PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2010; 5(7): e11752.
Published online 2010 July 23. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0011752
PMCID: PMC2909261

The Alcohol Dehydrogenase System in the Xylose-Fermenting Yeast Candida maltosa

Julian Rutherford, Editor

Abstract

Background

The alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) system plays a critical role in sugar metabolism involving in not only ethanol formation and consumption but also the general “cofactor balance” mechanism. Candida maltosa is able to ferment glucose as well as xylose to produce a significant amount of ethanol. Here we report the ADH system in C. maltosa composed of three microbial group I ADH genes (CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B), mainly focusing on its metabolic regulation and physiological function.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Genetic analysis indicated that CmADH2A and CmADH2B tandemly located on the chromosome could be derived from tandem gene duplication. In vitro characterization of enzymatic properties revealed that all the three CmADHs had broad substrate specificities. Homo- and heterotetramers of CmADH1 and CmADH2A were demonstrated by zymogram analysis, and their expression profiles and physiological functions were different with respect to carbon sources and growth phases. Fermentation studies of ADH2A-deficient mutant showed that CmADH2A was directly related to NAD regeneration during xylose metabolism since CmADH2A deficiency resulted in a significant accumulation of glycerol.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results revealed that CmADH1 was responsible for ethanol formation during glucose metabolism, whereas CmADH2A was glucose-repressed and functioned to convert the accumulated ethanol to acetaldehyde. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of function separation and glucose repression of ADH genes in xylose-fermenting yeasts. On the other hand, CmADH1 and CmADH2A were both involved in ethanol formation with NAD regeneration to maintain NADH/NAD ratio in favor of producing xylitol from xylose. In contrast, CmADH2B was expressed at a much lower level than the other two CmADH genes, and its function is to be further confirmed.

Introduction

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), which catalyzes the interconversion between acetaldehyde and ethanol, plays a central role in ethanol production and assimilation. Moreover, as NAD(H) or NADP(H) takes part in the reaction, ADH is involved in the general “cofactor balance” mechanism [1]. Yeast ADH belongs to the group I long chain (approximately 350 residues per subunit) zinc-dependent enzymes of microbial NAD- or NADP-dependent dehydrogenases [2]. Although the primary nucleotide and amino acid sequences of yeast ADHs are highly conserved, the members, physiological functions and metabolic regulations of the ADH systems vary among different yeast species. Furthermore, only one or two essential ADH genes are highly expressed and responsible for ethanol formation and assimilation in the majority of yeasts during glucose or xylose metabolism.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ScADH1 encodes the classical fermentative enzyme responsible for ethanol generation, and is expressed in large amounts in the presence of glucose [3], [4]. ScADH2 encodes the enzyme that converts ethanol to acetaldehyde, and is negatively regulated by glucose [5]. Recently, Thomson et al. [6] resurrected the last common ancestor of ScADH1 and ScADH2 using ancestral sequence reconstruction and kinetic analysis, and identified that the ancestor was optimized in favor of making (not consuming) ethanol, resembling the modern ScADH1. After the ScADH1/ScADH2 duplication, ScADH2 conferred a novel function of consuming ethanol. In contrast to function separation and glucose-dependent regulation of ADH1 and ADH2 in S. cerevisiae, ADH1 [7], [8] of Pichia stipitis, a natural xylose-fermenting yeast which is well studied for ethanol production, encodes the principal ADH with both fermentative and assimilatory functions, and is induced by oxygen limitation. PsADH2 [8] is not expressed under aerobic or oxygen-limited conditions unless PsADH1 is disrupted.

In xylose-fermenting yeasts, D-xylose is first reduced to xylitol and sequentially oxidized to D-xylulose by xylose reductase (XR) and xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH), respectively [9]. Cofactor imbalance would arise under anaerobic or oxygen-limited conditions since XDH is considered to be specific for NAD, while XR predominantly uses NADPH and no mechanism exists to reduce NADP with NADH [10]. In P. stipitis, the dual cofactor (NADPH and NADH) specificity of XR [11] could partially make up the cofactor imbalance and thus it could efficiently ferment xylose to ethanol under oxygen-limited conditions. While in some xylose-fermenting yeasts, such as Candida tropicalis and Candida guilliermondii, xylitol is largely accumulated due to the cofactor imbalance between NADPH-dependent XR and NAD-dependent XDH [12]. Our previous results [13] showed that C. maltosa accumulated xylitol with high substrate consumption rates and product yields in the batch fermentation under oxygen-limited conditions. XR of C. maltosa was exclusively NADPH-dependent, but NADP-dependent XDH activities were detected, which leaded to a significant accumulation of ethanol. Furthermore, C. maltosa showed a strong ability to produce ethanol from glucose similar to that of S. cerevisiae under aerobic conditions. However, the ADH system related to ethanol production of C. maltosa has not yet been studied in detail.

Hence, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize and elucidate composition and regulation of the ADH system in C. maltosa and its physiological function during glucose or xylose metabolism. As a consequence, the investigation would contribute to a better understanding of regulatory properties of fermenting both glucose and xylose to produce ethanol and other high-valued bio-products, e.g. xylitol, in natural xylose-utilizing yeasts.

