Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of plosonePLoS OneView this ArticleSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
PLoS One. 2010; 5(7): e11681.
Published online 2010 July 21. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0011681
PMCID: PMC2908134

Molecular Ecology of Pyrethroid Knockdown Resistance in Culex pipiens pallens Mosquitoes

Cesar V. Munayco, Editor


Pyrethroid insecticides have been extensively used in China and worldwide for public health pest control. Accurate resistance monitoring is essential to guide the rational use of insecticides and resistance management. Here we examined the nucleotide diversity of the para-sodium channel gene, which confers knockdown resistance (kdr) in Culex pipiens pallens mosquitoes in China. The sequence analysis of the para-sodium channel gene identified L1014F and L1014S mutations. We developed and validated allele-specific PCR and the real-time TaqMan methods for resistance diagnosis. The real-time TaqMan method is more superior to the allele-specific PCR method as evidenced by higher amplification rate and better sensitivity and specificity. Significant positive correlation between kdr allele frequency and bioassay-based resistance phenotype demonstrates that the frequency of L1014F and L1014S mutations in the kdr gene can be used as a molecular marker for deltamethrin resistance monitoring in natural Cx. pipiens pallens populations in the East China region. The laboratory selection experiment found that L1014F mutation frequency, but not L1014S mutation, responded to deltamethrin selection, suggesting that the L1014F mutation is the key mutation conferring resistance to deltamethrin. High L1014F mutation frequency detected in six populations of Cx. pipens pallens suggests high prevalence of pyrethroid resistance in Eastern China, calling for further surveys to map the resistance in China and for investigating alternative mosquito control strategies.


Current disease vector control strategy is based primarily on the application of insecticides. Pyrethroid insecticides have become by far the most commonly used class of insecticides for indoor residual spray and bednet impregnation due to the low mammalian toxicity and rapid knockdown effect on insects. However, excessive and continuous application of insecticides has caused the development and spread of insecticide resistance, which has become a major obstacle to the control of mosquito-borne diseases [1], [2].

Pyrethroid insecticides bind to insect para-sodium channels and lock them in an open state. Disrupting the transmembrane potential of neurons cause insect paralysis and death. Target site insensitivity due to point mutations in the para-sodium channel is an important mechanism of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in various insect species [3][15]. In African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae, two non-synonymous point mutations in the para-sodium channel gene were found associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides [11]. The mutation detected in West African A. gambiae populations results in substitution of leucine by phenylalanine at position 1014 (L1014F), whereas the mutation in East African populations leads to substitution of leucine by serine (L1014S) [11], [16][21]. Further, both resistance alleles have been reported to co-occur in A. gambiae populations in Nigeria, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania, Malawi and Mozambique [22], and in A. arbiensis in Burkina Faso and Sudan [12], [23].

Culex mosquitoes also exhibit high resistance to pyrethroid insecticides [24], [25]. Culex mosquitoes are important vector of lymphatic filariasis and several viral pathogens, including St. Louis encephalitis, West Nile encephalitis, Eastern equine encephalitis, Venezuelan equine encephalitis and Japanese encephalitis [26], [27]. The most prevalent Culex species in China is Cx. pipiens pallens, and resistance to pyrethroid insecticides was reported [24]. Among Cx. pipiens pallens populations in China, target insensitivity is a major cause of resistance to pyrethroids. In particular, Song and colleagues reported the L1014F kdr allele in Cx. pipiens pallens from northern China [14]. In comparison, two forms of kdr mutations (L1014F and L1014S) were found in Cx. pipiens complex mosquitoes in the US [28]. However, information on the diversity and role of kdr alleles in pyrethroid resistance in Cx. pipiens pallens is lacking. In this study, we aimed to determine the genetic diversity of the kdr gene in natural populations in Eastern China, and to examine the evolutionary response of kdr alleles to insecticide selection to illustrate the role of kdr alleles in pyrethroid resistance. Martinez-Torres et al. (1999) and Song et al. (2007) reported allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) methods for detecting L1014F mutation in Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. pipiens pallens [8], [14]. In the present study we compared the sensitivity and specificity of AS-PCR method to direct sequencing, and developed a highly sensitive and reliable TaqMan probe method that can detect multiple forms of kdr alleles in Cx. pipiens pallens.


