PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
 
PLoS One. 2010; 5(7): e11707.
Published online 2010 July 22. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0011707
PMCID: PMC2908542

Sirtuin 3, a New Target of PGC-1α, Plays an Important Role in the Suppression of ROS and Mitochondrial Biogenesis

Sumitra Deb, Editor

Abstract

Background

Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) is one of the seven mammalian sirtuins, which are homologs of the yeast Sir2 gene. SIRT3 is the only sirtuin with a reported association with the human life span. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) plays important roles in adaptive thermogenesis, gluconeogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration. PGC-1α induces several key reactive oxygen species (ROS)-detoxifying enzymes, but the molecular mechanism underlying this is not well understood.

Results

Here we show that PGC-1α strongly stimulated mouse Sirt3 gene expression in muscle cells and hepatocytes. Knockdown of PGC-1α led to decreased Sirt3 gene expression. PGC-1α activated the mouse SIRT3 promoter, which was mediated by an estrogen-related receptor (ERR) binding element (ERRE) (−407/−399) mapped to the promoter region. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed that ERRα bound to the identified ERRE and PGC-1α co-localized with ERRα in the mSirt3 promoter. Knockdown of ERRα reduced the induction of Sirt3 by PGC-1α in C2C12 myotubes. Furthermore, Sirt3 was essential for PGC-1α-dependent induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes and several components of the respiratory chain, including glutathione peroxidase-1, superoxide dismutase 2, ATP synthase 5c, and cytochrome c. Overexpression of SIRT3 or PGC-1α in C2C12 myotubes decreased basal ROS level. In contrast, knockdown of mSIRT3 increased basal ROS level and blocked the inhibitory effect of PGC-1α on cellular ROS production. Finally, SIRT3 stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis, and SIRT3 knockdown decreased the stimulatory effect of PGC-1α on mitochondrial biogenesis in C2C12 myotubes.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that Sirt3 functions as a downstream target gene of PGC-1α and mediates the PGC-1α effects on cellular ROS production and mitochondrial biogenesis. Thus, SIRT3 integrates cellular energy metabolism and ROS generation. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of SIRT3 regulation and its physiological functions may provide a novel target for treating ROS-related disease.

Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) was originally identified as a cold-inducible transcriptional coactivator of PPARγ. Recent studies show that PGC-1α plays important roles in adaptive thermogenesis in skeletal muscle and brown fat, gluconeogenesis in liver, mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration in muscle cells, and heart development [1], [2]. Notably, PGC-1α potently induces the expression of genes implicated in energy homeostasis in almost every cell type through interacting directly with and coactivating known mitochondrial regulators, such as the estrogen related receptors (ERRs), PPARs, or nuclear respiratory factors (NRFs) [1], [2], [3], [4]. Overexpression of PGC-1α in skeletal muscle cells results in increased energy expenditure and mitochondrial biogenesis [5], [6]. PGC-1α is induced in mouse liver by fasting and regulates the expression of several key genes involved in gluconeogenesis, including phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and glucose-6-phosphatase [7], [8]. PGC-1α knockout mice exhibit multiple metabolic defects, such as obesity, neurodegeneration and cardiomyopathy [9], [10].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can react with DNA, proteins and lipids and play important roles in many physiological and pathophysiological conditions, such as diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and aging [11]. Although ROS are produced in multiple cell compartments, the majority of cellular ROS (approximately 90%) contribute to mitochondrial energy metabolism. The mitochondrial electron transport chain complex I and complex III are presumed to be major sites of ROS generation [11], where electrons escape the electron transport chain and react with molecular oxygen, leading to the generation of superoxide. There are two main ways in which ROS production is limited in vivo. The first is through the action of detoxifying enzymes, including glutathione peroxidase-1 (GPx1) and superoxide dismutases (SODs). The second is through the uncoupling proteins [12], [13]. Although PGC-1α stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and electron transport activity, it suppresses ROS production and protects neural cells from oxidative stressor-induced death through the induction of several key ROS-detoxifying enzymes. PGC-1α null mice are more sensitive to the neurodegenerative effects of oxidative stress [14].

ERRs are a family of orphan nuclear hormone receptors consisting of ERRα, ERRβ, and ERRγ [15]. The ERRs share high sequence similarity to the estrogen receptor [16]. ERRα is expressed in various tissues and participates in metabolic regulation. ERRα null mice are resistant to obesity induced by a high-fat diet and exhibit reduced lipogenesis in their adipose tissue [17]. ERRα not only is a downstream target of PGC-1α but also is coactivated by this transcriptional coactivator. Consistent with the ability of PGC-1α to induce ERRα activity and expression, these proteins both control broad aspects of mitochondrial biology, including mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative respiration [18], [19], [20].

Sirt3 is a member of the class III histone deacetylases, also referred to as sirtuins (SIRTs). The SIRTs are a conserved family of proteins possessing NAD+-dependent deacetylase activity, distinct from class I and II histone deacetylases. SIRTs also possess ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. SIRTs have been demonstrated to play important roles in many physiological and pathophysiological conditions, including metabolism, cell survival, cancer, aging and calorie restriction-mediated longevity of organisms ranging from yeasts to humans [21], [22]. Acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (AceCS2), a mitochondrial enzyme that converts acetate into acetyl-CoA, was the first mitochondrial substrate of SIRT3 identified [23], [24]. Deacetylation of AceCS2 at lysine 642 by SIRT3 activates acetyl-CoA synthetase activity, providing increased acetyl-CoA to feed into the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and a component of complex I named NDUFA9, both mitochondrial proteins involved in energy production, are deacetylated by SIRT3 [25], [26]. Ku70 and forkhead transcription factor Foxo3a are also substrates of SIRT3 [27], [28], [29]. Sirt3-deficient animals exhibit striking mitochondrial protein hyperacetylation, suggesting that SIRT3 is a major mitochondrial deacetylase [25]. Remarkably, the basal levels of ATP in the heart, kidney and liver of SIRT3 null mice are reduced more than 50%, suggesting SIRT3 plays a role in regulating energy homeostasis in vivo [26]. In addition, variability in the human SIRT3 (hSIRT3) gene was reported to be linked to human longevity [30], [31].

