|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
To assess current medical staffing levels within the Hospital Referral System in the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa, and analyze the surge capacity needs to prepare for the potential of a conventional mass casualty incident during a planned mass gathering.
Query of all available medical databases of both state employees and private medical personnel within the greater Cape Town area to determine current staffing levels and distribution of personnel across public and private domains. Analysis of the adequacy of available staff to manage a mass casualty incident.
There are 594 advanced pre-hospital personnel in Cape Town (17/100,000 population) and 142 basic pre-hospital personnel (4.6/100,000). The total number of hospital and clinic-based medical practitioners is 3097 (88.6/100,000), consisting of 1914 general physicians; 54.7/100,000 and 1183 specialist physicians; 33.8/100,000. Vacancy rates for all medical practitioners range from 23.5% to 25.5%. This includes: nursing post vacancies (26%), basic emergency care practitioners (39.3%), advanced emergency care personnel (66.8%), pharmacy assistants (42.6%), and pharmacists (33.1%).
There are sufficient numbers and types of personnel to provide the expected ordinary healthcare needs at mass gathering sites in Cape Town; however, qualified staff are likely insufficient to manage a concurrent mass casualty event. Considering that adequate correctly skilled and trained staff form the backbone of disaster surge capacity, it appears that Cape Town is currently under resourced to manage a mass casualty event. With the increasing size and frequency of mass gathering events worldwide, adequate disaster surge capacity is an issue of global relevance.
Crowds are becoming larger, allowing for a greater impact after major and minor events alike. In addition, healthcare systems suffer from daily crowding and lack capacity for even small increases in volume and types of patients.1,2
Cape Town is a host city for nine soccer matches as part of the FIFA World Cup™ 2010, a sporting event founded in 1930. It is second only to the Olympic Games in numbers of participants and visitors, including 32 international football teams.3
Historically Cape Town has hosted large one-time events such as the 1995 Rugby World Cup, the 1996 African Cup of Nations and the 2003 Cricket World Cup. In excess of 450,000 football-specific overseas visitors are expected in South Africa for the World Cup, in addition to the regular 300,000 tourists.4 An excess of 150,000 visitors are projected to be in Cape Town alone. The Western Cape region is thus uniquely poised to test its disaster preparedness and the special challenges that large, culturally diverse, multi-lingual international crowds demand.
Standard medical needs for crowds at mass gatherings are well understood and can be met with available resources when properly coordinated. Depending on the type, location, duration and time of day of the event, as well as weather characteristics5, the highest predicted patient presentation rates (PPR) are projected to be 2.6 to 3.3 patients/1,000 participants.1,7,8 Studies indicate that the transport to hospital rate (TTHR) ranges from 0.01 to 0.55/1,000 patients.1
The potential for a planned mass gathering escalating to a mass casualty incident (MCI), raises the following question: Does Cape Town have adequate resources to meet ordinary patient care needs the increased requirements linked to mass gatherings expected in June 2010 for the Football World Cup, but also for a large casualty-producing incident should it occur?
Most disaster planning is performed at institutional or organizational levels with little collaboration between organizations, especially public and private providers. Specific objectives of this study are to assess the combined current medical staffing levels within the Hospital Referral System in the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa, within both private and state healthcare sectors, as a basis for determining whether current resources are adequate to manage a conventional mass casualty incident.
Using Pivot tables in Microsoft® Excel, investigators queried all available medical databases of state employees and private medical personnel within the greater Cape Town area to determine current staffing levels and distribution of personnel across public and private domains. The Human Resource, Personnel and Salary (PERSAL) system is used by the Provincial Government of the Western Cape to register and pay employees.9 It allows for data retrieval on salaried state-employed staff by institution and category, as well as salary level. Part-time and seasonal employees were excluded, while Department of Health contract and permanent workers were included. Qualifications are only recorded for about 10% of all employees.
The database was extracted from the PERSAL system on October 15, 2008. Analysis revealed 48 categories of staff, with similar functions grouped under the same heading. Pharmacists of all types were grouped in one category, while pharmacy assistants were categorized separately due to need for supervision.