Deltamethrin susceptibility bioassay

The mortality rates of Cx. pipiens pallens mosquitoes after one hour exposure to diagnostic 0.05% deltamethrin and followed by 24-hour recovery period are given in Table 1. Mortality rates varied significantly among the six populations (ANOVA; F5,18 = 199.98, P<0.0001), ranging from 20.2% (Tangkou population) to 78.6% (Nanjing). According to the WHO criteria that an insect population is classified as resistant when mortality rate is below 80%, the six Cx. pipiens pallens populations tested here can be classified as resistant to deltamethrin.

Table 1
Culex pipiens pallens mosquito mortality rate in standard WHO deltamethrin resistance bioassay.

Optimization of kdr mutation diagnostic assays

A 521-bp fragment of the sodium channel gene was sequenced from 97 Cx. pipiens pallens individuals of Wuxi population. The wildtype codon sequence is TTA in the 1014 site. We detected two non-synonymous mutations in this site: TTA - TTT and TTA - TCA. The first mutation resulted in replacement of leucine by phenylalanine (L1014F) whereas the second mutation leads to substitution of leucine by serine (L1014S).

Based on the sequence data, we developed a kdr mutation diagnostic method using allele specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR). In this method, a common 521-bp fragment was designed for both resistant and susceptible genotypes (Fig. 1). The discriminating fragments were a 389-bp fragment for wildtype (codon TTA) allele and a 176-bp fragment for mutant (codons TTT and TCA) alleles (Fig. 1). Therefore, genotype scoring was made on the basis of presence/absence of 389 bp and 176 bp fragments. The presence of single fragment indicates homozygous genotypes whereas the presence of both fragments stands for a heterozygote. Among the 97 sequenced specimens that were subjected to AS-PCR, 77 (79.4%) were successfully amplified by AS-PCR and 20 samples (20.6%) failed to amplify after 3 repeated PCR amplifications.

Figure 1
Allele-Specific PCR (AS-PCR) for kdr genotyping.

Due to the high failure rate in PCR amplification of the AS-PCR method, we further tested a real-time TaqMan probe assay (refer to TaqMan method hereafter). Two TaqMan real-time reactions were performed in parallel for each specimen so that L1014F allele and L1014S allele can be diagnosed. In each reaction, a substantial increase in VIC fluorescence indicated a homozygous wildtype genotype, a substantial increase in FAM fluorescence indicated a homozygous mutant genotype and an increase in both signals indicated a heterozygote (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Real-time TaqMan method for genotyping kdr mutations at codon L1014 of para- sodium channel gene in Culex pipiens pallens.

Table 2 summarizes the genotyping results of direct DNA sequencing, AS-PCR and TaqMan method. Using the kdr gene sequence data as a gold standard, AS-PCR method showed 93.5% sensitivity and 95.0% specificity among those amplified samples (note that 20.6% samples were not amplified). The TaqMan method yielded 100% amplifications, 96.9% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity. The positive predictive value of the TaqMan method was 96.9%, substantially higher than the AS-PCR method (74.2%). Both the TaqMan and AS-PCR methods had similar negative predictive values (98.9% for AS-PCR and 99.4% for TaqMan method), the TaqMan method had a higher Kappa value (K = 0.963) than the AS-PCR method (K = 0.803), indicating a higher concordance between direct DNA sequence data and results from the TaqMan method. Therefore, for kdr allele frequency examination described in subsequent sections, we used the TaqMan method.

Table 2
Sensitivity and specificity of allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) and real-time TaqMan methods in reference to allele sequence data for identification of kdr genotypes in Culex pipiens pallens.

Distribution of kdr allele frequencies in natural populations from eastern China

Using the TaqMan method and all individuals tested in susceptibility bioassay, the kdr allele frequencies in six Cx. pipiens pallens populations were examined. Table 3 summarized the frequency of kdr wildtype (L1014) and two mutations (L1014F and L1014S) in relation to survival phenotype in the deltamethrin susceptibility bioassay. We found that the wildtype L1014 allele frequency was significantly higher in those individuals killed by exposure to 0.05% deltamethrin in all six populations (Paired t-test, t = 11.40, d.f. = 5, P<0.0001). In contrast, the L1014F allele frequency was significantly higher in the surviving individuals than those dead individuals in all six populations (Paired t-test, t = 13.18, d.f. = 5, P<0.0001). However, the L1014S allele frequencies were similar between the dead and surviving individuals (Paired t-test, t = 1.65, d.f. = 5, P = 0.16). These data suggest that L1014F allele was associated in resistance to deltamethrin in Cx. pipiens pallens mosquitoes, but the role of L1014S allele in deltamethrin resistance is not clear.

