM, Dzierzak EA. An early pre-liver intraembryonic source of CFU-S in the developing mouse. Nature. 1993;364(6432):64–7. [PubMed]
70. Muller AM, Medvinsky A, Strouboulis J, Grosveld F, Dzierzak E. Development of hematopoietic stem cell activity in the mouse embryo. Immunity. 1994;1(4):291–301. [PubMed]
71. Yoder MC, Hiatt K, Mukherjee P. In vivo repopulating hematopoietic stem cells are present in the murine yolk sac at day 9. 0 postcoitus Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(13):6776–80. [PubMed]
72. Yoder MC, Hiatt K. Engraftment of embryonic hematopoietic cells in conditioned newborn recipients. Blood. 1997;89(6):2176–83. [PubMed]
73. North TE, Goessling W, Walkley CR, et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis. Nature. 2007;447(7147):1007–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
74. Davidson AJ, Ernst P, Wang Y, et al. cdx4 mutants fail to specify blood progenitors and can be rescued by multiple hox genes. Nature. 2003;425(6955):300–6. [PubMed]
75. Zambidis ET, Oberlin E, Tavian M, Peault B. Blood-forming endothelium in human ontogeny: lessons from in utero development and embryonic stem cell culture. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2006;16(3):95–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
76. Tian X, Woll PS, Morris JK, Linehan JL, Kaufman DS. Hematopoietic engraftment of human embryonic stem cell-derived cells is regulated by recipient innate immunity. Stem Cells. 2006;24(5):1370–80. [PubMed]
77. Zambidis ET, Park TS, Yu W, et al. Expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (CD143) identifies and regulates primitive hemangioblasts derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Blood. 2008;112(9):3601–14. [PubMed]
78. Chadwick K, Wang L, Li L, et al. Cytokines and BMP-4 promote hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2003;102(3):906–15. [PubMed]
79. Ledran MH, Krassowska A, Armstrong L, et al. Efficient hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on stromal cells derived from hematopoietic niches. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(1):85–98. [PubMed]
80. Cho SK, Webber TD, Carlyle JR, Nakano T, Lewis SM, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Functional characterization of B lymphocytes generated in vitro from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(17):9797–802. [PubMed]
81. Schmitt TM, de Pooter RF, Gronski MA, Cho SK, Ohashi PS, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Induction of T cell development and establishment of T cell competence from embryonic stem cells differentiated in vitro. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(4):410–7. [PubMed]
82. Burt RK, Verda L, Kim DA, Oyama Y, Luo K, Link C. Embryonic stem cells as an alternate marrow donor source: engraftment without graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. 2004;199(7):895–904. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
83. Kushida T, Inaba M, Hisha H, et al. Intra-bone marrow injection of allogeneic bone marrow cells: a powerful new strategy for treatment of intractable autoimmune diseases in MRL/lpr mice. Blood. 2001;97(10):3292–9. [PubMed]
84. Ikehara S. A novel strategy for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: perfusion method plus intra-bone marrow injection of stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2003;31(12):1142–6. [PubMed]
85. Palacios R, Golunski E, Samaridis J. In vitro generation of hematopoietic stem cells from an embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(16):7530–4. [PubMed]
86. Nakano T, Kodama H, Honjo T. In vitro development of primitive and definitive erythrocytes from different precursors. Science. 1996;272(5262):722–4. [PubMed]
87. Wang Y, Yates F, Naveiras O, Ernst P, Daley GQ. Embryonic stem cell-derived hematopoietic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(52):19081–6. [PubMed]
88. Pilat S, Carotta S, Schiedlmeier B, et al. HOXB4 enforces equivalent fates of ES-cell-derived and adult hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(34):12101–6. [PubMed]
89. Eckardt S, Leu NA, Bradley HL, Kato H, Bunting KD, McLaughlin KJ. Hematopoietic reconstitution with androgenetic and gynogenetic stem cells. Genes Dev. 2007;21(4):409–19. [PubMed]
90. Abramovich C, Humphries RK. Hox regulation of normal and leukemic hematopoietic stem cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2005;12(3):210–6. [PubMed]
91. Antonchuk J, Sauvageau G, Humphries RK. HOXB4-induced expansion of adult hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo. Cell. 2002;109(1):39–45. [PubMed]
92. Sauvageau G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Eaves CJ, et al. Overexpression of HOXB4 in hematopoietic cells causes the selective expansion of more primitive populations in vitro and in vivo. Genes Dev. 1995;9(14):1753–65. [PubMed]
93. Buske C, Feuring-Buske M, Abramovich C, et al. Deregulated expression of HOXB4 enhances the primitive growth activity of human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 2002;100(3):862–8. [PubMed]