Two additional sources were examined to determine the ancillary services within the state and medical personnel in private services. The Risk Management Division of the Provincial Government of the Western Cape was used to determine the number of outsourced security personnel available in healthcare facilities during both day and night shifts. We used the MEDpages database to obtain data on private practitioners, combined with locum agencies in Cape Town. This study was approved by the local institutional review committee.
Personnel in Cape Town available for first response and patient transport during a disaster are 17/100,000 population emergency care practitioners and 4.6/100,000 pre-hospital providers (Table 1). The overall number of medical personnel currently available is 88.6/100,000 population. This number excludes interns, as they are regarded as still being in training, and aggregates all other medical practitioners except psychiatrists. Of the total, general practitioners represent 54.7/100,000 population, incorporating all medical practitioners who are not registered as specialists in a surgical discipline or who are able to provide healthcare during a disaster. By definition, this group includes physicians with varying expertise, capable of providing non-surgical assistance ranging from triage and basic healthcare/first aid to more advanced medical stabilization and interventions.
The number of registered specialists is 33.8/100,000 population. This number includes registrars (senior residents), and aggregates all medical and surgical specialists, excluding psychiatrists, dermatologists and dentists, as well as those specialists “boarding” on non-specialist posts who hold an equivalent registration.
Vacancy rates for healthcare providers are available only for the public sector. For all medical practitioners, irrespective of qualifications, these lie between 23.5% and 25.5%, equaling that of all nursing posts at 26% (Table 2).
All “specialist” registered nurses who have additional qualifications in intensive care, surgery and psychiatry, were grouped together. The number in total is 140/100,000 population for nurses. The relative number of staff and enrolled nurses is lower at 54.7/100,000 population and that of assistant nurses is 92.8/100,000 population.*1
The psychological support staff category includes social workers, registered counselors, psychologists and psychiatrists who provide immediate support including reuniting families. There are 775 private and 184 state employees (total 959), or 27.4/100,000 population.
Eighty-one percent of security services are outsourced. There are currently no “disaster clauses” in the contracts with security services or catering companies. No data are available these essential support personnel for private facilities.
Limited numbers of ventilated and non-ventilated (“high care”) beds exist in Cape Town (Table 3), which provides insight into the staffing needed per level of care.
Data extraction is a challenge in South Africa; there are no audits to verify the internal validity and completeness of the PERSAL dataset. A complete list of named individuals was available only for state institutions. In contrast, it was impossible to determine whether private healthcare workers were double counted, as the same detail was not available for this group. Furthermore, many of the data are not available in an easily usable format, or underlying competitiveness (private sector) or privacy and security concerns (public and private sector) limit access to data.
The data that are available are limited in scope, with only certain types of personnel necessary for a comprehensive disaster response. For example, staff performing essential services, such as cleaning, catering and laundry services, are not recorded in a database since these services have been largely outsourced.
“At the heart of each and every health system, the workforce is central in advancing health.”10 The issues facing the system in South Africa are common to many parts of the world. Healthcare systems are strained on a daily basis and disaster planning is relegated below more urgent needs. In addition, the misconception that surge capacity can be equated with “bed capacity” remains pervasive. In many cases, the normal patient volume will still present to clinics and hospitals despite a major disaster. A review of the case mix presenting to emergency departments (ED) in Cape Town showed that the majority of patients self-presented11 and would therefore not readily be diverted elsewhere during a disaster.
The latest census (February 2007), of Cape Town showed a population of 3.497 million12, with an annual national growth rate of 0.8%.13 Compared to 2001, the Western Cape showed a 16.7% increase, vs. a national average of 8.26% increase for the same time period.14 Of the population of the Western Cape, 66.3% live within the City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality.15 This results in a disproportionate burden on service delivery, including infrastructure, social services and in particular healthcare delivery.