Results

Cloning and genetic analysis of three distinct ADH genes in C. maltosa

Based on sequences of the ADH genes of Candida albicans [14] and C. tropicalis [15], two distinct DNA fragments harboring C. maltosa ADH genes were successfully obtained (Figure S1). One DNA fragment of 4415 bp was confirmed to contain a 1053-bp long uninterrupted open reading frame (ORF) showing high similarity with C. albicans ADH1 (87.7%) and C. tropicalis ADH1 (87.3%), and therefore this ORF was designated CmADH1. The other DNA fragment of 4660 bp was interestingly found to contain two tandem 1050-bp long ORFs that were both similar to C. albicans ADH2. Thus, the upstream and downstream ORFs were designated CmADH2A and CmADH2B, respectively (Figure S1). The phenomenon of tandem adjacent CmADH2A and CmADH2B was also confirmed in some other strains of C. maltosa (ATCC 28140 and AS 2.1386) by PCR cloning (Table S1) and subsequent sequencing.

The alignment of ADHs from different yeasts manifested that all the three C. maltosa ADH proteins seemed to be localized in the cytoplasm, because they did not possess N-terminal mitochondrial targeting signals (Box I, Figure S2) as described in S. cerevisiae ADH3 [16] and Kluyveromyces lactis ADH3 and ADH4 [17]. In addition, two typical motifs of the microbial group I ADHs [2] were found in CmADHs. One motif (Box II, Figure S2) matched the Zn-binding consensus (GHEXXGXXXXXGXXV). The other motif (Box III, Figure S2) was similar to the GXGXXG fingerprint pattern of the NAD-binding domain.

To better understand the phenomenon of tandem adjacent CmADH2A and CmADH2B and evolution of the ADH system in C. maltosa, we deduced the process of gene duplication and gene loss of ADH homologs from some Saccharomycotina species. Based on those reported previously [6], [18], the evolutionary model of yeast ADH genes was enriched as follows (Figure 1). The ancestral yeast species contained only one cytoplasmic ADH. After divergence from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the ADH in the ancestor of the Saccharomyces complex was duplicated and one copy became localized to the mitochondrion. In contrast, the ADH in the ancestor of the CTG clade was independently duplicated since there were no conserved gene orders or contents in ADH regions between the CTG clade and the Saccharomyces complex, and two duplicated ADH genes were retained to encode cytoplasmic ADHs. Furthermore, more ADH duplications occurred in some diploid species than in haploid species in the CTG clade. Comparative analysis of genomic contexts of ADH homologs from species of the CTG clade exhibited that CmADH1 and CmADH2A were the orthologs of PsADH1 and PsADH2, respectively (Figure S3). Following the speciation of diploid and haploid species in the CTG clade, C. maltosa has independently undergone once tandem ADH gene duplication event in its evolutionary history, resulting in modern tandem adjacent CmADH2A and CmADH2B. C. tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis seemed to have also duplicated their ADH gene(s) independently in their respective evolutionary history, resulting in their modern ADH systems encoded by more than two ADH genes, but none of their ADH genes were adjacent (genomic contexts of ADH genes other than ADH1 and ADH2 were not shown).

Figure 1
Minimum number of events required to explain evolution of ADH genes in some Saccharomycotina species.

In vitro characterization of recombinant C. maltosa ADH proteins

The recombinant CmADH proteins with His-tags were purified and used for subsequent characterization of enzymatic properties as described in Materials and Methods. The clear single band of each recombinant CmADH corresponding to about 40 kDa protein was observed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2).

Figure 2
SDS-PAGE of purified recombinant CmADH1 (lane 1, 5 µg), CmADH2A (lane 2, 5 µg) and CmADH2B (lane 3, 10 µg).

ADH activities of CmADHs were tested with NAD or NADP as cofactor to determine cofactor preference. The specific activity of CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B with NAD was 24, 31 and 11 times higher than those with NADP (Table S2), respectively. These data indicated that all the three CmADHs preferred NAD to NADP as cofactor. The kinetic parameters of CmADHs for the substrates (ethanol and acetaldehyde) and the cofactors (NAD and NADH) were examined (Table 1). Among the three CmADHs, CmADH1 showed the lowest affinities to the cofactors, while CmADH2B showed the lowest affinities to the substrates. Moreover, all the three CmADHs showed more similar Km(ethanol) values to those reported for ScADH1(17–24 mM) than for ScADH2 (0.6–0.8 mM) [6].

Table 1
Kinetic properties of CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B.

ADH activities of CmADHs towards nineteen alcohols, including aliphatic, aromatic and unsaturated alcohols, were measured to characterize their substrate specificities (Figure 3). All the three CmADHs showed a single peak in activity towards primary alcohols with C1–C7 carbon chains, although the carbon chain length of the primary alcohol which gave the highest relative activity was different. CmADH1 showed almost no activity towards secondary and branched alcohols. CmADH2A had higher relative activities towards secondary alcohols such as 2-propanol and 2-butanol than CmADH2B, while the relative activities of CmADH2B toward branched alcohols were higher than those of CmADH2A. CmADH1 and CmADH2A had low relative activities toward diols, but CmADH2B showed a very high relative activity on 1,4-butanediol. As for glycerol and acetone, all the three CmADHs had no or very low activities. Interestingly, CmADH2A and CmADH2B had high activities toward allyl alcohol that were identical to ethanol, but CmADH1 had a low relative activity of 6.04%. In addition, CmADH1 and CmADH2A showed higher relative activities toward cinnamyl alcohol than CmADH2B.

Figure 3
Relative specific activity of CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B on various alcohols.

