Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jdstLink to Publisher's site
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 July; 4(4): 1008–1011.
Published online 2010 July 1. doi:  10.1177/193229681000400433
PMCID: PMC2909536

The Health Implications of Sucrose, High-Fructose Corn Syrup, and Fructose: What Do We Really Know?


The epidemic of obesity and related metabolic diseases continues to extract an enormous health toll. Multiple potential causes for obesity have been suggested, including increased fat consumption, increased carbohydrate consumption, decreased physical activity, and, most recently, increased fructose consumption. Most literature cited in support of arguments suggesting a link between obesity and fructose consumption is epidemiologic and does not establish cause and effect. The causes of obesity are well-known and involve the overconsumption of calories from all sources. Research employing a pure fructose model distorts the real-world situation of fructose consumption, which predominantly comes from sweeteners containing roughly equal proportions of glucose and fructose. The fructose hypothesis has the potential to distract us from further exploration and amelioration of known causes of obesity. Randomized prospective trials of metabolic consequences of fructose consumption at normal population levels and from sources typically found in the human diet such as sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup are urgently needed.

Keywords: fructose, high-fructose, corn syrup, obesity, sucrose


The epidemic of obesity and related metabolic diseases continues to extract an enormous health toll around the world. In the United States alone, over 68% of the adult population is now considered to be overweight or obese.1 The prevalence of adult obesity in the United States has grown at an alarming rate since 1995.2 Unfortunately, this epidemic is not confined to adults. The prevalence of childhood obesity in the United States has doubled since 1990.3 The epidemic of obesity is not confined only to the United States. Obesity rates are continuing to rise worldwide, making it a global health challenge.4

Obesity has clearly established links to coronary heart disease,5,6 type 2 diabetes,7 glucose intolerance,8 metabolic syndrome,9 sleep apnea and other sleep disorders,10 and many other chronic conditions and diseases. It has been suggested that, unless we get the obesity epidemic under control, many of the public health gains in leading causes of morbidity and mortality such as coronary heart disease achieved since 1990 may be wiped out.11 Furthermore, the current generation of children in the United States may be the first generation of Americans to have a shorter life expectancy than their parents.12

With all this as background, it is not surprising, and entirely appropriate, that the search for underlying causes of obesity has assumed a prominent place in our national health dialogue. Over the years, a variety of potential causes for obesity have been suggested, including increased fat consumption,13 increased carbohydrate consumption,14 increased consumption of high-fructose corn syrup,15 genetic and hormonal etiologies,16 and an inactive lifestyle.17 The newest potential “culprit” to be blamed for causing obesity is the consumption of fructose.18 While many arguments have been proffered attempting to link fructose consumption to obesity and related metabolic conditions, what do we really know and what is the quality of the evidence?

The Perfect Storm for Potential Mischaracterization of Fructose

All the elements are in place to create the potential for the “perfect storm” to mischaracterize the relationship of fructose to obesity. First, obesity is not only a significant health issue, it is also a deeply emotional one for many people. Second, making headway on the complex issue of obesity has been frustratingly difficult—in fact, we appear to be moving steadily in the wrong direction. Third, some research teams have focused their efforts in both human and animals on studies employing consumption of large amounts of pure fructose (rarely consumed in the human diet).1925 Further confusion has resulted from the erroneous extrapolation of these results to high-fructose corn syrup, which is a very different ingredient consisting of roughly equal proportions of glucose and fructose as opposed to pure fructose, which, as the name implies, consists of 100% fructose. Fourth, there is a general desire, particularly in the media and public, to seek simple solutions to complex, multifactorial conditions such as obesity. For all these reasons, there has been a tendency, premature in my estimation, to link fructose consumption as a major contributor to obesity and related metabolic conditions.

Epidemiologic Studies Do Not Establish Cause and Effect

Most of the studies being cited to support the proposed linkages between fructose consumption and obesity and other metabolic conditions employ epidemiologic data that establishes associations rather than cause and effect.2629

Numerous examples exist to demonstrate the dangers of this approach. The recommendation to consume anti-oxidant supplements to lower the risk of heart disease and cancer was widely followed until prospective studies demonstrated their lack of efficacy.30 Hormone replacement therapy for postmenopausal women was prescribed by a generation of physicians until the Women’s Health Initiative demonstrated its lack of efficacy in most segments of this population.31 A unique linkage between high-fructose corn syrup and obesity postulated by Bray and colleagues15 in 2004 based on epidemiologic data has now been widely discounted by the scientific community based on prospective data. Major professional groups such as the American Medical Association32 and the American Dietetic Association33 have issued statements refuting a unique linkage between high-fructose corn syrup and obesity. An unfortunate aftermath of this saga is that, while the debate on this issue is over in the scientific community, serious misperceptions persist in the public domain and nonrefereed vehicles such as the Internet.