Human SIRT3 is a mitochondrial protein, and its N-terminal 25 amino acid residues are responsible for its mitochondrial localization [32], [33]. Human SIRT3 is synthesized as an inactive protein and is activated by matrix peptidase [33]. However, mouse Sirt3 (mSirt3) was initially reported to encode a 257 amino acid protein (approximately 28 kDa) that aligned well with the C-terminal portion of hSIRT3 (residues 143–399) [34]. Although the originally predicted mSIRT3 lacks the N-terminal 142 amino acids responsible for the mitochondrial localization of the human counterpart, it has still been shown to be localized in mitochondria [35]. In two recent studies, however, two longer forms of mouse SIRT3 (approximately 37 kDa) owning the mitochondrial target signal, were detected [36], [37].

Mouse SIRT3 is highly expressed in various tissues with high energy demands, including brain, kidney, heart and liver. Mouse SIRT3 expression is up-regulated by caloric restriction and cold exposure, and overexpression of mSIRT3 in adipocytes leads to the induction of genes involved in mitochondrial function and thermogenesis [35]. However, little else is currently known about the molecular mechanism of the regulation of Sirt3 gene expression.

Here we show that PGC-1α powerfully stimulates mSIRT3 gene expression, which is mediated by an ERR binding element mapped to the Sirt3 promoter region. Furthermore, we demonstrate that SIRT3 is required for the effects of PGC-1α on mitochondrial-related gene expression, ROS production and mitochondrial biogenesis in muscle cells.

Materials and Methods

Plasmids and Adenoviruses

The mSirt3 promoter (−2036 to +146) was amplified as described previously [34] using mouse genomic DNA and cloned at the Acc65 I and Xho I sites of the pGL3-Basic reporter gene vector (Promega), referred to as Luc-2036. Various fragments of the 5′ flanking promoter region of mSIRT3 were generated by PCR amplification of Luc-2036 followed by cloning into pGL3-Basic using the Acc65 I and Xho I sites. To amplify different promoter regions, the corresponding forward primers 5′-ATTCGGGGTACCATCCAATCCCGGTCTGGTCTAC-3′ (Luc-2036), 5′- ACATTGGTACCAGCGTCCCACTAGCCTCACGGGT-3′ (Luc-491), 5′- ATTCAGGGTACCCAAGGAGGTCGAGAGCGGCGT-3′ (Luc-242), and 5′- ATTCAGGGTACCGCTGCCAGCACCAGGCA-3′ (Luc-161) were used with the identical reverse primer 5′- ATTCAGCTCGAGCTATCTGCGAGATCCCGTGTCT-3′ (+146 bp). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the QuickChange kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. pcDNA3.1-PGC-1α for the expression of human full-length PGC-1α was a gift from Daniel P. Kelly (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Adenoviral vectors expressing GFP, PGC-1α, or ERRα were generated using the AdEasy system as previously described [38]. The adenoviral vector expressing short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) against ERRα (siERRα) was a kind gift from Dr. Anastasia Kralli (Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California), which targets the sequence 5′-GAGCATCCCAGGCTTCTCC-3′ of mouse ERRα [39]. The sequence of siRNA against luciferase (siControl) was 5′-CTTACGCTGAGTACTTCGA-3′; the sequence of siRNA against mSirt3 (siSIRT3) was 5′- GCGTTGTGAAACCCGACAT -3′; and the sequence of siRNA against mouse PGC-1α (siPGC-1α) was 5′- GGTGGATTGAAGTGGTGTAGA-3′ [40]. Inserts were cloned into the pAdTrack-U6 shuttle vector using Bgl II and Hind III, and adenovirus constructs were created by recombination of the shuttle vector and pAdEasy vector by electroporation into BJ5183 bacteria [41]. All plasmid constructs were verified by sequencing.

Cell Culture and Adenoviral Infection

Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293A, HepG2, and C2C12 cell lines from ATCC were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics. Myotube differentiation was induced as previously reported [42]. Primary mouse hepatocytes were obtained from livers of male C57BL/6 mice by collagenase perfusion as previously described [43]. All animal experiments were carried out under protocols approved by the Committee on Animal Research at the Chinese Academy of Medical Science in Beijing and were in accordance with Peking Union Medical College guidelines. Mouse hepatocytes were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS. Mouse hepatocytes and C2C12 myotubes were infected with adenoviruses of interest. Cells were harvested 48 h after infection to perform the various measurements.

Luciferase Assays

HepG2 cells were cultured in 24-well plates and cotransfected with PGC-1α plasmid (0.2 µg/well), ERRα plasmid (0.2 µg/well), luciferase reporter construct (0.2 µg/well), and pRL-TK reporter plasmid (control reporter) (0.006 µg/well) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Vigorous, Beijing, China), or cells were infected with adenovirus expressing control shRNA or shRNA against ERRα. The mass of transfected plasmids was balanced with empty vector (pcDNA3.1). After transfection for 48 h, cells were harvested and measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega), and luciferase activity was divided by the Renilla luciferase activity (control reporter) to normalize for transfection efficiency. All luciferase assay experiments were performed 3 times at least, and each conducted in triplicate.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)

EMSA was carried out using the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Pierce) as previously described [44]. Briefly, 293A cells were cultured in 100 mm dishes and then transfected with ERRα expressing plasmid (10 µg). After 24 h, the nuclear proteins were extracted according to the manufacturer's protocol (Pierce). The sequence of the wild-type oligonucleotide SIRT3-ERRE-WT was 5′- Biotin-GGTTTCTGGCCCTGCCCTTGAGGCATTA AAGAG-3′, whereas the sequence of the mutant oligonucleotide SIRT3-ERRE-mut was 5′- GGTTTCTGGCCCTGtaaTTGAGGCATTAAAGAG-3′. Equal amounts of complementary oligonucleotides were annealed. Biotin-labeled probes and protein were combined in a total volume of 20 µl reaction buffer. In competition analysis, a 200-fold excess of unlabeled competitor DNA was added to the reaction mixture. After pre-incubation for 10 min at room temperature, 20 fmol of biotin end-labeled probe was added, and the incubation was continued for an additional 20 min. The protein-DNA complexes were then resolved in a nondenaturing 6% acrylamide gel in 0.5×TBE buffer at 100 V. After electrophoresis, the gel and nylon membrane were sandwiched in a clean electrophoretic transfer unit according the manufacturer's instructions at 380 mA for 60 min. When the transfer was completed, transferred DNA was immediately cross-linked to the membrane at 120 mJ/cm2 for 60 seconds. Afterward, biotin-labeled DNA was detected by chemiluminescence reagent.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays

Mouse hepatocytes were extracted or infected with adenoviruses expressing FLAG-tagged ERRα, PGC-1α or GFP as a control. After 48 h, cells were harvested in PBS and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde, lysed, and subjected to chromatin shearing by sonication. Immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-PGC-1α (Calbiochem) or M2 anti-FLAG antibody or normal mouse IgG (Sigma), followed by incubation with protein G-Sepharose. After chromatin immunoprecipitation, DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction. PCR analysis was performed with input (2% of total immunoprecipitation) and immunoprecipitated DNA. The primers were designed to amplify the region −491 to −319 bp of the mouse SIRT3 promoter containing an ERR binding site: 5′-AGCGTCCCACTAGCCTCACGGGTTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAGGACCCAAGTCTGCAGGCTTGAG-3′ (reverse). The primers for the distal region (from −1400 to −1271 bp) of the mouse Sirt3 promoter were 5′-GAGACAGCGTCAACTCCCACTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCAATGCCTTCAAGGCTGAAG-3′ (reverse).