Expression profiles and physiological functions of ADH genes in C. maltosa on different carbon sources and during sugar metabolism

First of all, the correspondence between the native and recombinant CmADH isozymes was determined by zymogram analysis (Figure 4). C. maltosa produced multiple forms of ADH isozymes (Figure 4A, lane 1 and 2) including five clearly separated moving bands. The recombinant CmADH1 (Figure 4A, lane 3) and CmADH2A (Figure 4B, lane 2 and 3) comigrated with the fastest and the slowest moving band present in crude extracts of C. maltosa. The recombinant CmADH2B (Figure 4C, lane 2) displayed a more diffuse band that comigrated with another two slow-moving bands. Furthermore, the mixed crude extracts of the recombinant CmADH1 and CmADH2A (Figure 4D) were identified a similar electrophoretic pattern of ADH isozymes to crude extracts of C. maltosa, while other mixtures of crude extracts from recombinant E. coli (CmADH1 and CmADH2B, CmADH2A and CmADH2B) did not reveal the similar patterns (data not shown). Therefore, the fastest and the slowest moving isozymes could be the CmADH1 homotetramer and the CmADH2A homotetramer, respectively, and three middle migrating bands should represent heterotetramers formed between the CmADH1 and CmADH2A gene products with different ratio (1[ratio]3, 2[ratio]2 and 361) (Figure 4D). Similar heterotetramer formation between ADH isozymes has also been reported in S. cerevisiae [19], [20] and K. lactis [21], [22]. In addition, there seemed to be no clear band corresponding to the ADH isozyme encoded by CmADH2B in crude extracts of C. maltosa. This has implicated that CmADH2B was probably produced at a very low level, or not produced at all under normal physiological conditions.

Figure 4
Zymogram analysis of ADH isozymes from C. maltosa Xu316 and recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3).

To examine the distinctive expression modes of CmADHs, protein profiles of CmADH isozymes were investigated with respect to carbon sources (Figure 5). When C. maltosa cells were grown in medium containing the fermentable carbon source glucose or xylose, CmADH isozymes were mainly composed of the CmADH1 homotetramer (Panel A) and the heterotetramers of CmADH1 and CmADH2A, while the CmADH2A homotetramer (Panel B, top band) was undetectable in the presence of glucose or faintly detectable in the presence of xylose. However, when C. maltosa cells were grown in the presence of ethanol as a sole carbon source (lane 2), the CmADH2A homotetramer was the only detectable CmADH isozyme. These results have implicated that CmADH1 could be expressed during fermentative metabolism to reduce acetaldehyde to ethanol, while CmADH2A should be expressed under respiratory conditions to serve ethanol assimilation.

Figure 5
Expression of CmADH isozymes of C. maltosa Xu316 on different carbon sources.

To further elucidate the respective physiological functions of CmADH1 and CmADH2A during sugar metabolism, expression profiles of CmADH isozymes were analyzed (Figure 6). During glucose metabolism, the CmADH1 homotetramer was gradually produced after the exponential phase initiated, whereas the CmADH2A homotetramer seemed to increase from the late exponential phase after glucose was consumed. At the same time, the heterotetramers of CmADH1 and CmADH2A as 1[ratio]3 and 2[ratio]2 increased with CmADH2A overproduction. These results suggested that CmADH1 was responsible for ethanol formation, while CmADH2A was glucose-repressed and responsible for converting the accumulated ethanol to acetaldehyde after glucose was consumed. As for xylose metabolism, the expression profiles of CmADH isozymes were nearly similar to those during glucose metabolism. However, the expression of CmADH2A during xylose metabolism was initiated in the early exponential phase and much earlier than during glucose metabolism, which implicated that the physiological function of CmADH2A would be different during glucose and xylose metabolism.

Figure 6
Expressions of CmADH isozymes of C. maltosa Xu316 during glucose (A) or xylose (B) metabolism under aerobic conditions.

Screening and characterization of ADH2A-deficient mutants and physiological function of CmADH2A

C. maltosa ADH2A-deficient mutant was isolated and characterized to further reveal the physiological function of CmADH2A especially during xylose metabolism. The selection procedure was based on the ability of ADH to oxidize allyl alcohol to acrolein, an unsaturated aldehyde which is very toxic to cells [23]. When cells were incubated on media supplemented with a certain concentration of allyl alcohol, only those clones with reduced ADH activity were able to grow. It is known that allyl alcohol can be used as a select agent to isolate ADH-deficient mutants of some yeast species, such as S. cerevisiae [19], [24], K. lactis [25], [26] and C. guilliermondii [27]. Similarly, six mutants of C. maltosa Xu316, resistant to 400 mM allyl alcohol, were isolated. After zymogram analysis, the CmADH2A homotetramer dramatically decreased in these mutants (Figure S4), which indicated that all the mutants should be ADH2A-deficient. However, CmADH2A was still produced at a low level in the mutants because the heterotetramer of CmADH1 and CmADH2A as 3[ratio]1 was detected. We chose one of the six mutants, M3-400, for subsequent investigations.

