PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of arthrestherBioMed Centralbiomed central web sitesearchsubmit a manuscriptregisterthis articleArthritis Research & Therapy
 
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010; 12(3): R99.
Published online 2010 May 20. doi:  10.1186/ar3029
PMCID: PMC2911886
Clinical and serological evaluation of a novel CENP-A peptide based ELISA
Michael Mahler,1,2 Liesbeth Maes,3 Daniel Blockmans,3 Rene Westhovens,3 Xavier Bossuyt,3 Gabriela Riemekasten,4 Sandra Schneider,4 Falk Hiepe,4 Andreas Swart,5 Irmgard Gürtler,5 Karl Egerer,6 Margrit Fooke,1,2 and Marvin J Fritzlercorresponding author7
1Dr. Fooke Laboratorien, Mainstrasse 85, 41469 Neuss, Germany
2Current address: Department of Immunopathology, INOVA Diagnostics, San Diego, CA 92131-1638, USA
3Laboratory Medicine, General internal medicine, Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Binkomstraat 2 3210 Lubbeek, Belgium
4Charité University Hospital, German Rheumatism Research Centre, a Leibniz institute, Dept Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
5Rheumatology Clinical Neuss, Neuss 41460, Germany
6Interdisziplinäres Autoimmun-Speziallabor, Charité University hospital, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
7Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada
corresponding authorCorresponding author.
Michael Mahler: m.mahler.job/at/web.de; Liesbeth Maes: liesbeth.maes/at/uz.kuleuven.ac.be; Daniel Blockmans: Daniel.Blockmans/at/uz.kuleuven.ac.be; Rene Westhovens: rene.westhovens/at/uz.kuleuven.ac.be; Xavier Bossuyt: xavier.bossuyt/at/uz.kuleuven.ac.be; Gabriela Riemekasten: Gabriela.riemekasten/at/charite.de; Sandra Schneider: sandra.schneider/at/charite.de; Falk Hiepe: falk.hiepe/at/charite.de; Andreas Swart: andreas.swart/at/arcor.de; Irmgard Gürtler: rheumalabor.neuss/at/arcor.de; Karl Egerer: karl.egerer/at/charite.de; Margrit Fooke: mfooke/at/fooke-labs.de; Marvin J Fritzler: fritzler/at/ucalgary.ca
Received October 18, 2009; Revised February 11, 2010; Accepted May 20, 2010.
Abstract
Introduction
Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) are useful biomarkers in the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). ACA are found in 20 to 40% of SSc patients and, albeit with lower prevalence, in patients with other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Historically, ACA were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells and confirmed by immunoassays using recombinant CENP-B. The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel CENP-A peptide ELISA.
Methods
Sera collected from SSc patients (n = 334) and various other diseases (n = 619) and from healthy controls (n = 175) were tested for anti-CENP-A antibodies by the novel CENP-A enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Furthermore, ACA were determined in the disease cohorts by IIF (ImmunoConcepts, Sacramento, CA, USA), CENP-B ELISA (Dr. Fooke), EliA® CENP (Phadia, Freiburg, Germany) and line-immunoassay (LIA, Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany). Serological and clinical associations of anti-CENP-A with other autoantibodies were conducted in one participating centre. Inhibition experiments with either the CENP-A peptide or recombinant CENP-B were carried out to analyse the specificity of anti-CENP-A and -B antibodies.
Results
The CENP-A ELISA results were in good agreement with other ACA detection methods. According to the kappa method, the qualitative agreements were: 0.73 (vs. IIF), 0.81 (vs. LIA), 0.86 (vs. CENP-B ELISA) and 0.97 (vs. EliA® CENP). The quantitative comparison between CENP-A and CENP-B ELISA using 265 samples revealed a correlation value of rho = 0.5 (by Spearman equation). The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the discrimination between SSc patients (n = 131) and various controls (n = 134) was significantly better using the CENP-A as compared to CENP-B ELISA (P < 0.0001). Modified Rodnan skin score was significantly lower in the CENP-A negative group compared to the positive patients (P = 0.013). Inhibition experiments revealed no significant cross reactivity of anti-CENP-A and anti-CENP-B antibodies. Statistically relevant differences for gender ratio (P = 0.0103), specific joint involvement (Jaccoud) (P = 0.0006) and anti-phospholipid syndrome (P = 0.0157) between ACA positive SLE patients and the entire SLE cohort were observed.
Conclusions
Anti-CENP-A antibodies as determined by peptide ELISA represent a sensitive, specific and independent marker for the detection of ACA and are useful biomarkers for the diagnosis of SSc. Our data suggest that anti-CENP-A antibodies are a more specific biomarker for SSc than antibodies to CENP-B. Furthers studies are required to verify these findings.
Articles from Arthritis Research & Therapy are provided here courtesy of
BioMed Central