RNA isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA from cultured cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was then reverse-transcribed and amplified by PCR using a Transcriptor Reverse Transcriptase kit (Roche). Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out using the SYBR Green PCR system on a Bio-Rad iQ5, and results were normalized to β-actin or cyclophilin A. The sequences of primers are shown in table 1.

Table 1
Primer details.

Western blotting

C2C12 myotubes were cultured in 60 mm dishes, infected with adenoviruses and, 48 h later, lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, and 1% NP40) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) (Roche) and phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM NaF and 1 mM NaVO3). Samples were incubated at 4°C for 1 h and then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected for analysis. Lysates were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked and incubated with specific antibodies against SIRT3 (Millipore), PGC-1α (Calbiochem), SOD2 (Millipore) and actin (Sigma). Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin secondary antibody was used. Proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

Measurement of intracellular superoxide levels

Superoxide production was detected using the fluorescent dye dihydroethidium (DHE) obtained from Vigorous according to a previous study [45]. C2C12 myotubes were cultured in 6-well plates, infected with indicated adenoviruses, and 48 h later washed with PBS and labeled with DHE (5 µmol/L dissolved in 1% DMSO) in the culture plates at 37°C for 30 minutes in PBS. Culture plates were placed on ice to stop the labeling, trypsinized, and resuspended in ice-cold PBS. Samples were analyzed using a flow cytometer (COULTER EPICS®) and Expo32ADC software. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 10,000 cells was analyzed in each sample and corrected for autofluorescence from unlabeled cells.

Mitochondrial DNA copy number

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number was determined as a marker for mitochondrial density using quantitative RT-PCR as previously reported [46], [47]. Briefly, total DNA was isolated from the cells using Universal Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Takara) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A serial dilution standard curve was prepared from a pool of all the samples and real-time PCR was carried out. The mitochondrial DNA copy number was calculated from the ratio of COX II (mitochondrial-encoded gene)/cyclophilin A (nuclear-encoded gene). The primers are shown in Table 1.

Statistical Analysis

The data are reported as the mean ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments. Differences between groups were compared by Student's t test and P values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

PGC-1α induces mouse Sirt3 gene expression

Previous studies have suggested SIRT1 directly interacts with and deacetylates transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α [42], [48]. Additionally, overexpression of SIRT3 leads to increased PGC-1α gene expression in HIB1B brown adipocytes [35]. Both PGC-1α and sirtuins have been demonstrated to play key roles in energy metabolism. Therefore, we were prompted to study the association of PGC-1α and sirtuin family members to determine if PGC-1α affects the expression levels of sirtuin members.

Differentiated C2C12 and mouse primary hepatocytes were infected with adenovirus expressing PGC-1α or GFP (control). Total RNA was extracted from infected cells, and mRNAs of sirtuin family members were measured by real-time PCR. We observed that Sirt3 mRNA levels were increased by approximately 7-fold by PGC-1α in C2C12 myotubes compared to control cells (Fig. 1A). In addition, PGC-1α stimulated Sirt3 mRNA level by approximately 70-fold and 2.8-fold in mouse primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells, respectively (Fig. 1A). These increases in Sirt3 mRNA were accompanied by potent up-regulation of the protein levels of mSIRT3 variants in C2C12 cells and mouse primary hepatocytes (Fig. 1B). In contrast to Sirt3, PGC-1α did not alter the expression of other sirtuin members (data not shown).

Figure 1
PGC-1α regulates the expression of SIRT3.

PGC-1α is induced in mouse liver upon fasting [7], [8] and in C2C12 cells during differentiation [46]. Thus, we speculated that Sirt3 may be similarly regulated under these conditions. As expected, the Sirt3 mRNA level was significantly increased in myotubes compared to that in myoblasts (Fig. 1C), and fasting induced Sirt3 gene expression in mouse liver (Fig. 1C). Meanwhile, we also observed that PGC-1α was induced under these conditions, which was consistent with previous reports.

To determine the role of PGC-1α in the regulation of Sirt3 gene expression during these physiological processes, we employed a siRNA strategy to specifically knock down PGC-1α gene expression. A siRNA sequence (siPGC-1α) has been shown to effectively silence PGC-1α gene expression [40]. Adenoviruses expressing shRNA against PGC-1α were constructed and used to infect C2C12 myotubes and primary hepatocytes. Knockdown of PGC-1α in C2C12 myotubes and primary hepatocytes by siPGC-1α reduced the expression of Sirt3 (Fig. 1D). Taken together, these data indicate that PGC-1α functions as an upstream activator of Sirt3 gene expression and is required for the induction of Sirt3 in C2C12 cells and hepatocytes.

The stimulatory effect of PGC-1α on the Sirt3 promoter is mediated by the ERR binding element located between −407 bp and −399 bp upstream of the Sirt3 transcription start site

To demonstrate that PGC-1α-dependent stimulation of Sirt3 gene expression occurs at the transcriptional level, we transfected a promoter reporter into HepG2 cells. The first construct contained the approximately 2.2-kb fragment (−2036, +146) of the mSirt3 promoter fused to a luciferase reporter gene (Luc-2036) (Fig. 2A). Overexpression of PGC-1α caused a 4-fold activation of Luc-2036 (Fig. 2B). Next, a series of truncated segments of the promoter fused to the luciferase gene (Luc-491, Luc-242, and Luc-161) were transfected into HepG2 cells to map the cis-acting element conferring the PGC-1α-dependent activation of luciferase. PGC-1α-mediated reporter activation was not significantly compromised upon deletion of the −2036 bp to −491 bp region of the mSirt3 promoter. However, further deletion of −491 bp to −242 bp abolished the PGC-1α effect on the mSIRT3 promoter (Fig. 2B). Further truncation of the promoter from −242 bp to −161 bp did not accentuate the process (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
ERRα mediates the PGC-1α activation of the Sirt3 gene promoter in HepG2 cells.