To determine whether expression changes of CmADH2A occurred at the transcriptional level, mRNA levels of CmADHs in wild type strain Xu316 and ADH2A-deficient mutant M3-400 grown on different carbon sources under aerobic conditions were investigated and compared (Figure 7). In wild type strain (Figure 7A), CmADH1 was significantly expressed in all substrates except for in ethanol, while CmADH2A was more highly expressed than CmADH1 only in ethanol medium. The third ADH gene, CmADH2B, showed very low expressions in all substrates. These results were consistent to the previous zymogram analysis of CmADH isozymes (Figure 5). In ADH2A-deficient mutant, transcription of CmADH2A dramatically decreased (Figure 7B). CmADH2A deficiency slightly increased CmADH1 expression in glucose medium and decreased CmADH1 expression in other substrates. On the other hand, CmADH2A deficiency significantly increased CmADH2B expression from 3 fold to 33 fold in either fermentable or non-fermentable carbon source especially xylose and glycerol, but CmADH2B expression was still much lower than CmADH1 expression in ADH2A-deficient mutant. Therefore, mutations of CmADH2A deficiency might occur at the transcriptional level rather than in the structural gene since CmADH2A was still transcribed and expressed at a very low level in ADH2A-deficient mutant, and CmADH2A deficiency had different effects on the transcriptions of CmADH1 and CmADH2B.

Figure 7
mRNA levels of three CmADH genes in wide type strain Xu316 (A) and their changes in ADH2A-deficient mutant M3-400 (B).

ADH2A-deficient mutant M3-400 was compared to wild type strain Xu316 for the same sugar fermentation (glucose or xylose) under the same aeration conditions (aerobic or oxygen-limited) (Table 2). Compared with Xu316, the maximum substrate consumption rates (qsmax) decreased by approximately half in ADH2A-deficient mutant M3-400, while CmADH2A deficiency had little effect on the maximum specific growth rates (μmax) or the biomass yields (Yx/s). At the same time, CmADH2A deficiency had almost no effect on the ethanol yields (Yp/s, ethanol) from glucose, but resulted in lower ethanol yields and significant accumulations of glycerol from xylose. Intriguingly, the xylitol yield (Yp/s, xylitol) clearly decreased in ADH2A-deficient mutant M3-400 under oxygen-limited conditions. Furthermore, M3-400 accumulated more glycerol under oxygen-limited conditions than under aerobic conditions. Glycerol has been reported to serve as a redox sink by oxidizing the excess NADH to NAD in S. cerevisiae [28]. These results have confirmed that CmADH2A would facilitate ethanol production from xylose and seemed to be important for xylitol production of C. maltosa under oxygen-limited conditions.

Table 2
Comparison of fermentative parameters of wild type strain (Xu316) and ADH2A-deficient mutant (M3-400) of C. maltosa.

Discussion

C. maltosa shows great potential to utilize xylose [13], which is abundant in the renewable lignocellulosic biomass and one of important substrates for the future biotechnology applications. The ADH system is indispensable for sugar metabolism and ethanol production. However, the ADH system of C. maltosa has not yet been determined. Here we have cloned and sequenced three distinct structural ADH genes (CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B) from C. maltosa. Intriguingly, CmADH2A and CmADH2B were tandem adjacent genes, and this is the first reported phenomenon in yeast, although the ADH genes are often arranged in tandem in some other organisms, such as human and mouse [29]. Nucleotide and amino acid sequence analysis suggested that all the three CmADHs might be localized in the cytoplasm and fitted in the microbial group I ADHs.

In vitro characterization of enzymatic properties showed that all the three CmADHs were NAD-dependent, and had broad substrate specificities similar to ScADH2 [18], ADHs of K. lactis [30], Candida utilis ADH1 [31] and ADHs of C. guilliermondii [27]. But ScADH1 [18] is different from other yeast ADHs in its inability to catalyze longer chain alcohols. The narrow substrate specificity of ScADH1 has been reported to be the result of alterations in its substrate binding cleft that Met-270 of ScADH1 has substituted by Leu in other yeast ADHs [32]. Compared with CmADH1 and CmADH2A, CmADH2B had more different residues (Figure S2, indicated by reversed letters) in the substrate-binding pocket, which might be one of the factors contributing to the higher relative activities of CmADH2B toward some branched alcohols and 1,4-butanediol than CmADH1 and CmADH2A.

During glucose metabolism, CmADH1 was induced in presence of glucose, while CmADH2A was glucose-repressed and largely expressed after glucose was consumed (Figure 5 and and6A).6A). This means that C. maltosa converts glucose into ethanol via acetaldehyde with CmADH1, and then consumes the accumulated ethanol with CmADH2A. Moreover, CmADH2A seemed not to be responsible for ethanol production from glucose, which was confirmed by the fermentation studies of ADH2A-deficient mutant, where CmADH2A deficiency almost did not affect the ethanol yields from glucose (Table 2). Hence, the expression regulation and the physiological function of the CmADH1/CmADH2A system in C. maltosa were essentially similar to those of the ScADH1/ScADH2 system in S. cerevisiae during glucose metabolism [6], [33]. In contrast, the ancestral yeast species seems to contain one cytoplasmic ADH [18], and a dual function of an ADH gene responsible for both formation and consumption of ethanol have been described for PsADH1 of P. stipitis [7], PaADH1 of Pichia anomala [34] and CaADH1 of C. albicans [14]. Gene duplications lead to the modern ADH system composed of more than one ADH genes during yeast evolution (Figure 1). Moreover, duplicated ADH genes have evolved to play different physiological functions and be regulated in different modes. The ScADH1/ScADH2 duplication, along with their function separation and glucose repression of ScADH2, provide the molecular basis for S. cerevisiae to have a remarkable trait of producing ethanol in high concentrations even in the presence of oxygen [6], [33]. Thus, the CmADH1/CmADH2A system would also enable C. maltosa to accumulate a large amount of ethanol from glucose. According to our fermentation studies, C. maltosa was truly able to ferment a high concentration of glucose to produce a large amount of ethanol even in presence of oxygen (data not shown).

