PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of kjoThis ArticleKorean Journal of OphthalmologyAims and ScopeInstructions to AuthorsE-submission
 
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006 December; 20(4): 225–229.
Published online 2006 December 31. doi:  10.3341/kjo.2006.20.4.225
PMCID: PMC2908856

The Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Measurements in Glaucoma

Yun Suk Chung, MD1,2 and Yong Ho Sohn, MDcorresponding author2

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) in measuring peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in glaucomatous eyes.

Methods

Fifty glaucomatous eyes were evaluated in this study. Evaluations were analyzed two ways. First, parameters of the Stratus OCT (average thickness, superior/inferior average) and GDx VCC (TSNIT average, nerve fiber indicator (NFI), superior/inferior average) were correlated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). Secondly, comparison (r) of these parameters was completed using the mean deviation (MD) of visual field defect.

Results

The following parameters were found to be significantly correlated (P<0.005). TSNIT average/average thickness (r=0.673), NFI/average thickness (r=-0.742), superior average (r=0.841), and inferior average (r=0.736). In the correlation analysis using the severity of visual field defect, all these parameters had statistically meaningful correlations (P<0.005).

Conclusions

GDx VCC and Stratus OCT are highly correlated in glaucomatous eyes. Therefore, peripapillary RNFL thickness measured by Stratus OCT and GDx VCC may be equally helpful in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Keywords: GDx VCC, Glaucoma, OCT, Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

Glaucoma is optic neuropathy with the loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and their axons.1,2 The loss of RGC axons may be structurally apparent as a localized and/or diffused thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL).2-5 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) are two imaging technologies designed to measure peripapillary RNFL thickness. With OCT (Stratus OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA), scanning interferometry is used to obtain a cross section of the retina based on the reflectivity of the different layers of the retina.6-8 A high reflectance layer located just under the inner surface of the retina corresponding to the RNFL is measured with a computer algorithm to determine RNFL thickness.8 The GDx VCC (Laser Diagnostic Technology, San Diego, California, USA) , the latest version of SLP, is equipped with a variable corneal compensator and estimates the thickness of the RNFL by measuring the summed retardation of a polarized scanning laser beam, induced by form-birefringent microtubules supporting the RGC axons.9-11 Despite previous studies' demonstration of relatively high diagnostic accuracy in detection of glaucoma with OCT and GDx VCC,12-18 it is not known whether the measurements of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC have any correlation at all.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between Stratus OCT and GDx VCC peripapillary RNFL measurements in glaucoma. According to the severity of visual field defect, the relationship of these measurements will be evaluated.

Materials and Methods

Glaucomatous eyes of 50 different patients meeting the eligibility criteria were included in this prospective study. Eligibility criteria included reproducible glaucomatous visual field defect,19 and glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc regardless of intraocular pressure. A glaucomatous optic disc was defined as cup:disc asymmetry between the eyes that was greater than or equal to 0.2, rim thinning, notching, excavation, or RNFL defect. Informed consent was obtained from each subject. All patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination, including slit-lamp biomicroscopy (stereoscopic examination of optic disc), gonioscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, achromatic automated perimetry (Humphrey field analyzer [HFA]II, central 24-2 Full-Threshold strategy; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA), GDx VCC imaging, and Stratus OCT imaging. One eye of each subject was used for the study. If both of the patient's eyes met the eligibility criteria, one eye was randomly selected. According to the mean deviation (MD) of HFA, three arbitrary criteria of visual field defect were classified as early 「no worse than -6 decibel (dB)」, moderate (worse than -6 dB but no worse than -12 dB), and severe (worse than -12 dB).20 All subjects had visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Patients with any significant coexisting ocular disease, including posterior segment eye disease and corneal disease, or systemic diseases with possible ocular involvement, such as diabetes mellitus, were excluded.

OCT imaging (Stratus OCT, software 3.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) of the peripapillary RNFL was performed using three 360-degree circular high resolution scans with a diameter of 3.4 mm centered on the optic disc (Fast RNFL scan). The mean of the three RNFL thickness measurements was used for the study. The thickness of average and superior/inferior quadrants was obtained.