The Causes of Obesity Are Well-Known

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, there was a per capita increase of 24% in the number of calories consumed in the United States between 1970 and 2005.34 This represents an average per capita increase of 605 Kcal/day. An analysis by Swinburn and associates35 concluded that this caloric increase could entirely account for the increased prevalence of obesity in the United States since 1975. During this period of time, the increase of calories from all fructose-containing sweeteners combined rose by only 52 Kcal/day and, as a percentage of total calories consumed, actually declined.34 Fructose consumption has declined in the United States since 199936 while obesity levels have increased or stayed stable in all population groups.1 There is widespread agreement in the obesity research community that overconsumption of calories from all sources is the major driving force behind the obesity epidemic.

Studies on How Pure Fructose May Distort Metabolic Pathways

Studies performed employing a model comparing 25% of calories from either pure fructose or pure glucose (neither found in large quantities in the human diet) suggested differences in energy-regulating hormones such as insulin, leptin, and ghrelin, which could theoretically lead to increased appetite and caloric consumption.37 However, when these studies were repeated in a laboratory38 employing the “real-world” comparison of sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup, all differences in insulin, leptin, ghrelin, appetite, and caloric consumption at the next meal disappeared. Other laboratories have generated similar findings.20,39 It is important to emphasize that sucrose, the leading source of fructose in the American diet and overwhelmingly the leading source of fructose consumption40 worldwide, and high-fructose corn syrup, as well as virtually all of the nutritive sweeteners commonly found in the American diet, are combinations of glucose and fructose in roughly equal proportions and are nutritionally interchangeable.


While the fructose hypothesis is an interesting one, it poses the danger of distracting us from further exploration and amelioration of the known causes of obesity and related metabolic conditions. It is important to remember that many of the metabolic abnormalities currently being postulated as attributable to fructose consumption may also be ascribed to obesity itself.

The epidemiologic evidence being cited to support metabolic abnormalities related to fructose consumption leaves many questions unanswered. There are compelling data to support excessive caloric consumption as the major dietary driver of obesity. The fructose hypothesis is based largely on epidemiologic data that do not establish cause and effect. All too often, we have been led astray by confusing associations with cause and effect. With the fructose argument, we are in danger of repeating mistakes frequently made in the past by basing judgments on insufficient evidence. Perhaps the American poet and philosopher George Santayana41 summed up this danger most succinctly when he stated “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”