Based on the expression analysis of CmADH isozymes and fermentation studies of ADH2A-deficient mutant, it was found that CmADH1 and CmADH2A were both expressed and involved into ethanol formation during xylose metabolism. This has implicated that the ADH system of C. maltosa, a xylitol-producing yeast, is different from that of the ethanol-producing yeast P. stipitis, in which PsADH1 is the critical gene responsible for ethanol production [7]. As for other xylitol-producing yeasts, no information is currently available regarding expression regulation and physiological functions of their ADH genes during xylose metabolism. It has been reported that oxygen limitation stimulates xylitol accumulation due to the inhibition of XDH activity by increased NADH concentration, and NAD regeneration is equally important for xylitol accumulation under oxygen-limited conditions [12]. C. tropicalis and C. guilliermondii can regenerate NAD by accumulation of ethanol and glycerol and by glycerol accumulation [12], respectively. CmADH2A deficiency partially reduced NAD regeneration due to the decreased ethanol yield whether the cells were grown under aerobic conditions or oxygen-limited conditions. Under aerobic conditions, NAD might be still efficiently regenerated via respiratory pathways and by glycerol accumulation, and thus the xylitol yield was not affected by CmADH2A deficiency. However, under oxygen-limited conditions, NAD regeneration via respiratory pathways is restricted, and ADH2A-deficient mutant seemed to regenerate NAD by accumulating more glycerol at the expense of the decreased xylitol yield. Therefore, the main physiological function of the ADH system in C. maltosa seemed to regenerate NAD by ethanol accumulation to maintain NADH/NAD ratio in favor of producing xylitol from xylose.

In contrast to CmADH1 and CmADH2A, CmADH2B was expressed at a very low level in wild type strain and ADH2A-deficient mutant, although the expression was up-regulated to some extent with CmADH2A deficiency. In other yeasts, there are some similar ADH genes, e.g. ADH5 in S. cerevisiae, which are not expressed under normal physiological conditions. However, ScADH5 can produce ethanol in an ADH1/ADH3 double null mutant [35], and its transcription is up-regulated in a recombinant S. cerevisiae strain capable of anaerobic growth on xylose, which is not normally utilized by yeasts in the absence of oxygen [36]. CmADH2B was significantly up-regulated in ADH2A-deficient mutant grown on xylose, but its precise function remains to be investigated.

In summary, three microbial group I ADH genes of C. maltosa, CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B, were cloned and characterized. CmADH1 had the similar physiological function to ADH1 in S. cerevisiae and P. stipitis. However, the expression regulation and the physiological function of CmADH2A were more similar to ScADH2 than to PsADH2, although CmADH2A were the ortholog of PsADH2 according to comparative analysis of genomic contexts of ADH homologs. Furthermore, CmADH2A did not show a significantly low Km for ethanol like ScADH2 [6], suggesting that the evolution of CmADH2A might be due to the acquirement of glucose repression instead of high affinity to ethanol. In terms of xylose metabolism in natural xylose-fermenting yeasts, previous studies mainly focus on metabolic reconstruction and optimization of xylose to xylulose-5-phosphate, which are catalyzed by XR, XDH and xylulokinase. We are now investigating regulation factors of CmADH2A to reveal the mechanism of glucose repression in C. maltosa. From an evolutionary standpoint, glucose repression of CmADH2A is presumably acquired after the speciation of C. maltosa and P. stipitis. Moreover, the regulation mechanism of glucose repression in C. maltosa might be different from that in S. cerevisiae, which is thought to basically derive from the whole genome duplication event [37]. All these information suggested that C. maltosa should be a potential model for studying yeast sugar metabolism, and a significant candidate for the future utilization of glucose and xylose from renewable lignocelluloses to produce fuel ethanol and other high-valued bio-products.

Materials and Methods

Strains, culture conditions and metabolite analysis

C. maltosa Xu316, a wild type strain from our laboratory collection, was used as a source for the ADH genes. C. maltosa ATCC 28140 and AS 2.1386 from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) were used as reference strains. C. maltosa M3-400, a spontaneous mutant deficient in ADH2A, was derived from Xu316 and isolated by using allyl alcohol as a select agent as reported for C. guilliermondii [27]. E. coli DH5α was used for cloning, and BL21(DE3) for overproduction of the recombinant C. maltosa ADH proteins.

Yeast cells were grown at 30°C in YP (per liter, 10 g yeast extract, 20 g peptone, pH 5.5) medium containing different carbon sources for different times as specified in the text, and collected for ADH expression analysis using zymogram analysis or quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Inocula were grown in flask for 12 h, and initial cells were adjusted to OD600 = 0.2. In non-controlled shake flask fermentation, aerobic and oxygen-limited conditions were achieved by varying the volume of medium and the speed of shaking as described earlier [38], [39] with YP medium containing 80 g/l glucose or xylose. Fermentation broth was centrifuged at 12000 r/min for 10 min and the supernatant was used to quantify metabolites. Glucose, xylose, xylitol, ethanol and glycerol were determined by HPLC with a refractive index (RI) detector and an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio Rad Laboratories). Cell growth was monitored by measuring the turbidity at 600 nm. One OD unit corresponds to a dry weight of 0.429 g/l.

