PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of cjemWestJEMSubscribeSubmitInfo for Authors
 
Cal J Emerg Med. 2004 Apr-Jun; 5(2): 40–44.
PMCID: PMC2906968

Intimate Partner Violence Among Men Presenting to a University Emergency Department

Cherlin Johnson, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Julie Gorchynski, MD, MSc, FACEP, FAAEM

Abstract

Objective:

We sought to investigate the one-year point prevalence for male intimate partner violence (IPV) in men presenting to a university emergency department, to identify types of violence, to examine differences in male IPV rates based on patient demographics, and to identify any differences in prevalence based on types of partnership.

Methods:

This survey study was conducted from September 2001 until January 2002 at a tertiary, academic, Level I Trauma Center with an emergency department (ED) that has 40,000 visits per year. The anonymous written survey consisted of 16 questions previously validated in the Colorado Partner Violence Study, Index of Spouse Abuse and the Conflict Tactics Scale. This survey was administered to all consenting adult men who presented to the ED. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated when appropriate and a p-value of 0.05 was set for significance.

Results:

The one-year point prevalence rate of male IPV was 24% in our study population (82/346). Among the men who experienced some form of abuse specified as either physical, emotional, or sexual, the prevalence was calculated to be 15.6% (54/346), 13.6% (47/346), and 2.6% (9/346), respectively. Education, income, age, and race did not demonstrate an association for any one variable to be associated with intimate partner abuse (p>0.05) with the exception of increased risk of IPV among unemployed men in the relationship (p<0.04, OR 0.592). IPV towards men was found to affect both heterosexual as well as homosexual relationships. Overall, 2% (8/346) of the men surveyed had received medical treatment as a result of IPV by their intimate partner within the past year. Three percent (11/344) of those men reporting abuse were abusers themselves.

Conclusion:

The point prevalence of IPV among our study population was 24%. In our study of 346 men, male IPV crossed all socioeconomic boundaries, racial differences, and educational levels regardless of the sex of the partner.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137K).

Articles from The California Journal of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of The University of California, Irvine