1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235–241. [PubMed]
2. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children adolescents, and adults 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004;291(23):2847–250. [PubMed]
3. Dietz WH, Robinson TN. Clinical practice. Overweight children and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2005;325(20):2100–2109. [PubMed]
4. Accessed March 27, 2010.
5. Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, Hong Y, Stern JS, Pi-Sunyer FX, Eckel RH, American Heart Association, Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association scientific statement on obesity and heart disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2006;113(6):898–918. [PubMed]
6. Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, Culebras A, DeGraba TJ, Gorelick PB, Guyton JR, Hart RG, Howard G, Kelly-Hayes M, Nixon JV, Sacco RL, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association Stroke Council Primary prevention of ischemic strokes: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. 2006;113(24):e873–e923. [PubMed]
7. Field AE, Coakley EH, Must A, Spadano JL, Laird N, Dietz WH, Rimm E, Colditz GA. Impact of overweight on the risk of developing common chronic diseases during a 10-year period. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(13):1581–1586. [PubMed]
8. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM, Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Grundy SM. What is the contribution of obesity to the metabolic syndrome? Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2004;33(2):267–282. [PubMed]
10. Rippe JM. The case for medical management of obesity: a call for increased physician involvement. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 1):23S–33S. [PubMed]
11. King DE, Mainous AG III, Carnemolla M, Everett CJ. Adherence to healthy lifestyle habits in US adults, 1988-2006. Am J Med. 2009;122(6):528–534. [PubMed]
12. The William J. Clinton Foundation. Accessed March 24, 2010.
13. Jéquier E, Bray GA. Low-fat diets are preferred. Am J Med. 2002;113(Suppl 9B):41S–46S. [PubMed]
14. Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels SR, D’Alessio DA. A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(4):1617–1623. [PubMed]
15. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(4):537–543. [PubMed]
16. Melanson KJ, McInnis KJ, Rippe JM, Blackburn G, Wilson PF. Obesity and cardiovascular disease risk: research update. Cardiol Rev. 2001;9(4):202–207. [PubMed]
17. Rippe JM, Hess S. The role of physical activity in the prevention and management of obesity. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98(10) Suppl 2:S31–S38. [PubMed]
18. Bray GA. Fructose: should we worry? Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32(Suppl 7):S127–S131. [PubMed]
19. Teff KL, Grudziak J, Townsend RR, Dunn TN, Grant RW, Adams SH, Keim NL, Cummings BP, Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals in obese men and women: influence of insulin resistance on plasma triglyceride responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1562–1569. [PubMed]
20. Stanhope KL, Griffen SC, Bair BR, Swarbrick MM, Keim NL, Havel PJ. Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-, sucrose-, fructose-, and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(5):1194–1203. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Fructose consumption: recent results and their potential implications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1190(1):15–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Cummings BP, Stanhope KL, Graham JL, Evans JL, Baskin DG, Griffen SC, Havel PJ. Dietary fructose accelerates the development of diabetes in UCD-T2DM rats: amelioration by the antioxidant, {alpha}-lipoic acid. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010 [Epub ahead of print.] [PubMed]
23. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Fructose consumption: considerations for future research on its effects on adipose distribution, lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity in humans. J Nutr. 2009;139(6):1236S–1241S. [PubMed]
24. Stanhope KL, Schwarz JM, Keim NL, Griffen SC, Bremer AA, Graham JL, Hatcher B, Cox CL, Dyachenko A, Zhang W, McGahan JP, Seibert A, Krauss RM, Chiu S, Schaefer EJ, Ai M, Otokozawa S, Nakajima K, Nakano T, Beysen C, Hellerstein MK, Berglund L, Havel PJ. Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(5):1322–1334. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Stanhope KL, Havel PJ. Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming beverages sweetened with fructose, glucose, sucrose, or high-fructose corn syrup. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(6):1733S–1737S. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Schulze MB, Manson JE, Ludwig DS, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, weight gain, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. JAMA. 2004;292(8):927–934. [PubMed]
27. Bachman CM, Baranowski T, Nicklas TA. Is there an association between sweetened beverages and adiposity? Nutr Rev. 2006;64(4):153–174. [PubMed]
28. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):274–288. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Johnson L, Mander AP, Jones LR, Emmett PM, Jebb SA. Is sugar-sweetened beverage consumption associated with increased fatness in children? Nutrition. 2007;23(7-8):557–563. [PubMed]
30. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR, Glass A, Keogh JP, Meyskens FL, Valanis B, Williams JH, Barnhart S, Hammar S. Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Eng J Med. 1996;334(18):1150–1155. [PubMed]
31. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J, Writing Group for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–333. [PubMed]
32. American Medical Association. Report of the Council on Science and Public Health Accessed March 24, 2010.
33. American Dietetic Association. 2008 hot topics, “high fructose corn syrup.” Accessed March 24, 2010.
34. Buzby J, Wells HF, USDA-Economic Research Service Loss-adjusted food availability data: calories. March 24, 2010.
35. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Ravussin E. Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1453–1456. [PubMed]
36. Marriott BP, Cole N, Lee E. National estimates of dietary fructose intake increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States. J Nutr. 2009;139(6):1228S–1235S. [PubMed]
37. Teff KL, Elliott SS, Tschöp M, Kieffer TJ, Rader D, Heiman M, Townsend RR, Keim NL, D’Alessio D, Havel PJ. Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2963–2972. [PubMed]
38. Melanson KJ, Zukley L, Lowndes J, Nguyen V, Angelopoulos TJ, Rippe JM. Effects of high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose consumption on circulating glucose, insulin, leptin, and ghrelin and on appetite in normal-weight women. Nutrition. 2007;23(2):103–112. [PubMed]
39. Soenen S, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. No differences in satiety or energy intake after high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, or milk preloads. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(6):1586–1594. [PubMed]
40. Fereday N, Forber G, Girardello S, Midgley C, Nutt T, Powell N, Todd M. Sweetener analysis. Oxford: LMC International Ltd; 2007. HFCS industry annual review—a year of changing expectations.
41. Santayana G. The Life of Reason. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1906.

Articles from Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology are provided here courtesy of Diabetes Technology Society