Cloning and genetic analysis of C. maltosa ADH genes

The complete fragments of C. maltosa ADH genes were obtained by degenerate PCR and cassette-mediated PCR following with nested PCR (Figure S1). PCR reaction was performed using ExTaq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa) with genomic DNA of C. maltosa Xu316 as the template. Assembly of the sequenced PCR fragments and pairwise sequence comparison were performed using the computer software DNAMAN. Multiple sequence alignment was constructed with the Clustal×program [40]. Gene duplication events of yeast ADHs were studied using comparative analysis of their genomic contexts. The genomic contexts of yeast ADH genes used in this study were obtained from the following databases: the Candida database at the Broad Institute (Candida species and Debaryomyces hansenii), the GeneDB (Candida dubliniensis), the Map View of NCBI (P. stipitis and P. guilliermondii), and the Yeast Gene Order Browser (some yeast species in the Saccharomyces complex).

Heterologous expression of recombinant CmADHs

The ORF fragments of CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B were subcloned into the NdeI and XhoI sites of the pET28a(+) vector or the pET21a(+) vector (Invitrogen), respectively (Table S1). All the plasmids containing CmADH genes were sequenced to verify sequence integrity (AuGCT, Beijing, China). The recombinant CmADH proteins overexpressed using the pET28a(+) vector were N-terminally His-tagged, and purified by affinity chromatography using a 5-ml nickel-charged HiTrap column (Pharmacia) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The purified proteins were concentrated to 5–8 mg/ml by ultrafiltration using Amicon Ultra-4 centrifuge filter unit (30 kDa cut-off, Millipore), characterized by SDS-PAGE and used for in vitro characterization of enzymatic properties. On the other hand, the recombinant CmADH proteins overexpressed using the pET21a(+) vector were not His-tagged, and cell extracts of the corresponding E. coli BL21(DE3) transformant were used for zymogram analysis. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford [41].

In vitro characterization of enzymatic properties of recombinant CmADHs

ADH activity was assayed as previously described [7] with a slight modification. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.3), 5 mM NAD, enzyme solution (1 to 50 µg of protein), and 100 mM ethanol, in a total volume of 1 ml. To determine cofactor preference, NADP (5 mM) was tested in ADH activity assays. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount to reduce 1 µmol of NAD or NADP per minute at 25°C. Specific ADH activity (U/mg) was expressed as units (U) per mg of protein. To measure kinetics of CmADHs with ethanol, acetaldehyde, NAD and NADH, the experiments were performed as previously described [42] except for using sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.5). The experimental data were analyzed using Enzyme Kinetics Module of SigmaPlot 2001 (Systat Software Inc.) to get affinity constant (Km) values. To determine the substrate specificities of CmADHs towards a variety of alcohol substrates, ADH activity was assayed in the oxidative direction in the presence of the alcohol substrate (at 100 mM) with NAD as cofactor.

Zymogram analysis

ADH activity was visualized by native PAGE [43] followed by active staining [27]. Crude extracts of C. maltosa were prepared by vortexing with glass beads as described previously [13] except for using 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) as the extraction buffer. Proteins were separated on a 3% (wt/vol) stacking gel and 10% (wt/vol) separating gel with a constant voltage of 100 V for 160 min at 4°C. The electrophoresis gels were then stained as previously described [27].

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Real-time PCR primers (Table S1) were designed based on the sequences around 500–600 bp of CmADH genes where they have high sequence diversity to confirm specific gene product formation. Actin1 gene was chosen as endogenous gene [44]. The amplicon lengths were all about 120 bp. Total RNA were extracted using TRIZOL® Reagent (Invitrogen). To avoid DNA contamination that would disturb the quantitative mRNA analysis, the RNA samples were treated with DNase I (TaKaRa) following the instructions of the kit. cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript™ III First Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) for real-time PCR. Real-time PCR was carried out with the ABI Prism® 7300 Sequence Detection System and the SYBR Green I fluorescent dye for DNA detection using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The data were analyzed using the 2ΔCT and the 2ΔΔCT method [45].

Supporting Information

Table S1

Primers used in this study. Nde I and Xho I restriction sites are underlined. *Primer set ADH2Aup/ADH2Bdn was used to clone the DNA fragment containing CmADH2A and CmADH2B from the reference strains C. maltosa ATCC 28140 and AS 2.1386.

(0.06 MB DOC)

Table S2

Cofactor preference of CmADH1, CmADH2A and CmADH2B. Shown are mean and S.E. (n = 3).

(0.04 MB DOC)

Figure S1

The cloning strategy of C. maltosa ADH genes. Firstly, a 2565-bp DNA fragment containing the upstream sequence and the 5′ coding region of CmADH1 and a 737-bp DNA fragment harboring partial sequence of CmADH2 were amplified with degenerate primers ADH1-3/ADH1-4 and P1/P2 (Table S1) and sequenced (AuGCT, China), respectively. ADH1-3 was designed based on the sequence of GPI10 gene upstream ADH1 both in C. albicans and C. tropicalis, which encodes an integral membrane protein involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor synthesis. And ADH1-4 was prepared in highly conserved regions of C. albicans ADH1 and C. tropicalis ADH1. PCR primers P1 and P2 were designed according to C. albicans ADH2. Then, the remaining upstream and downstream sequences were obtained through several cassette-mediated PCRs using TaKaRa LA PCR™ in vitro Cloning Kit (TaKaRa), a PCR-based DNA walking method. The restriction endonucleases and genome-specific primers (Table S1) used were indicated on the top of each DNA fragment. Finally, the overlapping DNA fragments were assembled into the complete DNA fragment. The sequences of the coding regions and the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of CmADH1 and CmADH2A-CmADH2B have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers GU395490 and GU395491, respectively.