Table 3
Frequencies (in percentage) of kdr alleles in relation to mosquito survival phenotype determined by the deltamethrin susceptibility bioassay in six Culex pipiens pallens populations from China.

The frequency of L1014F and L1014S alleles varied significantly among the six populations (P<0.0001) (Table 3), ranging from 40.3% (Nanjing population) to 79.8% (Tangkou population). When the survival rates were plotted against the frequencies of kdr alleles (L1014F alone, L1014S alone, or L1014F and L1014S combined), the levels of correlation also varied. We found the correlation between L1014S frequencies and survival rates to be poor, with a r2 value of 0.110. In comparison, the correlation between L1014F frequencies and survival rates was significantly better, with a r2 value of 0.870 (P<0.0001). Interestingly, the combined frequencies of L1014F and L1014S showed the best correlation with the survival rates, with a r2 value of 0.978 (P<0.0001) (Fig. 3). These data indicate the combined frequency of L1014F and L1014S is a better indicator of resistance in field mosquito populations than the frequency of either L1014F or L1014S alone.

Figure 3
Relationship between mosquito survivorship in WHO insecticide susceptibility bioassay and frequency of kdr alleles (L1014F and L1014S) combined of Culex pipiens pallens.

Frequency of L1014F and L1014S mutations in response to deltamethrin selection

To further discern the role of L1014F and L1014S mutations in resistance to deltamethrin, we examined the response of these two mutations to deltamethrin selection in Tangkou Cx. pipiens pallens population. After six generations of selection, the 50% lethal concentration (LC50) was increased by 2.77 folds, and by 28.24 folds at generation 12 (Table 4). In the control population without insecticide selection, the LC50 value was constantly reduced at about 0.01 ppm. We observed interesting dynamics of the three kdr alleles in the population subjected to insecticide selection and the control population (Fig. 4). In the population with deltamethrin selection, the wildtype L1014 allele became extinct after six generations, whereas in the control population L1014 allele frequency was increased significantly from 20.2% to 47.5% (χ2 = 24.99, d.f. = 1, P<0.0001) after six generations, and to 58.3% after 12 generations of selection (P<0.0001) (Fig. 4A), demonstrating that the wildtype allele frequency increases in the absence of insecticide selection, likely due to a fitness advantage of susceptible genotype in the absence of insecticide selection pressure. On the other hand, frequency of resistant allele L1014F increased from 71.7% to 93.5% after six generations of deltamethrin selection (χ2 = 31.44, d.f. = 1, P<0.0001) and became fixed after 12 generations of selection (Fig. 4B). In the control population, the L1014F allele frequency declined monotonically (χ2 = 14.29, d.f. = 1, P<0.001). Interestingly, L1014S allele decreased from initial frequency of 8.1% and became completely absent after 12 generations in both the population subjected to selection (χ2 = 11.45, d.f. = 1, P<0.001) and the control population (χ2 = 8.59, d.f. = 1, P<0.01) (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that L1014F mutation is associated with deltamethrin resistance in Cx. pipiens pallens population, and but the L1014S mutation is not directly involved in deltamethrin resistance.

Figure 4
Dynamics of kdr allele frequency in response to deltamethrin selection.
Table 4
Values of 50% lethal concentration (LC50) in Tangkou population of Culex pipiens pallens in response to deltamethrin selection.


Insecticide resistance represents the most important obstacle to insecticide-based vector control approach. Accurately monitoring resistance status is essential to guide the rational use of insecticides and resistance management. In the present study, we examined the nucleotide diversity of kdr gene in Cx. pipiens pallens mosquitoes in China, established molecular detection methods for the two key mutations associated with resistance, and examined the evolutionary dynamics of the two kdr alleles. We further determined that the combined frequency of L1014F and L1014S mutations was significantly associated with resistance measured as survival rate after exposure to a discriminating dose of deltamethrin.

Similar to A. gambiae in Africa [22], we identified two mutations (L1014F and L1014S) in the kdr gene in Cx. pipiens pallens of China. Due to potentially different role of each mutation in insecticide resistance, the molecular diagnostic methods are required to distinguish these two mutations. Allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) methods were reported for kdr detection in Culex mosquitoes [8], [14], but these methods detected only one form of resistance allele (L1014F). We therefore modified the AS-PCR method so that two forms of kdr alleles can be detected. Although the AS-PCR method is rapid and low-cost in terms of capital expenditure and running costs, we found a high failure rate in amplification and low positive predictive value, in relation to the DNA sequencing gold standard. The lack of amplification reliability of AS-PCR method has also been reported in kdr typing of A. gambiae and A. arabiensis by other researchers [22], [29]. Therefore, the AS-PCR method is less valuable for molecular diagnosis of kdr resistance in Cx. pipiens pallens. On the other hand, the TaqMan method performs excellently as evidenced by high amplification rate, high positive and negative predictive values with regards to the kdr gene sequence results. Therefore, we recommend the TapMan method for molecular diagnosis of kdr resistance.