The South African health system is dichotomous, with a private healthcare system that is among the best in the world16 and a state system that is facing infrastructure, personnel and supply chain challenges that result in poorer health outcomes. More than 80% of the population relies on state medical care; private hospitals have capacity for less than 14% of the population.17
During the first ever analysis of the world’s health systems in 2000, the WHO ranked South Africa 175th of 190 member countries.18 According to the latest available annual UN Human Development Report, South Africa ranks 121st internationally in resources, access and commitment to health services.19 This is due to low life expectancies from pulmonary tuberculosis, HIV, and a high per-capita expenditure on health with lower than expected outcomes. The Years of Life lost in the Western Cape for HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis combined represent 22% of overall mortality, as the first and third leading causes respectively.20
This disproportionate spending also drives approximately 73% of general practitioners and 75% of specialists to work in the private sector, while only 41% of the nursing staff do.21 As most of these physicians are in solo or small group practice, they are generally not connected with disaster planning.
In addition, these practitioners often work in more than one institution or have more than one practice. As is common in disaster planning where the same personnel tend to have multiple obligations, an institution might overestimate the number of medical staff available to it, should a mass casualty incident involve more than one healthcare institution or area.22
Every health system faces variable demand on its resources. In addition to a long-term increase in patient volume, there may be short-term increases in demand for emergency healthcare services, or “surge.”1 When the primary healthcare and outpatient systems are not functioning effectively, the EDs become the destination for patients who have no other access to primary healthcare.2
A number of actions can be taken to manage a catastrophic surge. These include discharging stable ED and inpatients, cancelling elective surgeries, opening alternate care areas, and calling in standby or off-duty staff. For such a system to work effectively, a clear plan must define who has authority to initiate such a cascade. In addition, the trigger points that activate these costly measures should be specified. The activation of a local or regional disaster plan may have residual health service delivery implications for days or longer. These measures, however, have not been rigorously investigated or consistently implemented in all patient populations. Hospital beds and staff are already routinely saturated to care for the sickest patients. Therefore, there are no additional staff to mobilize.
During catastrophic surges, authorities often rely on the assistance of the national armed forces, whether as part of the search and rescue phases, or by providing logistical support or medical care. The UEFA EURO 2008™ football cup illustrated the pre-emptive use of the armed forces to provide security and medical staff.23 While legislative authority exists, this option is not feasible in South Africa, 24 despite having two large military medical facilities (2-MIL and IMM), in part due to personnel shortages.25,26 South Africa also lacks a federally organized civil protection organization that could provide the framework for such a response.
Despite no scientifically-proven norms, a number of countries have attempted to define which parameters would allow for adequate disaster surge: the U.S. government, originally through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and subsequently via the Department of Homeland Security, has planning scenarios for 500 beds/million population for patients with symptoms of acute infectious diseases, while 50 beds/million is thought to be adequate for non-infectious diseases and injuries.27
The U.S. National Disaster Medical System projections range from 100 – 600 patients/million population for traumatic disasters. The Israeli military defines adequate surge capacity during peacetime for an unspecified threat as being able to augment patient care capacity, including staffed beds in existing hospitals, by 20%.28 It is unclear whether these extrapolations can be applied to the system in South Africa.
Healthcare worker absentee rates can severely disable disaster response. One survey predicted absentee rates of 14% in the case of a mass casualty incident, which increased to 40 – 50% in an infectious disease outbreak.29,30 Fear and concern for family (almost half of the respondents) and fear and concern for self (almost one-third of respondents) were the most frequently cited reasons for being unwilling to report to work in one large U.S. study,30 factors echoed in a Canadian study.31 These are, however, theoretical rates, as these studies do not account for actual behavior during a disaster. Pre-event education and provision of care sites for families and pets may substantially improve response rates.