GDx VCC imaging (Laser Diagnostic Technology, San Diego, California, USA) was performed using a scan circle of 3.2 mm diameter centered on the optic disc, and the mean of three measurements was used. TSNIT average, nerve fiber indicator (NFI), and superior/inferior averages were obtained. For statistical analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) was calculated for each set of parameters, and P value of less than or equal to 0.005 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Fifty glaucomatous eyes of 50 patients were enrolled in this study (27 males, 23 females). Patient age range was 22±84 years of age with a mean age of 54.70±14.68 years. The study included 31 cases of normal tension glaucoma (NTG), 11 primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 5 secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) and 3 primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). All glaucomatous eyes had visual field loss of -10.04±6.66 dB mean deviation and 7.49±3.19 corrected pattern standard deviation (Table 1).

Table 1
Subject characteristics (n=50)

Measured parameters of peripapillary RNFL using GDX VCC were 42.37±5.62 µm TSNIT average, 50.72±18.66 nerve fiber indicator (NFI), 50.62±9.53 µm superior average, and 45.41±8.51 µm inferior average. Using the Stratus OCT, measured parameters were 74.18±13.32 µm average thickness, 89.50±20.10 µm superior average, and 82.50±22.56 µm inferior average (Table 2).

Table 2
Parameter measurements of GDx VCC and Stratus OCT

The relationships between GDx VCC and Stratus OCT parameters are graphically represented in Figs. 1, ,2,2, ,3,3, and and4.4. Statistically significant correlations were observed in each parameter (P<0.005). Pearson coefficients were as follows: 0.673 for TSNIT average/average thickness (Fig. 1), -0.742 for NFI/average thickness (Fig. 2), 0.841 for superior average (Fig. 3), and 0.736 for inferior average (Fig. 4). All parameters had positive correlations except for the NFI because NFI has a higher positive value in glaucoma.

Fig. 1
Scatterplot of TSNIT average versus average thickness.
Fig. 2
Scatterplot of NFI (Nerve fiber indicator) versus average thickness.
Fig. 3
Scatterplot of superior averages.
Fig. 4
Scatterplot of inferior averages.

Patients were divided into early, moderate, and severe glaucoma according to the severity of the visual field defect (Table 3). Early glaucoma (15 eyes) had -3.82±1.38 dB for MD whereas moderate glaucoma (20 eyes) had -8.81±1.96 dB and severe glaucoma (15 eyes) had -17.90±6.21 dB. Results of the relationship between GDx VCC and Stratus OCT in all three groups are presented in Tables 4, ,5,5, and and6.6. GDx VCC and Stratus OCT remained significantly correlated with each other in each glaucoma group (P<0.005).

Table 3
Subcriteria of patients according to the visual field defect
Table 4
Relationship of GDx VCC and OCT in early glaucoma
Table 5
Relationship of GDx VCC and OCT in moderate glaucoma
Table 6
Relationship of GDx VCC and OCT in severe glaucoma

Discussion

Previous histomorphometric assessments of peripapillary RNFL thickness in human eyes give mean thicknesses of 215 and 367 µm.21,22 There are currently two different imaging modalities designed to analyze peripapillary RNFL thickness, and the Stratus OCT and GDx VCC are the two latest commercially available models. Many studies have found relatively high diagnostic accuracy in glaucoma detection with GDx VCC and OCT.12-18 The use of these devices has been especially helpful in the documentation of glaucomatous changes and could potentially aid in the clinical management of glaucoma.

Previously, most studies concentrated on either GDx VCC or OCT, and only a few studies actually compared GDx VCC versus OCT in glaucoma. Greaney et al.23 compared OCT1 with the GDx fixed corneal compensator (earlier version of SLP) for the discrimination of glaucoma. The study found that OCT1 measurements of RNFL thickness were significantly inferior to GDx RNFL thickness in the discrimination of glaucoma, whereas a combination of these imaging methods significantly improved discriminability. Bagga et al.24 demonstrated that GDx VCC had a high correlation with visual function and RNFL thickness as assessed by OCT1. Recently, Leung et al.25 reported that the total average RNFL thickness measured with Stratus OCT and GDx VCC were highly correlated (r=0.852) and that measurements of Stratus OCT and GDx VCC RNFL were significantly correlated.

Our study showed that parameters of GDx VCC and Stratus OCT were significantly correlated with each other. Correlation coefficients (r) were 0.673 for TSNIT average/average thickness, -0.742 for NFI/average thickness, 0.841 for superior average, and 0.736 for inferior average. Notably, higher correlations were observed in NFI/average thickness and superior average. The NFI, which is a global measure of focal and diffused retinal nerve fiber layer loss using neural networks, discriminated well between normal and glaucoma among parameters.26 Kanamori et al.27 found that the average thickness in OCT parameters had the strongest correlation with the visual field defect. The strongest correlation was between NFI and average thickness, which might be meaningful. Because the nasal and temporal quadrants have been reported to have higher variability in the OCT and SLP RNFL measurements,28-31 we exclude them in this study.