Based on the strong positive correlation between L1014F mutation frequency and mosquito survivorship in mosquito susceptibility bioassay and the evolutionary dynamics of L1014F mutation in response to deltamethrin selection, we suggest the L1014F mutation, not the L1014S mutation, is the key mutation associated with deltamethrin resistance. This notion is supported by following evidences. First, a significantly higher L1014F mutation frequency was consistently detected in the mosquitoes that survived the exposure to the standard WHO deltamethrin test paper in all six populations that we examined. However, this phenomenon was not observed for the L1014S mutation. Second and more importantly, the frequency of L1014F mutation increased monotonically in the laboratory mosquito population subjected to deltamethrin selection, whereas L1014S frequency decreased in both control and selection populations. Although enhanced metabolism of pyrethroid insecticides (e.g. cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of pyrethroids) also contributes to resistance [30], [31], [32], the high correlation coefficient between kdr allele frequency and survival rate of mosquitoes in insecticide susceptibility bioassay found in the current study populations in Eastern China and in Northern China by other investigators [14] suggests that kdr mutation screening is an excellent molecular markers for pyrethroid resistance monitoring in Northern and Eastern China.

The dynamics of kdr alleles in our laboratory populations subjected to insecticide selection supports the hypothesis that L1014F resistance mutation has a fitness cost in the absence of insecticide selection pressure. In the original Tangkou population, the L1014F mutation frequency was 71.7%. Without deltamethrin selection, the L1014F mutation frequency was reduced to 41.7% after 12 generations. With insecticide selection pressure, its frequency increased rapidly and became fixed after 12 generations. While resistance alleles provide advantages in the presence of insecticides, insecticide-resistance genotype often exhibited lower fitness in comparison to the susceptible genotype in the absence of selection pressure from the insecticides. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in a variety of insects, including Colorado potato beetle [33], Plutella xylostella [34], Spodoptera exigua [35], pink bollworm [36], Anopheles gambiae and An. stephensi [37], Culex quinquefasciatus [38], Culex pipiens [39], [40]. It is interesting to note that the frequency of L1014S mutation decreased monotonically in both control population and the population subjected to insecticide selection, suggesting that the L1014S mutation does not directly confer resistance to deltamethrin insecticide. The decrease of L1014S allele frequency should not result from genetic drift because our populations were consistently maintained in large population size (2,000 adult each generation). The low L1014S allele frequency observed in our field-collected Cx. pipiens pallens populations may be a consequence of mosquito exposure to low concentration of DDT and its metabolites in water and soil from past public health vector and agricultural pest control [41], [42]. L1014S mutation is known to be associated with a high level of resistance to DDT, but a low level of resistance to pyrethroids [8].

Our study has important implications for Cx. pipiens pallens mosquito control. The six populations that we studied exhibited high survival rate in the WHO standard insecticide susceptibility bioassay (ranging from 21.4 to 79.8%). Consistently with the bioassay results, we detected high kdr allele frequency in these populations (ranging from 40.3% to 79.8%). Therefore, our results raise a serious concern on the efficacy of pyrethroid insecticides in Eastern China. Further research is required to examine the spatial distribution of kdr alleles and temporal dynamics in relation to insecticide use, determine the efficacy of the insecticides in the field, and research for alternative vector control strategies that minimize the use of insecticides or greatly reduce the spread of insecticide resistance.

Materials and Methods

Mosquito sampling

Six populations of Cx. pipiens pallens were used in this study, including Wuxi (Jiangsu province), Nanjing (Jiangsu province), Huaibei (Anhui province), Weishan (Shandong province), Tangkou (Shandong province) and Qingdao (Shandong province) (Fig. 5). Nanjing population was collected in July 2006 and has been reared in the insectary without exposure to any insecticides. The other five populations were collected from the natural habitats in July to August 2008. For each population, we collected several hundred larvae and pupa from more than 50 larval habitats per geographic site, using the standard 350 ml dippers. After identifying mosquito larvae to species by morphology, they were brought back to the insectary regulated at 28°C and 75% relative humidity and a constant light/dark (14 h[ratio]10 h) cycle. The adults were used in deltamethrin resistance bioassay and kdr allele frequency determination.