South Africa already has a pronounced lack of medical practitioners 32 (77 physicians per 100,000, as compared to 256 in the U.S. and 328 in Sweden).33 This has now been institutionalized by making the District Health System nurseled. However, there is lack of sufficient numbers of trained nurses. The more affluent provinces of Gauteng and Western Cape are at a slight advantage with the latter having 147 doctors/100,000. The majority of these (60%) work in the private sector. This implies that only 31 doctors/100,000 permanently work in the public sector in this province (i.e., excluding seasonal doctors).34
Only seven state hospitals (limited 24-hour operating room capacity) and nine community health centers (no operating room capacity) have EDs equipped and staffed to manage trauma patients. These centers are usually staffed by the most inexperienced personnel (community service medical officers) and there is no immediate access to senior clinicians.32,34,35 This is due to a flattening of the pyramid of expertise, whereby a large number of junior personnel function at primary and regional levels and faculty are concentrated at academic centers. In addition, many posts are vacant, some having been frozen or abolished.
Calling in off-duty personnel has limited benefit, as the entire workforce will be subsequently exhausted in the first 24 hours. In a non-chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) sudden-onset, defined-scene event, the initial event is static, and would usually not result in further casualties after 24 hours. However, in a dynamic or evolving event, it would impact the delivery of “normal” medical care if all available staff were used without respite.13
As compared to previously published figures suggesting that the Western Cape has the highest level of medical personnel resources, with 147 doctors/100,000 34, the findings of this study of a combined public/private medical practitioner number of 83.7/100,000 seems low. However, the published figure from 2004 is based on simple analysis of the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCA) database, which includes every paid member on the register who lists a residential address in the Western Cape.
Many doctors working overseas maintain their HPCSA registration using addresses of their relatives, while not actually working in the province, or even in the country. In addition, in 2008, a further 12,000 members, including physicians, dentists, occupational therapists, psychologists, optometrists, and emergency care practitioners were removed from the register36, often because they no longer practice in South Africa. Thus, the data collected in this study represent a more accurate assessment of the true numbers of staff available for immediate disaster surge capacity than the previously published HPCSA registration numbers.
Between 1990 and 2000, 39% of all academic hospital professional staff were lost to the private sector and/or the health sector of other countries and the posts frozen.37 Compared to the last officially published figures by the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, the total number of medical personnel in 2006/2007 is listed as 2108, much higher than the current 1850 (which includes 310 medical interns). This represents a decrease of 12.2% over one year.38
Another important consideration is that between 14% and 50% of primary healthcare workers (exclusive of support personnel) may not report for duty during a disaster, as determined in two large-scale surveys conducted in 2004 in the wake of the SARS epidemic.29,30 Also, most call-out cascades are not regularly updated. There is only a single large-scale multi-agency drill within the city required every two years and that focuses on an MCI response at Cape Town International Airport, as directed by International Civil Aviation Organization regulations.39
Nursing staff, also a critical resource in any healthcare system, is in short supply. With 5,623 nurses working within the state service, responsible for covering a four-shift system, this leaves about 1,406 nurses per shift to support a total of 1,246 level 1, 1,485 level 2 and 1,460 level 3 beds, including 128 intensive care unit beds (see below). Nursing staff remain the group with the highest shortage, a scenario that is expected to worsen over the next decade.40,41 Inter-hospital cooperation is hindered in part by fears that scarce nursing resources might be “poached.”
Despite a re-examination of the systems underlying disaster preparation worldwide following the U.S. World Trade Center attacks and hurricanes Katrina and Rita, many of the recommendations have not been integrated into practice. A snapshot review presented to the U.S. House of Representatives in May 2008, referring to an event such as the bombings in Madrid, Spain, on March 11, 2004,42 showed that none of the seven U.S. cities surveyed had sufficient capacity to manage the number of casualties that had sought care at a single hospital ED in Madrid in the first few hours following the terrorist bombings.43
Disaster modelers have proposed that up to 20% of a hospital’s capacity can be augmented in the event of a disaster, by actions such as discharging patients awaiting elective surgery and low-risk medical and surgical patients in both in- and outpatient settings and calling in off-duty staff.44 The U.S. congressional review stated that this assumption would not be viable in U.S. healthcare facilities43 that already suffer from severe crowding on a daily basis.
