The gene
Srebpf1 encodes the proteins SREBP1a and SREBP1c which have highly overlapping specificities for target sequences, but appear to differ in their transactivation capacities [
21]. While both SREBP1a and SREBP1c are expressed in adipose tissue
in vivo, SREBP1c is the more highly expressed in this tissue in both mice and humans [
22]. However, initial studies suggested that only the SREBP1a isoform was expressed in differentiating 3T3-L1 cells [
22], although other investigators have reported substantial expression of SREBP1c [
12]. We therefore examined the expression of each isoform in differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. As shown in ,
SREBP1c mRNA expression was almost undetectable in preadipocytes, but dramatically induced during adipogenesis and abundant in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In contrast
SREBP1a was clearly detectable in preadipocytes and, while also induced further during differentiation, did not show the dramatic increases observed for
SREBP1c (). These assays do not permit quantitative comparison of
SREBP1a versus
SREBP1c levels, however, they do show that
SREBP1c is highly induced and abundant during adpogenesis, making 3T3-L1 cells suitable to study the transcriptional regulation of
SREBP1c. When searching for candidate pathways that might regulate SREBP1c we noted that the time course of its induction was similar to that observed for known C/EBP
β targets such as C/EBP
α, 11
βHSD1 (11-
β-hydroxysteroid dehyrogenase type 1) and DGAT2 [
9,
23,
24]. In addition we found that SREBP1c and the C/EBP
β target DGAT2 were induced with similar time courses in both murine ES cells undergoing adipogenic differentiation (
Supplementary Figures S1A and S1B at
http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/425/bj4250215add.htm) and differentiating isolated human preadipocytes (
Supplementary Figures S1C and S1D).
To further investigate whether C/EBP
β might regulate
SREBP1c expression we examined its expression in cells over-expressing the inhibitory LIP isoform of C/EBP
β and cells constitutively expressing the C/EBP
β inhibitor ETO [
9]. As shown in respectively, LIP expression inhibited not only
C/EBPα expression but also the induction of
SREBP1c mRNA. Likewise, inhibition of C/EBP activity with ETO impaired the induction of
C/EBPα () and
SREBP1c expression () to a similar degree. Taken together these results support a role for C/EBP
β in the regulation of SREBP1c during adipogenesis.
LIP is known to inhibit multiple C/EBP isoforms, whereas the specificity of ETO is not fully defined. Therefore we next used specific siRNA oligonucleotides to knockdown individual C/EBP isoforms to examine their contribution to the regulation of SREBP1c. Cells were transfected with siRNAs targeting C/EBPβ or C/EBPδ or a mixture of both prior to induction of differentiation. As shown in , the increase in C/EBPβ expression following the induction of differentiation was inhibited by transfection with C/EBPβ siRNA, but not C/EBPδ siRNA. A similar degree of inhibition was observed when C/EBPβ siRNA was co-transfected with C/EBPδ siRNA. Likewise C/EBPδ siRNA significantly impaired the induction of C/EBPδ expression, but did not prevent C/EBPβ induction (). C/EBPδ siRNA was similarly effective when co-transfected with C/EBPβ siRNA, substantially inhibiting C/EBPδ expression.
Lysates from identically transfected cells differentiated for various times were analysed by Western blotting to determine either C/EBP
β or C/EBP
δ protein expression (). Knockdown of C/EBP
β or C/EBP
δ with siRNA resulted in an almost complete loss of the induction of C/EBP
β (top panel) or C/EBP
δ (bottom panel) protein respectively, consistent with the effects observed at the RNA level. Again, co-transfection of cells with siRNA targeting both
C/EBPβ and
C/EBPδ led to almost complete inhibition of the expression of both of these proteins. As we have previously reported [
9], knockdown of C/EBP
β led to an almost complete inhibition of lipid accumulation in differentiating 3T3-L1 cells as assessed by Oil Red O staining (). Knockdown of C/EBP
δ expression had a less marked effect on lipid accumulation in these cells. The knockdown of both C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ together led to the most dramatic inhibition of lipid accumulation.
We next examined the effect of C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ knockdown on a well-characterized C/EBP target gene,
C/EBPα. As predicted by previous cellular and
in vivo studies,
C/EBPα expression was most strongly affected by inhibition of C/EBP
β, although C/EBP
δ knockdown also substantially inhibited its induction during adipogenesis (). Knockdown of both C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ in the same cells further impaired the induction of
C/EBPα mRNA. Having shown that C/EBP
β regulates DGAT2 induction during adipogenesis in a previous study [
9], we also examined whether C/EBP
δ could regulate DGAT2 expression. Indeed, knockdown of C/EBP
δ significantly inhibited
DGAT2, which was reduced to 45 % and 50 % of the levels seen in control cells at day 3 and day 5 of differentiation respectively (). In addition, the combined knockdown of both C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ caused an even greater reduction in
DGAT2 expression. These results suggest that, in addition to C/EBP
β, C/EBP
δ makes an important contribution to the regulation of DGAT2 expression during early adipogenesis.