Figure 5
Map of China showing the distribution of mosquito sampling sites.

Insecticide susceptibility test

Non-bloodfed female Cx. pipiens pallens mosquitoes, 2 to 3 days post adult emergence, were tested for susceptibility to deltamethrin, using the standard WHO bottle bioassay with standard 0.05% deltamethrin-treated papers [43]. Adults directly reared from field-collected larvae were used for insecticide susceptibility test except that Nanjing population was a laboratory colony. For each population, about 100 female mosquitoes, 3 days post emergence, were tested. Specifically, the mosquitoes were equally divided into 4 groups (4 replicates). We used paraffin oil-treated papers without insecticide as control, which included 25 female mosquitoes for each population. After 1-hr exposure to diagnostic concentration of deltamethrin (0.05%), mosquitoes were transferred into insecticide-free tubes and maintained on 6% sucrose solution for 24 hrs. The number of dead and surviving mosquitoes was recorded, and they were preserved individually at −80°C for subsequent DNA analysis.

Amplification and sequencing of sodium channel gene fragments in natural Cx. pipiens pallens

This experiment used Cx. pipiens pallens adult mosquitoes reared from larvae collected in Wuxi, Jiangsu province. Genomic DNA of individual mosquitoes was extracted using the method as previously described [44]. DNA samples were further confirmed to Cx. pipiens pallens using the previously described PCR method [45]. The region containing kdr mutations within the para-sodium channel gene was amplified by PCR, using the genomic DNA from individual mosquitoes as template. The PCR primers were designed based on the cDNA sequence of Cx. quinquefasciatus para-sodium channel gene alpha subunit (Genbank accession number BN001092). The amplicon includes the 1014 codon conferring resistance to pyrethroid in other mosquito species and an intron region. The PCR reaction contained 1 unit of Pyrobest Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan), 10 ng genomic DNA, 0.4µM of primers Cpp1 and Cpp2 (see Table 5 for primer sequence), 0.2mM dNTPs, and the buffer provided by the polymerase supplier in a final volume of 50ul. Amplification was performed with the following cycling conditions: 30 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 60°C for 50 s and elongation at 72°C for 40 s, followed by extension at 72°C for 8 min. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and directly sequenced from both ends using ABI Big-Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit. PCR products from a total of 97 individuals were sequenced. The unique DNA haplotype sequences were deposited into GenBank (accession number GU198929 - GU198944, GU325775 - GU325777, GU339219 - GU339221). Sequences were aligned and analyzed using the ClustalW software [46] to determine polymorphism and synonymous or non-synonymous mutations.

Table 5
PCR primer and TaqMan probe sequences used in the present study.

Development and validation of allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) method for detecting kdr mutations

Because our study populations contained three forms of kdr alleles (wildtype, L1014F and L1014S) and previous AS-PCR method detects only two alleles (wildtype and L1014F) [14], we modified the AS-PCR method to differentiate the two mutations from the wildtype allele (Fig. 1A). Primer pair Cpp2 and Cpp3 (see Table 5 for primer sequences) amplifies a 389 bp fragment characteristic of wildtype susceptible allele (termed as L1014 allele for codon TTA), and primer pair Cpp1 and Cpp4 yields a 176 bp fragment representing a resistant allele (L1014F allele for codon TTT). Similarly, primer pair Cpp1 and Cpp5 amplifies a 176 bp fragment diagnostic to the L1014S resistant allele (for codon TCA). Therefore, the AS-PCR method includes two independent PCR reactions. The first reaction uses four primers (Cpp1, Cpp2, Cpp3 and Cpp4) to detect L1014 and L1014F alleles, and the second uses four primers (Cpp1, Cpp2, Cpp3 and Cpp5) to detect L1014 and 1014S alleles. The PCR condition was 1×PCR buffer, 0.25µM of Cpp1 and Cpp2, 0.5 µM of Cpp3 and Cpp4 (or Cpp5), 2mM of Mgcl2, 0.2 mM dNTP mix, and 2.5 U Taq Polymerase (Promega) in a final reaction volume of 50µl. The PCR cycling condition was 5 min at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 2 min at 50°C and 2 min for 72°C and 10 min extension at 72°C. The DNA fragments were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. DNA from all 97 mosquitoes used in the above kdr gene sequencing from natural habitats in Wuxi was tested for amplification success rate, sensitivity and specificity of the AS-PCR method.