Similarities and dissimilarities exist in South Africa. There is a large indigent population as a result of a “quadruple burden of disease,” especially in the form of tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, leaving many patients with Karnofsky indices of less than 50%.45 When this is considered collectively with an already overburdened emergency transport system, it leads to discharged patients occupying acute in-patient beds while awaiting pick-up. These patients often need ongoing basic nursing care while awaiting skilled nursing facility or home-based nursing care.
The Gregorio Marañón University General Hospital in Madrid, an 1,800-bed facility, was only able to augment its bed capacity by 9% as a response to the influx of casualties following the 2004 bombings.42 A team that could initiate rapid discharges of stable patients, for example using the New York Rapid Discharge Tool, would facilitate a more efficient process.46 Such a team, able to coordinate a city-wide platform, is lacking in Cape Town. Additionally, real-time bed and personnel status data would not be available to itA U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analysis found that severely injured patients treated at hospitals with Level 1 trauma centers have a 25% lower risk of death than patients treated at a lower level or non-trauma center.47 While these data were not collected in the setting of a disaster, they may suggest that a Level 1 trauma unit would be the preferred destination for wounded in the event of a mass casualty incident involving trauma. There are only two adult Level 1 trauma units and one pediatric Level 1 unit in Cape Town.
Fewer data exist for other capacity indicators like unoccupied intensive care unit (ICU) beds. Due to nursing shortages,48 it is unclear what percentage of the 128 ICU beds in the state are truly functional. To augment capacity, nurse:patient ratios may be shifted from 1:1 to 1:2.
A range of further audits is required to fully assess disaster readiness in the Cape Town Metropole. These should include:
Prevention and mitigation are cost-effective for disaster management. A hazard-vulnerability-analysis predicts that an MCI is a real possibility during a planned mass gathering such as the FIFA World Cup™ 2010. Pre-event systems that include practitioner identification, credentialing, agreements with individual practices, as well as large hospital groups, must be actively addressed in conjunction with strategies for improving long-term healthcare worker training, recruitment and retention.
Staff are sufficient to manage the expected ordinary healthcare needs at mass gathering sites in Cape Town, and medical resources have been planned based on a modified response matrix (South African Medical Resource Model)49 modeled largely on the medical responses historically required at other large sporting events, in the United Kingdom and South Africa. However, deliberate planning for staffing to meet the needs of a mass casualty event has been lacking. The results of this database analysis suggest that Cape Town is currently understaffed for a mass casualty incident.
This research was performed as a part of the thesis for the European Master in Disaster Medicine (EMDM). The author is indebted to his Supervisors, Prof Koenig and Prof Bey, who are faculty at the EMDM, as well as Drs E and T Visser for their assistance in this report. The author of this report, being an employee of the Provincial Government of the Western Cape, is responsible for its content. No statement in the report should be construed as an official position of the Provincial Government of the Western Cape.
|Surge Capacity1||Staff||(trained personnel),|
|Stuff||(equipment and supplies),|
|Structure||(existing physical healthcare facilities or alternate care sites for patients coupled with incident management structure or organizational arrangement)|
|Systems*||(organizational arrangement to coordinate incident management components, and to guide with appropriate policies and procedures)|
|*The 3S Surge System Model consists of “Staff, Stuff, & Structure”|
|Patient Care Capacity2||full spectrum of staff, stuff and structure, the components of surge capacity described above|
|Daily Surge3||Term that has been challenged, but sometimes used to describe fluctuations in patient care demands in a non-disaster situation; can be modeled and is generally predictable|
Reprints available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem
Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias.
*What is termed “nursing sister” in South Africa refers to the only category of nursing staff that has gone to college and obtained a four-year degree. All the other categories of nursing staff undergo variable amounts of training, ranging from a home-based carrer who only receives a three month basic nursing care training course, to nursing assistant (one year), to staff and enrolled nurses (two years of training but via different routes - one via full-time training, one via on-the-job training with off-site teaching sessions and minor differences in scope of practice. This means that the numbers of “non-sisters” seem high but the competency and training levels are quite variable.