Next, we searched for the sequence motif in the mSirt3 gene promoter that conferred sensitivity to PGC-1α. The sequence between −491 bp and −242 bp was analyzed, and a putative ERRE (CAAGGGCA) was revealed at position −407/−399 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site (Fig. 2D, left panel). In addition, we compared this motif and its flanking sequence of the mSirt3 promoter with corresponding promoter sequences from different species, including rat, humans and chimpanzee. Based on the results from sequence alignment, the putative ERR binding site located at −407/−399 bp is evolutionarily conserved (Fig. 2C). PGC-1α transactivates transcription of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation through coactivating ERRα [49]. Thus, we hypothesized that ERRα mediates the PGC-1α stimulatory effect on the Sirt3 promoter.

Transfection of the PGC-1α expression plasmid alone in HepG2 cells activated Luci-2036 and Luci-491 each approximately 4-fold, and cotransfection of ERRα with PGC-1α activates Luci-2036 and Luci-491 each approximately 9-fold, while this effect was diminished upon further deletion of the promoter region from −491 bp to −242 bp (Luc-242) (Fig. 2B).

Mutational studies were further performed to investigate the involvement of ERR in the PGC-1α activation of the mSirt3 promoter. The potential ERR binding element was mutated from the Luc-2036 sequence (Fig. 2D, left panel), which has been demonstrated to inactivate this element previously [50]. Wild-type Luc-2036 and its mutant were transfected into HepG2 cells in the presence or absence of PGC-1α and/or ERRα. We observed that PGC-1α activated wild-type mSirt3 promoter activity and the cotransfection of PGC-1α and ERRα enhanced this effect (Fig. 2D, right panel). However, the transfection with ERRα expression plasmid alone yielded no significant increase in promoter activity (data not shown), which indicating PGC-1α and ERRα have a synergic effect. In sharp contrast, PGC-1α activation of the mSirt3 promoter was almost completely abolished upon ERRE mutation (Fig. 2D, right panel). These results clearly suggest that this ERRE mediates PGC-1α activation of mSirt3 gene expression.

ERRα binds to the mSirt3 promoter and is required for PGC-1α- induced Sirt3 expression

To determine whether ERRα binds to the potential binding element identified in the mSirt3 gene promoter in vitro, a DNA fragment encompassing the sequence −386/−419 was biotin-labeled, and EMSA was carried out using nuclear protein extracted from 293A cells transfected with ERRα expression vector. A retardation band (DNA-protein complex) was specifically detected, and it almost completely disappeared upon the use of 200-fold excess of unlabeled wild-type oligonucleotides. However, 200-fold excess of unlabeled mutant oligonucleotides did not affect the formation of the DNA-protein complex (Fig. 3A).

Figure 3
ERRα interacts with the mouse Sirt3 promoter in vitro and in vivo.

To further confirm that ERRα binds to the Sirt3 promoter in vivo, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed. To this end, mouse primary hepatocytes were isolated and infected with adenoviruses expressing GFP or ERRα-FLAG in the absence or presence of PGC-1α. Chromatin was precipitated with anti-FLAG or normal mouse IgG (negative control). Primers were designed to amplify a fragment of the ERRE flanking region. A fragment of the promoter (−319/−491) was PCR amplified. As shown in Figure 3B, the mSirt3 promoter fragment containing the ERRE was amplified from the precipitates using FLAG-specific antibody but not from those with normal mouse IgG in cells infected with Ad-ERRα-FLAG. Moreover, no amplification was observed in cells infected with Ad-GFP. It is noteworthy that chromatin isolated from cells co-infected with Ad-PGC-1α and Ad-ERRα-FLAG resulted in much stronger amplification of the Sirt3 promoter containing the ERRE than that from cells infected with Ad-ERRα-FLAG alone, indicating PGC-1α increased ERRα binding to the Sirt3 promoter in vivo.

To determine whether endogenous PGC-1α occupies the mSirt3 promoter region in primary hepatocytes and whether this is dependent on the ERRE in the gene promoter, ChIP was performed and chromatin was precipitated with anti-PGC-1α antibody. The mSIRT3 promoter sequence containing the ERRE (proximal region) could be amplified from the precipitates obtained using the anti-PGC-1α antibody, but not from the control IgG sample (Fig. 3C). As expected, the distal promoter region without an ERRE, used as a negative control, could not be amplified from any of the immunoprecipitates. Collectively, these data confirm the interaction of ERRα with an ERRE identified in the mSirt3 promoter in vivo and in vitro, and they reveal that endogenous PGC-1α can be recruited to the proximal region containing this ERRE.

To further determine the role of ERRα in the PGC-1α induction of Sirt3 expression, we used siRNA oligonucleotides that have been demonstrated to specifically knock down ERRα gene expression [39]. As shown in Fig. 4A, ERRα knockdown compromised the ability of PGC-1α to activate the mSirt3 promoter. Moreover, siRNA against ERRα reduced the PGC-1α induction of endogenous mSirt3 mRNA level in C2C12 cells (Fig. 4B). We observed that PGC-1α still stimulated Sirt3 gene expression after knocking down ERRα, which may have resulted from decreased but not completely abolished ERRα expression by the siRNA. These results clearly indicate that ERRα plays an important role in mediating the PGC-1α induction of Sirt3 expression.

Figure 4
ERRα is required for the PGC-1α induction of Sirt3 expression.