(5.06 MB TIF)

Figure S2

Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of CmADHs with those of other yeast ADHs. Numbering of amino acid corresponds to ScADH1. Residues that are involved in catalyses, are headed by letters: a, adenine binding pocket; r, adenosine ribose binding; p, pyrophosphate binding; n, binding of nicotinamide or nicotinamide ribose; s, substrate binding pocket; b, poton relay system; z, ligands of the active site zinc atom or ligands of the structural zinc atom. m, five more strictly conserved residues among the microbial ADHs. Asterisks indicate conserved amino acid residues, eight glycine residues and one valine of ADHs from divergent sources. Box I, mitochondrial targeting region; Box II, zinc-binding consensus; Box III, NAD(P)-binding motif. Reversed letters indicate the residues involved in cofactor binding, substrate binding or catalysis which are not conserved in three CmADHs and ScADH1. Accession numbers (from CaADH1 to SpADH1): X81694, XM_712556, AF008245, AF008244, V01292, Z49212, AY692988, XM_456023, X64397, X62766, X62767, AL032681.

(2.49 MB TIF)

Figure S3

Genomic contexts of ADH1 (A) or ADH2 (B) homologs from species of the CTG clade are drawn according to their genomic sequences. Species names and gene identifiers are shown in each box. Orthologous gene boxes are represented in the same color. Arrows indicate directions of gene transcription and are not to scale. Connectors join nearby genes: a solid bar for adjacent genes, two gray bars for loci less than five genes apart and one gray bar for loci <20 genes apart. Genomic contexts in square brackets are conversed compared with C. maltosa. The species of the CTG clade exhibited highly conserved gene order around ADH1. In case of ADH2 region, C. maltosa had the same genomic context as C. tropicalis except that another ADH existed in C. maltosa, and the other species of the CTG clade had transketolase gene TKL1 instead of squalene epoxidase gene ERG1. In general, two ADH genes, ADH1 and ADH2, existed in all the species of the CTG clade except for Pichia (Candida) guilliermondii in this study, although the ADH loci were dispersed in Candida parapsilosis and Lodderomyces elongisporus.

(1.34 MB TIF)

Figure S4

Characterization of ADH-deficient strain of C. maltosa by zymogram analysis. Cells were grown in YP medium containing 20 g/l glucose and harvested in the mid-exponential phase for zymogram analysis. Lane 1, wild-type strain Xu316. Lane 2–7, ADH-deficient mutants M3-360, M3-400, M1-400, M11-400, M12-400 and M15-400.