Sixty percent of patients with ocular hypertension had evidence of retinal nerve fiber layer loss occurring up to six years before a detectable change in standard automated perimetry.32 Reus and Lemij33 reported patients with mild to moderate visual field loss in glaucoma may be better monitored with GDx VCC and patients who have severe visual field loss in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry. We wanted to examine the relationship between GDx VCC and Stratus OCT in eyes with early, moderate, and severe glaucomatous visual field defects. In this study, the correlation between GDx VCC and Stratus OCT was statistically significant in all three visual field defect groups. However, we could not find well-ordered relationships with respect to the amount of visual field defect. In the NFI/average thickness comparison, correlations were strongest in eyes with severe field defects (r=-0.829) rather than early (r=-0.658) or moderate (r=-0.741) field defects. Superior and inferior comparisons had very high correlations (r=0.855, 0.870 respectively) in early glaucomatous field defect.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the measurements of GDx VCC and Stratus OCT are strongly correlated with each other in perimetric glaucoma, and that this relationship remains, regardless of the degree of glaucomatous visual field defect. In further study, correlations should be examined in preperimetric glaucoma.

Footnotes

This study was presented at the 93rd annual meeting of the Korean Ophthalmological Society, April, 2005

References

1. Kerrgan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741–748. [PubMed]
2. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135–146. [PubMed]
3. Jonas JB, Schiro D. Localized wedge shaped defect of the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:285–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ. Initial glaucomatous optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer abnormalities and their progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:485–490. [PubMed]
5. Quigley HA, Miller NR, George T. Clinical evaluation of nerve fiber layer atrophy as an indicator of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:1564–1571. [PubMed]
6. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178–1181. [PubMed]
7. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, et al. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1584–1589. [PubMed]
8. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:586–596. [PubMed]
9. Huang XR, Knighton RW. Linear birefringence of the retinal nerve fiber layer measured in vitro with a multispectral imaging micropolarimeter. J Biomed Opt. 2002;7:199–204. [PubMed]
10. Dreher AW, Bailey ED. Assessment of the retinal nerve fiber layer by scanning-laser polarimetry. SPIE. 1993;1877:266–271.
11. Weinreb RN, Dreher AW, Coleman A, et al. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:557–560. [PubMed]
12. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fiber layer in perimetrically unaffected eyes of glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2199–2203. [PubMed]
13. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowed C, et al. Fourier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry measurements with variable corneal compensation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2606–2612. [PubMed]
14. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowed C, et al. Comparison of scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:698–704. [PubMed]
15. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowed C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomopraphy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44–55. [PubMed]
16. Budenz DL, Michael A, Chang RT, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Stratus OCT for perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:3–9. [PubMed]
17. Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, Wang J, et al. Comparison of three optic coherence tomography scanning areas for detection of glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:39–43. [PubMed]
18. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1860–1865. [PubMed]
19. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992. pp. 53–59.
20. Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson DR. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. pp. 52–63.
21. Dichtl A, Jonas JB, Naumann GO. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:474–479. [PubMed]
22. Varma R, Skaf M, Barron E. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:2114–2119. [PubMed]
23. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140–145. [PubMed]
24. Bagga H, Greenfield DS, Feuer W, et al. Scanning Laser Polarimetry With Variable Corneal Compensation and Optical Coherence Tomography in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:521–529. [PubMed]
25. Leung CK, Chan W, Chong KKL, et al. Comparative Study of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, I: Correlation Analysis in Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3214–3220. [PubMed]
26. Colen TP, Tang NEML, Mulder PGH, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of New GDx Parameters. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:28–33. [PubMed]
27. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MFT, et al. Evaluation of the Glaucomatous Damage on Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Optical Coherence Tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:513–520. [PubMed]
28. Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2278–2282. [PubMed]
29. Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Zuppardi E, et al. Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:190–195. [PubMed]
30. Kook MS, Sung K, Park RH, et al. Reproducibility of scanning laser polarimetry (GDx) of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;239:118–121. [PubMed]
31. Hoh ST, Ishikawa TC, Greenfield DS, et al. Peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:12–15. [PubMed]
32. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber layer atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:77–83. [PubMed]
33. Reus NJ, Nemij HG. The relationship between standard automated perimetry and GDx VCC measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:840–845. [PubMed]

Articles from Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO are provided here courtesy of The Korean Ophthalmological Society