Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ijpsychHomeCurrent issueInstructionsSubmit article
Indian J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr-Jun; 48(2): 114–117.
PMCID: PMC2913560

Psychological assessment of alcoholism in males



Little work has been done in India on the personality factors of alcoholics. These personality factors have a significant effect on treatment outcome.


To study the personality characteristics, stressful life events and diagnostic utility of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) and CAGE (Cutting down, Annoyance by criticism, Guilty feeling, and Eye-opener) Questionnaire in service personnel with alcohol dependence.


Psychological assessment of 100 consecutive male inpatients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence, and an equal number of controls matched for age, sex, occupation and regional background was carried out utilizing the MAST, CAGE Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Multiphasic Personality Questionnaire, Maudsley Personality Inventory, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Self-esteem Inventory and Presumptive Stressful Life Events scale.


The MAST and CAGE were of limited value in the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Alcoholics obtained significantly higher scores on state and trait anxiety, depression, mania scale, paranoia scale, schizophrenia scale, psychopathic deviance, neuroticism, extroversion, and the Presumptive Stressful Life Events scale. Alcohol-dependent individuals had significantly lower self-esteem compared with control subjects, and significantly more alcoholics were identified as alexithymic.


Alcohol-dependent individuals show significantly high neuroticism, extroversion, anxiety, depression, psychopathic deviation, stressful life events and significantly low self-esteem as compared with normal control subjects. Significantly more alcoholics were found to be alexithymic compared with normal controls.

Keywords: Alcohol dependence, alexithymia, self-esteem, anxiety, depression, life events


Concerted attempts have been made to relate personality factors to alcohol dependence. Potential alcoholics tend to be emotionally immature, expect a great deal of the world, require an inordinate amount of praise and appreciation, react to failure with marked feelings of hurt and inferiority, have a low frustration tolerance, and feel inadequate and unsure of their abilities to fulfil expected male or female roles.1 Certainly, many people with similar personality characteristics do not become alcoholics, and others with dissimilar ones do. One characteristic that appears common to the backgrounds of most problem drinkers is personal maladjustment, yet most maladjusted people do not become alcoholics. Although the significance of alcoholic personality factors remains unclear, researchers have shown that the personality of alcoholics significantly influences treatment outcome.2 Hence, an understanding of the personality characteristics associated with alcohol dependence may be useful for treatment.

Early diagnosis is another factor that influences treatment. Often, short questionnaires such as the MAST (Michigan Alcoholism Sreening Test) and CAGE (Cutting down, Annoyance by criticism, Guilty feeling, and Eye-opener) are used to screen populations for alcohol dependence. Researchers have long been interested in how individuals and environments affect each other, primarily to be able to explain age-related behaviour and individual differences. One focus has been to study life events. Through the life events scale we can get a simple index of life stress.

Comparatively little work has been done in this field in India and no work has been carried out among the security forces, where alcohol dependence is a major problem.3 This prompted us to focus on a few psychological tests in an effort to reveal the personality characteristics and stressful life events in alcohol-dependent individuals, and to study the diagnostic utility of the MAST and CAGE among service personnel.


One hundred consecutive male inpatients admitted to the psychiatric centres of two Base Hospitals and meeting the DSM-IV criteria4 for alcohol dependence were included in the study with their informed consent. An equal number of subjects matched for age, sex and regional background without any physical or psychiatric illness formed the control group. Exclusion and inclusion criteria have been given elsewhere.5

The mean age (± SD) of the patients and control subjects was 38.05 (± 7.36) years and 38.57 (± 7.32) years, respectively (range 25–54 years for both groups). There were no significant differences between the two groups on sociodemographic variables such as age, service, rank, marital status, education, religion and domicile. All the subjects were male. All the subjects were administered the following psychological tests after 7–9 days of hospitalization:

  1. MAST6
  2. CAGE Questionnaire6
    Both these screening instruments were used to compare their diagnostic utility in service personnel.
  3. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)6—measures anxiety: At present (state) and habitual (trait)
  4. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)6
  5. Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS)6
  6. Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI)7—to assess neuroticism and extroversion
  7. Multiphasic Personality Questionnaire (MPQ)8,9—to assess the presence of paranoid, hysteria, schizophrenic, anxiety, mania, depression and psychopathic features
  8. Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI)10
  9. Presumptive Stressful Life Events (PSLE) scale11

The control subjects also underwent all the tests given to the patients. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann–Whitney U test and Chi-square test with Yates correction as appropriate.


On the MAST, 69 patients and 6 control subjects scored in the alcoholic range, the difference being highly statistically significant (χ2=84.7; df=1; p<0.01). On the CAGE, 66 patients and 5 control subjects scored in the alcoholic range. The difference was highly statistically significant (χ2=78.61; df=1; p<0.01). Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the MAST and CAGE for alcohol dependence are given in Table 1.