Detection of kdr mutations using TaqMan probe

TaqMan method of kdr mutation was developed following a previously described method [47]. Briefly, we designed forward and reverse primers and three minor groove binding probes (Applied Biosystems), using the Primer Express™ Software (version 2.0). The primer and TaqMan probe sequences are listed in Table 5. Probe “Wildtype” was labeled with VIC™ to detect wildtype L1014 allele (codon TTA at site 1014) (Fig. 6). Probes “FAM1” and “FAM2”, labeled with 6-FAM™, are for detection of the L1014F (codon TTT) and L1014S (codon TCA) alleles, respectively. In order to differentiate the two resistant alleles (L1014F and L1014S), two TaqMan real-time reactions were performed in parallel. The first reaction uses primers kdrF and kdrR, and probes Wildtype and FAM1 to detect L1014F allele; the second reaction uses primers kdrF and kdrR, and probes Wildtype and FAM2 to detect L1014S allele (Fig. 6). Each reaction included at least one negative control (double deionized molecular grade water). All samples and controls were amplified in triplicate.

Figure 6
Schematic diagram showing the design of primers and probes of TaqMan method for molecular diagnosis of kdr mutations.

Each PCR reaction used 10 ul of mixture consisting of 5 ng of mosquito genomic DNA, 5.0 µl of 2×PCR Mastermix (Thermo Scientific AB-0575-DC, Abgene, UK), 900 nM of each primer and 200 nM of each probe. The cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 min for carry-over inactivation, and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 92°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min. Samples were run on the ABI PRISM 7900 HT sequence detection system in 384-well format (Applied Biosystems). The system automatically monitors the increase in VIC and FAM fluorescence intensities in real time at each cycle. The threshold cycle (Ct) value of each PCR reaction was calculated using the software provided by the manufacturer. The same 97 mosquitoes used in the above kdr gene sequencing and AS-PCR method were tested using the Taqman method to determine its sensitivity and specificity.

Deltamethrin selections

To determine the dynamics of kdr alleles in response to insecticide selection, Cx. pipiens pallens population collected in Tangkou, Shandong Province, was subjected to deltamethrin selection at larval stage for a total of 12 generations in the laboratory. The concentration of deltamethrin (Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical Group Co.) used in the selection caused about 50% mortality among the fourth-instar larvae. For each population and at each generation, we maintained 3 larval trays, about 1000 larvae per tray, for the selected line and control line. The selected line normally incurred 50% larval mortality. Therefore, the adult population size for the selected line is at about 1000 individuals, and at least 2,000 individuals for the control line. Genetic drift is negligible under such a population size for limited number of generations (12). At generations 6 and 12, 50% lethal concentrations (LC50) were determined by bioasay. Briefly, about 250 fourth-instar larvae, divided into 5 groups, were exposed to 5 different concentrations of deltamethrin for 24 hr. Mortality of the control population was measured using 50 fourth-instar larvae water without any insecticides. The number of dead and surviving mosquitoes was recorded after 24 hr. LC50 was calculated using the Probit analysis [48] and Abbott's correction for mortality rate in the control population [49]. The kdr allele frequencies were examined in 100 randomly selected adult mosquitoes at generations 6 and 12 of Tangkou population under deltamethrin selection, using the Taqman method. Similarly, Kdr allele frequencies were examined in 100 mosquitoes at generations 6 and 12 in the same Tangkou population maintained in the laboratory without any insecticide selection.

Statistical analysis

To determine among-population difference in mosquito mortality rate in WHO insecticide susceptibility bioassay, univariate analysis of variance was conducted using arcsin transformation. Kdr allele frequency in six natural mosquito populations was calculated, and statistical difference among populations was examined using the t test. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the correlation coefficient between kdr allele frequency and bioassay-based mosquito survivorship in Cx. pipiens pallens.


We thank Zhikuan Jiang, Haifang Wang and Peng Cheng, Jianghong Rong, Huayun Zhou and Yang Zhang for assistance with mosquito collection. Two anonymous reviewers provided constructive suggestions.


Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Funding: This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health of US (R01 AI075746), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2008ZX10004-010) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30972564 and 30901244). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


1. Vulule JM, Beach RF, Atieli FK, Roberts JM, Mount DL, et al. Reduced susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to permethrin associated with the use of permethrin-impregnated bednets and curtains in Kenya. Med Vet Entomol. 1994;8:71–75. [PubMed]
2. N'Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbeto M, Rowland M. Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Scott JG, Dong K. kdr-Type resistance in insects with special reference to the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1994;109:191–198. [PubMed]
4. Williamson MS, Martinez-Torres D, Hick CA, Devonshire AL. Identification of mutations in the housefly para-type sodium channel gene associated with knockdown resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252:51–60. [PubMed]
5. Dong K. A single amino acid change in the para sodium channel protein is associated with knockdown-resistance (kdr) to pyrethroid insecticides in German cockroach. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997;27:93–100. [PubMed]
6. Pittendrigh B, Reenan R, ffrench-Constant RH, Ganetzky B. Point mutations in the Drosophila sodium channel gene para associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides. Mol Gen Genet. 1997;256:602–610. [PubMed]
7. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Berge JB, et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 1998;7:179–184. [PubMed]
8. Martinez-Torres D, Chevillon C, Brun-Barale A, Berge JB, Pasteur N, et al. Voltage-dependent Na channels in pyrethroid resistant Culex pipiens L mosquitoes. Pestic Sci. 1999;55:1012–1020.
9. Chandre F, Darriet F, Duchon S, Finot L, Manguin S, et al. Modifications of pyrethroid effects associated with kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14:81–88. [PubMed]
10. Martin RL, Pittendrigh B, Liu J, Reenan R, ffrench-Constant R, et al. Point mutations in domain III of a Drosophila neuronal Na channel confer resistance to allethrin. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;30:1051–1059. [PubMed]
11. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Wang X, Hemingway J, et al. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:491–497. [PubMed]
12. Diabate A, Baldet T, Chandre F, Dabire KR, Simard F, et al. First report of a kdr mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2004;20:195–196. [PubMed]
13. Anstead JA, Williamson MS, Denholm I. Evidence for multiple origins of identical insecticide resistance mutations in the aphid Myzus persicae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;35:249–256. [PubMed]
14. Song FL, X.M. C, Zhao TY, Dong YD, Lu BL. Pyrethroid resistance and distribution of kdr allele in Culex pipiens pallens in north China. International Journal of Pest Management. 2007;53:25–34.
15. Wondji CS, Priyanka De Silva WA, Hemingway J, Ranson H, Parakrama Karunaratne SH. Characterization of knockdown resistance in DDT- and pyrethroid-resistant Culex quinquefasciatus populations from Sri Lanka. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:548–555. [PubMed]
16. Awolola TS, Brooke BD, Koekemoer LL, Coetzee M. Absence of the kdr mutation in the molecular ‘M’ form suggests different pyrethroid resistance mechanisms in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae s.s. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8:420–422. [PubMed]
17. Fanello C, Petrarca V, della Torre A, Santolamazza F, Dolo G, et al. The pyrethroid knock-down resistance gene in the Anopheles gambiae complex in Mali and further indication of incipient speciation within An. gambiae s.s. Insect Mol Biol. 2003;12:241–245. [PubMed]
18. Yawson AE, McCall PJ, Wilson MD, Donnelly MJ. Species abundance and insecticide resistance of Anopheles gambiae in selected areas of Ghana and Burkina Faso. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18:372–377. [PubMed]
19. Stump AD, Atieli FK, Vulule JM, Besansky NJ. Dynamics of the pyrethroid knockdown resistance allele in western Kenyan populations of Anopheles gambiae in response to insecticide-treated bed net trials. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:591–596. [PubMed]
20. Della Torre A, Fanello C, Akogbeto M, Dossou-yovo J, Favia G, et al. Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa. Insect Mol Biol. 2001;10:9–18. [PubMed]
21. Chandre F, Darriet F, Manguin S, Brengues C, Carnevale P, et al. Pyrethroid cross resistance spectrum among populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. from Cote d'Ivoire. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999;15:53–59. [PubMed]
22. Pinto J, Lynd A, Elissa N, Donnelly MJ, Costa C, et al. Co-occurrence of East and West African kdr mutations suggests high levels of resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles gambiae from Libreville, Gabon. Med Vet Entomol. 2006;20:27–32. [PubMed]