Sirt3 knockdown suppresses PGC-1α-induced mitochondrial-related gene expression

PGC-1α activates mitochondrial-related gene expression in skeletal muscle cells, including ATP synthase and cytochrome c, which are important components of the electron transport chain, as well as SOD2 and GPx1, which are involved in ROS metabolism [6]. Mouse SIRT3 is localized in the mitochondria and associated with energy metabolism [26], [35]. We wondered whether SIRT3 mediates the PGC-1α effect on the expression of these mitochondrial-related genes in myotubes. Adenoviruses expressing shRNAs targeting mSirt3 were constructed. The shRNA were expressed effectively under the control of a U6 RNA promoter. An efficient shRNA sequence (siSIRT3) for silencing mSirt3 expression was selected from several candidates. siSIRT3 decreased basal SIRT3 protein level by more than 60% compared with the luciferase shRNA (negative control) (Fig. 5A). siRNA against mSirt3 significantly suppressed the PGC-1α induction of endogenous Sirt3 mRNA level (Fig. 5B). Therefore, this effective siRNA was employed in the following experiments. C2C12 myotubes were infected with various combinations of adenoviruses. As expected, PGC-1α activated some mitochondrial-related genes, including ATP synthase, cytochrome c, and the ROS-detoxifying enzymes GPx1 and SOD2. Moreover, coinfection with Ad-ERRα and Ad-PGC-1α led to further enhancement of these gene expression levels (Fig. 5C). In contrast, PGC-1α-induced mitochondrial gene expression was largely prevented upon knockdown of Sirt3 in C2C12 cells (Fig. 5C). However, the control siRNA did not affect the PGC-1α activation of these genes. In addition, we measured SOD2 protein levels in C2C12 myotubes infected with various combinations of adenoviruses. As shown in Figure 5D, siSIRT3 decreased the baseline protein level of SOD2 and reduced the induction of SOD2 by PGC-1α (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5
SIRT3 mediates the PGC-1α induction of mitochondrial-related genes in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells.

Overexpression of Sirt3 in cardiomyocytes is capable of modulating the activity of antioxidants [27]. An adenovirus expressing the long version of mSirt3 was constructed and used to infect C2C12 myotubes. As anticipated, overexpression of Sirt3 in C2C12 myotubes increased the mRNA levels of ATP5c and GPx1, but not SOD2 or Cyt c. (Fig. 5E). These data demonstrate that Sirt3 functions as a downstream target gene of PGC-1α and mediates, at least in part, the effects of PGC-1α on the ROS defense system.

SIRT3 mediates the effects of PGC-1α on intracellular ROS levels and mitochondrial biogenesis

SIRT3 is localized in the inner mitochondrial membrane [32] along with the electron transport chain. PGC-1α is suggested to be a potent stimulator of mitochondrial biogenesis [5], [6] and a powerful regulator of ROS metabolism. Although PGC-1α stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and energy metabolism, it suppresses ROS production in cells through induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes [14]. The mitochondrion is the major site of superoxide formation, and the accumulation of superoxide is believed to contribute to oxidative damage associated with degenerative disease and aging [51]. Since knockdown of Sirt3 suppressed the PGC-1α induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes, it seemed logical to propose that SIRT3 mediates the PGC-1α-dependent down-regulation of intracellular superoxide levels.

As shown in Figure 6A, the basal superoxide level was decreased in C2C12 myotubes infected with adenovirus expressing Sirt3 compared with control cells as evaluated with ROS-activated fluorescent dye DHE, suggesting SIRT3 plays an important role in ROS production. Meanwhile, inhibition of endogenous PGC-1α or SIRT3 by adenovirus expressing shRNA in C2C12 myotubes caused an increase of cellular ROS production (Fig. 6B). In contrast, overexpression of PGC-1α in C2C12 myotubes with adenovirus caused a decrease of ROS production (Fig. 6C). Interestingly, knockdown of Sirt3 gene expression with adenoviruses rescued the inhibitory effect of PGC-1α on ROS production, and the intracellular ROS level was almost completely recovered, which suggests SIRT3 mediates the PGC-1α suppression of ROS production in muscle cells (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6
SIRT3 controls intracellular ROS levels.

We also evaluated the role of SIRT3 in the PGC-1α effect on mitochondrial biogenesis. To measure mitochondrial DNA directly, we isolated total DNA and determined the relative copy number of mitochondrial DNA by a qPCR assay of the mitochondrial DNA–encoded COX II gene. Adenovirus-mediated overexpression of SIRT3 led to an increase in mitochondrial DNA content per cell by 1.7-fold (Fig. 7A), while inhibition of endogenous SIRT3 by shRNA did not change the basal mitochondrial DNA content (data not shown). As anticipated, overexpression of PGC-1α also increased the mitochondrial DNA copy number (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, knockdown of endogenous mSIRT3 reduced the induction of mitochondrial biogenesis by PGC-1α (Fig. 7B). In addition, mRNA transcript levels of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) subunits I and II (mitochondrial-encoded) and subunit VIIa (nuclear- encoded) were induced by PGC-1α (Fig. 7C). Knockdown of endogenous mSIRT3 blocked the PGC-1α effect on COX I, COX II and COX VIIa1 gene expression (Fig. 7C). These results reveal the important physiological role of SIRT3 in mitochondrial biogenesis.

Figure 7
SIRT3 mediates the PGC-1α induction of mitochondrial biogenesis in C2C12 myotubes.

Previous work has suggested overexpression of SIRT3 in brown adipocytes leads to increased CREB phosphorylation, subsequent stimulation of the expression of PGC-1α and its target gene UCP1, and, ultimately, decreased intracellular ROS level [35]. Another study demonstrated that PGC-1α suppresses ROS production through the induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes [14]. Finally, SIRT3 interacts with and deacetylates Foxo3a to activate its target gene SOD2 in cells [27]. Based on these data and our observations, we propose a model of the mechanism of SIRT3 action on ROS production and mitochondrial biogenesis (Fig. 8). In this model, SIRT3 stimulates PGC-1α gene expression through increased CREB phosphorylation. Meanwhile, PGC-1α induces SIRT3 expression through ERRα, thus forming a positive-feedback loop. In addition to suppression of basal ROS production in cells, our data clearly demonstrate that SIRT3 mediated the PGC-1α induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes and reduction of ROS level. Finally, our results also reveal a physiological role for SIRT3 in mitochondrial biogenesis.

Figure 8
Scheme illustrating a regulatory pathway including PGC-1α and SIRT3 governing ROS level and mitochondrial biogenesis.

Discussion

Sirtuins are NAD+-dependent enzymes that have been implicated in a wide range of physiological and pathophysiological conditions, including diabetes, cancer, life span and neurodegeneration, through deacetylation of numerous substrates [52]. Seven mammalian sirtuin members have been identified to date. One well-studied sirtuin, SIRT1, is reported to interact with and deacetylate PGC-1α to increase its activity, subsequently leading to the induction of liver gluconeogenic genes and the promotion of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid oxidation in muscle cells [42], [48].