94. Davidson AJ, Zon LI. The caudal-related homeobox genes cdx1a and cdx4 act redundantly to regulate hox gene expression and the formation of putative hematopoietic stem cells during zebrafish embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 2006;292(2):506–18. [PubMed]
95. Wang Y, Yabuuchi A, McKinney-Freeman S, et al. Cdx gene deficiency compromises embryonic hematopoiesis in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(22):7756–61. [PubMed]
96. McKinney-Freeman SL, Lengerke C, Jang IH, et al. Modulation of murine embryonic stem cell-derived CD41+c-kit+ hematopoietic progenitors by ectopic expression of Cdx genes. Blood. 2008;111(10):4944–53. [PubMed]
97. Lengerke C, McKinney-Freeman S, Naveiras O, et al. The cdx-hox pathway in hematopoietic stem cell formation from embryonic stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1106:197–208. [PubMed]
98. Riedt T, Ebinger M, Salih HR, et al. Aberrant expression of the homeobox gene CDX2 in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2009;113(17):4049–51. [PubMed]
99. Thoene S, Rawat VP, Heilmeier B, et al. The homeobox gene CDX2 is aberrantly expressed and associated with an inferior prognosis in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23(4):649–55. [PubMed]
100. Rawat VP, Thoene S, Naidu VM, et al. Overexpression of CDX2 perturbs HOX gene expression in murine progenitors depending on its N-terminal domain and is closely correlated with deregulated HOX gene expression in human acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2008;111(1):309–19. [PubMed]
101. Scholl C, Bansal D, Dohner K, et al. The homeobox gene CDX2 is aberrantly expressed in most cases of acute myeloid leukemia and promotes leukemogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(4):1037–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
102. Mikkola HK, Fujiwara Y, Schlaeger TM, Traver D, Orkin SH. Expression of CD41 marks the initiation of definitive hematopoiesis in the mouse embryo. Blood. 2003;101(2):508–16. [PubMed]
103. McKinney-Freeman SL, Naveiras O, Yates F, et al. Surface antigen phenotypes of hematopoietic stem cells from embryos and murine embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2009 [PubMed]
104. Vodyanik MA, Bork JA, Thomson JA, Slukvin II. Human embryonic stem cell-derived CD34+ cells: efficient production in the coculture with OP9 stromal cells and analysis of lymphohematopoietic potential. Blood. 2005;105(2):617–26. [PubMed]
105. Wang L, Menendez P, Shojaei F, et al. Generation of hematopoietic repopulating cells from human embryonic stem cells independent of ectopic HOXB4 expression. J Exp Med. 2005;201(10):1603–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
106. Krosl J, Austin P, Beslu N, Kroon E, Humphries RK, Sauvageau G. In vitro expansion of hematopoietic stem cells by recombinant TAT-HOXB4 protein. Nat Med. 2003;9(11):1428–32. [PubMed]
107. Carotta S, Pilat S, Mairhofer A, et al. Directed differentiation and mass cultivation of pure erythroid progenitors from mouse embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2004;104(6):1873–80. [PubMed]
108. Fujimoto TT, Kohata S, Suzuki H, Miyazaki H, Fujimura K. Production of functional platelets by differentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells in vitro. Blood. 2003;102(12):4044–51. [PubMed]
109. Eto K, Murphy R, Kerrigan SW, et al. Megakaryocytes derived from embryonic stem cells implicate CalDAG-GEFI in integrin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(20):12819–24. [PubMed]
110. Lieber JG, Keller GM, Worthen GS. The in vitro differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into neutrophils. Methods Enzymol. 2003;365:129–42. [PubMed]
111. Lieber JG, Webb S, Suratt BT, et al. The in vitro production and characterization of neutrophils from embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2004;103(3):852–9. [PubMed]
112. Tsai M, Tam SY, Wedemeyer J, Galli SJ. Mast cells derived from embryonic stem cells: a model system for studying the effects of genetic manipulations on mast cell development, phenotype, and function in vitro and in vivo. Int J Hematol. 2002;75(4):345–9. [PubMed]
113. Hamaguchi-Tsuru E, Nobumoto A, Hirose N, et al. Development and functional analysis of eosinophils from murine embryonic stem cells. Br J Haematol. 2004;124(6):819–27. [PubMed]
114. Cho SK, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Development of lymphoid lineages from embryonic stem cells in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 2003;365:158–69. [PubMed]
115. de Pooter RF, Cho SK, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. In vitro generation of lymphocytes from embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;290:135–47. [PubMed]
116. de Pooter RF, Cho SK, Carlyle JR, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. In vitro generation of T lymphocytes from embryonic stem cell-derived prehematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2003;102(5):1649–53. [PubMed]