23. Himeidan YE, Chen H, Chandre F, Donnelly MJ, Yan G. Short report: permethrin and DDT resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis from eastern Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77:1066–1068. [PubMed]
24. Cui Fen g, Raymond Michel, Qiao Chuan-Ling. Review: Insecticide resistance in vector mosquitoes in China. Pest Management Science. 2006;62:1013–1022. [PubMed]
25. McAbee RD, Kang KD, Stanich MA, Christiansen JA, Wheelock CE, et al. Pyrethroid tolerance in Culex pipiens pipiens var molestus from Marin County, California. Pest Manag Sci. 2004;60:359–368. [PubMed]
26. Li AY, Guerrero FD, Almazan Garcia C, George JE. Survey of resistance to permethrin and diazinon and the use of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to detect resistance alleles in the horn fly, Haematobia irritans irritans (L.). J Med Entomol. 2003;40:942–949. [PubMed]
27. Luby JP. St. Louis encephalitis. Epidemiol Rev. 1979;1:55–73. [PubMed]
28. Zhou L, Lawrence GG, Vineis JH, McAllister JC, Wirtz RA, et al. Detection of broadly distributed sodium channel alleles characteristic of insect pyrethroid resistance in West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes in the United States. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:321–327. [PubMed]
29. Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans M. Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/Melt Curve analysis. Malar J. 2006;5:16. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Chen H, Githeko AK, Githure JI, Mutunga J, Zhou G, et al. Monooxygenase levels and knockdown resistance (kdr) allele frequencies in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis in Kenya. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:242–250. [PubMed]
31. Corbel V, N'Guessan R, Brengues C, Chandre F, Djogbenou L, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus from Benin, West Africa. Acta Trop. 2007;101:207–216. [PubMed]
32. Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel W, Trung HD, Sochantha T, Coosemans M. Absence of knockdown resistance suggests metabolic resistance in the main malaria vectors of the Mekong region. Malar J. 2009;8:84. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. Baker MB, Alyokhin A, Porter AH, Ferro DN, Dastur SR, et al. Persistence and inheritance of costs of resistance to imidacloprid in Colorado potato beetle. J Econ Entomol. 2007;100:1871–1879. [PubMed]
34. Cao G, Han Z. Tebufenozide resistance selected in Plutella xylostella and its cross-resistance and fitness cost. Pest Manag Sci. 2006;62:746–751. [PubMed]
35. Jia B, Liu Y, Zhu YC, Liu X, Gao C, et al. Inheritance, fitness cost and mechanism of resistance to tebufenozide in Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag Sci. 2009;65:996–1002. [PubMed]
36. Tabashnik BE, Dennehy TJ, Carriere Y. Delayed resistance to transgenic cotton in pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15389–15393. [PubMed]
37. Rowland M. Behaviour and fitness of Gamma-HCH Dieldrin resistant and susceptible female Anopheles gambiae and An. stephensi mosquitoes in the absence of insecticide. Med Vet Entomol. 1991;5:193–206. [PubMed]
38. Berticat C, Bonnet J, Duchon S, Agnew P, Weill M, et al. Costs and benefits of multiple resistance to insecticides for Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Bourguet D, Guillemaud T, Chevillon C, Raymond M. Fitness costs of insecticide resistance in natural breeding sites of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Evolution. 2004;58:128–135. [PubMed]
40. Labbé P, Berticat C, Berthomieu A, Unal S, Bernard C, et al. Forty years of erratic insecticide resistance evolution in the mosquito Culex pipiens. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:2190–2199. [PubMed]
41. Tieyu W, Yonglong L, Hong Z, Yajuan S. Contamination of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and relevant management in China. Environ Int. 2005;31:813–821. [PubMed]
42. Wong MH, Leung AO, Chan JK, Choi MP. A review on the usage of POP pesticides in China, with emphasis on DDT loadings in human milk. Chemosphere. 2005;60:740–752. [PubMed]
43. WHO. Test procedures for insecticides resistance monitoring in malaria vectors, bio-efficacy and persistence of insecticidestreated surfaces. Geneva: 1998.
44. Collins FH, Mendez MA, Rasmussen MO, Mehaffey PC, Besansky NJ, et al. A ribosomal RNA gene probe differentiates member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1987;37:37–41. [PubMed]
45. Smith JL, Fonseca DM. Rapid assays for identification of members of the Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:339–345. [PubMed]
46. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. Bass C, Nikou D, Donnelly MJ, Williamson MS, Ranson H, et al. Detection of knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations in Anopheles gambiae: a comparison of two new high-throughput assays with existing methods. Malar J. 2007;6:111. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Finney DJ. Statistical logic in the monitoring of reactions to therapeutic drugs. Methods Inf Med. 1971;10:237–245. [PubMed]
49. Abbott FF. Lights That Are Hidden. Cal West Med. 1925;23:758. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science