SIRT3 is a soluble mitochondrial protein controlling global mitochondrial protein acetylation levels. Sirt3 knockout mice show striking mitochondrial protein hyperacetylation [25]. Furthermore, SIRT3 deacetylates AceCS2, GDH, Fox3a and Ku70 to regulate their activity [23], [24], [25], [27], [28], [29]. These observations implicate SIRT3 in the regulation of energy metabolism. Thus, we decided to further investigate the association between PGC-1α and sirtuin members.

Our data suggest that PGC-1α stimulates SIRT3 expression at the mRNA and protein levels. We did not observe an effect of PGC-1α on other sirtuins. PGC-1β, another member of the PGC-1 family, mildly stimulated SIRT3 gene expression (approximately 2-fold) in C2C12 cells (data not shown), much less effectively than PGC-1α. We speculate that PGC-1β also activates Sirt3 transcription through the ERRE identified in the mSirt3 gene promoter because PGC-1β interacts with and coactivates ERRα to stimulate downstream target genes [20].

Current studies of SIRT3 mainly focus on its cellular localization and identification of its substrates. However, the molecular mechanism regulating Sirt3 gene expression remains unknown. Our data demonstrate the existence of a regulatory pathway that drives mitochondrial ROS generation and mitochondrial biogenesis that is defined by PGC-1α, ERRα and SIRT3. This is supported by the following evidence: First, PGC-1α increased the expression of SIRT3 mRNA and protein. PGC-1α knockdown by shRNA reduced Sirt3 mRNA level. Second, the stimulatory effect of PGC-1α depended on the intact ERR binding site in the mSirt3 promoter, and cotransfection of PGC-1α and ERRα had a synergic effect on mSIRT3 promoter activity. Interestingly, overexpression or inhibition of ERRα had no effect on Sirt3 promoter activity or mRNA level in the absence of PGC-1α, leading us to conclude that ERRα contributes to the PGC-1α-mediated induction but not the basal expression of Sirt3. Third, EMSA and ChIP demonstrated ERRα binding to the ERRE identified in the Sirt3 promoter in vitro and in vivo, and PGC-1α further enhanced ERRα binding to the Sirt3 promoter in vivo. Fourth, induction of mitochondrial-related gene expression, including the ROS-detoxifying enzymes SOD2 and GPx1, by PGC-1α was impaired by Sirt3 knockdown in C2C12 myotubes. Fifth, knockdown of SIRT3 diminished the effect of PGC-1α on cellular ROS level and mitochondrial biogenesis. Finally, PGC-1α action explains the stimulatory effect of C2C12 differentiation and nutrient treatment in mice on Sirt3 expression. Taken together, our data suggest that Sirt3 is a new downstream target gene of PGC-1α and that SIRT3, at least in part, mediates the effects of PGC-1α on mitochondrial metabolism.

Mitochondria are a major source of superoxide formed by the reaction of respiratory chain enzymes with molecular oxygen. PGC-1α stimulates mitochondrial energy metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis through coactivation of several transcription factors. PGC-1α increases the expression of most, if not all, mitochondrial proteins, which could cause an increase of ROS production. However, PGC-1α can induce the expression of genes reducing ROS formation [6], [53], [54]. St-Pierre et al. reported that PGC-1α is required for the induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes under oxidative stress conditions and that PGC-1α–null mice are more sensitive to oxidative stress affecting the hippocampus [14]. Our data demonstrate that PGC-1α is a suppressor of ROS generation in skeletal muscle cells by increasing the expression of GPx1 and SOD2. We also show that knockdown of endogenous SIRT3 expression led to an increase of cellular ROS level and that overexpression of SIRT3 decreased the ROS level, indicating that SIRT3 acts as suppressor of ROS formation like PGC-1α in vivo and mediates the effect of PGC-1α on cellular ROS production. These results are consistent with a previous report that constitutive expression of SIRT3 reduces ROS production in brown adipocytes [35]. Longevity is a complex phenomenon, and the sirtuins have been shown to play a role in the genetic regulation of longevity. Of interest, it has been reported that polymorphism in the hSirt3 gene is linked to longevity [30], [31]. In tumor cells, hSIRT3 is identified as a cell survival factor that protects cells from genotoxic stress [55]. However, less is currently known about the mechanism of SIRT3-mediated cell protection during stress. Our results suggest that SIRT3 can inhibit the formation of ROS, which are implicated in aging and cancer. Thus, we speculated that the functional role of SIRT3 in longevity and cell survival contributes to its suppression of the ROS level.

PGC-1α induces mitochondrial biogenesis through coactivation of NRF-1 and NRF-2 to increase mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) [5]. We found that inhibition of SIRT3 expression by shRNA diminished the PGC-1α induction of mitochondrial biogenesis. A possible explanation is that NRF-1 and mtTFA, which localize to mitochondria, are also substrates of SIRT3 and their activities are regulated by SIRT3. Further studies are required to determine the molecular mechanism by which SIRT3 controls mitochondrial biogenesis. SIRT3-null mice exhibit mitochondrial protein hyperacetylation [25] and reduced basal levels of ATP in the heart, kidney and liver tissues [26], but these reports did not indicate whether mitochondrial DNA number is reduced in these tissues of Sirt3-knockout mice. In this study, we also provide evidence that SIRT3 is necessary for PGC-1α induction of Cyt c and ATP synthase, both of which are key components of the electron transport chain. It is logical to propose that SIRT3 participates in lipid acid oxidation and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.

Human SIRT3 has two different forms, a full-length protein (approximately 44 kDa) and a shorter, active form (approximately 28 kDa) lacking the N-terminal 142 amino acids [33], [56]. However, the molecular weight of mouse SIRT3 is controversial. Sundaresan et al. reported that the full-length mSIRT3 protein (precursor) is 44 kDa [28], while Cooper et al. and Jin et al. reported that the longer variant should be 37 kDa [36], [37]. Since the long variant of mSIRT3 consists of 334 amino acids, we calculate that the longer variant should be 37 kDa. Our western blot results confirmed that there were two forms of endogenous mSIRT3 (37 kDa and 28 kDa) detected by the antibody recognizing the C-terminus of mSIRT3.

In addition, the subcellular localization of SIRT3 also remains controversial. Initial studies suggested that full-length and processed forms of hSIRT3 are localized in mitochondria [32], [33], but another study indicated that full-length hSIRT3 is localized in the nucleus and that processed forms are localized in the mitochondria [56]. Mouse SIRT3 was originally identified to be localized in the mitochondria [35]; in contrast, another recent study showed that the full-length form of mSIRT3 is present in the mitochondria and the 28-kDa form is detectable in the mitochondria, nucleus and cytoplasm [36], [37]. We detected mSIRT3 protein in both nucleus and mitochondria in C2C12 cells, and both nuclear and mitochondrial mSIRT3 were induced by PGC-1α (data not shown).