Table 1
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values for alcohol dependence of the MAST and the CAGE questionnaire

The results of the other psychological tests are given in Table 2. Alcohol-dependent individuals obtained significantly higher scores on neuroticism and extroversion on the MPI.

Table 2
Psychological test results of alcohol-dependent patients (n=100) and matched control subjects (n=100)

On the MPQ, alcohol-dependent patients scored significantly higher on paranoia, mania, depression, schizophrenia, psychopathic deviance (Pd) and the anxiety scale. Compared to control subjects, alcohol-dependent patients had significantly higher scores on state and trait anxiety, depression and stressful life events. On the Self-Esteem Inventory, alcohol-dependent patients scored significantly higher, indicating markedly lower self-esteem among them compared with normal subjects. There was no statistically significant difference on the TAS scores between alcohol-dependent and control subjects. However, a TAS score greater than 74 is recommended as the cut-off point for identifying alexithymic people. Based on this, 26 alcoholics and 12 normal subjects were identified as alexithymic, the difference being highly statistically significant (χ2=7.11; df=1; p<0.01).


In the present study, with the DSM-IV diagnosis as the standard, the MAST and CAGE Questionnaire showed a high specificity (about 94%) and high positive predictive value (about 92%), but their sensitivity for the DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence was rather low (69% and 66%, respectively). Thus, the MAST and CAGE are of limited utility as screening instruments; in future studies in security forces the CAGE may be preferred because of its brevity. In support of this, it has been reported that the positive predictive value of the MAST in unselected clinical samples as well as in epidemiological surveys is rather low.12 It is noteworthy that the MAST and CAGE only assess the lifetime risk of severe alcohol problems and so may have a lower sensitivity for current alcohol dependence.

The finding of significantly higher scores on extroversion indicate that alcohol-dependent subjects are characterized by traits such as being more assertive, dominant, sociable, carefree and venturesome as compared to non-dependent people. This finding is in agreement with that of Mathew and Baby13 but not of King et al.14 Alcohol-dependent patients also obtained significantly higher scores on the neuroticism dimension. This indicates that they are significantly more emotional, frequently anxious and/or depressed, moody and tense. Similar results were reported in earlier studies.12,15

Among the personality traits studied in alcohol-dependent individuals, antisocial personality has been looked into most often.1 In the present study, alcohol-dependent subjects obtained significantly higher scores on the Pd scale of the MPQ, which is in agreement with the findings of Neeliyara et al.16 A longitudinal study of men older than 40 years also revealed that antisocial behaviour in adolescence is the sole individual predictor of alcoholism.17 However, it must be pointed out here that the high Pd scores in alcohol-dependent patients indicate a transitory state, which may be amenable to change with treatment. Our finding that alcohol-dependent patients showed disturbances in the depression, mania, schizophrenia, psychopathic deviance and anxiety scales is consistent with previous research that the disturbance in the MPQ in people with substance abuse is broad-based, variable and non-specific.18

Alcohol-dependent individuals also obtained significantly higher trait and state anxiety scores (Table 2). These findings support those of a few earlier studies.14,16 This aspect may be aetiologically significant in alcohol dependence. Anxiety has been suggested to be an important factor in the initial development and subsequent maintenance of alcohol abuse and dependence. Some patients use alcohol as a medication for the treatment of anxiety. Unfortunately, an accurate diagnosis of anxiety disorders is difficult to make, since current anxiety symptoms may be secondary to alcohol withdrawal rather than reflecting underlying anxiety disorders.19 The findings of the present study also reveal that alcohol-dependent individuals are different from those with anxiety neurosis, since they have a high state anxiety unlike those with anxiety neurosis, who have a high trait anxiety. This indicates that anxiety in alcohol-dependent individuals is transitory, varies in intensity and fluctuates over time, and can be easily modified. One of the sources of anxiety is a low level of self-esteem, fear of disapproval from significant people, loss of position, prestige, stature or self-esteem.16 Thus, these findings also support our finding that alcoholics have low self-esteem, which underlies the need for reducing anxiety using suitable therapeutic interventions.

The finding of significantly higher depression scores in alcohol-dependent persons (Table 2) is in agreement with earlier work.14,15 While some patients may use alcohol as ‘self-medication’ for their depression, alcohol itself may produce clinically significant depression. Clinicians obviously need to carefully assess alcohol-dependent individuals for depression, which must also be treated.

Patients with alcohol dependence experience significantly more stressful life events in the past year and over their lifetime (Table 2). These findings are in line with previous reports.13,14,20 Men who are lifelong abstainers experience fewer life events than problem drinkers; in turn, problem drinkers experience less stress than alcoholics.14 Alcoholics may offset stress-induced emotional distress by resorting to drink which, in turn, might lead to a further increase in negative life events.