Analysis of SREBP1c expression in these samples revealed that the regulation of SREBP1c was very similar to that of C/EBPα and DGAT2. Knockdown of C/EBPβ alone led to inhibition of SREBP1c expression to approx. 30 % and 50 % of the levels seen in control cells at day 3 and day 5 respectively, following differentiation of these cells (). Inhibition of C/EBPδ using siRNA gave very similar results, suggesting that both C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ are important for the induction of SREBP1c during adipogenesis. Moreover, siRNA knockdown of both C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ in the same cells reduced expression of SREBP1c at day 3 and day 5 further to approx. 20 % and 35 %of those in control cells respectively.
To determine the specificity of these effects, the effect of C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ inhibition on SREBP1a expression was also determined. As shown in , the inhibition of C/EBPβ, C/EBPδ or combined inhibition of both factors by siRNA did not significantly affect SREBP1a expression at any of the time points tested. These results show that, as SREBP1a is normally induced in these cells, C/EBPβ/δ knockdown does not inhibit all changes associated with adipogenesis, but rather is specific to genes downstream of these factors. These data also indicate that the two isoforms of SREBP are regulated by different factors during adipogenesis.
To determine whether our observations in 3T3-L1 cells may extend to
in vivo adipocyte development, we examined gene expression in white adipose tissue isolated from
Cebpb-knockout mice.
Cebpb mRNA was undetectable in these samples (), while the expression of
Cebpa was significantly reduced (), as previously reported [
9]. Consistent with our results from cultured cells,
Srebp1c expression was significantly decreased in the white adipose tissue of these mice (). This suggests that C/EBP
β is also involved in the expression of SREBP1c in adipocytes
in vivo. In addition, the expression of
Srebp1a was not affected in mice lacking
Cebpb (), providing
in vivo support for our previous findings in cultured preadipocytes that SREBP1c, but not SREBP1a, is selectively regulated by C/EBP factors. We next sought to determine whether C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ could directly regulate SREBP1c through binding to its promoter. Examination of the putative promoter of SREBP1c revealed several potential C/EBP consensus-binding sites within the 4 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site. To assess binding to these putative sites we performed ChIP analysis, immunoprecipitating C/EBP
β or C/EBP
δ, and using real-time PCR to quantify binding to specific DNA sequences. Of nine putative binding sites identified, three showed significant binding of either C/EBP
β or C/EBP
δ, which was responsive to the induction of adipogenesis, whereas the other six did not (results not shown). The three responsive sites were designated site 1, site 2 and site 3, and are schematically represented in . As shown in , C/EBP
β binding to all three sites was increased during early differentiation, as C/EBP
β expression increases. Similarly these sites also bound C/EBP
δ with similar time courses in identically treated cells (). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that both C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ are direct upstream regulators of SREBP1c expression, directly binding to the SREBP1c promoter during early adipogenesis.
As has been previously described for the C/EBPα and DGAT2 promoters, among others, the maximal binding of C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ to the SREBP1c promoter lags behind the induction of these factors by several hours, probably due to the binding of inhibitory factors such as CHOP10 (C/EBP-homologous protein 10) and ETO. Similarly, the maximal binding of C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ precedes the peak of SREBP1c expression as has previously been observed for other well-characterized C/EBPβ/δ targets, probably due to the formation of inactive promoter-bound complexes that must be de-repressed for SREBP1c expression to occur.
We have previously observed that C/EBP
α replaces C/EBP
β as a major regulator of DGAT2 expression when the expression of the latter diminishes in the later stages of adipogenesis [
9]. Thus we investigated whether C/EBP
α might similarly take over the regulation of SREBP1c expression from C/EBP
β and C/EBP
δ as adipogenesis progresses. To test this we generated 3T3-L1 cells stably expressing shRNA targeting C/EBP
α to inhibit its expression. This led to a significant inhibition of C/EBP
α induction, which was reduced by 80 % or greater following induction of differentiation (). Consistent with the reciprocal regulation of PPAR
γ and C/EBP
α during adipogenesis, C/EBP
α inhibition also led to significant reduction in the expression of PPAR
γ in cells differentiated for 5 days (). The expression of key markers of the maturing adipocyte, including the fatty-acid-binding protein
aP2 and the insulin-sensitive
GLUT4, were also suppressed in cells in which C/EBP
α had been knocked down. Similarly, the expression of
DGAT2 was significantly inhibited in these cells, consistent with our previous study using preadipocytes transiently transfected with siRNA targeting C/EBP
α [
9]. In the same cells
SREBP1c expression was found to be inhibited by approx. 70 %at day 5 of differentiation. In contrast, the loss of C/EBP
α had no significant effect on the expression of the
SREBP1a isoform.
To determine whether the regulation of SREBP1c by C/EBPα could occur through direct binding of the same sites in the SREBP1c promoter occupied in early adipogenesis by C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ, we performed ChIP assays. C/EBPα was immunoprecipitated from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes differentiated for various times and bound DNA sequences corresponding to putative C/EBP-binding sites were assayed by real-time PCR. This revealed that site 1 inducibly binds C/EBPα as adipogenesis proceeds, replacing the binding by C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ 96 h after induction of differentiation (). In contrast, relatively weak binding was observed for C/EBPα to sites 2 and 3, and the marginal increases detected as adipogenesis progressed were not significant ().
Taken together, these results suggest that, during the later stages of adipogenesis, C/EBPα may substitute for C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ in the control of SREBP1c expression and that this involves binding to site 1 approx. 3.5 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site in the SREBP1c promoter.