(0.22 MB TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Patrick Shuler of Power, Environment and Energy Research Institute, California, USA for his critical review and suggestions. We also thank Dr. Changying Guo and Dr. Hua Yan for their kind suggestions to our experiments.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, 2006AA020101), the National Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-G-064, KSCX1-YW-11C3 and KSCX1-YW-11E) and the National Basic Research Program (973 Program, 2007CB707803). Q.W. is supported by the Bairenjihhua Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Wiesenfeld M, Schimpfessel L, Crokaert R. Multiple forms of mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975;405:500–512. [PubMed]
2. Reid MF, Fewson CA. Molecular characterization of microbial alcohol dehydrogenases. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1994;20:13–56. [PubMed]
3. Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. The primary structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene for alcohol dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:3018–3025. [PubMed]
4. Denis CL, Ferguson J, Young ET. mRNA levels for the fermentative alcohol dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae decrease upon growth on a nonfermentable carbon source. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:1165–1171. [PubMed]
5. Denis CL, Ciriacy M, Young ET. A positive regulatory gene is required for accumulation of the functional messenger RNA for the glucose-repressible alcohol dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1981;148:355–368. [PubMed]
6. Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, De Kee DW, Li T, et al. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat Genet. 2005;37:630–635. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Cho JY, Jeffries TW. Pichia stipitis genes for alcohol dehydrogenase with fermentative and respiratory functions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:1350–1358. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Cho JY, Jeffries TW. Transcriptional control of ADH genes in the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:2363–2368. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Jeffries TW. Utilization of xylose by bacteria, yeasts, and fungi. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1983;27:1–32. [PubMed]
10. Bruinenberg PM, Debot PHM, Vandijken JP, Scheffers WA. NADH-linked aldose reductase: the key to anaerobic alcoholic fermentation of xylose by yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1984;19:256–260.
11. Amore R, Kotter P, Kuster C, Ciriacy M, Hollenberg CP. Cloning and expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the NAD(P)H-dependent xylose reductase-encoding gene (XYL1) from the xylose-assimilating yeast Pichia stipitis. Gene. 1991;109:89–97. [PubMed]
12. Granstrom TB, Izumori K, Leisola M. A rare sugar xylitol. Part I: the biochemistry and biosynthesis of xylitol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:277–281. [PubMed]
13. Guo C, Zhao C, He P, Lu D, Shen A, et al. Screening and characterization of yeasts for xylitol production. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;101:1096–1104. [PubMed]
14. Bertram G, Swoboda RK, Gooday GW, Gow NA, Brown AJ. Structure and regulation of the Candida albicans ADH1 gene encoding an immunogenic alcohol dehydrogenase. Yeast. 1996;12:115–127. [PubMed]
15. Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MA, Sakthikumar S, et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature. 2009;459:657–662. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Pilgrim D, Young ET. Primary structure requirements for correct sorting of the yeast mitochondrial protein ADH III to the yeast mitochondrial matrix space. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:294–304. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17. Saliola M, Gonnella R, Mazzoni C, Falcone C. Two genes encoding putative mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenases are present in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Yeast. 1991;7:391–400. [PubMed]
18. Shain DH, Salvadore C, Denis CL. Evolution of the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes in yeast: characterization of a fourth ADH in Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol Gen Genet. 1992;232:479–488. [PubMed]
19. Ciriacy M. Genetics of alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Two loci controlling synthesis of the glucose-repressible ADH II. Mol Gen Genet. 1975;138:157–164. [PubMed]
20. Lutstorf U, Megnet R. Multiple forms of alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Physiological control of ADH-2 and properties of ADH-2 and ADH-4. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;126:933–944. [PubMed]
21. Mazzoni C, Saliola M, Falcone C. Ethanol-induced and glucose-insensitive alcohol dehydrogenase activity in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:2279–2286. [PubMed]
22. Saliola M, Getuli C, Mazzoni C, Fantozzi I, Falcone C. A new regulatory element mediates ethanol repression of KlADH3, a Kluyveromyces lactis gene coding for a mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:693–701. [PubMed]
23. Kehrer JP, Biswal SS. The molecular effects of acrolein. Toxicol Sci. 2000;57:6–15. [PubMed]
24. Ciriacy M. Genetics of alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae .1. isolation and genetic analysis of adh mutants. Mutation Research. 1975;29:315–326.
25. Saliola M, De Maria I, Lodi T, Fiori A, Falcone C. KlADH3, a gene encoding a mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase, affects respiratory metabolism and cytochrome content in Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:1184–1192. [PubMed]
26. Mazzoni C, Iacchini S, Serafini A, Falcone C. Characterization of a Kluyveromyces lactis mutant with altered regulation of mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenases. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:421–427. [PubMed]
27. Indrati R, Naito J, Ohta Y. Coenzyme dependent alcohol dehydrogenases in Candida guilliermondii Y4. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 1991;37:803–807.
28. Ansell R, Granath K, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Adler L. The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD(+)-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. Embo Journal. 1997;16:2179–2187. [PubMed]
29. Gonzalez-Duarte R, Albalat R. Merging protein, gene and genomic data: the evolution of the MDR-ADH family. Heredity. 2005;95:184–197. [PubMed]
30. Bozzi A, Saliola M, Falcone C, Bossa F, Martini F. Structural and biochemical studies of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes from Kluyveromyces lactis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1997;1339:133–142. [PubMed]
31. Park YC, Yun NR, San KY, Bennett GN. Molecular cloning and characterization of the alcohol dehydrogenase ADH1 gene of Candida utilis ATCC 9950. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33:1032–1036. [PubMed]
32. Eklund H, Muller-Wille P, Horjales E, Futer O, Holmquist B, et al. Comparison of three classes of human liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Emphasis on different substrate binding pockets. Eur J Biochem. 1990;193:303–310. [PubMed]
33. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, Merico A, Compagno C. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends in Genetics. 2006;22:183–186. [PubMed]
34. Fredlund E, Beerlage C, Melin P, Schnurer J, Passoth V. Oxygen and carbon source-regulated expression of PDC and ADH genes in the respiratory yeast Pichia anomala. Yeast. 2006;23:1137–1149. [PubMed]
35. Smith MG, Des Etages SG, Snyder M. Microbial synergy via an ethanol-triggered pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:3874–3884. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Sauer U. Molecular basis for anaerobic growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on xylose, investigated by global gene expression and metabolic flux analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:2307–2317. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Ihmels J, Bergmann S, Gerami-Nejad M, Yanai I, McClellan M, et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science. 2005;309:938–940. [PubMed]
38. Passoth V, Zimmermann M, Klinner U. Peculiarities of the regulation of fermentation and respiration in the crabtree-negative, xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1996;57–58:201–212. [PubMed]
39. Passoth V, Cohn M, Schafer B, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Klinner U. Analysis of the hypoxia-induced ADH2 promoter of the respiratory yeast Pichia stipitis reveals a new mechanism for sensing of oxygen limitation in yeast. Yeast. 2003;20:39–51. [PubMed]
40. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
41. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. [PubMed]
42. Brisdelli F, Saliola M, Pascarella S, Luzi C, Franceschini N, et al. Kinetic properties of native and mutagenized isoforms of mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase III purified from Kluyveromyces lactis. Biochimie. 2004;86:705–712. [PubMed]
43. Williamson VM, Bennetzen J, Young ET, Nasmyth K, Hall BD. Isolation of the structural gene for alcohol dehydrogenase by genetic complementation in yeast. Nature. 1980;283:214–216. [PubMed]
44. Daniel HM, Sorrell TC, Meyer W. Partial sequence analysis of the actin gene and its potential for studying the phylogeny of Candida species and their teleomorphs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:1593–1606. [PubMed]
45. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. [PubMed]
46. Fitzpatrick DA, Logue ME, Stajich JE, Butler G. A fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis. BMC Evol Biol. 2006;6:99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Gordon JL, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. Additions, losses, and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000485. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science