Overexpression of SIRT3 in brown adipocytes activates CREB phosphorylation, resulting in stimulation of PGC-1α and UCP1 gene expression, consequently decreasing the cellular ROS level. Another recent study reported that SIRT3 can deacetylate Foxo3a to activate its target gene SOD2 [27], [29]. In addition, PGC-1α suppressed ROS production through induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes [14]. We summarize these results and propose a model of the mechanism of SIRT3 action on ROS production and mitochondrial biogenesis. As shown in Figure 8, PGC-1α induces SIRT3 expression through coactivation of ERRα, and in turn, SIRT3 stimulates PGC-1α gene expression through activation of CREB phosphorylation, thus forming a positive-feedback loop. In addition to suppression of basal ROS production in cells, SIRT3 mediates the induction of ROS-detoxifying enzymes and reduction of ROS level by PGC-1α. Finally, our results also reveal the physiological role of SIRT3 in mitochondrial biogenesis.

ROS-related damage has been implicated in cancer, aging, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases, and SIRT3 plays important roles in reducing cellular ROS level. As a regulatory enzyme, SIRT3 may be used as a therapeutic target to treat these ROS-related diseases.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by collective grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program 2006CB503909), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program 2006AA02Z192 and 2006AA02A409), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.30700386, No.30721063, No.30800389 and No. 90919019) and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant No. 7082056). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Lin J, Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab. 2005;1:361–370. [PubMed]
2. Finck BN, Kelly DP. PGC-1 coactivators: inducible regulators of energy metabolism in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:615–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Wang YX, Lee CH, Tiep S, Yu RT, Ham J, et al. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity. Cell. 2003;113:159–170. [PubMed]
4. Giguere V. To ERR in the estrogen pathway. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2002;13:220–225. [PubMed]
5. Wu Z, Puigserver P, Andersson U, Zhang C, Adelmant G, et al. Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell. 1999;98:115–124. [PubMed]
6. St-Pierre J, Lin J, Krauss S, Tarr PT, Yang R, et al. Bioenergetic analysis of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivators 1alpha and 1beta (PGC-1alpha and PGC-1beta) in muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:26597–26603. [PubMed]
7. Herzig S, Long F, Jhala US, Hedrick S, Quinn R, et al. CREB regulates hepatic gluconeogenesis through the coactivator PGC-1. Nature. 2001;413:179–183. [PubMed]
8. Yoon JC, Puigserver P, Chen G, Donovan J, Wu Z, et al. Control of hepatic gluconeogenesis through the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Nature. 2001;413:131–138. [PubMed]
9. Lin J, Wu PH, Tarr PT, Lindenberg KS, St-Pierre J, et al. Defects in adaptive energy metabolism with CNS-linked hyperactivity in PGC-1alpha null mice. Cell. 2004;119:121–135. [PubMed]
10. Leone TC, Lehman JJ, Finck BN, Schaeffer PJ, Wende AR, et al. PGC-1alpha deficiency causes multi-system energy metabolic derangements: muscle dysfunction, abnormal weight control and hepatic steatosis. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e101. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
11. Balaban RS, Nemoto S, Finkel T. Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell. 2005;120:483–495. [PubMed]
12. Arsenijevic D, Onuma H, Pecqueur C, Raimbault S, Manning BS, et al. Disruption of the uncoupling protein-2 gene in mice reveals a role in immunity and reactive oxygen species production. Nat Genet. 2000;26:435–439. [PubMed]
13. Echtay KS, Roussel D, St-Pierre J, Jekabsons MB, Cadenas S, et al. Superoxide activates mitochondrial uncoupling proteins. Nature. 2002;415:96–99. [PubMed]
14. St-Pierre J, Drori S, Uldry M, Silvaggi JM, Rhee J, et al. Suppression of reactive oxygen species and neurodegeneration by the PGC-1 transcriptional coactivators. Cell. 2006;127:397–408. [PubMed]
15. Horard B, Vanacker JM. Estrogen receptor-related receptors: orphan receptors desperately seeking a ligand. J Mol Endocrinol. 2003;31:349–357. [PubMed]
16. Giguere V, Yang N, Segui P, Evans RM. Identification of a new class of steroid hormone receptors. Nature. 1988;331:91–94. [PubMed]
17. Luo J, Sladek R, Carrier J, Bader JA, Richard D, et al. Reduced fat mass in mice lacking orphan nuclear receptor estrogen-related receptor alpha. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:7947–7956. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Dufour CR, Wilson BJ, Huss JM, Kelly DP, Alaynick WA, et al. Genome-wide orchestration of cardiac functions by the orphan nuclear receptors ERRalpha and gamma. Cell Metab. 2007;5:345–356. [PubMed]
19. Huss JM, Kopp RP, Kelly DP. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) coactivates the cardiac-enriched nuclear receptors estrogen-related receptor-alpha and -gamma. Identification of novel leucine-rich interaction motif within PGC-1alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:40265–40274. [PubMed]
20. Kamei Y, Ohizumi H, Fujitani Y, Nemoto T, Tanaka T, et al. PPARgamma coactivator 1beta/ERR ligand 1 is an ERR protein ligand, whose expression induces a high-energy expenditure and antagonizes obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12378–12383. [PubMed]
21. Michan S, Sinclair D. Sirtuins in mammals: insights into their biological function. Biochem J. 2007;404:1–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Saunders LR, Verdin E. Sirtuins: critical regulators at the crossroads between cancer and aging. Oncogene. 2007;26:5489–5504. [PubMed]
23. Hallows WC, Lee S, Denu JM. Sirtuins deacetylate and activate mammalian acetyl-CoA synthetases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10230–10235. [PubMed]
24. Schwer B, Bunkenborg J, Verdin RO, Andersen JS, Verdin E. Reversible lysine acetylation controls the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme acetyl-CoA synthetase 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:10224–10229. [PubMed]
25. Lombard DB, Alt FW, Cheng HL, Bunkenborg J, Streeper RS, et al. Mammalian Sir2 homolog SIRT3 regulates global mitochondrial lysine acetylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:8807–8814. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Ahn BH, Kim HS, Song S, Lee IH, Liu J, et al. A role for the mitochondrial deacetylase Sirt3 in regulating energy homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:14447–14452. [PubMed]