117. Moore KJ, Fabunmi RP, Andersson LP, Freeman MW. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cell macrophages: a model system for studying atherosclerosis-associated macrophage functions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(10):1647–54. [PubMed]
118. Senju S, Hirata S, Matsuyoshi H, et al. Generation and genetic modification of dendritic cells derived from mouse embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2003;101(9):3501–8. [PubMed]
119. Fairchild PJ, Brook FA, Gardner RL, et al. Directed differentiation of dendritic cells from mouse embryonic stem cells. Curr Biol. 2000;10(23):1515–8. [PubMed]
120. Fairchild PJ, Nolan KF, Waldmann H. Probing dendritic cell function by guiding the differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 2003;365:169–86. [PubMed]
121. Lian RH, Maeda M, Lohwasser S, et al. Orderly and nonstochastic acquisition of CD94/NKG2 receptors by developing NK cells derived from embryonic stem cells in vitro. J Immunol. 2002;168(10):4980–7. [PubMed]
122. Olsen AL, Stachura DL, Weiss MJ. Designer blood: creating hematopoietic lineages from embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2006;107(4):1265–75. [PubMed]
123. Weiss MJ, Keller G, Orkin SH. Novel insights into erythroid development revealed through in vitro differentiation of GATA-1 embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 1994;8(10):1184–97. [PubMed]
124. Olivier EN, Qiu C, Velho M, Hirsch RE, Bouhassira EE. Large-scale production of embryonic red blood cells from human embryonic stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2006;34(12):1635–42. [PubMed]
125. Qiu C, Olivier EN, Velho M, Bouhassira EE. Globin switches in yolk sac-like primitive and fetal-like definitive red blood cells produced from human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2008;111(4):2400–8. [PubMed]
126. Lu SJ, Feng Q, Park JS, et al. Biologic properties and enucleation of red blood cells from human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2008;112(12):4475–84. [PubMed]
127. Ma F, Ebihara Y, Umeda K, et al. Generation of functional erythrocytes from human embryonic stem cell-derived definitive hematopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(35):13087–92. [PubMed]
128. Bouhassira EE. Toward the manufacture of red blood cells? Blood. 2008;112(12):4362–3. [PubMed]
129. Kaufman DS, Hanson ET, Lewis RL, Auerbach R, Thomson JA. Hematopoietic colony-forming cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(19):10716–21. [PubMed]
130. Cerdan C, Rouleau A, Bhatia M. VEGF-A165 augments erythropoietic development from human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2004;103(7):2504–12. [PubMed]
131. Takayama N, Nishikii H, Usui J, et al. Generation of functional platelets from human embryonic stem cells in vitro via ES-sacs, VEGF-promoted structures that concentrate hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2008;111(11):5298–306. [PubMed]
132. Yokoyama Y, Suzuki T, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, et al. Derivation of functional mature neutrophils from human embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2009 [PubMed]
133. Karlsson KR, Cowley S, Martinez FO, Shaw M, Minger SL, James W. Homogeneous monocytes and macrophages from human embryonic stem cells following coculture-free differentiation in M-CSF and IL-3. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(9):1167–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
134. Gaur M, Kamata T, Wang S, Moran B, Shattil SJ, Leavitt AD. Megakaryocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells: a genetically tractable system to study megakaryocytopoiesis and integrin function. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):436–42. [PubMed]
135. Junt T, Schulze H, Chen Z, et al. Dynamic visualization of thrombopoiesis within bone marrow. Science. 2007;317(5845):1767–70. [PubMed]
136. Woll PS, Grzywacz B, Tian X, et al. Human embryonic stem cells differentiate into a homogeneous population of natural killer cells with potent in vivo anti-tumor activity. Blood. 2009 [PubMed]
137. Martin CH, Woll PS, Ni Z, Zuniga-Pflucker JC, Kaufman DS. Differences in lymphocyte developmental potential between human embryonic stem cell and umbilical cord blood-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 2008;112(7):2730–7. [PubMed]
138. Galic Z, Kitchen SG, Kacena A, et al. T lineage differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(31):11742–7. [PubMed]
139. Galic Z, Kitchen SG, Subramanian A, et al. Generation of T lineage cells from human embryonic stem cells in a feeder free system. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):100–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
140. Timmermans F, Velghe I, Vanwalleghem L, et al. Generation of T cells from human embryonic stem cell-derived hematopoietic zones. J Immunol. 2009;182(11):6879–88. [PubMed]
141. Tavian M, Robin C, Coulombel L, Peault B. The human embryo, but not its yolk sac, generates lympho-myeloid stem cells: mapping multipotent hematopoietic cell fate in intraembryonic mesoderm. Immunity. 2001;15(3):487–95. [PubMed]