A person's self-structure is an important aspect of his personality. A healthy personality is manifested when an individual has a positive attitude towards him/herself. Studies in this area have shown that psychiatric patients have unhealthy self-structures by way of poor self-concept. In this view, alcohol-dependent individuals suffer from lowered feelings of self-esteem, pervasive feelings of inferiority and powerlessness, coupled with unusually strong inhibitions against the expression of hostile or aggressive impulses. In the present study, alcohol-dependent individuals had significantly lower self-esteem as compared with normal subjects. This finding is in agreement with that of Neeliyara et al.16 This indicates that alcohol-dependent individuals have less positive self-feelings and more feelings of alienation and isolation.

Though alcohol-dependent patients and normal subjects in the present study did not differ in the mean alexithymia scores (Table 2), significantly higher numbers of alcohol-dependent subjects were identified to have alexithymia. This finding is congruent with earlier work.15,21 It has been reported that in recently sober alcoholics the alexithymic cognitive dimension—an inability to identify feelings and to distinguish them from bodily sensations—is related to depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. The addictive behaviour of these people signifies desperate attempts at self-treatment.15,21

From the present study, it can be concluded that alcohol-dependent individuals show significantly high neuroticism, extroversion, anxiety, depression, psychopathic deviation and significantly low self-esteem as compared to normal control subjects. Significantly more alcoholics were found to be alexithymic. Future studies should assess whether identification of these personality characteristics and institution of suitable psychosocial interventions can improve the outcome of therapy for the alcohol-dependence syndrome in security personnel.


1. Carson RC, Butcher JN, Mineka S. Abnormal psychology and modern life. 11th ed. New York: Longman; 2000. pp. 109–32.
2. Thurstin AH, Alfano AM. The association of alcoholic subtype with treatment outcome. Int J Addict. 1988;23:321–30. [PubMed]
3. Raju MSVK, Chaudhury S, Sudarsanan S, et al. Trends and issues in relation to alcohol dependence in Armed Forces. Med J Armed Forces India. 2002;58:143–8.
4. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: APA; 1994. American Psychiatric Association (APA)
5. Chaudhury S, Das SK, Mishra BS, et al. Physiological evaluation of alcohol dependence. Indian J Psychiatry. 2002;44:144–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Bech P, Malt UF, Dencker SJ, et al. Scales for assessment of diagnosis and severity of mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993;87:37–54. (Suppl. 372) [PubMed]
7. Jalota S, Kapoor SD. Hindi version of HJ Eysenck's MPI. New Delhi: The Psycho-centre; 1972.
8. Laxminarayan CS, Sathyavathy K, Murthy HN. Towards the development of the psychopathic deviate scale. Transactions of All India Institute of Mental Health, Bangalore. 1669:81–6.
9. Murthy HN. Development of paranoid, depressive, manic and anxiety scale. Transactions of All India Institute of Mental Health, Bangalore. 1965:50–9.
10. Waltins D. The development and evaluation of self-esteem measuring instrument. J Pers Assess. 1978;42:171–82. [PubMed]
11. Singh G, Kaur D, Kaur H. Presumptive stressful life events scale. Agra: National Psychological Corporation; 1983.
12. Nielsen SD, Storgaard H, Moesgaard F. Prevalence of alcohol problems among adult somatic inpatients of a Copenhagen hospital. Alcohol Alcohol. 1994;29:583–90. [PubMed]
13. Mathew P, Baby J. Personality and life change events of alcoholics and nonalcoholics: A comparative study. Psychol Stud (Mysore) 1998;43:65–7.
14. King AC, Bernardy NC, Hauner K. Stressful life events, personality, and mood disturbance: Gender differences in alcoholics and problem drinkers. Addict Behav. 2003;28:171–87. [PubMed]
15. Cardoso JMN, Barbosa A, Ismail F, et al. Neter alcoholic typology. Alcohol Alcohol. 2006;41:133–9. [PubMed]
16. Neeliyara T, Nagalakshmi SV, Ray R. Personality characteristics of individuals with alcohol dependence. In: Ray R, Pickens RW, editors. Proceedings of the Indo-US symposium on alcohol and drug abuse. Bangalore: NIMHANS; 1989. pp. 197–205.
17. Vaillant GE, Clark W, Cyrus C. Prospective study of alcoho-lism treatment: Eight year follow-up. Am J Med. 1985;75:455–63. [PubMed]
18. Mattoo SK, Varma VK, Singh RA, et al. Alienation, Sensation Seeking and Multiphasic Personality Questionnaire profile in men being treated for alcohol and/or opioid dependence. Indian J Psychiatry. 2001;43:317–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Thevos A, Johnston AL, Lathain PK, et al. Symptoms of anxiety in inpatient alcoholics with and without DSM-III R anxiety diagnosis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991;15:102–5. [PubMed]
20. Taylor J. Substance use disorders and cluster B personality disorders: Physiological, cognitive and environmental correlates in a college sample. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31:515–35. [PubMed]
21. Sakuraba S, Kubo M, Komoda T, et al. Suicidal ideation and alexithymia in patients with alcoholism: A pilot study. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40:823–30. [PubMed]

Articles from Indian Journal of Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Medknow Publications