27. Sundaresan NR, Gupta M, Kim G, Rajamohan SB, Isbatan A, et al. Sirt3 blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting Foxo3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:2758–2771. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
28. Sundaresan NR, Samant SA, Pillai VB, Rajamohan SB, Gupta MP. SIRT3 is a stress-responsive deacetylase in cardiomyocytes that protects cells from stress-mediated cell death by deacetylation of Ku70. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:6384–6401. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29. Jacobs KM, Pennington JD, Bisht KS, Aykin-Burns N, Kim HS, et al. SIRT3 interacts with the daf-16 homolog FOXO3a in the mitochondria, as well as increases FOXO3a dependent gene expression. Int J Biol Sci. 2008;4:291–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Rose G, Dato S, Altomare K, Bellizzi D, Garasto S, et al. Variability of the SIRT3 gene, human silent information regulator Sir2 homologue, and survivorship in the elderly. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:1065–1070. [PubMed]
31. Bellizzi D, Rose G, Cavalcante P, Covello G, Dato S, et al. A novel VNTR enhancer within the SIRT3 gene, a human homologue of SIR2, is associated with survival at oldest ages. Genomics. 2005;85:258–263. [PubMed]
32. Onyango P, Celic I, McCaffery JM, Boeke JD, Feinberg AP. SIRT3, a human SIR2 homologue, is an NAD-dependent deacetylase localized to mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13653–13658. [PubMed]
33. Schwer B, North BJ, Frye RA, Ott M, Verdin E. The human silent information regulator (Sir)2 homologue hSIRT3 is a mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dependent deacetylase. J Cell Biol. 2002;158:647–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Yang YH, Chen YH, Zhang CY, Nimmakayalu MA, Ward DC, et al. Cloning and characterization of two mouse genes with homology to the yeast Sir2 gene. Genomics. 2000;69:355–369. [PubMed]
35. Shi T, Wang F, Stieren E, Tong Q. SIRT3, a mitochondrial sirtuin deacetylase, regulates mitochondrial function and thermogenesis in brown adipocytes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:13560–13567. [PubMed]
36. Cooper HM, Huang JY, Verdin E, Spelbrink JN. A new splice variant of the mouse SIRT3 gene encodes the mitochondrial precursor protein. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4986. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Jin L, Galonek H, Israelian K, Choy W, Morrison M, et al. Biochemical characterization, localization, and tissue distribution of the longer form of mouse SIRT3. Protein Sci. 2009;18:514–525. [PubMed]
38. He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, Yu J, Kinzler KW, et al. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:2509–2514. [PubMed]
39. Herzog B, Cardenas J, Hall RK, Villena JA, Budge PJ, et al. Estrogen-related receptor alpha is a repressor of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene transcription. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:99–106. [PubMed]
40. Koo SH, Satoh H, Herzig S, Lee CH, Hedrick S, et al. PGC-1 promotes insulin resistance in liver through PPAR-alpha-dependent induction of TRB-3. Nat Med. 2004;10:530–534. [PubMed]
41. Zhao LJ, Jian H, Zhu H. Specific gene inhibition by adenovirus-mediated expression of small interfering RNA. Gene. 2003;316:137–141. [PubMed]
42. Gerhart-Hines Z, Rodgers JT, Bare O, Lerin C, Kim SH, et al. Metabolic control of muscle mitochondrial function and fatty acid oxidation through SIRT1/PGC-1alpha. Embo J. 2007;26:1913–1923. [PubMed]
43. Wang YJ, Liu HL, Guo HT, Wen HW, Liu J. Primary hepatocyte culture in collagen gel mixture and collagen sandwich. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:699–702. [PubMed]
44. Kong X, Fan H, Liu X, Wang R, Liang J, et al. peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1alpha enhances antiproliferative activity of 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine in cancer cells through induction of uridine phosphorylase. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;76:854–860. [PubMed]
45. Slane BG, Aykin-Burns N, Smith BJ, Kalen AL, Goswami PC, et al. Mutation of succinate dehydrogenase subunit C results in increased O2.-, oxidative stress, and genomic instability. Cancer Res. 2006;66:7615–7620. [PubMed]
46. Remels AH, Langen RC, Schrauwen P, Schaart G, Schols AM, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2009 [PubMed]
47. Schreiber SN, Emter R, Hock MB, Knutti D, Cardenas J, et al. The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) functions in PPARgamma coactivator 1alpha (PGC-1alpha)-induced mitochondrial biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6472–6477. [PubMed]
48. Rodgers JT, Lerin C, Haas W, Gygi SP, Spiegelman BM, et al. Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1alpha and SIRT1. Nature. 2005;434:113–118. [PubMed]
49. Mootha VK, Handschin C, Arlow D, Xie X, St Pierre J, et al. Erralpha and Gabpa/b specify PGC-1alpha-dependent oxidative phosphorylation gene expression that is altered in diabetic muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6570–6575. [PubMed]
50. Wende AR, Huss JM, Schaeffer PJ, Giguere V, Kelly DP. PGC-1alpha coactivates PDK4 gene expression via the orphan nuclear receptor ERRalpha: a mechanism for transcriptional control of muscle glucose metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:10684–10694. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
51. Brand MD, Buckingham JA, Esteves TC, Green K, Lambert AJ, et al. Mitochondrial superoxide and aging: uncoupling-protein activity and superoxide production. Biochem Soc Symp. 2004:203–213. [PubMed]
52. Anastasiou D, Krek W. SIRT1: linking adaptive cellular responses to aging-associated changes in organismal physiology. Physiology (Bethesda) 2006;21:404–410. [PubMed]
53. Kukidome D, Nishikawa T, Sonoda K, Imoto K, Fujisawa K, et al. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase reduces hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and promotes mitochondrial biogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Diabetes. 2006;55:120–127. [PubMed]
54. Valle I, Alvarez-Barrientos A, Arza E, Lamas S, Monsalve M. PGC-1alpha regulates the mitochondrial antioxidant defense system in vascular endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66:562–573. [PubMed]
55. Yang H, Yang T, Baur JA, Perez E, Matsui T, et al. Nutrient-sensitive mitochondrial NAD+ levels dictate cell survival. Cell. 2007;130:1095–1107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
56. Scher MB, Vaquero A, Reinberg D. SirT3 is a nuclear NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase that translocates to the mitochondria upon cellular stress. Genes Dev. 2007;21:920–928. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science